The effect of different types of interview content (SI, PBDI, Mixed SI-PBDI) on applicant reactions /
The present study examined applicant reactions to different types of structured interview content by comparing between Situational Interview (SI), Patterned Behaviour Description Interview (PBDI) and mixed of Situational and Patterned Behaviour Description Interview (mixed SI-PBDI). Forty-six job in...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Kuala Lumpur :
Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia,
2014
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | Click here to view 1st 24 pages of the thesis. Members can view fulltext at the specified PCs in the library. |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The present study examined applicant reactions to different types of structured interview content by comparing between Situational Interview (SI), Patterned Behaviour Description Interview (PBDI) and mixed of Situational and Patterned Behaviour Description Interview (mixed SI-PBDI). Forty-six job incumbents participated in the present study. They were given transcripts of interview content for SI, PBDI, and mixed SI-PBDI which were counterbalanced in the order of their presentation. After each structured interview content given to the participants, they were asked to answer to applicant reactions' self-report measure toindicate their fairness or procedural justice perception to the three types of structured interview content. Results demonstrated a significant effect of structured interview content on applicants' fairness or procedural justice perception (Wilks's Λ = .45, F (2, 44) = 27.18; p < .001, multivariate ŋ2 = .55). Specifically, PBDI questions yielded higher perceived fairness or perceived procedural justice (M = 13.61) as compared to SI (M = 11.78) and mixed SI-PBDI (M = 10.89). These findings of the present study were discussed in relation to past literature, in addition to its strength and limitations, implications and recommendations for future research. |
|---|---|
| Physical Description: | xii, 102 leaves : ill. ; 30cm. |
| Bibliography: | Includes bibliographical references (leaves 87-92). |