منهجية التفسير الموضوعي عند محمد محمود حجازي ومحمد باقر الصدر : دراسة تحليلية مقارنة /

Shaikh Muḥammad Maḥmud Ḥijazi and Sayyid Muḥammad Baqir al-Ṣadr were among the most prominent scholars who have contributed significantly to the scientific debate in the area of thematic interpretation. This research is an attempt to study and analyse methodology employed by al-Ṣadr and Ḥijazi in th...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: مكرم الله، طارق طه
Format: Thesis
Language:Arabic
Published: Kuala Lumpur : Kulliyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia, 2020
Subjects:
Online Access:http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/10729
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 057760000a22004330004500
008 211207s2020 my a f m 000 0 ara d
040 |a UIAM  |b eng  |e rda 
041 |a ara 
050 0 0 |a BPA53.4 
100 1 |a مكرم الله، طارق طه 
242 1 0 |a Manhajiyah al-tafsir al-mawdu'i 'inda Muhammad Mahmud Hijazi wa-Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr :  |b dirasah tahliliyah muqaranah 
245 1 0 |a منهجية التفسير الموضوعي عند محمد محمود حجازي ومحمد باقر الصدر :  |b دراسة تحليلية مقارنة /  |c إعداد، طارق طه مكرم الله 
264 1 |a Kuala Lumpur :  |b Kulliyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia,   |c 2020 
300 |a [xi], 195 leaves :  |b illustrations ;  |c 30cm. 
336 |2 rdacontent  |a text 
337 |2 rdamedia  |a unmediated 
337 |2 rdamedia  |a computer 
338 |2 rdacarrier  |a volume 
338 |2 rdacarrier  |a online resource 
347 |2 rdaft  |a text file  |b PDF 
500 |a Abstracts in English and Arabic. 
502 |a Thesis (MAIRKQS)--International Islamic University Malaysia, 2020. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (leaves 186-195). 
520 |a Shaikh Muḥammad Maḥmud Ḥijazi and Sayyid Muḥammad Baqir al-Ṣadr were among the most prominent scholars who have contributed significantly to the scientific debate in the area of thematic interpretation. This research is an attempt to study and analyse methodology employed by al-Ṣadr and Ḥijazi in their approach towards thematic interpretation at both theoretical and practical levels. Throughout this study, the researcher has relied on the inductive approach by gathering the opinions and concepts expressed by both Ḥijazi and al-Ṣadr on thematic interpretations. The study was done through their prominent works within the area namely; al-Wiḥdat al-Mawḍu'iyyah fī al-Qur'an al-Karīm by Ḥijazi and al-Tafsīr al-Mawḍu'iy wa al-Filsafat al-Ijtima'iyyah fī al-Madrasat al-Qur'aniyyah by al-Ṣadr. Following the collection and gathering of views, the researcher adopted an analytical method by analysing the texts and opinions of each of scholar on thematic interpretation. The researcher then employed comparative analysis between the views of the two and their approach towards thematic interpretation in terms of theory, methodology and practice. This step is necessary in order to highlight the points of agreements and disagreements between them, and to reveal the complementarity dimension between their approaches. This research reveals an important aspect of contribution by both Ḥijazi and al-Ṣadr in discovering proper methods of approaching the Qur'anic discourse, simultaneously keeping abreast of recent developments on issues pertaining to the Muslims' life. It also provides a systematic lesson for researchers and interpreters on how to deal with Qur'anic text and to clarify the theories and rules of the Qur'an in various matters of thought and life. 
520 |a Shaikh Muḥammad Maḥmūd Ḥijazi and Sayyid Muḥammad Baqir al-Ṣadr were among the most prominent scholars who have contributed significantly to the scientific debate in the area of thematic interpretation. This research is an attempt to study and analyse methodology employed by al-Ṣadr and Ḥijazi in their approach towards thematic interpretation at both theoretical and practical levels. Throughout this study, the researcher has relied on the inductive approach by gathering the opinions and concepts expressed by both Ḥijazi and al-Ṣadr on thematic interpretations. The study was done through their prominent works within the area namely; al-Wiḥdat al-Mawḍuʻiyyah fī al- Qur'an al-Karim by Ḥijazi and al-Tafsir al-Mawḍuʻiy wa al-Filsafat al-Ijtimaʻiyyah fī al-Madrasat al-Qur'aniyyah by al-Ṣadr. Following the collection and gathering of views, the researcher adopted an analytical method by analysing the texts and opinions of each of scholar on thematic interpretation. The researcher then employed comparative analysis between the views of the two and their approach towards thematic interpretation in terms of theory, methodology and practice. This step is necessary in order to highlight the points of agreements and disagreements between them, and to reveal the complementarity dimension between their approaches. This research reveals an important aspect of contribution by both Ḥijazi and al-Ṣadr in discovering proper methods of approaching the Qur'anic discourse, simultaneously keeping abreast of recent developments on issues pertaining to the Muslims' life. It also provides a systematic lesson for researchers and interpreters on how to deal with Qur'anic text and to clarify the theories and rules of the Qur'an in various matters of thought and life. 
596 |a 1 
600 1 0 |a Hijazi, Muhammad Mahmud,  |d 1914-1972.  |t al-Wihdat al-Mawdu'iyyah fi al-Qur'an al-Karim 
600 1 0 |a Sadr, Muhammad Baqir,  |d 1932-1980.  |t al-Tafsir al-Mawduʻiy wa al-Filsafat al-Ijtimaʻiyyah fi al-Madrasat al-Qur'aniyyah 
655 7 |a Theses, IIUM local 
690 |a Dissertations, Academic  |x Department of Qur'an and Sunnah Studies  |z IIUM 
691 |a Tafsir al-mawdu'i 
700 1 |a Makramallah, Tarek Taha,  |e author 
700 0 |a Nadzrah Ahmad,  |e degree supervisor 
700 1 |a Mesawi, Mohamed El Tahir,  |e degree supervisor 
710 2 |a International Islamic University Malaysia.  |b Department of Qur'an and Sunnah Studies 
856 4 |u http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/10729 
900 |a naw-asbh 
999 |c 441635  |d 472400 
952 |0 0  |6 T BPA 53.4 M35 2020  |7 0  |8 THESES  |9 762832  |a IIUM  |b IIUM  |c MULTIMEDIA  |g 0.00  |o t BPA 53.4 M35 2020  |p 11100431693  |r 1900-01-02  |t 1  |v 0.00  |y THESIS