منهج تناول اليهودية عند أحمد شلبي وعرفان عبد الحميد: دراسة مقارنة /

This research aims at studying the features and characteristics of the method of authorship in the Jewish religion according to both Ahmad Shalabi and 'Irfan Abdul HamidFattah, whereby using a comparative approach between their writings in the field of comparative religions in general, and Juda...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: بلوي، موسى بن عبد الله
Format: Thesis
Language:Arabic
Published: Kuala Lumpur : Kulliyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia, 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:Click here to view 1st 24 pages of the thesis. Members can view fulltext at the specified PCs in the library.
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
LEADER 037470000a22003370004500
008 190703s2019 my a f m 000 0 ara d
040 |a UIAM  |b eng  |e rda 
041 |a ara 
043 |a a-my--- 
084 |a BPD626.Y4 
100 1 |a بلوي، موسى بن عبد الله 
242 1 |a Manhaj tanawil al-Yahudiyah 'ind Ahmad Shalabi wa 'Irfan 'Abd al-Hamid :  |b dirasah muqaranah 
245 1 |a منهج تناول اليهودية عند أحمد شلبي وعرفان عبد الحميد:  |b  دراسة مقارنة /  |c إعداد، موسى بن عبد الله البلوي 
264 1 |a Kuala Lumpur :  |b Kulliyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences, International Islamic University Malaysia,   |c 2019 
300 |a [xi], 185 leaves :  |b illustrations ;  |c 30cm. 
336 |2 rdacontent  |a text 
347 |2 rdaft  |a text file  |b PDF 
502 |a Thesis (Ph.D)--International Islamic University Malaysia, 2019. 
504 |a Includes bibliographical references (leaves 172-185). 
520 |a This research aims at studying the features and characteristics of the method of authorship in the Jewish religion according to both Ahmad Shalabi and 'Irfan Abdul HamidFattah, whereby using a comparative approach between their writings in the field of comparative religions in general, and Judaism in particular. The research contains five chapters and a conclusion. The first chapter is for the research proposal and its general structure, and the second chapter focuses on the definition of the Jewish religion and the methodology (ies) of the Muslim scholars in its study. The third and fourth chapters, respectively, deal with the biography, the writings of these two scholars and their methodology in the writing on Judaism as well as the sources and references used by them in this study. The last chapter of the research studies the aspects of agreement and disagreement between their methodologies. This research achieved the following findings: the works of both Ahmad Shalabi and ''Irfan Abdul Hameed are characterized with original and vast knowledge on Judaism. Their recognition and knowledge of a number of foreign languages has played a prominent role in their way of thinking. They are distinguished in the study of Judaism by applying the historical and descriptive approachs, as well as their use of objective criticism. The researcher found some differences between Ahmad Shalabi and ''Irfan Abdul Hameed in relation with the content of their books on Judaism. According to the researcher, both Ahmad Shalabi and ''Irfan Abdul Hameed relied on comparative analytical approach in addition to the historical approach, which is the dominant one in their books. In addition, the convergence in the quality of their sources is often the result of similarity of their methodology. 
596 |a 1 
655 7 |a Theses, IIUM local 
690 |a Dissertations, Academic  |x Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences  |z IIUM 
691 |a Yahudi 
700 1 |a Balawi, Musa ibn Abdullah,  |e author 
710 2 |a International Islamic University Malaysia.  |b Kulliyyah of Islamic Revealed Knowledge and Human Sciences 
856 4 |u https://lib.iium.edu.my/mom/services/mom/document/getFile/4jRjQHfd1QpECtPZ5MZigHeGjXvFTILl20190830162844456  |z Click here to view 1st 24 pages of the thesis. Members can view fulltext at the specified PCs in the library. 
900 |a aah-sn 
999 |c 441848  |d 473328 
952 |0 0  |6 T BPD 626 Y4 B35 2019  |7 0  |8 THESES  |9 764031  |a IIUM  |b IIUM  |c MULTIMEDIA  |g 0.00  |o t BPD 626 Y4 B35 2019  |p 11100407486  |r 2020-09-28  |t 1  |v 0.00  |y THESIS 
952 |0 0  |6 TS CDF BPD 626 Y4 B35 2019  |7 0  |8 THESES  |9 858358  |a IIUM  |b IIUM  |c MULTIMEDIA  |g 0.00  |o ts cdf BPD 626 Y4 B35 2019  |p 11100407487  |r 2020-09-28  |t 1  |v 0.00  |y THESISDIG