الرقابة على القرارات الإدارية ووسائلها في النظام القانوني الليبي : دراسة مقارنة مع القانون المصري
The aim of this research is to study the different control instruments or means applied on the legitimacy of administrative decisions in the Libyan legal system, and the effectiveness of these means in curbing the despotism of the executive authority and its administrative system, by placing its adm...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis Book |
| Language: | Arabic |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://studentrepo.iium.edu.my/handle/123456789/11121 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | The aim of this research is to study the different control instruments or means
applied on the legitimacy of administrative decisions in the Libyan legal system,
and the effectiveness of these means in curbing the despotism of the executive
authority and its administrative system, by placing its administrative decisions
under the supervision of the legitimation principle. This all to achieve the state
of rights in which both the ruler and the governed people are subject to the law.
This study adopted an analytical and comparative approach, the analytical
approach was used to analyze the concept of the administrative decisions’
legitimacy and its basic principles, and to explain the reasons behind the
termination of the administrative decisions, whether with or without the will of
the administration, besides, the analytical method has enabled the study to
analyze the legal texts and judicial provisions related to this subject of the
research. Through a comparative method, the study has compared the Libyan
legal system with the Egyptian legal system to identify the similarities and
differences, to properly define the concept of the principle of legality in the
administration field, the reasons for the end of administrative decisions, and also
to scientifically benefit from the Egyptian and other judicial rulings, which are
rich of studies that are beneficial to this research. The finding of this study
concluded on that the basis of the legitimacy of the administrative decision lies
in its submission to the rule of law, this kind of submission is not restricting the
administration’s work but disabling any kind of autocracy while making
decisions. The study concluded also that not everything that comes from the
administration is an administrative decision, as there are certain conditions and
pillars that should be fulfilled to acquire the capacity to make such a decision.
And for an administration to not be deviated from the principle of legality, it must
be subjected to different instruments or means of control, the legislative authority
has a supervision and control power over the executive authority, in the
meantime, the administration has its own control power such as withdrawal and
administrative cancellation power. There are also other means of control that are
outside the power of administration, these means of administrative and financial
control are owned by the legislative authorities which monitor and control the
actions of the administration, holding them accountable for any offences in the
decisions made. At the end, the Libyan judicial authority has its own instruments
to control the legality of the administrative decisions under the title of annulment,
limiting with that the administrative judge's authority to determine the legitimacy
of the decision and to practice the annulment power if it is found illegal. |
|---|---|
| Item Description: | Abstracts in English and Arabic. "بحث متطلب مقدم لنيل درجة الدكتوراه في القانون."--On title page. |
| Physical Description: | [xvi], 381 leaves : illustrations ; 30cm. |
| Bibliography: | Includes bibliographical references (leaves 350-381). |