Effects of classroom debate and socratic method on critical thinking and speaking ability of Malaysian undergraduate ESL learners

The present research is an attempt to study the effects of classroom debate and Socratic Method on critical thinking and speaking ability of Malaysian undergraduate ESL learners. In addition, the study tries to determine which of these two methods is more effective in developing the participants‘...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Zare, Pezhman
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English
Published:	2016
Subjects:	Critical thinking - Study and teaching Speech - Study and teaching
Online Access:	http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/65690/1/FPP%202016%2027IR.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-upm-ir.65690
record_format	uketd_dc
spelling	my-upm-ir.656902018-10-09T07:01:52Z Effects of classroom debate and socratic method on critical thinking and speaking ability of Malaysian undergraduate ESL learners 2016-04 Zare, Pezhman The present research is an attempt to study the effects of classroom debate and Socratic Method on critical thinking and speaking ability of Malaysian undergraduate ESL learners. In addition, the study tries to determine which of these two methods is more effective in developing the participants‘ critical thinking and speaking ability. Furthermore, students‘ perceptions and feedbacks are investigated and explored toward these two methods. The study adopts a quasi-experimental mixed method design (pre-test, post-test design) in which both quantitative and qualitative methods of data collection is employed. The participants of the study consisted of an intact class of thirty two undergraduate students doing TESL at the Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia. The participants had completed two years of their degree program; the class was selected based on purposive sampling. The New Jersey Test of Reasoning Skills (NJTRS) and content analysis method (Newman et al., 1995) were administered to assess the learners‘ critical thinking skills at the beginning and at the end of the study. Participants‘ speaking ability was measured at the beginning and at the end of the study. To triangulate the data, semi-structured interviews were conducted to investigate the students‘ perceptions on the two teaching methods of the study. In addition, the participants provided their responses to a number of open-ended questions. Furthermore, ongoing observations were made to monitor the developments in participants‘ behavior and the classroom atmosphere. Based on the findings, the learners‘ critical thinking showed improvement after going through classroom debates and Socratic discussions for nine and ten sessions respectively. Both classroom debate and Socratic Method were equally effective in improving the participants‘ critical thinking. The participants‘ speaking ability showed significant progress after going through the classroom debates and Socratic discussions. Classroom debate, however, showed to be more effective in improving speaking ability. The research participants also found the two methods of the study innovative, interesting, constructive, and helpful to teaching and learning. The respondents also believed that participating in classroom debate and/or Socratic discussions helped them overcome the fear of talking before a crowd, boost their confidence to talk and express their opinions, improve their speaking ability, and enhance their critical thinking skills. Critical thinking - Study and teaching Speech - Study and teaching 2016-04 Thesis http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/65690/ http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/65690/1/FPP%202016%2027IR.pdf text en public doctoral Universiti Putra Malaysia Critical thinking - Study and teaching Speech - Study and teaching
institution	Universiti Putra Malaysia
collection	PSAS Institutional Repository
language	English
topic	Critical thinking - Study and teaching Speech - Study and teaching
spellingShingle	Critical thinking - Study and teaching Speech - Study and teaching Zare, Pezhman Effects of classroom debate and socratic method on critical thinking and speaking ability of Malaysian undergraduate ESL learners
description	The present research is an attempt to study the effects of classroom debate and Socratic Method on critical thinking and speaking ability of Malaysian undergraduate ESL learners. In addition, the study tries to determine which of these two methods is more effective in developing the participants‘ critical thinking and speaking ability. Furthermore, students‘ perceptions and feedbacks are investigated and explored toward these two methods. The study adopts a quasi-experimental mixed method design (pre-test, post-test design) in which both quantitative and qualitative methods of data collection is employed. The participants of the study consisted of an intact class of thirty two undergraduate students doing TESL at the Faculty of Educational Studies, Universiti Putra Malaysia. The participants had completed two years of their degree program; the class was selected based on purposive sampling. The New Jersey Test of Reasoning Skills (NJTRS) and content analysis method (Newman et al., 1995) were administered to assess the learners‘ critical thinking skills at the beginning and at the end of the study. Participants‘ speaking ability was measured at the beginning and at the end of the study. To triangulate the data, semi-structured interviews were conducted to investigate the students‘ perceptions on the two teaching methods of the study. In addition, the participants provided their responses to a number of open-ended questions. Furthermore, ongoing observations were made to monitor the developments in participants‘ behavior and the classroom atmosphere. Based on the findings, the learners‘ critical thinking showed improvement after going through classroom debates and Socratic discussions for nine and ten sessions respectively. Both classroom debate and Socratic Method were equally effective in improving the participants‘ critical thinking. The participants‘ speaking ability showed significant progress after going through the classroom debates and Socratic discussions. Classroom debate, however, showed to be more effective in improving speaking ability. The research participants also found the two methods of the study innovative, interesting, constructive, and helpful to teaching and learning. The respondents also believed that participating in classroom debate and/or Socratic discussions helped them overcome the fear of talking before a crowd, boost their confidence to talk and express their opinions, improve their speaking ability, and enhance their critical thinking skills.
format	Thesis
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Zare, Pezhman
author_facet	Zare, Pezhman
author_sort	Zare, Pezhman
title	Effects of classroom debate and socratic method on critical thinking and speaking ability of Malaysian undergraduate ESL learners
title_short	Effects of classroom debate and socratic method on critical thinking and speaking ability of Malaysian undergraduate ESL learners
title_full	Effects of classroom debate and socratic method on critical thinking and speaking ability of Malaysian undergraduate ESL learners
title_fullStr	Effects of classroom debate and socratic method on critical thinking and speaking ability of Malaysian undergraduate ESL learners
title_full_unstemmed	Effects of classroom debate and socratic method on critical thinking and speaking ability of Malaysian undergraduate ESL learners
title_sort	effects of classroom debate and socratic method on critical thinking and speaking ability of malaysian undergraduate esl learners
granting_institution	Universiti Putra Malaysia
publishDate	2016
url	http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/65690/1/FPP%202016%2027IR.pdf
_version_	1747812358769606656

Effects of classroom debate and socratic method on critical thinking and speaking ability of Malaysian undergraduate ESL learners

Similar Items