Iran’s foreign policy towards the United States during the Khatami Presidency, 1997-2005
During World War II, Iran had a close relationship with the US. In 1952, Britain, the US and Mohammad Reza Shah planned a coup against Mohammad Mossadeq. They succeeded to remove Mosaddeq and consequently the relationship improved until 1979. After the Islamic Revolution, Iran-US relationship tra...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2016
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/67350/1/FEM%202016%2029%20IR.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | During World War II, Iran had a close relationship with the US. In 1952, Britain, the
US and Mohammad Reza Shah planned a coup against Mohammad Mossadeq. They
succeeded to remove Mosaddeq and consequently the relationship improved until
1979. After the Islamic Revolution, Iran-US relationship transformed into hostility.
The initial objective of this study is to discuss the various relevant factors that
influence Iran-US relationship over different periods of time and the reasons of
conflict and hostility between these two countries. The second objective is to explain
the changes of Khatami’s foreign policy compared to previous republic of Iran’s
presidents, and the process of this evolution during his presidency. The last objective
aims to identify the formal and informal factors that determine Iran’s foreign policy
which has not been fully investigated in the literature. Moreover, the detente policy,
dialogue among civilizations and the reasons that Khatami used them for his foreign
policy are explained in detail. Data have been collected from various sources namely
political articles, speeches and media reports on Khatami, Khamenei and other
formal and informal decision makers such as The Guardian Council, Assembly of
Experts, Expediency Council, Friday Prayer Speakers, and Military Leaders as
supplementary sources. Due to sensitivity of this research, the researcher used
speeches that are available from official newspaper archives such as Ettelaat and
Reuters as well as official websites such as www.khamenei.ir and www.khatami.ir.
Articles and books on formal and informal Iranian decision makers and their roles in
foreign policy especially in relationship with the US were used as secondary data to
support primary data gathered from speeches. Qualitative content analysis method is
employed to interpret those data. The finding of this study revealed that Iran’s
foreign policy is not only affected by formal powers, but also it is strongly affected
by informal factors. Therefore, these groups interfered in Khatami’s foreign policy
and strongly prevented him to develop relationship with US. To achieve this goal,
these groups tried to create tension in both policies, and decreased Khatamis’
political power. Beside these factors, other external factors such as September 11
attacks, labeling Iran as “axis of evil” by George Bush, and United States’ attack to
Iraq, led to strengthen Khatamis’s opponents in Iran. Furthermore, the finding
revealed that two factors introduced Khatamies’ policy, namely Detente and dialogue among civilizations. The reasons for choosing these two criteria as main
component of foreign policy were explained. This study implied that Mohammad
Khatami worked hard to improve Iran’s standing among the international
communities and provide the opportunity for Iran to avoid isolation and economic
sanctions against the country. He developed relationship with the European countries
and Persian Gulf States, however, he failed to improve the Iran-US relationship due
to following reasons. Firstly, the US cooperation in the coup against Mohammad
Mosaddeg damages the reputation of the US in Iran, because this coup was
recognized as a setback to Iran’s political development and killed any chance for this
country to develop into a democratic society. The Islamic government used the coup
against Mohammad Mosaddeg to energize anti-American attitudes. Secondly, the
hostage crisis which broke off the diplomatic relations between Iran and the US. In
response US imposed serious sanctions against Iran. Thirdly, Iran’s foreign policy is
very complicated phenomenon and formal and informal political structures compete
to gain more power, wealth and benefit, as a result these structures interfered in
foreign policy. |
|---|