Metadiscourse features in contemporary Islamic Friday Sermons in English
In the Islamic society and even in the society at large, Friday sermon is an effective vehicle of shaping people behaviours and influencing their religious orientation. It is one of the strongest Islamic obligations which is hold weekly to disseminate and persuade people of certain i...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2019
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://psasir.upm.edu.my/id/eprint/84739/1/FBMK%202019%2048%20-%20ir.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | In the Islamic society and even in the society at large, Friday sermon is an
effective vehicle of shaping people behaviours and influencing their religious orientation. It is
one of the strongest Islamic obligations which is hold weekly to disseminate and persuade people
of certain ideology through preaching and teaching approaches. In Friday sermons, as a rhetorical
religious genre, religious orators permanently try to convince the audience using
different strategies and language devices such as metadiscourse. Metadiscourse is a
rhetorical strategy used to obtain persuasive and communicative purposes as it helps writers
(speakers) to engage their audience and guide their understanding of a text. To this
end, the current study aimed at examining the status of the rhetorical devises of metadiscourse in
the three themes (belief, practice, and spiritual) of Islamic Friday sermon delivered
in English language. Put it in another way, to understand the engagement between the religious
orators and the congregation in the language of the Friday sermon, this study intended to (i)
inspect the types of metadiscourse markers and the extent to which metadiscourse markers are
deployed in the Islamic Friday sermons; (ii) identify the functions of metadiscoures markers in
the discourse of Friday sermons; and (iii) find out the distinction in the use of metadiscourse
markers among the three themes of the selected sermons.
To achieve the aims of this study, Hyland’s (2005) interpersonal model of
metadiscourse was adapted and the concordance MonoConc Pro 2.2 was used to analyse metadiscourse
devices that were deployed by thirty orators in thirty English Friday sermons (10 per theme)
selected purposively from different resources, such as khutbahbank.org, MuslimMatters.org,
and the sermons delivered by the instructors of Almaghrib institute. The findings suggested
that metadiscourse is prolific in the Islamic Friday sermons discourse and the orators
relied on interactional markers more than interactive markers. Engagement markers
were the most frequently used metadiscourse marker. In terms of the interactional category,
transitions were the most commonly used marker. Endophoric marker was the least frequent
deployment by the orators. In terms of metadiscourse functions, the persuasive
and communicative aspects of metadiscourse effectively supported the sermonic discourse
purposes. According to the findings, the dominant presence of metadiscourse is in the
sermons of practice/action theme. This shows the vital role of metadiscourse features in the
sermons of teaching nature.
A broader implication of this study is that it adds to the small number of linguistic
investigations that have applied the model of metadiscourse to non- academic discourse. There
are indications that the significant role of metadiscourse is not confined to academic
and written discourses only and metadiscourse in non-academic and spoken discourse could help
realise its potential as a systematic means of gaining insight into participant interaction. Such
exhibition of metadiscourse markers in a new type of context Islamic Friday sermons will
contribute to illustrate the potential of metadiscourse in non-academic spoken discourse. It is
expected to give insights on how metadiscourse markers can be effectively used to
construct a persuasive context whether in religious discourse or other discourses. Pedagogically,
the findings of this study are expected to raise the awareness of the important use of
metadiscourse in non-academic and spoken discourse among applied linguists and language
teachers, as well as for teachers and researchers in
theological schools for several courses such as public speaking. |
|---|