استخدام الدليل الإلكتروني لإثبات جرائم التزوير: دراسة مقارنة بين الإمارات العربية المتحدة ومصر
The study aims to investigate the use of electronic evidence to prove forgery offences through a comparative analysis of the UAE and Egypt. In the study, the researcher used the analytical technique, the comparative method, and the inductive approach. The study's dilemma is shown by the key...
Saved in:
| id |
my-usim-ddms-13159 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia |
| collection |
USIM Institutional Repository |
| language |
other |
| description |
The study aims to investigate the use of electronic evidence to prove forgery offences
through a comparative analysis of the UAE and Egypt. In the study, the researcher
used the analytical technique, the comparative method, and the inductive approach.
The study's dilemma is shown by the key question, which is: How is electronic
evidence utilized to establish forgery offences in UAE and Egyptian legislation? The
study yielded several conclusions, the most noteworthy of which was that the UAE
legislator was eager to produce legislative texts that combat electronic forgery
offences since it offered legal protection to electronic papers and signatures. It is also
set its rules and regulatory frameworks, with the most visible example being the UAE
legislator's outlawing of electronic forgery via Article No. (6) of Decree-Law No. (5)
of 2012 on combatting information technology crimes. Furthermore, the study's
findings demonstrated that Egyptian legislators have addressed information crimes by
developing legislative control systems and issuing new punitive legislative texts, such
as Law No. (175) of 2018 and its executive regulations No. (1699) of 2020, which
were issued to combat information technology crimes. Furthermore, the study's
findings revealed that, from the standpoint of Islamic law, restricting the methods of
proof to certain subjects does not allow for growth in safeguarding plaintiffs' rights in
establishing their cases. As a result, the researcher made the following
recommendations: The necessity for lawmakers in both the UAE and Egypt to adopt a
particular legislative rule that handles procedural issues linked to the crime of
electronic forging. Furthermore, the researcher recommends that both UAE and
Egyptian legislators consider the distinct nature of electronic forgery from traditional
forgery, which necessitates the development of a special law to define the acts that
fall under the term electronic forgery. The advantage of the research will help to
establish future visions and frameworks for national, legislative, and administrative
initiatives to combat electronic forgery in both the United Arab Emirates and the Arab
Republic of Egypt. |
| format |
Thesis |
| author |
عبير أحمد محمد الحميري Abeer 'Ahmad Mohammed Alhemeiri |
| spellingShingle |
عبير أحمد محمد الحميري Abeer 'Ahmad Mohammed Alhemeiri استخدام الدليل الإلكتروني لإثبات جرائم التزوير: دراسة مقارنة بين الإمارات العربية المتحدة ومصر |
| author_facet |
عبير أحمد محمد الحميري Abeer 'Ahmad Mohammed Alhemeiri |
| author_sort |
عبير أحمد محمد الحميري |
| title |
استخدام الدليل الإلكتروني لإثبات جرائم التزوير: دراسة مقارنة بين الإمارات العربية المتحدة ومصر |
| title_short |
استخدام الدليل الإلكتروني لإثبات جرائم التزوير: دراسة مقارنة بين الإمارات العربية المتحدة ومصر |
| title_full |
استخدام الدليل الإلكتروني لإثبات جرائم التزوير: دراسة مقارنة بين الإمارات العربية المتحدة ومصر |
| title_fullStr |
استخدام الدليل الإلكتروني لإثبات جرائم التزوير: دراسة مقارنة بين الإمارات العربية المتحدة ومصر |
| title_full_unstemmed |
استخدام الدليل الإلكتروني لإثبات جرائم التزوير: دراسة مقارنة بين الإمارات العربية المتحدة ومصر |
| title_sort |
استخدام الدليل الإلكتروني لإثبات جرائم التزوير: دراسة مقارنة بين الإمارات العربية المتحدة ومصر |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia |
| url |
https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/a2c3d0b7-0193-4468-bbc8-3b23b8f85e62/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/5a9b92df-afed-4e3c-ab52-646318354221/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/f0962f9f-ddc7-40a2-8e24-d0d0ef8eb9ec/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/ab747cbb-b022-4dfc-9b5a-4e050fe4cf7e/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/f153753e-e85b-4cf6-9849-880ba9f0cd6f/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/297aa78e-9dba-4ed3-aefa-957d38d5fdeb/download https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/2cad7c9c-2c25-496a-a58d-0988cc7dd8ff/download |
| _version_ |
1812444854249062400 |
| spelling |
my-usim-ddms-131592024-05-29T19:46:20Z استخدام الدليل الإلكتروني لإثبات جرائم التزوير: دراسة مقارنة بين الإمارات العربية المتحدة ومصر Istikhdam al-dalil al-iliktuni li-ithbat jara’im al-tazwir : dirasah muqaranah bayna al-imarat al-‘arabiyah al-muttahidah wa-misr عبير أحمد محمد الحميري Abeer 'Ahmad Mohammed Alhemeiri The study aims to investigate the use of electronic evidence to prove forgery offences through a comparative analysis of the UAE and Egypt. In the study, the researcher used the analytical technique, the comparative method, and the inductive approach. The study's dilemma is shown by the key question, which is: How is electronic evidence utilized to establish forgery offences in UAE and Egyptian legislation? The study yielded several conclusions, the most noteworthy of which was that the UAE legislator was eager to produce legislative texts that combat electronic forgery offences since it offered legal protection to electronic papers and signatures. It is also set its rules and regulatory frameworks, with the most visible example being the UAE legislator's outlawing of electronic forgery via Article No. (6) of Decree-Law No. (5) of 2012 on combatting information technology crimes. Furthermore, the study's findings demonstrated that Egyptian legislators have addressed information crimes by developing legislative control systems and issuing new punitive legislative texts, such as Law No. (175) of 2018 and its executive regulations No. (1699) of 2020, which were issued to combat information technology crimes. Furthermore, the study's findings revealed that, from the standpoint of Islamic law, restricting the methods of proof to certain subjects does not allow for growth in safeguarding plaintiffs' rights in establishing their cases. As a result, the researcher made the following recommendations: The necessity for lawmakers in both the UAE and Egypt to adopt a particular legislative rule that handles procedural issues linked to the crime of electronic forging. Furthermore, the researcher recommends that both UAE and Egyptian legislators consider the distinct nature of electronic forgery from traditional forgery, which necessitates the development of a special law to define the acts that fall under the term electronic forgery. The advantage of the research will help to establish future visions and frameworks for national, legislative, and administrative initiatives to combat electronic forgery in both the United Arab Emirates and the Arab Republic of Egypt. Universiti Sains Islam Malaysia 2023 Thesis other https://oarep.usim.edu.my/handle/123456789/13159 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/a2c3d0b7-0193-4468-bbc8-3b23b8f85e62/download 4f61b139389f356c7a9d5f60db3570b0 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/5a9b92df-afed-4e3c-ab52-646318354221/download a0e8dc8ffb7dcf1337323877deadb0c9 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/f0962f9f-ddc7-40a2-8e24-d0d0ef8eb9ec/download 775016efcd6a701a34269b178e29e0cb https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/ab747cbb-b022-4dfc-9b5a-4e050fe4cf7e/download bfcfea6d2e11759b51971c28e5f0ee56 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/f153753e-e85b-4cf6-9849-880ba9f0cd6f/download b794a685bb48871d7b0fdb6c1b2447d5 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/297aa78e-9dba-4ed3-aefa-957d38d5fdeb/download 8bb2ea4e96d4a77e815cd396f4599778 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/2cad7c9c-2c25-496a-a58d-0988cc7dd8ff/download 31048342f0677f6235534c22bc095089 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/53f6d823-61d3-441e-912f-6d1ff73ec918/download 8a4605be74aa9ea9d79846c1fba20a33 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/32a4ef3a-1239-4a73-84e3-4fefe0a21a4e/download 6f6f7cabd9ebe372775cb83a3b834204 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/a3f91d73-9ac7-4101-acf3-49ecd3f696f5/download 3bfe2b2897137d9135ff5d1657a037ac https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/bad56296-e9b8-477e-b185-9bf2aa2e7ab8/download 0cf60a494db1ce0dae4f20a25f79ee30 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/a455676e-7749-4128-bcb0-9a645cd2c205/download 2eaec46263418d9709eba456338ff3b3 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/c9a8f232-1887-4f2e-aaa7-aaa01a474299/download 564079bbdb46dc4626e5cec1715ff1c5 https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/37ef16b5-62f1-480e-9603-06a22b64fe6d/download dc103296bef78f5b1adc46f9931aeddb https://oarep.usim.edu.my/bitstreams/2516d712-d784-4a5a-8728-c9524aa59461/download ba0a777cdb584146fe2a1db4f058c82f |