In vitro and in vivo study of primary epidermal allografts versus xenografts transplanted on full thickness wound in rabbits
Skin grafting has been evolving as an important application in reconstructive surgery. Skin grafting accelerates healing of wounds as well as reduces insensible fluid loss from burns and other wounds. It also reduces the formation of scars and accelerates cosmesis. Mixed reports on the survival o...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2021
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.usm.my/49289/1/NORLAILY%20BINTI%20HANIFI-FINAL%20THESIS%20P-UM000913%28R%29%20PWD_unlocked-24%20pages.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Summary: | Skin grafting has been evolving as an important application in reconstructive
surgery. Skin grafting accelerates healing of wounds as well as reduces insensible fluid
loss from burns and other wounds. It also reduces the formation of scars and accelerates
cosmesis. Mixed reports on the survival of allogenic and xenogenic keratinocytes
require further substantiation to determine their role in wound healing. The purpose of
this study was to investigate the full thickness wound healing potential using primary
epidermal allografts versus xenografts in rabbits. The rabbit and rat skins were harvested
and cultured in vitro using specific growth media. Two full thickness wounds (2cm x
2cm) were created on the dorsum of the rabbits. Cultured epithelial allograft from the
rabbits and xenograft from the rat were sprayed onto the freshly created wounds along
with fibrin using the Tissomat device (Baxter, Austria). After four weeks, the rabbits
were euthanized and skin biopsies were taken from each healed wound and subjected to
histological evaluation using Haematoxylin and Eosin staining, immunohistochemical
staining and also histochemical staining. The result from this study revealed that both
graft showed favorable healing outcomes and healed without graft rejection. The scars
that formed after the wound healed also desirable and healed with less scar formation.
The immunological evaluation by flow cytometry analysis support the expected
outcome of the study by showing there was no immunological rejection occurred. In
conclusion, the primary epidermal allograft and xenograft have the potential to be used
as askin substitute to replace skin defects. This can overcome the limitation of
autologous skin donor site especially in burn cases. |
---|