Factors influencing implementation of advanced manufacturing technology in Malaysian and Indonesian small and medium enterprises

Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) play a vital role in boosting a country's economic development. While a huge number of SME have been founded, the total contribution to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is considered to be small compared to the contribution of large companies. In this sense, o...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rahardjo, Jani
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: 2015
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16772/1/Factors%20Influencing%20Implementation%20Of%20Advanced%20Manufacturing%20Technology%20In%20Malaysian%20And%20Indonesian%20Small%20And%20Medium%20Enterprises.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16772/2/Factors%20influencing%20implementation%20of%20advanced%20manufacturing%20technology%20in%20Malaysian%20and%20Indonesian%20small%20and%20medium%20enterprises.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utem-ep.16772
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection UTeM Repository
language English
English
advisor Yahya, Salleh
topic T Technology (General)
TS Manufactures
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
TS Manufactures
Rahardjo, Jani
Factors influencing implementation of advanced manufacturing technology in Malaysian and Indonesian small and medium enterprises
description Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) play a vital role in boosting a country's economic development. While a huge number of SME have been founded, the total contribution to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is considered to be small compared to the contribution of large companies. In this sense, one way to boost competitiveness is through implementing Advanced Manufacturing Technology (AMT); whereas large companies have no issue in implementing it, it is not the case for SME. This study then examined the prospect of implementing AMT in Malaysian and Indonesian SME. Structural Equation Modeling was arranged for analyzing variables covering Critical Success Factors (CSF), Obstacles, Organizational Characteristics, Strategic Alliances and Monitoring in every stage of the implementation. An approximately 535 samples of data used in this study were SME in food, herbs, and craft industry in Malaysia and Indonesia. Smart Path Least Square (PLS) was used to analyze the model. In conclusion, it was found that the AMT implementation had a significant impact on the performance of Malaysian SME but it did not have any significant impact on the performance of Indonesian SME. This might be due to the fact that AMT implementation in Indonesian SME was generally low. Also, Indonesian SME used hard AMT more than soft AMT. The hard AMT was used as the substitution for labor functions such that AMT has not been optimized the support from soft AMT. Nest, the factors that gave significant impacts on the AMT implementation were Strategic Alliances, Monitoring, and Critical Success Factors while the others, namely Obstacles and Organizational Characteristics, gave no significant impact on the AMT implementation. For the Malaysian SME, good leadership was the critical success factor for the AMT implementation, while for Indonesian SME it was organizational culture. Several Strategic alliances significantly affected the success of AMT implementation; they were strategy alliances with vendors, universities and government for Malaysian SME, and strategic alliances with vendors, customers, and government for the Indonesian SME. Monitoring also gave a significant impact on the success of AMT implementation, especially monitoring in humanware for AMT implementation in Malaysian SME and monitoring in technoware for AMT implementation in Indonesian SME. The strategic alliances had a particularly different level and priority in every stage of the AMT implementation. At the early stage of AMT implementation, Malaysian SME needed to make an alliance with university, while the Indonesian SME needed to make an alliance with vendor. At the installation phase, Malaysian and Indonesian SME needed to collaborate with vendors and the government. Furthermore, at the growth stage, Malaysian SME needed to make an alliance with the university, while the Indonesian SME needed to make an alliance with the government. Monitoring of the AMT implementation in every stage was different for both Malaysian and Indonesian SME. For Malaysian SME, monitoring at the pre-installation and installation stage was mainly important on orgaware and humanware, while monitoring at the growth stage was on orgaware. For Indonesian SME, monitoring every stage was relatively at the same level, which was mainly on technoware. This research then gave Malaysian and Indonesian SME new insights into the implementation of AMT. In short, to be successful in implementing AMT as an attempt to boost SME’s performance, SME should take into account the strategic alliances and monitoring factors.
format Thesis
qualification_name Doctor of Philosophy (PhD.)
qualification_level Doctorate
author Rahardjo, Jani
author_facet Rahardjo, Jani
author_sort Rahardjo, Jani
title Factors influencing implementation of advanced manufacturing technology in Malaysian and Indonesian small and medium enterprises
title_short Factors influencing implementation of advanced manufacturing technology in Malaysian and Indonesian small and medium enterprises
title_full Factors influencing implementation of advanced manufacturing technology in Malaysian and Indonesian small and medium enterprises
title_fullStr Factors influencing implementation of advanced manufacturing technology in Malaysian and Indonesian small and medium enterprises
title_full_unstemmed Factors influencing implementation of advanced manufacturing technology in Malaysian and Indonesian small and medium enterprises
title_sort factors influencing implementation of advanced manufacturing technology in malaysian and indonesian small and medium enterprises
granting_institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department Faculty of Technology Management and Technopreneurship
publishDate 2015
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16772/1/Factors%20Influencing%20Implementation%20Of%20Advanced%20Manufacturing%20Technology%20In%20Malaysian%20And%20Indonesian%20Small%20And%20Medium%20Enterprises.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16772/2/Factors%20influencing%20implementation%20of%20advanced%20manufacturing%20technology%20in%20Malaysian%20and%20Indonesian%20small%20and%20medium%20enterprises.pdf
_version_ 1747833892489920512
spelling my-utem-ep.167722022-04-19T11:46:27Z Factors influencing implementation of advanced manufacturing technology in Malaysian and Indonesian small and medium enterprises 2015 Rahardjo, Jani T Technology (General) TS Manufactures Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) play a vital role in boosting a country's economic development. While a huge number of SME have been founded, the total contribution to the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is considered to be small compared to the contribution of large companies. In this sense, one way to boost competitiveness is through implementing Advanced Manufacturing Technology (AMT); whereas large companies have no issue in implementing it, it is not the case for SME. This study then examined the prospect of implementing AMT in Malaysian and Indonesian SME. Structural Equation Modeling was arranged for analyzing variables covering Critical Success Factors (CSF), Obstacles, Organizational Characteristics, Strategic Alliances and Monitoring in every stage of the implementation. An approximately 535 samples of data used in this study were SME in food, herbs, and craft industry in Malaysia and Indonesia. Smart Path Least Square (PLS) was used to analyze the model. In conclusion, it was found that the AMT implementation had a significant impact on the performance of Malaysian SME but it did not have any significant impact on the performance of Indonesian SME. This might be due to the fact that AMT implementation in Indonesian SME was generally low. Also, Indonesian SME used hard AMT more than soft AMT. The hard AMT was used as the substitution for labor functions such that AMT has not been optimized the support from soft AMT. Nest, the factors that gave significant impacts on the AMT implementation were Strategic Alliances, Monitoring, and Critical Success Factors while the others, namely Obstacles and Organizational Characteristics, gave no significant impact on the AMT implementation. For the Malaysian SME, good leadership was the critical success factor for the AMT implementation, while for Indonesian SME it was organizational culture. Several Strategic alliances significantly affected the success of AMT implementation; they were strategy alliances with vendors, universities and government for Malaysian SME, and strategic alliances with vendors, customers, and government for the Indonesian SME. Monitoring also gave a significant impact on the success of AMT implementation, especially monitoring in humanware for AMT implementation in Malaysian SME and monitoring in technoware for AMT implementation in Indonesian SME. The strategic alliances had a particularly different level and priority in every stage of the AMT implementation. At the early stage of AMT implementation, Malaysian SME needed to make an alliance with university, while the Indonesian SME needed to make an alliance with vendor. At the installation phase, Malaysian and Indonesian SME needed to collaborate with vendors and the government. Furthermore, at the growth stage, Malaysian SME needed to make an alliance with the university, while the Indonesian SME needed to make an alliance with the government. Monitoring of the AMT implementation in every stage was different for both Malaysian and Indonesian SME. For Malaysian SME, monitoring at the pre-installation and installation stage was mainly important on orgaware and humanware, while monitoring at the growth stage was on orgaware. For Indonesian SME, monitoring every stage was relatively at the same level, which was mainly on technoware. This research then gave Malaysian and Indonesian SME new insights into the implementation of AMT. In short, to be successful in implementing AMT as an attempt to boost SME’s performance, SME should take into account the strategic alliances and monitoring factors. 2015 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16772/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16772/1/Factors%20Influencing%20Implementation%20Of%20Advanced%20Manufacturing%20Technology%20In%20Malaysian%20And%20Indonesian%20Small%20And%20Medium%20Enterprises.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/16772/2/Factors%20influencing%20implementation%20of%20advanced%20manufacturing%20technology%20in%20Malaysian%20and%20Indonesian%20small%20and%20medium%20enterprises.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=96194 phd doctoral Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty of Technology Management and Technopreneurship Yahya, Salleh 1. Archer N., Wang S. and Kang C., 2008. Barriers to the adoption of online supply chain solutions in small and medium enterprises. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 13 (1), pp. 73-82. 2. Arvanitis, S., Hollenstein, H., and Lenz, S., 2002. The Effectiveness of government Promotion of Advances in Manufacturing Technologies (AMT): An Economic Analysis based on Swiss Micro Data’, Small Business Economics Vol. 19(5), pp. 321-340. 3. Baldwin, J. R. 2002. Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers. Research Policy, Vol. 31, pp. 1-18. 4. Baldwin, J. R., &Sabourin, D. 2002. Advanced technology use and firm performance in Canadian manufacturing. Journal of Industrial and Corporate Change, Vol. 11(4), pp. 761- 789. 5. Baldwin, J. and Lin, Z. 2002, Impediments to advanced technology adoption for Canadian manufacturers. Research Policy, Vol 3(1), pp. 1–18. 6. Bamford, J.D., Gomes-Casseres, B., and Robinson, M.S. 2003. Mastering alliance structure: a comprehensive guide to design, management, and organization, Jossey-Bass, 1st Ed. 7. Barney, J. B. 2001. Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: a ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. Journal of Management, Vol. 27(6), pp. 643- 650. 8. Beatty, C. A. 1992. "Implementing advanced manufacturing technologies: Rules of the road", Sloan Management Review, Vol. 33 (4), pp. 49-60. 9. Beaumont, N., Schroder, Richard, &Sohal, A. 2002. Do foreign-owned firms manage advanced manufacturing technology better? International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 22(7), pp. 759-771. 10. Berry, A., and Mazumdar, D. 1991 Small-scale Industry in East and Southeast Asia: A Review of the Literature and Issues. Asian-Pacific Economic Literature. Vol 5 (2), pp. 35– 67. 11. Bhasin, B. B., and Venkataramany, S. 2010. Globalization of Entrepreneurship Policy Considerations For SME Development In Indonesia. Journal of International Business, Vol. 9(4), pp. 95-104. 12. Boyer, K.K., Leong, G.K., Ward, P.T., and Krajewski, L.J. 1997. Unlocking the potential of advanced manufacturing technologies, Journal of Operation Management, Vol. 15, pp. 331- 347. 13. Boyer, K.K., and Pagell, M. 2000. Measurement issues in empirical research: improving measures operation strategy and advanced manufacturing technology, Journal of Operation Management, Vol. 18, pp. 361-374. 14. Brache, A. P., and Bodley-Scott, S., 2005. Implementation: How to Transform StrategicInitiativesintoBlockbusterResults.New York.: McGraw-Hill. 15. Burcher, P. G., and Lee, G. L. 2000. Competitiveness strategies and AMT investment decisions. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 11(5), pp. 340-347. 16. Burcher, P., Lee, G., and Sohal, A. 1999. Lessons for implementing AMT: Some case experiences with CNC in Australia, Britain and Canada. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol 19(5), pp. 515-527. 17. Burgess, T. 1998. Buyer–supplier relationships in firms adopting advanced manufacturing technology: an empirical analysis of the implementation of hard and soft technologies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 15(2), pp. 127-152. 18. Cagliano, R. and Spina, G. 2000. Advanced manufacturing technologies and strategically flexible production. Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 18(2), pp. 169-190. 19. Castrillon. I., and Cantorna. S., 2005, The effect of the implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies on training in the manufacturing sector, Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 29(4), pp. 268-280. 20. Challis, D., Samson, D., & Lawson, B. 2005. Impact of technological, organizational and human resource investments on employee and manufacturing performance: Australian and New Zealand evidence. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 43(1), pp. 81- 107. 21. Chan et al., (2001), Investment appraisal techniques for advanced manufacturing technology (AMT): a literature review. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol 12(1), pp. 35-47. 22. Chelliah, S et al., 2010. Internationalization and Performance: Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) in Malaysia. International Journal of Business and Management, Vol. 5(6), pp. 27-37. 23. Chen, I. J., & Small, M. H. 1997. Planning for advanced manufacturing technology: A research framework. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 16(5), pp. 4-24. 24. Chen, L.-H., &Liaw, S.Y. 2006. Measuring performance via production management: a pattern analysis. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 55(1), pp. 79-89. 25. Chin, W.W., 2010. How to write up and report PLS analyses, In: Esposito Vinzi, V., Chin, W.W., Henseler, J., Wang, H. (Eds.), Handbook of Partial Least Squares: Concepts, Methods and Applications (Springer Handbooks of Computational Statistics Series, vol. II). Springer, Heidelberg, Dordrecht, London, New York, pp. 655-690. 26. Chung, C. (1996). Human issues influencing the successful implementation of advanced manufacturing technology. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 13(3), pp. 283-299. 27. Co, H.C., and Zhao, H. 1998. The human factor in advanced manufacturing technology adoption. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 18(1), pp. 87-106. 28. Cohen, G. 2004. Technology Transfer: Strategic Management in Developing Countries. SAGE, London, 261 Cunha, M. M., and Putnik, G.D 2008. Market of Resources as a Knowledge Management Enabler in VE. Knowledge Management: Concept, Methodologies, Tools and Applications, ed. Murray E.Jennex 2699-2711. 29. Dangayach, G.S and Deshmukh, S.G 2001, Practice Of Manufacturing Strategy: Evidences from Select Indian Automobile Companies, International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 39(11), pp. 2353-93. 30. Dangayach, G. S. 2003. Evidence of manufacturing strategies in Indian industry: a survey. International Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 83(3), pp.279-298. 31. Dangayach, G. S. and Deshmukh, S.G. 2005. Advanced manufacturing technology implementation: Evidence from Indian small and medium enterprises (SME). Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 16(5), pp.483-496. 32. Dangayach, G., &Deshmukh, S. 2006. An exploratory study of manufacturing strategy practices of machinery manufacturing companies in India. Omega, Vol. 34(3), pp. 254-273. 33. Das, T.K and Teng, B 1998, Resource and risk management in Strategic Alliances making process, Journal of Management, Vol. 2 4, pp. 21-42. 34. Das, T. K. 2005. Deceitful behaviors of alliance partners: potential and prevention. Management Decision, Vol.43 (5), pp. 706-719. 35. Dean, J., Yoon, S. and Susman, G. 1992, “Advanced manufacturing technology and organization structure: empowerment or subordination?”, Organization Science, Vol. 3 (2), pp. 203-29. 36. de Veaux, R.D., Velleman, P.F., and Bock, D.E. 2012, Stats, Data and Models, 3 rd edition, Addition –Wesley, Singapore. 37. Deruntz, B. D., & Turner, R. M. 2001. Organizational Considerations for Advanced Manufacturing Technology. Journal of Technology Studies, Vol. 3, pp. 4-17. 38. Díaz K., Dornberger U. and Rietdorf U. 2010. Alliance Decision-Making of SME. ECIME 2010, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Academic Publishing Limited 39. Díaz, K., Rietdorf, U., & Dornberger, U. 2011. Alliance Decision-Making of SME. New York, pp. 411-421. Efstathiades, A. (2000). Advanced manufacturing technology transfer and implementation in developing countries: The case of the Cypriot manufacturing industry. Technovation, Vol. 20(2), pp. 93-102. 40. Efstathiades et al. 2002, Strategic planning, transfer and implementation of Advanced Manufacturing Technologies AMT. Development of an integrated process plan. Technovation Vol. 22, pp. 201–212. 41. Elmuti, D and Kathawala, Y 2001. An overview of strategic alliances, Management Decision, Vol 39(3), pp. 205-218. Esteves, J. (2009). A benefits realisation road-map framework for ERP usage in small and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 22(1/2), pp. 25-35. 42. Eiling, Kee, and KwokKe, W. 2008. Organizational culture and leadership in ERP implementation. Decision Support Systems, Vol. 45, pp. 208 - 218. 43. Fulton, M., & Hon, B. 2010. Managing advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) implementation in manufacturing SME. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 59(4), pp. 351-371. 44. Ghani, K. and Jayabalan 2000. Advanced manufacturing technology and planned organizational change. The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 11(1), pp.1-18. 45. Ghosh, A. 2004. Learning in strategic alliances: A Vygotskian perspective. The Learning Organization, Vol. 11(4/5), pp. 302-311. 46. Ghozali, Imam, 2006. Model PersamaanStruktural, KonsepdanAplikasi, BadanPenerbitUniversitasDiponegoro, Semarang Gulati, R, 1998. Alliances and networks, Strategic Management Journal, Vol.19, pp. 293- 317. 47. Gupta, A., and Whitehouse, F. R. 2001. Firms using advanced manufacturing technology management: an empirical analysis based on size. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 12(5), pp. 346-350. 48. Haenlein, M., and Kaplan A. M., 2004. A Beginners Guide to Partial Least Squares Analysis. Understanding Statistics, Vol. 3(4), 283-297 49. Hashim, M.K and Abdullah, M.S 2000, A proposed framework for redefiningSME in Malaysia: One industry, one definition. Asian Academy of Management Journal, Vol. l1, pp. 65-79 50. Hazlina, A. N and Seet, P. S, 2009. Dissecting behaviour sassociated with business failure: A qualitative study of SME owners in Malaysia and Australian. Asia Soacial Science, Vol 5 (9), pp. 98-104 51. Hashim, M.K 2007, SME in Malaysia: A brief Handbook, August publication, Malaysia Josef, H and Vaclav, J. 2012. The Post-implementation Assessment of Advanced Technology Utilization. Journal of Competitiveness, Vol. 4 (3), pp 3-13 52. Idris et al.(2008, Relationships between Investments in Advanced Manufacturing Technology (AMT) and Performances: Some Empirical Evidences, European Journal of Economics, Finance And Administrative Sciences - Issue 13. Jonsson, P. 2000. An empirical taxonomy of advanced manufacturing technology. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 20(12), pp. 1446- 1474. 53. Jöreskog, K. G. 1978. Structural analysis of covariance and correlation matrices. Psychometrika, Vol 43 (4), pp. 443-477. 54. Kannan, V. R., and Tan, K. C. 2004. Supplier alliances: differences in attitudes to supplier and quality management of adopters and non-adopters. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, Vol. 9(4), pp. 279-286. 55. Khalil, T.M., 2000. Management of Technology: The Key to Competitiveness and Wealth Creation, McGraw-Hill 264 Ke& Wei 2008. Organizational culture and leadership in ERP implementation. Decision Support Systems, Vol. 45, pp. 208–218. 56. Koc, T., and Bozdag, E. 2009. The impact of AMT practices on firm performance in manufacturing SME. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 25(9), pp. 303–313. 57. Koh, S. C. L., &Gunasekaran, a. 2006. A knowledge management approach for managing uncertainty in manufacturing. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 106(4), pp. 439- 459. 58. Kuglin, A. F., 2002, Building, Leading and Managing Stratgeic Alliances, AMACOM 2002 Kwon, T. H. and Zmud, R.W. 1987 “Unifying the Fragmented Models of Information Systems Implementation," in R.J. Boland and R. Hirschheim (Eds.), Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, John Wiley- England. 59. Lemke, F., Goffin, K, Szwejczewski, M. 2005. Investigating the meaning of suppliermanufacture partnership: an exploratory study, International Journal of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management Vol 33(1), pp.12-35 60. Lin, C., Tan, B., and Chang, S. 2002. The critical factors for technology absorptive capacity. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 102(6), pp.300-308. 61. Lumpkin, G.T, and Dess, G.G,2001. Linking to Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The moderating role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle. Journal of Business Venturing. Vol 16(5), pp 429-451. 62. Malaysia, 2006, Ninth Malaysia Plan (9MP), 2006-2010, Malaysia 63. Malaysia 2006, Malaysia Economy under the Third Industrial Master Plan 2006-2020 (IMP3), Malaysia 64. Malaysia, 2006. Small Medium Enterprise (SME) Annual Report 2006, Malaysia. 65. Malaysia 2010, Small Medium Enterprise (SME) Annual Report 2010, Malaysia. 66. Matlay H and Weshead P., 2005. Virtual Teams and the Rise of E-Enterpreneurship in Europe. International Business Journal, Vol 23(3), pp. 279-300. 67. Machuca, J. a D., Díaz, M. S., and Gil, M. J. Á. 2004. Adopting and implementing advanced manufacturing technology: new data on key factors from the aeronautical industry. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 42(16), pp. 3183-3202. 68. Malholtra, N.K 2004, Marketing Research: An Applied Orientation 4 edition, Pearson Education, Inc; New Jersey. 69. Marri, H. B., Gunasekaran, A., and Sohag, R. 2007. Implementation of advanced manufacturing technology in Pakistani small and medium enterprises: An empirical analysis. Journal of Enterprise Information Management, Vol. 20(6), pp. 726-739. 70. Marri, H. B., Irani, Z., and Gunasekaran, A., 2007. Advanced Manufacturing Technology Implementation in SMEs: A Framework of Justification Criteria, International Journal of Electronic Business, Vol 18 (5), pp. 509-530. 71. McDermott, C., and Stock, G, 1999. Organizational culture and advanced manufacturing technology Implementation. Journal of Operations Management Vol 17, pp. 521–533. 72. Mechling G. W., Pearce, J.W., and Busbin, W. 1995. Exploiting AMT in small manufacturing firms for global competitiveness. International journal of & production Management, Vol. 11 (2), pp. 61-76 73. Ming, X., Yan, J., Wang, X., Li, S., Lu, W., Peng, Q., & Ma, Y. 2008. Collaborative process planning and manufacturing in product lifecycle management. Computers in Industry, Vol. 59(2-3), pp.154-166. 74. Mohr, J. and Spekman, R. 1994. Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership attributes, communication behaviour and conflict resolution techniques, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 15, pp. 135-152. 75. Monge, C. a M., Rao, S. S., Gonzalez, M. E., &Sohal, A. S. 2006. Performance measurement of AMT: a cross-regional study. Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 13(1/2), pp. 135-146. 76. Morrison, M. &Mezentseff, L. 1997. Learning alliances – a new dimension of strategic alliances, Management Decision, Vol. 35(5), pp. 351-357. 77. Narain, R., Yadav, R.C., &Jiju A. 2004, Productivity Gains From Flexible Manufacturing Experiences From India, International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol. 53(2), pp. 109-128. 78. Nemetz, P.L., and Fry, L.W., 1988. Flexible Manufacturing Organizations: Implication for Strategy Fromulation and Organization Design. Academy of Management Review, Vol 13 (4), pp. 627-638 79. Pansiri, J. 2005. The influence of managers’ characteristics and perceptions in strategic alliance practice. Management Decision, Vol. 43(9), pp.1097-1113. 80. Park, S.H. and Ungson, G.R. 2001. Interfirm rivalry and managerial complexity: A conceptual framework of alliance failure, Organisation Science, Vol. 12(1), pp. 37-53. 81. Pennings, J. M. 1987. Technological innovations in manufacturing. In J. M. Pennings & A. Buitendam (Eds.), New technology as organizational innovation. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. 82. Pribadi, H., & Kanai, K. 2011. Examining and Exploring Indonesia Small and Medium Enterprise Performance: An Empirical Study, Asian Journal of Business Management, Vol. 3(2), pp. 98-107. 83. Ordoobadi, S., and Mulvaney, N., 2001. Development of a justification tool for advanced manufacturing technologies: system-wide benefits value analysis. Journal of engineering and technology management, Vol 18, pp. 157-184. 84. Rahman, A. A. 2008. Buyer-Supplier Relationships in Advanced Manufacturing Technology Acquisition and Implementation in Malaysia. International Journal of Economic and Management, Vol. 2(1)), pp. 95-126. 85. Rahman, A. A., & Bennett, D. 2009. Advanced manufacturing technology adoption in developing countries: The role of buyer-supplier relationships. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 20(8), pp. 1099-1118. 86. Ramamurthy, K., 1995. The Influence of Planning on Implementation Success of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol. 42(1), pp. 62-73 267 87. Ramanatthan K., 1988. Technometric Model, Science and Public Policy, Vol. 15(4), pp. 230- 248. 88. Raymond L. 2005, Operations Management and Advanced Manufacturing Technologies In SME: A Contingency Approach. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 16 (8), pp. 936-955. 89. Raymond and St-Pierre, 2005. Antecedents and performance outcomes of advanced manufacturing systems sophistication in SME. International Journal of Operations & Production Management Vol. 25 (6), pp. 514-533. 90. Raymond, L. and Croteau, A. M. 2006. Enabling the strategic development of SME through advanced manufacturing systems: A configurational perspective. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 106(7), pp. 1012-1032. 91. Rosnah, M.Y., Ahmad, M.M, Sulaiman, S. and Mohammad, Z. 2003 Increasing Competitiveness through advanced manufacturing technologies, International Journal manufacturing Technology and Management, Vol.5. (4), pp.371-379. 92. Rosnah, M.Y., Ahmad M. M, and Osman, M.R 2004. Barriers To Advanced Manufacturing Technologies Implementation In The Small And Medium Scales Industries Of A Developing Country. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 1(1), pp. 39 - 46 93. Saberi, I.S, Yusuff R. M, Zulkifli, I.N., Ahmad M, 2010. EffectiveFactors onAdvanced Manufacturing TechnologyImplementation Performance:AReview, Journal ofApplied Sciences Vol. 10(13), pp.1229-1242. 94. Saha, G.C and Islam, N. 2000, Global Manufacturing Strategy: A Capability-Based Analysis, Published in the proceedings of the Third International Conference on Operations and Quantitative Management, Sydney, Australia, December 17-20, pp. 218-225. 95. Salaheldin, S. I. 2007. The impact of organizational characteristics on AMT adoption: A study of Egyptian manufacturers. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 18(4), pp. 443-460. 96. Saleh, A. S., &Ndubisi, N. O. 2006. An Evaluation of SME Development in Malaysia, International Review of Business Research paper, Vol. 2(1), pp. 1-14. 97. Sambasivarao, K and Deshmukh, S, 1995. Selection and implementation of advanced manufacturing technologies. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 15(10), pp. 43-62. 98. Schroder, Richard, &Sohal, A. S. 1999. Organisational characteristics associated with AMT adoption: Towards a contingency framework. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 19(12), pp. 1270-1291. 99. Sekaran, Uma 2003, Research Methods for Business: A skill Building Approach, John Wiley & Sons, Inc, USA 100. Shaik G.Y., Marri, H.B, and Sohag, R.A. 2011, AnAssessment ofAdvanced Manufacturing Technologies Implementation in Manufacturing Enterprises. Mehran University Research Journal of Engineering & Technology, Vol. 30 (2), pp. 247-254 101. Sharif, N, 1994a, Integrating Business and Technology Strategies in Developing countries .Technological Forecasating and Social Science change, Vol. 45(2), pp. 151-167 102. Sharif, N , 1997. Technology Strategy in developing countries: Evolving from comparative to competitive advantage. International journal of Technology Management, Vol. 14 (2), pp. 309-343 103. Shepherd, D. 2000. Advanced manufacturing technology does more radicalness mean more perceived benefits? The Journal of High Technology Management Research, Vol. 11(1), pp. 19-33. 104. Siegel et al., 1997. The adoption of advanced manufacturing technologies: human resource management implications. IEEE transactions on engineering management, Vol 44(3), pp 134-156. 105. Small, M.H. and Chen 1995, I.J., “Investment justification of advanced manufacturing technology: an empirical analysis”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol. 12, pp. 27-55. 106. Small, M.H. and Chen 1997, Organizational development and time-based flexibility: an empirical analysis of AMT adoptions. International Journal of Production, Vol 35 (11), pp. 05-21. 269 107. Small, M. H., &Yasin, M. M. 1997. Developing a framework for the effective planning and implementation of advanced manufacturing technology. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 17(5), pp. 468-489. 108. Small, M. 1999, “Assessing manufacturing performance: an advanced manufacturing technology portfolio perspective”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 99 (6), pp.266-278. 109. Small, M., and Yasin, M., 2000. Human factors in the adoption and performance of advanced manufacturing technology in unionized firms. Industrial Management & Data Systems Vol. 100(8), pp. 389-401. 110. Small, M. H. and Yasin, M. 2003. Advanced manufacturing technology adoption and performance: the role of management information systems departments. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 14(5), pp. 409-422. 111. Small, M., 2006. Justifying investment in advanced manufacturing technology: a portfolio analysis. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 106 (4), pp. 485-508. 112. Small, M., 2007. Planning, justifying and installing advanced manufacturing technology: a managerial framework. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, Vol. 18(5), pp. 513-537. 113. Sohal, a S., Sarros, J., Schroder, R., &O’neill, P. 2006. Adoption framework for advanced manufacturing technologies. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 44(24), pp. 5225-5246. 114. Sohal, A. S., Burcher, P. G., Millen, R., & Lee, G. 1999. Comparing American and British practices in AMT adoption. Benchmarking: An International Journal, Vol. 6(4), pp. 310- 324. 115. Sohal, A. S., Schroder, R., Uliana, E. and Maquire, W. 1992. Adoption of AMT by South African manufacturers. Integrated Manufacturing Systems.Vol. 12(1), pp. 15-34. 116. Spekman, R.E., Isabella, L.A., MacAvoy, T.C. and Forbes, T. 1996. Creating Strategic Alliances Which Endure, LongRange Planning, Vol. 29(3), pp. 346-357. 117. Stock, G. and McDermot, C.M 2001. Organizational and strategic predictors of manufacturing technology implementation success: an exploratory study. Technovation, Vol. 21(10), pp. 625-636. 118. Sun, H. 2001, Human resources development and integrated manufacturing systems. Integrated Manufacturing Systems, Omega, Vol. 12(3), pp195-204. 119. Sun, X. L, Tian, Y.Z, Cui, G.G. 2007, The empirical study on the impact of Advanced Manufacturing Technology on Organizational Structure and Human Resources Management, Proceeding International Conference on Management Science & Engineering (14th), August 20-22, 2007, pp. 1548-1553. 120. Swamidass, P. 1998) Explaining manufacturing technology use, firm size and performance using a multidimensional view of technology. Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 17(1), pp. 23-37. Tambunan, T. 2007a. Entrepreneurship development: SME in Indonesia. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, Vol. 12(1), pp. 95-118. 121. Tambunan, T. 2007b. Transfer of Technology to and Technology Diffusion among Nonfarm Small and Medium Enterprises in Indonesia, Knowledge Technology Policy, Vol. 20, pp. 243-258. 122. Tambunan, T. 2008. SME development, economic growth, and government intervention in a developing country: The Indonesian story, Journal International Entrepreneur, Vol. 6, pp. 147-167. 123. Thomas, A. J., Barton, R. & John, E.G. 2008. Advanced manufacturing technology implementation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, Vol 57 (2), pp. 156-176. 124. Tarek, K, 2000, Management of Technology: The Key to competitiveness and wealth creation, Boston, McGraw Hill 125. Thakur, L. S. 2006. Technology adoption in India: A Future persepective with analysis of important variables.Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Systems, Vol. 5(2), pp. 179-207. 271 126. Thakur, L. S., & Jain, V. K. 2008. Advanced manufacturing techniques and information technology adoption in India: A current perspective and some comparisons. International Journal Advanced Manufacturing Technology, Vol.36, pp.618-631. 127. Tiwana, A. 2000. The knowledge management toolkit: Practical techniques for building a knowledge management system, London, Prentice-Hall Inc. 128. Todeva, E., &Knoke, D. 2005. Strategic alliances and models of collaboration. Management Science, Vol. 43(1), pp. 123-148. 129. Tsikriktsis, N., Lanzolla, G., and Frohlich, M. 2004. Adoption of e-Processes by Service Firms: An Empirical Study of Antecedents Udin, 130. Z. M., Khan, M. K., &Zairi, M. 2006. A collaborative supply chain management framework: Part 1 – planning stage. Business Process Management Journal, Vol. 12(3), pp. 361-37 131. Vidyarthi N.K. and Lashkari R.S 2002, A Multi-Criterion Decision Model for Advanced Manufacturing Technology Acquisition in Supply Chain Networks, Proceeding IEEE ICIT 2002, Bangkok, Thailand, pp. 1235- 1240 132. Voss, C.A 1988 , “Implementation – a key issue in manufacturing technology: the need for a fieldof study”, Research Policy, Vol. 17 No. 2, pp. 55-63. 133. Waldeck, N., and Leffakis, Z., 2007, HR perceptions and the provision of workforce training in an AMTenvironment: An empirical study, Omega, Vol. 35, pp. 161 – 172. 134. Walters, A.T, Millward, H. and Lewis, A. 2006. Technology Implementation in Small Companies. Technology Management, Vol. 3(2), pp.149-169. 135. Wijanto, Setyo H 2008. Structural Equation Modeling, Yogyakarta, GrahaIlmu, Whipple, J.M. and Frankel, R. 2000. Strategic alliance success factors, The Journal of Supply Chain Management, Vol. 14, pp.124-132. 136. Wold, S. Trygg, J, Berglund, A., and Antii, H 2001, Some recent development in PLS Modeling, Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems. Vol 58(2), pp. 131-150. 137. Wong, K., 2005, Critical success factors for implementing knowledge management in small and medium enterprises. Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 105(3), pp. 261-279. 138. Yan, H., and Fionito, S., 2007, CAD/CAM diffusion and infusion in the US apparel industry. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management Vol. 11(2), pp. 238-245. 139. Young-Ybarra, C. and Wiersema, M. 1999. Strategic flexibility in information technology alliances: The influence of transaction cost economics and social exchangetheory, Organisation Science, Vol. 10(40), pp. 439-459. 140. Yusof, S. M., &Aspinwall, E. 2001. Case studies on the implementation of TQM in the UK automotive SME. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, Vol. 18(7), pp. 722-744. 141. Yusuff, R. et al 2001. A preliminary study on the potential use of the analytical hierarchical process (AHP) to predict advanced manufacturing technology (AMT) implementation. Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, Vol. 17(5), pp. 421-427. 142. Zammuto, R. F., & O’Connor, E. J. 1992. Gaining Advanced Manufacturing Technologies’ Benefits: The Roles of Organization Design and Culture. The Academy of Management Review, Vol. 17(4), pp. 701-715. 143. Zineldin, M and Bredenlow, T 2003. Strategic Alliance: synergies and challenges : a case of stratgeic outsourcing relationship “SOUR”. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 33(5), pp. 449-464. 144. Zineldin, M., and Dodourova, M. 2005. Motivation, achievements and failure of strategic alliances: The case of Swedish auto-manufacturers in Russia. European Business Review, Vol. 17(5), pp. 460-470.