Classification Of Gender Using Global Level Features In Fingerprint For Malaysian Population

A new approach of algorithm based on the Mark Acree’s theory, focusing on fingerprint global extracted features is proposed and implemented for enhancing gender classification method. This proposed method can automatically execute the ridge calculation process from the 25mm2 fingerprint and enhance...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Abdullah, Siti Fairuz
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/18564/1/Classification%20Of%20Gender%20Using%20Global%20Level%20Features%20In%20Fingerprint%20For%20Malaysian%20Population%2024%20Pages.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/18564/2/Classification%20Of%20Gender%20Using%20Global%20Level%20Features%20In%20Fingerprint%20For%20Malaysian%20Population.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utem-ep.18564
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection UTeM Repository
language English
English
advisor Abdul Rahman, Ahmad Fadzli Nizam

topic T Technology (General)
T Technology (General)
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
T Technology (General)
Abdullah, Siti Fairuz
Classification Of Gender Using Global Level Features In Fingerprint For Malaysian Population
description A new approach of algorithm based on the Mark Acree’s theory, focusing on fingerprint global extracted features is proposed and implemented for enhancing gender classification method. This proposed method can automatically execute the ridge calculation process from the 25mm2 fingerprint and enhance the forensic gender classification process. In this study, a relationship between fingerprint global features and a gender of person in Malaysian population is also explored, enhanced and improved by exploiting another five additional fingerprint features. A sample of 3000 fingerprints from 300 respondents of random selection are carefully taken before any relationship can be determined. For the classification part, five extracted features of the fingerprint are used which are Ridge Density (RD), Mean Ridge Count (RC), Ridge Thickness to Valley Thickness Ratio (RTVTR), White Lines Count (WLC) and Mean Pattern Types (PT). Two classification approaches which are the descriptive statistical and data mining are used in order to examine the classification of the gender by using the five extracted features. For data mining classification part, there are four popular machine learning classifiers used which are Bayesian Net.work (Bayes Net.), Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network (MLPNN), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). These four classifiers are used in the data mining task with five test cases each in order to find the accuracies of the gender classification. The accuracy of the results from the proposed method is compared to the Acree Method is shown in terms of relative error. For statistical approach using Ridge Density (RD), the relative error is 3.7% for male respondent and 4.1% for female respondent. Meanwhile, the overall performance of the result from the proposed method achieved more than 90% classification rate for all the classifiers. SVM emerges as the best classifier for all the different cases in order to classify the gender using the results from the proposed method.
format Thesis
qualification_name Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level Master's degree
author Abdullah, Siti Fairuz
author_facet Abdullah, Siti Fairuz
author_sort Abdullah, Siti Fairuz
title Classification Of Gender Using Global Level Features In Fingerprint For Malaysian Population
title_short Classification Of Gender Using Global Level Features In Fingerprint For Malaysian Population
title_full Classification Of Gender Using Global Level Features In Fingerprint For Malaysian Population
title_fullStr Classification Of Gender Using Global Level Features In Fingerprint For Malaysian Population
title_full_unstemmed Classification Of Gender Using Global Level Features In Fingerprint For Malaysian Population
title_sort classification of gender using global level features in fingerprint for malaysian population
granting_institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department Faculty of Information and Communication Technology
publishDate 2016
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/18564/1/Classification%20Of%20Gender%20Using%20Global%20Level%20Features%20In%20Fingerprint%20For%20Malaysian%20Population%2024%20Pages.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/18564/2/Classification%20Of%20Gender%20Using%20Global%20Level%20Features%20In%20Fingerprint%20For%20Malaysian%20Population.pdf
_version_ 1747833936092856320
spelling my-utem-ep.185642021-10-08T15:23:52Z Classification Of Gender Using Global Level Features In Fingerprint For Malaysian Population 2016 Abdullah, Siti Fairuz T Technology (General) TK Electrical engineering. Electronics Nuclear engineering A new approach of algorithm based on the Mark Acree’s theory, focusing on fingerprint global extracted features is proposed and implemented for enhancing gender classification method. This proposed method can automatically execute the ridge calculation process from the 25mm2 fingerprint and enhance the forensic gender classification process. In this study, a relationship between fingerprint global features and a gender of person in Malaysian population is also explored, enhanced and improved by exploiting another five additional fingerprint features. A sample of 3000 fingerprints from 300 respondents of random selection are carefully taken before any relationship can be determined. For the classification part, five extracted features of the fingerprint are used which are Ridge Density (RD), Mean Ridge Count (RC), Ridge Thickness to Valley Thickness Ratio (RTVTR), White Lines Count (WLC) and Mean Pattern Types (PT). Two classification approaches which are the descriptive statistical and data mining are used in order to examine the classification of the gender by using the five extracted features. For data mining classification part, there are four popular machine learning classifiers used which are Bayesian Net.work (Bayes Net.), Multilayer Perceptron Neural Network (MLPNN), K-Nearest Neighbor (KNN) and Support Vector Machine (SVM). These four classifiers are used in the data mining task with five test cases each in order to find the accuracies of the gender classification. The accuracy of the results from the proposed method is compared to the Acree Method is shown in terms of relative error. For statistical approach using Ridge Density (RD), the relative error is 3.7% for male respondent and 4.1% for female respondent. Meanwhile, the overall performance of the result from the proposed method achieved more than 90% classification rate for all the classifiers. SVM emerges as the best classifier for all the different cases in order to classify the gender using the results from the proposed method. UTeM 2016 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/18564/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/18564/1/Classification%20Of%20Gender%20Using%20Global%20Level%20Features%20In%20Fingerprint%20For%20Malaysian%20Population%2024%20Pages.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/18564/2/Classification%20Of%20Gender%20Using%20Global%20Level%20Features%20In%20Fingerprint%20For%20Malaysian%20Population.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=100896 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty of Information and Communication Technology Abdul Rahman, Ahmad Fadzli Nizam 1. Acree, M. A. 1999. Is there a gender difference in fingerprint ridge density?. Forensic science international, 102(1), 35-44. 2. Agrawal, H., & Choubey, S. 2014. Fingerprint Based Gender Classification using multi-class SVM. 3. Al-Ani, M. S. 2013. A Novel-Thinning Algorithm for Fingerprint Recognition.International Journal of Engineering, 2(2), 43-48. 4. Agnihotri, A. K., Jowaheer, V., & Allock, A. 2012. An analysis of fingerprint ridge density in the Indo-Mauritian population and its application to gender determination. Medicine, Science and the Law, 52(3), 143-147. 5. Ahmed, A. A., & Osman, S. 2016. Topological variability and sex differences in fingerprint ridge density in a sample of the Sudanese population. Journal of forensic and legal medicine, 42, 25-32. 6. Amayeh, G., Bebis, G., & Nicolescu, M. 2008. Gender classification from hand shape. In Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, 2008. CVPRW'08. IEEE Conference on Computer Society IEEE.1-7. 7. Arun, K. S., & Sarath, K. S. 2011. A machine learning approach for fingerprint based gender identification. In Recent Advances in Intelligent Computational Systems (RAICS), 2011 IEEE. 163-167. 8. Babler, W. J. 1991. Embryologic development of epidermal ridges and their configurations. Birth Defects Original Article Series, 27(2), 95-112. 9. Badawi, A., Mahfouz, M., Tadross, R., & Jantz, R. 2006. Fingerprint-Based Gender Classification. In IPCV. 41-46. 96 10. Bansal, A., Agarwal, R., & Sharma, R. K. 2012. SVM Based Gender Classification Using Iris Images. In Computational Intelligence and Communication Networks (CICN), 2012 Fourth International Conference IEEE. 425-429. 11. Barcode. RO., ND. Fingerprint Feature Extraction. [online] Available at: http://www.barcode.ro/tutorials/biomet.rics/fingerprint.html [Accessed on 8 August 2015]. 12. Bharadi, V. A., Pandya, B., & Nemade, B. 2014. Multimodal biometric recognition using iris & fingerprint: By texture feature extraction using hybrid wavelets. In Confluence the Next Generation Information Technology Summit (Confluence), 2014 5th International Conference- IEEE. 697-702. 13. Bhuyan, M. H., & Bhattacharyya, D. K. 2012. An Effective Fingerprint Classification and Search Method. arXiv preprint arXiv:1211.4503. 14. Biometrics Institute London U.K, 2011. Biometrics Institute, London, U.K. 2011. Biometric Vulnerability Assessment Expert Group [Online]. Available: http://www. biomet.ricsinstitute.org/pages/biometric-vulnerability-assessment-expertgroup-bvaeg.html 15. Brown, W. M., Hines, M., Fane, B. A., & Breedlove, S. M. 2002. Masculinized finger length patterns in human males and females with congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Hormones and behavior, 42(4), 380-386. 16. Ceyhan, E. B., & Sagiroglu, S. 2014. Gender inference within Turkish population by using only fingerprint feature vectors. In Computational Intelligence in Biome.rics and Identity Management (CIBIM), 2014 IEEE Symposium. 146-150. 97 17. Ceyhan, E. B., Sagiroglu, S., & Akyil, E. 2014. Gender Classification Based on ANN with Using Fingerprint Feature Vectors. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University, 29(1), 201-207. 18. Chand, P., & Sarangi, S. K. 2013. A Novel Method for Gender Classification Using DWT and SVD Techniques. International Journal of Computer Technology and Applications, 4(3), 445. 19. Cole, S. A. 2009. Forensics without uniqueness, conclusions without individualization: the new epistemology of forensic identification. Law, Probability and Risk, 8(3), 233-255. 20. Cummins, H., Waits, W. J., & McQuitty, J. T. 1941. The breadths of epidermal ridges on the finger tips and palms: a study of variation. American journal of Anatomy, 68(1), 127-150. 21. Dodge, Y. 2006. The Oxford Dictionary of Statistical Terms, OUP. ISBN 0-19-920613-9 22. Dolezel, M., Brezinova, E., Urbanek, J., Drahansky, M., & Kim, T. H. 2012.Influence of Skin Diseases on Fingerprint Quality and Recognition. INTECH Open Access Publisher. 23. Dongre, G. B., & Jagade, D. S. 2015. A Review and Study on Fingerprint Based Gender Classification using Classified Techniques. International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 6(3), 596. 24. Galbally, J., Marcel, S., & Fierrez, J. 2014. Image quality assessment for fake biometric detection: Application to iris, fingerprint, and face recognition. Image Processing, IEEE Transactions on, 23(2), 710-724. 98 25. Galbally, J., McCool, C., Fierrez, J., Marcel, S., & Ortega-Garcia, J. 2010. On the vulnerability of face verification systems to hill-climbing attacks. Pattern Recognition, 43(3), 1027-1038. 26. Gallasi H., 2012. Who What Why: How durable is a fingerprint?. BBC World Service, 29 Sep. 27. Gnanasivam, P., & Muttan, D. S. 2012. Estimation of Age Through Fingerprints Using Wavelet. Transform and Singular Value Decomposition.International Journal of Biome.rics and Bioinformatics (IJBB), 6(2), 58-67. 28. Gupta, S., & Rao, A. P. 2014. Fingerprint Based Gender Classification Using Discrete Wavelet Transform & Artificial Neural Network. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Mob. Comput, 3(4), 1289-1296. 29. Gutiérrez-Redomero, E., Alonso, C., Romero, E., & Galera, V. 2008. Variability of fingerprint ridge density in a sample of Spanish Caucasians and its application to sex determination. Forensic Science International, 180(1), 17-22. 30. Gutiérrez-Redomero, E., Alonso, M. C., & Dipierri, J. E. 2011. Sex differences in fingerprint ridge density in the Mataco-Mataguayo population. HOMO-Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 62(6), 487-499. 31. Gutiérrez‐Redomero, E., Quirós, J. A., Rivaldería, N., & Alonso, M. C. 2013. Topological Variability of Fingerprint Ridge Density in a Sub‐Saharan Population Sample for Application in Personal Identification. Journal of forensic sciences, 58(3), 592-600. 32. Golomb, B. A., Lawrence, D. T., & Sejnowski, T. J. 1990. SEXNET.: A Neural Network Identifies Sex From Human Faces. In NIPS (pp. 572-579). 99 33. Gornale, S. S., & Kruthi, R. 2014. Fusion of Fingerprint and Age biometric for gender classification using Frequency and Texture Analysis. Signal & Image processing: an International Journal (SIPIJ), ISSN 0976-710X (Online); 2229-3922 (Print), 5(6), 75-85. 34. HL., 2005. Do you have unusual fingerprint?. [online] Available at: http://handlines.blogspot.my/2005/09/do-you-have-unusual-fingerprints.html [Accessed on 21 June 2015]. 35. Home Training Tools, 1994. Forensic Science Experiments. [online] Available at: http://www.hometrainingtools.com/a/forensic-science-projects [Accessed on 23 August 2015]. 36. Ju, S. H., Seo, H. S., Han, S. H., Ryou, J. C., & Kwak, J. 2013. A Study on User Authentication Methodology Using Numeric Password and Fingerprint Biometric Information. BioMed research international, 2013. 37. Jain, A. K., Nandakumar, K., & Nagar, A. 2008. Biometric template security. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing, 2008, 113. 38. Jung, H. W., & Lee, J. H. 2015. Noisy and incomplete fingerprint classification using local ridge distribution models. Pattern Recognition, 48(2), 473-484. 39. Kaur, R., & Garg, R. K. 2011. Determination of Gender Differences From Fingerprint Ridge Density In Two Northern Indian Populations. Problems of Forensic Sciences, 85, 5-10. 40. Kapoor, N., & Badiye, A. 2015. Digital dermatoglyphics: A study on Muslim population from India. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences, 5(3), 90-95. 100 41. Khan, A. I., & Wani, M. A. 2014. Strategy to extract reliable minutia points for fingerprint recognition. In Advance Computing Conference (IACC), 2014 IEEE International. 1071-1075. 42. Khan, M. M. U., & Sadi, M. S. 2012. An efficient approach to extract singular points for fingerprint recognition. In Electrical & Computer Engineering (ICECE), 2012 7th International Conference. 13-16. 43. Khan, S. A., Nazir, M., Akram, S., & Riaz, N. 2011. Gender classification using image processing techniques: A survey. In Multitopic Conference (INMIC), 2011 IEEE 14th International . 25-30. 44. Kralik, M., & Novotny, V. 2003. Epidermal ridge breadth: an indicator of age and sex in paleodermatoglyphics. Variability and Evolution, 11, 5-30. 45. Kocharyan, D., & Sarukhanyan, H. 2011. High Speed fingerprint recognition method. In Multimedia Technology (ICMT), 2011 International Conference IEEE. 5892-5895. 46. Kumar, L., Agarwal, S., Garg, R., Pratap, A., & Mishra, V. K. 2013. Gender Determination Using Fingerprints In the Region of Uttarakhand. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 35(4), 308-311. 47. Luo, J., Song, D., Xiu, C., Geng, S., & Dong, T. 2014. Fingerprint Classification Combining Curvelet Transform and Gray-Level Cooccurrence Matrix. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2014. 48. Maltoni, D., Maio, D., Jain, A., & Prabhakar, S. 2009. Handbook of fingerprint recognition. Springer Science & Business Media. 49. Mulvihill, J. J., & Smith, D. W. 1969. The genesis of dermatoglyphics. The Journal of Pediatrics, 75(4), 579-589. 101 50. Mäkinen, E., & Raisamo, R. 2008. An experimental comparison of gender classification methods. Pattern Recognition Letters, 29(10), 1544-1556. 51. Malickas, A., & Vitkus, R. 2000. Fingerprint Pre-Classification Using Ridge Density. Informatica, 11(3), 257-268. 52. Nanakorn, S., & Kutanan, W. 2013. Variability of finger ridge density among Thai adolescents. Journal of Forensic Research, 2013. 53. Nithin, M. D., Manjunatha, B., Preethi, D. S., & Balaraj, B. M. 2011. Gender differentiation by finger ridge count among South Indian population. Journal of forensic and legal medicine, 18(2), 79-81. 54. Nayak, V. C., Rastogi, P., Kanchan, T., Yoganarasimha, K., Kumar, G. P., & Menezes, R. G. 2010. Sex differences from fingerprint ridge density in Chinese and Malaysian population. Forensic science international, 197(1), 67-69. 55. Nigeria, Y. L. 2012. Analysis, Design and Implementation of Human Fingerprint Patterns System “Towards Age & Gender Determination, Ridge Thickness To Valley Thickness Ratio (RTVTR) & Ridge Count On Gender Detection. Analysis, 1(2). 56. Nte, N. D. 2012. An Evaluation of the Challenges of Forensic Investigation and Unsolved Murders in Nigeria. African Journal of Criminology and Justice Studies: AJCJS, 6(1/2), 143. 57. Ping-ya, N. I., Wen-dong, G. E., & Li, P. E. I. 2012. Sex differences from fingerprint ridge density in the Chinese Han Population. Forensic Science and Technology, 2, 002. 58. Promponmaung, P., & Nanakorn, S. 2012. Finger ridge density of northeast Thai population. KKU Sci J, 40, 52-58. 102 59. Rajan, B. K., Anto, N., & Jose, S. 2014. Fusion of iris & fingerprint biometrics for gender classification using neural network. In Current Trends in Engineering and Technology (ICCTET.), 2014 2nd International Conference. 216-221. 60. Rajesh, D. G., & Punithavalli, M. 2014. Wavelets and Gaussian mixture model approach for gender classification using fingerprints. In Current Trends in Engineering and Technology (ICCTET.), 2014 2nd International Conference. 522-525. 61. Rajanna, U., Erol, A., & Bebis, G. 2010. A comparative study on feature extraction for fingerprint classification and performance improvements using rank-level fusion. Pattern Analysis and Applications, 13(3), 263-272. 62. Reddy, G. G. 1975. Finger dermatoglyphics of the Bagathas of Araku Valley (AP), India. American journal of physical anthropology, 42(2), 225-228. 63. Rivaldería, N., Sánchez-Andrés, Á., Alonso-Rodríguez, C., Dipierri, J. E., & Gutiérrez-Redomero, E. 2016. Fingerprint ridge density in the Argentinean population and its application to sex inference: A comparative study. HOMO-Journal of Comparative Human Biology, 67(1), 65-84. 64. Sam, N. M., Rema, P., & Nair, B. V. 2014. Sex Determination Using Fingerprint Ridge Density In South Indian Population. Journal of Indian Academy of Forensic Medicine, 36(4), 381-386. 65. Soanboon, P., Nanakorn, S., & Kutanan, W. 2015. Determination of sex difference from fingerprint ridge density in northeastern Thai teenagers. Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 66. Shan, C., Gong, S., & McOwan, P. W. 2007. Learning gender from human gaits and faces. In Advanced Video and Signal Based Surveillance, 2007. AVSS 2007. IEEE Conference. 505-510. 103 67. Sudesh Gungadin, M. B. B. S. 2007. Sex determination from fingerprint ridge density. Internet. Journal of Medical Update, 2(2). 68. Shinde, M. K., & Annadate, S. A. 2014. Study of different methods for Gender Identification using Fingerprints. 69. Taduran, R. J. O., Tadeo, A. K. V., Escalona, N. A. C., & Townsend, G. C. 2015. Sex determination from fingerprint ridge density and white line counts in Filipinos. HOMO-Journal of Comparative Human Biology. 70. Thomas, V., Chawla, N. V., Bowyer, K. W., & Flynn, P. J. 2007. Learning to predict gender from iris images. In Biometrics: Theory, Applications, and Systems, 2007. BTAS 2007. First IEEE International Conference. 1-5. 71. Thaiyalnayaki, K., Karim, S. S. A., & Parmar, P. V. 2010. Finger print recognition using discrete wavelet transform. International Journal of Computer Applications, 1(24), 96-100. 72. Tritech Forensics, 1986. Magnifier- 3.5X/7X Fingerprint. [online] Available at: http://tritechforensics.com/store/product/magnifier-35x7x-fingerprint [Accessed on 28 February 2016]. 73. Tom, R. J., Arulkumaran, T., & Scholar, M. E. 2013. Fingerprint based gender classification using 2d discrete wavelet transforms and principal component analysis. International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology, 4(2), 199-203. 74. Verma, M., & Agarwal, S. 2009. Fingerprint Based Male-Female Classification. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Computational Intelligence in Security for Information Systems CISIS’08. Springer Berlin Heidelberg. 251-257. 104 75. Van der Kooy, F., Maltese, F., Hae Choi, Y., Kyong Kim, H., & Verpoorte, R. 2009. Quality control of herbal material and phytopharmaceuticals with MS and NMR based metabolic fingerprinting. Planta medica, 75(7), 763. 76. Wadhwa, R., Kaur, M., & Singh, K. V. P. 2013. Age and gender determination from finger prints using RVA and DCT coefficients. Age, 3(8). 77. Wang, J. F., Lin, C. L., Chang, Y. H., Nagurka, M. L., Yen, C. W., & Yeh, C. 2008. Gender determination using fingertip features. Internett Journal of Medical Update-EJOURNAL, 3(2).