Quality Enhancement In Fan Cowl Assembly In An Aero Composite Manufacturing Company Using DMAIC Approach

Too often quality issues were taken lightly in the production. The organisation put more focus on pinpointing and counting the defect rather than improving the management performance. Hence increasing the number of rework in the production that will eventually increase time of production and cost. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Saari, Saadatunur
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/20779/1/Quality%20Enhancement%20In%20Fan%20Cowl%20Assembly%20In%20An%20Aero%20Composite%20Manufacturing%20Company%20Using%20DMAIC%20Approach%20-%20Saadatunur%20Saari%20-%2024%20Pages.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/20779/2/Quality%20Enhancement%20In%20Fan%20Cowl%20Assembly%20In%20An%20Aero%20Composite%20Manufacturing%20Company%20Using%20DMAIC%20Approach%20-%20Saadatunur%20Saari.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utem-ep.20779
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection UTeM Repository
language English
English
topic T Technology (General)
TS Manufactures
spellingShingle T Technology (General)
TS Manufactures
Saari, Saadatunur
Quality Enhancement In Fan Cowl Assembly In An Aero Composite Manufacturing Company Using DMAIC Approach
description Too often quality issues were taken lightly in the production. The organisation put more focus on pinpointing and counting the defect rather than improving the management performance. Hence increasing the number of rework in the production that will eventually increase time of production and cost. This situation will affect the customer’s trust towards the capability of the production. Facing quality issues in their production, an aero composite manufacturing company realise in increasing their competitive advantage, there are needs for their company to improve their operations through producing “right first time” quality product. Defects minimisation is the prerequisite to the quality improvement. Hence, this study presents the defects minimisation rate by introducing and implementing DMAIC methodology of Six Sigma into a fan cowl assembly of a selected aero composite manufacturing company. This improvement method from Six Sigma is a customer driven improvement approach that originally started in manufacturing industry. This systematic approach towards defects minimisation have been effectively utilised in many improvement process through five phases of DMAIC methodology named Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve and Control. Through this study, a Six Sigma team was developed to work on this issue. In this study, Pareto chart was used to identify the top occurring defects. Finding shows that quality issues related to sealant has become a great contribution to a high DPU number. Hence, the team has worked together to identify the major cause that led to the defects. Tools and techniques such as brainstorming, cause and effect analysis and FMEA were used to identify the probable causes and the potential root causes. Through data collection and several discussion, the team agreed that, being a manual assembly production would results to higher manual variability that will eventually led to human error. Different technique were used by the worker depending on their experience and also human factor affecting them while working. It was found that, by addressing error and incorporating them into control plan could greatly reduce the human error. Hence, the proper implementation of SOP and control plan were implemented in this study as the control measure in sustaining the improvement in the process. The results shows that this implementation help the workers to be more focus in doing their job. Besides, the record keeping system that has been documented will later greatly contribute in data collection in aiding another continuous improvement process.
format Thesis
qualification_name Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level Master's degree
author Saari, Saadatunur
author_facet Saari, Saadatunur
author_sort Saari, Saadatunur
title Quality Enhancement In Fan Cowl Assembly In An Aero Composite Manufacturing Company Using DMAIC Approach
title_short Quality Enhancement In Fan Cowl Assembly In An Aero Composite Manufacturing Company Using DMAIC Approach
title_full Quality Enhancement In Fan Cowl Assembly In An Aero Composite Manufacturing Company Using DMAIC Approach
title_fullStr Quality Enhancement In Fan Cowl Assembly In An Aero Composite Manufacturing Company Using DMAIC Approach
title_full_unstemmed Quality Enhancement In Fan Cowl Assembly In An Aero Composite Manufacturing Company Using DMAIC Approach
title_sort quality enhancement in fan cowl assembly in an aero composite manufacturing company using dmaic approach
granting_institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering
publishDate 2016
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/20779/1/Quality%20Enhancement%20In%20Fan%20Cowl%20Assembly%20In%20An%20Aero%20Composite%20Manufacturing%20Company%20Using%20DMAIC%20Approach%20-%20Saadatunur%20Saari%20-%2024%20Pages.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/20779/2/Quality%20Enhancement%20In%20Fan%20Cowl%20Assembly%20In%20An%20Aero%20Composite%20Manufacturing%20Company%20Using%20DMAIC%20Approach%20-%20Saadatunur%20Saari.pdf
_version_ 1747834004307968000
spelling my-utem-ep.207792021-10-08T17:03:58Z Quality Enhancement In Fan Cowl Assembly In An Aero Composite Manufacturing Company Using DMAIC Approach 2016 Saari, Saadatunur T Technology (General) TS Manufactures Too often quality issues were taken lightly in the production. The organisation put more focus on pinpointing and counting the defect rather than improving the management performance. Hence increasing the number of rework in the production that will eventually increase time of production and cost. This situation will affect the customer’s trust towards the capability of the production. Facing quality issues in their production, an aero composite manufacturing company realise in increasing their competitive advantage, there are needs for their company to improve their operations through producing “right first time” quality product. Defects minimisation is the prerequisite to the quality improvement. Hence, this study presents the defects minimisation rate by introducing and implementing DMAIC methodology of Six Sigma into a fan cowl assembly of a selected aero composite manufacturing company. This improvement method from Six Sigma is a customer driven improvement approach that originally started in manufacturing industry. This systematic approach towards defects minimisation have been effectively utilised in many improvement process through five phases of DMAIC methodology named Define, Measure, Analyse, Improve and Control. Through this study, a Six Sigma team was developed to work on this issue. In this study, Pareto chart was used to identify the top occurring defects. Finding shows that quality issues related to sealant has become a great contribution to a high DPU number. Hence, the team has worked together to identify the major cause that led to the defects. Tools and techniques such as brainstorming, cause and effect analysis and FMEA were used to identify the probable causes and the potential root causes. Through data collection and several discussion, the team agreed that, being a manual assembly production would results to higher manual variability that will eventually led to human error. Different technique were used by the worker depending on their experience and also human factor affecting them while working. It was found that, by addressing error and incorporating them into control plan could greatly reduce the human error. Hence, the proper implementation of SOP and control plan were implemented in this study as the control measure in sustaining the improvement in the process. The results shows that this implementation help the workers to be more focus in doing their job. Besides, the record keeping system that has been documented will later greatly contribute in data collection in aiding another continuous improvement process. 2016 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/20779/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/20779/1/Quality%20Enhancement%20In%20Fan%20Cowl%20Assembly%20In%20An%20Aero%20Composite%20Manufacturing%20Company%20Using%20DMAIC%20Approach%20-%20Saadatunur%20Saari%20-%2024%20Pages.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/20779/2/Quality%20Enhancement%20In%20Fan%20Cowl%20Assembly%20In%20An%20Aero%20Composite%20Manufacturing%20Company%20Using%20DMAIC%20Approach%20-%20Saadatunur%20Saari.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=104908 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering 1. Albliwi, S., Antony, J., Abdul, S., Lim, H., and Wiele, T. Van Der, 2014. Critical Failure Factors of Lean Six Sigma: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 31(9), pp. 1012–1030. 2. Andersson, R., Eriksson, H., and Torstensson, H., 2006. Similarities and Differences between TQM, Six Sigma and Lean. The TQM Magazine, 18(3), pp. 282–296. 3. Antony, J., 2006. Six Sigma for Service Processes. Business Process Management Journal, 12(2), pp. 234–248. 4. Antony, J., and Banuelas, R., 2002. Key Ingredients for the Effective Implementation of Six Sigma Program. Measuring Business Excellence, 6(4), pp. 20–27. 5. Antony, J., Montgomery, D.C., Bhuller, A.S., Kumar, M., and Mendibil, K., 2012. Application of Six Sigma DMAIC Methodology in a Transactional Environment. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 29(1), pp. 31–53. 6. Arnheiter, E.D., and Maleyeff, J., 2005. The Integration of Lean Management and Six Sigma. The TQM Magazine, 17(1), pp. 5–18. 7. Ballou, D.P., and Pazer, H.L., 1985. Process Improvement versus Enhanced Inspection in Optimized Systems. International Journal of Production Research, 23(6), pp. 1233–1245. 8. Bamford, D.R., Greatbanks, R.W., Bamford, D.R., and Greatbanks, R.W., 2005. The Use of Quality Management Tools and Techniques : A Study of Application in Everyday Situations. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 22(4), pp. 376 – 392. 9. Barbosa, G.F., de Carvalho, J., and Pereira de Souza, C.H., 2014. Deployment of a Laser Projection Solution for Stripes Plotting Based on Six Sigma DMAIC Methodology 10. Applied to Aircraft Painting Shop. Production & Manufacturing Research, 2(1), pp. 697–711. 11. Chakravorty, S.S., and Shah, A.D., 2012. Lean Six Sigma (LSS): An Implementation Experience. European J. of Industrial Engineering, 6(1), pp. 118–137. 12. Chang, H.J., 2012. The Manufacturing Sector and the Future of Malaysia’s Economic Development. Jurnal Pengurusan, 35, pp. 3–12. 13. Cheng, C., and Chang, P., 2012. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence Implementation of the Lean Six Sigma Framework in Non-Profit Organisations : A Case Study. Total Quality Management, 23(4), pp. 431–447. 14. Cheng, C.S., and Kuan, C.M., 2013. Research on Product Reliability Improvement by Using DMAIC Process A Case Study of Cold Cathode Fluorescent Lamp. Asian Journal on Quality, 13(1), pp. 67–76. 15. Chi, A., Bahjat, A., and Matsui, Y., 2011. Int . J . Production Economics Quality Management Practices and Competitive Performance : Empirical Evidence from Japanese Manufacturing Companies. Intern. Journal of Production Economics, 133(2), pp. 518–529. 16. Department of Statistic Malaysia, 2016. Index of Industrial Production, Malaysia March 2016. [online] Available at: https://www.statistics.gov.my/ [Accessed on 22 March 2016]. 17. Desai, D.A., Kotadiya, P., Makwana, N., and Patel, S., 2014. Curbing Variations in Packaging Process through Six Sigma Way in a Large-Scale Food-Processing Industry. Journal of Industrial Engineering International, 11(1), pp. 119–129. 18. Fan, J., Qian, C., Yung, K., Fan, X., Member, S., Zhang, G., and Pecht, M., 2015. Optimal Design of Life Testing for High-Brightness White LEDs Using the Six Sigma DMAIC Approach. IEEE Transactions on Device and Materials Reliability, 15(4), pp. 576–587. 19. Garza-reyes, J.A., Kumar, V., Antony, J., and Soriano-meier, H., 2012. A DMAIRC Approach to Lead Time Reduction in an Aerospace Engine Assembly Process. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 25(1), pp. 27–48. 20. Goh, T.N., and Xie, M., 2004. Improving on the Six Sigma Paradigm. The TQM Magazine, 16(4), pp. 235 – 240. 21. Gopalakrishnan Nair, T.R., Suma, V., and Tiwari, P.K., 2012. Significance of Depth of Inspection and Inspection Performance Metrics for Consistent Defect Management in Software Industry. IET Software, 6(6), pp. 524–535. 22. Habidin, N.F., and Mohd Yusof, S., 2013. Critical Success Factors of Lean Six Sigma for the Malaysian Automotive Industry. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 4(1), pp. 60– 82. 23. Hagemeyer, C., Gershenson, J.K., and Johnson, D.M., 2006. Classification and Application of Problem Solving Quality Tools: A Manufacturing Case Study. The TQM Magazine, 18(5), pp. 455–483. 24. Hamza, S.E.A., 2008. Design Process Improvement through the DMAIC Six Sigma Approach : A Case Study from the Middle East. Int. J. Six Sigma and Competitve Advantage, 4(1), pp. 35 – 47. 25. He, Z., Staples, G., Ross, M., and Court, I., 1996. Fourteen Japanese Quality Tools in Software Process Improvement. The TQM Magazine, 8(4), pp. 40–44. 26. Hellsten, U., and Klefsjö, B., 2000. TQM as a Management System Consisting of Values, Techniques and Tools. The TQM Magazine, 12(4), pp. 238–244. 27. Imran, M., Saquib, Q., Janjua, Y., and Zaman, K., 2013. Internationalization of Higher Education Institutions : Implementation of DMAIC Cycle. In: Akademi Kiado,. 28. Islam, M., Khan, A.M., and Khan, M.R., 2013. Minimization of Defects in the Sewing Section of Apparel Industry. Research Journal of Management Sciences, 2(8), pp. 10–15. 29. Jalote, P., and Agrawal, N., 2005. Using Defect Analysis Feedback for Improving Quality and Productivity in Iterative Software Development. In: Proceedings of the Information Science and Communications Technology (ICICT 2005), pp. 701–713. 30. Jenicke, L.O., Kumar, A., Holmes, M.C., Jenicke, L.O., Kumar, A., and Holmes, M.C., 2008. A Framework for Applying Six Sigma Improvement Methodology in an Academic Environment. The TQM Journal, 20(5), pp. 453–462. 31. Jiju, A., Netasha, K., Cullen, D., and Kumar, M., 2012. Lean Six Sigma for Higher Education Institutions (HEIs): Challenges, Barriers, Success Factors, Tools/techniques. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 61(8), pp. 940–948. 32. Jirasukprasert, P., Garza-reyes, J.A., Soriano-meier, H., and Rocha-lona, L., 2012. A Case Study of Defects Reduction in a Rubber Gloves Manufacturing Process by Applying Six Sigma Principles and DMAIC Problem Solving Methodology. In: 2012 International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management, pp. 472–481. 33. Judi, H.M., Jenal, R., and Genasan, D., 1999. Quality Control Implementation in Manufacturing Companies : Motivating Factors and Challenges. 34. Khanam, S., Talib, F., and Siddiqui, J., 2015. Identification of Total Quality Management Enablers and Information Technology Resources for ICT Industry: A Pareto Analysis Approach. International Journal of Information Quality, 4(1), p. 18. 35. Kumar, S., and Sosnoski, M., 2009. Using DMAIC Six Sigma to Systematically Improve Shopfloor Production Quality and Costs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 58(3), pp. 254–273. 36. Kumar, S., Wolfe, A.D., Wolfe, K.A., Kumar, S., Wolfe, A.D., and Wolfe, K.A., 2008. Using Six Sigma DMAIC to Improve Credit Initiation Process in a Financial Services Operation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 57(8), pp. 659–676. 37. Lee, Y.W., Strong, D.M., Kahn, B.K., and Wang, R.Y., 2001. AIMQ : A Methodology for Information Quality. Forthcoming in Information & Management. 38. Li, M.C., Al-refaie, A., and Yang, C., 2008. DMAIC Approach to Improve the Capability of SMT Solder Printing Process. IEEE Transactions on Electronics Packaging Manufacturing, 31(2), pp. 126–133. 39. Linderman, K., Schroeder, R.G., Zaheer, S., and Choo, A.S., 2003. Six Sigma: A Goal- Theoretic Perspective. Journal of Operations Management, 21(2), pp. 193–203. 40. Maarof, M.G., and Mahmud, F., 2016. A Review of Contributing Factors and Challenges in Implementing Kaizen in Small and Medium Enterprises. In: 7th International Economics & Business Management Conference, 35(October 2015), pp. 522–531. 41. Maleyeff, J., Arnheiter, E.A., and Venkateswaran, V., 2012. The Continuing Evolution of Lean Six Sigma. The TQM Journal, 24(6), pp. 542–555. 42. De Mast, J., and Lokkerbol, J., 2012. An Analysis of the Six Sigma DMAIC Method from the Perspective of Problem Solving. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(2), pp. 604–614. 43. McQuater, R.., Scurr, C.., Dale, G.., and Hillman, P.., 1995. Using Quality Tools and Techniques Successfully. The TQM Magazine, 7(6), pp. 37–42. 44. Mehrjerdi, Y.Z., 2011. Six-Sigma : Methodology , Tools and Its Future. Assembly Automation, 31(1), pp. 79 – 88. 45. Mishra, P., and Sharma, R.K., 2014. A Hybrid Framework Based on SIPOC and Six Sigma DMAIC for Improving Process Dimensions in Supply Chain Network. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 31(5), pp. 522–546. 46. Näslund, D., 2008. Lean, Six Sigma and Lean Sigma: Fads or Real Process Improvement Methods? Business Process Management Journal, 14(3), pp. 269–287. 47. Natarajan, M., Senthil, V., Devadasan, S.., Vijay Mohan, N., and Sivaram, N.., 2013. Quality and Reliability in New Product Development A Case Study in Compressed Air Treatment. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 24(8), pp. 1143–1162. 48. Pan, Z., Ryu, H., and Baik, J., 2007. A Case Study : CRM Adoption Success Factor Analysis and Six Sigma DMAIC Application. In: Fifth International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications, pp. 828–835. 49. Pepper, M.P.J., and Spedding, T. a., 2010. The Evolution of Lean Six Sigma. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 27(2), pp. 138–155. 50. Raisinghani, M.S., Ette, H., Pierce, R., Cannon, G., and Daripaly, P., 2005. Six Sigma: Concepts, Tools, and Applications. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 105(4), pp. 491–505. 51. Romano, E., Murino, T., Asta, F., and Costagliola, P., 2013. Lean Maintenance Model to Reduce Scraps and WIP in Manufacturing System: Case Study in Power Cables Factory. WSEAS Transactions on Systems, 12(12), pp. 650–666. 52. Roth, N., and Franchetti, M., 2010. Process Improvement for Printing Operations through the DMAIC Lean Six Sigma Approach A Case Study from Northwest Ohio , USA. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 1(2), pp. 119–133. 53. Rupp, J., Phillips, A., and Kumar, S., 2009. Using Six Sigma DMAIC to Design a High- Quality Summer Lodge Operation. Journal of Retail & Leisure Property, 8(May), pp. 173–191. 54. Snee, R.D., 2004. Six–Sigma: The Evolution of 100 Years of Business Improvement Methodology. International Journal of Six Sigma and Competitive Advantage, 1(1), pp. 4– 20. 55. Snee, R.D., 2010. Lean Six Sigma – Getting Better All the Time. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 1(1), pp. 9–29. 56. Sokovic, M., Pavletic, D., and Krulcic, E., 2006. Six Sigma Process Improvements in Automotive Parts Production. Journal of Achievements in Materials and ManufacturingEngineering, 19(1), pp. 96–102. 57. Southard, P.B., Chandra, C., Kumar, S., and Southard, P.B., 2014. RFID in Healthcare : A Six Sigma DMAIC and Simulation Case Study. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 25(4), pp. 291–321. 58. Swarnakar, V., and Vinodh, S., 2016. Deploying Lean Six Sigma Framework in an Automotive Component Manufacturing Organization. International Journal of Lean Six Sigma, 7(3). 59. Taner, M.T., 2013. Critical Success Factors for Six Sigma Implementation in Large-Scale. International Review of Management and Marketing, 3(4), pp. 212–225. 60. Tari, J.J., and Sabater, V., 2004. Quality Tools and Techniques : Are They Necessary for Quality Management ? International Journal of Production Economics, 92, pp. 267–280. 61. Thanki, I.M., Kotecha, K.N., and Shah, J.M., 2013. Calculation of Rejection from On-Line Customer Feedback Mechanism for Rejection Analysis and Quality Improvements in MSMEs. International Journal on Advanced Computer Theory and Engineering, 2(6), pp. 80–84. 62. Timans, W., Antony, J., Ahaus, K., and van Solingen, R., 2012. Implementation of Lean Six Sigma in Small- and Medium-Sized Manufacturing Enterprises in the Netherlands. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 63(3), pp. 339–353. 63. Trading Economics, 2016. Malaysia GDP Annual Growth Rate. [online] Available at: http://www.tradingeconomics.com/malaysia/gdp-growth-annual [Accessed on 1 April 2016]. 64. Uddin, S.M., Hasan, R., and Hosen, S., 2014. Defects Minimization through DMAIC Methodology of Six Sigma. In: International Conference on Mechanical, Industrial and Energy Engineering,. 65. Vijayaram, T.R., Sulaiman, S., Hamouda, A.M.S., and Ahmad, M.H.M., 2006. Foundry Quality Control Aspects and Prospects to Reduce Scrap Rework and Rejection in Metal Casting Manufacturing Industries. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 178(1-3), pp. 39–43. 66. Wang, H., 2008. A Review of Six Sigma Approach : Methodology , Implementation and Future Research. IEEE, pp. 2–5. 67. Yousaf, F., Butt, S.I., and Ahmad, R., 2013. Six Sigma Implementation to Reduce Rejection Rate of Pump Casings at Local Manufacturing Company. IOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering, 7(4), pp. 96–112. 68. Zakuan, N.M., Yusof, S.M., and Shaharoun, A.M., 2009. The Link between Total Quality Management and Organizational Performance in Malaysian Automotive Industry: The Mediating Role of ISO/TS16949 Efforts. In: IEEM 2009 - IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, pp. 439–443. 69. Zu, X., Fredendall, L.D., and Douglas, T.J., 2008. The Evolving Theory of Quality Management: The Role of Six Sigma. Journal of Operations Management, 26(5), pp. 630– 650.