Effect Of Post Processing Parameters Andcompression Behavior On FDM 3D-Printed ABS Lattice-Structures

There is a growing development in lattice structure due to fundamental interest of the industries in producing parts with higher performance albeit with a low energy and cost consumption. Lattice structure is a periodic cellular structure which can serve the purpose of achieving lightweight parts wi...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Rosli, Nur Ameelia
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English English
Published:	2019
Subjects:	TA Engineering (General) Civil engineering (General)
Online Access:	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24658/1/Effect%20Of%20Post%20Processing%20Parameters%20Andcompression%20Behavior%20On%20FDM%203D-Printed%20ABS%20Lattice-Structures.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24658/2/Effect%20Of%20Post%20Processing%20Parameters%20Andcompression%20Behavior%20On%20FDM%203D-Printed%20ABS%20Lattice-Structures.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-utem-ep.24658
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection	UTeM Repository
language	English English
advisor	Hasan, Rafidah
topic	TA Engineering (General) Civil engineering (General)
spellingShingle	TA Engineering (General) Civil engineering (General) Rosli, Nur Ameelia Effect Of Post Processing Parameters Andcompression Behavior On FDM 3D-Printed ABS Lattice-Structures
description	There is a growing development in lattice structure due to fundamental interest of the industries in producing parts with higher performance albeit with a low energy and cost consumption. Lattice structure is a periodic cellular structure which can serve the purpose of achieving lightweight parts with good mechanical properties. The complexity of manufacturing numerous types of lattice structures can be overcome by additive manufacturing (AM) process which offers better reliability and relatively simple procedure as compared to normal manufacturing. For the past decade, there are many studies on the lattice structure fabrication by AM. However, from literature, it is found that not many studies reported about the investigation on lattice structure by non-metallic, especially the ABS polymer. The use of ABS polymer to produce lattice structure serves as an added value for lightweight applications due to the lightweight characteristics of the ABS itself. The fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printed process of lattice structure is rarely reported in previous studies, hence it is difficult to confidently understand the behaviour of produced lattice structure by using combinations of FDM parameters. On top of that, there is limited information regarding the relationships between the pre-set parameters of CubePro’s mid- range FDM printed lattice structure with its mechanical properties. Therefore, this study characterized and examined the manufacturability of lattice structure geometry that was produced by FDM. The effect of process parameters of mid-range FDM 3D printer on the geometry of ABS lattice-structure were then evaluated. Later, the relationships between mechanical properties of ABS FDM 3D printed lattice structure with its geometry were derived by using experimental approach to justify the material as lightweight material. The CubePro 3D printer machine was utilized to fabricate the BCC lattice structure cube specimens with dimension of 20 x 20 x 20 mm3 with strut’s diameter sizes of 1.2 mm, 1.4 mm and 1.6 mm. Optical microscopy was used to characterize the printed lattice structures cube specimens. Theoretical approach was performed to compare the results with previous studies. The lattice structures specimens were tested with quasi-static compression loading to examine its mechanical properties and then the relations between process-properties of FDM 3D printed lattice-structure were derived. The significant process parameters that influenced the mechanical performance as well as the geometrical properties for this particular FDM printer machine was found to be the layer thickness. The best mechanical performance of lattice structure was observed for that produced with 200 µm layer thickness as it gave a good agreement between the theoretical approach and experimental data analysis. With respect to the deformation behavior of the lattice structure in this study, the material is found to be more suitable in energy absorption applications such as in car engine hood or arm parts of the drone due to the bending dominated behavior when subjected to loading.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Rosli, Nur Ameelia
author_facet	Rosli, Nur Ameelia
author_sort	Rosli, Nur Ameelia
title	Effect Of Post Processing Parameters Andcompression Behavior On FDM 3D-Printed ABS Lattice-Structures
title_short	Effect Of Post Processing Parameters Andcompression Behavior On FDM 3D-Printed ABS Lattice-Structures
title_full	Effect Of Post Processing Parameters Andcompression Behavior On FDM 3D-Printed ABS Lattice-Structures
title_fullStr	Effect Of Post Processing Parameters Andcompression Behavior On FDM 3D-Printed ABS Lattice-Structures
title_full_unstemmed	Effect Of Post Processing Parameters Andcompression Behavior On FDM 3D-Printed ABS Lattice-Structures
title_sort	effect of post processing parameters andcompression behavior on fdm 3d-printed abs lattice-structures
granting_institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department	Faculty Of Mechanical Engieering
publishDate	2019
url	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24658/1/Effect%20Of%20Post%20Processing%20Parameters%20Andcompression%20Behavior%20On%20FDM%203D-Printed%20ABS%20Lattice-Structures.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24658/2/Effect%20Of%20Post%20Processing%20Parameters%20Andcompression%20Behavior%20On%20FDM%203D-Printed%20ABS%20Lattice-Structures.pdf
_version_	1747834081086799872
spelling	my-utem-ep.246582021-10-05T12:17:08Z Effect Of Post Processing Parameters Andcompression Behavior On FDM 3D-Printed ABS Lattice-Structures 2019 Rosli, Nur Ameelia TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) There is a growing development in lattice structure due to fundamental interest of the industries in producing parts with higher performance albeit with a low energy and cost consumption. Lattice structure is a periodic cellular structure which can serve the purpose of achieving lightweight parts with good mechanical properties. The complexity of manufacturing numerous types of lattice structures can be overcome by additive manufacturing (AM) process which offers better reliability and relatively simple procedure as compared to normal manufacturing. For the past decade, there are many studies on the lattice structure fabrication by AM. However, from literature, it is found that not many studies reported about the investigation on lattice structure by non-metallic, especially the ABS polymer. The use of ABS polymer to produce lattice structure serves as an added value for lightweight applications due to the lightweight characteristics of the ABS itself. The fused deposition modeling (FDM) 3D printed process of lattice structure is rarely reported in previous studies, hence it is difficult to confidently understand the behaviour of produced lattice structure by using combinations of FDM parameters. On top of that, there is limited information regarding the relationships between the pre-set parameters of CubePro’s mid- range FDM printed lattice structure with its mechanical properties. Therefore, this study characterized and examined the manufacturability of lattice structure geometry that was produced by FDM. The effect of process parameters of mid-range FDM 3D printer on the geometry of ABS lattice-structure were then evaluated. Later, the relationships between mechanical properties of ABS FDM 3D printed lattice structure with its geometry were derived by using experimental approach to justify the material as lightweight material. The CubePro 3D printer machine was utilized to fabricate the BCC lattice structure cube specimens with dimension of 20 x 20 x 20 mm3 with strut’s diameter sizes of 1.2 mm, 1.4 mm and 1.6 mm. Optical microscopy was used to characterize the printed lattice structures cube specimens. Theoretical approach was performed to compare the results with previous studies. The lattice structures specimens were tested with quasi-static compression loading to examine its mechanical properties and then the relations between process-properties of FDM 3D printed lattice-structure were derived. The significant process parameters that influenced the mechanical performance as well as the geometrical properties for this particular FDM printer machine was found to be the layer thickness. The best mechanical performance of lattice structure was observed for that produced with 200 µm layer thickness as it gave a good agreement between the theoretical approach and experimental data analysis. With respect to the deformation behavior of the lattice structure in this study, the material is found to be more suitable in energy absorption applications such as in car engine hood or arm parts of the drone due to the bending dominated behavior when subjected to loading. 2019 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24658/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24658/1/Effect%20Of%20Post%20Processing%20Parameters%20Andcompression%20Behavior%20On%20FDM%203D-Printed%20ABS%20Lattice-Structures.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24658/2/Effect%20Of%20Post%20Processing%20Parameters%20Andcompression%20Behavior%20On%20FDM%203D-Printed%20ABS%20Lattice-Structures.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=116910 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty Of Mechanical Engieering Hasan, Rafidah 1. 3D Systems Inc, 2014. CubePro Prosumer 3D Printer User Guide. 2. Abbott, T., 2014. Magnesium: Industrial and research developments over the last 15 years. Corrosion, the Journal of Science and Engineering, 71 (2), pp. 120–127. 3. Abele, E., Stoffregen, H.A., Klimkeit, K., Hoche, H., and Oechsner, M., 2015. Optimisation of process parameters for lattice structures. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 21 (1), pp. 117–127. 4. Afshar, M., Anaraki, A.P., Montazerian, H., and Kadkhodapour, J., 2016. Additive manufacturing and graded porosity scaffolds designed based on triply periodic minimal surface architectures. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 62, pp. 481–494. 5. Ahmadi, S.M., Campoli, G., Yavari, S.A., Sajadi, B., Wauthle, R., Schrooten, J., Weinans, H., and Zadpoor, A.A., 2014. Mechanical behavior of regular open-cell porous biomaterials made of diamond lattice unit cells. Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials, 34, pp. 106–115. 6. Ahn, D., Kweon, J.H., Kwon, S., Song, J., and Lee, S., 2009. Representation of surface roughness in fused deposition modeling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 209 (15–16), pp. 5593–5600. 7. Al-Ketan, O., Rowshan, R., and Abu Al-Rub, R.K., 2018. Topology-mechanical property relationship of 3d printed strut, skeletal, and sheet based periodic metallic cellular materials. Additive Manufacturing, 19, pp. 167–183. 8. Al-Saedi, D.S.J., Masood, S.H., Faizan-Ur-Rab, M., Alomarah, A., and Ponnusamy, P., 2018. Mechanical properties and energy absorption capability of functionally graded F2BCC lattice fabricated by SLM. Materials and Design, 144, pp. 32–44. 9. Alkhader, M. and Vural, M., 2008. Mechanical response of cellular solids: role of cellular topology and microstructural irregularity. International Journal of Engineering Science, 46 (10), pp. 1035–1051. 10. Alsalla, H., Hao, L., and Smith, C., 2016. Fracture toughness and tensile strength of 316l stainless steel cellular lattice structures manufactured using the selective laser melting technique. Materials Science and Engineering A, 669, pp. 1–6. 11. Anitha, R., Arunachalam, S., and Radhakrishnan, P., 2001. Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 118, pp. 2–5. 12. Anonymous, 2017. What’s the difference between an industrial 3D printer and a desktop 3D printer [online]. Available at: http://www.omni3d.com [Accessed 18 Jan 2019]. 13. Armani, M., 2017. What’s the difference between PLA, ABS and nylon? [online]. Available at: What’s the difference between PLA, ABS and nylon? [Accessed 2 Jan 2019]. 14. Ashby, M.F., 2013. Designing architectured materials. Scripta Materialia, 68 (1), pp. 4–7. 15. Ashby, M.F., 2006. The properties of foams and lattices. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 364 (1838), pp. 15–30. 16. Ashby, M.F., Cebon, D., Bream, C., Cesaretto, C., and Ball, N., 2011. A White Paper: The Hybrid Synthesizer. 17. Ashby, M.F., Evans, A.G., Fleck, N.A., Gibson, L.J., Hutchinson, J.W., and Wadley, H.N.G., 2000. Metal foams: A design guide. Elsevier. 18. Ashida, K. and Iwasaki, K., 1995. Thermosetting foams. In Handbook of Plastic Foams Types, Properties, Manufacture and Applications. William Andrew publishing, pp. 11–220. 19. Ataee, A., Li, Y., Fraser, D., Song, G., and Wen, C., 2018. Anisotropic Ti-6Al-4V gyroid scaffolds manufactured by electron beam melting (EBM) for bone implant applications. Materials and Design, 137, pp. 345–354. 20. Azman, A.H., 2017. Method for integration of lattice structures in design for additive manufacturing. Université Grenoble Alpes. 21. Bellehumeur, J.C., Li, L., Sun, Q., and Gu, P., 2004. Modeling of bond formation between polymer filaments in the Fused Deposition Modeling process. Journal of Manufacturing Process, 6 (2), pp. 170–178. 22. Brodin, H. and Saarimäki, J., 2013. Mechanical properties of lattice truss structures made of a selective laser melted superalloy, pp. 1–10. 23. Campanelli, S.L., Contuzzi, N., Ludovico, A.D., Caiazzo, F., Cardaropoli, F., and Sergi, V., 2014. Manufacturing and characterization of Ti6Al4V lattice components manufactured by selective laser melting. Materials, 7, pp. 4803–4822. 24. Campoli, G., Borleffs, M.S., Yavari, S.A., Wauthle, R., Weinans, H., and Zadpoor, A.A., 2013. Mechanical properties of open-cell metallic biomaterials manufactured using additive manufacturing. Materials and Design, 49, pp. 957–965. 25. Cansizoglu, O., Harrysson, O., Cormier, D., West, H., and Mahale, T., 2008. Properties of Ti–6Al–4V non-stochastic lattice structures fabricated via electron beam melting. Materials Science and Engineering A, 492, pp. 468–474. 26. Cao, X., Duan, S., Liang, J., Wen, W., and Fang, D., 2018. Mechanical properties of an improved 3D-printed rhombic dodecahedron stainless steel lattice structure of variable cross section. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 145, pp. 53–63. 27. Cerardi, A., Caneri, M., Meneghello, R., Concheri, G., and Ricotta, M., 2013. Mechanical characterization of polyamide cellular structures fabricated using selective laser sintering technologies. Materials and Design, 46, pp. 910–915. 28. Chatterjee, A.N., Kumar, S., Saha, P., Mishra, P.K., and Roy Choudhury, A., 2003. An experimental design approach to selective laser sintering of low carbon steel. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 136 (1–3), pp. 151–157. 29. Deshpande, V.S., Ashby, M.F., and Fleck, N.A., 2001a. Foam topology bending versus stretching dominated architectures. Acta Materialia, 49, pp. 1035–1040. 30. Deshpande, V.S., Fleck, N.A., and Ashby, M.F., 2001b. Effective properties of the octet-truss lattice material. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 49 (8), pp. 1747–1769. 31. Dong, G., Wijaya, G., Tang, Y., and Zhao, Y.F., 2018. Optimizing process parameters of fused deposition modeling by Taguchi method for the fabrication of lattice structures. Additive Manufacturing, 19, pp. 62–72. 32. Dong, G. and Zhao, Y.F., 2018. Numerical and experimental investigation of the joint stiffness in lattice structures fabricated by additive manufacturing. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 148, pp. 475–485. 33. Dong, L., Deshpande, V., and Wadley, H., 2015. Mechanical response of Ti-6Al-4V octet-truss lattice structures. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 60, pp. 107–124. 34. Eichenhofer, M., Wong, J.C.H., and Ermanni, P., 2017. Continuous lattice fabrication of ultra-lightweight composite structures. Additive Manufacturing, 18, pp. 48–57. 35. Erjavec, M., 2011. Mechanical Properties of Cellular Materials. Slovenia. 36. Esmaily, M., Svensson, J.E., Fajardo, S., Birbilis, N., Frankel, G.S., Virtanen, S., Arrabal, R., Thomas, S., and Johansson, L.G., 2017. Fundamentals and Advances in Magnesium Alloy Corrosion. Progress in Materials Science, 89, pp. 92–193. 37. Fan, H.L. and Fang, D.N., 2009. Enhancement of mechanical properties of hollow-strut foams: Analysis. Materials and Design, 30 (5), pp. 1659–1666. 38. Fan, H.L., Fang, D.N., and Jing, F.N., 2008. Yield surfaces and micro-failure mechanism of block lattice truss materials. Materials and Design, 29 (10), pp. 2038–2042. 39. Fan, H.L., Jin, F.N., and Fang, D.N., 2009. Nonlinear mechanical properties of lattice truss materials. Materials and Design, 30 (3), pp. 511–517. 40. Finnegan, K., Kooistraa, G., Wadleya, H.N.G., and Deshpande, V.S., 2007. The compressive response of carbon fiber composite pyramidal truss sandwich cores, 98, pp. 1–9. 41. Flynt, J., 2017. Acrylonitrile Butadiene Styrene (ABS): A tough and diverse plastic [online]. Available at: http://3dinsider.com [Accessed 18 Jan 2019]. 42. Garg, A., Bhattacharya, A., and Batish, A., 2016. On surface finish and dimensional accuracy of FDM parts after cold vapor treatment. Materials and Manufacturing Processes, 31 (4), pp. 522–529. 43. Gautam, R., Idapalapati, S., and Feih, S., 2018. Printing and. Materials and Design, 137, pp. 266–275. 44. Gibson, L.J. and Ashby, M.F., 1997. Cellular solids. MRS Bulletin. 45. Goodridge, R.D., Tuck, C.J., and Hague, R.J.M., 2012. Laser sintering of polyamides and other polymers. Progress in Materials Science, 57 (2), pp. 229–267. 46. Gorny, B., Niendorf, T., Lackmann, J., Thoene, M., Troester, T., and Maier, H.J., 2011. In situ characterization of the deformation and failure behavior of non-stochastic porous structures processed by selective laser melting. Materials Science and Engineering A, 528 (27), pp. 7962–7967. 47. Grunsven, W., Hernandez-Nava, E., Reilly, G., and Goodall, R., 2014. Fabrication and mechanical characterisation of titanium lattices with graded porosity. Metals, 4 (3), pp. 401–409. 48. Gümrük, R. and Mines, R.A.W., 2013. Compressive behaviour of stainless steel micro-lattice structures. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 68, pp. 125–139. 49. Gümrük, R., Mines, R.A.W., and Karadeniz, S., 2013. Static mechanical behaviours of stainless steel micro-lattice structures under different loading conditions. Materials Science and Engineering A, 586, pp. 392–406. 50. Gupta, A.P. and Kumar, V., 2007. New emerging trends in synthetic biodegradable polymers – polylactide: A critique. Eropean Polymer, 43, pp. 4053–4074. 51. Hammetter, C.I., 2013. Designing pyramidal lattice structures for energy absorption. University of California. 52. Hasan, R., Baharudin, M., and Nasarud’din, M., 2016. Fabrication of polymer lattice structure using additive manufacturing for lightweight material. In: Proceedings of Mechanical Engineering Research Day 2016. Melaka: Penerbit UTeM, pp. 129–130. 53. Hasan, R., 2013. Progressive collapse of titanium alloy micro-lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting. University of Liverpool. 54. Helms, H. and Lambrecht, U., 2007. The potential contribution of light-weighting to reduce transport energy consumption. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 12 (1), pp. 58–64. 55. Ho, M.P., Lau, K.T., Wang, H., and Hui, D., 2015. Improvement on the properties of polylactic acid (PLA) using bamboo charcoal particles. Composites Part B: Engineering, 81, pp. 14–25. 56. Horn, T.J., Harrysson, O.L.A., Marcellin-Little, D.J., West, H.A., Lascelles, B.D.X., and Aman, R., 2014. Flexural properties of Ti6Al4V rhombic dodecahedron open cellular structures fabricated with electron beam melting. Additive Manufacturing, 1, pp. 2–11. 57. Ibrahim, Y., Li, Z., Davies, C.M., Maharaj, C., Dear, J.P., and Hooper, P.A., 2018. Acoustic resonance testing of additive manufactured lattice structures. Additive Manufacturing, 24, pp. 566–576. 58. Ivanova, O.S., Williams, C.B., and Campbell, T.A., 2013. Additive manufacturing (AM) and nanotechnology: Promises and challenges. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 19 (5), pp. 353–364. 59. Jin, Y., Du, J., and He, Y., 2017. Optimization of process planning for reducing material consumption in additive manufacturing. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 44, pp. 65–78. 60. Khaderi, S.N., Deshpande, V.S., and Fleck, N.A., 2014. The stiffness and strength of the gyroid lattice. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 51 (23–24), pp. 3866–3877. 61. Kooistra, G.W., Queheillalt, D.T., and Wadley, H.N.G., 2008. Shear behavior of aluminum lattice truss sandwich panel structures, 472, pp. 242–250. 62. Kooistra, G.W. and Wadley, H.N.G., 2007. Lattice truss structures from expanded metal sheet. Materials and Design, 28 (2), pp. 507–514. 63. Kromm, F., Quenisset, J., Harry, R., and Larriot, T., 2002. An example of multimaterials design. Advanced Engineering Materials, 4 (6), pp. 371–374. 64. Kruth, J., Levy, G., Klocke, F., and Childs, T.H.C., 2007. Consolidation phenomena in laser and powder-bed based layered manufacturing, 56 (1), pp. 730–759. 65. Kruth, J.P., 1991. Material incress manufacturing by rapid prototyping techniques. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology, 40 (2), pp. 603–614. 66. Kude, V.P. and Khairnar, R.S., 2004. Fabrication of silicon based glass fibres for optical communication. Bulletin of Materials Science, 27(1), pp.73-77. 67. Kun, K., 2016. Reconstruction and development of a 3D printer using FDM technology. Procedia Engineering, 149, pp. 203–211. 68. Li, C., Lei, H., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Xiong, J., Zhou, H., and Fang, D., 2018. Crushing behavior of multi-layer metal lattice panel fabricated by selective laser melting. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 145, pp. 389–399. 69. Lim, C.H., Jeon, I., and Kang, K.J., 2009. A new type of sandwich panel with periodic cellular metal cores and its mechanical performances. Materials and Design, 30 (8), pp. 3082–3093. 70. Lim, W.J., 2016. Effects of build angle on strength of polymer latice structure manufactured using 3D printer. Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka, Malaysia. 71. Luxner, M.H., Stampfl, J., and Pettermann, H.E., 2005. Finite element modeling concepts and linear analyses of 3D regular open cell structures. Journal of Materials Science, 40, pp. 5859–5866. 72. Maskery, I., Aboulkhair, N.T., Aremu, A.O., Tuck, C.J., Ashcroft, I.A., Wildman, R.D., and Hague, R.J.M., 2016a. A mechanical property evaluation of graded density Al-Si10-Mg lattice structures manufactured by selective laser melting. Materials Science and Engineering A, 670, pp. 264–274. 73. Maskery, I., Aremu, A.O., Parry, L., Wildman, R.D., Tuck, C.J., and Ashcroft, I.A., 2018a. Effective design and simulation of surface-based lattice structures featuring volume fraction and cell type grading. Materials and Design, 155, pp. 220–232. 74. Maskery, I., Hussey, A., Panesar, A., Aremu, A., Tuck, C., Ashcroft, I., and Hague, R., 2016b. An investigation into reinforced and functionally graded lattice structures. Journal of Cellular Plastics, 53 (2). 75. Maskery, I., Sturm, L., Aremu, A.O., Panesar, A., Williams, C.B., Tuck, C.J., Wildman, R.D., Ashcroft, I.A., and Hague, R.J.M., 2018b. Insights into the mechanical properties of several triply periodic minimal surface lattice structures made by polymer additive manufacturing. Polymer, 152, pp. 62–71. 76. McKown, S., Shen, Y., Brookes, W.K., Sutcliffe, C.J., Cantwell, W.J., Langdon, G.S., Nurick, G.N., and Theobald, M.D., 2008. The quasi-static and blast loading response of lattice structures. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 35 (8), pp. 795–810. 77. Mines, R.A.W., Tsopanos, S., Shen, E., McKown, S., Cantwell, W.J., Brooks, W., and Sutcliffe, C., 2009. On the performance of micro lattice structures as core materials in sandwich panels subject to low velocity impact. Strain, pp. 27–31. 78. Morrish, S.J.N., Pedersen, M., Wong, K.F.W., Todd, I., and Goodall, R., 2017. Size effects in compression in electron beam melted Ti6Al4V diamond structure lattices. Materials Letters, 190, pp. 138–142. 79. Mostafa, K.G., Montemagno, C., and Qureshi, A.J., 2018. Strength to cost ratio analysis of FDM nylon 12 3D printed parts. Procedia Manufacturing, 26, pp. 753–762. 80. Mun, J., Yun, B.G., Ju, J., and Chang, B.M., 2015. Indirect additive manufacturing based casting of a periodic 3D cellular metal - Flow simulation of molten aluminum alloy. Journal of Manufacturing Processes, 17, pp. 28–40. 81. Narang, R. and Chhabra, D., 2017. Analysis of process parameters of fused deposition modeling (FDM) technique. International Journal on Future Revolution in Computer Science and Communication Engineering IJFRCSCE, 3 (10), pp. 41–48. 82. Ngo, T.D., Kashani, A., Imbalzano, G., Nguyen, K.T.Q., and Hui, D., 2018. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Composites Part B: Engineering, 143, pp. 172–196. 83. Qiu, C., Yue, S., Adkins, N.J.E., Ward, M., Hassanin, H., Lee, P.D., Withers, P.J., and Attallah, M.M., 2015. Influence of processing conditions on strut structure and compressive properties of cellular lattice structures fabricated by selective laser melting. Materials Science and Engineering A, 628, pp. 188–197. 84. Rashed, M.G., Ashraf, M., Mines, R.A.W., and Hazell, P.J., 2016. Metallic microlattice materials: A current state of the art on manufacturing, mechanical properties and applications. Materials and Design, 95, pp. 518–533. 85. Ravari, M.R.K. and Kadkhodaei, M., 2013. Finite element modeling of the elastic modulus of Ti6Al4V scaffold fabricated by SLM. Vienna: ASCE. 86. Ravari, M.R.K., Kadkhodaei, M., Badrossamay, M., and Rezaei, R., 2014. Numerical investigation on mechanical properties of cellular lattice structures fabricated by fused deposition modeling. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 88, pp. 154–161. 87. Rehme, O., 2010. Cellular design for laser freeform fabrication. Gottingen, Cuvilier. 88. Santorinaios, M., Brooks, W., Sutcliffe, C.J., and Mines, R.A.W., 2006. Crush behaviour of open cellular lattice structures manufactured using selective laser melting. High Performance Structures and Materials III, 85, pp. 481–490. 89. Shen, Y., McKown, S., Tsopanos, S., Sutcliffe, C.J., Mines, R.A.W., and Cantwell, W.J., 2010. The mechanical properties of sandwich structures based on metal lattice architectures. Journal of Sandwich Structures and Materials, 12 (2), pp. 159–180. 90. Shih, Y., Huang, C., and Chen, P., 2010. Biodegradable green composites reinforced by the fiber recycling from disposable chopsticks. Materials Science and Engineering A, 527, pp. 1516–1521. 91. Skelly, J., 2008. Decorative plating processes for common plastic resins: resin selection as well as plastic part design is critical to matching the right finishing method with the intended application. Metal Finishing, 106 (6), pp. 61–65. 92. Smith, M., Guan, Z., and Cantwell, W.J., 2013. Finite element modelling of the compressive response of lattice structures manufactured using the selective laser melting technique. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 67, pp. 28–41. 93. Soo, V.K., Compston, P., and Doolan, M., 2015. Interaction between new car design and recycling impact on life cycle assessment. Procedia CIRP, 29, pp. 426–431. 94. Strano, G., Hao, L., Everson, R.M., and Evans, K.E., 2013. A new approach to the design and optimisation of support structures in additive manufacturing. International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 66, pp. 1247–1254. 95. Suard, M., 2015. Characterization and optimization of lattice structures made by electron beam melting. University of Grenoble. 96. Sukwisute, P., Sakdanuphab, R., and Sakulkalavek, A., 2017. Hardness and wear resistance improvement of ABS surface by CrN thin film. Materials Today: Proceedings, 4 (5), pp. 6553–6561. 97. Syam, W.P., Jianwei, W., Zhao, B., Maskery, I., Elmadih, W., and Leach, R., 2018. Design and analysis of strut-based lattice structures for vibration isolation. Precision Engineering, 52, pp. 494–506. 98. Taib, Z.A.M, Harun, W.S.W., Ghani, S.A.C., Ab Rashid, M.F.F., Omar, M.A. and Ramli, H., 2016. Dimensional accuracy study of open cellular structure CoCrMo alloy fabricated by selective laser melting process. Advanced Materials Research, 1133, pp. 280-284. 99. Tang, X., Cao, M., Bi, C., Yan, L., and Zhang, B., 2008. Research on a new surface activation process for electroless plating on ABS plastic. Materials Letters, 62, pp. 1089–1091. 100. Teixera, L.A.C. and Santini, M.C., 2005. Surface conditioning of ABS for metallization without the use of chromium baths. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 170, pp. 37–41. 101. Tisza, M. and Czinege, I., 2018. Comparative study of the application of steels and aluminium in lightweight production of automotive parts. International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture, 1 (4), pp. 229–238. 102. Tsopanos, S., Mines, R.A.W., McKown, S., Shen, Y., Cantwell, W.J., Brooks, W., and Sutcliffe, C.J., 2010. The influence of processing parameters on the mechanical properties of selectively laser melted stainless steel microlattice structures. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering, 132 (4), pp. 1–12. 103. Ushijima, K., Cantwell, W.J., and Chen, D.H., 2013. Prediction of the mechanical properties of micro-lattice structures subjected to multi-axial loading. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, 68, pp. 47–55. 104. Ushijima, K., Cantwell, W.J., and Chen, D.H., 2010a. Evaluation of the mechanical properties of lightweight lattice structures subjected to compressive loading part i : Analytical approach for the initial stiffness and plastic collapse strength. Journal of Computational Science and Technology, 4 (3), pp. 159–171. 105. Ushijima, K., Tsopanos, S., and Smith, M., 2010b. An investigation into the compressive properties of stainless steel micro-lattice structures. Journal of Sandwich Sructures and Materials, 13 (3), pp. 303–329. 106. Varotsis, A.B., 2019. Industrial FDM vs. Desktop FDM [online]. Available at: www.3dhubs.com [Accessed 13 Jan 2019]. 107. Wadley, H., Dharmasena, K., Chen, Y., Dudt, P., Knight, D., Charette, R., and Kiddy, K., 2008. Compressive response of multilayered pyramidal lattices during underwater shock loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 35 (9), pp. 1102–1114. 108. Wadley, H.N.G., Fleck, N.A., and Evans, A.G., 2003. Fabrication and structural performance of periodic cellular metal sandwich structures. Composites Science and Technology, 63 (16), pp. 2331–2343. 109. Wang, A. and Mcdowell, D.L., 2004. In-plane stiffness and yield strength of periodic metal honeycombs. Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology, 126 (2), pp. 137–156. 110. Wong, K. V and Hernandez, A., 2012. A review of additive manufacturing. ISRN Mechanical Engineering, 2012. 111. Wu, H., Sulkis, M., Driver, J., Saade-Castillo, A., Thompson, A., and Koo, J.H., 2018. Multi-functional ULTEMTM1010 composite filaments for additive manufacturing using fused filament fabrication (FFF). Additive Manufacturing, 24, pp. 298–306. 112. Xiao, L., Song, W., Cheng, W., Huiping, T., Qunbo, F., Nan, L., and Jianzhong, W., 2017. Mechanical properties of open-cell rhombic dodecahedron titanium alloy lattice structure manufactured using electron beam melting under dynamic loading. International Journal of Impact Engineering, 100, pp. 75–89. 113. Yan, C., Hao, L., Hussein, A., Lawrence, S., Young, P., and Raymont, D., 2014. Evaluation of light-weight AlSi10Mg periodic cellular lattice structures fabricated via direct metal laser sintering. Journal of Materials Processing Technology, 214 (4), pp. 856–864. 114. Yánez, A., Cuadrado, A., Martel, O., Afonso, H., and Monopoli, D., 2018. Gyroid porous titanium structures: A versatile solution to be used as scaffolds in bone defect reconstruction. Materials and Design, 140, pp. 21–29. 115. Yang, L., Harrysson, O., West II, H., and Cormier, D., 2012. Design and characterization of orthotropic re-entrant auxetic structures made via EBM using Ti6Al4V and pure copper. Acta Materialia, 60, pp. 3370–3379. 116. Yap, C.Y., Chua, C.K., Dong, Z.L., Liu, Z.H., Zhang, D.Q., Loh, L.E., and Sing, S.L., 2015. Review of selective laser melting: Materials and applications. Applied Physics Reviews, 2 (4), pp. 1–21. 117. Yin, S., Chen, H., Wu, Y., Li, Y., and Xu, J., 2018. Introducing composite lattice core sandwich structure as an alternative proposal for engine hood. Composite Structures, 201, pp. 131–140. 118. You, X., Yang, J., Feng, Q., Huang, K., Zhou, H., Hu, J., and Dong, S., 2018. Three-dimensional graphene-based materials by direct ink writing method for lightweight application. International Journal of Lightweight Materials and Manufacture, 1 (2), pp. 96–101. 119. Zaiß, M., Demmerle, J., Oergele, J.N., and Lanza, G., 2017. New concepts for quality assurance of lightweight material. Procedia CIRP, 66, pp. 259–264. 120. Zaldivar, R.J., Witkin, D.B., McLouth, T., Patel, D.N., Schmitt, K., and Nokes, J.P., 2017. Influence of processing and orientation print effects on the mechanical and thermal behavior of 3D-printed ULTEM®9085 material. Additive Manufacturing, 13, pp. 71–80. 121. Zhang, G., Ma, L., Wang, B., and Wu, L., 2012. Mechanical Behaviour of CFRP Sandwich Structures with Tetrahedral Lattice Truss Cores. Composites Part B: Engineering, 43 (2), pp. 471–476. 122. Zhou, J., Shrotriya, P., and Soboyejo, W.O., 2004. On the deformation of aluminum lattice block structures: From struts to structures. Mechanics of Materials, 36 (8), pp. 723–737.

Effect Of Post Processing Parameters Andcompression Behavior On FDM 3D-Printed ABS Lattice-Structures

Similar Items