Adaptive Trajectory Generation For Vision-Based Robot Using Negotiation Principle For Rehabilitation Applications

Adaptive behaviour in a robotic system is highly desired in an application that requires a robot to negotiate and adapt its role to the overall goal. For example, in an autonomous hand rehabilitation application, the robot must concern on the safety and comfort of a patient when guiding the rehab ex...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Rasid, Farah Amirah
Format: Thesis
Language:English
English
Published: 2019
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24716/1/Adaptive%20Trajectory%20Generation%20For%20Vision-Based%20Robot%20Using%20Negotiation%20Principle%20For%20Rehabilitation%20Applications.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24716/2/Adaptive%20Trajectory%20Generation%20For%20Vision-Based%20Robot%20Using%20Negotiation%20Principle%20For%20Rehabilitation%20Applications.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utem-ep.24716
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection UTeM Repository
language English
English
topic TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
spellingShingle TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery
Rasid, Farah Amirah
Adaptive Trajectory Generation For Vision-Based Robot Using Negotiation Principle For Rehabilitation Applications
description Adaptive behaviour in a robotic system is highly desired in an application that requires a robot to negotiate and adapt its role to the overall goal. For example, in an autonomous hand rehabilitation application, the robot must concern on the safety and comfort of a patient when guiding the rehab exercise and the robot must also be able to motivate patient to gradually improve his motion to achieve recovery. Therefore, this research focuses in solving the problem by adjusting the robot's trajectory automatically to suit changing patient’s requirement while considering the planned trajectory. To solve the problem, it is hypothesized that persuasion tactic based on negotiation principle approach can solve the conflict in motion coordination and lead the patient towards the initial planned trajectory. The objectives for this research are to design and develop an adaptive trajectory algorithm with a persuasion tactic based on negotiation principles and to validate the proposed algorithm in terms of automated negotiation point of view. A persuasion tactic is proposed to represent the action of persuasion. Three types of experiments were conducted to validate the proposed method. The first experiment is to study the effect of using negotiation principle without persuasion tactic on the trajectory of a robot. The second experiment is to investigate the effect of using negotiation principle with persuasion tactic on the trajectory of a robot (single input). The third experiment is to examine the effect of using negotiation principle with persuasion tactic on the trajectory of a robot (multi-input). The result of the experiment is analyzed based on a negotiation perspective in terms of negotiated trajectory, the success rate of negotiation, utility, and equality. The result shows that the success rate of negotiation with persuasion tactic is higher than without persuasion tactic which is 91.1%. The result also shows that the utility of the robot is higher than human which are 0.63 (single input) and 0.52 (multi-input). In conclusion, the presented persuasion tactic based on negotiation principle to coordinate motion between robot and human serves as a method that fills the gap in the robotic system which does not consider its initial planned trajectory and totally follows the human requirement.
format Thesis
qualification_name Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level Master's degree
author Rasid, Farah Amirah
author_facet Rasid, Farah Amirah
author_sort Rasid, Farah Amirah
title Adaptive Trajectory Generation For Vision-Based Robot Using Negotiation Principle For Rehabilitation Applications
title_short Adaptive Trajectory Generation For Vision-Based Robot Using Negotiation Principle For Rehabilitation Applications
title_full Adaptive Trajectory Generation For Vision-Based Robot Using Negotiation Principle For Rehabilitation Applications
title_fullStr Adaptive Trajectory Generation For Vision-Based Robot Using Negotiation Principle For Rehabilitation Applications
title_full_unstemmed Adaptive Trajectory Generation For Vision-Based Robot Using Negotiation Principle For Rehabilitation Applications
title_sort adaptive trajectory generation for vision-based robot using negotiation principle for rehabilitation applications
granting_institution Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department Faculty of Electrical Engineering
publishDate 2019
url http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24716/1/Adaptive%20Trajectory%20Generation%20For%20Vision-Based%20Robot%20Using%20Negotiation%20Principle%20For%20Rehabilitation%20Applications.pdf
http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24716/2/Adaptive%20Trajectory%20Generation%20For%20Vision-Based%20Robot%20Using%20Negotiation%20Principle%20For%20Rehabilitation%20Applications.pdf
_version_ 1747834094238040064
spelling my-utem-ep.247162021-10-05T12:44:47Z Adaptive Trajectory Generation For Vision-Based Robot Using Negotiation Principle For Rehabilitation Applications 2019 Rasid, Farah Amirah TJ Mechanical engineering and machinery Adaptive behaviour in a robotic system is highly desired in an application that requires a robot to negotiate and adapt its role to the overall goal. For example, in an autonomous hand rehabilitation application, the robot must concern on the safety and comfort of a patient when guiding the rehab exercise and the robot must also be able to motivate patient to gradually improve his motion to achieve recovery. Therefore, this research focuses in solving the problem by adjusting the robot's trajectory automatically to suit changing patient’s requirement while considering the planned trajectory. To solve the problem, it is hypothesized that persuasion tactic based on negotiation principle approach can solve the conflict in motion coordination and lead the patient towards the initial planned trajectory. The objectives for this research are to design and develop an adaptive trajectory algorithm with a persuasion tactic based on negotiation principles and to validate the proposed algorithm in terms of automated negotiation point of view. A persuasion tactic is proposed to represent the action of persuasion. Three types of experiments were conducted to validate the proposed method. The first experiment is to study the effect of using negotiation principle without persuasion tactic on the trajectory of a robot. The second experiment is to investigate the effect of using negotiation principle with persuasion tactic on the trajectory of a robot (single input). The third experiment is to examine the effect of using negotiation principle with persuasion tactic on the trajectory of a robot (multi-input). The result of the experiment is analyzed based on a negotiation perspective in terms of negotiated trajectory, the success rate of negotiation, utility, and equality. The result shows that the success rate of negotiation with persuasion tactic is higher than without persuasion tactic which is 91.1%. The result also shows that the utility of the robot is higher than human which are 0.63 (single input) and 0.52 (multi-input). In conclusion, the presented persuasion tactic based on negotiation principle to coordinate motion between robot and human serves as a method that fills the gap in the robotic system which does not consider its initial planned trajectory and totally follows the human requirement. 2019 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24716/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24716/1/Adaptive%20Trajectory%20Generation%20For%20Vision-Based%20Robot%20Using%20Negotiation%20Principle%20For%20Rehabilitation%20Applications.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24716/2/Adaptive%20Trajectory%20Generation%20For%20Vision-Based%20Robot%20Using%20Negotiation%20Principle%20For%20Rehabilitation%20Applications.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=116878 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty of Electrical Engineering 1. Adela, M. 2002. Negotiation as A Process of Communication, UCSF Economics series pp.135–140. 2. Baarslag, T., Hindriks, K., and Jonker, C. 2014. Effective Acceptance Conditions in Real-Time Automated Negotiation. Decision Support Systems, 60(1), pp.68–77. 3. Bao, Q., Hieu, T., Hong, T., and Nguyen, K. 2016. On the Use of Surplus Division to Facilitate Efficient Negotiation in The Presence of Incomplete Information. Procedia - Procedia Computer Science, 96, pp.295–304. 4. Barnes, G. P. 2006. Successful Negotiating: Letting the Other Person Have Your Way (2006 Advan). Advantage Quest Publications. 5. Brown Leyton, K. yoav S. 2008. Essentials of Game Theory. (R. J. Brachman and T. Dietterich, Eds.). Morgan and Claypool Publisher. 6. Calinon, S., and Evrard, P. 2009. Learning Collaborative Manipulation Tasks by Demonstration Using A Haptic Interface. International Conference on Advanced Robotics, pp.1–6. 7. Chen, Z., B, P. L., Pan, S., and Xu, J. 2018. A Negotiation-Based Collision Avoidance. In ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2018. China: Springer International Publishing. pp. 331–340. 8. Cheng, C., Chan, C. H., and Lin, K. 2006. Intelligent Agents For E-Marketplace: Negotiation with Issue Trade-Offs by Fuzzy Inference Systems, 42, pp.626–638. 9. Chiou, E. K., Lee, J. D., and Su, T. 2019. Computers in Human Behavior Negotiated and Reciprocal Exchange Structures in Human-Agent Cooperation. Computers in Human Behavior, 90, pp.288–297. 10. Cruz-maya, A., and Tapus, A. 2018. Negotiating with a robot: Analysis of Regulatory Focus Behavior. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp. 4578–4584. 11. Cui, L., and Fang, C. 2019. Reliability-Game Theory. In Advances in System Reliability Engineering, pp. 77–115. 12. Cui, R., Guo, J., Gao, B., Cui, R., Guo, J., and Gao, B. 2013. Game Theory-Based Negotiation for Multiple Robots Task Allocation. Robotica, pp.923–934. 13. Das, P. 2009. Upper Limb Training. Retrieved December 25, 2017, from https://www.physiotherapy-treatment.com/stroke-physical-therapy.html 14. Diaz Fernandez, M., Bornay Barrachina, M., and Lopez Cabrales, A. 2015. Evidence-Based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship. Evidence-Based HRM: A Global Forum for Empirical Scholarship, 3(1), pp.64–80. 15. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., and Jennings, N. R. 1998. Negotiation Decision Functions for Autonomous Agents. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 24(3–4), pp.159–182. 16. Faratin, P., Sierra, C., and Jennings, N. R. 2002. Using Similarity Criteria To Make Issue Trade-Offs in Automated Negotiations. Artificial Intelligence, 142(2), pp.205–237. 17. Fatima, S. S., Wooldridge, M., and Jennings, N. R. 2002. Multi-Issue Negotiation Under Time Constraints. In AAMAS’02 pp. 143–150. 18. Fischer, R., Ury, W., and Patton, B. 1981. Getting to Yes Negotiating an Agreement without Giving In. 2nd edition, Random House Business Books. 19. Gabler, V., Stahl, T., Huber, G., Oguz, O., and Wollherr, D. 2017. A Game-Theoretic Approach for Adaptive Action Selection In Close Proximity Human-Robot-Collaboration. 2017 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), pp.2897–2903. 20. Gwak, J., and Sim, K. M. 2011. Bayesian Learning based Negotiation Agents for Supporting Negotiation with Incomplete Information. In Proceeding of the International MultiConference of Engineers and Computer Scientists 2011 Vol I IMECS 2011, (Vol. I), pp.1-6. 21. Hernández, E., Barrientos, A., and Cerro, J. 2013. Expert Systems with Applications Selective Smooth Fictitious Play: An Approach Based on Game Theory for Patrolling Infrastructures with A Multi-Robot System. Expert Systems with Applications, pp.1-17. 22. Huang, X., and Hallam, J. 1995. Spring-Based Negotiation for Conflict Resolution in AGV Scheduling. In Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1995. Intelligent Systems for the 21st Century., IEEE International Conference on, pp. 789–794. 23. J. Srinivas, R.V. Dukkipati, K. R. 2009. Robotics: Control and Programming. 1st ed., Alpha Science Intl Ltd. 24. Jennings, N. R., Faratin, P., Lomuscio, A. R., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M., and Sierra, C. 2001. Automated Negotiation: Prospects, Methods and Challenges. Group Decision and Negotiation, 10(Wooldridge 1997), pp.199-215. 25. Keiser, B. 2013. Torque Control of a KUKA youBot Arm. University of Zurich. 26. Kumar, Y. 2016. Can a Principle Negotiations Framework Explain The Participant’s Strategies and Outcomes in The 1884-1885 Berlin Conference 2015. UNSW Law Journal,16-02, pp.1-24. 27. Liu, J., Cramer, S. C., and Reinkensmeyer, D. J. 2006. Learning to Perform A New Movement with Robotic Assistance: Comparison of Haptic Guidance and Visual Demonstration. Journal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation, 3(20), pp.1-10. 28. Lopes, F., Wooldridge, M., and Novais, A. Q. 2008. Negotiation Among Autonomous Computational Agents: Principles, Analysis and Challenges. Artificial Intelligence Review, 29(1), pp.1–44. 29. Lopez, M. G., Hasegawa, K., and Imai, M. 2017. Adaptive Behavior Generation for Conversational Robot in Human-Robot Negotiation Environment. In HAI ’17, pp. 151–159. 30. Maeda, G., Maloo, A., Ewerton, M., Lioutikov, R., and Peters, J. 2016. Anticipative Interaction Primitives for Human-Robot Collaboration. In 2016 AAAI Fall Symposium Series: Shared Autonomy in Research and Practice, pp. 325–330. 31. Marey, O., Bentahar, J., Asl, E. K., Mbarki, M., and Dssouli, R. 2014. Agents’ Uncertainty in Argumentation-Based Negotiation: Classification and Implementation. Procedia Computer Science, 32, pp.61–68. 32. Menezes, T., Tedesco, P., and Ramalho, G. 2006. LNAI 4140 - Negotiator Agents for the Patrolling Task. Advances in Artificial Intelligence - IBERAMIA-SBIA 2006, pp.48–57. 33. Mukhopadhyay, D., Vij, S., and Bala, M. I. 2015. Automated Negotiation with Behaviour Prediction. International Journal of Internet Protocol Technology, pp.44-50. 34. Nardi, S., Mazzitelli, F., and Pallottino, L. 2018. A Game Theoretic Robotic Team Coordination Protocol for Intruder Herding. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, PP(c), pp.1-8. 35. Nazarova, A. V, and Zhai, M. 2019. Distributed Solution of Problems in Multi Agent Robotic Systems. Smart Electromechanical Systems, Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 174, pp.107–124. 36. Oguz, S. O., Kucukyilmaz, A., Metin Sezgin, T., and Basdogan, C. 2012. Supporting Negotiation Behavior with Haptics-Enabled Human-Computer Interfaces. IEEE Transactions on Haptics, 5(3), pp.274–284. 37. Patton, J. L., and Mussa Ivaldi, F. A. 2004. Robot-Assisted Adaptive Training: Custom Force Fields for Teaching Movement Patterns. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 51(4), pp.636–646. 38. Pérula martínez, R., Castro gonzález, Á., Malfaz, M., and Salichs, M. A. 2018. Bioinspired Decision-Making for a Socially Interactive Robot Bioinspired Decision-Making for a Socially Interactive Robot. Cognitive Systems Research, pp.1-40. 39. Provis, C. 2004. Negotiation, Persuasion and Argument. Argumentation, 18(1), pp.95–112. 40. Raiffa, H. 1985. The Art and Science of Negotiation. Harvard University Press. 41. Rajavel, R., and Thangarathanam, M. 2016. Adaptive Probabilistic Behavioural Learning System for The Effective Behavioural Decision in Cloud Trading Negotiation Market. Future Generation Computer Systems, 58, pp.29–41. 42. Ren, F., and Zhang, M. 2014. A Single-Issue Negotiation Model for Agents Bargaining in Dynamic Electronic Markets. Decision Support Systems, 60(1), pp.55–67. 43. Ren, F., Zhang, M., and Sim, K. M. 2009. Adaptive Conceding Strategies for Automated Trading Agents in Dynamic, Open Markets. Decision Support Systems, pp.704-716. 44. Roy, S., and Edan, Y. 2018. Investigating Joint-Action in Short-Cycle Repetitive Handover Tasks: The Role of Giver Versus Receiver and its Implications for Human-Robot Collaborative System Design. International Journal of Social Robotics, pp.1-16. 45. Saha, S., and Sen, S. 2006. Negotiating Efficient Outcomes Over Multiple Issues. Proceedings of the Fifth International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems - AAMAS ’06, pp.423-433. 46. Sanguineti, V., and Burdet, E. 2014. Slaves No Longer: Review on Role Assignment for Human – Robot Joint Motor Action. Adaptive Behaviour, 22(1), pp.70–82. 47. Squeri, V., Masia, L., Giannoni, P., Sandini, G., and Morasso, P. 2013. Wrist Rehabilitation in Chronic Stroke Patients by Means of Adaptive, Progressive Robot Aided Therapy. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, Early Acce(2), pp.312–325. 48. Sujit, P. B., Sinha, A., and Ghose, D. 2007. Team, Game, and Negotiation Based Intelligent Autonomous UAV Task Allocation for Wide. Studies in Computational Intelligence (SCI), 75(70), pp.39–75. 49. Sycara, K. 1990. Negotiation Planning: An AI Approach. European Journal of Operational Research,46, pp.216–234. 50. Sycara, K., and Dai, T. 2010. Agent Reasoning in Negotiation. Handbook of Group Decision and Negotiation, 4, pp.437–451. 51. Wang, G., Wong, T. N., and Yu, C. 2011. Computational Method for Agent-Based E-Commerce Negotiations with Adaptive Negotiation Behaviors, Procedia Computer Science,4, pp.1834–1843. 52. Williams, C. R., Robu, V., Gerding, E. H., and Jennings, N. R. 2011. Using Gaussian Processes to Optimize Concession in Complex Negotiations Against Unknown Opponents. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence IJCAI, pp.432–438. 53. Zeng, D., and Sycara, K. 1997. Benefits of Learning in Negotiation. Proceedings of the Fourteenth National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Ninth Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI’97/IAAI’97), 1, pp.36–41. 54. Zohar, I. 2015. "The Art of Negotiation" Leadership Skills Required for Negotiation in Time of Crisis. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 209, pp.540–548.