Development And Evaluation Of Customized Pes Planus Orthotic Insole Using Additive Manufacturing

Pes planus (also known as flat feet) orthotic insole designed to support, correct the deformities and improve the movement of joints or limbs. The custom orthotic insole can fit the patient’s body and perform better than off-the-shelf insoles. Due to the large range of dimensions characteristic for...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Mohamad, Azlinda
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English English
Published:	2019
Subjects:	T Technology (General) TS Manufactures
Online Access:	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24940/1/Development%20And%20Evaluation%20Of%20Customized%20Pes%20Planus%20Orthotic%20Insole%20Using%20Additive%20Manufacturing.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24940/2/Development%20And%20Evaluation%20Of%20Customized%20Pes%20Planus%20Orthotic%20Insole%20Using%20Additive%20Manufacturing.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-utem-ep.24940
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection	UTeM Repository
language	English English
advisor	Abdullah, Zulkeflee
topic	T Technology (General) TS Manufactures
spellingShingle	T Technology (General) TS Manufactures Mohamad, Azlinda Development And Evaluation Of Customized Pes Planus Orthotic Insole Using Additive Manufacturing
description	Pes planus (also known as flat feet) orthotic insole designed to support, correct the deformities and improve the movement of joints or limbs. The custom orthotic insole can fit the patient’s body and perform better than off-the-shelf insoles. Due to the large range of dimensions characteristic for each individual, a mass production is not suitable for the custom insole productions. For this reason, it is necessary to consider another approach, such as additive manufacturing. The purpose of this study is to develop a personal orthotic Pes Planus insole using Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM). Customized fabrication of orthotic insole using FDM has been through six main steps: Pes Planus feet screening, 3D scanning of the anatomic surface, feet 3D surface reconstruction and modification, insole 3D modeling and converting to STL format and finally fabricating using FDM machine. Evaluation by a medical practitioner was conducted at the end of the study for the purpose of obtaining feedback from the expert and ensuring the insole's ability to correct Pes Planus feet. The most suitable material in the insole production is TPU. This technique will contribute to better orthotic planus insole in terms of reducing manufacturing time, economic and personal at the patient's foot, rather than conventional methods that need to go through the mold manufacturing process in advance.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Mohamad, Azlinda
author_facet	Mohamad, Azlinda
author_sort	Mohamad, Azlinda
title	Development And Evaluation Of Customized Pes Planus Orthotic Insole Using Additive Manufacturing
title_short	Development And Evaluation Of Customized Pes Planus Orthotic Insole Using Additive Manufacturing
title_full	Development And Evaluation Of Customized Pes Planus Orthotic Insole Using Additive Manufacturing
title_fullStr	Development And Evaluation Of Customized Pes Planus Orthotic Insole Using Additive Manufacturing
title_full_unstemmed	Development And Evaluation Of Customized Pes Planus Orthotic Insole Using Additive Manufacturing
title_sort	development and evaluation of customized pes planus orthotic insole using additive manufacturing
granting_institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department	Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering
publishDate	2019
url	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24940/1/Development%20And%20Evaluation%20Of%20Customized%20Pes%20Planus%20Orthotic%20Insole%20Using%20Additive%20Manufacturing.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24940/2/Development%20And%20Evaluation%20Of%20Customized%20Pes%20Planus%20Orthotic%20Insole%20Using%20Additive%20Manufacturing.pdf
_version_	1747834101787787264
spelling	my-utem-ep.249402021-09-29T12:07:33Z Development And Evaluation Of Customized Pes Planus Orthotic Insole Using Additive Manufacturing 2019 Mohamad, Azlinda T Technology (General) TS Manufactures Pes planus (also known as flat feet) orthotic insole designed to support, correct the deformities and improve the movement of joints or limbs. The custom orthotic insole can fit the patient’s body and perform better than off-the-shelf insoles. Due to the large range of dimensions characteristic for each individual, a mass production is not suitable for the custom insole productions. For this reason, it is necessary to consider another approach, such as additive manufacturing. The purpose of this study is to develop a personal orthotic Pes Planus insole using Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM). Customized fabrication of orthotic insole using FDM has been through six main steps: Pes Planus feet screening, 3D scanning of the anatomic surface, feet 3D surface reconstruction and modification, insole 3D modeling and converting to STL format and finally fabricating using FDM machine. Evaluation by a medical practitioner was conducted at the end of the study for the purpose of obtaining feedback from the expert and ensuring the insole's ability to correct Pes Planus feet. The most suitable material in the insole production is TPU. This technique will contribute to better orthotic planus insole in terms of reducing manufacturing time, economic and personal at the patient's foot, rather than conventional methods that need to go through the mold manufacturing process in advance. 2019 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24940/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24940/1/Development%20And%20Evaluation%20Of%20Customized%20Pes%20Planus%20Orthotic%20Insole%20Using%20Additive%20Manufacturing.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/24940/2/Development%20And%20Evaluation%20Of%20Customized%20Pes%20Planus%20Orthotic%20Insole%20Using%20Additive%20Manufacturing.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=118031 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty of Manufacturing Engineering Abdullah, Zulkeflee 1. 3D Matter (2015) ‘What is the best flexible filament for my 3D printing needs’, My3Dmatter.Com, pp. 1–21. Available at: http://my3dmatter.com/what-is-the-best-flexible-filament-for-my-3d-printing-needs/. 2. Abbas, T., Othman, F. M. and Ali, H. B. (2017) ‘Effect of infill Parameter on compression property in FDM Process’, 7(10), pp. 16–19. doi: 10.9790/9622-0710021619. 3. Ahn, S. et al. (2002) ‘Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS’, Rapid Prototyping Journal, 8(4), pp. 248–257. doi: 10.1108/13552540210441166. 4. Ali, M. Y. et al. (2016) ‘Studies on Effect of Fused Deposition Modelling Process Parameters on Ultimate Tensile Strength and Dimensional Accuracy of Nylon’, in IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering PAPER. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/149/1/012035. 5. Baich, L. (2016) ‘Impact of Infill Design on Mechanical Strength and Production Cost in Material Extrusion Based Additive Manufacturing’. 6. Banwell, H. A. (2016) ‘Foot orthoses for adults with flexible pes planus’, (February). 7. Bates-Green, K. and Howie, T. (2017) ‘Materials for 3D Printing by Fused Deposition’, pp. 1–21. 8. Bechthold, L. et al. (2015) ‘3D printing: A qualitative assessment of applications, recent trends and the technology’s future potential’, Econstor, (17–2015), pp. 1–84. 9. Bonanno, D. R., Landorf, K. B. and Menz, H. B. (2018) ‘Pressure-relieving properties of various shoe inserts in older people with plantar heel pain’, Gait & Posture. Elsevier, 33(3), pp. 385–389. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2010.12.009. 10. Burhan, M. H. (2015) Design and Fabrication of an orthotic insole by using Kinect XBox Gaming Sensor Scanner and 3D Printer. 11. Burhan, M. H. et al. (2017) ‘Designing an Orthotic Insole by Using Kinect®XBOX Gaming Sensor Scanner and Computer Aided Engineering Software’, IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 226(1). doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/226/1/012026. 12. Chouksey, A. (2012) ‘Study of parametric optimization of fused deposition modelling process using response surface methodology’. 13. Christensen, K. (2000) Custom-Fitted vs. Off-the-Shelf Orthotics, Dynamic Chiropractic. Available at: http://www.dynamicchiropractic.com/mpacms/dc/article.php?id= 31576& no_paginate=true&p_friendly=true&no_b=true (Accessed: 30 March 2018). 14. Ciobanu, O. et al. (2012) ‘Customized foot orthosis manufactured with 3D printers’, Proc. IMS, (September), p. 7. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/260686174_ CUSTOMIZED_FOOT_ORTHOSIS_MANUFACTURED_WITH_3D_PRINTERS%5Cnhttp://web.sakarya.edu.tr/~shizal/images/yayinlar/D4.pdf. 15. Cotoros, D. and Baritz, M. (2012) ‘Implementing Rapid Prototyping Technologies for Corrective Insoles’, International Journal of Modern Manufacturing Technologies, IV(1), pp. 41–46. 16. Dandgaval, O. and Bichkar, P. (2016) ‘Rapid Prototyping Technology -Study Of Fused Deposition Modelling Technique’, International Journal of Mechanical And Production Engineering, 4(44), pp. 2320–2092. 17. Dars, S. et al. (2018) ‘The e ectiveness of non-surgical intervention ( Foot Orthoses ) for paediatric exible pes planus : A systematic review : Update’, pp. 1–11. doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193060. 18. Davia-aracil, M. et al. (2018) ‘Computers in Industry 3D printing of functional anatomical insoles’, Computers in Industry, 95, pp. 38–53. 19. Defects, E. O. F. M., On, O. and Failure, T. H. E. (2016) ‘Effect of manufacturing-induced defects and orientation on the failure and fracture mechanism of 3d printed structures’, (December). 20. Divyathej, M. V, Varun, M. and Rajeev, P. (2016) ‘Analysis of mechanical behavior of 3D printed ABS parts by experiments’, International Journal of Scientific & Engineering Research, 7(3), pp. 116–124. 21. Dr. Mary Lowth (2016) Pes Planus, Patient Platform Limited. Available at: https://patient.info/doctor/pes-planus-flat-feet (Accessed: 20 May 2018). 22. EAMG, E. A. M. G. (2015) ‘Introduction to Additive Manufacturing Technology’. Available at: www.epma.com/am. 23. Fried, C. (2016) Foot Orthoses : Plantar Pressure Analysis for Rapid-Prototyping. University College London. 24. Gibson, I., Rosen, D. and Stucker, B. (2015) Additive Manufacturing Technologies, Additive Manufacturing Technologies: 3D Printing, Rapid Prototyping, and Direct Digital Manufacturing, Second Edition. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2113-3. 25. Gorski, F., Kuczko, W. and Wichniarek, R. (2014) ‘Impact Strength of ABS Parts Manufactured Using Fused Deposition Modelling Technology’, ARCHIVES OF MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY AND AUTOMATIONS OF MECHANICAL TECHNOLOGY AND AUTOMATION, 34(1). 26. Hernandez, R. et al. (2016) ‘Analyzing the Tensile, Compressive, and Flexural Properties of 3D Printed ABS P430 Plastic Based on Printing Orientation Using Fused Deposition Modeling’, Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium, pp. 939–950. 27. Jin, Y. et al. (2015) ‘Additive Manufacturing of Custom Orthoses and Prostheses – A Review’, Procedia CIRP. Elsevier B.V., 36, pp. 199–204. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2015.02.125. 28. Jin, Y., He, Y. and Shih, A. (2016) ‘Process Planning for the Fuse Deposition Modeling of Ankle-Foot-Othoses’, in 18th CIRP Conference on Electro Physical and Chemical Machining (ISEM XVIII) Process. Elsevier B.V. This, pp. 760–765. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2016.02.315. 29. Kahle, J. T. and Bauer, G. S. (2003) ‘Orthotics Overview - Demonstration Project on Prosthetics and Orthotics’, Manual Demonstration, p. 59. Available at: http://nbcobt.org/images/Orthotic_Overview.pdf. 30. Kennedy, S. (2008) ‘Material Choices in Foot Orthotic Design’, The O&P Edge, February, pp. 52–53. Available at: www.ondp.com/edge. 31. Krivoniak, A. and Sirinterlikci, A. (2017) ‘3D printed custom orthotic device development: A student-driven project’, ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings, 2017–June. 32. Lužanin, O., Movrin, D. and Plan, M. (2014) ‘Effect of Layer Thickness , Deposition Angle , and Infill on Maximum Flexural Force in Fdm-Built Specimens’, Journal for Technology of Plasticity, 39(1), pp. 49–58. doi: 10.1007/978-1-137-31426-0_1 M4 - Citavi. 33. Maciunaite, M. (2015) Assembling and maintaining a 3D scanning workstation. Helsinki Metropolia University of Applied Sciences. 34. MASS4D Prescription Orthotics (2017) Why Optimal Plantar Pressure Displaceme...t - MASS4D® Insoles and Foot Orthotics.pdf, MASS4D. Available at: https://www.mass4d.in/blogs/clinicians-blog/the-importance-of-optimal-plantar-pressure-displacement (Accessed: 19 December 2018). 35. Mogan, Y., Irwan, M. H. and Periyasamy, R. (2016) ‘Thermoplastic elastomer infill pattern impact on mechanical properties 3D printed customized orthotic insole’, ARPN Journal of Engineering and Applied Sciences, 11(August), pp. 6519–6524. 36. Moorthy, T. N. and Siti Fatimah Sulaiman (2015) ‘Individualizing characteristics of footprints in Malaysian Malays for person identification from a forensic perspective’, Egyptian Journal of Forensic Sciences journal, pp. 13–22. 37. Onwubolu, G. C. and Rayegani, F. (2014) ‘Characterization and Optimization of Mechanical Properties of ABS Parts Manufactured by the Fused Deposition Modelling Process’, International Journal of Manufacturing Engineering. doi: 10.1155/2014/598531. 38. Ozkan, O. H. (2005) A Research on Footwear and Foot Interaction through Anatomy and Human Engineering. 39. Peixoto, J., Flores, P. and Souto, A. (2017) ‘A new approach to implement a customized anatomic insole in orthopaedic footwear of lower limb orthosis’, in PEIXOTO, J. (ed.) 17th World Textile Conference AUTEX 2017- Textiles - Shaping the Future. IOP Publishing Ltd, pp. 1–6. doi: 10.1088/1757-899X/254/23/232006. 40. Rayegani, F. and Onwubolu, G. C. (2014) ‘Fused deposition modelling (fdm) process parameter prediction and optimization using group method for data handling (gmdh) and differential evolution (de)’, International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology, 73(1–4), pp. 509–519. doi: 10.1007/s00170-014-5835-2. 41. Rigotti, D. et al. (no date) Multifunctional materials for 3D printed customizable footwear. University of Trento. 42. Royal Academy of Engineering (2013) ‘Additive Manufacturing : Opportunities and Constraints’, Royal Academy of Engineering, (May 2013), p. 21. Available at: http://www.raeng.org.uk/publications/reports/additive-manufacturing. 43. Salles, A. S. (2011) The specification and evaluation of personalised footwear for additive manufacturing. Loughborough University. 44. Salles, A. S. and Gyi, D. E. (2012) ‘The specification of personalised insoles using additive manufacturing’, 41, pp. 1771–1774. doi: 10.3233/WOR-2012-0383-1771. 45. Simplify3D (2018) Print Quality Troubleshooting Guide. Available at: https://www.simplify3d.com/support/print-quality-troubleshooting/ (Accessed: 19 December 2018). 46. Sinha, S. et al. (2013) ‘Medial arch orthosis for paediatric flatfoot’, 21(1), pp. 37–43. doi: 10.1177/230949901302100111. 47. Sood, A. K., Ohdar, R. K. and Mahapatra, S. S. (2012) ‘Experimental investigation and empirical modelling of FDM process for compressive strength improvement’, Journal of Advanced Research. doi: 10.1016/j.jare.2011.05.001. 48. Su, S. et al. (2017) ‘The Effect of Arch Height and Material Hardness of Personalized Insole on Correction and Tissues of Flatfoot’, 2017. 49. Surma, R., Sercer, M. and Pilipovic, A. (2015) ‘Designing and Production Of Polymer Product With Fused Deposition Modelling – Case Study’, in 15th International Scientific Conference on Production Engineering –CIM2015. ResearchGate, pp. 221–226. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/280717392%0ADESIGNING. 50. Surmen, K., Ortes, F. and Arslan, Y. Z. (2016) ‘Design and Production of Subject Specific Insole Using Reverse Engineering and 3D Printing Technology’, International Journal of Engineering Science Invention, 5(12), pp. 11–15. 51. Takata, Y. et al. (2013) ‘Standing Balance on the Ground —The Influence of Flatfeet and Insoles’, Journal of Physical Therapy Science, 25(12), pp. 1519–1521. doi: 10.1589/jpts.25.1519. 52. Telfer, S. et al. (2012) ‘Embracing additive manufacture : implications for foot and ankle orthosis design’, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders 2012, pp. 1471–2474. 53. Totah, D. et al. (2017) ‘Manufacturing Choices for Ankle-Foot Orthoses : A Multi-objective Optimization’, Procedia CIRP. The Author(s), 65, pp. 145–150. doi: 10.1016/j.procir.2017.04.014. 54. Tsung, B. Y. S. et al. (2004) ‘Effectiveness of insoles on plantar pressure redistribution’, The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, 41(6), p. 767. doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2003.09.0139. 55. Wu, W. et al. (2017) ‘Influence of layer thickness, raster angle, deformation temperature and recovery temperature on the shape-memory effect of 3D-printed polylactic acid samples’, Materials, 10(8). doi: 10.3390/ma10080970. 56. Yap, A., Ling, Y. and Yee, W. (2014) ‘Title Lifestyle Product Via 3D Printing: Wearable Fashion’, pp. 393–398. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/10220/41857. 57. Yuk, B. et al. (2014) ‘Effectiveness of insoles on plantar pressure redistribution’, The Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development, (March). doi: 10.1682/JRRD.2003.09.0139. 58. Zhai, Y., Galarraga, H. and Lados, D. A. (2015) ‘Microstructure Evolution, Tensile Properties, and Fatigue Damage Mechanisms in Ti-6Al-4V Alloys Fabricated by Two Additive Manufacturing Techniques’, in Procedia Engineering. doi: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.08.007.

Development And Evaluation Of Customized Pes Planus Orthotic Insole Using Additive Manufacturing

Similar Items