Technological Risk Assessment Process For Technological Risks Petrol And Diesel Supply Chain Activities

The downstream supply chain activities of petroleum are conducting value added activities on crude oil. Each of the activities are in place to perform different function and involved different facility. In such high technological supply chain, risk assessment process is in place from top down to ass...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Choong, Chien Khay
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English English
Published:	2020
Subjects:	H Social Sciences (General)
Online Access:	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25438/1/Technological%20Risk%20Assessment%20Process%20For%20Technological%20Risks%20Petrol%20And%20Diesel%20Supply%20Chain%20Activities.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25438/2/Technological%20Risk%20Assessment%20Process%20For%20Technological%20Risks%20Petrol%20And%20Diesel%20Supply%20Chain%20Activities.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-utem-ep.25438
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
collection	UTeM Repository
language	English English
advisor	Abdul Hamid, Mohd Syafu Rizal
topic	H Social Sciences (General) H Social Sciences (General)
spellingShingle	H Social Sciences (General) H Social Sciences (General) Choong, Chien Khay Technological Risk Assessment Process For Technological Risks Petrol And Diesel Supply Chain Activities
description	The downstream supply chain activities of petroleum are conducting value added activities on crude oil. Each of the activities are in place to perform different function and involved different facility. In such high technological supply chain, risk assessment process is in place from top down to assess technological risks that embedded in each activity to minimize technological disaster incident, asset damage and losses of human life occur. The study of technological risk assessment process in supply chain is considerable as new and under-study kind of research. This is because, the existing risk assessment process are only in place to provide high level of guideline. The process to assess technological risks on each supply chain activities are still unknown. Therefore, it is time to establish a technological risk assessment process framework that provide technological risk assessment process and assess technological risks factors along crude oil supply chain activities. The research was based on interpretivism paradigms under an exploratory study. This research is focused on identifying the factors of technological risks that embedded on each activity and technological risk assessment process that can adopted by each similar high technological risk supply chain activity. By knowing the factor of technological risk and risk assessment process, root cause of technological risk can be identified and assessed. Therefore, this research gives a new vision on risk assessment process that can be used to assess technological risks. Single case study and in-depth literature review were employed as the research design approach. Two key data collection methods (qualitative methods) were used: Primary data from face-to-face interview with PETRONAS. Secondary data from official documents. Also, one methods of analysis were used, namely: Explanation building. The literature review on supply chain, supply chain risks, technological risks and risk assessment identifies the need of understanding the results of technological risk assessment process on supply chain activity, technological risk categorize and the risk assessment process. Review on the previous study allows the researcher to establish the theoretical framework. The case study analysis led to the identification on the real practices of high technological risk industry that embedded technological risk across the supply chain activity. Thus, the researcher gained the information on technological risk assessment process and also the technological risk factors that embedded on each activity. As a result, this study identified four technological risk factors on each supply chain activities and technological risk assessment process for each activity from case study. In turn, this research further underlines and suggested the framework of technological risk assessment process to assess technological risks across supply chain activities.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Master of Philosophy (M.Phil.)
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Choong, Chien Khay
author_facet	Choong, Chien Khay
author_sort	Choong, Chien Khay
title	Technological Risk Assessment Process For Technological Risks Petrol And Diesel Supply Chain Activities
title_short	Technological Risk Assessment Process For Technological Risks Petrol And Diesel Supply Chain Activities
title_full	Technological Risk Assessment Process For Technological Risks Petrol And Diesel Supply Chain Activities
title_fullStr	Technological Risk Assessment Process For Technological Risks Petrol And Diesel Supply Chain Activities
title_full_unstemmed	Technological Risk Assessment Process For Technological Risks Petrol And Diesel Supply Chain Activities
title_sort	technological risk assessment process for technological risks petrol and diesel supply chain activities
granting_institution	Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka
granting_department	Faculty of Technology Management and Technopreneurship
publishDate	2020
url	http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25438/1/Technological%20Risk%20Assessment%20Process%20For%20Technological%20Risks%20Petrol%20And%20Diesel%20Supply%20Chain%20Activities.pdf http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25438/2/Technological%20Risk%20Assessment%20Process%20For%20Technological%20Risks%20Petrol%20And%20Diesel%20Supply%20Chain%20Activities.pdf
_version_	1747834128174153728
spelling	my-utem-ep.254382021-12-10T16:18:17Z Technological Risk Assessment Process For Technological Risks Petrol And Diesel Supply Chain Activities 2020 Choong, Chien Khay H Social Sciences (General) HD Industries. Land use. Labor The downstream supply chain activities of petroleum are conducting value added activities on crude oil. Each of the activities are in place to perform different function and involved different facility. In such high technological supply chain, risk assessment process is in place from top down to assess technological risks that embedded in each activity to minimize technological disaster incident, asset damage and losses of human life occur. The study of technological risk assessment process in supply chain is considerable as new and under-study kind of research. This is because, the existing risk assessment process are only in place to provide high level of guideline. The process to assess technological risks on each supply chain activities are still unknown. Therefore, it is time to establish a technological risk assessment process framework that provide technological risk assessment process and assess technological risks factors along crude oil supply chain activities. The research was based on interpretivism paradigms under an exploratory study. This research is focused on identifying the factors of technological risks that embedded on each activity and technological risk assessment process that can adopted by each similar high technological risk supply chain activity. By knowing the factor of technological risk and risk assessment process, root cause of technological risk can be identified and assessed. Therefore, this research gives a new vision on risk assessment process that can be used to assess technological risks. Single case study and in-depth literature review were employed as the research design approach. Two key data collection methods (qualitative methods) were used: Primary data from face-to-face interview with PETRONAS. Secondary data from official documents. Also, one methods of analysis were used, namely: Explanation building. The literature review on supply chain, supply chain risks, technological risks and risk assessment identifies the need of understanding the results of technological risk assessment process on supply chain activity, technological risk categorize and the risk assessment process. Review on the previous study allows the researcher to establish the theoretical framework. The case study analysis led to the identification on the real practices of high technological risk industry that embedded technological risk across the supply chain activity. Thus, the researcher gained the information on technological risk assessment process and also the technological risk factors that embedded on each activity. As a result, this study identified four technological risk factors on each supply chain activities and technological risk assessment process for each activity from case study. In turn, this research further underlines and suggested the framework of technological risk assessment process to assess technological risks across supply chain activities. 2020 Thesis http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25438/ http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25438/1/Technological%20Risk%20Assessment%20Process%20For%20Technological%20Risks%20Petrol%20And%20Diesel%20Supply%20Chain%20Activities.pdf text en public http://eprints.utem.edu.my/id/eprint/25438/2/Technological%20Risk%20Assessment%20Process%20For%20Technological%20Risks%20Petrol%20And%20Diesel%20Supply%20Chain%20Activities.pdf text en validuser https://plh.utem.edu.my/cgi-bin/koha/opac-detail.pl?biblionumber=119830 mphil masters Universiti Teknikal Malaysia Melaka Faculty of Technology Management and Technopreneurship Abdul Hamid, Mohd Syafu Rizal 1. AS/NZS 4360., 2004. Australian/New Zealand Standard Risk Management. Austrialia/NewZealand. 2. Anderson, S., and Felici, M., 2012. Emerging Technological Risk: Underpinning the Risk of Technology Innovation. Springer. 3. Babbie, E., 2014. The Basics of Social Research. Sixth Edition, Cengage Learning. 4. Business Standard, 2013. Shell Shuts Down Malaysia Plant After Exposlosion. [online] Available at: https://www.business-standard.com/article/specials/shell-shuts-downmalaysia - plant-after-explosion-197122701073_1.html [Accessed on 25 November 2017]. 5. Bogataj, D., and Bogataj, M., 2007. Measuring The Supply Chain Risk And Vulnerability in Frequency Space. International Journal of Production Economics, 108(1–2), pp. 291–301. 6. Borghesi, A., and Gaudenzi, B., 2013. Risk Management How to Assess, Transfer and Communicate Critical Risks. Verlag Mailand: Springer. 7. Bryman, A., and Bell, E., 2017. Business Research Methods. SJ Learning. 8. Bruce, K., L., and Bruce, H., 2016. Risk assessment: A practical Guide to Assessing Operational Risks. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons. 9. Cavinato, J. L., 2004. Supply Chain Logistics Risks: From the Back Room to the Board Room. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(5), pp. 383-387. 10. Christopher, M., 2011. Logistics and supply Chain Management. Fourth Edition, Great Britain: Pearson Education. 11. Christopher, M., and Peck, H., 2004. Building the Resilient Supply Chain. The international Journal of Logistic Management, 15(2), pp. 1–14. 12. Cooper, D. R., and Schindler, P. S., 2014. Business Research Methods. Twelfth Edition, McGraw-Hill Irwin. 13. Creswell, J., 2014. Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Fourth Edition, SAGE Publications. 14. Curkovic, S., Thomas, S., and Wagner, B., 2016. Managing Supply Chain Risk. Taylor and Francis Group. 15. David, S. J. J., Pujado, A. T., and Peter, R. P., 2008. Handbook of Petroleum Processing. Second Edition, Netherlands: Springer. 16. Ghauri, P., and Gronhaug, K., 2010. Research Methods in Business Studies. Fourth edition, Pearson Education Limited. 17. Groysman, A., 2017. Corrosion Problems and Solutions in Old Refining and Petrochemical Industry. Corrosion Engineering, Science and Technology, 53(1), pp. 80-81. 18. Gupta, R. K., and Awasthy, R., 2015. Qualitative Research in Management: Methods and Experiences. SAGE Publications. 19. Hancock, D. R., and Algozzine, B., 2006. Doing Case Study Research. New York: Teachers College Press. 20. Hays, D. G., and Singh, A. A., 2012. Qualitative Inquiry in Clinical and Educational Settings. New York: The Guilford Press. 21. Ho, W., Zheng, T., Yildiz, H., and Talluri, S., 2015. Supply Chain Risk Management : A Literature Review. International Journal of Production Research, 53(16), pp. 5013-5069. 22. Hopp, W. J., Iravani, S. M. R., and Liu, Z., 2012. Supply Chain Disruptions: Theory and Practice of Management Risk. H. Gurnani, A. Mehrotra, and R. Saibal Editors. 23. James, G. S., 2010. The Refinery of the Future. Oxford: Elsevier. 24. Jacobsson, P., Grimvall, G., Holmgren, A., and Thedeen, T., 2010. Risk in Technological Systems. Springer Series. 25. Jacoby, D., 2012. Optimal Supply Chain Management in Oil, Gas, Power Generation. Oklahoma: PennWell Corporation. 26. Jesson, J., Matheson, L., and Lacey, F. M., 2011. Doing Your Literature Review :Traditional and Sistematic Techniques. Evaluation and Research in Education, 24(3), pp. 219-221. 27. Keegan, S. M., and Sheila, K., 2009. Qualitative Research - Good Decision Making Through Understanding People, Cultures and Markets. International Journal of Market Reserach, pp. 260-270. 28. Kevin, B., Hendricks. V., and Vinod, R. S., 2012. Supply Chain Disruptions:Theory and Practice of Managing Risk. London: Springer. 29. Kildow, B., 2011. A Supply Chain Management Guide To Business Continuity. New York: Betty A. Kildow. 30. Kumar, R., 2011. Research Methodology: A Step by Step Guide for Beginners. London: Springer. 31. Leavy, P., 2014. The Oxford Handbook of Qualitative Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 32. Li, J., Jia, C., and Shouyang, W., 2011. Risk Management of Supply and Cash Flows in Supply Chain. International series in Operations Research and Management Science, pp. 19-215. 33. Malaysia Energy Information Hub (MEIH), 2014. Crude oil Product-Consumption. [online] Available at: https://meih.st.gov.my/statistics?p_auth=TrF2Cfn2&p_p_id= Eng_Statistic_ WAR_STOASPublicPortlet&p_p_lifecycle=1&p_p_ [Accessed on 19 September 2019]. 34. Manuj, I., and Mentzer, J. T., 2008. Global supply Chain Risk Management Strategies. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 38(3), pp. 192-223. 35. Merriam, S. B., and Tisdell, E. J., 2016. Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation. Fourth Edition., San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. 36. MS ISO, 2010. Risk Management:Principles and Guidelines. Selangor, Department of Standards Malaysia. 37. Moraru, R. I., 2012. Risk Management for the Future: Theory and Cases. J. Emblemsvag Edition, Croatia: InTech. 38. Ostrom, L.T., and Wilhelmsen, C. A., 2012. Risk Assessment: Tools, Techniques, and Their Applications. First Edition, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons. 39. Popov, G., Lyon, B. K., and Hollcroft, B., 2016. Risk Assessment: A Practical Guide to Assessing Operational Risks. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons. 40. Prior, L., 2008. The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. [online] Available at: http://www.uk.sagepub.com/booksProdDesc.nav?prodId=Book229805 [Accessed on 07 July 2019]. 41. Rausand, M., 2011. Risk Assessment: Theory,Methods, and Applications. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons. 42. Robert and Brelsford., 2016. Fire Halts Operation at Malaysia Refinery. OGJ Downstream Technology Editor. 43. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., and Thornhill, A., 2016. Research Methods For Business Students. Seventh Edition, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons. 44. Scott, C., Lundgren, H., and Thompson, P., 2011. Guide to Supply Chain Management. New York: Springer. 45. Sime, C., Thomas, S., and Bret, W., 2016. Managing Supply Chain Risk: Integrating with Risk Management. London: Springer. 46. Sodhi, M. S., and Lee, S., 2007. An Analysis of Sources of risk in the Consumer Electronics Industry. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(11), pp. 1430–1439. 47. Sodhi, M. S., and Tang, C. S., 2012. Managing Supply Chain Risk. London: Springer. 48. Spekman, R. E., and Davis, E. W., 2004. Risky Business: Expanding the Discussion on Risk and the Extended Enterprise. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 34(5), pp. 414–433. 49. Stadtler, H., Kilger, C., and Meyr, H., 2015. Supply Chain Management and Advanced Planning : Concepts, Models, Software and Case Studies. Fifth Edition, Springer. 50. Tang, C., and Tomlin, B., 2008. The Power of Flexibility for Mitigating Supply Chain Risks. International Journal of Production Economics, 116(1), pp. 12-27. 51. Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., and DeVault, M. L., 2016. Introduction to Qualitative Research Methods: A Guidebook and Resource. Fourth Edition, John Wiley and Sons. 52. Teresa, W., and Jennifer, B., 2009. Managing Supply Chain Risk and Vulnerability. Springer. 53. Wise Global Training, 2015. Introduction to Oil and Gas Operational Safety. New York: Routledge. 54. Wisner, J. D., Tan, K. C., and Leong, G. K., 2015. Principles of Supply Chain Management: A Balanced Approach. Third Edition, Cengage Learning. 55. Yin, R., 2016. Qualitative Research From Start to Finish. Second Edition, London: The Guilford Press. 56. Yin, R. K., 2014. Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Fifth Edition, SAGE Publications. 57. Yin, R. K., 2011. Qualitative Research From Start To Finish. New York: The Guilford Press. 58. Zakery, A., 2011. Logistics Operations and Management. London: Elsevier.

Technological Risk Assessment Process For Technological Risks Petrol And Diesel Supply Chain Activities

Similar Items