Enforcement and challenging of arbitration award

The objective of arbitration is to produce an award that is just, final and enforceable. If an arbitrator has observed the requirement of conclusiveness and completeness, he should have provided the parties with a resolution that either of them could use, defensively to fend off further claims again...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Zaharullil, Haniz Zuraiha
Format:	Thesis
Language:	English
Published:	2009
Subjects:	HD28 Management Industrial Management Q Science (General)
Online Access:	http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/12327/1/HanizZuraihaZaharullilMFAB2009.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-utm-ep.12327
record_format	uketd_dc
spelling	my-utm-ep.123272018-06-25T03:20:20Z Enforcement and challenging of arbitration award 2009-04 Zaharullil, Haniz Zuraiha HD28 Management. Industrial Management Q Science (General) The objective of arbitration is to produce an award that is just, final and enforceable. If an arbitrator has observed the requirement of conclusiveness and completeness, he should have provided the parties with a resolution that either of them could use, defensively to fend off further claims against or positively for enforcement of, his rights acquired under the award. An award, when given, would not be final, but is capable of being challenged or not to be enforced in court. Therefore, this study intends to identify what grounds and situation, which are available to the parties especially the losing or unsatisfied parties to defend their stand in arbitral awards. The stud concentrates on theory from texts , books, articles and past dissertation and also have been carried out mainly through documentary analysis of law journals, such as Malayan Law Journal, The Arbitration Act 2005, etc; as well as court cases from Lexis Nexis and Ipsofactoj.com website. Literature review has shown that, there are at least nine (9) basic grounds for refusing recognition or enforcement arbitral awards. However, the evidence from the profile of court cases shows that, the situation is rather limited which can be linked exactly to the ground where the arbitral award can be enforce as well as not to be enforced. Since the court cases cannot merely be linked to the grounds in such a way to enforce or not to enforce the arbitral award, it is hoped that this dissertation would act as a guidelines to parties pursuing civil action in enforcing the arbitration award if they resort to it. 2009-04 Thesis http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/12327/ http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/12327/1/HanizZuraihaZaharullilMFAB2009.pdf application/pdf en public masters Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Science Faculty of Science
institution	Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
collection	UTM Institutional Repository
language	English
topic	HD28 Management Industrial Management Q Science (General)
spellingShingle	HD28 Management Industrial Management Q Science (General) Zaharullil, Haniz Zuraiha Enforcement and challenging of arbitration award
description	The objective of arbitration is to produce an award that is just, final and enforceable. If an arbitrator has observed the requirement of conclusiveness and completeness, he should have provided the parties with a resolution that either of them could use, defensively to fend off further claims against or positively for enforcement of, his rights acquired under the award. An award, when given, would not be final, but is capable of being challenged or not to be enforced in court. Therefore, this study intends to identify what grounds and situation, which are available to the parties especially the losing or unsatisfied parties to defend their stand in arbitral awards. The stud concentrates on theory from texts , books, articles and past dissertation and also have been carried out mainly through documentary analysis of law journals, such as Malayan Law Journal, The Arbitration Act 2005, etc; as well as court cases from Lexis Nexis and Ipsofactoj.com website. Literature review has shown that, there are at least nine (9) basic grounds for refusing recognition or enforcement arbitral awards. However, the evidence from the profile of court cases shows that, the situation is rather limited which can be linked exactly to the ground where the arbitral award can be enforce as well as not to be enforced. Since the court cases cannot merely be linked to the grounds in such a way to enforce or not to enforce the arbitral award, it is hoped that this dissertation would act as a guidelines to parties pursuing civil action in enforcing the arbitration award if they resort to it.
format	Thesis
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Zaharullil, Haniz Zuraiha
author_facet	Zaharullil, Haniz Zuraiha
author_sort	Zaharullil, Haniz Zuraiha
title	Enforcement and challenging of arbitration award
title_short	Enforcement and challenging of arbitration award
title_full	Enforcement and challenging of arbitration award
title_fullStr	Enforcement and challenging of arbitration award
title_full_unstemmed	Enforcement and challenging of arbitration award
title_sort	enforcement and challenging of arbitration award
granting_institution	Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Science
granting_department	Faculty of Science
publishDate	2009
url	http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/12327/1/HanizZuraihaZaharullilMFAB2009.pdf
_version_	1747814924351963136

Enforcement and challenging of arbitration award

Similar Items