The knowledge, practices and challenges of developers in housing delivery systems in Malaysia

There are various types of housing delivery system in Malaysia which are Sell Then Buils (STB), Build Then Sell (BTS), 10:90 System (10:90) and 5/95 Home Loan Package (5/95). It is reported that most of the developers are practising the conventional system which is STB. In this context, it is import...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Shu, Te Ying
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/32614/1/ShuTeYingMFKSG2012.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utm-ep.32614
record_format uketd_dc
spelling my-utm-ep.326142018-04-27T01:23:23Z The knowledge, practices and challenges of developers in housing delivery systems in Malaysia 2012-08 Shu, Te Ying HD Industries. Land use. Labor There are various types of housing delivery system in Malaysia which are Sell Then Buils (STB), Build Then Sell (BTS), 10:90 System (10:90) and 5/95 Home Loan Package (5/95). It is reported that most of the developers are practising the conventional system which is STB. In this context, it is important to justify developers’ circumstance and the rationales of their preferred and practised housing delivery system. The objectives for this study are threefold. First, to determine the knowledge of developers about the different types of housing delivery system in Malaysia. Second, to identify the common types of housing delivery system currently practised by developers and third, to determine the challenges faced by developers in the implementation of different types of the system. The data and information needed in this study were obtained from the questionnaire returned by 20 developers out of 32 in the scope of study, Johor Bahru. Contingency Table Analysis was used to obtain the findings for the first and second objectives; whereas the third objective was studied via the average mean score and ranking method. The findings revealed that most of the developers only knew and practised STB but lacking in the knowledge and information for another three types of housing delivery system. Although they are practising STB, not all of them have good understanding about it, especially regarding the party to bear the risk of abandoned housing project. It was also found that the burden of financial sources and inherent risk of project are among the main challenges faced by developers to not implement BTS, 10:90 and 5/95. This study would serve as supplement information for developers, government agencies, and house buyers to gain better insight on the reasons for developers’ reluctance to adopt the proposed housing delivery systems. With that, the existing housing delivery system can be improved further. 2012-08 Thesis http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/32614/ http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/32614/1/ShuTeYingMFKSG2012.pdf application/pdf en public masters Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Geoinformation and Real Estate Faculty of Geoinformation and Real Estate
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
collection UTM Institutional Repository
language English
topic HD Industries
Land use
Labor
spellingShingle HD Industries
Land use
Labor
Shu, Te Ying
The knowledge, practices and challenges of developers in housing delivery systems in Malaysia
description There are various types of housing delivery system in Malaysia which are Sell Then Buils (STB), Build Then Sell (BTS), 10:90 System (10:90) and 5/95 Home Loan Package (5/95). It is reported that most of the developers are practising the conventional system which is STB. In this context, it is important to justify developers’ circumstance and the rationales of their preferred and practised housing delivery system. The objectives for this study are threefold. First, to determine the knowledge of developers about the different types of housing delivery system in Malaysia. Second, to identify the common types of housing delivery system currently practised by developers and third, to determine the challenges faced by developers in the implementation of different types of the system. The data and information needed in this study were obtained from the questionnaire returned by 20 developers out of 32 in the scope of study, Johor Bahru. Contingency Table Analysis was used to obtain the findings for the first and second objectives; whereas the third objective was studied via the average mean score and ranking method. The findings revealed that most of the developers only knew and practised STB but lacking in the knowledge and information for another three types of housing delivery system. Although they are practising STB, not all of them have good understanding about it, especially regarding the party to bear the risk of abandoned housing project. It was also found that the burden of financial sources and inherent risk of project are among the main challenges faced by developers to not implement BTS, 10:90 and 5/95. This study would serve as supplement information for developers, government agencies, and house buyers to gain better insight on the reasons for developers’ reluctance to adopt the proposed housing delivery systems. With that, the existing housing delivery system can be improved further.
format Thesis
qualification_level Master's degree
author Shu, Te Ying
author_facet Shu, Te Ying
author_sort Shu, Te Ying
title The knowledge, practices and challenges of developers in housing delivery systems in Malaysia
title_short The knowledge, practices and challenges of developers in housing delivery systems in Malaysia
title_full The knowledge, practices and challenges of developers in housing delivery systems in Malaysia
title_fullStr The knowledge, practices and challenges of developers in housing delivery systems in Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed The knowledge, practices and challenges of developers in housing delivery systems in Malaysia
title_sort knowledge, practices and challenges of developers in housing delivery systems in malaysia
granting_institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Geoinformation and Real Estate
granting_department Faculty of Geoinformation and Real Estate
publishDate 2012
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/32614/1/ShuTeYingMFKSG2012.pdf
_version_ 1747816045164363776