Kepimpinan pengajaran guru besar di daerah Johor Bahru
on This study attempted to recognize the level of teachers’ knowledge about the responsbility of headmasters as instructional leadership, to identify if there is a difference in the level of teachers’ knowledge about the responsbility of headmasters as intructional leadership through demographi...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
2013
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/42148/1/NorAslahArisMFP2013.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| Summary: | on
This study attempted to recognize the level of teachers’ knowledge about the responsbility of headmasters as instructional leadership, to identify if there is a difference in the level of teachers’ knowledge about the responsbility of headmasters as intructional leadership through demographic factor; gender, race and type of school and to identify the relationship between teacher’s knowledge among headmasters level practice as a instructional leadership. The instruments that were used to collect data for this study; the Principal Instruction Management Rating Scale (PIMRS). A total of 106 teachers were selected for this study. All of them returned the completed questionnaires which were found to be usable and duly proceed for statistical analysis through the use of Statistical Package for Social Science (SPSS), software version 16.0. The teachers perceived that their headmisters demonstrated a high sense as well as giving strong emphasis on instructional leadership in the discharge of their principalship function. However, there is a significant difference in their level of self-efficacy. Result showed that they differed significantly in their perception of the headmasters on this issue where the instructional leadership among the demographic factors; gender, races and school type are higher. Both the variables, level of knowledgement instructional leadership and level of practice instructional leadership, showed high positive relationships. However, when correlated against each other, level of knowledgement and level of practise instructional leadership, i.e. r = 0.667 |
|---|