Interpretation dilemma: payment response in CIPAA 2012
By virtue of section 6(4) of the CIPAA 2012, the entire amount is deemed disputed if the non-paying party chooses not to respond to the payment claim. Hence, the non-paying party will not be precluded from challenging the payment claim in the adjudication proceeding even if he has failed to serve a...
Saved in:
Main Author: | Mohd. Bashah, Imee Nurshafinaz |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | English |
Published: |
2016
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/77668/1/ImeeNurshafinazMohdMFAB2016.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
Similar Items
-
The effectiveness of the implementation of CIPAA 2012 in alleviating the payment ills of Malaysia construction industry
by: Cheah, Siok Teng
Published: (2019) -
Profile of cases relating to CIPAA 2012 reffered to court
by: Peh, Ruoh Fu
Published: (2019) -
Rights of contractors on recovery of payment after termination of contract under CIPAA 2012
by: Ismail, Mohamad Zahierruden
Published: (2017) -
Payment issues of architect's professional fees
by: Mohd. Ripin, Mohd. Yusri
Published: (2008) -
Profile of construction payment dispute
by: Ooi, Poh Poh
Published: (2010)