Bioethanol production from batch and continuous phytoremediation systems

The effectiveness of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in remediating municipal wastewater and producing bioethanol in batch and continuous systems was compared with water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes) and water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica). Batch experiment was conducted using stagnant wastewater s...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mat Hassan, Mohd. Arif Hakimi
Format: Thesis
Language:English
Published: 2016
Subjects:
Online Access:http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/78762/1/MohdArifHakimiMFKA2016.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-utm-ep.78762
record_format uketd_dc
spelling my-utm-ep.787622018-09-17T04:08:31Z Bioethanol production from batch and continuous phytoremediation systems 2016-08 Mat Hassan, Mohd. Arif Hakimi TA Engineering (General). Civil engineering (General) The effectiveness of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in remediating municipal wastewater and producing bioethanol in batch and continuous systems was compared with water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes) and water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica). Batch experiment was conducted using stagnant wastewater system and compared with continuous experiment in order to determine the best treatment system for nutrients and pollutants removal while producing high amount of biomass for bioethanol production. The batch experiment was conducted for 7 days while continuous experiment was conducted for 18 days for each of the aquatic plant. The results for the comparison between rhizofiltration plants have shown that water lettuce has better removal performance compared with water hyacinth and water spinach. The continuous system showed better performance in treatment rate and biomass production compared to batch system. The biomass harvested from water hyacinth, water lettuce and water spinach were 772±37 g/kg, 794±75 g/kg and 702±69 g/kg, respectively. Dinitrosalicyclic test was conducted to measure the reduction of sugar from plant biomass. The concentration of sugar produced by water hyacinth was 21.2±2.7 g/L, while water lettuce was 23.5±3.8 g/L, which was slightly higher than water hyacinth’s sugar production. Water spinach produced the lowest sugar concentration with only 15.5±3.3 g/L. The production of bioethanol estimated from water lettuce was 0.13±0.01 g/g bioethanol. Meanwhile, water hyacinth produced 0.12±0.01 g/g of bioethanol, a value lower than water lettuce. Due to the low concentration of sugar, water spinach managed to produce only 0.10±0.02 g/g bioethanol. In conclusion, water lettuce shows better performance compared with water hyacinth in remediating wastewater and producing biofuel. 2016-08 Thesis http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/78762/ http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/78762/1/MohdArifHakimiMFKA2016.pdf application/pdf en public http://dms.library.utm.my:8080/vital/access/manager/Repository/vital:106349 masters Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Civil Engineering Faculty of Civil Engineering
institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
collection UTM Institutional Repository
language English
topic TA Engineering (General)
Civil engineering (General)
spellingShingle TA Engineering (General)
Civil engineering (General)
Mat Hassan, Mohd. Arif Hakimi
Bioethanol production from batch and continuous phytoremediation systems
description The effectiveness of water hyacinth (Eichhornia crassipes) in remediating municipal wastewater and producing bioethanol in batch and continuous systems was compared with water lettuce (Pistia stratiotes) and water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica). Batch experiment was conducted using stagnant wastewater system and compared with continuous experiment in order to determine the best treatment system for nutrients and pollutants removal while producing high amount of biomass for bioethanol production. The batch experiment was conducted for 7 days while continuous experiment was conducted for 18 days for each of the aquatic plant. The results for the comparison between rhizofiltration plants have shown that water lettuce has better removal performance compared with water hyacinth and water spinach. The continuous system showed better performance in treatment rate and biomass production compared to batch system. The biomass harvested from water hyacinth, water lettuce and water spinach were 772±37 g/kg, 794±75 g/kg and 702±69 g/kg, respectively. Dinitrosalicyclic test was conducted to measure the reduction of sugar from plant biomass. The concentration of sugar produced by water hyacinth was 21.2±2.7 g/L, while water lettuce was 23.5±3.8 g/L, which was slightly higher than water hyacinth’s sugar production. Water spinach produced the lowest sugar concentration with only 15.5±3.3 g/L. The production of bioethanol estimated from water lettuce was 0.13±0.01 g/g bioethanol. Meanwhile, water hyacinth produced 0.12±0.01 g/g of bioethanol, a value lower than water lettuce. Due to the low concentration of sugar, water spinach managed to produce only 0.10±0.02 g/g bioethanol. In conclusion, water lettuce shows better performance compared with water hyacinth in remediating wastewater and producing biofuel.
format Thesis
qualification_level Master's degree
author Mat Hassan, Mohd. Arif Hakimi
author_facet Mat Hassan, Mohd. Arif Hakimi
author_sort Mat Hassan, Mohd. Arif Hakimi
title Bioethanol production from batch and continuous phytoremediation systems
title_short Bioethanol production from batch and continuous phytoremediation systems
title_full Bioethanol production from batch and continuous phytoremediation systems
title_fullStr Bioethanol production from batch and continuous phytoremediation systems
title_full_unstemmed Bioethanol production from batch and continuous phytoremediation systems
title_sort bioethanol production from batch and continuous phytoremediation systems
granting_institution Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Faculty of Civil Engineering
granting_department Faculty of Civil Engineering
publishDate 2016
url http://eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/78762/1/MohdArifHakimiMFKA2016.pdf
_version_ 1747818065083498496