Gaya Kepimpinan Ketua Pejabat dan Hubungannya dengan Motivasi Staf Bawahan : Kajian di Jabatan Penilaian dan Perkhidmatan Harta Negeri Terengganu, Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia

Gaya Kepimpinan Ketua Pejabat dan Hubungannya dengan Motivasi Staf Bawahan : Kajian di Jabatan Penilaian dan Perkhidmatan Harta Negeri Terengganu, Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia

The purpose of this study is to find out the relationship between leadership styles of the director and motivation level of the subordinate in Valuation Department, Terengganu. The dimensions of leader style studied are controlling, supportive, participative and success orientation. The study cov...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohd. Rofi, Yusof
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2004
Subjects:
HD28-70 Management
Industrial Management
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/1342/1/MOHD._ROFI_B._YUSOF.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/1342/2/1.MOHD._ROFI_B._YUSOF.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.1342
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
topic HD28-70 Management
Industrial Management
spellingShingle HD28-70 Management
Industrial Management
Mohd. Rofi, Yusof
Gaya Kepimpinan Ketua Pejabat dan Hubungannya dengan Motivasi Staf Bawahan : Kajian di Jabatan Penilaian dan Perkhidmatan Harta Negeri Terengganu, Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia
description The purpose of this study is to find out the relationship between leadership styles of the director and motivation level of the subordinate in Valuation Department, Terengganu. The dimensions of leader style studied are controlling, supportive, participative and success orientation. The study covered the difference motivation level of subordinate based on the leadership style of their director. The study was also to find out if there were any differences in motivation level based on the demographic characteristics of subordinates i.e gender, categories of age, level of education and experience. The leader Behavior Description Questionnaire was used as an instrument to measure the leadership style of the director while A Questionnaire Measure the level of motivation of the subordinate. A total of 41 subordinates were chosen by using simple random sampling. The findings of this study shows that there is a significant relationship between leadership styles of a director and the motivation levels of subordinates. The result also shows that success orientation of leadership styles has a significant positive relationship with the level of motivation of subordinates. This study shows that there are a significant differences in the motivation level of subordinates based on the leadership styles oof a director. The findings also show that there are no significant differences betwen levels of motivation of subordinates based on their demographic characteristics.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Mohd. Rofi, Yusof
author_facet Mohd. Rofi, Yusof
author_sort Mohd. Rofi, Yusof
title Gaya Kepimpinan Ketua Pejabat dan Hubungannya dengan Motivasi Staf Bawahan : Kajian di Jabatan Penilaian dan Perkhidmatan Harta Negeri Terengganu, Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia
title_short Gaya Kepimpinan Ketua Pejabat dan Hubungannya dengan Motivasi Staf Bawahan : Kajian di Jabatan Penilaian dan Perkhidmatan Harta Negeri Terengganu, Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia
title_full Gaya Kepimpinan Ketua Pejabat dan Hubungannya dengan Motivasi Staf Bawahan : Kajian di Jabatan Penilaian dan Perkhidmatan Harta Negeri Terengganu, Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia
title_fullStr Gaya Kepimpinan Ketua Pejabat dan Hubungannya dengan Motivasi Staf Bawahan : Kajian di Jabatan Penilaian dan Perkhidmatan Harta Negeri Terengganu, Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Gaya Kepimpinan Ketua Pejabat dan Hubungannya dengan Motivasi Staf Bawahan : Kajian di Jabatan Penilaian dan Perkhidmatan Harta Negeri Terengganu, Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia
title_sort gaya kepimpinan ketua pejabat dan hubungannya dengan motivasi staf bawahan : kajian di jabatan penilaian dan perkhidmatan harta negeri terengganu, kementerian kewangan malaysia
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Sekolah Siswazah
publishDate 2004
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/1342/1/MOHD._ROFI_B._YUSOF.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/1342/2/1.MOHD._ROFI_B._YUSOF.pdf
_version_ 1747827125450178560
spelling my-uum-etd.13422013-07-24T12:11:32Z Gaya Kepimpinan Ketua Pejabat dan Hubungannya dengan Motivasi Staf Bawahan : Kajian di Jabatan Penilaian dan Perkhidmatan Harta Negeri Terengganu, Kementerian Kewangan Malaysia 2004 Mohd. Rofi, Yusof Sekolah Siswazah Graduate School HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management The purpose of this study is to find out the relationship between leadership styles of the director and motivation level of the subordinate in Valuation Department, Terengganu. The dimensions of leader style studied are controlling, supportive, participative and success orientation. The study covered the difference motivation level of subordinate based on the leadership style of their director. The study was also to find out if there were any differences in motivation level based on the demographic characteristics of subordinates i.e gender, categories of age, level of education and experience. The leader Behavior Description Questionnaire was used as an instrument to measure the leadership style of the director while A Questionnaire Measure the level of motivation of the subordinate. A total of 41 subordinates were chosen by using simple random sampling. The findings of this study shows that there is a significant relationship between leadership styles of a director and the motivation levels of subordinates. The result also shows that success orientation of leadership styles has a significant positive relationship with the level of motivation of subordinates. This study shows that there are a significant differences in the motivation level of subordinates based on the leadership styles oof a director. The findings also show that there are no significant differences betwen levels of motivation of subordinates based on their demographic characteristics. 2004 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/1342/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/1342/1/MOHD._ROFI_B._YUSOF.pdf application/pdf eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/1342/2/1.MOHD._ROFI_B._YUSOF.pdf application/pdf eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia A.R.Elangovan, Jia Lin Xie (2000). Effect of perceived power of supervisor on subordinate work attitudes. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, MCB University Press, Canada. pg 319-328. Ab. Aziz Yusof (2001). Perubahan & Kepimpinan. Sintok, Universiti Utara Malaysia Abd Aziz Osman (1999). Perhubungan Antara Stail Kepemimpinan Ketua Bidang Dengan Kepuasan Kerja Guru-Guru Mata Pelajaran Teknik Dan Vokasional. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan. Serdang. Universiti Putra Malaysia. Abdul Ghani Ishak (1994). Stail Kepermimpinan Pengetua Sekolah Menengah Agama Di Negeri Selangor Darul Ehsan Dan Kaitannya Dengan Kepuasan Bekerja Dikalangan Guru-Guru. Tesis Sarjana yang tidak diterbitkan. Serdang. Universiti Pertanian Malaysia. Ab. Rahim Ahmad dan Shahrul Bariah Md Zain (1990). Pengurusan : Suatu Sudut Pandangan. Kuala Lumpur, Nurin Enterprise. Adair, J. (1989). The action-centered leader. Petaling Jaya:Pelanduk Publications. Aduba-Dike, N. C. (1990). The relationship between the leadership styles of the supervisors of BCBSM and the motivation levels of their subordinates. Disertasi Ed. D. Wayne State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51(08A), 2572. Ahmad Atory Hussain (1991). Pengurusan organisasi. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Alderfer, C. P. (1967). An organizational syndrome. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 440-460. Alderfer, C. P. (1969). "An Empirical Test of a New Theory of Human Needs" Organizational Behavior and Human Performance.4, 142-175. Aminuddin Mohd. Yusof (1990). Kepimpinan: Satu annlisis psikologi. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Aminuddin Mohd. Yusof (1994). Kepimpinan, motivasi dan prestasi: Model guru dan model tentera. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Andrews, R. L. & Morefield, J. (1991). Effective leadership for effective urban schools. Education and Urban Society, 23(3), 270-278. Atkinson, J. W. & Birch. D. (1978). An introduction to motivation. 2nd. New York:D. Van Norstrand Company. Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and stogdill's handbook of leadership. (3th. ed.). New York: Free Press. Boyer, J. E. (1982). Leadership and motivation: A study of the relationship between leadership style and the perceived need satisfaction of administration subordinates. Disertasi Ed. D. The University of Akron. Dissertation Abstracts International, 43 (03A), 599. Chaplin, J.(1985). Dictionary of Psychology. New York: McGraw Hill. Che Noh Muda (1995). Hubungan di antara gaya kepimpinan pengetua dengan tahap motivasi guru-guru Sekolah Berasrama Penuh di Wilayah Persekutuan. Latihan Ilmiah Sarjana Sains Pengurusan yang tidak diterbitkan. Sintok: Universiti Utara Malaysia. Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavior Science. New York,Academic Press Davis, J. A. (1971). Elementary survey analysis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc. Davies, K. (1972). Human Behavior at Work. New York:, Mc Graw Hill Book Co. Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka (1994). Kamus Dewan. Kuala Lumpur, Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka Druckers, P. (1969). The practice of management. New York: Harper & Row. Edmonds, R. R. (1979). Effective school for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37,15-27. Everett, G. B. (1988). A study of the relationship between the principal's leadership style and the level of motivation of teaching staff. Dissertation Ed. D. Tennessee State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51 (02A), 357. Fantini, M. 0. (1986). Regaining excellence in education. Columbus, Ohio: Merrill Publishing Company. Fiedler, F.E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York: McGraw- Hill Book Co. Fiedler, F.E. and J. E. Garcia (1987). New Approaches To Leadership Cognitive Resources And Organization Performance. John Wiley, New York. Gray, J. L. & Starke, F. A. (1984). Organizational behavior: Concept and applications. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill Publishing Company. Gribben, J. J. (1972). Effective managerial leadership. New York: American Management Association. Grune Berg M. M. (1979). Understanding Job Satisfaction. London. The Mac Millan Press Hassan Langgulung (1990). New Theories in Psychology : An Analysis From the Islamic Perspective. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, ABIM Bil. 3 Jilid 3, Dis 1990, halaman 52-67 Heckhausen, H., Schmalt, H. D. & Schneider, K. (1986). Achievement motivation in perspectives. Orlando: Academic Press. Hemphill and Coon (1957) dalam Rahimah Hj. Ahmad (1981). The relationship between and among leadership style, school climate, and student achievement in the elementary school principalship in Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur. Disertasi kedoktoran yang tidak diterbitkan. Universiti California Selatan. Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. H. (1974). Management of organizational behavior Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. H. (1977). Management of organizational behavior. (3th.ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. H. (1988). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources.(5th.ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B. & Synderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work New York: John Wiley & Son Inc. Herzberg, F. (1968). One More Time : How Do You Motivate Employee?. Harvard Business Review. Vol46. No 1, Jan-Feb 1968, muka surat 53-62. House. R. J. & Filley, A. C. (1969). Managerial Process and Organization Behavior. Prentice Hall Inc. House. R. J. (1971). A Path Goal Theory of Leadership Effectiveness : AdministrativeScience Quarterly 16. halaman 321-328. House. R. J. & Mitchell T. R. "Path Goal Theory and Leadership" Journal of Contemporary Business, 3 (1974). halaman 81-97. House. R. J. & L. A. Wigdor. (1975). Herzberzg Dual-Fbctor Theory of Job Satisfaction and Motivation : A Review of Evidence and a Criticism. Personnel Psychology, Vol. 20, No. 4, (Winter 1967), in Steers, R. M. and Porter L. W. (Eds), Motivation and Work Behavior, McGraw Hill, London. Howell, W. C. (1976). Essentials of industrial and organizational psychology. Illinois: The Dorsey Press. Hoy, W. K. & Miskel, C. G. (1991). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice. (4th. ed.). New York: McGraw Hill Inc. Ishak Sin (1993). Perkaitan di antara stail kepimpinan pengetua dengan tahap motivasi guru. Latihan Ilmiah Sarjana Pendidikan yang tidak diterbitkan. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Jennifer Rowley (1996). Motivation on staff in libraries. United kingdom, Library Management, Volume 15 Number 5, MCB Universiti Press. Kamarudin Deraman (1998). Hubungan Gaya Kepimpinan Pengetua Dengan Tahap Motivasi Guru Sekolah Menengah Di Zon Pudu, Luala Lumpur. Tesis Sarjana Sains Pembangunan Sumber Manusia yang tidak diterbitkan : Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. Khaleque, A. & Rahman (1987). Perceived importance of job facets and overall job satisfaction of industrial workers. Human Relations, 40 (7), 401-416. Koontz H. & Weihrich (1988). Management. 9th Edition; New York. McGraw Hill Book Co. Penterjemah Mohd Salim Mohd Sohod dan Sliti Nadzrah Sheikh Omar (2001). Kuala Lumpur, Dewan Bahasa Dan Pustaka. Krahe, M. J. (1991). An analysis of achievement motives, skills, and value and their effect on managerial performance. Disertasi Ph.D. State University of New York in Buffalo. Dissertation Abstracts International, 52 (03A), 823. Kunz, D. W. & Hoy, W. K. (1976). "Leadership Style of Principals and the Professional Zone of Acceptance of teachers" . Educational Administration Quarterly, 12, Fall 1976 Leedy, P. D. (1993). Practical research: Planning and &sign. (5 ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Mahmood Nazar Mohamed & Sabitha Marican (1995). Hubungan manusia dalam organisasi. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publiations & Distrubors Sdn. Bhd. Mark A. Tietjen and Robert M. Myers (1998). Motivation and job satisfaction. Canada.Leadership & Organization Development Journal, MCB University Press. pg 226-231. Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row Publishers, Inc. Maslow, A. H. (1970). Motivation and personality. (Edition). New York: Harper and Row Publishers, Inc. Maslow, A. H. (1962). Toward The Psychology of Being. Princeton, Van Nostrand,USA. McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society. Princeton, New Jersey: D. Van Nostrand Company, Inc. McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A. & Cowel, E. L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York: Appleton-Century-Croft. McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A. & Coviel, E. L. (1976). The achievement motive. (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Croft. McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. McKaig, T. E. (1980). The relationship of principal leadership behavior and faculty motivation in selected Indiana middlel junior high schools. Disertasi Ed. D. Ball State University. Dissertation Abstracts Internal Journal, 41(08A), 3358. Mehrabian, A. & Bank, L. (1978). A questionnaire measure of individual differences in achieving tendency. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 38, 475-478. Mohd. Majid Konting (1990). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohd Yusof Hj . Mohd Sharif (2002). Persepsi Guru-Guru Sekolah Menengah Terhadap Gaya Kepemimpinan Pengetua Serta Kesan Iklim Sekolah Terhadap Persepsi Guru Di Daerah Kangar, Perlis. Latihan Ilmiah Sarjana Pendidikan yang tidak diterbitkan. Morgan, L. E. (1985). The perceived leader behavior of academic deans and its relationship to subordinate job satisfaction. Disertasi Ph. D. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Dissertation Abstracts International, 45 (08A), 2340 Moser, C. A. & Kalton, G. (1977). Survey Method in Social Investigation (2nd Edition).London, Heinemann Rahimah Hj. Ahmad (1981). The relationship between and among leadership style, school climate, and student achievement in the elementary school principal ship in Federal Territory of Kuala Lumpur. Disertasi kedoktoran yang tidak diterbitkan.Universiti California Selatan. Razali Mat Zin (1996). Kepimpinan dalam pengurusan. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Rolland LeBrasseur, Robert Whissel and Abhoy Ojha (2002). Organisational Learning,Transformational Leadership and Implementation of Continuous Quality Improvement in Canadian Hospitals. Australian Journal of Management, Vol. 27, No. 2, December 2002. The Australian Graduate School of Management Salmah Ahmad (1985). Tingkah laku kepimpinan dan hubungan dengan kepuasan kerja di kalangan pekevja yang tugasnya berstruktur dan tidak berstruktur. Latihan Ilmiah Sarjana Muda Sastera (Dengan Kepujian) yang tidak diterbitkan. Bangi :Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Schaefer, S. D. (1977). The Motivation Process. Cambridge, Winthrop Publications Sergiovanni, T. J. (1987). The principalship: A relative practice perspective. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1967). Factors with effect satisfaction and dissatisfaction in teaching. Journal of Educational Administration, 5 (1), 66-82. Smith, M. (1982). Introducing Organizational Behavior. London, Mac Millan Publishers Ltd Steven H. Appelbaum, Normand St-Pierre and William Glavas (1998). Strategic organizational change : the role of leadership, learning, motivation and productivity. Management Decision 3615, MCB University Press,. pg 289-301. Stogdill, R. M. (1969). Personal factors associated with leadership: A survey of the literature. Dalam G. A. Gibb (Ed.). Leadership: Selected readings. Middlesex, England: Penguin Books Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press. Stoner, J. A. F. & Wankel, C. (1989). Pengurusan. Edisi ke-3.(Terjemahan). Petaling Jaya: Amiza Publishing. Suaidah Ahmad (1984). Tingkah laku kepimpinan guru besar dun hubungannya dengan kepuasan kerja, tekanan dun prestasi kerja guru-guru. Latihan ilmiah Sarjana Muda Sastera (Dengan Kepujian) yang tidak diterbitkan. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Tannenbaum, Robert. (1958). How To Chose A Leardership Pattern. Harvard Business Review. Tomi, V. E. (1985). Leadership and motivation: Perceived leadership style and perceived faculty need satisfaction. Disertasi Ed. D. The University of Akron. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46 (05A), 1157. Uma Sekaran (1999). Research Methods For Business : A Skill-Building Approach-3rd Edition. New York, John Wiley & Sons Inc Waber, M. (1948). "Bureaucracy " . Di dalam Gerth. H. H. dan Mills, C. W. From Max Waber, London : Routledge & Kegan Paul. Wan Azmi Ramli (1990). Pengurusan Masa Kini. Kuala Lumpur, Utusan Publication & Distribution Sdn Bhd. Wagner Jr., Richard A. (1992), The Leadership Process, Engineer. Source : Engineer, Feb92, Vol22, Issue 1, page 32-36 Yaacob Ismail (1995). Hubungan di antara stail kepimpinan pengetua dengan tahap motivasi guru-guru sekolah menengah di Jajahan Tumpat, Kelantan. Latihan Ilmiah Sarjana Sains Pengurusan yang tidak diterbitkan. Sintok: Universiti Utara Malaysia. Yukl, G. A. & Van Fleet, D. D. (1992). Theory and research on leadership in organizations. Dalam M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.) Handbook of industrial and organization psychology (2nd ed.). California: Consulting Psychologist Press. Yukl, G. A. (1989). Leadership in organization (2nd. ed.). New Jersey: Prentice- Hall. Yusuf Ismail (1986). Motivasipencapaian dun gaya pembelajaran di kalangan siswazah Diploma Pendidikan. Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 2, 95-118. Zaidatun Tasir dan Mohd Salleh Abu (2003). Analisis Data Berkomputer SPSS 11.5 for windows. Kuala Lumpur, Venton Publishing (M) Sdn. Bhd.

Similar Items