Kepemimpinan Pengetua Mengikut Gender dan Tahap Motivasi Guru Sekolah Menengah di Daerah Kota Setar, Kedah Darul Aman

Kepemimpinan Pengetua Mengikut Gender dan Tahap Motivasi Guru Sekolah Menengah di Daerah Kota Setar, Kedah Darul Aman

The purpose of this research is to see the relationship between the principal leadership by gender and the teacher's motivation at eight secondary school in Kota Star area, Kedah Darul Aman. The dimension of leadership style observe are the work structure and considerate. The research also see...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nordin, Wan Daud
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2004
Subjects:
LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/1390/1/NORDIN_B._WAN_DAUD.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/1390/2/1.NORDIN_B._WAN_DAUD.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.1390
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
topic LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Nordin, Wan Daud
Kepemimpinan Pengetua Mengikut Gender dan Tahap Motivasi Guru Sekolah Menengah di Daerah Kota Setar, Kedah Darul Aman
description The purpose of this research is to see the relationship between the principal leadership by gender and the teacher's motivation at eight secondary school in Kota Star area, Kedah Darul Aman. The dimension of leadership style observe are the work structure and considerate. The research also see the difference in teacher's motivation base on the principal leadership style. The research also aim in determine whether the difference between the teacher's motivation base on demographic characteristic (sex, category of service and teaching experience) occurs. Instrument The Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ) build by Halpin (1966) and modified by researcher are use in measuring principal leadership style. Where else instrument A Questionnaire Measure of Individual Differences in Achieving Tendency (QMAT) build by Mehrabian and Bank (1978) are use in measuring teacher's motivation. Respondent for this research are the teachers from eight school in Kota Star area, Kedah Darul Aman. The number of research population sample are about 240 teachers from the school concern. Respondent involve in this research are 30 teachers from every school that are observe and are choose at random. Pioneer research are done at Simpang Kuala National Secondary School , Alor Star, Kedah Darul Aman (Men Principal) and Darul Aman National Secondary School, Alor Star, Kedah Darul Aman (Women Principal). In general, the output of the research found that it occurs a relationship between the principal leadership style by gender and the teacher's motivation at eight school in Kota Star area, Kedah Darul Aman.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Nordin, Wan Daud
author_facet Nordin, Wan Daud
author_sort Nordin, Wan Daud
title Kepemimpinan Pengetua Mengikut Gender dan Tahap Motivasi Guru Sekolah Menengah di Daerah Kota Setar, Kedah Darul Aman
title_short Kepemimpinan Pengetua Mengikut Gender dan Tahap Motivasi Guru Sekolah Menengah di Daerah Kota Setar, Kedah Darul Aman
title_full Kepemimpinan Pengetua Mengikut Gender dan Tahap Motivasi Guru Sekolah Menengah di Daerah Kota Setar, Kedah Darul Aman
title_fullStr Kepemimpinan Pengetua Mengikut Gender dan Tahap Motivasi Guru Sekolah Menengah di Daerah Kota Setar, Kedah Darul Aman
title_full_unstemmed Kepemimpinan Pengetua Mengikut Gender dan Tahap Motivasi Guru Sekolah Menengah di Daerah Kota Setar, Kedah Darul Aman
title_sort kepemimpinan pengetua mengikut gender dan tahap motivasi guru sekolah menengah di daerah kota setar, kedah darul aman
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Sekolah Siswazah
publishDate 2004
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/1390/1/NORDIN_B._WAN_DAUD.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/1390/2/1.NORDIN_B._WAN_DAUD.pdf
_version_ 1747827136600735744
spelling my-uum-etd.13902013-07-24T12:11:45Z Kepemimpinan Pengetua Mengikut Gender dan Tahap Motivasi Guru Sekolah Menengah di Daerah Kota Setar, Kedah Darul Aman 2004 Nordin, Wan Daud Sekolah Siswazah Graduate School LB2801-3095 School administration and organization The purpose of this research is to see the relationship between the principal leadership by gender and the teacher's motivation at eight secondary school in Kota Star area, Kedah Darul Aman. The dimension of leadership style observe are the work structure and considerate. The research also see the difference in teacher's motivation base on the principal leadership style. The research also aim in determine whether the difference between the teacher's motivation base on demographic characteristic (sex, category of service and teaching experience) occurs. Instrument The Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire (LBDQ) build by Halpin (1966) and modified by researcher are use in measuring principal leadership style. Where else instrument A Questionnaire Measure of Individual Differences in Achieving Tendency (QMAT) build by Mehrabian and Bank (1978) are use in measuring teacher's motivation. Respondent for this research are the teachers from eight school in Kota Star area, Kedah Darul Aman. The number of research population sample are about 240 teachers from the school concern. Respondent involve in this research are 30 teachers from every school that are observe and are choose at random. Pioneer research are done at Simpang Kuala National Secondary School , Alor Star, Kedah Darul Aman (Men Principal) and Darul Aman National Secondary School, Alor Star, Kedah Darul Aman (Women Principal). In general, the output of the research found that it occurs a relationship between the principal leadership style by gender and the teacher's motivation at eight school in Kota Star area, Kedah Darul Aman. 2004 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/1390/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/1390/1/NORDIN_B._WAN_DAUD.pdf application/pdf eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/1390/2/1.NORDIN_B._WAN_DAUD.pdf application/pdf eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Aamodt, M. G. (1991). Applied industrial organizational psychology. California: Wadsworth Publishing Company. Abdul Karim Mohd. Nor (1989). Characteristics of effective rural secondary schools in Malaysia. Disertasi PhD yang tidak diterbitkan. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Adair, J. (1989). The action-centered leader. Petaling Jaya : Pelanduk . Publication. Adams, B. P. (1988). Leader behavior of principals and its effect on the teacher burnout.Disertasi Ph. D. University of Wisconsin-Madison. Dissertation Abstracts International, 49(06A), 1317. Adam, J . S. (1985). Inequity in social exchange. dalam L. Berkowitz, (ed) Advances in experimental social psychology. New York : Academic Press. Aduba-Dike, N. C. (1990). The relationship between the leadership styles of the supervisors of BCBSM and the motivation levels of their subordinates. Disertasi Ed.D. Wayne State University. Dissertation abstracts international 51 (08A), 2572. Ahmad Atory Hussain (1991). Pengurusan organisasi. Kuala Lumpur : Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Alderfer, C. P. (1967). An organizational syndrome. Administrative science quarterly, 12,440-460. Aminuddin Mohd. Yusof. (1990). Kepimpinan : Satu analisis psikologi. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Anderson, M. B.G. & Iwanicki, E. F. (1984). Teacher motivation and its relationship to burnout. Educational Administration Quarterly, 20 (21, 109-132). Andrews, R. L. & Morefield, J. (1991). Effective leadership for effective urban schools. Education and Urban Social 23(3), 270-278. Atkinson, J. W. & Birch. D. (1978). An introduction to motivation. New York: D. Van Norstrand Company. Bass, B. M. (1981). Stogdill's handbook of leadership. New York : Free Press. Bass, B. M. (1990). Bass and Stogdill' s handbook of leadership. (3th. ed.). New York : FreePress. Bass, B.M. dan Avalio, B. J. (1990). Developing transformational leadership, dalam Journal of European Industrial Training, 14 : ha1.21-27. Blake, R. R. dan Mouton, J. S. (1994), The Managerial grid key orientation for achieving production through people, Houston : Gulp Boyer, J. E. (1982). Leadership and motivation : A study of the relationship between leadership style and the perceived need satisfaction of administration subordinates. Disertasi Ed. D. The University of Akron. Dissertation Abstracts International, 43 (03A), 599. Chacko, H. E. (1990). Method of upward influence,motivation needs, and Administrators' perceptions of their supervisors' leadership style. Group & Organization Studies: An International Journal, 15(3), 253-265. Chaplin, J.(1985). Dictionary of Psychology. New York : McGraw Hill. Che Noh Muda..(1995). Hubungan di antara gaya kepimpinan pengetua dengan tahap motivasi guru-guru sekolah berasrama penuh di Wilayah Persekutuan. Latihan Ilmiah Sarjana Sains Pengurusan yang tidak diterbitkan. Sintok: Universiti Utara Malaysia. Chek Mat.(2003). Kemahiran memimpin, Kuala Lumpur : Utusan Publications and Distributors Sdn.Bhd. Davis, J. A. (1971). Elementary survey analysis.New Jersey: Prentice-Hall Inc. Druckers, P. (1969). The practice of management. New York: Harper & Row. Edmonds, R. R. (1979). Effective school for the urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37, 15-27. Everett, G. B. (1988). A study of the relationship between the principal's leadership style and the level of motivation of teaching staff Dissertasi Ed. D. Tennessee State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 51 (02A), 357. Fantini, M. 0. (1986). Regaining excellence in education. Columbus, Ohio : Menill Publishing Company. Fiedler, F. E. (1967). A theory of leadership effectiveness. New York : McGraw- Hill Book Co. Gay, L. R. (1992). Educational research: Competencies for. analysis and application. (4th ed). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Ghiselli, E. E. (1963), Intelligence and managerial success, dalam Psychological Report 12 Gribben, 5.5. (1972). Effective managerial leadership. :New York : American Management Association. Hall, G., Rutherford, W. L., Hord, S. M. & Huling, L. L. (1084). Effects of three principal styles on school improvement. Educational leadership, 41(5), 22-29. Halpin, A. W. (1966). Theory and research in administration. New York : Macmillan Co. Hanafi Kamal (1990) Implikasi beberapa teori kepada kepimpinan di sekolah. Suara Pendidik. 13-14 (3&4), 28-32. Heckhausen, H., Schrnalt,H. D. & Schneider, K. (1985). Achievement motivation in perspectives. Orlando : Academic Press. Hemphill, J. K. dan Coon, A. E. (1957), Development of the Leader Behavior Description Questionnaire, dalam Leader Behavior : Its Description and Measurement,Colombus,Bureau of Bussiness Research,Ohio State University. Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K. H. (1988). Management of organizational behavior: Utilizing human resources.(5th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B. & Synderman, B. (1959). The motivation to work New York : John Wiley & Son Inc. Hollander, E. P. (1984). Leadership dynamic: A practical guide to effective relationship. New York: Free Press. Holtzman, M. (1992). Do we really need leadership. Educational leadership . 49 (9 ,36. House R . J. (1977). Theory of charismatic leadership.,dalam Hunt,J.G. dan Larson , L.L. (ed). Leadership : the cutting edge, Carbondale :Universiti of Illinois Press. House, R. J. dan Evan G. Martin. (1974). Path Goal : Theory of leadership. dalam Journal of Contemporary, Business, 3.4,hal. 81-98. Howell, W. C. (1976). Essentials of industrial and organizational psychology. Illinois : The Dorsey Press. Hoy, W. K. & Miskel, C. G. (1991). Educational administration: Theory, research and practice. (4th. ed.). New York: McGraw Hill Inc. Ibrahim Mamat.(2001). Pengetua sekolah menangani isu dan cabaran kepemimpinan. Kumpulan Budiman Sdn.Bhd. Kuala Lumpur. Idris Zakaria, (1986). Teori kenegaraan al- farabi. Bangi : Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Ishak Sin (1993). Perkaitan di antara stail kepimpinan pengetua dengan tahap motivasi guru. Latihan Ilmiah Sarjana Pendidikan yang tidak diterbitkan. Bangi : Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Ismail Noor. (2000). Kepimpinan Nabi Muhammad s.a. w. pengurusan altruistic . Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications dan Distributor. Jacobs, C. L. & Ary,D. (1990). Introduction to research in education. Orlando: Harcourt Brande Collage Publishers. Johnson, R.S. (1977). Leadership for the quality transformation. New York : Panlist Press. Kamaruddin Deraman. (1997). Hubungan gaya kepemimpinan pengetua dengan tahap motivasi guru sekolah menengah di zon Pudu, Kuala Lumpur. Tesis Sarjana Universiti Malaysia Sarawak. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (1990). Pukal latihan kurikulum bersepadu sekolah Menengah : Bahan sumber tambahan. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Kirkpatrick, S. A. dan Locke, E. A. (1991). Leadership : Do traits matters, dalam Academy of Management Executive, 5(2) hal. 48-60. Krause, D. G. (1996). Sun - Tzu The art of war for executives, London : Nicholas Brealey. Leedy, P. D. (1993). Practical research: Planning and design. (58. ed.). New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Lewin,K.Lippit, R.(1938). An experimental approach to the study of autocracy and democracy A preliminary note,dalam Biometric hlm.292-300. Lewin,K.Lippit7R.(1938 ),Likert, R. (1967). The human organization. New York: McGraw-Hill. Long, H. H. (1970). Peranan guru besar dalam negara membangun. Jurnal Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, 14(36-38), 5-17. Lunnenberg, F. C. & Omstein, A. C. (1991). Educational administration : concepts and practices. California : Wadsmauth Publishing Company. Luthan, F.L. Introduction to management : A contingency approach,New York : McGraw-Hill. Mahamad Zabri Min (2003). Dalam Chek Mat. Kemahiran memimpin. Kuala Lumpur : Utusan Publications and Distributors. Mahrnood Nazar Mohamed & Sabitha Marican (1995). Hubungan manusia dalam organisasi. Kuala Lumpur : Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Maslow, A. H. (1954). Motivation and personality. New York : Harper and Row Publishers, Inc.McClelland, D. C. (1961). The achieving society.Princeton, New Jersey :D.Van Nostrand Company, Inc. McClelland, D. C ., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R . A. & Cowel, E . L. (1953). The achievement motive. New York : Appleton-Century-Croft. McClelland, D. C., Atkinson, J. W., Clark, R. A. & Cowel E . L. (1976). The achievement motive. (2nd ed.). New York: Appleton-Century-Croft. McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of enterprise. Ne:w York : McGraw - Hill Book Co. McKaig, T. E. (1980). The relationship of principal leadership behavior and faculty motivation in selected Indiana middle /junior high schools Disertasi Ed.D. Ball State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 41(08h), 3358. Mehrabian, A. & Bank, L. (1978). A questionnaire measure of individual differences in achieving tendency. Educational and psychological measurement, 38,475-478. Miller, L. E. (1991). Agriculture educations 1:885 research methods. Columbus. Ohio : The Ohio State University. Mohd. Majid Konting (1990). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur : Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohd. Zin Sham & Faridah Abu Hassan (1989). Beban tugas pengetua, penolong kanan dan penyelia petang: Satu kajian ringkas. Jurnal Guru, l,42-45. Nahavandi, A (2000), The art and science of leadership, New Jersey, Prentice Hall. Ouchi, W. G. (1981). Theory Z : How American business can meet the Japanese challenge. New York : Avons Books. Razali Mat Zin (1996). Kepimpinan dalam pengurusan. Kuala Lumpur : Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Roe, W. H. & Drake, T. L. (1980). The principal ship. New York : McMillan Publishing Co. Scholter,P.R. (1998). The leader's handbook,New York : McGraw-Hill. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1987). The principal ship: A relative practice perspective. Boston : Allyn & Bacon. Sergiovanni, T J. (1967). Factors with effect satisfaction and dissatisfaction in teaching. Journal of Educational Administration, 5 (1), 66-82. Singer, F. L. (1984). A study of the relationship between teacher burnout and the leadership style of the principal as perceived by the teacher. Disertasi Ed. D. Tennessee State University. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46 (10 A). 2883. Skinner ,B. F. (1970). Educational psychology. New Delhi: Prentice - Hall. Stogdill, R. M. (1974). Handbook of leadership. New York: Free Press. Sweeney, J. (1982). Research synthesis on effective school leadership. Educational Leadership,39(5), 346-352. Tannenbaum, R.dan Schmidt, W.(1968). How to choose a leadership patterns? : Organizational Behavior and the Practice of Management,Glanview,II : Scott.Foresman dan Co. Tomi, V. E. (1985). Leadership and motivation: Perceived leadership style and perceived faculty need satisfaction. Disertasi Ed. D. The University of Akron. Dissertation Abstracts International, 46 (05A), 1157. Vr0om.V. H. dan Yetton .(1973). Leadership and decision making, Pittburgh : Pittburgh Press. Wan Mohd. Zahid Mohd. Nordin (1993). Wawasan pendidikan : Agenda pengisian. Kuala Lumpur: Nurin Enterprise. Wan Liz Oman Wan Omar.(2000). Gagasan alaf baru, Kuala Lumpur : Thinker's Library Sdn-Bhd. William .M.(1998). Mastering leadership. London : Thorogood. Yaacob Ismail (1995). Hubungan di antara stail kepimpinan pengetua dengan tahap motivasi guru-guru sekolah menengah di Jajahan Tumpat, Kelantan. Latihan Ilmiah Sarjana Sains Pengurusan yang tidak diterbitkan. Sintok: Universiti Utara Malaysia. Yukl, G. A. & Van Fleet, D. D (1992). Theory and research on leadership in organizations dalam M. D. Dunnette & L. M. Hough (Eds.) Handbook of industrial and organization psychology (2nd ed.). California: Consulting Psychologist Press. Yukl, G. A. (1989). Leadership in organization (2nd-e d.). New Jersey : Prentice-Hall. Yusuf Ismail (1986). Motivasi pencapaian dan gaya pembelajaran di kalangan Siswazah Diploma Pendidikan.Jurnal Psikologi Malaysia, 2,95-118. Zaidatol Akmaliah Lope Pihie, (1990). Pentadbiran pendidikan Kuala Lumpur : Fajar Bakti. Zainal Abidin Ahrnad (1998). Perlakuan organisasi, Shah Alarn : Fajar Bakti.

Similar Items