Hubungan Faktor Komuniksi dan Tahap Keberkesanan dalam Sistem Pemerintahan dan Pengawalan TLDM

The aim of this research is to determine the level of communication effectiveness within the Command and Control System of the Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN). The conducts of this research is aimed at testing whether there is a relationship and influence of independent variable in the communication fac...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Zamzelina, Ahmad
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2009
Subjects:	HD28-70 Management Industrial Management
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/1689/1/LT_KDR_ZAMZELINA_BT_AHMAD_TLDM.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/1689/2/1.LT_KDR_ZAMZELINA_BT_AHMAD_TLDM.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.1689
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
topic	HD28-70 Management Industrial Management
spellingShingle	HD28-70 Management Industrial Management Zamzelina, Ahmad Hubungan Faktor Komuniksi dan Tahap Keberkesanan dalam Sistem Pemerintahan dan Pengawalan TLDM
description	The aim of this research is to determine the level of communication effectiveness within the Command and Control System of the Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN). The conducts of this research is aimed at testing whether there is a relationship and influence of independent variable in the communication factor such as the communication structure, communication skills, communication medium, communication network and other assumptions towards dependant variable that is the communication effectiveness. The research was conducted on officers and men of the Stesen Komunikasi TLDM (SKTLDM) in Kuala Lumpur and Lumut, Perak.This study was done using questionnaires designed by the researcher Taufik (2001) based on the findings on his research regarding communication that he conducted and tailor to suit the RMN organization. A total of 260 respondents made up of officers and men from the RMN were selected at proportionate stratified random sampling approach by using a list of names and ranks to participate in this study. The data collected were analyzed and tested using statistical descriptive and inference method like Pearson Correlation and Multiple Regression. The findings showed that the level of effective communication is in tandem with the communication factors within the RMN Command and Control System. This study also demonstrates that a significant and strong positive relationship exists between communication factors such as communication structure,communication skills, communication medium, communication network and other assumptions with communication effectiveness. The Multiple Regression Test on the other hand shows that there is a significant influence between communication factors and its effectiveness.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Zamzelina, Ahmad
author_facet	Zamzelina, Ahmad
author_sort	Zamzelina, Ahmad
title	Hubungan Faktor Komuniksi dan Tahap Keberkesanan dalam Sistem Pemerintahan dan Pengawalan TLDM
title_short	Hubungan Faktor Komuniksi dan Tahap Keberkesanan dalam Sistem Pemerintahan dan Pengawalan TLDM
title_full	Hubungan Faktor Komuniksi dan Tahap Keberkesanan dalam Sistem Pemerintahan dan Pengawalan TLDM
title_fullStr	Hubungan Faktor Komuniksi dan Tahap Keberkesanan dalam Sistem Pemerintahan dan Pengawalan TLDM
title_full_unstemmed	Hubungan Faktor Komuniksi dan Tahap Keberkesanan dalam Sistem Pemerintahan dan Pengawalan TLDM
title_sort	hubungan faktor komuniksi dan tahap keberkesanan dalam sistem pemerintahan dan pengawalan tldm
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	College of Business (COB)
publishDate	2009
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/1689/1/LT_KDR_ZAMZELINA_BT_AHMAD_TLDM.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/1689/2/1.LT_KDR_ZAMZELINA_BT_AHMAD_TLDM.pdf
_version_	1804888202909057024
spelling	my-uum-etd.16892024-03-20T06:18:32Z Hubungan Faktor Komuniksi dan Tahap Keberkesanan dalam Sistem Pemerintahan dan Pengawalan TLDM 2009 Zamzelina, Ahmad College of Business (COB) College of Business HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management The aim of this research is to determine the level of communication effectiveness within the Command and Control System of the Royal Malaysian Navy (RMN). The conducts of this research is aimed at testing whether there is a relationship and influence of independent variable in the communication factor such as the communication structure, communication skills, communication medium, communication network and other assumptions towards dependant variable that is the communication effectiveness. The research was conducted on officers and men of the Stesen Komunikasi TLDM (SKTLDM) in Kuala Lumpur and Lumut, Perak.This study was done using questionnaires designed by the researcher Taufik (2001) based on the findings on his research regarding communication that he conducted and tailor to suit the RMN organization. A total of 260 respondents made up of officers and men from the RMN were selected at proportionate stratified random sampling approach by using a list of names and ranks to participate in this study. The data collected were analyzed and tested using statistical descriptive and inference method like Pearson Correlation and Multiple Regression. The findings showed that the level of effective communication is in tandem with the communication factors within the RMN Command and Control System. This study also demonstrates that a significant and strong positive relationship exists between communication factors such as communication structure,communication skills, communication medium, communication network and other assumptions with communication effectiveness. The Multiple Regression Test on the other hand shows that there is a significant influence between communication factors and its effectiveness. 2009 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/1689/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/1689/1/LT_KDR_ZAMZELINA_BT_AHMAD_TLDM.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/1689/2/1.LT_KDR_ZAMZELINA_BT_AHMAD_TLDM.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Alberts, D.S., Garstka, J.J. & Stein, F.S. (1999). Network Centric Warfare Developing and Leveraging Information Superiority. 2nd Edition (Revised)., 15-22.Birkner,R.M. & Birkner, L.R. (2001). Overcoming roadblocks to effective learning and communication. Occupational Hazards, 63(4),12-13.Buchanan, D. & Huczynski, A. (1997). Organizational Behaviour: An Introductory Text, dalam Kelly, D. (Ed.). Leadership & Organizational Journal, 1(21), 93.Campling, J., Poole, D., Wiesner, R. & Schermerhorn, J.R. (2006).Management. 2nd Asia-Pasific Edition. 478-479.Che Su, M. (2004), Peranan Budaya Organisasi Selaku Pemboleh Ubah Pengubah dalam Hubungan antara Komunikasi Organisasi dan Kepuasan Kerja. The Malaysian Journal of Language and Communication. 1(1), 21-52.Chua, Y.P. (2006). Kaedah dan statistik penyelidikan Buku 1. McGraw Hill Education. Malaysia.Coakes, S.J. & Steed, L. (2008). SPSS Ver. 15 for Window. John Wiley & Sons Australia Ltd.Daniels, T.D. & Spiker, B.K. (1994). Perspectives on Organizational Communication. Madison. WCB Brown & Benchmark.Danyal, B.A. (2002). Masalah Komunikasi dan Cadangan Peningkatan, Memorandum to Chief of Navy dated 20 Jun 2002.Denton, D.K. (1993), Open Communication, Business Horizon. 36 (5);64-69.Eisenberg, E.M., Miller, K.I. & Monge, P.R. (1983). Involvement in Communication Networks as a Preditor of Organizational Commitment. Human Communication Research. 10(2): 179-201.Farace, R.V. & Mcdonald, D. (1974). New Directions in the Study of Organizational Communication. Personnel Psychology. 27:1-15. Farace, R.V., Monge, P.R. & Russel, H.M. (1977), Communicating and organizing. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.Farace, R.V., Taylor, J.A. & Stewart, J.P. (1978). Criteria for Evaluation of Organizational Effectiveness: Review and Synthesis,Communication Yearbook II, Transaction Publishers.Frank, A.D. & Brownell, J.L. (1989). Organizational communication and behavior: Communicating to improve performance. Holt, Rinehart and Winston Inc. Gary, T.H. (1989). Communication Skills in the Organization. Englewood Cliff, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Gildea, J.A. (1981). Employees judge effectiveness of internal communication. Journal of Organizational Communication, 10 (3),3-10.Goldhaber, G.M. (1990). Komunikasi dalam organisasi. Kuala Lumpur.Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka.Goldhaber, G.M. (1992). Komunikasi dalam organisasi. Terjemahan oleh Omardin Hj. Ashaari dan Azahar Raswan Dean Wan Din, Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Goldhaber, G. M. (1993). Organizational Communication. 6th Edition.MC. Graw Hill. USA Goldhaber, G., Yates, M., Porter, D. & Lesniak, R. (1978).Organizational communication: State of the art. Human Communication Research, 5, 76-96.Hair, J.F., Money, A.H., Samouel, P. & Page, M. (2007). Research method for business. England: John Wiley & Son Ltd.Hargreaves, J. (1977). Good communications; what every manager should need to know. Halsted Press, a Division of John Wiley & sons Inc, New York.Harjit, S.G. (1993), Proses Komunikasi dan Hubungan dengan Kepuasan Kerja dan Prestasi Kerja. Latihan Ilmiah, Bangi: UKM.Hashim Fauzy Yaacob. (2001). Komunikasi antara manusia. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Johor. Hassan, A.B. & Bahtiar, M. (2003). Amalan komuikasi ketua-subordinat dan kepuasan kerja. Simposium Penyelidikan Komunikasi Ke-8,Penyertaan dalam Komunikasi: Hak, bentuk dan dasar, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi.61 Hershey, G.L. & Kizzier, D.L. (1992), Planning and implementing enduser information systems. Cincinnati, OH: South-Western.Ito, J.K. & Peterson, R.B. (1986). Effects of task difficulty and interunit interdependent on information processing systems. Academy of Management Journal, 29(1), 139-149.Jamaliah, J. (2002). Hubungan komunikasi pengurus-pekerja dengan kepuasan kerja dan komitmen pekerja: Satu kajian di Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia. Tesis M.Sc., Universiti Utara Malaysia.Jojlke, M.C. & Duhan, D.F. (2000). Supervisor communication practices and service employee job outcomes. Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 154-165.Kelly, D. (2000). Using vision to improve organizational communication,Leadership & Organizational Journal, 21(4), 92-101.Lee, J. (2001). Leader-member exchange, perceived organizational justice and cooperative communication. Management Communication Quarterly, 14(4), p574.Leong, S.M., (2001). Communication State in the RMN, Memorandum to Deputy Chief of Navy bertarikh 30 Jan 01. Maimunah, O. (2000).Komunikasi berkesan – hubungan interpersonal.Kuala Lumpur: Institut Tadbiran Awam Negara. McDonald, T. (2000). Plain and simple. Successful Meetings, 49(5), 32.Mohd, R.A.W. (2006). Kajian Hubungan Amalan Komunikasi Penyelia-Pekerja Dengan Kepuasan Kerja Di Kalangan Pegawai dan Anggota Cawangan Khas Kontinjen Pahang. Tesis M.Sc. UUM.Mottaz, C.J. (1981), The relative importance of intrinsic and extrinsic rewards as determinants of work satisfaction. The Sociological Quarterly, 26 (3), 365-385.Nik, H.N.M. (1994), “Kesan Komunikasi Ketua-Pekerja Ke Atas Kepuasan Kerja dan Iltizam Pekerja Kepada Organisasi: Tinjauan Di Sebuah Kilang Elektronik Di Bandar Baru Bangi Selangor Darul Ehsan”- Tesis Sarjana, UKM.Nizam, M.K. (2007). Hubungan ciri-ciri personaliti dengan menghadapi perubahan organisasi. Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah,Malaysia.62 Norkiah, K. (1981), Hubungan Di Antara Ketegangan Dan Kepuasan Kerja Di Kalangan Guru-guru: Satu Kajian Kes. Latihan Ilmiah,UKM.Pace, R.W. & Faules, D.F. (1994). Organizational Communication.Englewood Cliff, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc. Parkinson, C.N. & Rustomji, M.K. (1992), Kepimpinan Dalam Pengurusan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Pepper, G.L. (1995). Communicating in Organization: A Cultural Approach. McGraw-Hill, Inc.Razali, M.Z. (1997). Kepimpinan Dalam Pengurusan. Utusan Publication & Distributors Sdn. Bhd.Saodah, W., Narimah, I. & Mohd, Y.H., (2006), Teori-teori Komunikasi.Siri Komunikasi, PTS Professional, Kuala Lumpur.Seah, K.S. (1989), Pengaruh Iklim Komunikasi Ke Atas Kepuasan Kerja dan Prestasi Kerja Di Kalangan Jurujual Perusahaan Terus.Latihan Ilmiah, UKM. Seiler, W.J. (1996). Communication - Foundations, Skills And Applications. Third Edition. Nebraska, US: Harper Collins. Sekaran, U. (2003), Research Methods For Business. A Skill Building Approach. Fourth Edition, John Wiley and Sons Inc., USA.Sharifah, B., Joki, P.S. & Balan, R. (2007), Hubungan antara Komunikasi Dalam Organisasi dengan Kepuasan Kerja, Prestasi Kerja dan Komitmen Kerja. Latihan Ilmiah, Bangi: UKM.Sillars, S. (1988). Success in Communication. Suffolk: John Murray.Smith, P.C., Kendall, L.M. & Hulin, L. (1969), Measurement of satisfaction in work and retirement: A strategy for the study of attitudes. Chicago: Rand McNally.Sulaiman Masri, (1995). Kemahiran Berkomunikasi: Komunikasi Berkesan. Dewan Masyarakat, Jun 95, 52-53. Taufik, A.S. (2001). Faktor-faktor yang menentukan keberkesanan komunikasi: satu kajian di Jabatan Kastam Diraja Malaysia,Negeri Pahang. Universiti Utara Malaysia, Kedah, Malaysia.Timm, P.R. dan De Tienne, K.B. (1995). Managerial Communication.Englewood Cliff, N.J.:Prentice-Hall, Inc.63 Tushman, M.L. (1979). Work characteristics and subunit communication structure: A contingency analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 82-98.Tushman, M.L. (1979), Impact of Perceived Environmental Variability on Patterns of Work Related Communication. Academy of Management Journal, 22 (3), 482-500.Zeffane, Rachid, M. dan Gul, F.A. (1993), The Effects of Task Characteristics and Subunits Structure on Dimensions of Information Processing. Information Processing & Management,29 (6), 703-19.Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L. Dan Parasuraman, A. (1988),Communication and Control Processes in the Delivery of Service Quality, Journal of Marketing, 52 (April), 35-48.Zulkifli, W.H. (2002). Masalah Sistem Komunikasi TLDM dan Kaedah Penyelesaian, Kertas Kerja Seminar Komunikasi 1/2002.

Hubungan Faktor Komuniksi dan Tahap Keberkesanan dalam Sistem Pemerintahan dan Pengawalan TLDM

Similar Items