Pengaruh Personaliti dan Motivasi Pembelajaran ke atas Pembangunan Kerjaya
This study intend to study whether proactive personality and learning motivation can influence career development in order to be more sustainable and try to overcome the ability and the issue of interest declining toward Malaysian Army Officers. Proactive personality and learning motivation factor m...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Thesis |
| Language: | eng eng |
| Published: |
2009
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://etd.uum.edu.my/1692/1/AMINULLAH_BIN_HAJI_OMAR.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/1692/2/1.AMINULLAH_BIN_HAJI_OMAR.pdf |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
| id |
my-uum-etd.1692 |
|---|---|
| record_format |
uketd_dc |
| institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
| collection |
UUM ETD |
| language |
eng eng |
| topic |
HD58.7 Organizational Behavior. |
| spellingShingle |
HD58.7 Organizational Behavior. Aminullah, Haji Omar Pengaruh Personaliti dan Motivasi Pembelajaran ke atas Pembangunan Kerjaya |
| description |
This study intend to study whether proactive personality and learning motivation can influence career development in order to be more sustainable and try to overcome the ability and the issue of interest declining toward Malaysian Army Officers. Proactive personality and learning motivation factor made as independent variable while career
development factor as dependent variable. Correlation and regression test as well as difference test will be implemented based on information derived from data gathered through questionnaire forms which circulated and as much as 215 forms was returned. Accumulated data were analyzed by using Statistical Package software for Social Science (SPSS)
version 15.0. ANOVA test perpetrated upon demographic factors namely sex, age, long in service, academic and long level in present post to see the difference. Result from the test show that only age give different effects on variable while those other had no significant difference. Results from analysis test show that there are significant correlation between independent variable with the dependent variable. Learning motivation has great value weight namely beta value .440 compared to proactive personality only has value of .148 and shown not significant on the career
development factor. Result of the multiple regression test show that both of independent variable is significant with F-value as much as 49.57 and as much as 31.2% variation measured as value influence. It proven that proactive personality and learning motivation are able to influence the career development in military organization as well as replying the objectives and the issues of this study. However Armed Forces must have more laborious planning to wide the scope of learning motivation among officers for the success in their career. |
| format |
Thesis |
| qualification_name |
masters |
| qualification_level |
Master's degree |
| author |
Aminullah, Haji Omar |
| author_facet |
Aminullah, Haji Omar |
| author_sort |
Aminullah, Haji Omar |
| title |
Pengaruh Personaliti dan Motivasi Pembelajaran ke atas Pembangunan Kerjaya |
| title_short |
Pengaruh Personaliti dan Motivasi Pembelajaran ke atas Pembangunan Kerjaya |
| title_full |
Pengaruh Personaliti dan Motivasi Pembelajaran ke atas Pembangunan Kerjaya |
| title_fullStr |
Pengaruh Personaliti dan Motivasi Pembelajaran ke atas Pembangunan Kerjaya |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Pengaruh Personaliti dan Motivasi Pembelajaran ke atas Pembangunan Kerjaya |
| title_sort |
pengaruh personaliti dan motivasi pembelajaran ke atas pembangunan kerjaya |
| granting_institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
| granting_department |
College of Business (COB) |
| publishDate |
2009 |
| url |
https://etd.uum.edu.my/1692/1/AMINULLAH_BIN_HAJI_OMAR.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/1692/2/1.AMINULLAH_BIN_HAJI_OMAR.pdf |
| _version_ |
1747827190031974400 |
| spelling |
my-uum-etd.16922022-04-21T03:36:17Z Pengaruh Personaliti dan Motivasi Pembelajaran ke atas Pembangunan Kerjaya 2009 Aminullah, Haji Omar College of Business (COB) College of Business HD58.7 Organizational Behavior. This study intend to study whether proactive personality and learning motivation can influence career development in order to be more sustainable and try to overcome the ability and the issue of interest declining toward Malaysian Army Officers. Proactive personality and learning motivation factor made as independent variable while career development factor as dependent variable. Correlation and regression test as well as difference test will be implemented based on information derived from data gathered through questionnaire forms which circulated and as much as 215 forms was returned. Accumulated data were analyzed by using Statistical Package software for Social Science (SPSS) version 15.0. ANOVA test perpetrated upon demographic factors namely sex, age, long in service, academic and long level in present post to see the difference. Result from the test show that only age give different effects on variable while those other had no significant difference. Results from analysis test show that there are significant correlation between independent variable with the dependent variable. Learning motivation has great value weight namely beta value .440 compared to proactive personality only has value of .148 and shown not significant on the career development factor. Result of the multiple regression test show that both of independent variable is significant with F-value as much as 49.57 and as much as 31.2% variation measured as value influence. It proven that proactive personality and learning motivation are able to influence the career development in military organization as well as replying the objectives and the issues of this study. However Armed Forces must have more laborious planning to wide the scope of learning motivation among officers for the success in their career. 2009 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/1692/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/1692/1/AMINULLAH_BIN_HAJI_OMAR.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/1692/2/1.AMINULLAH_BIN_HAJI_OMAR.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Atzori,M, Lombardi, L, Fraccaroli,F, Battistelli,A, & Zaniboni, S. (2008).Organizational socialization of women in the Italian Army :Learning processes and proactive tactics, Journal of Workplace Learning. Vol. 20 No. 5, pp. 327-347.Anderson ,G. (1994). A Proactive Model for Training Needs Analysis,Journal of European Industrial Training, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 23-28,Appelbraum S.H. & Santiago. V. (1997). Career development in the plataeued organization, Career Development International Vol 2/1 pp 11-20 Bateman, T. S., & Crant, J. M. (1993). The proactive component of organizational behavior: A measure and correlates. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 103-118.Barnett, B.R & Bradley,L. (2007). The impact of organisational support for career development on career satisfaction. Career Development International Vol. 12 No. 7, pp. 617-636,Baugh, S.G., & Sullivan,S.E. (2005). Mentoring and career development, Career Development International, Vol. 10 No. 6/7, pp. 425-428 Chen,T.Y., Chang,P.L., & Yeh,C.W. (2004). A study of career needs,career development programs, job satisfaction and the turnover intentions of R&D personnel, Career Development International Vol. 9 No. 4, pp. 424-437, Cheng, W.L, E & Ho, C.K, D (2001). The influence of job and career attitudes on learning motivation and transfer, Career Development International, 6/1 [2001] 20±27 Chiaburu,D.S., Baker, V.L., & Pitariu, (2006). Beyond being proactive:what (else) matters for career self-management behaviors?, Career Development International Vol. 11 No. 7, pp. 619-632 Grant,A.M*, Ashford,S.J. (2008). The dynamics of proactivity at work,Research in Organizational Behavior , 28, pp. 3–34.Greller, M, (2006). Hours invested in profesional development during late career as a function of career motivation and satisfaction, Career Development International, Vol. 11 No. 6, pp. 544-55984 Grzeda, M.M. (1999). Re-conceptualizing career change: a career development perspective, Career Development International 4/6305±311 Gutknecht,S.P., (2003). Personality as predictor of job attitudes and intention to quit, 45th Annual Conference of the International Military Testing Association Pensacola.Jill, k. (2006). Closing the gap: impact of student proactivity and learning goal orientation on e-learning outcomes.International Journal on E- learning Judge,T.A, & Kammeyer-Mueller,J.D. (2007) Personality and Career Success, Career Development International Kirk, J.J, Downey,B., Duckett,S., & Woody,C. (2000). Name your career Development intervention, Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol12.No 5.pp. 205±216,Kim, Y.L., & Brunner,C.C. (2009). School administrators’ career mobility to the superintendency: Gender differences in career development, Journal of Educational Administration Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 75-107,Lau, V.P, & Shaffer,M.A. (1999). Career success: the effects of personality Career, Development International, 4/4 225±230.Major,D.A, Turner,J.E & Fletcher,T.D. (2006), , Linking Proactive Personality and the Big Five to Motivation to Learn and Development Activity. Journal of Applied Psychology , Vol 91, No.4, 927–935 Maria C. Osteraker, M, C, (1999). Measuring motivation in a learning, Organization Journal of Workplace Learning, Vol 11 · Number 2 ·pp. 73–77 Mullins, J.W., & Cummings, L.L. (1999), Situational strength : A framework for understanding the role of individuals in initiating proactive strategic change, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 12 No. 6, pp. 462-479.Parker,S.K, Williams,H.M, & Turner,N. (2006), Modeling the Antecedents of Proactive Behavior at Work, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 91, No. 3, 636–65285 Ruiz-Quintanilla,S.A & Claes,R. (1995).The Impact of Early Career Experiences on Youth’s Proactive Work Socialization Behavior,CAHRS Working Paper Series, , Working Paper 9 5 – 1 6.Sargeant,M, (2003). Mandatory retirement age and age discrimination,Employee Relations, Vol. 26 No. 2, 2004 pp. 151-166 Seibert, S. E., Crant, J. M., & Kraimer, M. L. (1999). Proactive personality and career success. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 416–427.Schultze,G, & Miller,C. (2004). The search for meaning and career development, Career Development International Vol. 9 No. 2, pp.142-152 Tams,S. (2008). Self-directed social learning: the role of individual differences. Journal of Management Development, Vol. 27 No. 2,pp. 196-213,Templer, A.J., & Cawsey,T.F. (1999). Rethinking career development in an era of portfolio careers, Career Development International, 4/2 70–76. Parker, A.L., Mohr, P.B., & Wilson,C. (2004). Attitudinal and personality predictors of diversionary behavior by police, Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 9-21 |