The Analysis of Fiscal Adjustment Impact on Income Distribution and Poverty in Indonesia: Computable General Equilibrium Approach

The Analysis of Fiscal Adjustment Impact on Income Distribution and Poverty in Indonesia: Computable General Equilibrium Approach

The general objective of this study is to analyze the fiscal policy of government expenditure on the Indonesian economic performance. Specifically, this study attempts to analyze the effects of (1) the contraction and expansion of the fiscal policy on the change in economic indicators, (2) the polic...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maipita, Indra
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2011
Subjects:
HC Economic History and Conditions
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/2813/1/Indra_Maipita.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/2813/2/1.Indra_Maipita.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.2813
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Jantan, Mohd Dan
Abdul Razak, Nor Azam
topic HC Economic History and Conditions
spellingShingle HC Economic History and Conditions
Maipita, Indra
The Analysis of Fiscal Adjustment Impact on Income Distribution and Poverty in Indonesia: Computable General Equilibrium Approach
description The general objective of this study is to analyze the fiscal policy of government expenditure on the Indonesian economic performance. Specifically, this study attempts to analyze the effects of (1) the contraction and expansion of the fiscal policy on the change in economic indicators, (2) the policy to reduce subsidy on fuel accompanied by giving compensation to poor household in the form of direct cash aid, (3) the policy of diverting fuel subsidy to food crops in agricultural sector on poverty level and income distribution, and (4) the policy of diverting fuel subsidy to other crops in an agricultural sector on poverty level and income distribution. The Indonesian government has implemented various policies to promote growth and at the same time to reduce the poverty level. However, there is a problem of budget deficit as a result of a big expenditure on subsidy. Thus, the government has tried to reduce fuel subsidy as it is a well known fact that fuel subsidy is less effective to alleviate poverty because the non-poor group receives more benefits of the subsidy compared to those of the poor. However, a fuel subsidy reduction has a negative effect on the poor. Therefore, the government implemented a compensation plan in the form of direct cash aid to the poor. Thus, this study attempts to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of this policy. This study also to analyze the alternative policies of the direct cash aid such as diverting fuel subsidy to the food crops and other crops in the agricultural sector. To achieve the above mentioned objectives, this study employed the Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model, Foster-Greer-Thorbecke (FGT) Index, and beta density distribution function. It was found that the policy of giving direct cash aid to the poor as a result of a reduction in fuel subsidy has a negative impact on macro economics performance and an increase in poverty level, income disparity, and depth of poverty. Thus, the policy of diverting fuel subsidy to the food crops and other crops in the agricultural sector is an alternative policy to reduce the level of poverty and the disparity in income.
format Thesis
qualification_name Ph.D.
qualification_level Doctorate
author Maipita, Indra
author_facet Maipita, Indra
author_sort Maipita, Indra
title The Analysis of Fiscal Adjustment Impact on Income Distribution and Poverty in Indonesia: Computable General Equilibrium Approach
title_short The Analysis of Fiscal Adjustment Impact on Income Distribution and Poverty in Indonesia: Computable General Equilibrium Approach
title_full The Analysis of Fiscal Adjustment Impact on Income Distribution and Poverty in Indonesia: Computable General Equilibrium Approach
title_fullStr The Analysis of Fiscal Adjustment Impact on Income Distribution and Poverty in Indonesia: Computable General Equilibrium Approach
title_full_unstemmed The Analysis of Fiscal Adjustment Impact on Income Distribution and Poverty in Indonesia: Computable General Equilibrium Approach
title_sort analysis of fiscal adjustment impact on income distribution and poverty in indonesia: computable general equilibrium approach
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
publishDate 2011
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/2813/1/Indra_Maipita.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/2813/2/1.Indra_Maipita.pdf
_version_ 1747827435742691328
spelling my-uum-etd.28132022-09-25T00:28:46Z The Analysis of Fiscal Adjustment Impact on Income Distribution and Poverty in Indonesia: Computable General Equilibrium Approach 2011-04 Maipita, Indra Jantan, Mohd Dan Abdul Razak, Nor Azam Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Sciences HC Economic History and Conditions The general objective of this study is to analyze the fiscal policy of government expenditure on the Indonesian economic performance. Specifically, this study attempts to analyze the effects of (1) the contraction and expansion of the fiscal policy on the change in economic indicators, (2) the policy to reduce subsidy on fuel accompanied by giving compensation to poor household in the form of direct cash aid, (3) the policy of diverting fuel subsidy to food crops in agricultural sector on poverty level and income distribution, and (4) the policy of diverting fuel subsidy to other crops in an agricultural sector on poverty level and income distribution. The Indonesian government has implemented various policies to promote growth and at the same time to reduce the poverty level. However, there is a problem of budget deficit as a result of a big expenditure on subsidy. Thus, the government has tried to reduce fuel subsidy as it is a well known fact that fuel subsidy is less effective to alleviate poverty because the non-poor group receives more benefits of the subsidy compared to those of the poor. However, a fuel subsidy reduction has a negative effect on the poor. Therefore, the government implemented a compensation plan in the form of direct cash aid to the poor. Thus, this study attempts to analyze the advantages and disadvantages of this policy. This study also to analyze the alternative policies of the direct cash aid such as diverting fuel subsidy to the food crops and other crops in the agricultural sector. To achieve the above mentioned objectives, this study employed the Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) model, Foster-Greer-Thorbecke (FGT) Index, and beta density distribution function. It was found that the policy of giving direct cash aid to the poor as a result of a reduction in fuel subsidy has a negative impact on macro economics performance and an increase in poverty level, income disparity, and depth of poverty. Thus, the policy of diverting fuel subsidy to the food crops and other crops in the agricultural sector is an alternative policy to reduce the level of poverty and the disparity in income. 2011-04 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/2813/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/2813/1/Indra_Maipita.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/2813/2/1.Indra_Maipita.pdf text eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Abimanyu, A. (2000). Impact of Agriculture Trade and Subsidy Policy on the Macroeconomy, Distribution, and Environment in Indonesia: A Strategy for Future Industrial Development. The Developing Economies, 38(4), 547-571. Angenor, P. R,. Chen, D. H. C. & Grimm M. (2003). Linking Representative Household Models with Household Surveys for Poverty Analysis: A Comparison of Alternative Methodologies. The Word Bank and Department of Economics, Yale University, New Haven. Annabi, N., Fatou C., Cockburn, J., & Decaluwe, B. (2005), Trade Liberalisation, Growth and Poverty in Senegal: A Dynamic Microsimulation CGE Model Analysis. Working Paper Center D’Etudes Prospectives et D’Informations International. No.2005-7 May. Antaranews. (2010). Hatta: Separuh Subsidi Listrik Dinikmati Si Mampu. Anaranews 7 April 2010. Retrieved from http://www.antara.co.id. on April, 13 2010. Arifin, B. (2006). Refleksi Strategi Pengentasan Kemiskinan: Bisnis & Ekonomi Politik, 7(4), 1-7. Armington, P. S. (1969). A Theory of Demand for Products: Distinguished by Place of Production. IMF Staff Paper, 16, 159-176. Arndt, C., Jensen, H. T. & Tarp, F. (1998). Structural Characteristics of the Economy of Mozambique: SAM Based Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.econ.ku.dk/ derg/papers/article.pdf. On December 6, 2008. Arndt, H. W. (1987). Pembangunan Ekonomi. Studi Tentang Sejarah Pemikiran. Jakarta: Lembaga Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerangan Ekonomi dan Sosial. Asra, A. (2000). Poverty and Inequality in Indonesia: Estimates, Decomposition, and Key Issues. Journal of the Asia Pasific Economy, 5(1/2), 91-111. Atkinson, A. B., & Stiglizt, J. E. (1976). The Structure of Indirect Taxation and Economic efficiency. Journal of Public economics, 1, 97-119. Azis, I. & Thorbecke, E. (2001). Modelling the socio-economic impact of the financial crisis: The case of Indonesia. Mimeo: Cornell University. Azwardi. (2006). Dampak Desentralisasi Fiskal Terhadap Kinerja Perekonomian Antar Wilayah di Indonesia. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Bandung: Universitas Padjajaran. Bappenas. 1997. Pembangunan Dalam Angka. Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Nasional Republik Indonesia, Jakarta. 225 Barro, R. J. (1997). Determinant of Economic Growth: Across-Country Empirical Study. The MIT Press, Cambridge Mass. Basri, F. (2002). Perekonomian Indonesia: Tantangan dan Harapan Bagi Kebangkitan Ekonomi Indonesia. Jakarta: Erlangga. Bautista, R. M. (2000). Agriculture-Based Development: A SAM Perspective on Central Vietnam. The Developing Economies, 34(1), 112–32. Bautista, R., Robinson, S., & Said, M. (1999). Alternative Industrial Development Paths for Indonesia: SAM and CGE Analysis. Washington, D.C: International Food Policy Institute. Berck, P., Golan, E., & Smith, B. (1997). State tax policy, labor, and tax revenue feedback effects. Industrial Relation, 36(4), 339–418. Bidani, B., & Ravillion, M. (1993). A Regional Poverty Profile for Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 29(3), 37-68. Bigsten, Arne dan Levin, Jorgen. (2000). Growth, Income Distribution, and Poverty: A Review. Goteborg University Working Paper in Economics, No. 32. BKFDK-RI (Badan Kebijakan Fiskal Departemen Keuangan Republik Indonesia). (2008). Pengembangan Model Computable General Equilibrium: Modul Pelatihan Tahap I, Center for Eonomics and Development Studies (CEDS). Bandung: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Padjadjaran. BKFDK-RI (Badan Kebijakan Fiskal Departemen Keuangan Republik Indonesia). (2008a). Applied General Equilibrium Model for Fiscal Policy (AGEFIS): Modul Pengembangan Kapasitas Model CGE Tahap II, Center for Eonomics and Development Studies (CEDS). Bandung: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Padjadjaran. BKFDK-RI (Badan Kebijakan Fiskal Departemen Keuangan Republik Indonesia). (2010). I-Account Anggaran dan Pendapatan Belajna Negara Tahun 2010. Retrieved from http://www.fiscal.depkeu.go.id on April 20, 2010. Blackwood, D. L., & Lynch, R. G. (1994). The Measurement of Inequality and Poverty: A Policy maker’s Guide to Literature. World Development, 22(4), 567-578. BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik). (2007). Berita Resmi Statistik No. 10/02/Th. X, 16 Februari 2007, Badan Pusat Statistik. BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik). (2008). Berita Resmi Statistik No. 37/07/Th. XI, 1 Juli 2008, Badan Pusat Statistik. BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik). (2008). Berita Resmi Statistik No. 37/07/Th. XI, 1 Juli 2008, Badan Pusat Statistik. BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik). (2009). Berita Resmi Statistik No. 43/07/Th. XII, 1 Juli 2009, Badan Pusat Statistik. BPS (Badan Pusat Statistik). (2010). Berita Resmi Statistik No. 12/02/Th. XIII, 10 Februari 2010, Badan Pusat Statistik. 226 Calderon, C. & Serven, L. (2004). The Effect of Infrastructure Development on Growth and Income Distibution. Retrieved from http://www.bcentral.cl.eng/stdpub/studies/workingpaper/htm/270.htm on October 10, 2008. Chenery, H., Ahluwalia, Bell, Duloy, and Jolly. (1974). Redistribution with Growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Cockburn, J. (2001). Trade Liberalization and Poverty in epal: A Computable General Equilibrium Micro Simulation Analysis. Centre for the Study of African Economies and uffield College (Oxford University) and CREFA. Canada: Universite Laval Quebec. Cornwall, Richard, R. (1984). Introduction to the Use of General Equilibrium. Advanced Textbooks In Economic. Netherlands: Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. Cororaton, C. B., & Cockburn, J. (2004). Trade Reform and Poverty in the Philippines: A Computable General equilibrium Micro simulation Analysis. International Development Research Centre, IDRC. Philippine: Philippine Institute for Development Studies. Damuri, R. YO., & Perdana, A. A. (2003). The Impact of Fiscal Policy on Income distribution and Poverty: A Computable General Equilibrium Approach for Indonesia. Economic Working Paper Series. Jakarta: Centre for Strategic and International Studies. Daoed, I. T. (1995). Efisiensi Relatif dan Distribusi Pendapatan Petani Padi Berdasarkan Sistem Penguasaan Lahan Usaha Tani di Daerah Istimewa Aceh. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada. Darsono. (2008). Analisis Keefektifan Kebijakan Fiskal Terhadap Kinerja Sektor Pertanian Dengan Penekanan Pada Agroindustri di Indonesia. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Bogor: Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian. Daryanto, A. (2001). Peranan Sektor Pertanian dalam Pemulihan Ekonomi. Jurnal Agrimedia, 6(3), 42-46. De Melo, Luiz. (1999) Fiscal Federalism and Goverment Size in Transition Economies: Te Case of Moldova. IMF Working Paper. Decaluwé, B., Patry, A., & Savard, L. (1998). Income Distribution, Poverty Measures and Trade Shocks: A Computable General Equilibrium Model of a Archetype Developing Country. Department d’économique. Université Laval. Decaluwé, B., Patry, A., Savard, L., & Thorbecke, E. (1999). Poverty Analysis Within a General Equilibrium Framework. Working Paper, 99-06, CREFA, Université Laval Decaluwé, B., Dumont, J. C., & Savard L. (1999). Measuring Poverty and Inequality in a Computable General Equilibrium Model, Working paper 99- 20, CREFA, Université Laval. 227 Deininger, K., & Squire, L. (1998). New way of Looking at Old Issues: Asset Inequality and Growth. Journal of Development Economic, 57(2), 259-287. DEPKEU-RI (Departemen Keuangan RI). (2006). Indikator Ekonomi Bulanan, Edisi September 2006. DEPKEU-RI (Departemen Keuangan RI). (2009). Kerangka Ekonomi Makro dan Pokok-Pokok Kebijakan Fiskal Tahun 2010. Paparan Menteri Keuangan pada Rapat Kerja Panitia Anggaran DPR RI 1 Juni 2009. DEPKEU-RI (Departemen Keuangan RI). (2010). I-Account Anggaran dan Pendapatan Belanja egara. Retrieved from: http://www.fiskal.depkeu.go.id/webbkf/apbn/default.asp?x=IAccLap0, on April 21, 2010 Depsos (Departemen Keuangan RI). (2009). Kerangka Ekonomi Makro dan Pokok-Pokok Kebijakan Fiskal Tahun 2010. Paparan Menteri Keuangan pada Rapat Kerja Panitia Anggaran DPR RI 1 Juni 2009. Dermoredjo, S. K., (2003). Analisis Kebijakan Hubungan Antarsektor Perekonomian Nasional. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian, Pusat Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Bogor. 1(4), 345-362. Dervis, K., Melo, J. DE, & Robinson S. (1982). General Equilibrium Models for Development Policy. London: Cambridge University Press. Dervis, Kemal, Sherman, Robinson, & Melo, J. DE. (1989). General Equilibrium Models For Development Policy. Washington D.C: A World Bank Research Publication. Devarajan, R., Lewis, J. D., & Robinson, S. (1994). Getting the Model Right: The General Equilibrium Approach to Adjusment Policy. Draft Manuscript. Dinwiddy, C. L., & Teal, F. J. (1988). The Two-Sector General Equilibrium Model: A New Approach. New York: ST. Martin Press, Inc. Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2003). Keputusan Direktorat Jenderal Pajak Nomor: KEP-34/PJ/2003. Dixon, P. B., Parameter, R., Powell, A.A., & Wilcoxen, P. J. (1992). otes and Problems in Applied General Equilibrium Economics. Amsterdam: North – Holland. Djojohadikusumo, S. (1994). Perkembangan Pemikiran Ekonomi. Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia. Fane, G., & War, P. (2002). How Economic Growth Reduces Poverty: A General Equilibrium Analysis for Indonesia. Discussion paper No.453, Research Department. Washington, D.C: Inter American Development bank. Fofana, I., André, L., & Cockburn, J. (2002). Balancing Social Accounting Matrix. Centre de Recherche en Économie et Finaces Appliquée (CREFA). Université Laval. Foster, J., Greer, J., & Thorbecke, E. (1984). A Class of Decomposable Poverty Measures. Econometrica, 52(3), 761-766. 228 Friedman, J. (2002). How responsive is Poverty to Growth?: A Regional Analysis of Poverty, Inequality, and Growth in Indonesia, 1984-1999. Retrieved from www.ciaonet.org/wps/frj02/ on January 19, 2009. Gemmell, N. (1994). Ilmu Ekonomi Pembangunan. Pustaka LP3ES, Jakarta. Gillis, M., Perkins, D. H., Romer, M., & Snodgrass, D. R. (1987). Economic of Development. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Hafizrianda, Y. (2007). Dampak Pembangunan Sektor Pertanian Terhadap Distribusi Pendapatan dan Perekonomian Regional Provinsi Papua: Suatu Analisis Model Sistem eraca Sosial Ekonomi. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Bogor: Program Pascasarjana, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Handoko, R., & Patriadi, P. (2005). Evaluasi Kebijakan Subsidi NonBBM. Kajian Ekonomi dan Keuangan. 9(4). Hatta (2010). Separuh Subsidi Listrik Dinikmati Si Mampu. Antaranews. Retrieved from http://www.antara.co.id on April 13, 2010. Henderson, J. M., & Quandt, R. E. (1980). Microeconomic Theory A Mathematical Approach. Singapore: Mc Graw-Hill book Company. Horison, W. J. (1997). Computable General equilibrium Models. Retrieved from http://www.mobidik.dk/mobi.cge.htm on October 12, 2008. Husain, A., & Chowdhury, A. (2001). Open-Economy Macroeconomics for Developing Countries. Northampton: Edwar Elger, Cheltenham. Hutahean, P., Purwiyanto, Hadiyanto, A., Askolani, & Rahayu, S.L. (2002). Bunga Rampai Kebijakan Fiskal. Jakarta: Badan Analisis Fiskal Departemen Keuangan RI. James, S., & Nobes, C. (1992). The Economics of Taxation. United Kingdom: Prentice Hall International. Kakwani, N. (1993). Poverty and economic Growth with Application to Cote D’Ivore. Review of Income and Wealth Series, 39(2). Kakwani, N. (2000). Growth and poverty Reduction: An Empirical Analysis. Asian Development Review, 18(2), 75-84. Kakwani, N. C. (1999). Inequality, welfare and poverty: three interrelated phenomena. In Silber, J. (ed.) “Handbook of Income Inequality Measurement”. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. Kakwani, N. C. (2004). Methods in measuring poverty matter: an Indian story.OnePager umber 2, Brasil: International Poverty Center. Kakwani, N. C., Khandker, S., & Son, H. H. (2004). Pro-poor growth: concepts and measurement with country case studies. Working Paper umber 2004- 1, Brasil: International Poverty Center. Kakwani, N.C., & Pernia, E. M. (2000). What is pro-poor growth?. Asian Development Review, 18, 1-16. Kasliwal, P. (1995). Development Economics. Ohio: South-Western College Publishing. 229 Koutsoyiannis, A. (1989). Microeconomic Theory Basic Principle and Extensions. 4th Ed. The Dryden Press. Kuznets, S. (1956-1967). Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations. Economic Development and Cultural Change (a series of 10 articles). Kuznets, S. (1959). “On Comparative Study of Economic Structure and Growth of ations.” The Comparative Study of Economic Growth and Structure. New York: National Bureau of Economic Research. Kuznets, S. (1961). Quantitative Aspects of the Economic Growth of Nations: IV. Long Term Trends in Capital Formation Proportions. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 9, 1-124. Kuznets, S. (1966). Modern Economic Growth. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. Kuznets, S. (1973). Modern Economic Growth: Findings and Reflections. American Economic Review, 63, 247-258. Leontief, W. (1986). Input-Output Economics. New York: Oxford University Press. Lewis, A. (1961). Is Economic Growth Desirable: The Theory of Economic Growth. George Allen & Unwin Ltd., London. Lewis, Arthur. (1954). Economic Development with Unlimited Supplies of Labor. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 22: 139-191. Lewis, J. D. (1991). A Computable General Equilibrium (CGE) Model of Indonesia. Development. Discussion Paper No. 378. Harvard Institute for International Development. Harvard University. Lofgren, H. (1999). Trade Reform and the Poor in Marocco: A Rural-Urban General Equilibrium Analysis of Reduced Protection. Trade and Macroeconomics Division. Washington D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute. Lofgren, H. (2001). External Shocks and Domestic Poverty Alleviation: Simulation with a CGE Model of Malawi. TMD Discussion Paper No. 71. Trade and Macroeconomics Division. Washington. D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute. Lofgren, H. (2003). Exercises in General Equilibrium Modeling Using GAMS (and Key to Exercises in CGE Modeling Using GAMS). Washington D.C.: International Food Policy Research Institute. Lofgren, H., Harris, R. B., Robinson, S., Thomas M., & El-Said M. (2002). A Standard Computable General Equilibrium Model in GAMS. Microcomputers in Policy Research. Washington D. C., USA: International Food Policy Research Institute. Lofgren, H., Lee H. RE., Robinson, & Sherman. (2002). A Standard Computable General Equilibrium Model in GAMS, With assistance from Marcelle 230 Thomas and Moataz El-Said. International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Maipita, I. (2009). Model Kebijakan Fiskal dan Dampaknya Terhadap Penurunan Kemiskinan di Indonesia. Riset Unggulan Strategis Nasional, DIKTI. Mangkoesoebroto, G. (1997). Ekonomi Publik. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gadjahmada. Mankiw, N.G. (2003). Macroeconomics. New York: Worth Publisher. Michael W. D., Colell, A. MA. & Green J. R. (1995). Microeconomic Theory. New York: Oxford University Press. Miller, R. E. & Blair, P. D. (1985). Input-Output Analysis: foundations and Extensions. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Miller, Roy, R. LE., & Meiner, R. E. (1994). Teori Ekonomi Mikro Intermediate. Edisi ke Tiga, Terjemahan Haris Munandar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo. Ministry of Social Affair, Departemen Sosial RI. (2008). Petunjuk Teknis Penyaluran Bantuan Langsung Tunai Untuk Rumahtangga Sasaran. Mirrlees, J. A. (1976). An Exploration in the Theory of Optimum Income Taxation. Review of economic Studies, 38,175-208. Musgrave, R. A., & Musgrave P. B. (1993). Keuangan egara dalam Teori dan Praktek. Jakarta: Erlangga. Myles, G.D. (1997). Public Economics. Cambridge: University Press Cambridge. Nanga, M. (2006). Dampak Transfer Fiskal Terhadap Kemiskinan di Indonesia: Suatu Analisis Simulasi Kebijakan. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Bogor: Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor. Nicholson, Walter. (2005). Microeconomic: Basic Principles and Extensions. USA: Thomson Learning. NKAPBN-RI. (2009). ota Keuangan dan Anggaran Pendapatan dan Belanja egara Tahun Anggaran 2010. Norton, R.D. (2004). Agricultural Development Policy: Concept and Experiences. Food and Agricultural Organization and John willey and sons Ltd. West Sussex. Oktaviany, R. (2001). Implication of APEC Trade Liberalization and Other Changes: for the Indonesia Economy. Quarterly Review of the Indonesia economy. Bisnis & Ekonomi Politik, 4(1), 2-43. Oktaviany, R., & Sahara. (2005). Dampak Kenaikan Harga BBM Terhadap Kinerja Ekonomi Makro, Keragaan Ekonomi Sektoral dan Rumahtangga di Indonesia: Suatu pendekatan Model Ekonomi Keseimbangan Umum. Jurnal Manajemen dan Agribisnis. 2(1). Oktaviany, R., Puspitawati, E., & Sahara. (2005). Dampak Kebijakan Pemerintah: Pada Sektor Pendidikan Terhadap Ekonomi Indonesia dan Distribusi Pendapatan. Jurnal Bisnis Ekonomi Politik, 1(4), 56 -83. 231 Oktaviany, R., Sahara, & Puspitawati, E. (2006). The Impact of Increasing Skilled: Labor Supply on Indonesia Economy and Income Distribution. Indonesian economic Journal, 1(6), 61-87. Paula, D. L., Siegel, P., & Pompeli, G. (1999). Economic Growth with Endogenous: Human Capital and Income Equality. Agricultural experiment Station. Institute of Agricultural, University of Tennessee. Perkins, D. H., Snodgrass, D. R., Gillis, M., & Roemer, M. (2001). Economics of Development. Third Edition. New York: W.W. Norton and Company. Raharja, P. & Manurung, M. (1999). Teori Ekonomi Mikro Suatu Pengantar. Jakarta: Lembaga Penerbit FE UI. Ratnawaty, A. (1996). Dampak Kebijakan Tarif Impor dan Pajak Ekspor Terhadap Kinerja Perekonomian Sektor Pertanian dan DistribusiPendapatan di Indonesia: Suatu Pendekatan Model Keseimbangan Umum. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Yogjakarta: Universitas Gadjah Mada. Ravallion, M. & Bidani, B. (1994). How Robust Is a Poverty Profile?. World Bank Economic Review, 8, 75-102. Ravallion, M. & Datt, G. (1999) When is Growth Pro-Poor? Evidence from the Diverse Experiences of India’s States. World Bank. Ravallion, M. (1998). Inpres and Inequality: A Distributional Perspective on the Centre’s Regional Disbursement. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 24(3), 53-71. Robinson, S. (1991). Macroeconomics, Financial Variables, and Computable General Equilibrium Models. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California at Barkeley. Robinson, S., & El-Said, M. (2000). Upadating and Estimating a Social Accounting Matrix Using Cross Entropy Methods. TMD Discussion Paper No. 58, International Food Policy Research Institute. Robinson, S., Cattaneo, A., & El-Said, M. (1998). Estimating a Social Accounting Matrix Using Cross Entropy Methods. TMD Discussion Paper No. 33, International Food Policy Research Institute. Romer, D. (2001). Advanced Macroeconomics. Second Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co. Ros, M. T. (2005). Documentation of Applied Dynamic Analysis of the Global Economy (ADAGE) Model. Working Paper Research Triangle Institute. Sadoulet, E., & Janvry, A. DE. (1995). Quantitative Development Analysis. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Samosir, A. P. (2001). Studi Dampak Penghapusan Subsidi Listrik Terhadap Kinerja Sektor Riil Studi Kasus: Industri Tekstil/Garment. Badan kebijakan Fiskal Departemen Keuangan RI. Savard, L. (2003). Poverty and Income distribution In a CGE-Household Sequential Model. Senegal: IDRC-Dakar. 232 Simatupang, P., & Dermoredjo, S. (2003). Produk Domestik Regional Bruto, Harga dan Kemiskinan: Hipotesis “Trickle Down” Dikaji Ulang. Ekonomi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 51(3), 291-324. Simatupang, P., et al. (2000). Kelayakan Pertanian Sebagai Sektor Andalan Pembangunan Ekonomi asional. Bogor: PPSEP Balitbang Departemen Pertanian. Sitepu, R. K. (2007). Dampak Investasi Sumberdaya Manusia dan Transfer Pendapatan Terhadap Distribusi Pendapatan dan Kemiskinan di Indonesia. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Bogor: Program Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor. Soediyono. (1985). Ekonomi Makro: Analisis IS-LM dan Permintan Agregatif. Yokyakarta: Liberty. Spencer, M. H., & Amos, O. M. Jr. (1993). Contemporary Economics. New York: Worth Publishers. Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Economic of the Public Sector. New York: W.W. Norton and Company. Stringer, R. (2001). How important are the Non-traditional Economic Roles of Agriculture in Development. Centre for International Economic Studies, Discussion Paper No. 0118, Adelaide University, Adelaide. Suharyanto, S., & Rubiyo. (2004). Analisis Pendapatan dan Distibusi Pendapatan Usaha Tani Tanaman Perkebunan Berbasis Kelapa di Kabupaten Tabanan. Jurnal Pengkajian dan Pengembangan Teknologi Pertanian, 7(2), 146-154. Sukirno, S. (2005). Makroekonomi Modern: Perkembangan Pemikiran Dari Klasik Hingga Keynesian Baru. Jakarta: Rajawali Press. Suparmoko. M. (2003). Keuangan egara dalam Teori dan Praktik. Yogyakarta: BPFE. Suryanto, Y. (2010). Subsidi Listrik di Indonesia. Retrieved from http://umum.kompasiana.com on February 13, 2010. Susanto, H. (1997). Tinjauan Teoritis Atas Eksternalitas dan Beberapa Kasus di Indonesia. Jakarta: Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Indonesia. Suselo, Sri Liani., & Tarsidin (2008). Kemiskinan di Indonesia: Pengaruh Pertumbuhan dan Perubahan Struktur Ekonomi. Buletin Ekonomi Moneter dan Perbankan Bank Indonesia, 11(2), 155-194. Susilowati, S. Su., Sinaga, B. M., Libong, W. H., & Erwidodo. (2007). Dampak Kebijakan Ekonomi di Sektor Agroindustri Terhadap Kemiskinan dan Distribusi Pendapatan Rumahtangga di Indonesia: Analisis Simulasi Dengan Sistem Neraca Sosial Ekonomi. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi, 25(1), 11- 36. Sutomo, S. (1991). Matrik Pengganda (Multiplier Matix) Dalam Kerangka Sistim Neraca Sosial Ekonomi. Ekonomi dan Keuangan Indonesia, 39(1), 19-38. Suyono, P. (2007). Tinjauan Tentang Fungsi Ekonomi Pemerintah. Retrieved from http://www.pu.go.id/itjen/buletin/2324fung.htm on February 16, 2008. 233 Szeto, K. LE. (2002). A Dynamic Computable General Equilibrium (CGE): Model of The ew Zeland Economy. New Zealand: New Zeland Treasury Working Paper. Tambunan, T. (2006). Perekonomian Indonesia Sejak Orde Lama Hingga Pasca Krisis. Jakarta: Pustaka Kuantum. Tambunan, T. TH. (2001). Transformasi Ekonomi di Indonesia: Teori & Penemuan Empiris. Jakarta: Salemba Empat. Tambunan, T. TH. (2006). Keadilan Dalam Ekonomi. Kadin-JETRO. Retrieved from http:\\www.kadin-indonesia.or.id on March 15, 2008. The Bureau of Research IPB (Lembaga Penelitian IPB). (2002). Studi Perumusan Structural Adjustment Program dan Model Pembangunan Pertanian di Indonesia. Bogor: Lembaga Penelitian, Institut Pertanian Bogor. Thorbecke, E. (1989). “The Social Accounting Matrix: Framework to Capture the Interdependence between Domestic and Foreign Variables,” paper prepared for the conference on Large-scale Social Science Models, ational Center for Super Computing Applications. University of Illinois. Thorbecke, E. (1992). Adjustment and Equity in Indonesia. Paris: OECD Development Center. Thorbecke, E. (2000). The Use Social Accounting Matrices in Modeling, Paper Prepared for the 26th General Conference of The International Association for Research in Income and Wealth Cracow. Poland. Thorbecke, E. (2001). Poverty analysis and measurement within a general equilibrium framework. Paper presented at the Asian and Pacific Forum on Poverty. Manila. Todaro, M. P. (2000). Economic Development. London: Pearson Education Limited. Todaro, M. P., & Smith, S. C. (2003). Economic Development. London: Pearson Education Limited. Townsend, R. F., & McDonald, S. (1997). Biased Policies, Agriculture and Income Distribution in South Africa: A Social Accounting Matrix Approach. Cape Town: Paper prepared for the ESRC Development Economics Study Group Conference on the Role of the Public Sector, Tresch, R. W. (2002). Public Finance – A ormative View. Academic Press. Turnovsky, S. J. (1981). Macroeconomic Analysis and Stabilization Policy. Cambridge: University Press Cambridge. Usman, Syaiku. (2008). The Mecanism and Uses the Specific Allocation Fund (DAK). ewsletter The SMERUResearch Institute. Number 25: Jan- Aprl/2008. Varian, H. R. (1992). Microeconomic Analysis. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. 234 Varian, H. R. (1999). Intermediate Microeconomics A Modern Approach. New York: W.W. Norton & Company. Wangke, F. (2002). Peranan Sektor Publik Dalam Pemulihan Perekonomian Daerah Pada Era Otonomi: Suatu Pendekatan Teoritis pada Public Choice. Makalah Falsafah Sains (PPs 702) Program Pasca Sarjana/ S3 Institut Pertanian Bogor. Warr, P. G. (1998). WAYAG: An Empirically – Based Applied General Equilibrium Model For the Indonesian Economy. Canberra: Australian National University. Wittwer, G. (1999). WAYAG: A General Equilibrium Model Adapted for the Indonesian Economy. The University of Adelaide. Wobst, P. (2001). Structural Adjustment and Intersectional Shift in Tanzania: A Computable General Equilibrium Analysis. Washington D. C.: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI). Wuryanto, L. EK. (1999). Decentralization and Income Distribution in the Inter- Regional Indonesian Economy dalam Hewing, Geoffrey J.D. (penyunting). “Understanding and Interpreting Economic Structure” Selected Reading. Urban: University of Illinois. Yudhoyono, S. B. (2004). Pembangunan Pertanian dan Pedesaan Sebagai Upaya Mengatasi Kemiskinan dan Pengangguran: Analisis Ekonomi-Politik Kebijakan Fiskal. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Bogor: Sekolah Pascasarjana Institut Pertanian Bogor.

Similar Items