The Relationship Between Budget Participation, Organizational Commitment, The Use of Management Accounting System, The Use of Performance Measures Information, and Managerial Performance in Malaysian Local Authorities

This study examined the relationship between budget participation and managerial performance in Malaysian local authorities. In particular, it aims to identify the mediating effects of organizational commitment, the use of management accounting system (MAS), and the use of performance measures infor...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Badariah, Din
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2012
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/3487/1/s91704.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/3487/8/s91704.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.3487
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Tayib, Mahamad
Yatim, Bidin
topic HD58.9 Organizational Effectiveness.
JS Local government Municipal government
spellingShingle HD58.9 Organizational Effectiveness.
JS Local government Municipal government
Badariah, Din
The Relationship Between Budget Participation, Organizational Commitment, The Use of Management Accounting System, The Use of Performance Measures Information, and Managerial Performance in Malaysian Local Authorities
description This study examined the relationship between budget participation and managerial performance in Malaysian local authorities. In particular, it aims to identify the mediating effects of organizational commitment, the use of management accounting system (MAS), and the use of performance measures information. A total of 131 heads of department in Malaysian local authorities participated in the survey. A structural equation modeling was utilised to examine the direct and indirect effects of budget participation on managerial performance through path analysis. The findings from the research revealed that budget participation influences managerial performance via the mediating variables of organizational commitment, the use of MAS, and the use of performance measures information. Several limitations may be noted in this study. First, the research survey was conducted only in local authorities. Thus, the results may not be generalized to other public organizations. Secondly, this study only involved organizational commitment, the use of MAS, and the use of performance measures information to explain the relationship of budget participation on managerial performance. Thirdly, the use of respondents’ perceptions to measure the constructs is subject to the respondent bias. The theoretical contribution of this study is to extend earlier literature by addressing the relationship in which, budget participation, organization commitment, the use of MAS, and the use of the performance measures information can be interrelated in providing explanations of managerial performance. The practical contribution for this study is that its findings can have practical relevance in the current management setting in Malaysian government organization. The results from the present study also provide insights on the roles of budget participation as management mechanism by local authorities’ managers in evaluating their performance.
format Thesis
qualification_name Ph.D.
qualification_level Doctorate
author Badariah, Din
author_facet Badariah, Din
author_sort Badariah, Din
title The Relationship Between Budget Participation, Organizational Commitment, The Use of Management Accounting System, The Use of Performance Measures Information, and Managerial Performance in Malaysian Local Authorities
title_short The Relationship Between Budget Participation, Organizational Commitment, The Use of Management Accounting System, The Use of Performance Measures Information, and Managerial Performance in Malaysian Local Authorities
title_full The Relationship Between Budget Participation, Organizational Commitment, The Use of Management Accounting System, The Use of Performance Measures Information, and Managerial Performance in Malaysian Local Authorities
title_fullStr The Relationship Between Budget Participation, Organizational Commitment, The Use of Management Accounting System, The Use of Performance Measures Information, and Managerial Performance in Malaysian Local Authorities
title_full_unstemmed The Relationship Between Budget Participation, Organizational Commitment, The Use of Management Accounting System, The Use of Performance Measures Information, and Managerial Performance in Malaysian Local Authorities
title_sort relationship between budget participation, organizational commitment, the use of management accounting system, the use of performance measures information, and managerial performance in malaysian local authorities
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate 2012
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/3487/1/s91704.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/3487/8/s91704.pdf
_version_ 1747827584084738048
spelling my-uum-etd.34872016-04-18T08:29:41Z The Relationship Between Budget Participation, Organizational Commitment, The Use of Management Accounting System, The Use of Performance Measures Information, and Managerial Performance in Malaysian Local Authorities 2012-08 Badariah, Din Tayib, Mahamad Yatim, Bidin Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HD58.9 Organizational Effectiveness. JS Local government Municipal government This study examined the relationship between budget participation and managerial performance in Malaysian local authorities. In particular, it aims to identify the mediating effects of organizational commitment, the use of management accounting system (MAS), and the use of performance measures information. A total of 131 heads of department in Malaysian local authorities participated in the survey. A structural equation modeling was utilised to examine the direct and indirect effects of budget participation on managerial performance through path analysis. The findings from the research revealed that budget participation influences managerial performance via the mediating variables of organizational commitment, the use of MAS, and the use of performance measures information. Several limitations may be noted in this study. First, the research survey was conducted only in local authorities. Thus, the results may not be generalized to other public organizations. Secondly, this study only involved organizational commitment, the use of MAS, and the use of performance measures information to explain the relationship of budget participation on managerial performance. Thirdly, the use of respondents’ perceptions to measure the constructs is subject to the respondent bias. The theoretical contribution of this study is to extend earlier literature by addressing the relationship in which, budget participation, organization commitment, the use of MAS, and the use of the performance measures information can be interrelated in providing explanations of managerial performance. The practical contribution for this study is that its findings can have practical relevance in the current management setting in Malaysian government organization. The results from the present study also provide insights on the roles of budget participation as management mechanism by local authorities’ managers in evaluating their performance. 2012-08 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/3487/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/3487/1/s91704.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/3487/8/s91704.pdf text eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Article 95A, Constitution of Malaysia. Accessed on August 6, 2008. Article 95D, Constitution of Malaysia. Accessed on August 6, 2008. Article 95E, Constitution of Malaysia. Accessed on August 6, 2008. Abdul Khalid, S. N. (2008). Performance measurement and accountability system for local authorities in Malaysia: Towards a faster service delivery. Paper presented at the Ninth Annual Asian Academic Accounting Association, 43-65. Abdullah, M.C. (2008). From customer satisfaction to citizen satisfaction rethinking. Asian Social Science, 4, 87-92. Abernethy, M.A., & Bouwens, J. (2005). Determinants of accounting innovation implementation. Abacus, 41, 217-240. Abernethy, M.A., & Brownell, P. (1999). The role of budgets in organizations facing strategic change: An exploratory study. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24,189-204. Abernethy, M.A., & Guthrie, C.H. (1994). An empirical assessment of the “fit” between strategy and management information system design. Accounting & Finance, 34, 49-66. Akaike, H. (1974), A new look at the statistical model identification. Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716- 723. Ali, J.H. (2004). Management Practices in Malaysia in the New Economy. UUM Press: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Alwin, D.F., & Hauser. (1975). The decomposition of effect in path analysis. American Sociological Review, 40, 37-47. Armstrong, J. S., & Overton, T. S. (1977). Estimating nonresponse bias in mail surveys. Journal of Marketing Research, XIV, 396-402. Anderson, J.C., & Gerbing, D.W. (1988).Structural Equation Modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 411-423. Anthony, R.H., & Young, D.W. (1994). Management Control in Nonprofit Organizations. Irwin: Homewood. Arbuckle J. (2006). Amos 7.0 User’s Guide. Amos Development Corporation: Spring House, PA. Argyris, C. (1952). The Impact of Budgets on People. The Controllership Foundation. New York. Arpah. A. R. (2008). Circular by the Chief Secretary of Ministry of Housing and Local Government 1/2008. Local Government Authorities Star Rating System (SSR-PBT) Implementation. Arwidi, O. , & Samuelson, L. A. (1993).The Development of Budgetary Control in Sweden. Management Accounting Research, 4, 93–107. Arya, A., Glover, J., & Sivaramakrishnan, K. (1997). The interaction between decision and control problems and the value of information. The Accounting Review, 72, 561-574. Atkinson, A.A., Balakrishnan, R., Booth, P., Cote, J.M., Groot, T., Malmi, T., Robert, H., Uliana, E., & Wu, A. (1997) New directions in management accounting research. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 9, 79-108. Atkinson, A.A., Kaplan, R.S., & Young, S.M. (2004) Management Accounting, Fourth Edition, Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey. Audit Commission. (1986). Performance Review in Local Government–A Handbook for Auditors and Local Authorities, HMSO, London. Awio, G., & Northcott, D. (2001). Decentralization and budgeting: the Uganda health sector experience. The International Journal of Public Sector Management. 14, 75-88 Azmi, S., & Siew Lin, E. Y. (2003). Malaysia. Malaysian Institute of Economic Research. Kuala Lumpur. Baiman, S., (1982). Agency research in managerial accounting: A survey. Journal of Accounting Literature, 1, 154-213. Baiman, S., & Demski, J.S. (1980). Economically optimal performance evaluation and control systems. Joumal of Accounting Research, Supplement, 18, 184-220. Baines, A., & Langfield-Smith, K. (2003). Antecedents to management accounting change: A structural equation approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 675-698 Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 51,1173–1182 Barrett, P. (2007). Structural Equation Modelling: Adjudging model fit. Personality and Individual Differences , 42, 815-24. Bartlett, J.E., Kotrlik, J.W., & Higginss (2001). Organizational Research: Determining Appropriate Sample Size in Survey Research. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 19, 43-50. Basnan, N., Tooley, S., & Hooks, J. (2007). Perfomance reporting by Malaysian local authorities: Identifying stakeholder needs. Paper presented at the 19th Asian- Pacific Conference on International Accounting Issues. Bass, B.M., & Avolio B.J. (1990). The implications of transactional and transformational leadership for individual , team, and organizational development. Research in Organizational Change and Development, 4, 231–272. Becker, S., & Green, D. (1962). Budgeting and employee behavior. Journal of Business, 35, 392-402. Bentler, P. M., & Chow, C.P. (1987). Practical issue in structural modelling. Sociology Method and Research. 16, 78-117. Bentler, P. M., & Yuan, K.-H. (1999). Structural equation modeling with small samples: Test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 34, 181–197. Bentler, P.M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-46. Bentler, P.M., & Bonnet, D.C. (1980), Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures . Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606. Berita Harian. (2009). 97 PBT tidak ikut piawaian SIRIM. 23, Disember. Berman, E., & Wang. X. H. (2000). Performance measurement in U.S. Counties: Capacity for reform. Public Administration Review, 60, 409-420. Betts, S. C. (2003). Contingency theory: Science or technology?. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 8, 123-130. Bollen, K. A. (1990). Overall fit in covariance structure models: Two types of sample size effects. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 256-259. Bollen, K., & Long, S. (1993). Testing Structural Equation Models. Newbury Park: Sage. Boomsma, A. (2000). Reporting analyses of covariance structures. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 461-483. Brandt, T. & Lim, M. (2009). Market Watch 2009: The Environmental Sector in Malaysia. The German Chamber Network International. Kuala Lumpur. Brief, A.P., & Aldag, R. J. (1980). Antecedents of organizational commitment among hospital nurses, Sociology of Work and Occupations, 7, 210-221. Brownell, P. (1981). Participation in budgeting, locus of control and organizational effectiveness. The Accounting Review, 6, 844-860. Brownell, P. (1982a). Participation in budgeting process; When it works when it does’t. Journal of Accounting Literature, 1, 124-153. Brownell, P. (1982b). The role of accounting data in performance evaluation, budgetary participation, and task uncertainty; test of a three way interaction. Journal of Accounting Research, 24, 241-249. Brownell, P. (1983). Leadership style, budgetary participation and managerial behavior. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 8, 307-321. Brownell, P., & McInnes, M. (1986).Budgetary participation, motivation and managerial performance. The Accounting Review, 8, 587-600. Bryan, J.F., & Locke, E.A. (1967). Goal setting as a means of increasing motivation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 51, 274-277. Buchanan, B. (1974). Building organizational commitment: the socializaion of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19, 533-551. Burney, L.L., & Matherly, M. (2007). Examining performance measurement from an integrated perspective. Journal of Information System, 21, 49-68. Burns, T., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock Publications. Carlisle, H.M., (1976), Management Concepts and Situations, Science Research Associates Inc. Carter, N., Klein, R., & Day, P. (1995). How Organisations Measure Success: The Use of Performance Indicators in Government. Routledge, London. Cavalluzzo, K.S., & Ittner, C.D. (2004). Implementing performance measurement innovations: Evidence from government. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 29, 243- 267. Chakrabarti P.K., & R. Kundu, (1984). Personality profiles of management personnel, psychological studies, 29, 121-137. Chandrasekaran, V. (2003). Improve to keep up with progress , The Star. Access Online on 3 October 2010. Chapman, C.S. (1997). Reflections on a contingent view of accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22, 189- 205. Chapman, C.S. (1998).Accountants in organizational networks . Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23, 737-766. Chia, R. (1995). From modern to postmodern organizational analysis. Organization Studies, 16, 579–604. Chenhall, R.H. (2003). Management control systems design within its organizational context: Findings from Contingency-Based research and directions for the future. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 127-168. Chenhall, R.H., & Brownell, P. (1988). The effect of participative budgeting on job satisfaction and performance : Role ambiguity as an intervening variable. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 13, 225-253. Chenhall, R.H., & Morris, D. (1986). The impact of structure, enviroment, and interdependence on the perceived usefulness of management accounting system. The Accounting Review, 61, 16-35. Chenhall, R.H., & Moers, F. (2007). The issue of endogeneity within theorybased, quantitative management accounting research. European Accounting Review, 16, 173-196 Chenhall, R.H., & Langfield-Smith, K. (1998). The relationship between strategic priorities, management techniques and management accounting: an empirical investigation using a systems approach, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23, 243-264. Chong, V. K. (1996). Management accounting system, task uncertainty and managerial performance: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21, 415-421. Chong, V. K., & Chong K.M. (2002). Budget goal commitment and informational effects of budget participation on performance: A structural equation modelling approach. Behavioral Research of Accounting, 14, 65-86. Chong, V. K., & Bateman, D. (2000). The effect of role stress on budgetary participation and job satisfaction-performance linkages: A test of two different models. Advance in Accounting Behavioral Research, 3, 268-276. Chong, V. K., Eagleton, I. R. C., & Leung, M. K. C. (2002). The effect of value attainment and cognitive roles of budgetary participation on job performance. Advance in Accounting Behavioral Research, 8, 213-223. Chong, V. K., Eagleton, I. R. C., & Micheal, K. C. L. (2006). The multiple roles of participative budget on job performance. Advance in Accounting, 22, 67-95. Chong, V.K., & Johnson, D.M. (2007). Testing a model of antecedents and consequences of budgetary participation on job performance. Accounting and Business Research, 37, 3-19. Chow, C.W., Kato, Y., & Merchant, K.A. (1996). The use of organizational controls and their effect on data manipulation and management myopia: A Japan vs. USA comparison. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21, 175- 192. Chow, C.W., Kato, Y., & Shields, M.D. (1994), National culture and the preference for management controls: An exploratory study of the firmlabour market interface, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 19, 381-400. Chow, C.W., Shields, M.D., & Wu, A. (1999). The importance of national culture in the design of and preference for management controls for multinational operations. Accounting , Organizations and Society, 24, 441-461. Chow, C.W., Shields, M.D., & Chan, Y.K. (1991). The effects of management controls and national culture on manufacturing performance: An experimental investigation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 16, 209-226. Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16, 64–73. Cohen, A.(1992). Antecedents of organizational commitment across occupational groups: a meta-analysis. Journal Of Organizational Behavior, 13, 539-554. Collinge, C.J., & Noble, J. (1993). Budget Making Through Priorities. Local Government Chronicle. Commonwealth. (1995).From Problem to Solution: Commonwealth Strategies for Reform. London: Commonwealth Secretariat. Coombs, H. M., & Jerkins. D. E. (1994). Public Sector Financial Management, 2nd ed. London: Champman & Hall. Couger, J. D. (1995) Creative Problem Solving and Opportunity Finding. USA:Boyd and Fraser Publishing Company. Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficient Alpha and The Internal Structure of Tests. Pcychometrica, 2, 297-334. Curry, J.P., Wakefield, D. S., Price, J. L., & Muellar, C. W. (1986). On the causal ordering of job satisfaction and organizational commitment, The Academy of Management Journal , 29, 847-858. Das G.S, (1987). Conflict management styles of efficient branch managers: As perceived by others. ASCI Journal of Management, 17, 30-38. Dave, V. (2004). Managerial effectiveness: A function of personality type and organisational components The Free Library. (2004). Retrieved September 10, 2009 from http://www.thefreelibrary.com. Dean, P.N. (1986). Programme and performance budgeting in Malaysia. Public Administration and Development, 6, 267-286. Derfuss (2009). The relationship of budgetary participation and reliance on accounting performance measures with individual-level consequent variables: A meta-analysis. European Accounting Review, 18, 203-239. Drury, C. (2000), Management & Cost Accounting, Thomson Learning, London. Dunham, R.B., Smith, F.J., & Blackburn, R.S. (1977). Validation of the index of organizational reactions with the jdi, the msq and facet scale. Academy of Management Journal, 20, 420-432. Dunk, A. S. (1995). The effect of budget emphasis and information asymmetry on the relation between budgetary participation and slack. The Accounting Review, 68, 400-410. Eker. M. (2009). The impact of budget participation and management accounting systems on performance of Turkish middle level managers. Akdeniz I.I.B.F. Dergisi, 17, 105-126 Eker. M. (2009). The impact of budget participation on managerial performance via organizational commitment: a study on the top 500 firms in Turkey. Akdeniz i.i.b.F. Dergisi, 17, 117-136. England, G.,& Lee, R. (1974). The relationship between managerial values and managerial success in United States, Japan, India, and Australia. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2, 59-72. Epstein, P.D. (1988). Using Performance Measurement in Local Government: A Guide to Improving Decisions, Performance, and Accountability. New York: National Civic League Press. Etemadi, H., Dilami, D.H., Bazaz, M.S., & Parameswaran, R. (2009).Culture, management accounting and managerial performance: Focus Iran. Advance in Accounting, 25, 216-225. Everitt, B. S., & Dunn, G. (1983). Advanced Methods of Data Exploration and Modelling. London: Heinemann. Ezzamel, M., & Willmott, H. (1993). Corporate governance and financial accountability: Recent reforms in the UK public sector. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 6, 109-132. Faucett, A., & Kleiner, H Brian (1994). New developments in performance measurement of public programmes. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 7, 63-70. Ferris, K.R. (1977). A test of the expectancy theory of motivation in an accounting environment. The Accounting Review, 52, 605–615. Fisher, C. (1996). The impact of perceived environmental uncertainty and individual differences on management information requirements: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 21, 361-369. Fisher, J. (1995), Contingency-Based research on management control systems: Categorization by level of complexity. Journal of Accounting Literature, 14, 24-48. Fisher, J., Frederickson, J. R., & Peffer, S. A. (2000). The effect of information asymmetry of negotiated budgets: An empirical investigation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, 27-43. Fisher, J.G. (1998). Contingency theory, management control systems and firm outcomes: Past results and future directions, Behavioral Research in Accounting, Supplement, 10, 47-65. Fitzgerald, L, Johnston, R, Brignall, T.J, Silvestro, R., & Voss, C. (1991). Performance Measurement in Service Businesses, CIMA, London. Flynn, N. (1997). Public Sector Management. 3rd Ed.. Prentice Hall. Havester: Wheatsheaf, London. Franklin, A. (2002). An examination of the impact of budget reform on Arizona and Oklahoma appropriations. Public Budgeting and Finance, 22, 26-45. Frazier, P.A., Tix, A.P., & Barron, K. E. (2004). Testing moderator and mediator effect in counceling psycology research. Journal of Counceling Psychology. 51, 115-234. Frucot, V., & Shearon, W.T. (1991).Budgetary participation, locus of control, and Mexican managerial performance and job satisfaction. The Accounting Review, 66, 80-99. Frucot, V., & White, S. (2006). Managerial level and the effects of budgetary participation on managers. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21, 191-206. Galbraith, J. (1973). Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. Galbraith, J.R. (1977). Organization Design. The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, . Gerbing, D.W., & Anderson, J.C. (1984). On the meaning of within-factor correlated measurement errors. Journal of Consumer Research, 11, 572-580. Gerdin, J. (2005). Management accounting system design in manufacturing departments: An empirical investigation using a multiple contingencies approach. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 30, 99-126. Ghobadian, A. (1994) Performance measurement in local government–concept and practice. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 14, 35-51. Gibson, J. L., Ivancevich, J. M., & Donnelly, J. H. (1997). Organisations: Behaviour,Structure, Process. USA: Rob Zwettler. Gordon, L.A., & Narayanan, V.K. (1984). Management accounting systems perceived environmental uncertainty and organization structure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organization and Society, 9, 33-47. Gordon, L.A., & Miller, D. (1976). A contingency framework for the design of accounting information systems. Accounting , Organizations and Society, 1, 59-69. Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB). (1994). Concepts Statement No.2, Service Efforts and Accomplishments Reporting. Norwalk, CT: Governmental Accounting Standards Board. Government of Malaysia (1970). Report of the Royal Commission of Inquiry to Investigate into the Working of Local Authorities in West Malaysia. Kuala Lumpur: Government Printer. Govindarajan, V. (1984). Appropriateness of accounting data in performance evaluation: an empirical examination of environmental uncertainty as an intervening variable. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 9, 125-135. Govindarajan, V. (1988). A contingency approach to strategy implementation at the business-unit level: Integrating administrative mechanisms with strategy. Academy of Management Journal, 31, 828-853. Govindarajan, V., & Gupta, A. K. (1985). Linking Control System to Business Unit Strategy: Impact on Performance. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 10, 51-66. Greenberg, P.S., Greenberg, R.H., & Nouri, H. (1994). Participative budgeting: A meta-analytic examination of methodological moderators. Journal of Accounting Literature , 13, 117-141. Grizzle, G. A., & Pettijohn, C. D. (2002). Implementing Performance-Based Program Budgeting: A System-Dynamics Perspective. Public Administration Review, 62, 51-62. Gul, F. A., Tsui, J., Fong, S. C. C., & Kwok, H. Y. L. (1995).Decentralization as a moderating factor in the budgetary participation-performance relationship: Some Hong Kong evidence. Accounting and Business Research, 25,107-113. Gul, F.A., & Chia, Y.M. (1994). The effect of management accounting system, perceived environmental uncertainty, and decentralisation on managerial performance: A test of three way interaction. Accounting, Organization and Society, 19, 413-426. Guzley, R.M. (1992). Organizational climate and communication climate predictors of commitment to the organization. Management Communication Quarterly,5, 379-402. Hair, J.F., Money, A.H., Samouel, P., & Page,M. (2006). Research Method for Business. John Wiley & Son, Ltd. NJ. USA Hartman, F. G. H. (2000). The appropriateness of RAPM: Toward the future development of theory”. Accounting, Organization and Society. Vol.25, pp.451-482. Hartmann, F.G.H., & Moers, F. (1999), Testing contingency hypotheses in budgetary research: an evaluation of the use of moderated regression analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 24, 219-315. Hayduk, L., Cummings, G.G., Boadu, K., Pazderka-Robinson, H., & Boulianne, S. (2007). Testing! Testing! One, Two Three–Testing the theory in structural equation models. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 841-850. Hayes, D.C. (1977), The contingency theory of managerial accounting. The Accounting Review, 1, 22-39. Hendri, J. (2006). Organizational culture and performance measurement systems. Accounting, Organization and Society, 31, 77-103. Herbert T.T, (1976). Dimensions of Organisational Behavior, Macmillan Publishing Co. Inc. Hill, D. M. (1974). Democratic Theory and Local Government. London Allendand Unwin Ltd. Hondoko, H., T. (1995). Manajement Sumber Daya Manusia. Yogjakarta, Indonesia: Yogjakarta Press. Hope, J., & Fraser, R. (2003). Beyond Budgeting: How Managers can Break Fee from the Annual Performance Trap. Boston. Massachusetts: HBS Press. Hopwood, A.G. (1972). An empirical study of the role of accounting data in performance evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research, 10, 156-182. Hopwood, A.G. (1976). Accounting and Human Behaviour, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Horngren, C.T., Bhimani, A., Datar, S.M., & Foster, G. (2002). Management and Cost Accounting. 2nd.ed. Pearson Education. United Kingdom. House, R. J. (1974). Notes on the path-goal theory of leadership. Unpublished manuscript, University of Toronto. http://www2.epbt.gov.my/portal/?rid=senaraipbt. Accessed on August 2010. Hu, L.T., & Bentler, P.M. (1999). Cut off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. Ismail, M. A. (1989). Local government restructuring in Peninsular Malaysia: a review of a local authority function and capacity. Planning and Administration, 6, 12-26. Jablin, F. (1975). The selection Interview: Contingency theory and beyond. Human Resource Management, 14, 2-9. Johnson, P.O., & Neyman, J. (1936). Tests of certain linear hypotheses and their applications to some educational problems, Statistical Research Memoirs, 1, 57-93. Jong, R. (2003). Corruption Survey by the Kuala Lumpur Society for Transparency and Integrity: Bribery the Norm, say Many. The Star Online, 23 June, 2010. Jordan, M. M., & Merl M. H. (1999). Performance budgeting and performance funding in the States: A Status Assessment. Public Budgeting and Finance, 19, 68-88. Jöreskog, K., & Long, J.S. (1993). Introduction, in Testing Structural Equation Models, Kenneth A. Bollen and J. Scott Long, Eds. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1993), LISREL 8: Structural Equation Modeling with the SIMPLIS Command Language. Chicago , IL: Scientific Software International Inc. Jöreskog, K., & Sörbom, D. (1996), LISREL 8: User’s Reference Guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International Inc. Joshi, P.l., & Abdulla, J. (1995). An examination of the relationship among budgetary participation, budget emphasis , information asymmetry, budget attitudes and budgetary slack. Malaysia Management Review. 30, 63-69. Joshi, P. L., Al-Mudhaki, J., & Bremser, W. G. (2003). Corporate budget planning, control and performance evaluation in Bahrain. Managerial Auditing Journal. 18, 737- 750. Julnes, P. L., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilizatiio of performance measures in public organizations : An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public Administration Review, 61, 693-707. Kaiser, H.F., & Rice, J. (1974). Little Jiffy, Mark iv. Educational and Psychological Measurement, Spring, 111-117. Kenis, I. (1979). Effects of budgetary goal characteristics on managerial attitudes and performance. The Accounting Review, 54, 707-721. Kenny, D.A., & McCoach, D.B. (2003). Effect of the number of variables on measures of fit in structural equation modelling. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 333-351. Kerlinger, F.N., & Pedhazur, E.J. (1973), Multiple Regression in Behavioral Research. Holf, Rinehart and Winston, New York, NY. Kinnear P.R., & Gray, C.D. (1994). SPSS for Windows Made Simple Hove. East Sussex: Lawrence Erlbaum (UK) Taylor & Francis. Kirk Jr, T.G. (2004). The Role of Management Theory in Day-to-Day Management Practices of a College Library Director. Library Administration & Management Publication. Illiniois, Chicago. Klien, R.B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling. New York. NY: The Guilford Press. Klien, R.B. (2005). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modelling(2nd Ed.). New York. NY: The Guilford Press. Kloot, L., & Martin, J. (2000). Strategic performance management: a balanced approach to performance management issues in local government. Management Accounting Research, 11, 231-251. Kluvers, R. (2001). An analysis of introducing program budgeting in local government. Public Budgeting and Finance , 21, 29-45. Knights, D., & Wilmott, H.C. (1987). Organizational culture as management strategy: a critique and illustration from the financial services industry. International Studies of Management and Organization, 17, 40-63. Kren, L. (1992). Budgetary participation and managerial performance: The impact of information and environmental volatility. The Accounting Review, 7, 511-526. Kren, L., & Liao, W. M. (1988). The role of accounting information in the control of organization: A review of the evidence. Journal of Accounting Literature, 7, 280-309. Kyj, L., & Nouri, H. (2008). The effects of performance feedback on prior budgetary participative research using survey methodology:An empirical study. Critical Perspective on Accounting, 19, 1431-1453. Lambert, E.G. (2004). The impact of job characteristics on correctional staff members. The Prison Journal, 84, 208-227. Lapsley, I., & Wright, E. (2004). The difussion of management accounting innovation in public sector: a research agenda. Management Accounting Research, 15,355-374. Larcker, D.F. (1981). The perceived importance of selected information characteristics for strategic capital budgeting decisions. The Accounting Review, 7, 519-538. Lau, C. M., & Buckland, C. (2000). Budget emphasis, participation, task difficulty and performance: The effect of diversity within culture. Accounting and Business Research. 31, 37-55. Lau, C.M., & Moser, A. (2008). Behavioral effects on nonfinancial performance measures: The role of procedural fairness. Behavioral Research of Accounting, 20, 55-71. Lau, C.M., & Tan, S.L.C. (2003). The effect of job-relevant information on the relationship between evaluative style and job satisfaction. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting., 21, 17-34. Lau, C.M., Low, L.C. and Eggleton, Ian. R.C. (1997). The interactive effect of budget emphasis, participation and task difficulty on managerial performance: A cross cultural study. Accounting Auditing & Accountability Journal, 10, 175-197. Lawrence, P., & Lorsch, J. (1967). Organization and Environment. Boston. Harvard University. Leach-Lo’pez, M.A., Stammerjohan, W.W., & Lee, K.S. (2009). Budgetary participation and job performance of South Korean managers mediated by job satisfaction and job relevant information. Management Research News, 32, 220-238. Leach-Lo’pez, M.A., Stammerjohan, W.W., & McNair, F.M. (2008).The effect of budgetary participation conflict on job performance of Mexican and US managers. Advance in Accounting, Incorprating Advances in International Accounting, 24, 49-64. Leach-Lo’pez, M.A., Stammerjohan, W.W., & Rigsby, J.T. (2008).An update on budgetary participation, locus of control, and the effect on Mexican managerial performance and job satisfaction. IABR & TLC Conference Proceedings. San Juan, Puerto Rico, USA. Lee, R. D., & Burns, R. C. (2000). Performance measurement in State budgeting: Advancement and backsliding from 1990 to 1995. Public Budgeting and Finance, 20, 38-54. Lincoln, J.R., & Kalleberg, A.L. (1985). Work organization and workplace commitment: A study of plants and employees in the U.S. and Japan. American Sociological Review, 2, 738- 760. Ling, S. (2003). Corruption will Weaken Civil Service, says Abdullah. The Star Online, 12 August. Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. (1990). A Theory of Goal Setting and Task Performance. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Locke, E. A. & Schweiger, D. (1979). Participation in decision making: One more look. In B. M. Staw (Ed.), Research In Organizational Behavior, 1, Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Lukka, K. (1988). Budgetary biasing in organizational: Theoritical framework and empirical evidence. Accounting, Organiaztion and Society, 13, 205-218. Lunenburg, F.C. (2011). Expectancy theory of motivation. International Journal of Management, Business, and Administration. 15. 120-145. MacCallum, R.C.,Browne, M.W., & Sugawara, H.M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modelling. Psychological Method, 1, 130-149. Macnealy, M.S. (1999). Strategies for Empirical Research in Writing. Boston: Allyn. & Bacon, Reviewed by Ellen Barton. Wayne State University. Magner, N., Welker, R.B., & Campbell, T.L. (1996). Testing a model of cognitive budgetary participation processes in a latent variable structural equations framework. Accounting and Business Research, 27, 41-50. Magner, N., Welker, R.B., & Cambell, T.L. (1995). The interactive effect of budgetary participation and budget favorability on attitude toward budget decision makers: A research note. Accounting, Organization and Society, 20, 611-618. Mahamad Tayib., & Mohamad Rosni Amir Hussin. (2003). Good budgeting practices in Malaysian public universities. Journal of Finance and Management in Public Services, 3, 41- 51. Mahoney, T.A., Jerdee, T.H., & Carroll, S.J. (1963). Development of Managerial Performance: A Research Approach. South-Western Publishing Co., Cincinnati, OH. Mahoney, T.A., Jerdee, T.H., & Carroll, S.J. (1965). The Jobs of management. Industrial Relations, 1, 97-110. Mahoney, T.A., Jerdee, T.H., & Carrol, S.J. (1965). Development of managerial performance: A research approach. Cincinnati, oh: South-Western managerial behavior and performance. The Accounting Review. 6, 813-829. Malaysian Treasury, (1994). Treasury Circular: Kula Lumpur. Malaysia Treasury. (1988). Treasury Circular: Kuala Lumpur. Manogran, P. (1997).Attitudes and how it effects performance . Khidmat. 26, 20-21. Marsdan, P.V., Kalleberg, A. L., & Cook, C.R. (1993). Gender differences in organizational commitment: Influences of work positions and family roles. Work and Occupations, 20, 368-390. Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.T., & Wen, Z. (2004). In search of golden rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cut off values for fit indexes and dangers in over generalizing Hu and Bentler's findings. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 320-41. McDonald, R.P., & Ho, M.H.R. (2002),Principles and practice in reporting statistical equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64-82. McIntosh, C. (2006).Rethinking fit assessment in structural equation modelling: A commentary and elaboration on Barrett (2007). Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 859-867. McIntyre, I. (2004).ACA reports tells why local governments open to bribery. The Star Online, 13 January. McQuitty, S. (2004). Statistical power and structural equation models in business research. Journal of Business Research, 57, 175-83. McShane, S. L., & Von Glinow, M. (2000). Organisational Behaviour. Boston:McGraw- Hill. Melkers, J., & Katherine, W. (1998). The State of the States: Performance-Based Budgeting requirements in 47 Out of 50. Public Administration Review, 58, 66-73. Melkers, J., & Katherine, W. (2001). Budgeters views of State performance budgeting systems. Public Administration Review, 61, 54-64. Melkers, J., & Willoughby, K. (2005). Models of performance-measurement use in local governments: Understanding budgeting, communication, and lasting effects. Public Administration Review, 65, 180-191. Mellor, R. (2001). Performance Measurement and Management in Asia-Pacific local Government. A Research Project Coordinated by the UTS Centre for Local Government. Merchant, K.A. (1981). The design of the corporate budgeting system: Influences on managerial behavior and performance. Accounting Review, 56, 813-829. Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, Research, and Application. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Meyer, J.P., & Aallen, N.J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61–89. Meyer, J.P., Becker, T.E., & Vandenberghe, C. (2004). Employee commitment and motivation: a conceptual analysis and integrative model. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 991–1007. Mia, L. (1993),The role of mas information in organisations : An empirical study. The British Accounting Review, 25, 269-285. Mia, L., & Chenhall, R.H. (1994). The usefulness of management accounting systems, functional differentiation and managerial effectiveness. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 19, 1-13. Milani, K. (1975). The relationship of participation in budget-setting to industrial supervisor performance and attitudes: A field study. The Accounting Review, 4, 274-284. Milani, K.W. (1975). The relationship of participation in budget-setting to industrial supervisor performance and attitudes: A field study. The Accounting Review, 4, 274-285. Miles M. (1992). The Effective Manager: Semi-Tough. McGraw Hill. Miles, J., & Shevlin, M. (1998). Effects of sample size, model specification and factor loadings on the GFI in confirmatory factor analysis. Personality and Individual Differences, 25, 85-90. Miles, J., & Shevlin, M. (2007), A time and a place for incremental fit indices. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 869-874. Miles, R., E. (1975). Theories on Management: Implication for Organizational Behavior and Development. New York: McGraw-Hill. Mintzberg, H. (1973). The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row. Ministry of Housing and Local Government Official Website (2010). PBT Star Rating. Retrieved November 28, 2010, from http://jkt.kpkt.gov.my. Mintzberg, H. (1979). The Structuring of Organizations, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Misumi J., & Peterson, M.F. (1985). The performance maintenance theory of leadership: Review of a Japanese research program. Administrative Science Quarterly, 30, 198- 223. Mitchell, RJ. (2001). Path analysis: Pollination. In SM Scheiner and J Gurevitch, eds. Design and Analysis of Ecological Experiments, Second Edition. Oxford University Press. Mohamed Afandi. (1989). Local Government Restructuring in Peninsular Malaysia: A Review of the Local Authority Function and Capacity, in Planning and Administration, 16, Autumn, IULA, The Hague. Mohd Nor, Nik Nazli, & Abdul Hamid. (2008). Budgetary participation and performance: some malaysian evidence. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 21, 659- 673. Moores, K., & Yuen, S. (2001). Management accounting systems and organizational configuration: A life-cycle perspective. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26, 351- 389. Morse, J., & Lorsch, J. (1970). Beyond theory Y. Harvard Business Review, 48, 61-68. Mowday, R.T., Porter, L.W., & Steers, R.M. (1982). Employee Organization Linkages: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism, and Turnover. New York: Academic Press.. Mowday, R.T., Steers, R.M., & Porter, L.W. (1979). The measurement of organizational commitment. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 14, 224-247. Mulaik, S.A., James, L.R., Van Alstine, J., Bennet, N., Lind, S., & Stilwell, C.D. (1989).Evaluation of goodness-of -fit indices for structural equation models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 430-45. Murray, D. (1990). The performance effects of participative budgeting: An integration of intervening and moderating variables. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 1,104-123. Murwaningsari, E. (2008). The role of organizational commitment and procedural justice in moderating the relationship between budgeting participation and managerial performance. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 10, 185-210. Muthiah, W. (2003). More Brickbats for MPAJ. The Star Online, 9 June. New Zealand Auditor (2010). Local government: Examples of better practice in setting local authorities' performance measures. New Zealand. Nor Aziah, A.K., & Scapens, R.W. (2007). Coporatisation and accounting change: the role of accounting and accountants in a Malaysian public utility. Management Accounting Research, 18, 209-247. Norusis, M.J. (1992). SPSS-PC. Professional Statistics. Chicago, SPSS. Nouri, H., & Parker, R.J. (1996). The effect of organizational commitment on the relation between budgetary participation and budgetary slack. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 8, 74-91. Nouri, H., & Parker, R.J. (1998). The relationship between budget participation and job performance: The role of budget adequacy and organizational commitment. Accounting Organization and Society, 23, 467-483. Nouri, H., Kyj, L., & Parker, R.J. (1999). The effect of performance reporting on budgetary participation: An attribution theory analysis. Advance in Management Accounting, 8, 211-223. O’Connor, N.G.(1995). The influence of organizational culture on the usefulness of budget participation by Singaporean-Chinese managers. Accounting, Organization and Society, 23. 49-76. Onu, G. (1988). Accountability and efficiency: Formal controls and performance management in Nigeria local government system. International Social Science Journal, 3, 155-176. Oswick, C., & grant, D. (1996). Personnel management in public sector, power, roles and relationship. Personnel Review, 25, 4-18. Othman, R. (2005). Accountability and Level of Management Control in A Contingency Theory Framework: A Path Analytic Study of Local Governments in Malaysia. PhD Thesis, International Islamic University of Malaysia. Otley, D. (1995). Management Control, Organizational Design and Accounting Information Systems, in Ashton, D., Hopper, T., Scapens, R.W. (Eds),Issues in Management Accounting. Prentice-Hall. Upper Saddle River. NJ. Otley, D., & Fakiolas, A. (2000). Reliance on accounting performance measures: dead end or new beginning? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25, 497-510. Otley, D., & Pollanen, R.M. (2000). Budgetary criteria in performance evaluation: A critical appraisal using new evidence. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 25, 483-96. Otley, D. T. (1980). The contingency theory of management accounting: Achievement and prognosis. Accounting, Organizations and Society. 5, 194-208. Pallant, J. (2001).The SPSS Survival Manual: A Step-by-Step Guide to Data Analysis Using SPSS for Windows (version 10). St Leonards, NSW: Allen & Unwin. Parker, R. J., & Kyj, L. (2006). Vertical information sharing in the budgeting process. Accounting. Organizations and Society, 31, 27-45. PEMANDU. (2010). Program Transformasi Ekonomi. Jabatan Perdana Menteri. Kuala Lumpur. Perera, S., Harrison, G., & Poole, M. (1997). Customer-focused manufacturing strategy and the use of operations- based non-financial performance measures: A research note. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 22, 557-572. Phang, S. N. (1989). Sistem Kerajaan Tempatan. Selangor: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Phang, S. N. (2008). Transforming Local Government in Malaysia:Implications for centralisation and democratization . Journal of Malaysian Chinese Studies, 11, 97-110. Phang, S.N. (1996). Sistem Kerajaan Tempatan di Malaysia. Selangor: Percetakan Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Pilcher, R. (2005). Local government financial key performance indicators–not so relevant, reliable and accountable. International Journal of Performance Management , 54, 451-467. Poister, T. H., & Streib, G. (1999). Performance measurement in municipal government: Assessing the State of the practice. Public Administration Review, 59, 325-35. Pollanen, R.M. (2005). Performance measurement in municipalities: Emperical evidence in Canadian context. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 18, 4-24. Pollitt, C. (2009). Structural Change and Public Service Performance: International Lessons. Research Note. Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford, Oxford University Press. Porter, L.W., Steers, R.M., Mowday, R.T., & Boulian, P.V. (1974). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. Journal of Applied Psychology, 59, 609-723. Prime Minister’s Department (PMD) (1991). Public Service Innovation Award, Development Administration Circular, No. 3. Kuala Lumpur: PMD. Prime Minister’s Department (PMD) (1992). Manual on Micro Accounting System(SPM). Development Administration Circular , No. 3. Kuala Lumpur: PMD. Prime Minister’s Department (PMD) (2011). Manual on Standards Accounting System for Government Agencies (SAGA). Development Administration Circular, No. 1. Kuala Lumpur: PMD. Prime Minister’s Department (PMD) (1992). Guideline on Total Quality Management in the Public Service. Development Administration Circular, No.1. Kualaa Lumpur:PMD. Productivity Commission. (2003). Review of Government Servive 2003. Chapter 1.3. available at www.pc.gov.au/gsp/ 2003/chapter01.pdf. Provost, L. (2010). Local Government: Examples of Better Practice in Setting Local Authorities’ Performance Measures. Discussion Paper (Section 21 of the Public Audit Act 2001). Quirin, J. J., Donnelly, P. D., & Bryan, O. D. (2006). Antecedents of Organizational Commitment: The Role of Perception of Equity. Advances in Accounting Behavioural Research. 4, 261-280. Rainey, H., G. (2003). Understanding and Managing Public Organizations: The Jossey-Bass Non-Profit and Public management series. Rajasundaram, P. (2005). Public sector performance improvements in malaysia and challenges ahead. Journal INTAN, 5, 16-32. Randall, D. M. (1990). The consequences of organizational commitment: Methodological investigation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 11, 361-378. Rauf, F. A., Yatim, N., Salleh, S. C., Yusoff, H., Poobalan , U. R., & Othman, R. (2004). Public Sector Acounting: Malaysian Context (Second ed.). Kuala Lumpur: Prentice Hall. Rehfuss, J. (1989). The Job of Public Manager. Sacramento: Richard D. Irwin, Inc. California State University. Reisinger, Y., & Mavondo, F. (2006). Structural equation modeling: Critical issues and new developments. Journal of Travel and Tourism Marketing, 21, 41-71. Robinson, M. (2000). Contract Budgeting. Public Administration, 78, 75-90. Rouse, J. (1999). Performance Management, Quality Management, and Contracts, in Horton, S. & Farnham, D. (Eds), Public Management in Britain, Macmillan. Basingstoke , 5, 76-93. Saarokoski, L., & Agbejuly, A. (2006). The effect of cost management on the relationship between budgetary participation and managerial performance. The British accounting Review, 38, 427-440. Sabri, N. R., & Jaber, R. Y. (2007). Managerial performance of Palestinian local authorities. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 1, 350-363. Saravanamuttu, J.,(2000). The Snuffing Out of Local Democracy in Malaysia. Aliran. Scapello, V., & Campbell, J.P. (1983). Job satisfaction: Are all the parts there?. Personnel Psychology, 4, 577-600. Schumacker, R. E., & Lomax, R. G. (1996). A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modelling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Scott, T.W., & Tiessen, P. (1999). Performance measurement and managerial terms. Accounting, Organization and Society, 24, 263-285. Scott, W. R. (1992). Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems. Eaglewood Cliffs, N. J. Prentice-Hall. Sekaran, U. (2005). Research Methods for Business: A Skill-Building Approach (4th ed.). NY: John Wiley & Sons. Sen S., & Saxena, S. (1999). Managerial effectiveness: Managing with a difference. Personnel Today, 20, 5-11. Sharma, R., Jones, S., & Ratnatunga, J. (2006). The relationship among broad scope mas, managerial control, performance, and job relevant information. Review of Accounting and Finance, 5, 228-250. Sharma, S., Mukherjee, S., Kumar, A., & Dillon, W.R. (2005) . A simulation study to investigate the use of cut off values for assessing model fit in covariance structure models. Journal of Business Research, 58, 935-943. Shaw, J.D., Delery, J.E., & Mohammed, H.A.A. (2003). Organizational commitment and performance among guest workers and citizens of an Arab country. Journal of Business Research, 56, 1021-1030. Sheilds, M. D., & Young, S.M. (1993). Antecedent and consequences of participative budgeting: Evidence on the effects of asymmetrical information. Journal of Management Accounting Research, 4, 265-280. Shields, J.F., & Shields, M.D. (1998). Antecedents of participative budgeting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 23, 49-76. Siddiquee, N. A. (2006). Public management reform in Malaysia: Recent initiatives and experiences. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 19, 339 -358. Siddiquee, N.A., & Mohamed, M.Z. (2007). Paradox of public sector reforms in Malaysia: A good governance perspective. Public Administration Quarterly. Randallstown, 31, 284-315. Siddiquee, N.A. (2008). Service delivery innovations and governance: the Malaysian experience. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 2, 194-214. Siddiquee, N.A. (2010). Managing for results: lessons from public management reform in Malaysia. The International Journal of Public Sector Management, 23, 38-52 Simons, R. (2000). Performance Measurement and Control Systems for Implementing Strategy: Text and Cases, Prentice- Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Singh, G. (1994). Land Laws, Land Policies and Planning in Malaysia, Urban Management Programme Regional Office for Asia–Pacific. Sneed, J., & Herman, C.M. (1990). Influence of job characteristics and organizational commitment on job satisfaction of hospital foodservice employees. J Am Diet Assoc., 8, 1072-1076. Sofian, S. (2010). The impact of budget participation on job performance of University Executives: A Study of APTIK Member Universities in Indonesia. Kasetsart Journal Social Science, 31, 271-279. Soobaroyen, T., & Poorundersing, B. (2008). The effectiveness of management accounting systems: Evidence from functional managers in a developing country. Managerial Auditing Journal, 23, 187-219. Sprinkle, G. B. (2003). Perspectives on Experimental Research in Managerial Accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 28, 287-318. Stedry, A.C. (1960). Budget control and cost behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Steers, R.M. (1977). Antecedents and outcomes of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly , 22, 46-56. Steiger, J.H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 214-212. Steiger, J.H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modelling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 893-898. Steven, J. (1996). Applied Multivariate Statistics for the Social Science. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Mahwah. N. J. Publication. Subramaniam, N., & Mia, L. (2001). The relation between decentralised structure, budgetary participation and organization commitment, the moderating role of manager’s value orientation towards innovation. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability, 14, 12-39. Sugiyono. (2008).Metod Penelitian Bisnis. Bandung: Alfabeta. Sudman, S., & Bradburn, N. (1982). Asking Questions: A Practical Guide to Questionnaire Design. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers. Sumarno, J. (2005). Pengaruh komitmen organisasi dan gaya kepemimpinan terhadap hubungan antara partisipasi anggaran dan kinerja manajerial. KELOLA,18, 56-62. Swiernga, R.I., & Moncur, R.H. (1975). Some Effect of Participative Budgeting on Managerial Behavior. National Association of Accountant: New York. Tabachnick, B.G., & Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using Multivariate Statistics (5th ed.). New York: Allyn and Bacon. Taylor, D., Fadzlon, A.H., & Zuraidah, M.S. (2008). The factors impacting managerial performance in local government authorities within an islamic cultural setting. JAMAR,6, The Local Government ACT 1976 (ACT 171). Percetakan Nasional Malaysia Bhd Thompson, J.D. (1990). Organizations in Action, McGraw Hill, New Jersey. Tiessen, P., & Waterhouse, J.H. (1983). Towards a descriptive theory of management accounting. Accounting, Organisations and Society, 8, 251-67. Triantafillou, P. (2002). Machinating the responsive bureaucrat: excellence work culture in Malaysian public sector. Asian Journal of Public Administration, 24, 185-209. Tsui, & Judy. S.L. (2001). The effect of culture on the relationship between budgetary participation, management accounting system, and managerial performance: an analyses of Chinese and Western managers. International Journal of Accounting, 36, 125-146. United Nations. (1995). Twelfth Meeting of Experts on The United Nations Programme In Public Administration And Finance. New York, 31 July-11 August 1995. Vagneur, K., & Peiperl, M. (2000).Reconsidering performance evaluative style. Accounting Orgainsations and Society, 25, 511-25. Weiss, D. J., Davis, R. V., England, G.W., & Lofquist, L.H. (1967). Manual for Minnesota Satisfaction Questionnaire. Minnesota Studies in Vocational Rehabilitation XXII. October . Bulletin 45. Welsch, H.P., & Lavan, H. (1981). Inter-relationships between organizational commitment and job characteristics, job satisfaction, professional behavior, and organizational climate. Human Relations, 34, 1079-1089. Wentzel, K. (2002). The influence of fairness perceptions and goal commitment on managers’ performance in budget setting. Behavioural Research in Accounting, 14, 247-271. Whittington, R., & Stacey, R. (1994). Strategic management and organizational dynamics. Journal of Management Studies, 31, 453-455. Widener, S.K. (2006). Associations between strategic resources importance and performance measure use: The impact on firm performance. Management Accounting Research, 17, 433-457. Williams, J.J. and Seaman, A.E. (2001). Predicting Change in Management Accounting Systems: National Culture and Industry Effects. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 26, 443-460. Willoughby, K. G., & Melkers, J.K. (2000). Implementing PBB: Conflicting views of success. Public Budgeting and Finance, 20, 105-120. Worral, L., Collinge, C., & Bill,T. (1998). Managing strategy in local government. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 11, 472-493. Xavier, J. A. (1996). Budgetary Control and Management at the Malaysian Central Budget Process-Principles and Practice. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd. Xavier, J. A. (2001). Budgeting for Performance Principles and Practice. Kuala Lumpur: INTAN. Xavier, J. A. (2002).Understanding SBD (The Modified Budgeting System). Kuala Lumpur: INTAN. Yuen, D. (2007). Antecedents of budgetary participation: Enhancing employees’ job performance. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22, 533-548. Zakaria, Z., Noordin, N., & Sawal, M. (2010). Environmental functions provided by Malaysian local government: User’s perception. Journal of Social Sciences, 6, 296-302. Zeffane, R.(1994). Patterns of organizational commitment and perceived management style: A comparison of public and private sector employees. Human Relations, 47, 977-1010. Zulkifli, T. (2009). Pengauditan Pihak Berkuasa Kerajaan Tempatan: Isu dan Cadangan Penambahbaikan. Laporan Persidangan Juruaudit Awam. Shah Alam.