Style Analysis of Malaysian Islamic Bond Unit Trust Funds
This study examines whether or not asset allocation styles of unit trusts different from their original objectives over the study period and sub-periods, which are during and after the financial crisis. The period of study is six (6) years starting from January 2007 to December 2012 and has been div...
Saved in:
主要作者: | |
---|---|
格式: | Thesis |
语言: | eng eng |
出版: |
2014
|
主题: | |
在线阅读: | https://etd.uum.edu.my/4028/1/s813770.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4028/2/s813770_abstract.pdf |
标签: |
添加标签
没有标签, 成为第一个标记此记录!
|
id |
my-uum-etd.4028 |
---|---|
record_format |
uketd_dc |
institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
collection |
UUM ETD |
language |
eng eng |
advisor |
Abdullah, Nur Adiana Hiau |
topic |
HG Finance |
spellingShingle |
HG Finance Ahmad Harith Ashrofie, Hanafi Style Analysis of Malaysian Islamic Bond Unit Trust Funds |
description |
This study examines whether or not asset allocation styles of unit trusts different from their original objectives over the study period and sub-periods, which are during and after the financial crisis. The period of study is six (6) years starting from January 2007 to December 2012 and has been divided into overall period from January 2007 to December 2012 and two sub-periods: financial crisis from
January 2007 to December 2009 and post financial crisis from January 2010 to December 2012. This study uses MSCI Malaysia Growth Index, MSCI Malaysia Value Index, 1-month Kuala Lumpur Inter-bank Offer Rate (KLIBOR), TRBPAM Islamic Government Index, TRBPAM Islamic Corporate Index, MSCI
World Index as benchmarks for asset classes. The total of 14 Islamic bond funds used as sample and analysed using Return Based Style Analysis (RBSA). The results show there are some unit trusts that have significant different styles
when compared to their original objectives for overall period and two sub-periods, either during financial crisis or post financial crisis period. The variation in monthly returns for most of the funds for overall period and sub-
periods mainly could be explained by the variation in their styles. The average style of overall period and two sub-
periods shows that fund managers have focused their
investment mainly in bonds, either the government or corporate bonds. However, there is a small proportion of investment is placed in asset classes such as equity
and money market instruments. The average fund returns could be explained mainly by the variation in the funds’ styles. |
format |
Thesis |
qualification_name |
masters |
qualification_level |
Master's degree |
author |
Ahmad Harith Ashrofie, Hanafi |
author_facet |
Ahmad Harith Ashrofie, Hanafi |
author_sort |
Ahmad Harith Ashrofie, Hanafi |
title |
Style Analysis of Malaysian Islamic Bond Unit Trust Funds |
title_short |
Style Analysis of Malaysian Islamic Bond Unit Trust Funds |
title_full |
Style Analysis of Malaysian Islamic Bond Unit Trust Funds |
title_fullStr |
Style Analysis of Malaysian Islamic Bond Unit Trust Funds |
title_full_unstemmed |
Style Analysis of Malaysian Islamic Bond Unit Trust Funds |
title_sort |
style analysis of malaysian islamic bond unit trust funds |
granting_institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
granting_department |
Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4028/1/s813770.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4028/2/s813770_abstract.pdf |
_version_ |
1747827666851987456 |
spelling |
my-uum-etd.40282022-04-09T23:16:46Z Style Analysis of Malaysian Islamic Bond Unit Trust Funds 2014-05 Ahmad Harith Ashrofie, Hanafi Abdullah, Nur Adiana Hiau Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HG Finance This study examines whether or not asset allocation styles of unit trusts different from their original objectives over the study period and sub-periods, which are during and after the financial crisis. The period of study is six (6) years starting from January 2007 to December 2012 and has been divided into overall period from January 2007 to December 2012 and two sub-periods: financial crisis from January 2007 to December 2009 and post financial crisis from January 2010 to December 2012. This study uses MSCI Malaysia Growth Index, MSCI Malaysia Value Index, 1-month Kuala Lumpur Inter-bank Offer Rate (KLIBOR), TRBPAM Islamic Government Index, TRBPAM Islamic Corporate Index, MSCI World Index as benchmarks for asset classes. The total of 14 Islamic bond funds used as sample and analysed using Return Based Style Analysis (RBSA). The results show there are some unit trusts that have significant different styles when compared to their original objectives for overall period and two sub-periods, either during financial crisis or post financial crisis period. The variation in monthly returns for most of the funds for overall period and sub- periods mainly could be explained by the variation in their styles. The average style of overall period and two sub- periods shows that fund managers have focused their investment mainly in bonds, either the government or corporate bonds. However, there is a small proportion of investment is placed in asset classes such as equity and money market instruments. The average fund returns could be explained mainly by the variation in the funds’ styles. 2014-05 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4028/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4028/1/s813770.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4028/2/s813770_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdullah, F., Hassan, T., & Mohamad, S. (2007). Investigation of Performance of Malaysian Islamic Unit Trust Funds:Comparison With Conventional Unit Trust Funds. Managerial Finance, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp 142-153. Abdullah, N. A., & Abdullah, N. A. (2009). The Performance of Malaysian Unit Trusts Investing in Domestic Versus International Markets. Asian Academy of Management Journal of Accounting and Finance, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp 77-100. Bodson, L., Coen, A., & Hubner, G. (2008). Dynamic Hedge Fund Style Analysis with Errors-in-Variables. Social Science Research Network. Brown, K. C., & Reilly, F. K. (2009). Analysis of Investments and Management of Portfolios (9th ed.). Canada: South-Western. de Roon, F.A., Nijman, T. E., & ter Horst, J. R. (2004). Evaluating Style Analysis. Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol.11, No. 1, Pages 29–53. Dor, A. B., & Jagannathan, R. (2003). Understanding Mutual Fund and Hedge Fund Styles Using Return Based Style Analysis. Journal of Investment Management, 94-134. Elton, E. J., Gruber, M. J., Brown, S. J., & Goetzmann, W. N. (2011). Modern Portfolio Theory and Investment Analysis 8th ed. Asia: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Faff, R. W., Gharghori, P., Ip, B. H., & Nguyen, A. (2012). Return-Based Style Analysis in Australian Funds. Multinational Finance Journal, 155-188. Ferreira, M. A., Keswani, A., Miguel, A. F., & Ramos, S. B. (2012). The Determinants of Mutual Fund Performance: A Cross-Country Study. Review of Finance, 1-43. Flecther, J., & Forbes, D. (2002). An Exploration of the Persistence of UK Unit Trust Performance. Journal of Empirical Finance, Vol.9, pp 475-493. Fung, W., & Hsieh, D. A. (1998). Performance Attribution and Style Analysis:From Mutual Funds to Hedge Funds. Duke University working paper. Gibson, Roger C., (1996). Asset Allocation: Balancing Financial Risk, 2nd Edition.,USA: McGraw-Hill. Hartono, A. F., Soekarno, S., & Damayanti, S. M. (2014). Islamic and Conventional Equity Fund Rating Performance withalReturn, Sharpe, Modified Snail Trail,and Morningstar Rating Groundwork. Journal of Economics, Business and Management, Vol.2, No. 1, pp 74-80. Hassan, M. K., Faisal Khan, A. N., & Ngow, T. (2010). Is Faith-Based Investing Rewarding? The Case for Malaysian Islamic Unit Trust Funds. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, Vol. 1, No. 2, pp 148-171. Karacabey, A. A., & Gökgöz, F. (2006). Investment Style Analysis for the Turkish Individual Retirement Funds. Investment Management and Financial Innovations, Volume 3, Issue 2. Lau, W. Y. (2007). An Integrated Framework for Style Analysis: How is it Useful to Malaysian Equity Trust Investors. Managerial Finance, Vol. 33, No.4, pp 122-141. Lau, W. Y. (2002). Does Asset Allocation Explain the Styles and Performance of Unit Trust Funds: A Style Analysis with the Evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Malaysian Studies, Vol. XX, No.2, pp 1-32. Lau, W. Y. (2005). How Persistant is Equity Style Performance Among Malaysian Fund Managers? Osaka Economic Paper, Vol.55, No.3, pp 64-82. Lau, W. Y. (2008). Investigating Equity Style Portfolio Risk Using VaR: An Empirical Study Based on Malaysian Mutual Funds. Osaka Economic Papers, Vol.57, No.4, pp 100-118. Lau, W. Y. (2006). Investment Style of Mutual Funds: How is it Useful In Communicating Economic Trends to Investors?". Osaka Economic Papers, Vol. 55, No.4, pp 139-156. Lee, S. (1999). Style Analysis and Property Fund Performance. Journal of Property Investment & Finance, Vol.17 No.2 pp.145-156. Ministry of Finance Malaysia. (2013). Monetary and Financial Developments, Economic Reports 2012/2013. Ministry of Finance Malaysia. Otten, R., & Bams, D. (2000). Statistical Tests for Return-Based Style Analysis. Social Science Research Network. Rekenthaler, J., Gambera, M., & Charlson, J. (2004). Estimating Portfolio Style in U.S.Equity Funds:A Comparative Study of Portfolio-Based Fundamental Style Analysis and Returns-Based Style Analysis. Morningstar Research Report, pp 1-21. Sawicki, J. (2009). An Application of Returns-Based Style Analysis to Investigating the Disappearance of the Size Premium. Journal of Modelling in Management, Vol. 4 No. 3, 2009, pp. 216-234. Sharpe, W. F. (1992). Asset Allocation: Management Style and Performance Measurement. Journal of Portfolio Management, pp. 7-19. Swinkels, L., & Van Der Sluis, P. J. (2002) Return-Based Style Analysis with Time-Varying Exposures. Social Science Research Network. Taib, F. M., & Isa, M. (2007). Malaysian Unit Trust Aggregate Performance. Managerial Finance, Vol. 33, No. 2, pp 102-121. ter Horst, J. R., Nijman, T. E., & de Roon, F. A. (1998). Style Analysis and Performance Evaluation of Dutch Mutual Funds. Center Discussion Paper No. 9850. |