The mediating effect of employee engagement on the relationship between perceived organizational support (POS) and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB)
The main purpose of this study is to identify the mediating effect of employee engagement on the relationship between perceived organizational support and organization citizenship behavior among employees at Alor Setar Prison Department. Data was collected through a questionnaire survey of 200 respo...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | eng eng |
Published: |
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://etd.uum.edu.my/4117/1/s809959.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4117/2/s809959_abstract.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my-uum-etd.4117 |
---|---|
record_format |
uketd_dc |
institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
collection |
UUM ETD |
language |
eng eng |
advisor |
Sri Ramalu, Subramaniam |
topic |
HD58.9 Organizational Effectiveness. |
spellingShingle |
HD58.9 Organizational Effectiveness. Aini Wizana, Ismail The mediating effect of employee engagement on the relationship between perceived organizational support (POS) and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) |
description |
The main purpose of this study is to identify the mediating effect of employee engagement on the relationship between perceived organizational support and organization citizenship behavior among employees at Alor Setar Prison Department. Data was collected through a questionnaire survey of 200 respondents using the approach of quantitative research methods. Analysis of the quantitative data suggests that there is a relationship between perceived organizational support and organization citizenship behavior. The result suggested that there is a significant and positive positive relationship. Except that, there also have significant relationship between perceived organizational support and employee engagement. The results also shows there have relationship between employee engagement and organization citizenship behavior. And lastly is this research also examines the mediating effect of employee engagement on the relationship between perceived organizational support and organization citizenship. The finding showed that employee engagement full mediate the perceived organizational support and organization citizenship behavior. |
format |
Thesis |
qualification_name |
masters |
qualification_level |
Master's degree |
author |
Aini Wizana, Ismail |
author_facet |
Aini Wizana, Ismail |
author_sort |
Aini Wizana, Ismail |
title |
The mediating effect of employee engagement on the relationship between perceived organizational support (POS) and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) |
title_short |
The mediating effect of employee engagement on the relationship between perceived organizational support (POS) and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) |
title_full |
The mediating effect of employee engagement on the relationship between perceived organizational support (POS) and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) |
title_fullStr |
The mediating effect of employee engagement on the relationship between perceived organizational support (POS) and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) |
title_full_unstemmed |
The mediating effect of employee engagement on the relationship between perceived organizational support (POS) and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) |
title_sort |
mediating effect of employee engagement on the relationship between perceived organizational support (pos) and organizational citizenship behavior (ocb) |
granting_institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
granting_department |
Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4117/1/s809959.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4117/2/s809959_abstract.pdf |
_version_ |
1747827682823897088 |
spelling |
my-uum-etd.41172022-04-09T23:20:22Z The mediating effect of employee engagement on the relationship between perceived organizational support (POS) and organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) 2014 Aini Wizana, Ismail Sri Ramalu, Subramaniam Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HD58.9 Organizational Effectiveness. The main purpose of this study is to identify the mediating effect of employee engagement on the relationship between perceived organizational support and organization citizenship behavior among employees at Alor Setar Prison Department. Data was collected through a questionnaire survey of 200 respondents using the approach of quantitative research methods. Analysis of the quantitative data suggests that there is a relationship between perceived organizational support and organization citizenship behavior. The result suggested that there is a significant and positive positive relationship. Except that, there also have significant relationship between perceived organizational support and employee engagement. The results also shows there have relationship between employee engagement and organization citizenship behavior. And lastly is this research also examines the mediating effect of employee engagement on the relationship between perceived organizational support and organization citizenship. The finding showed that employee engagement full mediate the perceived organizational support and organization citizenship behavior. 2014 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4117/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4117/1/s809959.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4117/2/s809959_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Bateman, T. S., & Organ, D. W. 1983. Job satisfaction and the good soldier: The relationship between affect and employee “citizenship.” Academy of Management Journal, 26: 587–595. Bakker, A.B. and Demerouti, E. (2008), “Towards a model of work engagement”, Career Development International , Vol. 13, pp. 209-23. Baron, R.M., and Kenny, D.A, (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research : conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51 (6). 1173-1182. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514 .51.6.1173. Baumark, R. (2004). The missing link: The role of employee engagement in business success, (report of a Hewitt Associates/Michael Treacy study). Workspan. Blau, P. (1964), Exchange and Power in Social Life, Wiley, New York, NY. Bordage G, Dawson B. Experimental study design and grant writing in 8 steps and 28 questions. Medical Education 2003; 37: 376–85. Conway, J.M. (1999), “Distinguishing contextual performance from task performance for managerial jobs”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 84 No. 1, pp. 3-13. Corporate Leadership Council (2004). Driving Employee Performance and Retention Through Engagement. Washington, D.C., and London. Christian, M.S., Garza, A.S. and Slaughter, J.E. (2011), “Work engagement: a qualitative review and test of its relations with task and contextual performance”, Personnel Psychology, Vol. 64, pp. 89-136. Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit level organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel Psychology, 57, 61-94. Eisenberger,Fasolo, P., and Davis-LaMastro, V. (1990). “Perceived organizational support and employee diligence, commitment, and innovation.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 75: 51–9. Emerson, R. (1962), “Power-dependence relations”, American Sociological Review, Vol. 27 No. 1, pp. 31-41. Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., and Sowa, D. (1986). “Perceived organizational support.” “Journal of Applied Psychology,” 71: 500–7. Eisenberger,R., &Rhoades,L.(2002).Perceived Organizational Support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698-714. doi: 1037/0021-9010.87. 4.698. Green, S. B., Salkind, N., & Akey, T. (1997). Using SPSS for Windows: Analyzing and understanding data. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Hakanen, J.J., Perhoniemi, R. and Toppinen-Tanner, S. (2008), “Positive gain spirals at work: from job resources to work engagement, personal initiative and work-unit innovativeness”, Journal of Vocational Behaviour, Vol. 73, pp. 78-91. Homans, G.C. (1958), “Social behavior as exchange”, American Journal of Sociology, Vol. 63 No. 6, p. 31-41. Homans, G. (1961), Social Behaviour: Its Elementary Forms, Harcourt, Brace & World, New York, NY. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692-724. Maslach, C., Schaufelli, W.B. and Leiter, M.P. (2001), “Job burnout”, Annual Review of Psychology, Vol. 52, pp. 397-422. Matthewman,L.,Rose,A.,and Hetherington,A.(2009). Work psychology. New York; Oxford University Press. Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. USA: D.C. Heath and Company. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Paine, J. B., & Bachrach, D. G. (2000). Organizational citizenship behaviors: A critical review of the theoretical and empirical literature and suggestions for future research. Journal of Management, 26(3), 513-563. doi: 10.1177/014920630002600307. Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S.W. , Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122-141. doi: 10.1037/a0013079. Rhoades, L., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (2001). Affective commitment to the organization: The contribution of perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 825–836. Rhoades, L., and Eisenberger, R. (2002). “Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature.” Journal of Applied Psychology, 87: 698–714. Rich, B.L., Lepine, J.A. and Crawford, E.R. (2010), “Job engagement: antecedents and effects on job performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 53, pp. 617-35. Salanova, M., Agut, S. and Peiro, J.M. (2005), “Linking organizational resources and work engagement to employee performance and customer loyalty: the mediating role of service climate”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 90, pp. 1217-27. Schaufeli, W.B. and Bakker, A.B. (2004), “Job demands, job resources, and their relationship with burnout and engagement: a multi-sample study”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 25, pp. 293-315. Schaufeli, W.B., Salanova, M., Gonzalez-Roma, V. and Bakker, A.B. (2002), “The measurement of burnout and engagement: a confirmatory factor analytic approach”, Journal of Happiness Studies, Vol. 3, pp. 71-92. Schaufeli, W.B., Taris, T.W. and Bakker, A.B. (2006b), “Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde: on the differences between work engagement and workaholism”, in Burke, R.J. (Ed.), Research Companion to Working Time and Work Addiction, Edward Elgar, Northampton. Shore and Shore, T. H. (1995). “Perceived organizational support and organizational justice,” in R. S. Cropanzano and K. M. Kacmar (eds.), Organizational Politics, Justice, and Support: Managing the Social Climate of the Workplace (Westport, CT: Quorum), 149–64. Smith, C. A., Organ, D. W., & Near, J. P. 1983. Organizational citizenship behavior: Its nature and antecedents. Journal of Applied Psychology, 68: 655–663. Sonnentag, S. (2003), “Recovery, work engagement, and proactive behavior: a new look at the interface between nonwork and work”, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88, pp. 518-28. Xanthopoulou, D., Bakker, A.B., Demerouti, E. and Schaufeli, W.B. (2009), “Work engagement and financial returns: a diary study on the role of job and personal resources”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 82, pp. 183-200. Zachary, W.B. & Kuzuhara, L.W. 2005. Organizational behavior: Integrated models and applications. US: Thomson South-Western. |