Amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua sekolah menengah berprestasi tinggi dengan sekolah menengah berprestasi rendah di daerah Kota Setar Kedah Darul Aman

Amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua sekolah menengah berprestasi tinggi dengan sekolah menengah berprestasi rendah di daerah Kota Setar Kedah Darul Aman

The purpose of this study was to identify the difference between the instructional leadership as practised by school principals in high and low performing secondary schools in Kota Setar district. The research samples were consist of 296 teachers of both categorized schools involved in the study. T...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Mohd Zaini, Ismail
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2009
Subjects:
LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4263/1/s84949.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4263/2/s84949_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4263
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Sin, Ishak
topic LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Mohd Zaini, Ismail
Amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua sekolah menengah berprestasi tinggi dengan sekolah menengah berprestasi rendah di daerah Kota Setar Kedah Darul Aman
description The purpose of this study was to identify the difference between the instructional leadership as practised by school principals in high and low performing secondary schools in Kota Setar district. The research samples were consist of 296 teachers of both categorized schools involved in the study. The instrument used to measure the instructional leadership in this research was the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale (PIMRS) which was established by Hallinger dan Murphy (1987). The instruments were gathered, checked and analyzed with descriptive of percentage, mean, frequency and t-test analyses, through the Statistical Package for The Social Science (SPSS) version 15. Result indicated that there is a difference between the instructional leadership practised by the school principals in high and low performing secondary schools.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Mohd Zaini, Ismail
author_facet Mohd Zaini, Ismail
author_sort Mohd Zaini, Ismail
title Amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua sekolah menengah berprestasi tinggi dengan sekolah menengah berprestasi rendah di daerah Kota Setar Kedah Darul Aman
title_short Amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua sekolah menengah berprestasi tinggi dengan sekolah menengah berprestasi rendah di daerah Kota Setar Kedah Darul Aman
title_full Amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua sekolah menengah berprestasi tinggi dengan sekolah menengah berprestasi rendah di daerah Kota Setar Kedah Darul Aman
title_fullStr Amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua sekolah menengah berprestasi tinggi dengan sekolah menengah berprestasi rendah di daerah Kota Setar Kedah Darul Aman
title_full_unstemmed Amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua sekolah menengah berprestasi tinggi dengan sekolah menengah berprestasi rendah di daerah Kota Setar Kedah Darul Aman
title_sort amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua sekolah menengah berprestasi tinggi dengan sekolah menengah berprestasi rendah di daerah kota setar kedah darul aman
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2009
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4263/1/s84949.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4263/2/s84949_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827704488525824
spelling my-uum-etd.42632022-06-26T02:52:37Z Amalan kepimpinan instruksional pengetua sekolah menengah berprestasi tinggi dengan sekolah menengah berprestasi rendah di daerah Kota Setar Kedah Darul Aman 2009 Mohd Zaini, Ismail Sin, Ishak College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) College of Arts and Sciences LB2801-3095 School administration and organization The purpose of this study was to identify the difference between the instructional leadership as practised by school principals in high and low performing secondary schools in Kota Setar district. The research samples were consist of 296 teachers of both categorized schools involved in the study. The instrument used to measure the instructional leadership in this research was the Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale (PIMRS) which was established by Hallinger dan Murphy (1987). The instruments were gathered, checked and analyzed with descriptive of percentage, mean, frequency and t-test analyses, through the Statistical Package for The Social Science (SPSS) version 15. Result indicated that there is a difference between the instructional leadership practised by the school principals in high and low performing secondary schools. 2009 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4263/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4263/1/s84949.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4263/2/s84949_abstract.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000803855 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdullah Ismail (2001). Persepsi guru terhadap kepemimpinan pengajaran pengetua-pengetua sekolah menengah daerah Temerloh dan Bera. Tesis Sarjana Sains: Universiti Pertanian Malaysia. Abdul Shukur Abdullah (1995). Membina Sekolah Yang Berkesan: Aplikasi Dasar. Kertas Kerja Seminar Sekolah EfektiJ Kementerian Pendidikan Ma1aysia: Institut Aminuddin Baki. Abdul Shukur Abdullah (1988). Pengetua Berkesan: SekoIah Berkesan, Cabaran Pembangunan Sistem Pendidikan Negara. Kertas Kerja Seminar Kecemerlangan Sekolah-Sekolah Negeri Selangor Pada 15 Jun 1988 di Petaling Jaya Selangor. Abdul Shukur Abdullah. Tiga Teras Tingkat Martabat Pendidik, dalam Berita Harian, 16 Mei 2000. Ahmad Tajuddin Abd. Hamid (1989). Peranan pengetua dalam kepimpinan pengajaran. Disertasi Sarjana Pendidikan. Tidak di terbitkan: Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya. Andrew, R. L. (1987). On leadership and student achievement: a conversation with Richard Andrews. Educational Leadership. Andews, R. L., & Soder, R. (1986). Principal instructional leadership and student achievement. Instructional Leadership. Azlin Noraini Mansor (2004). Amalan pengurusan pengetua satu kajian kes. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. 1-18. Baharom Mohamad (2004). Persepsi guru-guru terhadap kepimpinan pengajaran dalam celik komputer di sekolah-sekolah negeri Johor. Tesis Ph.D. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Baharom Mohamad (1998). Persepsi guru-guru terhadap kepemimpinan pengajaran pengetua sekolah harapan negara di negeri Johor: Satu Tinjauan. Tesis Sarjana. Skudai: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Bass, Bernand M, (1990). Basa and Stodgill's handbook of Leadership Theory, Research and Managerial Applications New York, the Free Press. Bass B.M (1981): StodgillHs Handbook of Leadership. The Free Press. New York Basset, G. W., Creme, A. R. & Walker, W. G. (1974). Headmaster For Better School. St. Lucia: University Queensland Press. Bevoise, W.D. (1984). " Synthesis on The Principal as Instructional Leadership". Educational Leadership. hlm 15-20. Blake, J. A. & Champion, D. J. (1976). Method and Issues in Social Research. New York: John Willey and Sons. Blum berg, A., & Greenfield, W. (1980). The Effective Principal Perspectives on School Leadership. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Bossert, S. T., Dwyer, D. C., Rowen, B., & Lee, G. V. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly. 18(3): 35-64. Brandt, R. (1987). On the leadership and student achievement: A conversation with richard andrews. Educational Leadership. 45. 5-16. Burns, James MacGregor, (1978). Leadership. New York, Harper Colophon Books. Chan Yau Chi (1992). A study of the principals instructional leadership. Educations/Leadership. 54-61. Cogan, M., Anderson, R.H, & Krajewski, R. (1993) Clinical Supervision: Special Methods for The sepervision of Teachers (3rd ed). Fort Worth, TX : Harcourt Brace. Cotton, S., & Saward, J. (1980). Instructional Leadership Behaviour. dlm. Jean Brown & Bruce Sheppard. Leadership And Practice Education . Memorial University Of Newfoundland. http://www.stemnet.nf.calbsheppard/Unit4e.html (20 Mei 1996). Davis, J.A (1971). Elementary Survey Analisis. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall DeBevoise, W. (1984). Synthesis Of Research On The Principal As Instructional Leader. Education Leadership. Drake, D.L dan Roe, W.H (1986). The Principalship (2 ed). New York : Random House. Druckers, P. (1969). The Practice of Management. New York: Harper and Row. Duke, D.L. (1987). School Leadership and Instructional Improvement. New York: Random House. Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective School for The Urban Poor. Educational Leadership 40(3), hlm. 4-11. Edmonds, R. (1978). Search Of Effective Schools. The Identification and Analysis of city Schools : Are Instructionally Effective For Poor Children. Harvard University: Center For Urban Study. Findley, B. & Findley, D. (1992). Effective schools: The role of the principal. Contemporary Education. 63(2): 102-104. Fullan, M. (1979). Research in curiculum and instructional implomentation. Review of Educational Research. 47(4): 569-582. Glasman, N. S. (1986). "Evaluation-Based Leadership: School Administration In Contemporary Perspective." Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Glickman, C.D. (1985). Supervision of Instruction: A Developmental approach. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Gordon, S.P. (1997). Has The Field of Supervision Evolved to A Point That It Should Be Called Something Else? In J. Glanz & R.E Neville (Eds) Education Supervision: Perspective, Issues, and Controversies (pp 114-123). Norwood, MA: Christopher Gordon. Greenfield, W. (1987). Instructional Leadership: Concepts, Issues and Controversies. Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon, Inc. 139-152. Hallinger, P. (1992). The elvolving role of american principals: From managerial to instructional and transformational leaders. Journal of Educational Administration. 30(3): 35-48. Hallinger, P., Murphy, J.F.(1985).Assessing the Instructional Management Behavior of Principals. Elementary school Journal, Jilid 86, hlm 19-50. Hallinger, P., Murphy, J., Lester, F. K., & Linn, R.L. (1987) lnstructional leadership: What an instructional leader does? Peabody Journal of Education. Hallinger, P., Murphy, J.F., Weil, M., Mega, R.P., dan Mitman. A. (1983). School Effectiveness: ldentifying the Specific Practices, Behavior for Principals, "NASSP Bulletin, 67(463), hlm 83-91. Hallinger, P., & Taraseina, P. (2001). The principal's role as instructional leader: a review of studies using the principal instructional management rating scale. Paperpresented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle. Halpin, A. W. (1966). Theory And Research In Education. New York: Macmillan. Hanafi Kamal (1980). An Identification of The Desirable Behavior Domains Of The Secondary School Principalship In Malaysia. Tesis Ph.D.: Ohio University. Harris, B.M. (1997). Altering Harrot of Supervision Through Creative Leadership. Educational Leadership, 34(8) hlm 567-571. Hersey, P. Blanchard, K.H. (1982). Leadership Style, Attitudes and Behaviour. Training And Development Journal, v35 n5 p50-52. Hoy, W.K. and Miskel. C.G (1982). Educational Administration: Theory Research and Practice. New York: Random House. Hoy, W. K., & Woolfolk, A.E. (1993). Teacher's sense of efficacy and the organizational health of shools. Elementary School Journal. 93(4): 355-372. Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2001). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. 6th Edition. New York: McGraw-Hill. Hussein Mahmood (1993), Kepimpinan dan Keberkesanan Sekolah. Kuala Lumpur:DBP. Jefri Hamid (2004). Kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua guru-besar dan kepuasan guru. Disertasi Sarjana Pendidikan: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Kamus Dewan. (1994). Edisi Baru. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (1987). Pekeliling Ikhtisas Bi1.3/87: Penyeliaan Pengajaran Pembelajaran Di Dalam Kelas Oleh Pengetua/Guru Besar Sekolah. KP(BS) 85911ll(77). Krejcie, R., & Morgan, D. (1970). Determining Sample Size for Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 30: 607-610. Kroeze, D.J. (1983). Effective Principals as instructional Leader: Now Direction for Research. Administrators Notebook, 30(a) hlm. 1-4 Lau Ki Chuan (2000). Tinjauan amalan faktor-faktor pengurusan sekolah beskesan dalam menentukan tahap pengurusan sekolah di sebuah sekolah menengah dalam daerah Batu Pahat, Johor. Tesis Sarjana: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Leithwood, K. A., Begley, P.T., & Cousins, J.B. (1994). DeveIoping Expert Leadership for Future Schools. The Palmer Press, London. Leithwood, K. A., & Montgomery, D. J. (1986). Improving Principal Efiectiveness: The Principal Pro$le. Toronto: OISE Press. Manoharan Letchumaran (1995). Persepsi guru terhadap kepemimpinan pengajaran pengetua dalam mempengaruhi akademik pelajar di sekolah menengah dalam kawasan bandaraya ipoh. Tesis Sarjana Muda Pendidikan. Tidak diterbitkan: Universiti Utara Malaysia. Mohd. Majid Konting (2000). Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohd. Najib Abdul Ghafar (2001). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Skudai: Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Mohd. Rosli Mohd. Othman (2000). Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional dengan iklim sekolah. Tesis Sarjana: Universi ti Teknologi Malaysia. Mohd. Shaffie Ahmad (1995). Metodologi Penyelidikan Untuk Bidang Ekonomi dan Bidang-bidang Berkaitan. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Munira Mohsin (2000). Persepsi guru terhadap amalan konsep kepimpinan pengajaran di kalangan pentadbir ke arah sekolah berkesan. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan: Universiti Putra Malaysia. Murphy, J.F, & Hallinger, P., Weil, M. dan Mitman, A. (1983). "Academic Press:Translating High Expectations in School Policies and Classroom Practice". Educational Leadership. Murphy, J. F., Halingger, P., Weil, M., & Mitman, A. (1984). Instructional Leadership: A Conceptual Framework. Education Digest. 28-31. Nasirah Binti Muin (2000). Kepemimpinan pengajaran ke arah kecemerlangan pencapaian akademik di sekolah menengah daerah Gombak Selangor. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan. Tidak diterbitkan: Universiti Malaya. Norsilawati Yusof (1998). Keberkesanan kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua dalam mempengaruhi prestasi akademik pelajar dari persepsi guru (satu kajian perbandingan). Tesis Sarjana.Skudai:Universiti Teknologi Malaysia Pajak, E (1989). Indentification of Supervisory Proficiencies Project. Alexandria, VA: ASCD. Peterson, K. D. (1987). Administrative Control And Instructional Leadership. dlm. Greenfield, W. (pnyt). Instructional Leadership: Concepts, Issues, And Controversie. Boston: Allyn and Bacon, Inc. 139-152. Rallis, S.E, dan Highsmith, M.C. (1986). The Myth of the "Great Principal". Question of the School Management and Instructional Leadership. Phi Delta Kappan, 68, hlm 300-304. Rahi mah Ahmad. (2002). Kepemimpinan Sekolah Dalam Menghadapi Millenium Baru. Institut Pengetua. Bangi: Universiti Malaya. Ramaiah, A. L (1992). Kepimpinan Pengajaran : Cabaran Masa Kini. Petaling Jaya. IBS Buku Sdn Bhd. Ramaiah, A.L. (1995). Pengurusan sekolah-sekolah keperluan memperkukuhkan dimensi kepimpinan. Jurnal Pendidikan, Institut Aminudin Baki, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 39: 89-96. Reitzug, U.C, & Cross, B (1993). Deconstructing Principal Instructional Leadership: From "Super" Vision to Critical Collaboration. Paper presented at the annual conferences of the University Council for Education Administration Huston, TX. Rohana Salam (2002). Peranan pengetua sebagai pemimpin pengajaran: kajian di sekolah di daerah Pontian, Johor. Tesis Sarjana Kepengetuaan. Bangi: Universiti Malaya. Rowe, K. J., Hill, P.W., Homlmes & Smith, P. (1995). Multilevel Modelling in School Effectiveness research: How many level?. Paper presented at the international congress for school effectiveness and improvement, Melbourne. Rutherford, W. L. (1 985). School Principals As Effective Leaders. Indiana: The Phi Delta Kappa Educational Foundation. 67(1): 31-34. Sala, F. 2002. Emotional Competence Inventory (ECI): Technical Manual. HayGroup: McClelland Center for Research and Innovation. Schon, D.A .(1988)Coaching Reflective Teaching. In P.P Grimmett & G.E Erickson (Eds), Reflection in Teacher Education (pp 19-30), New York: Teacher College Press. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1991). Constructing and changing theories of practice: The key to preparing school administrators. Urban Review. 23: 39-49. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1967). Factors Which Effect Satisfaction and Dissatisfaction of Teachers. Journal of Educational Administration 5, 66-83. Sergiovanni, T. J. (1987). The Principalship: A Reflective Practice Perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon Inc. Shafari Mohamed Nor (2001). Kajian Amalan Kepemimpinan Pengajaran Pengetua Dari Persepsi Pengetua dan Guru Sekolah Menengah Di Kuala Pilah. Tesis Sarjana Sains: Universiti Putra Malaysia. Shahril @ Charil Marzuki (2000). Pendidikan di Malaysia masa kini. Kertas Kerja Seminar Pendidikan. Universiti Malaya. 15 April. Shahrom Sukari (1999). Persepsi Guru-guru Terhadap Kepimpinan Pengajaran Pengetua Sepatut dan Sebenar Di Sebuah Sekolah Menengah Daerah Kulai. Tesis Sarjana: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Short, P. M. & Spencer, W.A. 1990. Principal instructional leadership. Journal of Research and Development in Education. Smith, W., dan Andrew, R. (1989).Instructional Leadership: How principals Make a Difference. Alexandria, VA: Association for supervision and Curriculum Development. Smyth, J (1997). 1st Supervision More Than the Surveillance of Instruction ? In J. Glanz & R.F Neville (Eds), Educational Supervision: Perspectives, Issues and Controversies (pp 286-295). Nonvood, MA : Christopher-Gordon. Southworth, G, (2002). Instructional Leadership in Schools : Reflections and Emphirical Evidence. School Leadership and Management. 22(1), 73-91 Sweeney, J. (1982). Research synthesis on effective school leadership. Educational Leadership. 39(5): 346-452. Synder, K. J. (1983). Instructional leadership for productive schools. Educational Leadership. Febuari. 32-37. Tschannen-Moran, M., & Woolfolk-Hoy, W. K. (2001). Teacher Efficacy: Capturing and Exclusive Construct. Teaching and Teacher Educational. 17: 783-805. Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership In Organizations. 3rd Edition. NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc. Wan Mohd Zahid Wan Nordin (1993). Wawasan Pendidikan: Agenda Pengisian: Kuala Lumpur: Nurin Enterprise. Wang, M. C., Heartel, G. D., & Walberg, H. J. (1990). What influence learning? A content analysis of review literature. Journal of Educational Reserch. 84(1): 30-43. Wellisch, J. B. (1978). School management and organization in successful schools. Sociology Of Education. 51: 211-216. Zainudin Hassan (2000). Tabiat membaca bahan ilmiah bercetak di kalangan staf akademik Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Zulkafli Arifin, (2000). Pengaruh kepimpinan prestasi pengetua terhadap prestasi akademik pelajar: Satu tinjauan di sekolah-sekolah menengah. Tesis Sarjana: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.

Similar Items