Hubungan gaya kepimpinan berkhidmat pengetua-pengetua cemerlang dengan kepuasan kerja guru sekolah-sekolah menengah di Daerah Kuala Krai

Hubungan gaya kepimpinan berkhidmat pengetua-pengetua cemerlang dengan kepuasan kerja guru sekolah-sekolah menengah di Daerah Kuala Krai

The main purpose of this research is to find out the relationship between the leadership style of serving with the Excellent Principal and the satisfaction of teachers' work among the secondary school teachers in the district of Kuala Krai, Kelantan. The leadership style of serving with the Exc...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ab Ghani, Mohd Razi
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2011
Subjects:
LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4305/1/s801879.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4305/2/s801879_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4305
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Mustafa, Ismail
topic LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Ab Ghani, Mohd Razi
Hubungan gaya kepimpinan berkhidmat pengetua-pengetua cemerlang dengan kepuasan kerja guru sekolah-sekolah menengah di Daerah Kuala Krai
description The main purpose of this research is to find out the relationship between the leadership style of serving with the Excellent Principal and the satisfaction of teachers' work among the secondary school teachers in the district of Kuala Krai, Kelantan. The leadership style of serving with the Excellent Principal is being analyzed using Server Leadership Assessment Instrument (SLAI) by Robert S. Dennis (2005) and the satisfaction of teachers' work is being analyzed using the Teaching Satisfaction Scale (TSS) by Wing-Tung Au (2006). The data collected from 170 respondents through the five-point scale questionnaire. Then, the data is being analyzed using SPSS Version 12.0. Four main hypotheses have been tested using the Pearson Correlation, T-Test and ANOVA. The findings of research show that there are significant positive relationship between the leadership construct of serving with Excellent Principal and the satisfaction of teachers' work. Ho1 Relationship between the leadership of serving with Excellent Principal and the satisfaction of teachers' work based on gender, free T-sample test is not significant t(168) = 0.19, p>0.5). Ho2 Relationship between the leadership of serving with Excellent Principal and the satisfaction of teachers' work based on age using the ANOVA Test, F(3, 116) = 1.16, P > 0.05). Ho 3 Relationship between the leadership of serving with Excellent Principal and the satisfaction of teachers' work based on the period of time served with the current Principal using the ANOVA Test F(4, 170) = 1.06, p0.05) and Ho4 Relationship between the leadership of Excellent Principal and the satisfaction of teachers' work using the Pearson Correlation (r=. 21, p< .05) shows that there is positive and significant relationship.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Ab Ghani, Mohd Razi
author_facet Ab Ghani, Mohd Razi
author_sort Ab Ghani, Mohd Razi
title Hubungan gaya kepimpinan berkhidmat pengetua-pengetua cemerlang dengan kepuasan kerja guru sekolah-sekolah menengah di Daerah Kuala Krai
title_short Hubungan gaya kepimpinan berkhidmat pengetua-pengetua cemerlang dengan kepuasan kerja guru sekolah-sekolah menengah di Daerah Kuala Krai
title_full Hubungan gaya kepimpinan berkhidmat pengetua-pengetua cemerlang dengan kepuasan kerja guru sekolah-sekolah menengah di Daerah Kuala Krai
title_fullStr Hubungan gaya kepimpinan berkhidmat pengetua-pengetua cemerlang dengan kepuasan kerja guru sekolah-sekolah menengah di Daerah Kuala Krai
title_full_unstemmed Hubungan gaya kepimpinan berkhidmat pengetua-pengetua cemerlang dengan kepuasan kerja guru sekolah-sekolah menengah di Daerah Kuala Krai
title_sort hubungan gaya kepimpinan berkhidmat pengetua-pengetua cemerlang dengan kepuasan kerja guru sekolah-sekolah menengah di daerah kuala krai
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2011
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4305/1/s801879.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4305/2/s801879_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827709734551552
spelling my-uum-etd.43052022-04-10T23:03:42Z Hubungan gaya kepimpinan berkhidmat pengetua-pengetua cemerlang dengan kepuasan kerja guru sekolah-sekolah menengah di Daerah Kuala Krai 2011 Ab Ghani, Mohd Razi Mustafa, Ismail College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) College of Arts and Sciences LB2801-3095 School administration and organization The main purpose of this research is to find out the relationship between the leadership style of serving with the Excellent Principal and the satisfaction of teachers' work among the secondary school teachers in the district of Kuala Krai, Kelantan. The leadership style of serving with the Excellent Principal is being analyzed using Server Leadership Assessment Instrument (SLAI) by Robert S. Dennis (2005) and the satisfaction of teachers' work is being analyzed using the Teaching Satisfaction Scale (TSS) by Wing-Tung Au (2006). The data collected from 170 respondents through the five-point scale questionnaire. Then, the data is being analyzed using SPSS Version 12.0. Four main hypotheses have been tested using the Pearson Correlation, T-Test and ANOVA. The findings of research show that there are significant positive relationship between the leadership construct of serving with Excellent Principal and the satisfaction of teachers' work. Ho1 Relationship between the leadership of serving with Excellent Principal and the satisfaction of teachers' work based on gender, free T-sample test is not significant t(168) = 0.19, p>0.5). Ho2 Relationship between the leadership of serving with Excellent Principal and the satisfaction of teachers' work based on age using the ANOVA Test, F(3, 116) = 1.16, P > 0.05). Ho 3 Relationship between the leadership of serving with Excellent Principal and the satisfaction of teachers' work based on the period of time served with the current Principal using the ANOVA Test F(4, 170) = 1.06, p0.05) and Ho4 Relationship between the leadership of Excellent Principal and the satisfaction of teachers' work using the Pearson Correlation (r=. 21, p< .05) shows that there is positive and significant relationship. 2011 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4305/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4305/1/s801879.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4305/2/s801879_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abu Bakar Hashim. (1985). An analysis of job satisfaction among academic staff of university in Malaysia. Disertasi Ph.D. Ohio University. Agho, A., Mueller, C.Y. & Price, J. (1993). Determinants of employee job satisfaction: An empirical test of a causal model, Human Relations, 46, 1007-1027. Ahmad Mahdzan, A (1983). Kaedah penyelidikan sosioekonomi: Satu pengenalan. Kuala Lumpur: DBP. Al Ramaiah. (1999). Kepimpinan pendidikan: Cabaran masa kini. Petaling Jaya: IBS Buku Sdn.Bhd. Aminuddin Mohd Yusuf. (1990). Kepimpinan: Satu Analisa Psikologi. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Andersen, J. A. (2009a). When a servant-leader comes knocking....Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(1), 4-15. Andersen, J. A. (2009b). Your favourite manager is an organizational disaster. European Business Review, 21(1), 5-16. Anderson, K. P. (2005). A correlational analysis of servant leadership and job satisfaction in a religious educational organization. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Phoenix. Ary, D, Jacobs, L.C. & Razaviech, A (2002). Introduction to research in education (6th ed) USA: Waldsworth Group, pp 72-85. Badril Anuar Su. (2009). A study of job satisfaction among teachers. Unpublished masters thesis. University Utara Malaysia. Blanchard, K. (1991). Servant leadership. The Blanchard Management Report. Retrieved February 3, 2010, from http://www.guidepostbooks. com/. Bolman, L.G. , & Deal, T.E. (1992). Leading and Managing: Effect of context, culture and gender. Educational Administration Quartely, 28, ms. 3 14-329. Cerit, Y. (2009). The effects of servant leadership behaviours of school principals on teachers' job satisfaction. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 37(5), 600-623. Davis, M. E. (2009). The association between change styles and job satisfaction among the teachers working in international schools. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Southern Queensland. Dennis R.S., & Bocarnea, M. (2005). Development of the servent leadership Assesment Instrument. Leadership and Organization Development Journal, 26(8), 600-615. Denton, E. M. (2009). Teachers' perception of how the leadership styles and practices of principals influence their job satisfaction and retention. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Liberty University. Dimmock, C, (1999). Principals and school restructuring:conceptualizing challenges as dilemmas. Journal of Educational Administration. Drury, S. (2004). Employee perception of servant leadership: Comparisons by level and with job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Regent University. Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective School for The Urban. Educational Leadership. 37(1), ms. 15-24. Education Department of Kelantan (2011). Statistik Guru 2011. Retrieved January 10, 2011, from http://www.ipnkelantan.com. Greenleaf, R.K. (1977). Servant leadership : A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness (251h Ed.). New Jersey: Paulist Press. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., Snyderman, B.B. (2004). The motivation to work (7th Ed.). New Jersey: Transaction Publishers. Hulpia, H., Devos, G., & Rosseel, Y. (2009). The relationship between the perception of distributed leadership in secondary schools and teachers and teacher leaders' job satisfaction and organizational commitment, School Effective and School Improvement, 20(3), 291-317. Hollway, W. (1991). Workpsychololy and organizational behaviour. Managing the Individual at work. London: Sage. House, R.J. (1996). Path-goal theory of leadership : lessons, legacy, and a reformulated theory. Leadership Quarterly, 7(3), 323-352. Hoy, W.K. & Miskel, C.G. (1996). Educational Administration Theory Research, and Practice. New York, Ny,: Mc Graw Hill.Inc. Hoy, W .K. & Miskel, C .G. (2005). Education administration: Theory, research and practice. New York: Random House. Hussein Mahmood. (l993). Kepemimpinan dan kebekesanan sekolah. Kuala Lumpur. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Hoppock, R. (1935). Effectiveness and quality of school. In Hoy, W.K., Miskel, C.G. Educational administration: Theory, research and practice. New York: Random House. Ibrahim bin Mamat, (1993). Kepimpinan sekolah: teori untuk para praktis. Kuala lumpur: Kumpulan Budiman Sdn. Bhd. lsmail Mustafa (2008). Kepimpinan pendidikan: Teori Jan amalan. Jitra, Kedah: PH Enterprise. Juhari Ali. (1987). Asas Pengumsan (edisi awal). Pulau Pinang: Penerbitan Universiti Sains Malaysia. Jenkins, M. & Stewart, A.C. (2010). The importance of a servant leader orientation. Health Care Munagement Review. 35(1), 46-54. Johnson, L.R. (2008). An exploratory study of servant leadership, emotional intelligence, and job satisfaction among high-tech employee. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Phoenix. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (1990). Laporan jawatankuasa mengkaji taraf pelajaran di sekolah-sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Kerlinger, F. (1973). Foundation of behavioural research (2nded.). New York: HoH, Rinahart and Winston. Klein, S. & Ritti, R. (1984). Understanding Organisational Behaviour. Kent Publishing Company, Boston. Laub, J.A. (1999). Assessing the servant organization: Development of the servant organizational leadership assessment (SOLA) instrument. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Florida Atlantic University. Laub, J. (2004). Defining servant leadership : A recommendation typology for servant leadership studies. Servant Leadership Roundtable. Retrieved July 20, 2010, from http://www.regentuniversityonline.com/acad/global/ publications/sl_proceedings/2004/laub-defining-servant.pdf. Lok, P., & Crawford, J. (2004) The effect of organizational culture and leadership style on job satisfaction and organizational commitment: A cross-national comparison Journal of Management Development, 23(4), 321-338. Lunenberg, F.C & Ornstein, A.C. (2000). Educational Administration Concepts and Practices, Third edition, Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Thomson Learning. Maslow, A.H. (2000). The Maslow business reader (Ed). Deborah, C. Stephens. Canada John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Mckee, J.G. (1991). Leadership styles of community college faculty job satisfaction. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 15(1), 33-46. Mohd. Majid Konting (1990). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: DBP. Mohamad Nazar Mohamed (1990). Pengantar Psikologi. Satu Pengenalan Asas kepada jiwa dan tingkahlaku manusia. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Nik Mutasim. (2001). Employee involvement in Malaysia issues and challenges: A case of employee share option scheme, di Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Ogbodo, C. M. and A. I. Ekpo. (2005). Principals' Managerial Effectiveness and Teachers' Work Performance in Akwa-lbom state secondary schools. Delsu Journal of Educational Research and Development, 4(1). ms. 62-73. Owens, R.G. (1995). Organizational Behaviour in Education, 5th edition. Needham Heights. MA: Allyn And Bacon. Page, D., & Wong, P.T.P. (2000). A conceptual framework for measuring servant- leadership. Retrieved January 2, 2010, from http://www:/twu.ca/academics/graduate/leadership/servant-leadership/conceptual-framework.pdf. Patterson, K. (2003). Servant Leadership : A theoretical model. Servant Leadership Rountable. Retrieved September 1, 2010, from http://www.regent.edu/acad/sls/publications/conference_ proceedings/servant_leadership_rountable/2005pdf/spears_ practice.pdf. Rad, A.M.M., & Yarmohammadian, M.H. (2006). A study of relationship between managers' leadership style and employees' job satisfaction. Leadership in Health Services, 19(2), xi-xxviii. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business, A skill building approach (2nd edition). Southern Illnois University Of Carbondale. Sergiovanni, T. J. 1995. The principalship: a reflective practice perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Shahril Marzuki (1997). Profil Sekolah berkesan di Malaysia berdasarkan Model lima Faktor Jurnal Pendidikan Jilid 18. Kuala Lumpur: Falkuti Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya. Singh, I, (1984). The effect of headmaster's leadership on teacher job satisfaction and morale as perceived by teacher in Nepal. Tesis Ph.D. Tidak diterbitkan. Columbia University College. United State of America. Skaalvik, E.M., & Skaalvik, S. (2009). Does school context matter? relation with teacher burnout and job satisfaction. An International Journal of Research and Studies, 25, 518-524. Smith, W.and R. Andrews. (1989). Instructional Leadership: How Principals Make a Diference. Alexandria, V.A: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Spears, L. C. (2005). The understanding and practice of servant-leadership. Servant Leadership Rountable. Retrieved September 1, 2010, from http://www.regent.edu/acad/sls/ publications/conference_proceedings/servant_leadership_ rountable/2003pdf/patterson_servant_leadership.pdf. Spears, L. C. (2006). On character and servant-leadership : Ten characteristics of effective, caring Leaders. Servant Leadership Roundtable. Retrieved February 2, 2010, from http://www.greenleaf.org/leadership/read-about-it/article/ On-Character-and-Servant-Leader. Spector, P.E (1996). Industrial And Organizational Psycology: Research And Paratice. NewYork: John Wiley & Sons, inc. Svoboda, S.N. (2008). A correlational study of servant leadership and elementary principal job satisfaction in Ohio public school districts. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Northcentral University. Sweeney, J. (1982). Research Synthesis On Effective School Leadership, Educational Leadership, Vol 39(5), Feb 1982, ms. 346-352. Washington, R. R. (2007). Empirical relationships among servant, transformational, and transactional leadership: Similarities, differences, and correlations with job satisfaction and organizational commitment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Auburn University. West, G.R.B., & Mihai, B. (2008). servant leadership & organisational outcomes: Relationships in U.S and Filipino higher educational settings. Retrieved February 2, 2010, from Wexley, K.N. & Yukl, G.A. (1984). Organizational behavior and personnel Psychology, Illinois: Homewood. Wing-Tung Au. (2006). Teaching Satisfaction Scale. Measuring Job Satisfaction of Teachers. Educational and Psychological Measurement, Volume 66 Number 1. Yukl, G. (1989) Leadership in organizations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall. Zembylas, M., & Papanastasiou, E. (2004). Teacher job satisfaction in Cyprus: The result of a mixed-methods approach. Journal of Education Administration, 42, 357-374.

Similar Items