Exploring reflective practice among university English teachers in Yemen: A case study
Reflection is an important teaching tool for teachers in higher education. By reflecting on the teaching performance, teachers can make sense of reflection for professional development and meaningful teaching and learning. Given that beliefs and practices are important components of reflective pr...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | eng eng |
Published: |
2014
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://etd.uum.edu.my/4497/1/s91185.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4497/2/s91185_abstract.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my-uum-etd.4497 |
---|---|
record_format |
uketd_dc |
institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
collection |
UUM ETD |
language |
eng eng |
advisor |
Harun, Minah |
topic |
LB Theory and practice of education |
spellingShingle |
LB Theory and practice of education Ahmed, Waleed Mohammed Abdullah Exploring reflective practice among university English teachers in Yemen: A case study |
description |
Reflection is an important teaching tool for teachers in higher education. By reflecting
on the teaching performance, teachers can make sense of reflection for professional
development and meaningful teaching and learning. Given that beliefs and practices are
important components of reflective practice, more in-depth understanding of how teachers engage in reflection needs to be explored. Previous studies mainly focused on teacher‟s beliefs about reflection. However, little is known about how reflection is currently practiced among the university English teachers in Yemen. This study explores how reflection is practiced at one private university in Yemen by employing a qualitative case study method to gain insights into the phenomenon. Data were collected through a multipronged research approach including semi-structured interviews, semistructured classroom observations, journal entry and focus group discussions. Five teachers with ten-years of teaching experience were purposively selected as the key informants. Six to ten students taught by every informant took part in the focus group discussions. Data were analyzed using a coding scheme. The findings indicate that the teachers engaged in various levels, types and patterns of reflection. The multifaceted elements of reflection revealed that teachers‟ reflection was caused by two types of factors namely enabling and constraining factors. The study demonstrates that teachers need to constantly engage in formal, regular and collaborative reflection with students, colleagues, and administrators for professional development. The study provides several implications. Theoretically, the study leads to a critical awareness of the different layers of reflection. Practically, it gives teachers, administrators and decision-makers in-depth
information about effective reflective practice, in particular, its process and relevance to teacher education. Methodologically, other studies can employ a similar approach to understand any complex phenomena related to teaching and learning. Further research studies are required to explore the roles of university administrators and policy makers in promoting effective reflection. |
format |
Thesis |
qualification_name |
Ph.D. |
qualification_level |
Doctorate |
author |
Ahmed, Waleed Mohammed Abdullah |
author_facet |
Ahmed, Waleed Mohammed Abdullah |
author_sort |
Ahmed, Waleed Mohammed Abdullah |
title |
Exploring reflective practice among university English teachers in Yemen: A case study |
title_short |
Exploring reflective practice among university English teachers in Yemen: A case study |
title_full |
Exploring reflective practice among university English teachers in Yemen: A case study |
title_fullStr |
Exploring reflective practice among university English teachers in Yemen: A case study |
title_full_unstemmed |
Exploring reflective practice among university English teachers in Yemen: A case study |
title_sort |
exploring reflective practice among university english teachers in yemen: a case study |
granting_institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
granting_department |
Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences |
publishDate |
2014 |
url |
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4497/1/s91185.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4497/2/s91185_abstract.pdf |
_version_ |
1776103649652506624 |
spelling |
my-uum-etd.44972023-04-02T00:33:58Z Exploring reflective practice among university English teachers in Yemen: A case study 2014 Ahmed, Waleed Mohammed Abdullah Harun, Minah Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB Theory and practice of education Reflection is an important teaching tool for teachers in higher education. By reflecting on the teaching performance, teachers can make sense of reflection for professional development and meaningful teaching and learning. Given that beliefs and practices are important components of reflective practice, more in-depth understanding of how teachers engage in reflection needs to be explored. Previous studies mainly focused on teacher‟s beliefs about reflection. However, little is known about how reflection is currently practiced among the university English teachers in Yemen. This study explores how reflection is practiced at one private university in Yemen by employing a qualitative case study method to gain insights into the phenomenon. Data were collected through a multipronged research approach including semi-structured interviews, semistructured classroom observations, journal entry and focus group discussions. Five teachers with ten-years of teaching experience were purposively selected as the key informants. Six to ten students taught by every informant took part in the focus group discussions. Data were analyzed using a coding scheme. The findings indicate that the teachers engaged in various levels, types and patterns of reflection. The multifaceted elements of reflection revealed that teachers‟ reflection was caused by two types of factors namely enabling and constraining factors. The study demonstrates that teachers need to constantly engage in formal, regular and collaborative reflection with students, colleagues, and administrators for professional development. The study provides several implications. Theoretically, the study leads to a critical awareness of the different layers of reflection. Practically, it gives teachers, administrators and decision-makers in-depth information about effective reflective practice, in particular, its process and relevance to teacher education. Methodologically, other studies can employ a similar approach to understand any complex phenomena related to teaching and learning. Further research studies are required to explore the roles of university administrators and policy makers in promoting effective reflection. 2014 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4497/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4497/1/s91185.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4497/2/s91185_abstract.pdf text eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Abhakorn, J. L. M. (2014). Investigating the use of student portfolios to develop students' metacognition in English as a foreign language learning. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(1), 46-55. doi: 10.4304/jltr.5.1.46-55. Akbari, R. (2007). Reflections on reflection: A critical appraisal of reflective practices in L2 teacher education. System, 35, 192–207. Akbari, R., Behzadpoor, F., & Dadvand, B. (2010). Development of English language teaching reflection inventory. System, 38, 211-227. Alexander, P. A., & Dochy, F. J. R. C. (1995). Conceptions of knowledge and beliefs: A comparison across varying cultural and educational communities. American Educational Research Journal, 32(2), 413-442. Allwright, D. (1983). Classroom-centred research on language teaching and learning: A brief historical overview. TESOL Quarterly, 17 (2), 191-204. Amobi, F. (2005). Turning the focus on ourselves: teacher education professors‟ reflectivity on their own teaching. Reflective Practice, 6(2), 311-318. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1974). Theory in practice: Increasing professional effectiveness. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Argyris, C., Putnam, R., & McLain Smith, D. (1985). Action science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Ashcroft, K., & Palacio, D. (2003). Introduction to the primary school curriculum. In K. Ashcroft & D. Palacio (Eds.) Implementing the primary curriculum: A teacher’s guide. Bristol: Falmer Press, Taylor & Francis Inc. Asselin, M. E. (2003). Insider research: Issues to consider when doing qualitative research in your own setting. Journal for Nurses in Staff Development, 19(2), 99-103. Association of American Colleges and Universities. (2002). Greater expectations: A new vision for learning as a nation goes to college. Washington, D.C.: Association of American Colleges & Universities. Bailey, K. (1997). Reflective teaching: Situating our stories. Asian Journal of English Language Teaching, 7, 1-19. Bailey, K., Bergthold, B., Braunstein, B., Fleischman, N., Holbrook, M., Tuman, J., Waissbluth, X., & Zambo, L. (1996). The language teacher's autobiography: Examining the apprenticeship of observation. In D. Freeman & J. Richards (Eds.), Teacher learning in language teaching (pp. 11-29). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Baker, P., & Ellece, S. (2011). Key terms in discourse analysis. NY: Continuum. Barr, R., & Tagg, J. (1995). From teaching to learning: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change, November/December, 13-25. Barry, B. (1996). Reflecting on reflective practice. Studies in the Education of Adults, 28(2), 162-184. Benaquisto, L. (2008). Codes and coding. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vols. 1 & 2) (pp. 85–88). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Biggs, J. (2003). Teaching for quality learning at university: What the student does (2nd ed.). Berkshire: SRHE & Open University Press. Blatter, J. K. (2008). Case study. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vols. 1 & 2) (pp. 68-71). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. (1992). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Boice, R. (1992). The new faculty member: Supporting and fostering professional development. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Borg, S., & Al-Busaidi, S. (2012). Learner autonomy: English language teachers’ beliefs and practices. London: British Council. Borgen, W. A., Amundson, N. E., & Butterfield, L. D. (2008). Critical Incident Technique. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vols. 1 & 2) (pp. 158–159). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Boud, D., Keogh, R., & Walker, D. (1985). Reflection: Turning experience into learning. London: Croom Helm. Boud, D., & Walker, D. (1998). Promoting reflection in professional courses: The challenge of context. Studies in Higher Education, 23, 191-206. Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137–152. Brookfield, S. (1995). Becoming a critically reflective teacher. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Butler, J. (1996). Professional development: Practice as text, reflection as process and self as locus. Australian Journal of Education, 4(3), 265-283. Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 709-725). New York: Macmillan. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2001). Beyond certainty: Taking an inquiry stance on practice. In A. Lieberman & L. Miller (Eds.), Teachers caught in the action: Professional development that matters (pp. 45-58). New York: Teachers College Press. Cohen, L. Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. New York: Routledge. Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Creswell, J., Hanson, W., Clark, V., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counselling Psychologist, 35(2), 236-264. Crook, D. (2012). Teacher education as a field of historical research: retrospect and prospect, History of Education: Journal of the History of Education Society, 41(1),57-72. Dant, T. (2003). Critical social theory: Culture, society and critique. London: SAGE Darling-Hammond, L., & McLaughlin, M. (1996). Policies that support professional development in an era of reform. In M. McLaughlin, & I. Oberman (Eds.), Teacher learning: New policies, new practices (pp.202- 218). New York: Teachers College Press. Davidson, C., & Tolich, M. (Eds.). (1999). Social science research in New Zealand: Many paths to understanding. Auckland, New Zealand: Longman. Davis, M. (2003). Barriers to reflective practice: The changing nature of higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 4(3), 243-255. Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers: The challenges of lifelong learning. London; Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press. Denzin, N., & Lincoln, Y. (1994). Introduction: Entering the field of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 1-17). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Delamont, S. (2002). Fieldwork in educational settings: Methods, pitfalls and perspectives (2nd ed.). London: Routledge Deutsch, G. L. (1996). Influencing factors along the road of reflective practice. PhD thesis, University of Hartford. Dewey, J. (1910). How we think. Boston: D.C. Heath. Dewey, J. (1933). How we think: A restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. New York: D.C. Heath and Company. Dornyei, Z. (2007). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Duff, P. A. (2008). Case study in applied Linguistics. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum/Taylor & Francis. Duff, P. A. (2013). Case study. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics (pp. 573-581). Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell. Duret, E., Abdulmalik, H., & Jones, S. (2010). Mid-Term Evaluation of the EFA Fast Track Initiative Country Case Study: Yemen. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Education. Dwyer, S. C., & Buckle, J. L. (2009). The space between: On being an insideroutsider in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 8, 54-63. Eisenhart, M., Shrum, J., Harding, J., & Cuthbert, A. (1988). Teacher beliefs: Definitions, findings and directions. Educational Policy, 2(1), 51-70. Eraut, M. (1985). Knowledge creation and knowledge use in professional contexts. Studies in Higher Education, 10, 117-133. Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In C. W. Merlin, (Ed.). Handbook on research on teaching. New York: Macmillian. Eryaman, M. (2007). From reflective practice to practical wisdom: Towards a post-foundational teacher education. International Journal of Progressive Education, 3(1), 1-36. Fang, Z. (1996). A review of research on teacher beliefs and practices. Educational Research, 38, 47-65. Farnan, N. & Grisham, D. (2005). Teacher preparation programs graduate highly qualified. In S. Lenski, D. Grisham, & L. Wold (Eds.), Literacy teacher preparation: Ten truths teacher educators need to know. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. Farrell, T. (1999). Reflective practice in an EFL teacher development group. System, 27, 157-172. Farrell, T. (2007). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. London: UK: Continuum Press. Farrell, T. (2008). Reflective practice in the professional development of teachers of adult English language learners. Washington, DC: Center for Applied Linguistics. Fendler, L. (2003). Teacher reflection in a hall of mirrors: Historical influences and political reverberations. Educational Researcher, 32(3), 16-25. Fensom, G. (2007). Coming to know reflective practice: An ethnography of novice university teachers. Ph.D. dissertation, University of New Hampshire, United States. Flick, U. (1998). An introduction to qualitative research. London: Sage. Fook, J., & Gardner, F. (2007). Practicing critical reflection: A resource handbook. London: Open University Press. Fosnot, C. (1996). Teachers construct constructivism: The centre for constructivist teaching/ teacher preparation project. In C. Fosnot (Ed.), Constructivism: Theory, perspectives and practice (pp. 205-216). New York: Teachers College Press. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books. Genor, M. (2005). A social reconstructionist framework for reflection: The “problematizing” of teaching. Issues in Teacher Education, 14(2), 45-62. Ghaye, T. (2005). Reflection as a catalyst for change. Reflective Practice, 6(2), 177-187. Gimenez, T. (1999). Reflective teaching and teacher education contributions from teacher training. Linguagem & Ensino, 2(2), 129-143. Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming a qualitative researcher: An introduction. New York: Longman. Goleman, D. (1999). Working with emotional intelligence. London: Bloomsbury. Goolsby, T. (1999). A comparison of expert and novice music teachers' preparing identical band compositions: An operational replication. Journal of Research in Music Education, 47(2), 174-187. Griffiths, M., & Tann, S. (1992). Using reflective practice to link personal and public theories. Journal of Education for Teaching, 18(1), 69-84. Harmer, J. (2002). The practice of English language teaching. London: Personal Education Ltd. Harrington, H. (1992). Fostering critical reflection through technology: Preparing prospective teachers for a changing society. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 1(1), 67-82. Hartnell-Young, E. (2003) Towards knowledge-building: Reflecting on teachers’ roles and professional learning in communities of practice. PhD thesis, Department of Education Policy and Management, the University of Melbourne. Hoban, G. (1997). Opportunities for knowledge building in professional development models. In Faculty of Education, Charles Sturt University (Ed.), Exploring professional development in education (pp. 1-20). Wentworth Falls, NSW: Social Science Press. Hord, S. (1997). Professional learning communities: Communities of continuous inquiry and improvement. Retrieved November 6, 2008, from Southwest Educational Development Laboratory web site: http://www.sedl.org/pubs/change34/4. html. Hos, R., & Kekec, M. (2014). The mismatch between non-native English as a foreign language (EFL) teachers‟ grammar beliefs and classroom practices. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 5(1), 80-87. doi: 10.4304/jltr.5.1.80-87. Houston, W., & Clift, R. (1990). The potential for research contribution to reflective practice. In R. Clift, W. Houston & M. Pugach, (Eds.), Encouraging reflective practice in education, (pp. 208–222). New York: Teachers College Press. Howard, T. C. (2003). Culturally relevant pedagogy: Ingredients for critical teacher reflection. Theory into Practice, 42(3), 195-202. Hsiu-ting, H. (2008). Teacher learning: Reflective practice as a site of engagement for professional identity construction. US-China Education Review, 5(5). Hubball, H., Collins, J., & Pratt, D. (2005). Enhancing reflective teaching practices: Implications for faculty developmental programs. Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 35(3), 57-81. Huettman, E. (1993). Using triangulation effectively in qualitative research. The Bulletin, 42. Jay, J. K., & Johnson, K. L. (2002). Capturing complexity: A typology of reflective practice for teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 18, 73-85. Jones, B., Valdez, G., Nowakowski, J., & Rasmussen, C. (1995). New times demand new ways of learning. Washington, DC: North Central Regional Laboratory. Julien, H. (2008). Codes and coding. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vols. 1 & 2) (pp. 85–88). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Kagan, D. (1990). Ways of evaluating teacher cognition: Inferences concerning the goldilocks principle. Review of Educational Research, 60, 419-469. Kane, R., Sandretto, S., & Heath, C. (2002). Telling half the story: A critical review of research on the teaching beliefs and practices of university teachers. American Educational Research Association, 72(2), 177-228. Kane, R., Sandretto, S., & Heath, C. (2004). An investigation into excellent tertiary teaching: Emphasizing reflective practice. Higher Education, 47(3), 283-310. Karban, K., & Smith, S. (2006). Developing critical reflection within an interprofessional learning programme. Institute of Medical Education, Leeds UK. Kelly, G. (1955). The psychology of personal constructs (Vol. 1 & 2). New York: Norton. Kember, D., Leung, D., Jones, A., Loke, A., McKay, J., Sinclair, K., Tse, H., Webb, C., Wong, F., Wong, M., & Yeung, E. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(A), 381-395. Kerstetter, K. (2012). Insider, outsider, or somewhere in between: The impact of researchers' identities on the community-based research process. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 27(2), 99–117. Kilbourn, B. (2006). The qualitative doctoral dissertation proposal. Teachers College Record, 108, 529-576. Killen, R. (2007). Effective teaching strategies: Lessons from research and practice (4th ed.). South Melbourne, Vic.: Thomson Social Science Press. Killion, J. (2000). Effective staff learning must be linked to student learning. Oxford, OH: National Staff Development Council. Killion, J., & Todnem, G. (1991). A process for personal theory building. Educational Leadership, 48 (1), 14-16. Kirby, P., & Teddlie, C. (1989). Development of the reflective teaching instrument. Journal of Education Research, 22(4), 46-51. Kohlbacher, F. (2006). The use of qualitative content analysis in case study research. Forum. Qualitative Social Research, 7(1). Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Krueger, R. A., & Casey, M. A. (2001). Designing and conducting focus group interviews. In R. A. Krueger, M. A. Casey, J. Donner, S. Kirsch, & J. A. Maack, (Eds.), Social analysis: Selected tools and techniques, (pp. 4-23). Washington, D.C.: The Social Development Family. Kumaravadivelu, B. (1999) Critical classroom discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 453-484. Kuzborska, I. (2011). Links between teachers‟ beliefs and practices and research on reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 23(1), 102-128. Kvale, S. (1996). Interviews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE. Lengeling, M. (2013). Borrowing the use of ethnographic notes from the social sciences for classroom observations in central Mexico. In J. Edge & S. Mann (Eds.), Innovations in pre-service education and training for English language teachers (pp. 63-80). London: The British Council. Levine, A. (2005). Educating school leaders. New York: Columbia University. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic enquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2009). The only generalization is: There is no generalization. In R. Gomm & M. Hammersley & P. Foster (Eds.), Case Study Method (pp. 27-45). Thousand Oaks: Sage. Lortie, D. (1975). School teacher. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Loughran, J. (1996). Developing reflective practice: Learning about teaching and learning through modeling. London: The Falmer Press. Lyons, N. (2006). Reflective engagement as professional development in the lives of university teachers. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 12 (2), 151–168. McAlpine, L., & Weston, C. (2000). Reflection: Issues related to improving professors‟ teaching and students‟ learning. Instructional Science, 28, 363-385. McLean, J. (2007). Reflecting on your teaching. In E. Friesen & C. Kristjanson (Eds.), Teaching at the University of Manitoba: A handbook. University Teaching Services: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Means, B., & Olsen, K. (1994). The link between technology and authentic learning. Educational Leadership, 51(5), 15-19. Mena Marcos, J., Sanchez, E., & Tillema, H. (2009). Teacher reflection on action: What is said (in research) and what is done (in teaching). Reflective Practice, 10(2), 191-204. Mena Marcos, J., Sanchez, E., & Tillema, H.H. (2011). Promoting teacher reflection: What is said to be done. Journal of Education for Teaching, 37(1), 21-36. Merriam, S. B. (1988). Case study research in education: A qualitative approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implimentation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative dimensions of adult learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. Thousand Oak, California: Sage Publication. Minah Harun (2007) Malay-Chinese interethnic communication in Malaysia: An analysis of sensemaking in everyday experiences. PhD thesis, Ohio University. Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research. (2005). National Strategy for the Development of Higher Education in Yemen. Higher Education, Sana‟a, Yemen. Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research. (2007). Higher Education, Sana‟a, Yemen. Montie, J., York-Barr, J., Kronberg, R., Stevenson, J.,Vallejo, B., & Lunders, C. (1998). Reflective practice: Creating capacities for school improvement. Washington. DC: Corwin Press. Moon, J. (1999) Reflection in learning and professional development. London: Kogan Page. Munoz, D. (2007). Exploring five Mexican English language teachers‟ perceptions of their professional development and its relation to autonomy. ELTED, 10, 2007. Murray, H., Gillese, E., Lennon, M., Mercer, P., & Robinson, M. (2007). Reflecting on the practice of teaching: Ethical principles in university teaching. In E. Friesen, & C. Kristiansen (Eds.), Teaching at the University of Manitoba: A handbook. University Teaching Services: Winnipeg, Manitoba. Neufeld, J., & Grimmett, P. (1994). The authenticity for struggle. In P. Grimmett & J. Neufeld, (Eds.), Teacher development and the struggle for authenticity: Professional growth and restructuring in the context of change. New York: Teachers College Press. Nunan, D., & Lamb, C. (1996). The self- directed teacher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Osterman, K. (1991). Reflective practice: Linking professional development and school reform. Planning and Changing, 22(3&4), 208-217. Osterman, K., & Kottkamp, R. (1993). Reflective practice for educators. Newbury Park, CA: Corwin Press. Osterman, K., & Kottkamp, R. (2004). Reflective practice for educators: Professional development to improve student learning. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Corwin Press. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Patton, M. Q. (1999). Enhancing the qualitative and credibility of qualitative analysis. Health Services Research, 34(5), 1189-1208. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Two decades of development in qualitative inquiry: A personal, experiential perspective. Qualitative Social Work, 1(3), 261-283. Patton, M. Q. (2008). Evaluation criteria. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vols. 1 & 2) (pp. 301–303). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Piaget, J. (1973). To understand is to invent. New York: Grossman. Putnam, R., & Borko, H. (1997). Teacher learning: Implications of new views of cognition. In B. Biddle,T. Good, & I. Goodson (Eds.), International handbook of teachers and teaching (pp. 1223-1296). Amsterdam: Kluwer Academic. Rabiee, F. (2007). Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 63(4), 655-660. Rahimi, A., & Chabok, S. (2013). EFL Teachers‟ Levels of Reflective Teaching and their Conceptions of Teaching and Learning. Journal of Advanced Social Research, 3(1), 12-29. Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to teach in higher education. London: Routledge. Ramsey, S. (2003). Reflecting on the future education in the third millennium. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 5 (2), 132-130. Rando, W., & Menges, R. (1991). How practice is shaped by personal theories. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 45, 7-14. Reiman, A.J. (1999). The evolution of the social role taking and guided reflection framework in teacher education: Recent theory and quantitative synthesis of research. Teaching and Teacher Education, 15, 597-612. Richards, J. (1990). Beyond training: Approaches to teacher education in language teaching. The Language Teacher, 14, 3-8. Richards, J. C. (2002). 30 years of TEFL/TESL: A personal reflection. RELC Journal, 33(2), 1-35. Richards, J., & Farrell T. (2005) Professional development for language teachers: Strategies for teacher learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press. Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (2007). Reflective teaching in second language classroom. New York: Cambridge University Press. Richards, J., & Schmidt, R. (2002). Longman dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. London: Longman. Richardson, V. (1996). The role of attitudes and beliefs in learning to teach. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed.), (pp. 102-119). New York: Macmillan. Roberts, J. (1998). Language teacher education. London: Arnold. Rodgers, C. (2002). Defining reflection: Another look at John Dewey and reflective thinking. Teachers College Record, 104(4), 842–866. Rogers, G., & Bouey, E. (1996). Collecting your data. In L. Tutty, M. Rothery, R. Grinnell (Eds.), Qualitative research for social workers: Phases, steps, and tasks (4th ed.), (pp. 50-87). Boston: Ally & Bacon. Roulston, K. J. (2008). Conversational Interviewing. In L. M. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (Vols. 1 & 2) (pp. 127–129). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE. Rotherham, A., Mikuta, J., & Freeland J. (2008). Letter to the next president. Journal of Teacher Education, 59(3), 242-251. Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (1995). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. United States: Basic Books, Inc. Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Schraw, G. (1998). Promoting general metacognitive awareness. Instructional Science, 26, 113-125. Schuster, J. (2003). The faculty makeover: What does it mean for students? New Directions for Higher Education, 123. Selinger, S. (1991, January 1). Share and take: A path to critical reflection for entrylevel teachers. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED344863) Retrieved August 8, 2009, from ERIC database. Silverman, D. (2013). Doing qualitative research. London: Sage. Smith, L. (2002). Reconceptualizing context from a situated perspective: Teacher beliefs and the activity of teaching within the context of science reform. PhD dissertation, University of Utah, Salt Lake City. Smith, T. (2008). Reflective Teaching. EBSCO Research Starters. Smith, K. (2009). Confessions of a reflective practitioner. New Teacher Advocate, 13. Smyth, W. (1992). Teachers‟ work and the politics of reflection. American Education Research Journal, 29, 267-300. Smyth, A., & Holian, R. (2008). Credibility Issues in Research from within Organisations. In P. Sikes & A. Potts (Eds.), Researching education from the inside (pp. 33–47). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis. Sparks-Langer, G., & Colton, A. (1991). Synthesis of research on teachers‟ reflective thinking. Educational Leadership, 48(6), 37–44. Stake, R. (1988). Case study methods in educational research: Seeking sweet water. In M. J. Richard (Ed.), Complementary methods for research in education. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association. Stage, F., & Russel, R. (1993). Using method triangulation in college student research. Journal of College Student Development, 33, 485-490. Stern, H. H. (1983). Fundamental concepts of language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Tarrant, P. (2013). Reflective practice and professional development. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE. Tatto, M. T., & Coupland, D. B. (2003). Teacher education and teachers‟ beliefs: Theoretical and measurement concerns. In J. Rath & A. C. McAninch (Eds.), Advances in Teacher Education series, 6 (pp. 123-181). Greenwich, CT: Information Age. Thomas, L., MacMillan, J., McColl, E., Hale, C., & Bond, S. (1995). Comparison of focus group and individual interview methodology in examining patient satisfaction with nursing care. Social Sciences in Health 1, 206–219. Tonkin, H., & Reagan, T. (Eds.) (2003). Language in The twenty-First Century: selected papers of the Millenial Conferences of the Center for Research and Documentation on World Language Problems, held at the University of Hartford and Yale University. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing. Underhill, A. (1997). The teacher development series. In K. Head and P. Taylor (Eds.), Readings in teacher development. Oxford : Heinemman. Unluer, S. (2012). Being an insider researcher while conducting case study research. The Qualitative Report, 17(58), 1-14. Urzua, A., & Vasquez, C. (2008). Reflection and professional identity in teachers‟ future-oriented discourse. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1935–1946. Valli, L. (1993). Reflective teacher education programs: An analysis of case studies. In J. Calderhead (Ed.). Conceptualizing reflection in teacher development (pp.11-22). Albany, NJ: SUNY Press. Van Manen, M. (1977). Linking ways of knowing with ways of being practical. Curriculum Inquiry, 6, 205-228. Wallace, M. (1991). Educating foreign language teachers: A reflective approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Wildman, T., Niles, J., Magliaro, S., & McLaughlin, R. (1990). Promoting reflective practice among beginning and experienced teachers. In R. Clift, W. Houston, & M. Pugach (Eds.), Encouraging reflective practice in education (pp. 139-162). New York: Teachers College Press. Wlodarsky, R. (2005). The professoriate: Transforming teaching practices through critical reflection and dialogue. Teaching and Learning: The Journal of Natural Inquiry and Reflective Practice, 19(3). Wlodarsky, R., & Walters, H. (2006). The reflective practitioner in higher education: The nature and characteristics of reflective practice among teacher education faculty. National Forum of Teacher Education Journal, 16(3), 1-16. Woods, D. (1995). Teacher cognition in language teaching: Beliefs, decision-making and classroom practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Yaxley, B. (1991). Developing teachers’ theories of teaching: A touchstone approach. London: The Falmer Press. Yin, R. (1984). Case study research: Design and methods. Newbury Park, Calif: Sage. Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA:Sage. York-Barr, J., Sommers, W., Ghere, G., & Montie, J. (2006). Reflective practice to improve schools: An action guide for educators. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press. Zeichner, K. (1994). Research on teacher thinking and different views of reflective practice in teaching and teacher education. In I. Carlgren, G. Handal & S. Vaage, (Eds.), Teachers’ minds and actions: Research on teachers’ thinking and practice. Bristol, PA: Falmer Press. Zeichner, K., & Liston, D. (1996). Reflective teaching: An introduction. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Zheng, H. (2009). A review of research on EFL pre-service teachers' beliefs and practices. Journal of Cambridge Studies, 4(1), 73-81. |