Perbezaan komitmen keselamatan mengikut faktor-faktor demografi dalam kalangan staf Kolej Kemahiran Tinggi Mara (KKTM) Rembau

This study aims to identify the level Safety Commitment among the academic staffs of Kolej Kemharin Tinggi MARA Rembau (KKTMR). In conducting this study, the questionnaire was used as the main instrument to collect data. Data were analyzed descriptively using frequency, percentage and mean score to...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Muhammad Asy Syahid, Mohamad Salim
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2014
Subjects:	T55-55.3 Industrial Safety Industrial Accident Prevention
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/4710/1/s809086.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4710/2/s809086_abstract.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.4710
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Mustafa, Munauwar
topic	T55-55.3 Industrial Safety Industrial Accident Prevention
spellingShingle	T55-55.3 Industrial Safety Industrial Accident Prevention Muhammad Asy Syahid, Mohamad Salim Perbezaan komitmen keselamatan mengikut faktor-faktor demografi dalam kalangan staf Kolej Kemahiran Tinggi Mara (KKTM) Rembau
description	This study aims to identify the level Safety Commitment among the academic staffs of Kolej Kemharin Tinggi MARA Rembau (KKTMR). In conducting this study, the questionnaire was used as the main instrument to collect data. Data were analyzed descriptively using frequency, percentage and mean score to determine the level of commitment towards safety and health at workplace. In order to see the mean different between demographic factors and the level of commitment towards safety and health, one way ANOVA test was used. The results showed that staffs KKTMR have a high level of commitment to safety and health by finding the average total mean score for each factor 3.59. The study also conducted an evaluation of the academic staff commitment on safety and health based on demographic characteristics. The findings have shown that demographic factors such as gender, age and education level were found to not affect the levels of safety commitment at KKTMR. However, the demography factor of the department or teaching area has shown a significant result with significant value of less than 0.05 (which is 0.03). Multiple Comparison test shows that there is a significant difference between an Internal Design Department and Furniture Design Department with significant value of 0.039. There is significant value between Furniture Design Department compared to Film and Animation Design with significant value of 0.027. Finally, this study found that in order to enhance the level of safety commitment among staff at KKTMR, the department or organization concern should intensify programs such as health and safety training, safety awareness talk, safety rules enforcement and other awareness activities as well
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Muhammad Asy Syahid, Mohamad Salim
author_facet	Muhammad Asy Syahid, Mohamad Salim
author_sort	Muhammad Asy Syahid, Mohamad Salim
title	Perbezaan komitmen keselamatan mengikut faktor-faktor demografi dalam kalangan staf Kolej Kemahiran Tinggi Mara (KKTM) Rembau
title_short	Perbezaan komitmen keselamatan mengikut faktor-faktor demografi dalam kalangan staf Kolej Kemahiran Tinggi Mara (KKTM) Rembau
title_full	Perbezaan komitmen keselamatan mengikut faktor-faktor demografi dalam kalangan staf Kolej Kemahiran Tinggi Mara (KKTM) Rembau
title_fullStr	Perbezaan komitmen keselamatan mengikut faktor-faktor demografi dalam kalangan staf Kolej Kemahiran Tinggi Mara (KKTM) Rembau
title_full_unstemmed	Perbezaan komitmen keselamatan mengikut faktor-faktor demografi dalam kalangan staf Kolej Kemahiran Tinggi Mara (KKTM) Rembau
title_sort	perbezaan komitmen keselamatan mengikut faktor-faktor demografi dalam kalangan staf kolej kemahiran tinggi mara (kktm) rembau
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate	2014
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/4710/1/s809086.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4710/2/s809086_abstract.pdf
_version_	1747827785491021824
spelling	my-uum-etd.47102022-08-03T01:57:13Z Perbezaan komitmen keselamatan mengikut faktor-faktor demografi dalam kalangan staf Kolej Kemahiran Tinggi Mara (KKTM) Rembau 2014 Muhammad Asy Syahid, Mohamad Salim Mustafa, Munauwar Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business T55-55.3 Industrial Safety. Industrial Accident Prevention This study aims to identify the level Safety Commitment among the academic staffs of Kolej Kemharin Tinggi MARA Rembau (KKTMR). In conducting this study, the questionnaire was used as the main instrument to collect data. Data were analyzed descriptively using frequency, percentage and mean score to determine the level of commitment towards safety and health at workplace. In order to see the mean different between demographic factors and the level of commitment towards safety and health, one way ANOVA test was used. The results showed that staffs KKTMR have a high level of commitment to safety and health by finding the average total mean score for each factor 3.59. The study also conducted an evaluation of the academic staff commitment on safety and health based on demographic characteristics. The findings have shown that demographic factors such as gender, age and education level were found to not affect the levels of safety commitment at KKTMR. However, the demography factor of the department or teaching area has shown a significant result with significant value of less than 0.05 (which is 0.03). Multiple Comparison test shows that there is a significant difference between an Internal Design Department and Furniture Design Department with significant value of 0.039. There is significant value between Furniture Design Department compared to Film and Animation Design with significant value of 0.027. Finally, this study found that in order to enhance the level of safety commitment among staff at KKTMR, the department or organization concern should intensify programs such as health and safety training, safety awareness talk, safety rules enforcement and other awareness activities as well 2014 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4710/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4710/1/s809086.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4710/2/s809086_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Ab. Aziz, Y., & Intan, O. (2002). Pengurusan sumber manusia: Konsep, isu dan pelaksanaan (Ed. Pertama). Petaling Jaya: Prentice Hall. Akta Keselamatan dan Kesihatan Pekerjaan (1994). International Law Book Series.ILBS. Allen, N. J., & Meyer, J. P. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1-18. Angle, H. L., & Perry, J. L. (1981). An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26(1). Aven Jr, F. F., Parker, B., & McEvoy, G. M. (1993). Gender and attitudinal commitment to organizations: A meta-analysis. Journal of Business Research, 26(1), 63-73. Azir, S. (2010). Safety behaviour in the Malaysian petrochemical industry. PHD Tesis, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Barling, J., & Hutchinson, I. (2000). Commitment vs. control‐based safety practices, safety reputation, and perceived safety climate. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 17(1), 76-84. Becker, H. S. (1960). Notes on the concept of commitment. American Journal of Sociology, 32-40. Becker, T. E., Randall, D. M., & Riegel, C. D. (1995). The multidimensional view of commitment and the theory of reasoned action: A comparative evaluation. Journal of Management, 21(4), 617-638. Buchanan, I.I. (1974). Building organizational commitment: The socialization of managers in work organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 19(4). Cascio, J. & Baughn, K. T. (2000). Health, safety and ISO 14001. Manufacturing Engineering, 124(5), 126-135. Cheyne, A., Cox, S., Oliver, A., & Tomas, J. M. (1998). Modeling safety climate in the prediction of levels of safety activity. Work & Stress, 12(3), 255-271. Clarke, S. (1998). Organizational factors affecting the incident reporting of train drivers. Work & Stress, 12(1), 6-16. Clarke, S. (1999). Perceptions of organizational safety: implications for the development of safety culture. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 20(2), 185-198. Cook, J. & Wall, T. (1980). New work attitude measure of trust, organizational commitment and personnel need non-fulfilment. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 53, 39-52. Cooper, D. (1998). Improving safety culture: A practical guide. England: Wiley. Cooper, M. D., & Phillips, R. A. (2004). Exploratory analysis of the safety climate and safety behaviour relationship. Journal of Safety Research, 35(5), 497-512. Cox, S. & Flin, R, (1998). Safety culture: philosopher’s or man of straw. Work & Stress,12(3), 189-201. Davies, V.J., Tomasin, K. (1996). Construction Safety Handbook. London: Thomas Telford Ltd. Dedobbeleer, N., & Beland, F. (1991). A safety climate measure for construction sites. Journal of Safety Research, 22(2), 97-103. Fadzli Shah, A. A. (2008). Safety culture and commitment to safety in the Malaysian railway system. PHD Tesis, University of Nottingham. Garis panduan pencegahan kemalangan di tempat kerja (2008). Unit Kesihatan Pekerjaan, Bahagian Kawalan Penyakit, Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia. Geller, E. S. (2000). The Psychology of Safety Handbook. CRC Press. Glendon, A. I., & Litherland, D. K. (2001). Safety climate factors, group differences and safety behaviour in road construction. Safety Science, 39(3), 157-188. Goetsch, D.L. (1999). Occupational safety and health for technologists, engineers and manager (3rd Ed). New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Harper, R. S., & Koehn, E. (1998). Managing industrial construction safety in southeast Texas. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 124(6), 452-457. Hofmann, D. A., & Morgeson, F. P. (1999). Safety-related behaviour as a social exchange: The role of perceived organizational support and leader–member exchange. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(2), 286. Hopfl, H. (1994). Safety culture, corporate culture: Organizational transformation and the commitment to safety. Disaster Prevention and Management, 3(3), 49-58. Hrebiniak, L. G., & Alutto, J. A. (1972). Personal and role-related factors in the development of organizational commitment. Administrative Science Quarterly, 555-573. Isla Diaz, R., & Diaz Cabrera, D. (1997). Safety climate and attitude as evaluation measures of organizational safety. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 29(5), 643-650. Ivancevich, J.M. (2001). Human Resources Management. Boston: Irwin. Jonnson, S. E. (2003). Behavioural safety theory: Understanding the theoretical foundation. Professional Safety, 48, 10. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford press. Komaki, J., Heinzmann, A. T., & Lawson, L. (1980). Effect of training and feedback: component analysis of a behavioural safety program. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(3), 261. Lok, P., & Crawford, J. (1999). The relationship between commitment and organizational culture, subculture, leadership style and job satisfaction in organizational change and development. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 20(7), 365-374. Metcalfe, B., & Dick, G. (2002). Is the force still with her? Gender and commitment in the police. Women in Management Review, 17(8), 392-403. Michael, J. H., Guo, Z. G., Wiedenbeck, J. K., & Ray, C. D. (2006). Production supervisor impacts on subordinates' safety outcomes: An investigation of leadermember exchange and safety communication. Journal of Safety Research, 37(5), 469-477. Miozza, M. L., & Wyld, D. C. (2002). The carrot or the soft stick?: The perspective of American safety professionals on behaviour and incentive-based protection programmes. Management Research News, 25(11), 23-41. Morrow, P. C. (1983). Concept redundancy in organizational research: The case of work commitment. Academy of Management Review, 8(3), 486-500. Nicholas, C. & Wangel, A. (1995). Safety at work in Malaysia an anthology of current research. Kuala Lumpur: Institute of Advanced Studies. Norwood, S. L. (2000). Research strategies for advanced practice nurses. Upper Saddle New Jersey: Prentice Hall Health. Onn, F. C. (2000). Teks ucapan pelancaran kempen bulan keselamatan dan kesihatan pekerjaan. Kuala Lumpur: Kementerian Sumber Manusia. O’'Toole, M. (2002).The relationship between employees' perceptions of safety and organizational culture. Journal of Safety Research, 33(2), 231-243. O’Toole, M. F. (1999). Successful safety committees: Participation not legislation. Journal of Safety Research, 30(1), 39-65. Persatuan Kerja Sosial. (2012). Laporan Tahunan Persatuan Kerja Sosial (PERKESO) 2012. Akses 20 November 2013, daripada http://www.perkeso.gov.my. Ramlan, Z. A. (1997). Latihan dalam bidang keselamatan dan kesan terhadap kesedaran keselamatan di tempat kerja: Satu kajian di Kilang X (M) Sdn. Bhd. Tesis Sarjana, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Reason, J. (1990). Human error. Cambridge University Press. Reichers, A. E. (1985). A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Academy of Management Review, 10(3), 465-476. Salancik, G. R. (1977). Commitment and the control of organizational behaviour and belief. New Directions in Organizational Behaviour, 1-54. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business a skill building approach (4th ed.) USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Ting, K. S. (2007) Kajian mengenai penggunaan E-pembelajaran (E-learning) di kalangan pelajar Jabatan Pendidikan Teknik dan Vokasional di Institut Pengajian Tinggi Negeri Johor. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Tuck, B., Rolfe, J., & Adair, V. (1994). Adolescents' attitude toward gender roles within work and its relationship to gender, personality type, and parental occupation. Sex Roles, 31(9-10), 547-558. Wiener, Y., & Gechman, A. S. (1977). Commitment: A behavioural approach to job involvement. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 10(1), 47-52. Zohar, D. (1980). Safety climate in industrial organizations: Theoretical and applied implications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(1), 96. Zohar, D. (1997). Predicting burnout with a hassle‐based measure of role demands. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 18(2), 101-115.

Perbezaan komitmen keselamatan mengikut faktor-faktor demografi dalam kalangan staf Kolej Kemahiran Tinggi Mara (KKTM) Rembau

Similar Items