Pengurusan kesejahteraan dan hubungannya dengan prestasi pencapaian Fizik dalam kalangan pelajar kolej matrikulasi

Pengurusan kesejahteraan dan hubungannya dengan prestasi pencapaian Fizik dalam kalangan pelajar kolej matrikulasi

The study examines the students' well-being for matriculation's student in Program Dua Tahun (PDT) Kohort 2010/2011 di Kolej Matrikulasi Kedah with a total of 180 respondents comprised of 66 male and 114 female students. Beside, demographic factor which is gender and academic. achievement...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Roosaniza, Ramli
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2011
Subjects:
LB1050.9-1091 Educational psychology
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4742/1/s800394.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4742/7/s800394_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4742
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Don, Yahya
topic LB1050.9-1091 Educational psychology
spellingShingle LB1050.9-1091 Educational psychology
Roosaniza, Ramli
Pengurusan kesejahteraan dan hubungannya dengan prestasi pencapaian Fizik dalam kalangan pelajar kolej matrikulasi
description The study examines the students' well-being for matriculation's student in Program Dua Tahun (PDT) Kohort 2010/2011 di Kolej Matrikulasi Kedah with a total of 180 respondents comprised of 66 male and 114 female students. Beside, demographic factor which is gender and academic. achievement also has been tested its relationship to the student's wellbeing. This decriptive7s study employed a set of questionnaire using six point Likert scales measuring on students' five different factor for well being which is family, peers, school and self. The Cronbach Alpha coefficient for the instrument is 0.84 and 0.501 each survey.. The result showed that the gender has significance relationship to the well-being for family's factor and not for the other three factors. For academic achievement there is a significance relationship in all factors. Finally, several recommendations were given to enhance students7 teaching and learning effectiveness
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Roosaniza, Ramli
author_facet Roosaniza, Ramli
author_sort Roosaniza, Ramli
title Pengurusan kesejahteraan dan hubungannya dengan prestasi pencapaian Fizik dalam kalangan pelajar kolej matrikulasi
title_short Pengurusan kesejahteraan dan hubungannya dengan prestasi pencapaian Fizik dalam kalangan pelajar kolej matrikulasi
title_full Pengurusan kesejahteraan dan hubungannya dengan prestasi pencapaian Fizik dalam kalangan pelajar kolej matrikulasi
title_fullStr Pengurusan kesejahteraan dan hubungannya dengan prestasi pencapaian Fizik dalam kalangan pelajar kolej matrikulasi
title_full_unstemmed Pengurusan kesejahteraan dan hubungannya dengan prestasi pencapaian Fizik dalam kalangan pelajar kolej matrikulasi
title_sort pengurusan kesejahteraan dan hubungannya dengan prestasi pencapaian fizik dalam kalangan pelajar kolej matrikulasi
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
publishDate 2011
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4742/1/s800394.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4742/7/s800394_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827791588491264
spelling my-uum-etd.47422016-04-27T07:55:21Z Pengurusan kesejahteraan dan hubungannya dengan prestasi pencapaian Fizik dalam kalangan pelajar kolej matrikulasi 2011 Roosaniza, Ramli Don, Yahya Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB1050.9-1091 Educational psychology The study examines the students' well-being for matriculation's student in Program Dua Tahun (PDT) Kohort 2010/2011 di Kolej Matrikulasi Kedah with a total of 180 respondents comprised of 66 male and 114 female students. Beside, demographic factor which is gender and academic. achievement also has been tested its relationship to the student's wellbeing. This decriptive7s study employed a set of questionnaire using six point Likert scales measuring on students' five different factor for well being which is family, peers, school and self. The Cronbach Alpha coefficient for the instrument is 0.84 and 0.501 each survey.. The result showed that the gender has significance relationship to the well-being for family's factor and not for the other three factors. For academic achievement there is a significance relationship in all factors. Finally, several recommendations were given to enhance students7 teaching and learning effectiveness 2011 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4742/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4742/1/s800394.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4742/7/s800394_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Andi Mappiare (1982). Psikologi remaja Surabaya. Usaha Nasional. Baker, J.A. (1998). The social context of school satisfaction among urban, lowincome African American students. School Psychology Quarterly, 13(1). 25-44. Berndt, T.L. & Keefe, K. (1995). Fried's influence on adolescent adjustment to school. Child Development 66, 1312-1320. Bonny, A.E. (2000). School disconnectedness: Identifying adolescents at risk Pediatrics Journal. Catholic Education Office, Archdiocese of Melbourne 2006, Student wellbeing: central to learning and school improvement, Catholic Education Office, Melbourne. Coover, G.E, & Murphy, S.T. (2000). The communicated self. Human Communication Research, 26(1), 125-148. Edwards, L.M., & Lopez, S J. (2006). Perceived family support, acculturation, and life satisfaction in Mexican Youth : A mixed-methods exploration. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 53(1). Elder, G.H., & Conger, R.D. (2000). Children of the success in rural America. Chicago: The University of Chicago. Finn, J.D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59, 117-142. Fraillon, J 2005, Measuring student well-being in the context of Australian schooling, Discussion Paper, Curriculum Corporation (MCEETYA), Carlton South, Victoria. Fujita, F., Diener, E, & Sandvik, E. (1991). Gender differences in negative affect and well-being: The case for emotional intensity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(3), 427-434. Fullarton, S. (2002). Student engagement with school: Individual and school-level influenes. Research report number 27, Longitudinal Surveys of Australian Youth. Victoria, Australia: Australia Council for Educational Research. Goodenow, C. (1993). The psychological sense of school membership among adolescents: Scale development and educational correlates. Psychology in the Schools. 30, 79-90. Hassan Langsung (1983). Psikologi dan kesihatan mental di sekolah-sekolah. Bangi: UKM. Hay, D.F., Payne, A,, & Chadwick, A. (2004). Peer relations in childhood. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 45(1), 84-108. Hay. I., Ashman, A.F., & Kraayenoord, C.E. (1998). The influence of gender, academic achievement and non-school factors upon pre-adolescent self-concept. Educational Psychology, 18(4), 461-470. Hill, B 2004, 'Core values in the balance', in Proceedings of the ACER Conference 'Supporting Student Wellbeing', 24-26 October, Australian Council for Educational Research, Camberwell, Victoria, pp. 17-20. Hoglund, W.L., & Leadbeater, B J. (2004). The effects of family, school and classroom ecologies on changes in children's social competence and emotional and behavioral problems in First Grade. Developmental Psychology, 40(4), 533-544. Huebner, ES. (1991). Correlates of life satisfaction in children. School Psychology Quarterly, 6, 103- 111. Huebner, E.S., Gilman, R, & Laughlin, J.E. (1999). A multimethod investigation of multidimensionality of childreds well-being reports: Discriminant validity of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Social lndicators Research. 46, 1-22. Huebner, E.S., Funk, B.A., & Gilman, R (2000). Cross-sectional and longitudinal psychosocial correlates of adolesent life satisfaction reports. Canadian Journal of School Psychology, 16, 53-64. Huebner, BS, Suldo, S.M., Smith, LC., & McKnight, G. (2004). Life satisfaction in children and youth: Empirical foundations and implications for school psychologists. Psychology in Schools, 41(1), 81-93. Institut Penyelidikan Pendidikan Tinggi Negara (IPPTN). 2005. Kajian prestasi akademik pelajar lepasan matrikulasi di Institut Pengajian Awam (IPTA). Laporan IPPTN. Isen, A.M. (1999). Positive Affect. Dlm. T. Daigleish & M. Power, Handbook of cognition and emotion. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. Isen, A.M. (2000). Positive affect and decision making. Dlm. M. Lewis & J.M. Haviland-Jones, Handbook of emotions (2nd. Ed) New York: The Guilford press. Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M.L. (1999). Achievement goals and student well-being. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24, 330-358. Larson, R, & Richards, M.H. (1991). Daily companionship in late childhood and early adolescence: Changing developmental contexts. Child Development, 62, 284-300. Liu, X, Kaplan, H.B., & Riser, W. (1992). Decomposing the reciprocal relationships between academic achievement and general self-esteem. Youth & Society, 24(2), 123-148. Masters, G 2004, 'Conceptualising and researching student wellbeing', in Proceedings of the ACER Conference 'Supporting Student Wellbeing', 24-26 October, Australian Council for Educational Research, Camberwell, Victoria, pp. 1-7. Mau, Y.R. (1992). The validity and devolution of a concept: Student alienation. Adolescence. 27, 731-741. McDermott, P.A. (1995). Sex, race, class and other demographics as explanations for children's ability and adjustment: A national appraisal. Journal of School Psychology, 13(1), 75-91. McGlothlin, II., Killen, M., & Edmonds, C. (2005). Europan-American children's intergroup attitudes about peer relationships. British Journal Of Developmental Psychology. 23, 227-249, Pool, C.R (1997). Up with emotional health. Educational Leadership, 54(8), 12-14. Roisman, G.I. (2002). Beyond main effects models of adolescent work intensity, family closeness, and school disengagement: Mediational and conditional hypothesis Journal of Adolescent Research, 17(4), 331-345. Rosna Awang Hashim, Zahyah Hanafi, Harshita Aini Haroon, Azlina Murad Sani & Hamida Bee Abdul Karim (2006). Sosio-psycho1ogical determinants of adolescent school engagement Projek IRPA tidak diterbitkan. Sintok: UUM. Selivanova, Z.K. (2003). The life-purpose orientations of adolescents. Russian Education and Society, 45(7), 6-15. Stepien, E. (1998). Factors enhancing or impending adolescent's well-being. Paper presented at the 111 International Conference of Adolescentology, Milano. Utusan Malaysia (2001 Julai 16). Pencapaian pelajar bumiputera jauh ketinggalan. Utusan Malaysia (2001, Julai 17). Tidak yakin antara sebab pelajar kurang cemerlang. Veenhoven, R. (1988). The utility of happiness. Social Indicators Research, 20, 333-354. Wentzel, K.R. (1991). Relations between social competence and academic achievement in early adolescence. Child Development. 62, 1066-1078.

Similar Items