Gaya pembelajaran dan sikap pembelajaran Bahasa Inggeris dalam kalangan pelajar pedalaman di Daerah Telupid Sabah

Gaya pembelajaran dan sikap pembelajaran Bahasa Inggeris dalam kalangan pelajar pedalaman di Daerah Telupid Sabah

This study examines learning styles and attitudes of form four students' towards the learning of English language. A total of 169 secondary schools' students from Telupid district were involved in this study. The respondents comprised of 77 males and 92 females. This quantitative study wa...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Viknesvaran, Ramachandran
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2010
Subjects:
LB1603 Secondary Education
High schools
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4767/1/s802693.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4767/2/s802693_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4767
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Md. Ali, Ruzlan
topic LB1603 Secondary Education
High schools
spellingShingle LB1603 Secondary Education
High schools
Viknesvaran, Ramachandran
Gaya pembelajaran dan sikap pembelajaran Bahasa Inggeris dalam kalangan pelajar pedalaman di Daerah Telupid Sabah
description This study examines learning styles and attitudes of form four students' towards the learning of English language. A total of 169 secondary schools' students from Telupid district were involved in this study. The respondents comprised of 77 males and 92 females. This quantitative study was carried out by using a set of questionnaires that measures students learning style and attitudes toward English language learning. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 12. Apart from the Perceptual learning style which had visual, auditory, kinaesthetic and tactile (VAK), the five stimulation of learning styles by Dunn and Dunn (1978) which had Environmental, Emotional, Sociological, Physical and Psychological used in this studies to evaluate learning styles among students. The result indicated that students' learning styles are mainly related to Emotional category (mean 3.91, SD=0.48), VAK learning style (mean 3.68, SD=0.43), Sociological category (mean 3.63, SD=0.51), Psychological category (mean 3.33, SD=0.53), Physical category (mean 3.17, SD=0.53) and Environmental category (mean 3.15, SD=0.34). Findings from the study also indicated that there is no significant difference in learning styles based on gender. Results are also indicated that there is a relationship between achievement in English subject and perceptual learning style (VAK). The different learning styles and study attitudes level adopted by students have direct influence in students' orientations and approaches in learning. Based on the results, several recommendations are given to enhance teaching and students' learning effectiveness
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Viknesvaran, Ramachandran
author_facet Viknesvaran, Ramachandran
author_sort Viknesvaran, Ramachandran
title Gaya pembelajaran dan sikap pembelajaran Bahasa Inggeris dalam kalangan pelajar pedalaman di Daerah Telupid Sabah
title_short Gaya pembelajaran dan sikap pembelajaran Bahasa Inggeris dalam kalangan pelajar pedalaman di Daerah Telupid Sabah
title_full Gaya pembelajaran dan sikap pembelajaran Bahasa Inggeris dalam kalangan pelajar pedalaman di Daerah Telupid Sabah
title_fullStr Gaya pembelajaran dan sikap pembelajaran Bahasa Inggeris dalam kalangan pelajar pedalaman di Daerah Telupid Sabah
title_full_unstemmed Gaya pembelajaran dan sikap pembelajaran Bahasa Inggeris dalam kalangan pelajar pedalaman di Daerah Telupid Sabah
title_sort gaya pembelajaran dan sikap pembelajaran bahasa inggeris dalam kalangan pelajar pedalaman di daerah telupid sabah
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2010
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4767/1/s802693.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4767/2/s802693_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827797182644224
spelling my-uum-etd.47672015-07-23T06:50:28Z Gaya pembelajaran dan sikap pembelajaran Bahasa Inggeris dalam kalangan pelajar pedalaman di Daerah Telupid Sabah 2010 Viknesvaran, Ramachandran Md. Ali, Ruzlan College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB1603 Secondary Education. High schools This study examines learning styles and attitudes of form four students' towards the learning of English language. A total of 169 secondary schools' students from Telupid district were involved in this study. The respondents comprised of 77 males and 92 females. This quantitative study was carried out by using a set of questionnaires that measures students learning style and attitudes toward English language learning. The data was analyzed using SPSS version 12. Apart from the Perceptual learning style which had visual, auditory, kinaesthetic and tactile (VAK), the five stimulation of learning styles by Dunn and Dunn (1978) which had Environmental, Emotional, Sociological, Physical and Psychological used in this studies to evaluate learning styles among students. The result indicated that students' learning styles are mainly related to Emotional category (mean 3.91, SD=0.48), VAK learning style (mean 3.68, SD=0.43), Sociological category (mean 3.63, SD=0.51), Psychological category (mean 3.33, SD=0.53), Physical category (mean 3.17, SD=0.53) and Environmental category (mean 3.15, SD=0.34). Findings from the study also indicated that there is no significant difference in learning styles based on gender. Results are also indicated that there is a relationship between achievement in English subject and perceptual learning style (VAK). The different learning styles and study attitudes level adopted by students have direct influence in students' orientations and approaches in learning. Based on the results, several recommendations are given to enhance teaching and students' learning effectiveness 2010 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4767/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4767/1/s802693.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4767/2/s802693_abstract.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000802763 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Hamid Mahmood & Noor Aina Dani. (1994). Pengaruh bahasa ibunda dalam proses pemelajaran Bahasa Melayu di kalangan pelajar Dusun. Jurnal Dewan Bahasa, September: 772-786. Abdullah Hassan. (1986). Linguistik am untuk guru Bahasa Malaysia. Petaling Jaya: Penerbit Fajar Bakti. Abdullah Mohd. Nor. (1982). Bahasa Inggeris - bila patut mula diajar di sekolah. Dlm. Ibrahim Saad (pnyt..). Isu pendidikan di Malaysia, hlm. 122-129, Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Abu Talib Abdullah. (1998). Gaya dan strategi pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu di kalangan pelajar tingkatan 4 daerah Johor Baharu. Projek Sarjana Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Abdul Razak Ahmad. (1999). Hubungan antara gaya pembelajaran dengan pencapaian mata pelajaran Sejarah dari segi etnik dan lokasi sekolah. Projek Sarjana Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Abdul Razak Habib & Rashidi Azizan. (1997). Hubungan antara stail pembelajaran dengan pencapaian Sains dan Matematik sekolah menengah rendah. Jurnal Pendidikan 22: 39-49. Alias Baba. (1990). Statistik penyelidikan dalam pendidikan dan sains sosial. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Alias Baba & Chong, M.L. (1992). Hubungan di antara stail kognitif dengan jantina, aliran dan kesannya terhadap pencapaian akademik pelajar. Jurnal Pendidikan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. 17: 61-73. Aminah Suboh. (2000). Hubungan antara faktor persekitaran keluarga dan pencapaian akademik pelajar sekolah menengah. Latihan ilmiah Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Anthony F. Grasha (1996). Teaching with style. A practical guide to enhancing and learning styles. University of Cincinnati: Alliance Publishes. Asiah Hj. Pariekutty. (1999). Gaya pembelajaran dan pencapaian akademik pelajar tingkatan 4 Sekolah Menengah Teknik Juasseh, Kuala Pilah, Negeri Sembilan. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Malaya. Atan Long (1988). Psikologi Pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka Au S.Y. (1988). A critical appraisal of Gardner's social-psychologycal theory of second language learning. Language learning, 38: 75-100. Babich, A.M., Burdine, P. Allbright, L., Randal. (1975). The Center for Innovative Teaching experiences C.I.T.E. Learning Styles Instrument. Wichita Public Schools Murdock Teacher Center. Baharin Abu, Othman Md. Johan, Syed Mohd Shafea Syed & Haliza Jaafar. (2007). Kepelbagaian gaya pembelajaran dan kemahiran belajar pelajar Universiti di Fakulti Pendidikan, UTM Johor. Vot penyelidikan 71881. Jabatan asas pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Bass, G.M. clan Greay, W.T. (1996). Education Research Abstracts. Accounting Education, (1), 238-242. Bazitah Bt Abu Bakar. (2006). Hubungan Gaya Pembelajaran Dengan Pencapian Akademik: Tinjauan Di Tiga Buah Madrasah Sepenuh Masa Di Singapura. Tesis Sarjana UTM, Johor. Bell, M.E. (1972). Learning and Instruction: Theory Into Practice. New York: Macmillan Publishing Company. Best J. W. & Kahn, J. W. (1986): Research in education. Ed. 6. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Burton, N., Middlewood, D. & Blatchford, R. (2001). Models of Curriculum Organization. In D. Middlewood & N. Burton (Eds.) Managing the Curriculum University of Leicester. Educational Management Development Unit, London, Paul Chapman, pp.18-34 Blair, T.K., Jones, B.S., Simpson. G.K. (1991). Training Second Language Teacher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Brockett, R. G. (1985). The relationship between self-directed learning readiness and life satisfaction among older students. Adult Education Quarterly 35(4): 210-219. Brockett, R.G. & Hiemstra, R. (1991). Self-direction in adult learning: Perspectives on theory, research and practice. New York: Routledge. Brookfield, S.D. (1985). Self-directed learning: A critical review of research. In: Brookfield. S.D. (ed.). Self-directed learning: From theory to Practice. New directions for continuing education, 25, pp. 5-16 San Francisco: Jossey Bass. Brown, J.D. (1988). Understanding research in second language learning: a teacher's guide to statistics and research design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Byram, M., Morgan, C. et al. (1994). Teaching and learning language and culture. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters. Can field, A.A. (1977). Learning Style Inventory Manual. Plymouth: Humanies Inc. Carmen, R.A. dan Adams, W.R. (1984). Study Skill- Canada: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Chamot, A. U. (1987). The learning strategies of ESL students. In: Wenden, A. & Rubin, J. (eds.). Learning strategies in language learning, pp. 71-83. New York: Prentice Hall. Chithra a/p Raju. (2003). Sikap dan motivasi pelajar India dalam pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu sebagai bahasa kedua. Projek Sarjana Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. Chomsky, N. (1965). Aspects of the theory of syntax. M.I.T. Press. Cook V. (1991). Second language learning and language teaching. London: Edward Arnord. David Middlewood, Neil Burton and Blatcford. (2001). Managing The curriculum, SAGE Publication, City Road London ECIY ISP. (P-19). Dunn, R. (1984). Learning Style : State Of the Science. Journal Of Higher Education. 23(1): 10-19. Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1978). Teaching Student Through Their Individual Learning Styles: The Centre for the Study of Learning and Teaching Styles. St. John's University. Jamaica, New York. Dunn, R. & Dunn, K. (1979). Learning Styles/Teaching Styles: Should they ..... can they be matched?. Educational Leadership. January, 238-244. Dunn, R. & Dunn, K. (1980). What Is Your Child Learning Style? The Newletter of Parenting. 3(1): 4-58. Dasima Abd. Wahab. (1999). A study of students attitudes differences in learning literature in English: A factor of gender. Latihan llmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. Dornyei, Z. (1990). Conceptualizing motivation in foreign language learning. Language Learning, 40: 45-78. Erhan Ertekin, Bulent Dilmac, And Ersen Yazici. (2009). The relationship between Mathematics anxiety and learning styles of preservice Mathematics teachers. Selcuk University, Konya, Turkey. Ee Ah Meng. (1989). Pendidikan di Malaysia untuk guru pelatih. Petaling Jaya: Penerbit Fajar Bakti. Ellington, B.T. & Earl, V.R. (1999). Some issues in improving the quality of educational. Comparative Educational, 14(1): 41-58. Faridah Anum Ismail. (2001). Attitudes and motivation of form 2 student of Sekolah Kebangsaan Seksyen 16, Shah Alam. Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. Frankel, J. R. & Wallen, N.E. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education. Edisi Kedua, New York: McGraw-Hill Inc. Garger, S. dan Guild, P. (1984). Learning Style: The Crucial Differences. Curriculum Review, 23(1), 9-12. Gardner, R.C. & Lambert W.E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, Mass: New Bury House Publishers. Gardner, R.C. & MacIntyre P.D. (1993). On the measurement of affective variable in second language learning. Language learning, 43(2): 157-194. Gardner, R.C. & Smythe. (1975). Second language learning: A social-psychological perspective. Canadian modem language review 32: 198-213. Gardner, R.C. (1982). Language attitudes and language learning. Dlm. Ryan, E.B. & Giles, H. (pnyt.) Attitudes towards language variation: Social and applied contexts, hlm. 132-147. London: Edward Arnold Pub. Ltd. Gardner, R.C. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitudes and motivation. London: Edward Arnold. Godleski, E.S. (1984). Learning Style Compatibility of Engineering Students and Faculty. Proceedings Annual Frontiers In Education Conference, ASEE/IEEE, Philadelphia, 362 Griggs, S.A. (1991). Learning Styles Counseling. Ann Arbor, MI: ERIC Counseling and Personnel Services Clearing House. The University of Michigan. Hamzah Bin Nun (1999). Gaya Pembelajaran Pelajar Di UTM. Tesis Sarjana. UTM, Johor. Hayes, N. (2000). Doing psychology research. Philadelphia: Open University Press. Hassan Ahmad. (1999). Dasar bahasa dan pembangunan negara di Malaysia. Dewan Bahasa, 43(9): 783-795. Haris Md. Jadi. (1990). Etnik politik dan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Hii Siong Ting (2006). Gaya Pembelajaran Sains Tahun 5 Fakulti Pendidikan, UTM. Tesis Sarjana Muda. UTM, Johor. Honey, P. & Mumford, A. (1992). The Manual Of Leaming Styles. Edisi Kedua. United Kingdom: Peter Honey. Honey, P. & Mumford, A. (1992). Using your Learning Styles. Maidenhead: Peter Honey. Honey, P. dan Mumford, A. (1983). Using Your Learning Styles. Maidenhead: Peter Honey. Honey, P. dan Mumford. (1992). The Manual of Limning Stye. (2nd ed.), United Kingdom: Peter Honey. Hyeok Kang. (1999). Learning Style Preferences Of Korean High School Students. Tesis Sarjana Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur. IIknur Pekkanli Egel. (2009). English Language Learning And Teaching Style In Two Turkish Primary Schools. Uludag University, Bursa, Turkey. 37(8), 1117-1128. Jenny Leach & Bob Moon. (1999). learners & Pedagogy. Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd. and The Open University of London. Joseph Gomez. (2000).Gaya Pembelajaran: Satu Tijauan Literatur. Jurnal Pendidikan Jilid 2: Bi1.3. Jabatan Ilmu Pendidikan, MPSK. Juriah Long. (2002). Pendidikan Bahasa Melayu: Antara hasrat dengan pelahaman. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Kamsiah Abdullah. (1987). Sikap dan motivasi - sebagai pemboleh ubah dalam pemelajaran bahasa. Dewan Bahasa, 903-918. Keith, T. Z. (1982). Time spent on homework and high school achivement. Journal of Educational Psychology 74: 248-253. Keefe, J. W. (1979). School application of learning style concept. Student Learning Style: Diagnosing and prescribing programs. 18-25. Reston: National Association of Secondary School Principals. Keefe, J. W. (1991). Learning Style: Cognitive and thinking skill. Reston, VA: National Association of Secondary school, Principals. Khalid Abdullah, Rosadah Abd Majid & Abdul Razak Habib. (1999). Modul Pengajaran Kaedah Matematik. Pusat Pengajian Jarak Jauh (PJJ). Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Kline, P. (1992). The eve& genim restoring children's natural joy of learning. Artlington, Virginia: Great Ocean publishers. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning. Englewood cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. McCarthy, B. 1987. The 4 MAT System: Teaching to learning style with right left mode technique. Barrington Illinois: Excel ASCD. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2000). Kajian tahap penguasaan bahasa Inggeris di kalangan pelajar sekolah menengah bantuan kerajaan. Kuala Lumpur: Bahagian Perancangan dan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia (2007). Surat Pekeliling Perkhidmatan Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia, Bil. 2. Bahagian Sumber Manusia, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Lee, M.F. (2001). Pola Gaya Pembelajaran Pelajar dan Gaya Pengajaran Guru Dikalangan Pelajar dan Guru Sekolah-Sekolah Menengah Akademik Daerah Johor Bahru - Satu Kajian Kes. Tesis Sarjana Muda UTM, Johor. Low Xin Xin. (2003). Pola Gaya Pembelajaran Pelajar-pelajar Di Kelas Lukisan Kejuruteraan Sekolah Menengah Sains Muar. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Laporan PSM. Tidak diterbitkan. Mohd Majid Konting. (1998). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Miles, M.M. & Hubeman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Mohd Najib Abdul Ghaffar. (1999). Penyelidikan Pendidikan. Skudai: Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Mohd Nor Long. (1982). Perkernbangan pelajaran di Sabah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohd Rasdi Saamah. (2003). Kesediaan guru-guru sekolah rendah melaksanakan perubahan bahasa pengantar mata pelajaran Sains dan Matematik. Projek Sarjana Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. Nabihah Badar. (2003). Perbandingan Preferen Stail Belajar Di Kalangan Pelajar Bepencapaian Tinggi dan Rendah Matapelajaran Fizik. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan. Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur. Nancy Phang Kong Ming. (2006). Pola Gaya Pembelajaran Felder&Silverman Dikalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat Aliran Teknik Sekolah Menengah Teknik Kluang: Satu Kajian Kes. Tesis Sarjana Muda. UTM, Johor. Nathesan. S. (1992). Bahasa Melayu di Sabah: Penakatan dan pemantapan penggunaannya. Dewan Bahasa; 803-811. Naina Mohd. B. Md. Noor. (2000). Stail Pengajaran Guru Dan Gaya Pembelajaran Murid. Jurnal Pendidikan. Jabatan Ilmu Pendidikan, MPSA. Kedah. Ng Sook Chin. (2005). Relationship Between Learning Styles and Understanding of Selected Chemical Concepts Among Pre-University Science Students. Tesis Sarjana. Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur. Norlia T. Goolamally. (2000). Hubungan Antara Gaya Belajar Dengan Pencapaian Matematik Dan Pencapaian Akademik Di Kalangan Pelajar Tingkatan Empat. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan, Kuala Lumpur, Universiti Malaya. Norlia Abd, Aziz, T. Subahan M. Meerah, Lilia Halim, Kamisah Osman. (2006). Hubungan antara motivasi, gaya pembelajaran dengan pencapaian Matematik Tambahan tingkatan 4. Jurnal Pendidikan 31(2006) 123-141. Normah Mohamed. (2002, Ogos 18). Sedia kemudahan majukan Bahasa Inggeris. Mingguan Malaysia, p, 14. Nurhizam Abdul Manab. (1995). Sikap Terhadap Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggeris Dan Hubungannya Dengan Pencapaian Pelajar-Pelajar Tingkatan Dua Di Daerah Kuala Terengganu. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan, Kuala Lumpur: Universiti Malaya. Payne, E. B. (2000). Teaching styles of faculty and learning styles of their students: Congruent versus incongruent teaching styles with regard to academic disciplines and gender. Doctoral dissertation, Kent State University, Graduate School of Education, USA. UMI Publications. Pinsent, A. (1969). Principles of teaching method with special reference to secondary education (3rd Ed.). London: Harrap. Rahil Mahyuddin, Abdul Majid Mohd. Isa, Zaidatoi Akmaliah Lopie Pihie. (1995). Asas Pendidikan II: Psikologi Dalam Bilik Dajah. Malaysia: Longman. Reid, J. (1987). The Learning Style Preference of ESL Students. TESOL Quarterly, 21(2), 87-111. Rohaida Musa (2002). A study on students attitudes towards learning English in rural school. Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi. Ramona Tang. (1999). The place "culture" in the foreign language classroom: a reflection. (atas talian). http://iteslj.org/Articles/Tang-Culture.html. (13 Julai 2003). Robiah Sidin. (1998). Pemikiran dalam pendidikan. Shah Alam: Penerbit Fajar Bakti. Saedah Siraj, Ahmad Sabri Shuib. (2004). Preferen Pelajar Terhadap Teknik Pengajaran Guru. Jurnal Pendidikan. Universiti Malaya. Schumann, J.H. (1978). Second language acquisition: The pidginization process. Dlm. Hatch E.M. (pnyt.). Second language acquisition, hlm. 78-90. Newbury House. Siti Hawa Munji. (1987). Kajian Penggunaan Teknik Belajar Oleh Pelajar-pelajar Universiti Pertanian Malaysia Cawangan Sarawak. Sarawak: Universiti Pertanian Malaysia. Siti Hawa Munji. (1989). Strategi Belajar: Lulus Peperiksaan. K.Lumpur: Usaha C & L Sdn. Bhd. Siti Hawa Munji. (1990). Pengantar Psikologi Petaling Jaya: Penerbit Fajar Bakti. Slavin R.E. (1991). Educational psychologv: Theory into practice. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Sharifah Alwiah Alsagoff (1987). Psikologil Pendidikan II. Kuala Lumpur: Longman Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. Smith, L.H. dan Renzulli, J.S. (1984). Learning Style Preferences: A Practical Approach for Classroom Teachers. Theory in Practice, 23, 144-50. Tobias, C. U. (1996). "Cara Mereka Belajar." Indonesia: Harvest Publishing House. Welton, D., & Mallan, J. T. (1999). Children and their world: Strategies for teaching social studies. New York: Houghton Mifflin Co. Wiersma, W. (2000). Research methods in educational an introduction. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Wilson, V. (1998). Learning how they learn: A review of the literature on learning styles. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 427 017. Yee Mei Heong. (2002). Pola Gaya Pembelajaran Di Kalangan Pelajar Sekolah Menengah Teknik di Daerah Negeri Johor. Universiti Teknologi Malaysia: Laporan PSM. Tidak diterbitkan. Zamri Maharnod & Zarina Othman. (2001). Sikap pelajar Cina terhadap pembelajaran Bahasa Melayu sebagai bahasa kedua Dewan Bahasa, Februari: 40-43. Zulkifley Hamid. (1998). Bahasa Melayu sebagai bahasa kedua: Mencari arah. Pelita Bahasa. November: 48-49.

Similar Items