Tahap kompentensi dan masalah Penolong Kanan Kokurikulum dalam pengurusan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah Daerah Asajaya, Samarahan, Sarawak

Tahap kompentensi dan masalah Penolong Kanan Kokurikulum dalam pengurusan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah Daerah Asajaya, Samarahan, Sarawak

The main purpose of the study is to identify the level of competency among senior cocurricular assistants and their levels of problems in managing cocurricular activities. Research samples consisted of 30 senior cocurricular assistants and 300 cocurricular teachers in primary school of Asajaya�...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Zulkeplee @ Ibrahim, Meni
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2010
Subjects:
LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4772/1/s802786.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4772/2/s802786_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4772
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Dali, Mohd. Hasani
topic LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Zulkeplee @ Ibrahim, Meni
Tahap kompentensi dan masalah Penolong Kanan Kokurikulum dalam pengurusan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah Daerah Asajaya, Samarahan, Sarawak
description The main purpose of the study is to identify the level of competency among senior cocurricular assistants and their levels of problems in managing cocurricular activities. Research samples consisted of 30 senior cocurricular assistants and 300 cocurricular teachers in primary school of Asajaya's District, Samarahan Division, Sarawaic Data on the competency level of senior awistants and their level of cocurricular management problems were collected through two perceptions (a) perceptions from senior cocurricular assistants, and (b) perception from cocurricular teachers. Cocurricular management problems were tackled based on the principles of management, which are planning, directing, controlling and evaluating. Questionnaire using Likert scale was used as a survey method to collect and analysis the data. Pilot study conducted in this research showed high reliability. SPSS 16.0 software used to analyze data and translated to be understood and thus implemented wisely and properly. Data were analyzed using descriptive (mean, standard deviation, ranking, frequency, and percentage) and inferential statistical tests (t-test, ANOVA one tailed, and Correlation Pearson Test). This study showed that senior cocurricular assistants demonstrated high competency level. The level of cocurricular management problems faced by senior cocurricular assistants were low from the points of view of both senior d c u l a r assistants and cocurricular teachers. Overall results of this study indicate that the Senior Assistant Cocurriculum has a high level of competency and level of problem management practices Senior Assistant Co-curriculum is at the level of medium and low according to the perception Senior Assistant Co-Curricular and co-curricular teachers. All theories, concepts and plans in this study is expected and recommended that it be adopted by those concerned to plan a change of mind to elevate educational visionary of education
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Zulkeplee @ Ibrahim, Meni
author_facet Zulkeplee @ Ibrahim, Meni
author_sort Zulkeplee @ Ibrahim, Meni
title Tahap kompentensi dan masalah Penolong Kanan Kokurikulum dalam pengurusan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah Daerah Asajaya, Samarahan, Sarawak
title_short Tahap kompentensi dan masalah Penolong Kanan Kokurikulum dalam pengurusan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah Daerah Asajaya, Samarahan, Sarawak
title_full Tahap kompentensi dan masalah Penolong Kanan Kokurikulum dalam pengurusan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah Daerah Asajaya, Samarahan, Sarawak
title_fullStr Tahap kompentensi dan masalah Penolong Kanan Kokurikulum dalam pengurusan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah Daerah Asajaya, Samarahan, Sarawak
title_full_unstemmed Tahap kompentensi dan masalah Penolong Kanan Kokurikulum dalam pengurusan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah Daerah Asajaya, Samarahan, Sarawak
title_sort tahap kompentensi dan masalah penolong kanan kokurikulum dalam pengurusan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah daerah asajaya, samarahan, sarawak
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2010
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4772/1/s802786.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4772/2/s802786_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827798189277184
spelling my-uum-etd.47722015-07-23T06:58:12Z Tahap kompentensi dan masalah Penolong Kanan Kokurikulum dalam pengurusan kokurikulum di sekolah-sekolah Daerah Asajaya, Samarahan, Sarawak 2010 Zulkeplee @ Ibrahim, Meni Dali, Mohd. Hasani College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB2801-3095 School administration and organization The main purpose of the study is to identify the level of competency among senior cocurricular assistants and their levels of problems in managing cocurricular activities. Research samples consisted of 30 senior cocurricular assistants and 300 cocurricular teachers in primary school of Asajaya's District, Samarahan Division, Sarawaic Data on the competency level of senior awistants and their level of cocurricular management problems were collected through two perceptions (a) perceptions from senior cocurricular assistants, and (b) perception from cocurricular teachers. Cocurricular management problems were tackled based on the principles of management, which are planning, directing, controlling and evaluating. Questionnaire using Likert scale was used as a survey method to collect and analysis the data. Pilot study conducted in this research showed high reliability. SPSS 16.0 software used to analyze data and translated to be understood and thus implemented wisely and properly. Data were analyzed using descriptive (mean, standard deviation, ranking, frequency, and percentage) and inferential statistical tests (t-test, ANOVA one tailed, and Correlation Pearson Test). This study showed that senior cocurricular assistants demonstrated high competency level. The level of cocurricular management problems faced by senior cocurricular assistants were low from the points of view of both senior d c u l a r assistants and cocurricular teachers. Overall results of this study indicate that the Senior Assistant Cocurriculum has a high level of competency and level of problem management practices Senior Assistant Co-curriculum is at the level of medium and low according to the perception Senior Assistant Co-Curricular and co-curricular teachers. All theories, concepts and plans in this study is expected and recommended that it be adopted by those concerned to plan a change of mind to elevate educational visionary of education 2010 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4772/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4772/1/s802786.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4772/2/s802786_abstract.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000801412 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Ab. Alim Abdul Rahim. 1995. Siri pendidikun perguruan: pengurusan kokurikulum. Kuala Lumpur: Penerbit Fajar Bakti. Abdul Aziz Abd Rahman. 1994. Falsafah dan teknik pengurusan. Kuala Lumpur: Berita Publishing Sdn. Bhd. Abdul Shukor Abdullah. 1993. Kecemerlangan pendidikan: Status clan cabaran. Seminar Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. Abdul Shukor Abdullah. 1995. Membina sekolah yang berkesan: Aplikasi dasar. Seminar Sekolah Efektif. Institut Aminuddin Baki, Sri Layang Genting Highlands, Pahang. Abdul Shukor Abdullah. 1996. Membii sekolah yang berkesan: Pengurusan setempat 'Empowerment' dan kepimpinan sebagai inisiatif polisi. Seminar Sekolah Efektif. Kali Kedua. Institut Aminuddin Baki, Genting Highlands, 14-16 November. Abdul Shukor Abdullab. 1998. Pengetua berkesan: Sekolah berkesan cabaran pembangunan sistem pendidikan negara. Kertas kerja. IAB, Genting Highlands, 3 Mac. Abdul Shukor Abdullah. 1999. Surat KP (BS-SBP) 8575-196 Jld. IV(26). Ali bin Ismail. 2000. Tinjauan pengurusan dan pentadbiran program aktiviti kokurikulum sukan dan permainan di sekolah-sekolah menengah Negara Brunei Darussalam. Projek sarjana. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Alias Baba. 1992. Statistik penyelidikan untuk pendidikan dun sains sosial. Bangi: Penerbitan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Alias Abdul Samad. 1999. Peranan dan penglibatan pengetua dalam mempertingkatkan disiplin pelajar di sekolah menengah Felda Daerah Tampin Negeri Sembilan. Projek Penyelidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Amstrong, M & Baron, A. 2000. Performance management. London: Chartered Institute of Personal and Development. Anastasia, A. 1982. Psychological testing. New York: William and Sons Inc. Austin, A.E. 1996. Issues in Faculty Worklife. In A. bagley (ed.). The school of education as a workplace (pp. 7-19). MN: SPE Monograph sereis. Azizah Nordin. 1990. Mengenal pasti masalah-masalah dalam pelaksanaan aktiviti kokurikulum di tiga buah sekolah menengah di daerah Gombak. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Bahagian Perancangan clan Penyelidikan Dasar Pendidikan Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 1992. Kajian tugas guru besar, penolong kanan I, penolong kanan II, penolong kanan kokurikulumm, penyelia petang dan guru-guru sekolah rendah. Baldwin, L., Coney, F., Fardig, D., & Thomas,R 1993. School effectiveness questionnaire manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation. Barker, Sandra. 1997. Is your successor in your schoolhouse? Finding principle candidates. NASSP Bulletin, 85-91. Bass Bernard M. 1990. Bass and Stodgill's hand book of leadership theory, research and managerial application. (Ed. Ke-3) New York: The Free Press. Berita Harian. 2002.6 Disember. Blandford, S. 1995. Pengurusan peringkat pertengahan di sekolah - Bagaimana menyelaraskan pengurusan dan pengajaran untuk sekolah yang efektif. Kuala Lumpur: Institut Terjemahan Negara Malaysia Berhad. Boyatzis, RE., McBer and company. 1982. The competent manager: A model for effective performance. New York: A Wiley-Interscience Publication John Wiley & Sons. Bropphy, J.E. and Good, T.L. 1986. Teacher behaviour and student achievement In Handbook of research on teaching. Dalam Wittrock M.C.(pnyt), New York Macmillan. Cohen, M. 1983. Instructional management and social conditions in effective schools, in school finance and school improvement Linkages in the I980s, edited by A. O. Webb and L. D. Webb. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger. Creemers, Bert and Dave Reynolds. 1999. The future development of school effectiveness and school improvement. Dalam Bert Creemers, Tom Peters and Dave Reynolds (Eds), School effectiveness and school improvements. Amsterdam: Swets & Zeitlinger, 379-383. Daresh, J. & Male, T. 2008. Crossing the border into leadership: Experiences of newly appointed British - headteachers and American principals. Journal of the British Educational Management and Administration 28: 89-101. Daud Ibrahim. 2003. Concise student dictionary. Petaling Jaya: Sasbadi. Sdn Bhd. Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. 1999. Kamus Dewan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa & Pustaka. Faridah Karim. 1985. Penggubalan kurikulum untuk kokurikulum: Satu panduan. Seminar Kebangsaan Mengenai Kokurikulum di Universiti Utara Malaysia Geman, Raechel. 1995. Co-curricular involvement characteristics of Bowling Green State University Honors Students. ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 386138. Getzel, J.W. & Guba, E. G. 1957. Social behaviour and the administrative procees. School Review, 65: 423-444. Getzel, J.W. 1960. Theory and practice in educational administration: An old question revisited. Dalam RF. Campbell dm J.M. Lipham (ed.). Administrative theory as a guide. Midwest Administrative Centre: University of Chicago. Halpin, A. W. 1966. Administrative theory in education. Toronto: Macmillan Company. Hawa Hassan. 2001. Peranan pengetua dalam kepemimpinan pengajaran bagi meningkatkan keberkesanan sekolah : Satu tinjauan di Sekolah Menengah Daerah Kluang, Johor. Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Hazi, H.M. 1994. The teacher evaluation- supervision dilemma: A case of entanglements and irreconcilable differences. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision 24(5): 212-217. Hazizi Bin Hassan. 2001. Tahap permasalahan dalam pengajaran dan pembelajaran Pendidikan Jasmani dan Kesihatan. Satu kajian kes di sekolah menengah di daerah Machang. Latihan ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Helfison, D.R. & Templin, T.T. 1991. A reflective approach to teaching physical education. Campaign, IL: Human Kinetics. Hornby, A.S. 2000. Advanced learner's Malay dictionary. Shah Alam: Penerbit Fajar Bakti, Hoy, W. K. & Miskel, C. G. 1991. Educational administration theory, research, and practice. New York: Mc Graw Hill, Inc. Hussein Mahmood. 1991. Kepimpinan pengajaran: Kekangan dan implikasi. Jurnal Guru (3): 193-208. Hussein Mahmood. 1993. Kepimpinan dan keberkesanan sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Ibrahim Ahmad Bajunid. 1995. Peningkatan pelbagai jenis literasi, khususnya literasi saintifik dan teknikal ke arah pemantapan martabat kepimpinan. Jurnal Pengurusan Pendidikan Institut Aminuddin Baki 14(2): 1-9. Jaafar Muhamad. 1999. Kelakuan organisasi. Ed. Ke-3. Kuala Lumpur: Leeds Publications. Jamil Ahmad. 1993. Tinjauan kekangan-kekangan dalam pelaksanaan sains KBSM di sekolah-sekolah di negeri Kedah Darul Aman. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan. Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Jegadeva, K. 1990. Guru besar dan pengurusan KBSR: Kelemahan dan kekuatan. Seminar Kurikulum Baru Sekolah Rendah, Institut Aminuddin Baki: Genting Highlands. Johannsen, H. & Page, G.T. 1996. International dictionary of management. Ed. Ke-5. London: Kogan Page. Jones, A. 1988. Leadership for tomorrow's school. Oxford: Basil Balckwell. Kamaruzzaman Ismail. 2000. Tahap penggunaan komputer di kalangan pengajar dm pelajar dalam pengajian dan pembelajaran di sebuah Institusi Pengajian Tinggi Swasta, Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Katz, D. & Kahn, R L. 1966. The social psychology of organization. New Yo& John Wiley & Sons. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 1985. Surat Pekeliling Ikhtisas Bil. 1/1985. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia 1988. Surat Pekeliling Ikhtisas Bil. 7/1988. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia 1992. Buku penerangan kurikulum bersepadu sekolah menengah Kuala Lumpur: KPM. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. 1993. Buku panduan pengurusan profesional sekolah menengah oleh Jemaah Nazir Sekolah Persekutuan. KL: Malindo Pronters Sdn. Bhd. Kementerian Sumber Manusia 2003. Penilaian Tahap Kecekapan. Bahagian Sumber Manusia. Kenneth G. Tillman. 1997. The administration of pyhsical education, sports and leisure programs. Massachussett: Needham Height. Klemp, G.O., Jr. 1980. The assessment of occupational competence. (Ed.). Report to the National Institute of Education, Washington, DC. Koontz, H. & Weihrich. H. 1997. Penguman. Terj. Kuala Lumpur Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Krejeie, R. V. & Morgan, D. W. 1970. Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psycological Measurement. 30: 607-610. Lacy, A.C. Lablaster, K.J. & Tommaney, W.J. 1996. Teacher behaviors and student academic learning time in elementaryphysical education. The physical educator. 53(1), 44-50. Laporan Jawatankuasa Kabinet. 1979. Mengkaji pelaksanaan dasar pelajaran Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Kuala Lurnpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Leith, L.M. 1990. Coaches guides to sport administration. Champaign. Illinois: Leisure Press. Lian Yoke Peng. 1990. Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi pilihan mahasiswa Kamsis Aminuddin Baki Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Dalam Aktiviti Kokurikulum Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Locke E. and Latham, G.P. 1991. A theory of goal setting and task perfionnance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Longman. 1995. Dictionary of contemporary English. London: Longman Group. Mahfol Basiron. 1999. Tijauan pengurusan dm pengelolaan kokurikulum sukan dan permainan di sekolah-sekolah menengah daerah Hulu Langat, Selangor Darul Ehsan. Projek Sarjana. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Malek Shah & Liew Swee Liang. 2002. Model kompetensi dan perkhidmatan awam Malaysia Jurnal Pengurusan Awam. 1. (Bil. 2): Hlm 1-15. Mohammed Sani Ibrahim. 1998. Perancangan dan strategi pelaksanaan latihan guru-guru sekolah bestari. Kertas kerja Seminar Isu-Isu Pendidikan Negara. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. 26-27 November. Mohammed Sani Ibrahim. 2002. Guru yang profesional. Kertas edaran untuk kursus rekabentuk latihan dalam pendidik Fakulti Pendidikc Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, 30 Mac. Mohammed Sani Ibrahim. 2000(b). Tahap kesediaan guru-guru cemerlang dalam menghasilkan perancangan dan pengajaran yang cemerlaag di bilik darjah untuk kepelbagaian pelajar. Seminar Pendidikan Kebangsaan 2000, Bangi, 14-15 November. Mohd Majid Konting. 1998. Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohd Yassin Hj. Sulaiman. 1994. Amalan kokurikulum Persatuan Agama Islam dan Puteri Islam di dua buah sekolah rendah di Shah Alam. Unpublished master's thesis, University of Malaya. Mohd. Izani Mohd Zain. 2001. Harapan dalam meritokrasi, Dewan Masyarakat. Oktober 2001. Jilid 39. Bil 10(52-53). Mohd. Majid Konting. 1994. Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Ed. Ke-3. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Mohd. Sahandri Gani Hj. Hamzh. 1995. Kajian pertalian antara penapian akadernik dengan kemahiran kerja praktik dan konsep kendiri akademik di kalangan pelajar kemahiran hidup bersepadu. Tesis Sarjana Pendidikan. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Mohd. Salleh Lebar. 2000. Pentadbiran pendidikan dan pendidikan di Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur: Addison Wesley Longman Malaysia Sdn. Bhd. Nasiriah Md Yusuff. 2001. Latihan dalam perkhidmatan : Bidang keperluan di kalangan Guru Kanan Mata Pelajaran. Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Neela Mehan Manickiam & Amer Hamzah Jantan. 1998. Perkembangan pengurusan di dalam Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia: Paradigma baru dan anjakan kritikal. Seminar Pengurusan Sumber Manusia Kali Pertama, Institut Aminuddin Baki, Genting Highlands, 14-17 Disember. Nor Aishah Buang. 2002. Asas keusahaan. Shah Alam: Penerbit Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Norhunaini Tahir. 2001. Peranan guru kanan mata pelajaran : Masalah dan keperluan kursus peningkatan profesionalisme. Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Oldroyd, D. Elsner, D. & Poster, C. 1996. Educational management today. London: Paul Chapman. Omardin Ashaari. 1999. Pengurusan sekolah : Satu panduan lengkap. Kuala Lumpur: Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Ooi Hon Bu. 1998. Prestasi Kegiatan kokurikulum dengan pencapaian Akadernik, Latihan Ilmiah: Sintok UUM, Kedah. Pramela Krish, 1996. Co-curricular Activities Among Students in a Secondary School in Selangor. Unpublished Master's Thesis. University of Malaya. Purkey, S.D. & Smith, M.S.. 1983. Effective schools: A review, Elementary School Joumal 83(4): 427-452. Quai Lai Ha 2000. Perceptions towards tha evaluation of co-curricular activities in Klang secondary schools. Unpublished Master's Thesis. University of Malaya. Rahimah Hj. Ahmad & Zulkifli Abdul Manaf. 1997. Characteristics of effective and less effective schools: A case study from Malaysia. Kertas Kerja 10th Annual Congress For School Effectiveness And Improvement, Memphis, Tennesse USA, 5-8 Januari. Ramaiah, Al. 1995. Kepimpinan pendidikan cabaran masa kini. Petaling Jaya: IBS Buku Sdn. Bhd. Robiah Sidin. 1998. Asas pentadbiran pendidikan. Edisi Kedua. Petaling Jaya: Pustaka Cipta Sdn. Bhd. Rosland Kamarudin. 2000. Persepsi guru-guru kanan terhadap pengetua di dalam pengurusan kewangan sekolah. Projek Penyelidikan Sarjana Pendidikan. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Sabariah Md. Yusof. 1995. Penghargaan kendiri dan pencapaian akademik: Kajian di kalangan wanita. Latihan Ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsam Malaysia. Sallis, J.F. 1994. Physical activity guidelines for akolescents. Pediatric Exercise Science 6(4): 7-10. Sergiovanni, Thomas. 1991. Leadership and excellent in schooling. Educational Leadership. 41(5): 4-13. Sh. Zahrah bt Syed Hassani. 1997. Perkembangan profesionalisme pengetua sekolah menengah. Projek Penyelidikan Sarjana Pendidikan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Silverman, S. 1998. Student characteristics, practice and achievement in physical education. Journal of educational research, 87(1), 54-61. Siti Rapiah Abd. Rahman. 1999. Co-curricular and its influence on the quality of student life. Unpublished Master's Thesis. University of Malaya. Smith, A.W. 1997. Learning is a living system: Learning leaders and organization. Human System Management 16(4): 277. Sophan Romy Bin Shamiun. 2001. Permadahan dalam pengajaran Pendidikan Jasmani: Satu tinjauan di Tuaran, Kota Kinabalu. Latihan ilmiah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Spencer, L.M. & Spencer, S.M. 1993. Competence at work Model for superior performance. New York: J.Wiley & Son. Strand, B.N., Scantling, E. & Johnson, M. 1997. Fitness education: Teaching concepts based fitness in the schools. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Taylor, F. W. 1947. Principles of scientific management. New York : Harper dalam Hoy dan Miskel 1991. Educational Administration Theory Research Practise. Ed 4. New York: McGraw Hill. The Sunday Times. 2000. 12 March. "Up Your CCA Marks, Get Set, Go". Thierauf, F.J., Klekamp, R.C. dan Geeding, D.W. 1979. Management principles and practices: A contingency and questionnaire approach. John Wiley and Sons, New York. Treasury Board of Canada (December 1999). Framework for competency-based management in the public service of Canada. Retrieved July 2002, fiom http:///www.tbs-sct.gc.ca_. Wan Mohd Zahid Mohd Noordin. 1994. Wawasan pendidikan: Agenda pengisian. Kuala Lumpur: Cahaya Pantai Publishing (M) Sdn. Bhd. Wan Mohd. Zahid Mohd. Nordin. 1993. Wawasan pendidikan: Agenda pengisian. Kuala Lumpur: Nurin Enterprise. Warnoh Katiman. 1998. Penglibatan guru-guru dalam program perkembangan profesionalisme perguruan ke arah pencapaian pendidikan cemerlang di abad 21, seminar isu-isu pendidikan negara, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 26-27 November. Wee Eng Hoe. 1994. Organisasi dan pentadbiran sukan dan pendidikan jasmani. Shah Alam: Penerbit Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Wiersma, W. 2000. Research methods in education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Wilson, J.B. 1985. Towards a more organization only effective: Training strategy and practice. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Zainal Abidin Mohamad. 1999. Pengurusan strategik di sektor pendidikan. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia. Zaidatol Akmaliah Lope Pihie. 1998. Pentadbiran pendidikan. Shah Alam: Penerbitan Fajar Bakti. Zaidatol Akmaliah Lope Phie & Foo Say Fooi. 2003. Pengurusan & kepimpinan pendidikan. Satu langkah ke hadapan. Serdang: Penerbit Universiti Putra Malaysia Zaiton binti Md. Noor (2001). Masalah-masalah yang dihadapi oleh pengetua dan guru besar yang baru dilantik. Projek sarjana. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia

Similar Items