Hubungan antara faktor demografi dengan gaya pengurusan konflik pentadbir sekolah rendah di pendalaman Sarawak

Hubungan antara faktor demografi dengan gaya pengurusan konflik pentadbir sekolah rendah di pendalaman Sarawak

The aim of this study is to find out the relationship between the demographic factors with conflict management styles of primary school administrators in the hinterland of Sarawak. The demographic factors in this study include gender, age, period of service, hierarchical level, and ethnic. The instr...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Suzita, Bahri
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2011
Subjects:
LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/4793/1/s805240.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4793/2/s805240_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.4793
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Mustafa, Ismail
topic LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Suzita, Bahri
Hubungan antara faktor demografi dengan gaya pengurusan konflik pentadbir sekolah rendah di pendalaman Sarawak
description The aim of this study is to find out the relationship between the demographic factors with conflict management styles of primary school administrators in the hinterland of Sarawak. The demographic factors in this study include gender, age, period of service, hierarchical level, and ethnic. The instrument for the conflict management styles used in this study was based on the Two Dimensional Model by Thomas-Kilmann (1974). There are five styles in the model namely, avoiding, collaboration, compromising, accommodation, and competition styles. Respondents in the study were selected from all the school administrators in primary school from hinterland Selangau, Sarawak. The school administrators were the headmaster, the senior assistant (curriculum), senor assistant (student affairs), and senior assistant (co-curriculum). Data collected from the respondents were analyzed using the SPSS version 12 program. Two types of data analysis were used, the descriptive analysis which uses the frequency, mean, and standard deviation, and the inference analysis which uses the t-test, and one way ANOVA. The finding shows that the collaboration styles obtained the highest mean (3.86), followed by the avoiding style with the mean of 3.80, compromising style with the mean of 3.76, accommodation style with the mean of 3.47 and lowest mean of 3.29 for the competition style. From the result there was no significant difference between all the conflict management styles with gender (t (51)= -1.26, p > .05), age (F (5,47) = .75, p > .05), period of service (F (2,50) = .88, p > .05), hierarchical level (F (3,49) + 1.55, p > .05), and ethnic (F (3,49) = 1.7., p > .05) among administrators in primary school in the hinterland of Sarawak
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Suzita, Bahri
author_facet Suzita, Bahri
author_sort Suzita, Bahri
title Hubungan antara faktor demografi dengan gaya pengurusan konflik pentadbir sekolah rendah di pendalaman Sarawak
title_short Hubungan antara faktor demografi dengan gaya pengurusan konflik pentadbir sekolah rendah di pendalaman Sarawak
title_full Hubungan antara faktor demografi dengan gaya pengurusan konflik pentadbir sekolah rendah di pendalaman Sarawak
title_fullStr Hubungan antara faktor demografi dengan gaya pengurusan konflik pentadbir sekolah rendah di pendalaman Sarawak
title_full_unstemmed Hubungan antara faktor demografi dengan gaya pengurusan konflik pentadbir sekolah rendah di pendalaman Sarawak
title_sort hubungan antara faktor demografi dengan gaya pengurusan konflik pentadbir sekolah rendah di pendalaman sarawak
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate 2011
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/4793/1/s805240.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4793/2/s805240_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1776103656487124992
spelling my-uum-etd.47932022-12-13T07:19:08Z Hubungan antara faktor demografi dengan gaya pengurusan konflik pentadbir sekolah rendah di pendalaman Sarawak 2011 Suzita, Bahri Mustafa, Ismail College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) College of Arts and Sciences LB2801-3095 School administration and organization The aim of this study is to find out the relationship between the demographic factors with conflict management styles of primary school administrators in the hinterland of Sarawak. The demographic factors in this study include gender, age, period of service, hierarchical level, and ethnic. The instrument for the conflict management styles used in this study was based on the Two Dimensional Model by Thomas-Kilmann (1974). There are five styles in the model namely, avoiding, collaboration, compromising, accommodation, and competition styles. Respondents in the study were selected from all the school administrators in primary school from hinterland Selangau, Sarawak. The school administrators were the headmaster, the senior assistant (curriculum), senor assistant (student affairs), and senior assistant (co-curriculum). Data collected from the respondents were analyzed using the SPSS version 12 program. Two types of data analysis were used, the descriptive analysis which uses the frequency, mean, and standard deviation, and the inference analysis which uses the t-test, and one way ANOVA. The finding shows that the collaboration styles obtained the highest mean (3.86), followed by the avoiding style with the mean of 3.80, compromising style with the mean of 3.76, accommodation style with the mean of 3.47 and lowest mean of 3.29 for the competition style. From the result there was no significant difference between all the conflict management styles with gender (t (51)= -1.26, p > .05), age (F (5,47) = .75, p > .05), period of service (F (2,50) = .88, p > .05), hierarchical level (F (3,49) + 1.55, p > .05), and ethnic (F (3,49) = 1.7., p > .05) among administrators in primary school in the hinterland of Sarawak 2011 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4793/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4793/1/s805240.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4793/2/s805240_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Balay, R. (2007),Predicting Conflict Management Based on Organizational Commitment and Selected Demographic Variables, Asia Pacific Education Review, Vol. 8, No. 2, m.s. 321-336. Blake, R.R. dan Mouton, J.S. (1964). The Managerial Grid: Key Orientations for Achieving Production through People, Gulf Publising, Houston, TX. Boonsathorn, W. (2007) Understanding conflict management styles of Tais and Americans in multinational corporations in Thailand, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 18 No. 3, m.s. 196-221. Burke, R.J. (1970) Methods of Resolving superior subordinate conflict : The constructive use of subordinate differences and disagreement. Organisational Behavior and Human Performance 5, m.s. 393-411. Cameron, K. S. (1984). The effectiveness of ineffectiveness. Research in Organizational Behavior, 6, m.s. 235-285. Cheng, Yin Cheong (1996). School effectiveness and school-based Management: A Mechanism for Development. The Falmer Press. Deutsch, M.A. (1969). Socially Relevant Science: Reflections on some studies of interpersonal conflict, American Psychologies, vol. 24, m. s. 1076-1092. Deutsch, M.A. (1990). Sixty Years of Conflict, The International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 1, m.s. 237-263. Dirks, K.T. dan Parks, J.P. (2003), " Conflicting stories: the state of the science of conflict", in Greenberg, G. (Ed.), Organizational Behavior: The State of The Science, 2nd ed., Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, m.s. 283-324. Everard, B. dan Moms, G. (1990). Management in Education : Effective School Management (2nd Ed). London, Paul Chapman Publising Fathiyah A.B. (1997). Gaya pengurusan konflik di kalangan pentadbir-pentadbir sekolah menengah daerah Kubang Pasu, Kedah Darul Aman, Ijazah Sarjana Sains Pengurusan UUM. Foo, S.F., & Ngang, T.K. (2005), Faktor-faktor yang menguasai pengurusan kolaboratif, Jurnal Pendidik dan Pendidikan, Jil. 20, m.s. 81-95. Graen, G.B. dan Uhl-Bien, M. (1995) " Relationship-based approach to Leadership: development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over of 25 years: applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective", Leadership Quarterly, Vol. 6 NO. 2, pp. 219-47. Heaney, L.F. (2001) A Question of Management: Conflict, Pressure and Time, The International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 15 No. 4, m.s. 197-203. Henkin, A.B., Cistone, P.J., & Dee, J.R., (2000) Conflict management strategies of principals in site-based managed schools, Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 38 No. 2, m.s. 142-158. Holt, J.L. & DeVore, C.J. (2005), " Culture, gender, organizational role, and styles of conflict resolutions: a meta-analysis", International Journal of Intercultural relations, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 165- 96. Ikoya, P.O. & Akinseinde, S.I., (2009), Variability Pattern in Conflict Management Strategies among School Administrators of Secondary Schools in Nigeria, Journal of Social Science, Vol. 20 No.3, m.s. 223-230. Jamali, B. (2001). Pengurusan Konfik di Sekolah Menengah: Satu Kajian Kes. Tesis Ijazah Doktor Falsafah. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Julaihi Bujang (2008). Merapatkan Jurang Pendidikan Pelaksanaan Teras 4 PPP di Sekolah Kawasan Luar Bandar dan Pedalaman Sarawak: Cabaran dan Cadangan Penambahbaikan dalam Aspek Pembangunan Modal Insan. Dibentangkan dalam Konvensyen Nasional PIPP Kedua (2008) di Institut Aminuddin Baki, Genting Highlands. Johnson, M. (1989). Assertiveness and Cooperativeness as predictors of Interpersonal Conflict Management Behavior. PhD Dissertation. Emery University. Kabanoff, B. (1997), Organizational justice across cultures: Integrating organization level and culture-level perspectives", in Early, P.R. and Erez, M. (Eds), New Perspectives on Industrial/Orgazitional Psychology, New Lexington Press, San Francisco, CA, m.s.676-712. Kamus Komprehensif Bahasa Melayu (2005), Oxford Fajar Sdn. Bhd. Malaysia. Kilmann, R.H., & Thomas, K.W. (1974). Thomas-Kilmann Mode Instrumen, New York, Xicom, Tuxedo. Kim, T., Wang, C., Kondo, M., Kim, T. (2007), Conflict management styles: the differences among the Chinese, Japanese and Koreans, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 18 No. 1, m.s. 23-41. Korabik, K., Baril, G.L. dan Watson, C. (1993), " Managers conflict management style and leadership effectiveness: the moderating effects of gender", Sex Roles, Vol 29 Nos 5-6, m.s. 405-18. Kotter, J. (1988). Power and influence: Beyond Formal Authority. New York: Free Press. Krejcie, R., dan Morgan, D. (1970). "Determining Sample Size for Research Activities", Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, m.s. 605-610. Kriesberg, L. (1973), The Sociology of Social Conflicts, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ. Leung, K. (1997). " Negotiation and reward allocation across culture", in Early, P.R. and Erez, M. (Eds), New Perspectives on Industrial/ Orgazitional Psychology, New Lexington Press, San Francisco, CA, m.s. 640-75. Lokman, M.T., Mohd A.A.R., & Normah A.K., (2008), Gaya Pengurusan Konflik Guru Besar, Jurnal Teknologi, 48(E), mas. 115-127, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Mineoglu, N. (2007), Organizational Conflict and Management: A Study at Schools of Physical Education and Sport in Turkey, Journal of ICHPER.SD, Vol XLIII, No. 2, m.s 5-8. Mohd Foad Sakdan (2005) Pengurusan Konflik Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur. Mohd Majid Konting (1993), Kaedah Penyelidikan Pendidikan, Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka, Kuala Lumpur. Omar Abdull Kareem & Khuan Wai Bing, (2005). Perkembangan Profesional Guru Secara Berterusan; Perspektif Pembangunan Sumber Manusia, Masalah Pendidikan, Universiti Malaya, m.s. 131-141. Pfeffer, J. (1996). Managing with Power: Politics and influence in Organizations. Boston: Harvard Business School Press. Putnam, L.L. dan Wilson, C.E. (1982), " Communication strategies in organizational conflicts: reliability and validity of a measurement scale", in Burgoon, M. (Ed.), Communication Yearbook, Vol. 6, Sage, Beverly Hills, CA, m.s. 629-52. Rahim, M.A. (1992), Managing Conflict in Organizations. znd ed., Praeger, Westport, CT. Posthuma, R.A. White, G.O., Dworkin, J.B., Yanez, O., SwiR, M.S., (2006), Conflict resolution styles between co-workers in US and Mexican cultures, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 17 No. 3, m.s.242-260. Sekaran, Uma (2003). Research Method For Business - A skill Building Approach. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc. Shahibudin Ishak (1997), Pengurusan konflik di kalangan guru-guru di bandar Alor Setar, Kedah Darul Aman, Ijazah Sarjana Sains Pengurusan UUM. Schaubhut, N. A. (2007), Technical Brief for the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument: Description of the Updated Normative Same and Implications for Use, Mountain View, CA: CPP, Inc. Sillars, A.L. (1982), Coding verval Conflict Tactics: Nonverval and perceptual correlates of the avoidance-distributive-intergrative distinction, Human Communication Research, 9, m.s. 83-95 Thomas, K.W., Schaubhut, N. (2008). Conflict styles of men and women at six organization levels, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 19 No. 2, ms. 148-166. Thomas, K.W. (2009). A Brief History of the Thomas-Kilmann Conflict Mode Instrument, http://kilmanndiagnostics.com/tkihistory.html Dicapai pada 8 April 2010. Tjosvold, D. (2006), Defining conflict and making choices about its management Lighting the dark side of organizational life, International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 17 No. 2, m.s. 87-95. Tjosvold, D. (1993). Learning to Manage Conflict: Getting People to Work Together Productively. New York: Lexington Books. Tyler, R. Harrison et al (2006), Competitive and cooperative conflict communication climates The influence of ombuds processes on trust and commitment to the organization, Department of Communication, Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA, International Journal of Conflict Management, Webb, L. & M. Norton. (2003). Human Resources Administration: Personnel Issues and Need in Education. New Jersey: Prentice Hall. Zaleha, M.k. (1996). Hubungan gaya pengurusan konflik dengan jenis personaliti guru-guru asrama di Terengganu, Tesis Ijazah Sarjana Sains (Pengurusan), UUM.

Similar Items