Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua panitia dan komitmen guru di sekolah rendah

This study is conducted to find the relationship between instructional leadership of the subject panel heads and the teachers' commitment in the primary school in Tambun Tulang Area. The study is focusing on several factors such as gender and academic qualification in ascertain whether there a...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Noazli, Abu Bakar
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2009
Subjects:	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/4802/1/s86963.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4802/2/s86963_abstract.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.4802
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Md. Ali, Ruzlan
topic	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization Noazli, Abu Bakar Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua panitia dan komitmen guru di sekolah rendah
description	This study is conducted to find the relationship between instructional leadership of the subject panel heads and the teachers' commitment in the primary school in Tambun Tulang Area. The study is focusing on several factors such as gender and academic qualification in ascertain whether there are differences in instructional leadership implemented by the heads of panel against the commitment of the teacher. Further, the study will look into functions of instructional leaderships in terms of drafting and clarifying the objectives, supervise, coordinate and evaluate the teaching of curriculum, support and encouraging staff development by the panels head and its relationship with teachers' commitment. The data of this study is collected through questionnaires on 140 teachers. For this purpose, the questionnaire, based on "Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale (PIMRS), is used to determine the level of instructional leadership of the panel heads. On teachers' commitment, "Commitment to School (CSS) and Organisational Commitment Questionnaires (OCQ)" based-typed questionnaire is being used. Questionnaires on instructional leadership and teachers' commitment consists of 31 and 28 question items respectively, are using Likert Scale format. T-test is used to find difference between gender and academic qualification and instructional leadership of the panel heads. Pearson R test is used to test the correlation between the functions of instructional leadership and the commitment if the teachers. In brief, we found that there are no significant differences between the gender and academic qualification of the respondents towards the commitments of the teachers and the instructional leadership of the panel heads. However, there are significant relationship between instructional leadership head of panels with the teachers' commitment
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Noazli, Abu Bakar
author_facet	Noazli, Abu Bakar
author_sort	Noazli, Abu Bakar
title	Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua panitia dan komitmen guru di sekolah rendah
title_short	Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua panitia dan komitmen guru di sekolah rendah
title_full	Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua panitia dan komitmen guru di sekolah rendah
title_fullStr	Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua panitia dan komitmen guru di sekolah rendah
title_full_unstemmed	Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua panitia dan komitmen guru di sekolah rendah
title_sort	hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua panitia dan komitmen guru di sekolah rendah
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate	2009
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/4802/1/s86963.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4802/2/s86963_abstract.pdf
_version_	1776103656727248896
spelling	my-uum-etd.48022023-02-08T00:30:23Z Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua panitia dan komitmen guru di sekolah rendah 2009 Noazli, Abu Bakar Md. Ali, Ruzlan College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB2801-3095 School administration and organization This study is conducted to find the relationship between instructional leadership of the subject panel heads and the teachers' commitment in the primary school in Tambun Tulang Area. The study is focusing on several factors such as gender and academic qualification in ascertain whether there are differences in instructional leadership implemented by the heads of panel against the commitment of the teacher. Further, the study will look into functions of instructional leaderships in terms of drafting and clarifying the objectives, supervise, coordinate and evaluate the teaching of curriculum, support and encouraging staff development by the panels head and its relationship with teachers' commitment. The data of this study is collected through questionnaires on 140 teachers. For this purpose, the questionnaire, based on "Principal Instructional Management Rating Scale (PIMRS), is used to determine the level of instructional leadership of the panel heads. On teachers' commitment, "Commitment to School (CSS) and Organisational Commitment Questionnaires (OCQ)" based-typed questionnaire is being used. Questionnaires on instructional leadership and teachers' commitment consists of 31 and 28 question items respectively, are using Likert Scale format. T-test is used to find difference between gender and academic qualification and instructional leadership of the panel heads. Pearson R test is used to test the correlation between the functions of instructional leadership and the commitment if the teachers. In brief, we found that there are no significant differences between the gender and academic qualification of the respondents towards the commitments of the teachers and the instructional leadership of the panel heads. However, there are significant relationship between instructional leadership head of panels with the teachers' commitment 2009 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4802/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4802/1/s86963.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4802/2/s86963_abstract.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000803818 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdullah Hj. Ahmad Badawi. (2004, Januari 9). Teks ucapan majlis perdana perkhidmatan awam ke-5. INTAN, 12. Abdullah Ismail. (2001). Persepsi guru terhadap kepemimpinan pengajaran pengetua-pengetua sekolah menengah daerah Temerloh dan Bera. Disertasi Sarjana Sains: Universiti Pertanian Malaysia. Andi Audryanah Md Nor. (2007). Kepemimpinan pengajaran dan efikasi kendiri pengetua sekolah menengah dan hubungannya dengan pencapaian akademik sekolah. Disertasi Sarjana Pendidikan: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Baharudin Ahmad. (2004). Gaya kepimpinan pemimpin dan komitmen pekerja di Jabatan Agama Islam, Selangor. Disertasi sarjana: Universiti Utara Malaysia. Bass, B. M. (1985). From transactional to transformational leadership: Learning to share the vision. New York: Organizational Dynamic. Basset, G. W., Crème, A. R. & Walker, W. G. (1974). Headmaster for better school. St. Lucia: University Queensland Press. Bennet, N. (1995). Managing profesional teachers: Middle management in primary and secondary schools. London: Pul Chapman Publishing Ltd. Bossert, S. T., Dwyer, D. C., Rowen, B., & Lee, G. V. (1982). The instructional management role of the principal. Educational Administration Quarterly, 18(3), 35-64. Dean, J. (1985). Managing the secondary school. London & Synder: Croom Helm. DeBevoise, W. (1984). Synthesis of research on the principal as instructional leader. Education Leadership. Dessler, G. (2007). Human resource management. New York: Prentice-Hall. Duke, D. L. (1987). School leadership and instructional improvemen. New York: Random House. Dunnette, M. D., & Kirchner, W. (1965). Psychology applied to industries. New York: Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall. Enuemel, C,P., & Egwunyenga, J. E. (2008). Principals' instructional leadership roles and effect on teachers' job performance: A case study of secondary schools in Asaba Metropolis, Delta State, Nigeria. Social Science Research, 16(1), 13-17. Findley, B. & Findley, D. (1992). Effective schools: The role of the principal. Contemporary Education, 63(2), 102-104. Gardner, J. W. (1990). On leadership. New York: Free Press. Ghemawat, P. (1991). Framework for analysing commitments. Leadership in Administrtion. Ghiselli, E. E., Haire, M., & Porter L.W. (1966). Managerial thinking: An international study. New York: Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Glasman, N. S. (1986). Evaluation-based leadership: School administration in contemporary perspective. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press. Greenfield, W. (1987). Instructional leadership: Concepts, issues and controversies. Newton, MA: Allyn & Bacon, Inc. Hallinger, P. (1987). Resource manual: The principal instructional management rating scale. Nashville: Vandebilt International Institute for Principals. Hallinger, P. (1992). The elvolving role of American principals: From managerial to instructional and transformational leaders. Journal of Educational Administration, 30(3), 35-48. Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. (1987). Assessing and developing principal intructional leadership. Education Leadership, 45(1), 54-62. Hallinger, P., & Taraseina, P. (2001). The principal's role as instructional leader: A review of studies using the principal instructional management rating scale. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle. House, R. J. (1971). A Path-Goal Theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321-339. Hussien Mahmood. (1993). Kepimpinan dan keberkesanan sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Tran Herman, (1995). Tingkahlaku lepak di kalangan remaja luar bandar. Bangi: Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia: True Times. Jamentz, K. (2002). Isolation is the enemy of improvement: Instructional leadership to support standards-based practic (pp. 138). San Francisco: WestEd. Jefri Hamid. (2004). Kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua/guru-besar dan kepuasan guru. Disertasi Sarjana Pendidikan: Universiti TeknoIogi Malaysia. Johnson, B., & Christensen, L. (2004). Quantitative, qualitative and mixed approaches. (2nd ed.). Educational Research: Pearson Education. Kamus Dewan. (2005). Edisi Baru. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Kanter, R. M. (1994). Leadership without easy answer. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia. (2001). Kepemimpinan dan pengurusan kurikulum di sekolah: Pusat Perkembangan Kurikulum Krejcie, R.V., & Morgan, D.W. (1970). Determining size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30, 607-610. Leithwood, K. A., & Montgomery, D. J. (1986). Improving principal eflectiveness: The principal profile. Toronto: OISE Press. Likert, R. (1967). The human organization: Its management and value. Retrieved from http://www.bookrags.com/biography/rensis-likert- soc. Mohamad Mazni Nasarudin. (1998). Peranan panitia mata pelajaran sejarah dari rakan sekerja. Disertasi Sarjana Pendidikan: Universiti Utara Malaysia. Mohd Majid Konting. (2000). Kaedah penyelidikan pendidikan. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dm Pustaka. Mohd. Najib Abdul Ghafar. (2001). Penyelidikan pendidikan. Skudai: Fakulti Pendidikan, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Mohd Nor Jaafar. (2004). Kepemimpinan pengajaran guru besar, komitmen dan kepuasan kerja guru: Satu kajian perbandingan dan hubungan antara sekolah berkesan dengan sekolah kurang berkesan. Tesis Ph.D.: Universiti Sains Malaysia. Mohd Roodzi Aziz. (1997). Komitmen terhadap organisasi di kalangan guru sekolah rendah bandar dan luar bandar. Disertasi Sarjana: Universiti Utara Malaysia. Mohd. Rosli Mohd Othman. (2000). Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional dengan iklim sekolah. Disertasi Sarjana: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Mohd. Shaffie Ahmad. (1995). Metodologi penyelidikan untuk bidang ekonomi dan bidang-bidang berkaitan. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. Mottaz, C. (1985). The relative importance of intrinsic and extrinsic rewards as determinants of work satisfaction. The Sociological Quarterly, 26, 365-385. Munira Mohsin. (2000). Persepsi guru terhadap amalan konsep kepimpinan pengajaran di kalangan pentadbir ke arah sekolah berkesan. Disertasi Sarjana Pendidikan: Universiti Putra Malaysia. Murphy, J. A., & Hallinger, P. (1985). Effective high schools-What are the common characteristics?. NASSP Bulletin. Nasirah Muin. (2000). Kepemimpinan pengajaran ke arah kecemerlangan pencapaian akademik di sekolah menengah daerah Gombak, Selangor. Disertasi Sarjana Pendidikan: Universiti Malaya. Noor Rezan Bapoo Hashim. (2006, Disember 2). Teks ucapan majlis penutupan rasmi konvensyen kebangsaan guru dalam ICT. KPM, 13-14. Obi, E. (2002). Motivation and organisational behaviour, (pp. 18-25) in A. N. Ndu, L. O.Ocho and B. S. Okeke (eds.), Dynamics of Educational Administration and Management: The Nigerian Perspectiv. Onitsha: Meks Publishers Ltd. Ogbodo, C. M., & Ekpo, A. I. (2005). Principals 'Managerial effectiveness and teachers' work performance in Akwa-Ibom State secondary schools. Journal of Educational Research and Development, 4(1), 62-73. Oliver, M. (2006). Mark's motivational mansion (tm) and self leadership. Australian Psychological Type Review, 8(2), 9-14. Patimah Ibrahim. (2002). Budaya kualiti sekolah dan hubungannya dengan komitmen guru. Disertasi Sarjana Pendidikan: Universiti Utara Malaysia. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Choosing qualitative research: A primer for technology education researchers. Journal of Technology Education, 9. Pelan Induk Pembangunan Pendidikan 2006-2010.(2006). Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia: Edisi Pelancaran Peter Songan, & Rijeng Jishet. (2000). Instructional leadership roler of secondary school in Sarawak. Jurnal Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malqysia, 6, 22-34. Porter, L. W., & Steer, R. M. (1973). Organizational, work and personal factors in employee turnover and absenteeism. Psychological Bulletin, 80. Rohana Salam.(2002). Peranan pengetua sebagai pemimpin pengajaran: kajian di sekolah di daerah Pontian, Johor. Disertasi Sarjana Kepengetuaan: Universiti Malaya. Sachs, P. (1995). Transforming work: Collaboration, learning, and design. Communications of the ACM, 38(9), 36-44. Sakaran, Uma (1992). Research methods for business. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Samsor Sahdan. (2003). Kepimpinan pengajaran dan pelaksanaan inovasi kurikulum di sekolah menengah daerah Kota Setar, Kedah. Disertasi Sarjana Pendidikan: Universiti Utara Malaysia. Sazali Yusof, Zurida Ismail, & Mustapa Kassim. (2004). Pengaruh efikasi-kendiri guru besar terhadap sekolah berkesan. Jurnal Pengurusan Pendidikan, IAB: KPM, 14(1), 34-44. Shafari Mohamed Nor. (2001). Kajian amalan kepemimpinan pengajaran pengetua dari persepsi pengetua dan guru sekolah menengah di Kuala Pilah. Disertasi Sarjana Sains: Universiti Putra Malaysia. Shahrom Sukari. (1999). Persepsi guru-guru terhadap kepimpinan pengajaran pengetua sepatut dan sebenar di sebuah sekolah menengah daerah Kulai. Disertasi Sarjana: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Short, P. M., & Spencer, W. A. (1990). Principal instructional leadership. Journal of Research and Development in Education. Sergiovanni, T.J. (1996). The theoritical basis for cultural leardership: Examining the elusive. ASCD Yearbook. Alexandria, VA: ASCD Publications. Shaw, J., & Reyes, P. (1992).School culture: Organizational value orientation and commitment. Journal of Educational Research, 85, 5. Sufa'at Tumin. (2005). Kursus kepimpinan instruksional pengetua sekolah-sekolah negeri Johor: Jabatan Pelajaran Johor. Supovitz, J. A., & Susan, M. P. (2001). Instructional leadership in a standards-based reform (pp. 28). Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: Consortium for Policy Research in Education. Tyree, K., & Alexender, J. (1996). Conceptualizing and measuring commitment to high school teaching. Journal of Educational Research, 89, 5. Wellisch, J. B. (1978). School management and organization in successful schools. Sociology Of Education, 51, 211-216. Wong Huey Ling. (2007). Tahap penglibatan pelajar di sekolah menengah dalam aktiviti kokurikulum dan hubungannya dengan pembentukan daya kepimpinan. Disertasi Sarjana Pendidikan: Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Yukl, G. (1994). Leadership In Organizations (3rd ed). NJ: Prentice-Hall Inc. Zulkifli Abdullah. (1997). Hubungan latar belakang, komitmen guru dan pelajar dengan kecemerlangan akademik. Disertasi Sarjana: Universiti Utara Malaysia.

Hubungan kepimpinan instruksional ketua panitia dan komitmen guru di sekolah rendah

Similar Items