Gaya kepimpinan pengetua. Apa kata guru sekolah?

The aim of this research is to examine effective school management by looking at the best leadership style applied in school, the personal factors need for h s leadershipstyle, has effect of the leadership style on school management and teachers?.The study was carried out using qualitative approa...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Huang, Huat Leong
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2009
Subjects:	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/4827/1/s802728.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4827/2/s802728_abstract.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.4827
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Shaik Abdullah, Sarimah
topic	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization
spellingShingle	LB2801-3095 School administration and organization Huang, Huat Leong Gaya kepimpinan pengetua. Apa kata guru sekolah?
description	The aim of this research is to examine effective school management by looking at the best leadership style applied in school, the personal factors need for h s leadershipstyle, has effect of the leadership style on school management and teachers?.The study was carried out using qualitative approach a semi-structure interview approach of purposive sampling. Seven respondents from a school in rural participated of Sarawak. Data was collected by interviews a respondent until its saturated (Robson, 2002). The data were analysed by using transcriptions, reduction, coding and report process (Miles and Huberman, 1994). Results show that democratics leadership style was the most approriate style to apply in school. Democratic leadership includes positive personality, motivate teachers and highly skilled to carry out. The democratics leadership style brings about efficiency in management and positive cultures. Also democratic leadership style guarantees teachers welfare, increased motivation and effective communication
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Huang, Huat Leong
author_facet	Huang, Huat Leong
author_sort	Huang, Huat Leong
title	Gaya kepimpinan pengetua. Apa kata guru sekolah?
title_short	Gaya kepimpinan pengetua. Apa kata guru sekolah?
title_full	Gaya kepimpinan pengetua. Apa kata guru sekolah?
title_fullStr	Gaya kepimpinan pengetua. Apa kata guru sekolah?
title_full_unstemmed	Gaya kepimpinan pengetua. Apa kata guru sekolah?
title_sort	gaya kepimpinan pengetua. apa kata guru sekolah?
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	College of Arts and Sciences (CAS)
publishDate	2009
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/4827/1/s802728.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4827/2/s802728_abstract.pdf
_version_	1747827810069643264
spelling	my-uum-etd.48272015-08-06T02:32:08Z Gaya kepimpinan pengetua. Apa kata guru sekolah? 2009 Huang, Huat Leong Shaik Abdullah, Sarimah College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB2801-3095 School administration and organization The aim of this research is to examine effective school management by looking at the best leadership style applied in school, the personal factors need for h s leadershipstyle, has effect of the leadership style on school management and teachers?.The study was carried out using qualitative approach a semi-structure interview approach of purposive sampling. Seven respondents from a school in rural participated of Sarawak. Data was collected by interviews a respondent until its saturated (Robson, 2002). The data were analysed by using transcriptions, reduction, coding and report process (Miles and Huberman, 1994). Results show that democratics leadership style was the most approriate style to apply in school. Democratic leadership includes positive personality, motivate teachers and highly skilled to carry out. The democratics leadership style brings about efficiency in management and positive cultures. Also democratic leadership style guarantees teachers welfare, increased motivation and effective communication 2009 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4827/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4827/1/s802728.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4827/2/s802728_abstract.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Abas Awang (1999). Leadership and education change. Kertas Persidangan Pengurusan Kepimpinan Pendidikan Cemerlang Aspirasi Negara. Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Abdul Shukor Abdullah (1995). Membina Sekolah Berkesan: Aplikasi dasar. Seminar Sekolah efektif: Anjuran Kementerian pendidikan pada 13-14 Julai 1995. Institut Aminuddin Baki. A1 Ramaiah (1999). Kepimpinan Pendidikan: Cabaran masa kini. Peta1ing Jaya: IBS Buku Sdn Bhd. Apple, M. W. & Beane, J. A. (1995). Democratic Schools. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA. Atan Long, Ishak Rejab, Abdul Aziz Sultan, Mohd Nor Long, Mohd Sahari Nordin, Nik Ahmad Hisham Ismail, Ratnawati Ashraf & Rosnani Hashim (1991). Faktor-faktor yang menyumbang kepada peningkatan kemajuan sekolah-sekolah: Kajian kes. Kertas kerja seminar latihan mengajar antara universiti kali ke-7. Kuala Lumpur, Universiti Islam Antarabangsa Malaysia. Baharom Mohamad (2004). Persepsi guru-guru terhadap kepimpinan pengajaran dalam celik komputer di sekolah-sekolah Negeri Johor. Tesis Unversiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Bangi. Bass B.M, & Avalio, B.J. (1990). Developing the transformational leadership: 1992 and beyond. Journal of European Industrial Training, 14, 21-27. Bass, B.M (1990). Handbook of leadership: Theory, research and managerial application. Ed. Ke-3. New York: The Free Press. Charles, Gary dan David J (2000). Portrait of the "Ideal Principal": Context and Self. NASSP Bulletin v84 n6 17 p. 5-14. Cheah Lee Hwa (2008). The Impact of Principal's Transformational Democratic Leadershp Style on Teachers 'Job Satisfaction and Commitment. Tesis UUM. Day C. (2005). Sustaining Success in Challenging Contexts: Leadership in English Schools. Journal of Educational Administration, 43 (6), pp 573-583. Dwey, J. (1916). Democracy in education. Macmillan, New York, NY. Dinham, S. & Scott, C. (1996). The Teacher 2000 Project: A Study of Teacher Satisfaction, Motivation and Health. Kingswood: University of Western Sydney, Nepean, Faculty of Education. Dinham, S. & Scott, C. (2000). 'Moving into the third, Outer Domain of Teacher Satisfaction'. Journal of Educational Administration, 38(4):379-396. Dunford J, Fawcett R. & Bennett D. (2000). School Leadership. London: Kogan page. Dvir, T., Eden, D., Avolio, B.J., & Shamir, B. (2002). The Impact of Transformational Leadership on Follower Development & Performance: A field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 735-744. Eagly, A.H., Johannsen, S., Mary C., Van, Engen, Marlves, L. (2003). Psychological Bulletin, 129(4), 569-591. Elmore RF (2006). Leadership as the practice of improvement. Paper presented at the International Conference on Perspectives on Leadership for Systemic improvement, London UK. Fullan, M. (1991), The New Meaning of Educational Change, Cassell, London. Furman, G & Shields, C. (2003). "How can leaders promote and support social justice and democratic community in schools?", paper presented at AERA, chicago, IL. Gaertner, S. (2000). Structural Determinants of Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment in Turnover Models', Human Resource Management Review 9(4): 479-493. Giroux, H. (2002), "Democracy, freedom and justice after September 11th: rethinking the role of educators and the politics of schooling", Teachers College Record, 104(6), 1138-62. Green, J. (1999). Deep Democracy: Community, Diversity and Transformation. Rowman and Littlefield, Lanham, MD. Gross, S.J., Shaw, K. and Shapiro, J.P. (2003), "Deconstructing accountability through the lens of democratic philosophies: toward a new analytic framework. The Journal of Research for Educational Leadership, 1(3), 5-27. Haji Md. Hashim, Hajah Nor Aida (2002). Stail kepimpinan pengetua dan kepuasan kerja guru di sekolah menengah gred B di Daerah Kota Setar. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Hallinger, P. & Murphy, J. (1985). Assessing the instructional management behavior of principals. The Elementary School Journal 86(2): 217-247. Hammersley, M. (1999). Deconstructing the qualitative-quantitative divide. In A. Bryman & RG. Burgess, (Eds). Qualitative research, Vol 1, 70-83. London: Sage Publications. Herzberg, F. (1959), The Motivation to Work, John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY. Hussein Mahmood (1993). Kepemimpinan dan Keberkesanan Sekolah. Kuala Lumpur: Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. Hoog J., Johansson 0. dan Olofsson A (2005). Successful principalship- The Swedish Case. Journal of Educational Administration, 43(6), pp 595-606. Ibrahim Mamat (2001). Pengetua sekolah menangani isu dun cabaran kepimpinan. Ed.2. Subang Jaya: Kumpulan Budiman Sdn. Bhd. Ishak Sin (2001). Pengaruh kepimpinan pengajaran, kepimpinan transformasional dan gantian kepada kepimpinan ke atas komitmen terhadap organisasi, efikasi dan kepuasan kerja guru. Tesis Doktor Falsafah. University Kebangsaan Malaysia. Ishak Sin (2004). Apakah Yang Tertulis dalam Khazanah Tulisan Ilmiah tentang Tret, Tingkah-Laku dan Tindakan Diperlukan Untuk Menjadikan Seseorang Pengetua Yang Berkesan. Seminar Pegurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan Ke-12. Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur. Iverson, R.D. (2000). An Event History Analysis of Employee Turnover: The Case of Hospital Employees in Australia; Human Resource Management Review 9(4): 397-418. Johansson, 0. (2000), "Om rektors demokratiskt rejleklerande ledarskap", in Lundberg, L. (Ed.), Go" randets lov - Lova att go" ra, Skrifter fra°n Centrum fo"r skolledarutveckling 2000: 1, Umea° universitet. Latip bin Muhammad (2007). Pelaksanaan Kepimpinan Pengajaran di Kalangan Pengetua Sekolah. Seminar Penyelidikan Pendidikan Institut Perguruan Batu Lintang. Lashway dan Lany (2002). The Accountability Challenge. Principal, v81 n3 p14-16. Leithwood, K. (2005). Understanding Successful Principal Leadership: Progress On a Broken Front. Journal of Educational Administration: 2005; 43, 6; ABI/INFORM Global. Leithwood, K. and Reihl, C. (2005). "What we know about successful school leadership", in Firestone, W. And Reihl, C. (Eds). A New Agenda: directions for Research on Educational Leadership, Teachers College Press, New York, NY, 22-47. Lejf, M. & Klaus, K, K. (2009). Sustained Successfull School Leadership in Denmark. Journal of Educational Administration, 47(6), 709-718. Lincoln Y.S & Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hils, CA: Sage. Locke, E.A, Kirkpatrick S, Wheeler, J.K Schneider, J. Niles, K. Goldstein, H. Welsh, K. & Chan, D. (1991). The essence of leadership: the four keys to leading succesfully. New York: Laxington Books. Lynch, B.K.(1996). Language program evaluation: Theory and practice, New York: Cambridge University Press. Mac Murray J (1961). Persons in relation. London: Faber. Madsyim (2009). Bincangkan Gaya Kepimpinan Pengetua pada 5 Disember 2009 dalam http://tuanmat.tripod.com/ gayapimpinan.html. Maimunah bt. Muda (2004). Kepimpinan Situasi di Kalangan Pengetua Sekolah di Malaysia. Seminar Nasional Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan ke-12, Institut Aminuddin Baki, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Marshall, C. & Rossman, G.B. (1999). Designing Qualitative research. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications. Mary Ann dan Marian (2001). Surviving the Principalship. Principal v80 n4 p38-39. Md. Kher b. Khamis (2002). Kecemerlangan akademik murid: Satu kajian tentang korelasi gaya kepimpinan, gelagat, kepengurusan guru besar dan iltizam guru. Tesis UUM. Mohd. Anuar Abd Rahman, P. Madya. Dr. Azizi Hj. Yahaya, Mohamaed Yusope Hassan, (2004). Gaya pemudahcara perubahan di sekolah: Sejauhmanakah pengetua-pengetua mengamalkannya. Seminar Nasional Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan ke-12. Institut Aminuddin Baki, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Mohd. Nor. B. Jaafar (2004). Kepimpinan Pengajaran Guru Besar, Komitmen dan Kepuasan Kerja Guru: Satu kajian perbandingan dan hubungan antara sekolah berkesan dengan sekolah kurang berkesan. Seminar Nasional Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikun ke-12, Institut Aminuddin Baki, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Mohd. Yajid B. Yusoff (2000). Persepsi guru-guru terhadap gaya kepimpinan pengetua di sekolah-sekolah yayasan Islam Kelantan. Tesis UUM. Miles, H.B. & Huberman. A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Newbury Park, CA, USA: Sage Publications Inc. Miles, M.B & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis. An expanded sourcebook. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks. Califf:sage. Mortimore P. (1995). Key Characteristics of Eflective Schools. Seminar Sekolah Efektif. Anjuran Kementerian Pendidikan pada 13-14 Julai 1995. Institut Amninuddin baki. M. Puvenesvary, Radziah, A.R., R.Sivabala, Mastura B., Noor Fadhilah, Noor Hashima, (2008). Qualitative research: Data Collection & Data analysis techniques. UUM. Norhannan Ramli dan Jamaliah Abdul Hamid (2006). Gaya Kepimpinan Pengetua Wanita dan Hubungannya dengan Tahap Motivasi Guru Sekolah Menengah. Jurnal Pendidikan UKM, 31, 53-69. Paul T. Begley dan Lindy Zaretslq (2004). Democratic school leadership in Canada's public school systems:professional value and social ethic. Journal of Educational Administration, 640-655. Patton, M.Q. (1987). How to use qualitative mehods in evaluation. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications Inc. Peter, E. & Dick, W. (2004). Understanding School Leadership. SAGE publications Company. Robson, C. (2002). Real world research (2nd ed). Oxford Blackwell. Schultz, 1.L & Teddlie, C. (1999). "The relationship between teachers' job satisfaction and their perceptions of principals' use of power and school effectiveness". Education 19(4): 461-468. Sergiovanni T.J (1995). The Principalship: a reflective practive perspective. Boston: Allyn and Bacon. Sharil @ Charil Marzuki (2000). Ciri-ciri kepimpinan pengetua dan guru berkesan yang dapat menghadapi cabaran dan harapan pada abad ke 21. Kertas kerja Seminar Nasional Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan ke-9. Institut Aminuddin Baki, Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia, 1-3 Ogos. Starratt, R. J. (2004), Ethical Leadership, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA. Steward, C.J., & Cash, Jr. W.B. (2003). Intewiewing:Princrples and practices. Boston: McGraw Hill. Tirozzi dan Gerald N (2001). The Artistry of Leadership: The Evolving Role of the Secondary School Principal. Phi Delta Kappan, v82 n6 p434-439. Tn. Hj. Ismail Mustafa (2008). Kepimpinan dalam Pendidikan. Honey Publication. Todd, W. & Elizabeth, T. (2001). What Is Your Priority? NASSP BULLETIN v84 n617 p16-21. Weinberg, D. (2002). Qualitative research methods. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers Inc. Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing. London: Sage Publication. Y.F, Chan, (2004). Kepimpinan Transformasional dan Inovasi Pendidikan. Seminar Nasional Pengurusan dan Kepimpinan Pendidikan ke-12. Institut Aminuddin Baki, Kementerian Pelajaran Malaysia. Yin, R K. (1994) Case study research: Design & methods. Beverly Hills, California: Sage Publications. Yu, H., Leithwood, K., & Jantzi, D. (2002). The effect of transforrnasional leadership on teachers' commitment to change in Hong Kong. Journal of Educational Administration, 40(4), 368-389. Yukl, G. (1998), Leadership in Organizations, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.

Gaya kepimpinan pengetua. Apa kata guru sekolah?

Similar Items