Sikap dan penglibatan Penolong Pegawai Perubatan pelatih dalam aktiviti kokurikulum dengan pencapaian akademik
The purpose of this study was to identify differences in attitude and participation in cocurricular activities based on gender among the Assistant Medical Officer Trainee and this study is to identify the relationship of attitude and participation in co-curricular activities and academic achieveme...
Saved in:
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Thesis |
Language: | eng eng |
Published: |
2010
|
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://etd.uum.edu.my/4885/1/s800510.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4885/2/s800510_abstract.pdf |
Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
|
id |
my-uum-etd.4885 |
---|---|
record_format |
uketd_dc |
institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
collection |
UUM ETD |
language |
eng eng |
advisor |
Veloo, Arsaythamby |
topic |
LB1050.9-1091 Educational psychology |
spellingShingle |
LB1050.9-1091 Educational psychology Mat Shater, Awang Sikap dan penglibatan Penolong Pegawai Perubatan pelatih dalam aktiviti kokurikulum dengan pencapaian akademik |
description |
The purpose of this study was to identify differences in attitude and participation in cocurricular activities based on gender among the Assistant Medical Officer Trainee and
this study is to identify the relationship of attitude and participation in co-curricular
activities and academic achievement among Assistant Medical Officer Trainee at Alor Setar Medical Assistant College. In this study, a total of 142 persons from 625 college students in Alor Setar Medical Assistant College had been chosen as respondents. Information obtained in this study were processed and analyzed by computer using the program Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) which includes t-test, One-Way ANOVA, and Pearson correlations. T-test used for detecting whether there is a difference in attitude and participation of student co-curricular activities on gender; One-Way ANOVA analysis used to detect differences between gender and attitudes, the number of co-curricular activities with the attitude, the attitude and academic performance of duties additional attitude. Pearson correlation analysis used to determine the relationship between the number of co-curricular activities with additional tasks and duties in addition to participation. The study found no significant difference between the significant academic and co-curricular participation, there was no significant difference between academic achievement and student attitudes, there was no significant difference between attitude scores and gender and also no significant difference between participation and gender. The implication of this study to the Alor Setar Medical Assistant College is the step to improve the attitude of trainees should be explored. This is because that with the attitude of student participation in co-curricular activities. Among the trainees should be encouraged to participate themselves more in co-curricular activities. This is because there is no significant difference in terms of attitude and participation of the respondents actively participated in co-curricular activities. Instructor-trainers who act as Chief Coordinator Animated Work and co-curricular activities is proposed to create more additional positions in associations, clubs and sports. Increase the number of committees, clubs, associations and sports. This sense of responsibility at least improve self-esteem and motivation training in co-curricular activities and academics. Awards for excellence in the curriculum should be increased in line with the curriculum |
format |
Thesis |
qualification_name |
masters |
qualification_level |
Master's degree |
author |
Mat Shater, Awang |
author_facet |
Mat Shater, Awang |
author_sort |
Mat Shater, Awang |
title |
Sikap dan penglibatan Penolong Pegawai Perubatan pelatih dalam aktiviti kokurikulum dengan pencapaian akademik |
title_short |
Sikap dan penglibatan Penolong Pegawai Perubatan pelatih dalam aktiviti kokurikulum dengan pencapaian akademik |
title_full |
Sikap dan penglibatan Penolong Pegawai Perubatan pelatih dalam aktiviti kokurikulum dengan pencapaian akademik |
title_fullStr |
Sikap dan penglibatan Penolong Pegawai Perubatan pelatih dalam aktiviti kokurikulum dengan pencapaian akademik |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sikap dan penglibatan Penolong Pegawai Perubatan pelatih dalam aktiviti kokurikulum dengan pencapaian akademik |
title_sort |
sikap dan penglibatan penolong pegawai perubatan pelatih dalam aktiviti kokurikulum dengan pencapaian akademik |
granting_institution |
Universiti Utara Malaysia |
granting_department |
College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) |
publishDate |
2010 |
url |
https://etd.uum.edu.my/4885/1/s800510.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4885/2/s800510_abstract.pdf |
_version_ |
1747827820617269248 |
spelling |
my-uum-etd.48852015-08-26T06:01:04Z Sikap dan penglibatan Penolong Pegawai Perubatan pelatih dalam aktiviti kokurikulum dengan pencapaian akademik 2010 Mat Shater, Awang Veloo, Arsaythamby College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB1050.9-1091 Educational psychology The purpose of this study was to identify differences in attitude and participation in cocurricular activities based on gender among the Assistant Medical Officer Trainee and this study is to identify the relationship of attitude and participation in co-curricular activities and academic achievement among Assistant Medical Officer Trainee at Alor Setar Medical Assistant College. In this study, a total of 142 persons from 625 college students in Alor Setar Medical Assistant College had been chosen as respondents. Information obtained in this study were processed and analyzed by computer using the program Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) which includes t-test, One-Way ANOVA, and Pearson correlations. T-test used for detecting whether there is a difference in attitude and participation of student co-curricular activities on gender; One-Way ANOVA analysis used to detect differences between gender and attitudes, the number of co-curricular activities with the attitude, the attitude and academic performance of duties additional attitude. Pearson correlation analysis used to determine the relationship between the number of co-curricular activities with additional tasks and duties in addition to participation. The study found no significant difference between the significant academic and co-curricular participation, there was no significant difference between academic achievement and student attitudes, there was no significant difference between attitude scores and gender and also no significant difference between participation and gender. The implication of this study to the Alor Setar Medical Assistant College is the step to improve the attitude of trainees should be explored. This is because that with the attitude of student participation in co-curricular activities. Among the trainees should be encouraged to participate themselves more in co-curricular activities. This is because there is no significant difference in terms of attitude and participation of the respondents actively participated in co-curricular activities. Instructor-trainers who act as Chief Coordinator Animated Work and co-curricular activities is proposed to create more additional positions in associations, clubs and sports. Increase the number of committees, clubs, associations and sports. This sense of responsibility at least improve self-esteem and motivation training in co-curricular activities and academics. Awards for excellence in the curriculum should be increased in line with the curriculum 2010 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4885/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4885/1/s800510.pdf text eng validuser https://etd.uum.edu.my/4885/2/s800510_abstract.pdf text eng public http://lintas.uum.edu.my:8080/elmu/index.jsp?module=webopac-l&action=fullDisplayRetriever.jsp&szMaterialNo=0000802661 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Ab Alim Abdul Rahim. (1999). Penglibatan pelajar secara aktif dalam kegiatan kokurikulum dan kesan ke atas pencapaian akademik satu tinjauan di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Pekan Nanas, Pontian Johor. (Universiti Teknologi Malaysia). Abd. Sukor Shaari, Yahya Don dan Yaakob Daud. (2004). Motivasi belajar dan harga diri: Hubungan dengan pencapaian akademik dan kegiatan kokurikulum pelajar sekolah menengah. Fakulti Sains dan Kognitif, Universiti Utara Malaysia. Abdul Rashid Mohamed dan Mohamad Daud Hamzah. (2005). Kajian Korelasi Emosi Malu Dengan Pencapaian Akademik Di Kalangan Mahasiswa Melayu. Universiti Sains Malaysia. Adnan. (1990). Faktor-faktor yang menghalang penglibatan pelajar dalam Kegiatan kokurikulum sukan di kalangan pelajar Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Daerah Seremban. Jabatan Pendidikan Jasmani Dan Kesihatan Maktab Perguruan Islam. Abu Bakar. (1999).Faktor-faktor yang menghalang penglibatan pelajar dalam Kegiatan kokurikulum sukan di kalangan pelajar Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Daerah Seremban. Ahmad Badawi. (1984). Faktor-faktor yang menghalang penglibatan pelajar dalam Kegiatan kokurikulum sukan di kalangan pelajar Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Daerah Seremban. Ahmad Saufie Haji Ali. Hubungan Antara Orientasi Pembelajaran, Motivasi Pencapaian Dan Pendekatan Pembelajaran Serta Kesannya Terhadap Pencapaian Pelajar Dalam Mata Pelajaran Ekonomi Tingkatan Enam. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. (1996) ; Tesis. Alim Abu Rahim. (1997). "Pengurusan Kokurikulum." Shah Alam; Penerbit Fajar Bakti Sdn. Bhd. Ames. (1990). Motivasi belajar dun harga diri; Hubungan dengan pencapaian akademik dan kegiatan kokurikulum pelajar sekolah menengah. Amina Noor. (1999). Kejayaan Ditangan Pelajar; Teknik Lulus Peperiksaan dengan Cemerlang. Kuala Lumpur, Jasmin Enterprise. Ary, D, Jacacobs, L. C & Razavieh, A. (2000). Introduction to research in education. (4th ed). Forthworth, Texas; Holt, Rinehart, Winston. Xiv, 536 pp. Azizah Nordin. (1991). Penglibatan pelajar secara aktif dalam kegiatan kokurikulum dan kesan ke atas pencapaian akademik satu tinjauan di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Pekun Nanas, Pontian Johor. Beau, F. A. (1982). The mental ability of athletes in comparison with non-athletes in high school. American School Board Journal, 73(2), 45-155. Boothby. (1981). Faktor-faktor yang menghalang penglibatan pelajar dalam Kegiatan kokurikulum sukan di kalangan pelajar Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Daerah Seremban. Broophy, J. (1996). Synthesis of research on strategies for motivating students to learn. Educational Leadership, 87, 40-48. Chambers. B, & Abrami, C. P. (1991). The Relationship Between Student Team Learning Outcome and Achievement, Causal Attributions and Affect. Educational Psychology. 83; 140-146. Che Mah Yusof dan Mariani Mohd Nor. (2001). Personaliti pelajar pintar dan hubungannya dengan pencapaian akademik. Prosiding konferensi kebangsaan Kajian Pasca Siswazah (Greduc). Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Malaya, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur. Coleman, J. S. (1983). The Adolescent Society. New York; Free Press of Glencoa. Collinson, E. (2000). A Survey of Elementary Students' Learning Style Preferences and Academic Success. Contemporary Education. 71(4), 42-48. Colquitt, Lepine dan Noe. (2000). Motivasi belajar dan harga diri: Hubungan dengan pencapaian akudemik dan kegiatan kokurikulum pelajar sekolah menengah. Covington, M.V. (2000). Goal theory, motivation and school achievement: An integrative review. Annual Review of Psychology 51; 171-200. Faktor-faktor yang menghalang penglibatan pelajar dalam Kegiatan kokurikulum sukan di kalangan pelajar Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Daerah Seremban. Crawford, D. & Godbey, G. (1987). Reconceptualizing barriers to family recreation. Leisure Sciences, 9(3), 119-127. Crow dan Crow. (1993). Psikologi Pendidikan Untuk Guru. Kuala Lumpur; Dewan Bahasa dan Pustaka. D'Amico. A. & Cardaci M. (2003). Relations among perceived self-efficacy, self-esteem and school achievement. Psychological Report, 92, 3. (Faktor-faktor yang menghalang penglibatan pelajar dalam Kegiatan kokurikulum sukan di kalangan pelajar Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Daerah Seremban. Doljanac, R. F. 1994. Using motivational factors and learning strategies to predict academic success. Doctoral Dissertations, The University of Michigan, 1994. Dissertation Abstracts International 56. Dunn, R., & Dunn, K. (1978). Teaching Student Through Their Individual Learning Styles; The Centre for the Study of Learning and Teaching Styles. St. John's University. Jamaica, New York. Dunn, R and Dunn, K. (1999). The Complete Guide to The Learning Styles Inservice System. United States of America ; Allyn & Bacon. Dunn, R dan Steven, J. M. Teaching Diverse College Students to Study a Learning Style Prescription. College Students Journal. (1997) 31(3) 333-339. Dwyer, C. A. (1974). Influence of children 's sex role standards on reading and mathematics achievement, Journal Of Educational Psychology 66; 811-816. Eleanor Ann Tan Lye Neo. (1984). Kajian pencapaian akademik di kalangan para atlit dan bukan atlit di peringkat Sijil Rendah Pelajaran. Projek Khas Sarjana Muda yang Tidak Diterbitkan. Serdang; Universiti Putra Malaysia. Fatanah Mohamed. (1997). Perkaitan antara pencapaian akademik dengan faktor personaliti dan persekitaran keluarga di kalangan pelajar MRSM. Tesis Phd. Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bangi, Selangor. Faridah Karim. (1981). (Penglibatan pelajar secara aktif dalam kegiatan kokurikulum dan kesan ke atas pencapaian akademik satu tinjauan di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Pekan Nanas, Pontian Johor, Dalam Aminuddin bin Abdul Rahman, 2004). Faridah Abu Hassan, Naimah Ishak, Hamidah Yusof dan Habibah Abdul Rahim. (2002). Kemiskinan Dan Pendidikan: Perubahan Minda Orang Melayu Ke Arah Kecemerlangan Pendidikan Akademik, Jurnal Pendidikan m/s 58). Flavell, J. H., Friedrichs, A. G. & Hoyt, J. D. (1970). Developmental changes in memorization processes. Cognitive Psychology. Flavell, J. H. 1976. Metacognitive aspects of problem solving. In. Resnick, L. B. Eds. The nature of intelligence, 231-235. Hillsdale, New Jersey; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Fraenkel, J. R & Wallen N. E. (1990). How to design and evaluate research in education. McGraw Hill Publishing Company. New York. Garis Panduan Kokurikulum, Bahagian Pengurusan Latihan Kementerian Kesihatan Malaysia. (2007). Gremli, Jack. (1996). Tuned in to Learning Styles. Music Educators Journals. Vol 83, p 24. Grigerenko, E. L. & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). Thinking styles. In D. H. Saklofske, & M. Zeidner. (Eds.). International Handbook of Personality and Intelligence, 205-230. New York; Plenum Press. Griggs, S.A. (1991).Learning Styles Counseling. Ann Arbor, MI; ERIC Counseling and Personnel Services Clearing House. The University of Michigan. Harter, S. (1990). Causes, Correlates and functional role of self-worth: A life span perspective. In R. J Sternberg & J. Kolligian (Eds.), Competence Considered (pp. 67-69) New Haven, Ct; Yale University Press. Honey, P. & Murnford, A. (1992a). Using your Learning Styles. Maidenhead; Peter Honey. Janet B. Parks. (1990). Faktor-faktor yang menghalang penglibatan pelajar dalam Kegiatan kokurikulum sukan di kalangan pelajar Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Daerah Seremban Dalam Mohd Jaflus Bahari, 2004. Jules, V, & Kutnick, P. (1997). Studentperceptions of good teacher; The gender perspective. British Journal Of Educational Psychology 67; 497-511. Kantha Kumar Ramasamy. (1985). Kaedah permainan dalam proses pengajaran pembelajaran pendidikan jasmani. Jurnal Institut Pendidikan Darul Aman, 19, 8-13. Kementerian Pendidikan. (1989). Penglibatan pelajar secara aktif dalam kegiatan kokurikulum dan kesan ke atas pencapaian akadernik satu tinjauan di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Pekan Nanas, Pontian Johor. Khalid Mohamad Nor. (2002). Belajar Teknik Belajar Di Sekolah dan Di Universiti. Kuala Lurnpur ; PTS Publication And Distribution Sdn. Bhd. 2-5. Kolb D. A. (1984). Experiential Learning; Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Eaglewood Clifls. N. J; Prentice Hall. Lim Yen Yen. (1991). Faktor-faktor yang menghalang penglibatan pelajar dalam Kegiatan kokurikulum sukan di kalangan pelajar Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Daerah Seremban. Marshall (1987), Motivasi belajar dan harga diri: Hubungan dengan pencapaian akademik dan kegiatan kokurikulum pelajar sekolah menengah. Mckenna, E. (1997). Gender Differences In Reading Attitude. ERIC Document No: ED407653. Saemah Rahman dan John Arul Philips. (2006). Jurnal pendidikan Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia 31 (2006) 21-39. Hubungan antara metakognisi, motivasi dan pencapaian akademik pelajar universiti. McLoughlin, C. (1999). The implications of the research literature on learning styles for the design of instructional material. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 15 (3), 222-241. Md. Idris Mansor. (1985). Penglibatan pelajar secara aktif dalam kegiatan kokurikulum dan kesan ke atas pencapaian akademik satu tinjauan di Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Pekan Nanas, Pontian Johor. Meriwater, N. K. (2003). Can self-esteem sanction morality? Journal of Moral Education. 6, 32. Mohammed Darabie. (2000). The relationship between college-level Jordanian students' metacognitive awareness strategies and their reading comprehension achievement in English as a foreign language. Dissertation Abstracts International 61 (07A) ; 2646. Mohamed Nor. (1985). Motivasi belajar dan harga diri; Hubungan dengan pencapaian akademik dan kegiatan kokurikulum pelajar sekolah menengah. Mohd Lotpi. (1997). Faktor-faktor yang menghalang penglibatan pelajar dalam Kegiatan kokurikulum sukan di kalangan pelajar Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Daerah Seremban. Mohd. Najib Abdul Ghafar. (2007). "Intervensi Pembangunan Organisasi Pendidikan." Skudai; Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. Mohd Razali Abdullah. (1983). Perbandingan prestasi akademik atlit dan bukan atlit di Sekolah Menengah Sultan Mahmud, Kuala Terengganu. Journal Akademik. Maktab Perguruan Kuala Terengganu, Jilid IX, 39-47. Mohd Shahrani Ahmad & Zainal Madon. (2003). Tip pandai belajar: Panduan teknikteknik berkesan semasa belajar dan mengajar. PTS Publication & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Mohd Sofian, Arninuddin & Borhan. (2002). Faktor-faktor yang menghalang penglibatan pelajar dalam Kegiatan kokurikulum sukan di kalangan pelajar Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Daerah Seremban. Mohd Suzli. (1997). Faktor-faktor yang menghalang penglibatan pelajar dalam Kegiatan kokurikulum sukan di kalangan pelajar Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Daerah Seremban. Mohd Yusoff Man. (1983). Sejauhmana penglibatan murid-murid dalam gerakerja kokurikulum di sekolah memgengaruhi Nik Azis Nik Pa. (1999). Mitos dan realiti tentang pelajar pintar cerdas. Jurnal Kebajikan, 16(2), 87-112. Orpen, C. (1976). The relationship between personality traits, motives for teaching and teaching trainees attitudes toward teaching. Doctoral Thesis, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang. Pask, G. (1976). Conversational techniques in the study and practice of education. British Journal Educational Psychology. Harrnondsworth; Penguin Books. Perrin, J. The Learning Styles Project for Potential Dropout. Educational Leadership. 1990. 48, 2 ; 23-24. Pintrich, P. R & DeGroot, E.V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1); 33-40. Robbins, S. P. (1998). Organization behaviour; concepts, controversies and application. Eight ed. New Jersey; Prentice Hall International NC. Rothman, R. (1990). Educators focus on ways to boost student motivation. Education Week, 17. 11-13. Saifuddin Haji Masduki. (1997). Motivasi belajar dan harga diri; Hubungan dengan pencapaian akademik dun kegiatan kokurikulum pelajar sekolah menengah. Saedah, Zainon dan Tunku Mohani. (1996). Motivasi belajar dan harga diri; Hubungan dengan pencapaian akademik dan kegiatan kokurikulum pelajar sekolah menengah. Schraw, G., Horn, C, Thorndike-Christ, T & Bruning, R. (1995). Academic goal orientation and student achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20; 359-368. Shea, P. (1994). How to Develope and Present StaffTraining Courses. Edisi kedua. New Jersey; Kogan Page LTD. Shiv Khera. (1998). Motivasi belajar dun harga diri; Hubungan dengan pencapaian akademik dan kegiatan kokurikulum pelajar sekolah menengah. Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Psychology. In search of the human mind. Third Edition, Prentice Hall. Suhaimi Zakaria. (1991). Dilema disiplin. Wawasan. Jun 1991. Snyder & S preitzer. (1989). (Faktor-faktor yang menghalang penglibatan pelajar dalam Kegiatan kokurikulum sukan di kalangan pelajar Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Daerah Seremban. Tennan, Lewis M. (1930). Genetic studies of genius: Mental andphysical traits of a thousand gifted children (Vol 1). Stanford, CA;Standford University Press. T. Subahan Mohd Meerah & Abd. Rashid Johar. (1996). Seminar Kebangsaan Pendidikan Negara Abad ke 21. Tinklin, T., Croxford, L., Frame, B., Ducklin. A. (2000). Gender and Pupil Performance in Scotland. Toh Hon Leong. (2000). Rahsia pelajar cemerlang. Utusan Publication & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Kuala Lumpur. Van Zile-Tamsen, C.V. (1998). Examining metacognitive self-regulation within the context of daily academic tasks. Doctoral Dissertation, The State University of New York. (1998). Dissertation Abstracts International. Wee Eng Hoe. (1996). Faktor-faktor yang menghalang penglibatan pelajar dalam Kegiatan kokurikulum sukan di kalangan pelajar Sekolah Menengah Kebangsaan Daerah Seremban. Witkin, H. A., Oltnam, P. K., Raskin, E. & Karp, S. A. (1971). Group EmbeddedFigure Test Manual. Palo Alto. C. A; Consulting Psychologist Press. Yahya Don. (1999). Hubungan penagihan dadah dengan perlakuan jenayah; Pengaruh faktor-faktor psikososial dan Institusi terpilih. Tesis sarjana pendidikan. Tidak diterbitkan, Universiti Utara Malaysia. |