Top management perception towards green innovation implementation in government-linked companies

The focus of this study is to explore the top management perception towards green innovation implementation in the Government-Linked Companies by understanding: (i) the impact of green concept on innovation implementation in the company and its directives, (ii) how top management value green innovat...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Noormaizatul Akmar, Ishak
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2015
Subjects:	HD28-70 Management Industrial Management
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/4937/1/s92503.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4937/2/s92503_abstract.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.4937
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Ahmad, Hartini
topic	HD28-70 Management Industrial Management
spellingShingle	HD28-70 Management Industrial Management Noormaizatul Akmar, Ishak Top management perception towards green innovation implementation in government-linked companies
description	The focus of this study is to explore the top management perception towards green innovation implementation in the Government-Linked Companies by understanding: (i) the impact of green concept on innovation implementation in the company and its directives, (ii) how top management value green innovation and their leadership attributes, (iii) innovation that is widely diffused, and (iv) the significance of green innovation to organizational sustainability. The participants involved were top managers from two Government-Linked Investment Companies, 11 Government-Linked Companies and two Multinational Companies. Purposive sampling technique was chosen to select the people to be interviewed, and multiple-case sampling was chosen for organizations because it added certainty to findings. The interviews transcriptions were transferred to the NVivo, a computer assisted qualitative data analysis systems (CAQDAS), to help in data managing and themes generating. Open-coding resulted in 67 unique codes and were reduced to axial coding (major themes) and further collapsed into four group themes of selective coding. Findings of the study indicated that green innovation implementation concept had an impact on image and future projects allocation by the government. The study also revealed that the top management was responsible for green innovation directives due to companies' bottom lines. The finding also showed that data fitted the working model for leadership attributes by combining Situational Leadership and Strategic Leadership into Eco-Situational Strategic Leadership where sustainability was positioned as an opportunity for dominant foundation of competitive advantage and corporate survival especially when technological green innovation was widely diffused in the companies. This study also proposed the Green Pinnacle Model to understand the significance of green innovation to organizational sustainability
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Ph.D.
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Noormaizatul Akmar, Ishak
author_facet	Noormaizatul Akmar, Ishak
author_sort	Noormaizatul Akmar, Ishak
title	Top management perception towards green innovation implementation in government-linked companies
title_short	Top management perception towards green innovation implementation in government-linked companies
title_full	Top management perception towards green innovation implementation in government-linked companies
title_fullStr	Top management perception towards green innovation implementation in government-linked companies
title_full_unstemmed	Top management perception towards green innovation implementation in government-linked companies
title_sort	top management perception towards green innovation implementation in government-linked companies
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate	2015
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/4937/1/s92503.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/4937/2/s92503_abstract.pdf
_version_	1747827831554965504
spelling	my-uum-etd.49372021-04-04T08:09:35Z Top management perception towards green innovation implementation in government-linked companies 2015 Noormaizatul Akmar, Ishak Ahmad, Hartini Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management The focus of this study is to explore the top management perception towards green innovation implementation in the Government-Linked Companies by understanding: (i) the impact of green concept on innovation implementation in the company and its directives, (ii) how top management value green innovation and their leadership attributes, (iii) innovation that is widely diffused, and (iv) the significance of green innovation to organizational sustainability. The participants involved were top managers from two Government-Linked Investment Companies, 11 Government-Linked Companies and two Multinational Companies. Purposive sampling technique was chosen to select the people to be interviewed, and multiple-case sampling was chosen for organizations because it added certainty to findings. The interviews transcriptions were transferred to the NVivo, a computer assisted qualitative data analysis systems (CAQDAS), to help in data managing and themes generating. Open-coding resulted in 67 unique codes and were reduced to axial coding (major themes) and further collapsed into four group themes of selective coding. Findings of the study indicated that green innovation implementation concept had an impact on image and future projects allocation by the government. The study also revealed that the top management was responsible for green innovation directives due to companies' bottom lines. The finding also showed that data fitted the working model for leadership attributes by combining Situational Leadership and Strategic Leadership into Eco-Situational Strategic Leadership where sustainability was positioned as an opportunity for dominant foundation of competitive advantage and corporate survival especially when technological green innovation was widely diffused in the companies. This study also proposed the Green Pinnacle Model to understand the significance of green innovation to organizational sustainability 2015 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/4937/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/4937/1/s92503.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/4937/2/s92503_abstract.pdf text eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Alhadid, A. Y., & As'ad, H. A-R. (2014). The Impact of Green Innovation on Organizational Performance, Environmental Management Behavior as a Moderate Variable: An Analytical Study on Nuqul Group in Jordan. International Journal of Business and Management 9(7), 51-58. Allen, T., Katz, R., Grady, J. J., & Slavin, N. (1988). Project team aging and performance: The roles of project and functional managers. R&D Management, 18, 295-308. Altman, M. (2001). When green isn't mean: economic theory and the heuristics of the impact of environmental regulations on competitiveness and opportunity cost. Ecological Economics, 36(1), 31-44. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 10, 123-167. Ancona, D. G., & Caldwell, D. F. (1988). Beyond task and maintenance: Defining external functions in groups. Group and Organization Studies, 13, 468-494. Andrews, F. M., & Farris, G. F. (1967). Supervisory practices and innovation in scientific teams. Personnel Psychology, 20, 497-515. Antonakis, J., & House, R. J. (2014). Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extention of transformational-transactional leadership theosy. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), 746-771. Avery, G. C., & Bergsteiner, H. (2011). How BMW successfully practices sustainable leadership principles. Strategy & Leadership, 39(6), 11-18. Baba, Y., & Yarime, M. (1999, February 3). Identifying the Sources of Green Innovation: Markets or Regulations? Paper presented at the EcoDesign '99: First International Symposium On Environmentally Conscious Design and Inverse Manufacturing, 1999. Proceedings., Tokyo. Bailey, C. A. (2007). A guide to qualitative field research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. The Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736. Barbour, R. S. (2008). Introducing Qualitative Research. London: Sage. Barczak, G., & Wilemon, D. (1989). Leadership differences in new product development teams. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 6, 259-267. Barnowe, J. T. (1975). Leadership and performance outcomes in research organizations: The supervisor of scientists as a source of assistance. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 14, 264-280. Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press. Bass, B. M. (1997). Does the transactional-transformational paradigm transcend organizational and ational boundaries? American Psychologist, 22, 130-142. Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (1990). Developing transformational leadership: 1992 and beyond. Journal of European Industrial Training, 14, 21-27. Berkhout, A. J., Hartmann, D., Duin, P. v. d., & Ortt, R. (2006). Innovating the innovation process. International Journal of Technology Management, 34(3-4), 390-404. Bocken, N. M. P., Farracho, M., Bosworth, R., & Kemp, R. (2014). The front-end of eco-innovation for ecoinnovative small and medium sized companies. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 31, 43-57. Bogdan, R., & Taylor, S. (1975). Introduction to qualitative research methods. New York: John Wiley. Bradbury-Jones, C., Taylor, J., & Herber, O. (2014). How theory is used and articulated in qualitative research: Development of a new typology. Social Science & Medicine, 120, 135-141. Branzei, O., Vertinsky, I., & Zietsma, C. (2000). From green-blindness to the pursuit of eco-sustainability: an empirical investigation of leader cognitions and corporate environmental strategy choices. In S. Havlovic (Ed.), Academy of Management Best Paper Proceedings (pp. 1-6). Toronto, ON: Academy of Management. Bryman, A. (1984). The debate about quantitative and qualitative research: a question of method or epistemology? The British Journal of Sociology, 35(1), 75-92. Bryman, A., & Bell, E. (2007). Business research methods (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press. Burkett, K. W., & Morris, E. J. (20i5). Enabling Trust in Qualitative Research With Culturally Diverse Participants. Journal of Pediatric Health Care, 29(1), 108- 112. Burns, J. M. (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row. Carrillo-Hermosillaa, J., Riob, P. d., & Konnolac, T. (2010). Diversity of ecoinnovations: Reflections from selected case studies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(10-11), 1073-1083. Cavazottea, F., Morenob, V., & Hickmann, M. (2012). Effects of leader intelligence, personality and emotional intelligence on transformational leadership and managerial performance. The Leadership Quarterly 23(3), 443-455. Chang, C.-H., & Chen, Y.-S. (2013). Green organizational identity and green innovation. Management Decision, 51(5), 1056-1070. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Los Angeles: SAGE Publications. Chen, Y.-S., Lai, S.-B., & Wen, C.-T. (2006). The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan. Journal of Business Ethics, 67(4), 331-339. Cheng, C. C. J., Yang, C.-l., & Sheu, C. (2014). The link between eco-innovation and business performance: a Taiwanese industry context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 81-90. Cooper, C., O'Cathain, A., Hind, D., Adamson, J., Lawton, J., & Baird, W. (2014). Conducting qualitative research within Clinical Trials Units: Avoiding potential pitfalls Contemporary Clinical Trials, 38(2), 338-343. Cooper, R. G., & Kleinschmidt, E. J. (1987). New products: What separates winners from losers? Journal of Product Innovation Management, 4, 169-184. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design: choosing among five approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Daft, R. L. (1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 193-210. Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (2001). The dynamics of the adoption of product and process innovations in organizations. Journal of Management Studies, 38(1), 45-65. Dansereau, F., Cashman, J., & Graen, G. (1973). Instrumentality theory and equity theory as complementary approaches in predicting the relationship of leadership and turnover among managers Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 10, 184-200. Dansereau, F., Graen, G., & Haga, W. J. (1975). A vertical dyad linkage approach to leadership within formal organizations: A longitudinal investigation of the role making process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: the discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Derksen, A. A. (1986). The justificational priority of science over the Philosophy of Science: Laudan's science and hypothesis. Chicago Journals (Philosophy of Science Association), 53(2), 259-264. Dimitrios, N. K., P. Sakasa, D., & D. S. Vlachosa. (2013 ). Analysis of strategic leadership models in information technology. Paper presented at the 2nd International Conference on Integrated Information, Greece. Ding, F., Li, D., & George, J. F. (2014). Investigating the effects of IS strategic leadership on organizational benefits from the perspective of CIO strategic roles. Information & Management 51, 865-879. Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Ali, S. S. (2015). Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 120-132. Duchon, D., Green, S. G., & Taber, T. D. (1986). Vertical dyad linkage exchange: A longitudinal assessment of antecedents, measures, and consequences. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 56-60. Eiadat, Y., Kelly, A., Roche, F., & Eyadat, H. (2008). Green and competitive? An empirical test of the mediating role of environmental innovation strategy. Journal of World Business, 43(2), 131-145. Elkins, T., & Keller, R. T. (2003). Leadership in research and development organizations: A literature review and conceptual framework. The Leadership Quarterly, 14(4-5), 587-606. Emblemsvag, J. (2003). The green invisible hand. Foresight, 5(1), 11-19. Engelen, A., Schmidt, S., Strenger., & Brettel, M. (2014). Top Management's Transformational Leader Behaviors and Innovation Orientation: A Cross-Cultural Perspective in Eight Countries. Journal of International Management, 20(2), 124-136. Etsy, D. C., & Winston, A. S. (2009). Green to Gold: how smart companies use environmental strategy to innovate, create value, and build competitive advantage. New Jersey: John Wiley and Son, Inc. Fagerberg, J., Mowery, D. C., & Nelson, R. R. (2006). The Oxford Handbook of Innovation. USA: Oxford University Press. Farris, G. F. (1988). Technical leadership: much discussed but little understood Research Technology Management, 31(2), 12-16. Flick, U. (2002). Qualitative research: state of the art. Social Science Information, 41(1), 5-24. Gabriel, C. (2008). Why it's not naive to be green. Business Information Review, 25(4), 230-237. Gerstner, C. R., & Day, D. V. (1997). Meta-analytic review of leader-member exchange theory: Correlates and construct issues. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 827-844. Ghisetti, C., & Rewings, K. (2014). Environmental innovations and profitability: how does it pay to be green? An empirical analysis on the German innovation survey. Journal of Cleaner Production 75, 106- 117. Gibbs, G. R. (2007). Analyzing qualitative data. In U. Flick (Ed.), The SAGE qualitative research kit. London: SAGE Publication. Glesne, C., & Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. White Plains, NY: Longman. Graen, G. (1976). Role-making processes within complex organizations. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (pp. 1201-1245). Chicago: Rand McNally. Graen, G., & Cashman, J. (1975). A role-making model of leadership in formal organizations: A development approach. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Leadership frontiers (pp. 143-165). Kent, OH: Kent State University. Graen, G., & Scandura, T. (1987). Toward a psychology of dyadic organizing. In B. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 9, pp. 175-208). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. Graen, G., Scandura, T., & Graen, M. R. (1986). A field experimental test of the moderating effects of growth need strength on productivity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 484-491. Graen, G., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1991). The transformation of work group professionals into self-managing and partially self-designing contributors: Toward a theory of leadership-making. Journal of Management Systems, 3, 33-48. Graen, G., & Uhl-Bien, M. (1995). Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member-exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years-Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective. Leadership Quarterly, 6, 219-247. Green, K., Morton, B., & New, S. (2000). Greening organizations : purchasing, consumption, and innovation. Organization & Environment, 13(2), 206-225. Green, S. G. (1995). Top management support of R&D projects: A strategic leadership perspective. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42, 223-232. Griffin, R. W., & Moorhead, G. (2013). Organizational Behavior: Managing People and Organizations (11 th ed.). Mason, Ohio, USA: Cengage Learning. Hallstedt, S. I., Thompson, A. W., & Lindahl, P. (2013). Key elements for implementing a strategic sustainability perspective in the product innovation process. Journal of Cleaner Production, 51, 277-288. Hambrick, D. (1989). Guest editor's introduction: Putting top managers back in the strategy picture. Strategic Management Journal, 10, 5-15. Henry, J. R., & Vesilind, P. A. (2005). Ethical motivations for green business and engineering. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 7(4), 252-258. Nenwood, K. (2014). Qualitative Research. Encyclopedia of Critical Psychology, 1611-1614. Heracleous, L. (2007). Hermeneutics, International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies. Herriott, R. E., & Firestone, W. A. (1983). Multisite qualitative policy research: Optimizing description and generalizability. Educational Research, 12, 14- 19. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., Johnson, R. A., & Moesel, D. D. (1996). The market for corporate control and firm innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1084-1119. Ho, H. P.-Y., & Choi, T.-M. (2012). A Five-R analysis for sustainable fashion supply chain management in Hong Kong: a case analysis. Journal of Fashion Marketing and Management, 16(2), 1361-2026. House, R. J. (1971). A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 16, 321-338. House, R. J., & Aditya, R. N. (1997). The social scientific study of leadership: Quo vadis. Journal of Management, 23, 409-473. House, R. J., & Dessler, G. (1974). The path-goal theory of leadership: Some post hoc and a priori tests. In J. G. Hunt & L. L. Larson (Eds.), Contingency approaches to leadership (pp. 29-55). Carbondale Southern Illinois Press. Howell, J. M., & Higgins, C. A. (1990a). Champions of technological innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 317-341. Howell, J. M., & Higgins, C. A. (1990b). Leadership behaviors, influence tactics, and career experiences of technological innovation. Leadership Quarterly, 1, 249-264. Ibrahim, S. G., & Uke, I. I. (2013). From Kyoto Protocol to Copenhagen: A theoretical approach to international politics of climate changeical Science and African Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 7(3), 142- 153. Insight, E. (2013). AU Optronics Corporation leads in green innovation. Strategic Direction 29 (7), 21-24. International, Q. (2011). Retrieved 7 July, 2011, from http://www.qsrinternational.com/products_ previous-products_nvivo8.aspx. Jabri, M. (1991). The development of conceptually independent subscales in the measurement of modes of problem solving. Educational and Psychological Measurement 52, 975-983. Jalal, K. F., & Rogers, P. P. (2002). Measuring environmental performance in Asia. Ecological Indicators, 2(1-2), 39-59. Kadushin, C., Hecht, S., Sasson, T., & Saxe, L. (2008). Triangulation and mixed methods designs: practicing what we preach in the evaluation of an Israel experience educational program. Field Methods, 20(1), 46-65. Karim, F. N. (2010, April 27). Tax breaks for green designs. New Straits Times, p. 4. Katz, R., & Tushman, M. (1981). An investigation into the managerial roles and career paths of gatekeepers and project supervisor in a major R&D facility. R&D Management, 11, 103-110. Keller, R. T. (1989). A test of the path-goal theory of leadership with need for clarity as a moderator in research and development organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 74, 208-212. Keller, R. T. (1992). Transformational leadership and the performance of research and development project groups. Journal of Management, 18, 489-501. Keller, R. T. (1995). Transformational leaders make a difference. Research Technology Management, 38, 41-44, Keskin, D., Diehl, J. C., & Molenaar, N. (2013). Innovation process of new ventures driven by sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 45, 50-60. Kim, Y., Min, B., & Cha, J. (1999). The roles of R&D team leaders in Korea: A contingent approach. R&D Management, 29, 153-165. Kirchmer, M., Franz, P., & Rosing, M. v. (2015). The Chief Process Officer: An Emerging Top Leadership Role. The Business Process Management Handbook, 343-348. Kiron, D., Kruschwitz, N., Haanaes, K., Reeves, M., & Goh, E. (2013). The benefits of Sustainability-Driven Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 54(2), 69-73. Kiron, D., Kruschwitz, N., Haanaes, K., & Velken, I. V. S. (2012). Sustainability Nears a Tipping Point. MIT Sloan Management Review, 53(2), 69-74. Kirton, M. J. (1976). Adaptors and innovators: A description and measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 622-629. Klewitz, J., & Hansen, E. G. (2014). Sustainability-oriented innovation of SMEs: a systematic review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 65, 57-75. Krell, T. C. (2000). Organizational longevity and technological change. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 13(1), 8- 13. Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. London: SAGE Publications. Krugman, P. (2010). Building a Green Economy, The New York Times (Magazine ed.). New York. Kuzel, A. J. (1992). Sampling in qualitative inquiry. In B. F. Crabtree & W. L. Miller (Eds.), Doing qualitative research (Vol. Research Method for Primary Case, Vol 3, pp. 31-44). Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Lau, Y. W. (2013). Government-linked companies' (GLCs) performance - a structuration perspective: Malaysian evidence. International Journal of Critical Accotlnting, 5(2), 213-227. Lee, K.-H. (2009). Why and how to adopt green management into business organizations? The case study of Korean SMEs in manufacturing industry. Management Decision, 47(7), 1101-1121. Li, Y. (2014). Environmental innovation practices and performance: moderating effect of resource commitment. Journal of cleaner Production 66, 450-458. Liden, R. C., & Graen, G. (1980). Generalizability of the vertical dyad linkage model of leadership. Academy of Management Journal, 23, 451-465. Lin, H., Zeng, S. X., Ma, H. Y., Qi, G. Y., & Tam, V. W. Y. (2014). Can political capital drive corporate green innovation? Lessons from China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 63-72. Lin, R.-J., Chen, R.-H., & Huang, F.-H. (2014). Green innovation in the automobile industry. Industrial Management & Data Systems, 114(6), 886-903. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). The Only Generalization is: There Is No Generalization In R. Gomm, M. Harnmersley & P. Foster (Eds.), Case Study Method: Key Issues, Key Texts: Sage. Litosseliti, L. (2003). Using focus groups in research. London: Continuum. Lowe, K. B., Kroeck, K., & Sivasubramaniam, N. (1996). Effectiveness correlates of transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic review of the MLQ literature. Leadership Quarterly, 7, 385-425. Marham, S. K., Green, S. G., & Basu, G. (1991). Champions and antagonists: Relationships with R&D project characteristics and management Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 8, 217-242. Menke, M., Xu, Q., & Gu, L. (2007). An analysis of the university, flexibility, and agility of total innovation management: a case study of Hewlett-Packard. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 32, 49-62. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). An Expanded Sourcebook Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd. ed.). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Miles, R. E., Snow, C. C., & Miles, G. (2007). The ideology of innovation. Strategic Organization, 5(4), 423-435. Mingers, J. (2003). A classification of the philosophical assumptions of management science methods. The Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(6), 559-570. Morse, J. M. (Ed.). (1989). Qualitative nursing research: A contemporary dialogu. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27-43. Mutingi, M., Mapfaira, H., & Monageng, R. (2014). Developing performance management systems for the green supply chain. Journal of Remanufacturing, 4(6), 1-20. Naranjo-Gil, D. (2009). The influence of environmental and organizational factors on innovation adoptions: consequences for performance in public sector organizations. Technovation, 29(12), 810-818. Neuman, W. L. (1991). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Nichols, A. L., & Cottrell, C. A. (2014). What do people desire in their leaders? The role of leadership level on trait desirability. The Leadership Quaterly, 25(4), 711-729. Ockwell, D., Whitmarsh, L., & O'Neill, S. (2009). Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation: forcing people to be green or fostering grass-roots engagement? Science Communication, 30(3), 305-327. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research method (2nd ed.). Newbery Park, CA: Sage. Pesqueux, Y. (2007). Epistemology, International Encyclopedia of Organization Studies. Peusa, C., Brauna, S., & Frey, D. (2013). Situation-based measurement of the full range of leadership model-Development and validation of a situational judgment test. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(5), 777-795. Porter, M. E., & Linde, C. v. d. (1995). Toward a New Conception of the Environment-Competitiveness Relationship. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97-118. Raza, A., & Murad, H. S. (2014). Learning New Management Viewpoints: Recontextualizing Strategic Leadership in Global and Regional Context. Business Review, 9(1), 115-121. Roberts, E. B., & Fusfield, A. R. (1981). Staffing the innovative technology-based organization. Sloan Management Review, 22, 19-34. Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York. Roy, J., & Pal, S. (2009). Lifestyles and climate change: link awaiting activation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 1(2), 192-200. Salahudin, S. N., Abdullah, M. M., & Newaz, N. A. (2013). Emission: Sources, Policies and Development in Malaysia. International Journal of Education and Research 1(7), 1-12. Schaltegger, S., & Synnestvedt, T. (2002). The link between 'green' and economic success: environmental management as the crucial trigger between environmental and economic performance. Journal of Environmental Management, 65(4), 339-346. Schriesheim, C. A., Castro, S. L., & Cogliser, C. G. (1999). Leader-member exchange (LMX) research: A comprehensive review of theory, measurement and data-analytic practices. Leadership Quarterly, 10, 63-113. Schriesheim, J. F., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1980). A test of the path-goal theory of leadership and some directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 33, 349-370. Schwandt, T. A. (2000). Three epistemological stances for qualitative inquiry: interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1994). Determinants of innovative behavior: A path model of individual innovation in the workplace. Academy of Management Journal, 37, 580-607. Scott, S. G., & Bruce, R. A. (1998). Following the leader in R&D: The joint effect of subordinate problem-solving style and leader-member relations on innovative behavior. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 45, 3-10. Seuring, S., & Muller, M. (2008). From a literature review to a conceptual framework for sustainable supply chain management. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(15), 1699-1710. Shim, D., & Lee, M. (2001). Upward influence styles of R&D project leaders. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 48, 394-413. Silva, L. C. S., Kovaleski, J. L., Gaia, S., Back, L., Spak, M. D. S., & Moretti, I. C. (2013). World scenario of green patents: Perspectives and strategies for the development of eco-innovations. African Journal of Business Management, 7(6), 472-479. Sorensen, F., Mattsson, J., & Sundbo, J. (2010). Experimental methods in innovation research. Research Policy, 39(3), 313-322. Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications. Stead, J. G., & Stead, W. E. (2013). Sustainable Strategic Management (2nd ed.). Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing Limited. Stenmark, C. K., & Mumford, M. D. (2011). Situational impacts on leader ethical decision-making. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(5), 942-955. Stinson, J. E., & Johnson, T. W. (1975). The path-goal theory of leadership: A partial test and suggested refinement. Academy of Management Journal, 18, 242-252. Strand, R. (2014). Strategic Leadership of Corporate Sustainability. Journal Business Ethics, 123, 687-706. Suriyankietkaew, S., & Avery, G. C. (2014). Employee satisfaction and sustainable leadership practices in Thai SMEs Journal of Global Responsibility, 5(1), 160-173. Tabor, J. H. (2007). Leadership, culture, and organizational innovation: the case of commerce bank? ProQuest (pp. 243): School of Professional Studies, Gonzaga University, USA. Thurmond, V. A. (2001). The Point of Triangulation. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 33(3), 253-258. Tierney, P., Farmer, S. M., & Graen, G. (1999). An examination of leadership and employee creativity: The relevance of traits and relationships. Personnel Psychology, 52, 591-620. Todtling, F., Lehner, P., & Kaufmann, A. (2009). Do different types of innovation rely on specific kinds of knowledge interactions? Technovation, 29(1), 59-71. Triguero, A., Moreno-Mondkjar, L., & Davia, M. A. (2013). Drivers of different types of eco-innovation in European SMEs. Ecological Economics 92, 25-33. Trott, P. (2001). The role of market research in the development of discontinuous new products. European Journal of lnnovation Management, 4(3), 117-126. Ulhoi, J. P., Madsen, H., & Hildebrandt, S. (1996). Green new world: a corporate environmental business perspective Scandinavian Journal of Management, 12(3), 243-254. UNFCCC. (2009). The Kyoto Protocol Retrieved May 5, 2010, from http://unfccc.int/kyoto_protocol/items/283O.php. Vitale, D. C., Armenakis, A. A., & Field, H. S. (2008).Integrating qualitative and quantitative methods for organizational diagnosis : possible priming effects? Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2(1), 87-105. Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (2007). The role of the situation in leadership. American Psychologist, 62, 17-24. Waldman, D., & Atwater, L. (1992). The nature of effective leadership and championing processes at different level in an R&D hierarchy. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 5 233-245. Waldman, D. A., & Bass, B. M. (1991). Transformational leadership at different phases of the innovation process. Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2 169-180. Wray, N., Markovic, M., & Manderson, L. (2007). "Research saturation": the impact of data triangulation and intensive-research practices on the researcher and qualitative research process. Qualitative Health Research, 17(10), 1392-1402. Xu, E., & Zhang, H. (2008). The impact of state shares on corporate innovation strategy and performance in China. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25, 473-487. Yauch, C. A., & Steudel, H. J. (2003). Complementary use of qualitative and quantitative cultural assessment methods. Organizational Research Methods, 6(4), 465-481. Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: design and methods (5th ed. Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications. Yu, C.-S., & Tao, Y.-H. (2009). Understanding business-level innovation technology adoption. Technovation, 29(2), 92-109. Zhu, Q., Sarkis, J., & Lai, K.-11. (2007). Green supply chain management: pressures, practices and performance within the Chinese automobile industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15(11-12), 1041-1052.

Top management perception towards green innovation implementation in government-linked companies

Similar Items