The development of track two diplomacy in Indonesian led workshop on managing conflict in the South China Sea, 1990-2002

The development of track two diplomacy in Indonesian led workshop on managing conflict in the South China Sea, 1990-2002

Conflict in the South China Sea became a flashpoint in Southeast Asia in the 1970s. Located in a strategic area which has important sea lanes and rich in living and non-living resources, the South China Sea is claimed by six states namely China, Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Satyawan, lgnatius Agung
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2015
Subjects:
JZ International relations
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/5302/1/s91560.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/5302/2/s91560_abstract.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.5302
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Darshan Singh, Ranjit Singh
topic JZ International relations
spellingShingle JZ International relations
Satyawan, lgnatius Agung
The development of track two diplomacy in Indonesian led workshop on managing conflict in the South China Sea, 1990-2002
description Conflict in the South China Sea became a flashpoint in Southeast Asia in the 1970s. Located in a strategic area which has important sea lanes and rich in living and non-living resources, the South China Sea is claimed by six states namely China, Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei. However, in that period, there was no formal forum like the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) through which the conflict could be handled and as a result, Track Two Diplomacy was applied to manage the conflict through a series of meetings entitled “Workshop on Managing Potential Conflict in the South China Sea” led by Indonesia from 1990 to 2002. The statement of the problem of the thesis is why Track Two Diplomacy was chosen as a suitable mechanism to manage the conflict and to what extent was this experiment successful and effective. The objectives of the study are as follows: firstly, to examine the reasons for the deployment of Track Two Diplomacy as a mechanism of conflict management and Indonesian support for the workshop; secondly, to investigate the process, outcomes and effectiveness of the workshop. This research employs the qualitative method whereby a case study of the workshop is undertaken. Both primary and secondary data are analyzed. Theories used in this research are Constructivism which provides understanding on how socialization, identity and norms guide behaviour of states and Functionalism which stresses on promoting cooperation to enhance peace. The significance of this study is to suggest ways in which Track Two Diplomacy can be usefully deployed in managing conflicts in the South China Sea and elsewhere. The findings of this study are as follows: firstly, the interactive process of dialogue developed by the workshop has been able to create a sense of community and norms building. Secondly, the workshop succeeded to establish functional cooperation in less sensitive issues. Thirdly, the workshop further enhanced the concept of Track Two Diplomacy. Finally, the workshop was able to maintain peace in the region as indicated by absence of major military conflict since 1990
format Thesis
qualification_name Ph.D.
qualification_level Doctorate
author Satyawan, lgnatius Agung
author_facet Satyawan, lgnatius Agung
author_sort Satyawan, lgnatius Agung
title The development of track two diplomacy in Indonesian led workshop on managing conflict in the South China Sea, 1990-2002
title_short The development of track two diplomacy in Indonesian led workshop on managing conflict in the South China Sea, 1990-2002
title_full The development of track two diplomacy in Indonesian led workshop on managing conflict in the South China Sea, 1990-2002
title_fullStr The development of track two diplomacy in Indonesian led workshop on managing conflict in the South China Sea, 1990-2002
title_full_unstemmed The development of track two diplomacy in Indonesian led workshop on managing conflict in the South China Sea, 1990-2002
title_sort development of track two diplomacy in indonesian led workshop on managing conflict in the south china sea, 1990-2002
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government
publishDate 2015
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/5302/1/s91560.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/5302/2/s91560_abstract.pdf
_version_ 1747827903666585600
spelling my-uum-etd.53022021-04-05T01:16:09Z The development of track two diplomacy in Indonesian led workshop on managing conflict in the South China Sea, 1990-2002 2015 Satyawan, lgnatius Agung Darshan Singh, Ranjit Singh Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government JZ International relations Conflict in the South China Sea became a flashpoint in Southeast Asia in the 1970s. Located in a strategic area which has important sea lanes and rich in living and non-living resources, the South China Sea is claimed by six states namely China, Taiwan, the Philippines, Vietnam, Malaysia and Brunei. However, in that period, there was no formal forum like the ASEAN Regional Forum (ARF) through which the conflict could be handled and as a result, Track Two Diplomacy was applied to manage the conflict through a series of meetings entitled “Workshop on Managing Potential Conflict in the South China Sea” led by Indonesia from 1990 to 2002. The statement of the problem of the thesis is why Track Two Diplomacy was chosen as a suitable mechanism to manage the conflict and to what extent was this experiment successful and effective. The objectives of the study are as follows: firstly, to examine the reasons for the deployment of Track Two Diplomacy as a mechanism of conflict management and Indonesian support for the workshop; secondly, to investigate the process, outcomes and effectiveness of the workshop. This research employs the qualitative method whereby a case study of the workshop is undertaken. Both primary and secondary data are analyzed. Theories used in this research are Constructivism which provides understanding on how socialization, identity and norms guide behaviour of states and Functionalism which stresses on promoting cooperation to enhance peace. The significance of this study is to suggest ways in which Track Two Diplomacy can be usefully deployed in managing conflicts in the South China Sea and elsewhere. The findings of this study are as follows: firstly, the interactive process of dialogue developed by the workshop has been able to create a sense of community and norms building. Secondly, the workshop succeeded to establish functional cooperation in less sensitive issues. Thirdly, the workshop further enhanced the concept of Track Two Diplomacy. Finally, the workshop was able to maintain peace in the region as indicated by absence of major military conflict since 1990 2015 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/5302/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/5302/1/s91560.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/5302/2/s91560_abstract.pdf text eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia A. Primary Sources Speeches Alatas, A. (1990, January, 22). Transcript of the opening speech. Report of the first workshop on managing potential conflicts in the South China Sea. Bali. Alatas, A. (1991, July 15). Transcript of the Opening Speech. Report of the second workshop on managing potential conflicts in the South China Sea. Bandung. Alatas, A. (1992, June 29). Transcript of the opening speech. Report of the third workshop on managing potential conflicts in the South China Sea. Yogyakarta. Alatas, A. (1994, October 26). Transcript of the opening speech. Report of the fifth workshop on managing potential conflicts in the South China Sea. Bukittinggi. Alatas, A. (1995, October 9). Transcript of the opening speech. Report of the sixth workshop on managing potential conflicts in the South China Sea. Balikpapan. Djalal, H. (1990, January 22). Transcript of the opening remarks. Report of the first workshop on managing potential conflicts in the South China Sea. Bali. Severino, R. (2001, September 3). The ASEAN way and the rule of law. Speech at the International Law Conference on ASEAN Legal System and Regional Integration, Kuala Lumpur. Retrieved from http://www.asean.org/resources/2012-02-10-08-47-56/speeches-statementsof- the-former-secretaries-general-of-asean/item/the-asean-way-and-the-ruleof- law Suharto‟s Presidency Speech in 1968. Retrieved from www.bappenas.go.id/getfile- server/node/7199/ Weihong, Z. (1991, July 15). Transcript of speech on issues of territory and jurisdiction. Report of the Second Workshop on Managing Potential Conflict in the South China Sea. Bandung. Ying-wang, W. (1991, July 16). Transcript of speech on political and security issues. Report of the Second Workshop on Managing Potential Conflict in the South China Sea. Bandung. 270 Reports Cossa, R. A. (1998). Security implications of conflict in the South China Sea: Exploring potential triggers of conflict. A Pacific Forum CSIS Special Report. Honolulu. Retrieved from http://www.southchinasea.org/files/2012/03/Cossa-Security-Implicationsof- Conflict-in-the-S.ChinaSea.pdf Kemper, B. (2007). Mediation in intrastate conflicts: The contribution of tracktwo mediation activities to prevent violence in the Aceh conflict. INEF Report no. 88. Retrieved from http://inef.unidue. de/page/documents/Report88.pdf McManus, T. (2000). Transboundary diagnostic analysis for the South China Sea. EAS/RCU Technical Report Series No. 14. UNEP, Bangkok, Thailand. http://www.unepSouth China Sea.org/remository/download/313/chk,2790f417eecc2d623a89b9dbadc03c9 c/no_html,1.html Report of the first workshop on managing potential conflicts in the South China Sea. (1990, January 22-24). Bali. Report of the second workshop on managing potential conflicts in the South China Sea. (1991, July 15-18). Bandung. Report of the third workshop on managing potential conflict in the South China Sea. (1992, June 29-July 2). Yogyakarta. Report of the fourth workshop on managing potential conflicts in the South China Sea. (1993, August 23-25). Surabaya. Report of the fifth workshop on managing potential conflict in the South China Sea. (1994, October 26-28.). Bukittinggi. Report of the sixth workshop on managing potential conflict in the South China Sea. (1995, October 9-13). Balikpapan. Report of the seventh workshop on managing potential conflicts in the South China Sea. (1996, December 13-17). Batam. Report of the eight workshop on managing potential conflicts in the South China Sea. (1997, December 2-6). Pacet-Puncak. Report of the ninth workshop on managing potential conflict in the South China Sea. (1998, December 1-3). Ancol-Jakarta. Report of the tenth workshop on managing potential conflict in the South China Sea. (1999, October 5-8). Bogor. 271 Report of the eleventh workshop on managing potential conflicts in the South China Sea. (2001, March 26-29). Banten. Report of the twelfth workshop on managing potential conflict in the South China Sea. (2002, September 30- October 4). Jakarta. Statements Statement of the second meeting of the technical working group on marine scientific research. (1993, August 24). Surabaya. Statement of the third meeting of technical working group on marine scientific research. (1994, April 24-29). Singapore. Statement of the fifth meeting of the technical working group on marine scientific research. (1996, July 14-17). Cebu. Statement of the first meeting of the technical working group on marine environment protection. (1994, October 6-8). Hangzhou. Statement of the second meeting of the technical working group on marine environment protection. (1997, October 14-15). Haikou. Statement of the first meeting of the technical working group on safety of navigation, shipping and communication. (1995, October 3-6). Jakarta. Statement of the second meeting of the technical working group on safety of navigation, shipping and communication. (1996, October 29-November 1). Bandar Seri Begawan. Statement of the First Meeting of group of expert on marine environment protection. (1997, June 8-11). Phnom Penh. Statement of the first meeting of the technical working group on resource assessment and ways of development. (1993, July, 5-6). Jakarta. Statement of the meeting of the study group on zone of cooperation. (1998, June 15-18). Vientiane. Documents ASEAN Secretariat. (1976). Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia. Retrieved from http://www.asean.org/news/item/treaty-of-amity-andcooperation- in-southeast-asia-indonesia-24-february-1976-3 Asianinfo. (n. d.). Indonesia‟s geography. Retrieved from http://www.asianinfo.org/asianinfo/indonesia/pro-geography.htm Cairo and Postdam Declaration. (n. d.). Retrieved from http://www.civiltaiwan. org/cairo-potsdam.htm 272 Charter of the United Nations. (1945). Retrieved from http://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/CTC/uncharter.pdf Declaration of ASEAN Concord. (1976, February 24). Retrieved from http://www.aseansec.org/5049.htm Indonesia: Economy. (n. d.). Retrieved from http://globaledge.msu.edu/countries/indonesia/economy Intelligent Report. (1973). Peking‟s support of insurgencies in Southeast Asia. Retrieved from http://www.foia.cia.gov/sites/default/files/document_conversions/14/polo- 37.pdf International recognition of China's sovereignty over the Nansha Islands. (2000, November 17). Retrieved from http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/topics/3754/t19232.htm Jurisprudential evidence to support China's sovereignty over the Nansha Islands. (2000, November 17). Retrieved from http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/topics/3754/t19234.htm Kebijakan Suharto Meracik Ekonomi Orde Baru [Suharto‟s Policy to Develop New Order Economy]. (2008, February 16). Retrieved from http://tribunindonesia.wordpress.com/2008/02/16/kebijakan-suhartomeracik- ekonomi-orde-baru/ Ministry of State Secretariat of the Republic of Indonesia, n. d. The 1945 Constitution of the State of the Republic of Indonesia. Retrieved from http://www.setneg.go.id/images/stories/kepmen/legal_product/uud_1945.pdf Ministry of Trade the Republic of Indonesia. (2011, April), Trade Statistic. NUS Centre of International Law. (2009). Curriculum Vitae of Hasjim Djalal. Retrieved from http://cil.nus.edu.sg/about-2/cil-global-associates/hasjimdjalal/ Official Indonesian Government website. (n. d.). The Geography of Indonesia. Retrieved from http://www.indonesia.go.id/en/indonesia-glance/geographyindonesia. Petroleum, Liquefied Natural Gas, and Coal. (n. d.). Retrieved from http://www.asiatradehub.com/indonesia/oil.asp The ASEAN Secretariat. (2004). ASEAN Statistical Yearbook 2003. Jakarta. The United Nations. (1982). Comprehensive study on confidence-building measures. New York: United Nations Publication. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/disarmament/HomePage/ODAPublications/Disarmament StudySeries/PDF/SS-7.pdf 273 Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia. (1976, February 24). Retieved from http://www.asean.org/1217.htm United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. (1982). Retrieved from http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/unclos_e.p df United States Institute of Peace. (2008). Conflict Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.usip.org/sites/default/files/ETCI/ Online%20Courses/Conflict_Analysis_1-30-08.pdf US. Department of State Office of the Historian. (n. d.). Milestones: 1953–1960. Retrieved from https://history.state.gov/milestones/1953-1960/bandungconf Waters Space under the UNCLOS. (n. d.). Retrieved from http://geography.about.com/library/misc/uceez.htm Workshop Papers Coquia, J. R. (1990, January 22). Navigation, communication and shipping in the South China Sea. Paper presented at the First Workshop on Managing Potential Conflict in the South China Sea. Bali. Fernandez, G. S. (1991, July 15), Navigation, shipping and communications in the South China Sea. Paper presented at the Second Workshop on Managing Potential Conflict in the South China Sea. Bandung. Gamboa, E. (1992, June 30). A proposal for a cooperative petroleum resource research and assessment for the South China Sea. Paper presented at the Third Workshop on Managing Potential Conflict in the South China Sea. Yogyakarta. Gault, I. T. (1990, January 23). Reflection on institutions and mechanism. Paper presented at the First Workshop on Managing Potential Conflict in the South China Sea. Bali. Gold, E. (1990, January 23). Maritime navigation: Precedent for international cooperation. Paper presented at the First Workshop on Managing Potential Conflict in the South China Sea. Bali. Hamzah, B. A. (1990, January 22). Jurisdiction issues and the conflict claims in the Spratlys. Paper presented at the First Workshop on Managing Potential Conflict in the South China Sea. Bali. Hamzah, B. A. (1991, July 16). Conflict in jurisdictional problems in the Spratlys: Scope for conflict resolution. Paper presented at the Second Workshop on Managing Potential Conflict in the South China Sea. Bandung. 274 Hongskul, V. (1990, July 16). Living resources management. Paper presented at the Second Workshop on Managing Potential Conflict in the South China Sea. Bandung. Kamaludin, D. Z. B. P.H. (1992, June 30). The basis of institutional mechanisms for cooperation. Paper presented at the Third Workshop on Managing Potential Conflict in the South China Sea. Yogyakarta. Kittichaisaree, K. (1992, June 30). Rule of the game: the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea. Paper presented at the Third Workshop on Managing Potential Conflict in the South China Sea. Yogyakarta. Kittichaisaree, K. (1998, October 12). Code of conduct in international law and relations. Paper presented at the Third Technical Working Group Meeting on Legal Matters in the South China Sea. Pattaya. Ninh, P. V. (1991, July 1). On disaster problems and some concrete proposals. Paper presented at the Third Workshop on Managing Potential Conflict in the South China Sea. Yogyakarta. Sugiarto, A. (1991, July 15). The South China Sea: Its Ecological Features and Potentials for Developing Cooperation in Marine Scientific Research and Environmental Protection. Paper presented at the Second Workshop on Managing Potential Conflictin the South China Sea. Bandung. Yilin, W. (1992, June 29-July 2). Maritime disasters and regional cooperation for mitigating in the South China Sea. Paper presented at the Third Workshop on Managing Potential Conflict in the South China Sea. Yogyakarta. Newspapers Ada Kemungkinan ABRI Mengahadapi Pertempuran di Laut Cina Selatan [It is possibility Indonesia arms forces facing battle in the South China Sea]. (1980, February 8). Kompas. Ali Alatas: Sudah waktunya lakukan kerjasama di Laut Cina Selatan [Ali Alatas: This time to do cooperation in the South China Sea]. (1995, October 11). Kompas. Cina dan Vietnam terlibat Kontak Senjata di Spratly [China and Vietnam involve arms conflict in the Spratly]. (1988, March 15). Kompas. Filipina dan Malaysia hendaknya tidak saling kaku sikap [Philippines and Malaysia should not in stick attitude], (1988, August 10). Kompas. Indonesia tingkatkan pertahanan di Natuna [Indonesia strengthen its defense in Natuna]. (1992, August 3). Kompas. Indonesia to help maintain peace in South China Sea. (1999, December 7). Jakarta Post. 275 Insiden Berdarah Vietnam – RRC di Laut Cina Selatan [Bloody incident Vietnam – PRC in the South China Sea]. (1982, March 10). Kompas. Jacob, P. (1996, September 26). Indonesia to develop Natuna next. Strait Times. Malaysia desak diskusi formal soal Spratly (Malaysia urged formal discussion on Spratly issue). (1995, June 17). Kompas. Pembelian senjata di Asia Tenggara meningkat [Arms budgeting increases in the Southeast Asia]. (1995, November 3). Kompas. News Agencies Modern pirates: Armed and ruthless. (2000, April 24). BBC News. Retrieved from http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/724753.stm Ressa, M. (1996, September 22). Indonesian war games on oil-rich island sends message. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/WORLD/9609/22/indonesia/ True story behind Huangyan Island dispute in the South China Sea (2012, May 9). Xinhua. Retrieved from. http://news.xinhuanet.com/english/china/2012- 05/09/c_123103564.htm Interviews Ambassador Dr. Boer Mauna. (2012, March, 2). Senior diplomat of Indonesia. Jakarta. Ambassador Dr. Hasjim Djalal. (2012, March, 1). Organizer of the Workshops and Director of the Center for Southeast Asian Studies. Jakarta. Dr. Ganewati Wuryandari. (2012, February, 24). Foreign Policy Analyst, Indonesian Institute of Science. Jakarta. Dr. Siswo Pramono. (2012, February, 27). Participant of the Workshop and Head of the Center for Policy Analysis and Development on Asia-Pacific and African Region, Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Jakarta. Mr. Asep Setiawan. (2012, February, 29). Journalist and observer of the Workshops. Jakarta. Mr. Ardian Budhi Nugroho. (2012, February, 28). Head of the Section for Politics and Security Cooperation, Directorate General of ASEAN Cooperation, Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Jakarta. 276 B. Secondary Sources Books Acharya, A. (2001). Constructing a security community in Southeast Asia: ASEAN and the problem of regional order. London: Routledge. Anwar, D. F. (1994). Indonesia in ASEAN: Foreign policy and regionalism, Singapore: ISEAS. Berridge, G. R. (1995). Diplomacy: theory and practice. London: Prentice Hall. Bouilding, K. (1978). Stable Peace. Texas: University of Texas Press. Catley, B., & Keliat, M. (1997). Spratlys: The dispute in the South China Sea. Singapore: Ashgate. Dougherty, J. E. & Pfaltzgrapff, R. L. (1990). Contending theories of international relations: A comprehensive survey. Third edition. New York: Harper & Row. Finnemore, M. (1996). National Interest in International Society. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. Fisher, R. J. (1997). Interactive Conflict Resolution. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press. Greenfield, J. (1992). China’s practice in the law of the sea. Oxford: Clarendon. Hatta, M. (1976). Mendayung antara dua karang [Row between two reefs], Jakarta: Bulan Bintang. Hobson, J., M. (2003). The State in International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Holsti, K. J. (1977). International politics: A Framework for analysis, third edition, Englewood Cliffs: Printice-Hall. International Business Publication. (2008). Indonesia diplomatic handbook. Washington: Global Investment Center. Jackson, R. & Sorensen, G. (2010), Introduction to international relations: theories and approaches. Oxford: University Press, Oxford Katzenstein, P. J. (1996). Cultural norms and national security: Police and military postwar Japan. Ithaca: Cornell University Press Kaye, D. S. (2007). Talking to the Enemy: Track Two Diplomacy in the Middle East and South Asia. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation. 277 Key-young, S. (2006). South Korea engagement policies and north korea: identities, norms and the Sunshine Policy. London: Routledge. Kivimaki, T. (Ed.). (2002). War or peace in the South China Sea?, Copenhagen: NIAS Press. Law of the sea briefing book (n. d.). Retrieved from http://www.virginia.edu/colp/pdf/Law_of_the_Sea_Briefing_Book.pdf Lee Lai To. (1999). China and the South China Sea dialogues. London: Praeger. Leifer, M. (1995a). Dictionary of the modern politics of Southeast Asia, New York: Routledge. Lund, M. S. (1996). Preventing violent conflict: A Strategy for Preventive Diplomacy. Washington: USIP Press Book. Mahiga, A. P. & Nji, F. M. (1987). Confidence-building measures in Africa. Geneva: United Nations Institute for Disarmament Research. Retrieved from http://www.unidir.org/files/publications/pdfs/confidence-buildingmeasures- in-africa-en-109.pdf Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. (2nd ed.). London: Sage. Odgaard, L. (2002). Maritime security between China and Southeast Asia: Conflict and cooperation in the making of regional order. Burlington: Ashgate. Onuf, N. (1989) World of our making: rules and rule in social theory and international relations. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press Pearson, F. S. & Rochester, J. M. (1988). International Relations: The Global Condition in the Late Twentieth Century, second edition, New York: McGraw-Hill. Perwita, A. A. B. (2007). Indonesia and the Muslim world: Islam and secularism in the foreign policy of Soeharto and beyond. Copenhagen: NIAS Press. Rosamond, B (2000) Theories of European integration New York: St Martin's Press. Roy, D. (1998). China’s foreign relations. Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield. Ruggie, J., G. (1998). Constructing the world polity: essays on international institutionalization. London: Routledge. Shicun, W. (2013). Solving disputes for regional cooperation and development in the South China Sea: A Chinese perspective. Oxford: Chandos Publishing. 278 Smith, A. L. (2000). Strategic Centrality: Indonesia’s Changing Role in ASEAN, Singapore: ISEAS. Song, Y. H. (1999). Managing potential conflicts in the South China Sea: Taiwan’s perspective, Singapore: Singapore University Press. Suganuma, U. (2000). Sovereign rights and territorial space in Sino-Japanese relations: Irredentism and the Diaoyu/Senkaku Islands. Honolulu: University of Hawaii. Suryadinata, L. (1998). Politik luar negeri Indonesia di bawah Soeharto [Indonesian foreign policy under Suharto], translated by (Nur Imam Subono, trans.). Jakarta: LP3ES. Thambipillai, P. & Saravanamuttu, J. (1985). ASEAN negotiation: Two insights. Singapore: Institute of Southeast Asia Studies. Valencia, M. et. al. (1997). Sharing the resources of the South China Sea. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. Waltz, K. N. (1979). Theory of international politics. New York: Random House. Weber, C. (2010). International relations theory: A critical introduction. Third edition. New York: Routledge. Wendt, A. (1999). Social theory of international politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Weissman, M. (2012). The East Asian peace: Conflict prevention and informal peace building. London: Palgrave Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and method. (3rd ed.). London: Sage. Articles Acharya, A. (2011). Norm subsidiarity and regional orders: sovereignty, regionalism, and rule-making in the third world. International Studies Quarterly, 55, 95-123 Adler, E. (2002). Constructivism and international relations. In Carlsnaes, W. Risse, T. & Simmons, B. (Eds.). Handbook of International Relations (pp. 95-118). London: Sage. Alatas, A. (2001a). ASEAN: genesis and growth. Opening address at a seminar on ASEAN strategies and actions. In Alatas. A (Ed.), Voice for a just peace: A collection of speeches (pp. 137-40). Jakarta: Gramedia & ISEAS. 279 Alatas, A. (2001b). The principal tenets of Indonesian foreign policy. In Alatas. A (Ed.), Voice for a just peace: A collection of speeches (pp. 1-10). Jakarta: Gramedia & ISEAS. Allan, P. (2006). Measuring international ethics: a moral scale of war, peace, justice, and global care. In Allan, P. & Keller, A. (Eds). What is a just peace? (pp 90-129). Oxford: Oxford University Press Almonte, J. T. (2000). ASEAN must speak with one voice on the South China Sea. Retrieved from http://csis.org/pacfor/pac0011.html Amer, R. (2002). Claims and conflict situations. In Kivimaki T. (Ed.), War or peace in the South China Sea? (pp. 24-40). Copenhagen: NIAS Press. Anwar, D. F. (1992). Indonesia in a changing regional and international environment. Indonesia Quarterly, 20(4), 376-94. Austin, G. (2003). Unwanted entanglement: The Philippines‟ Spratly Policy as a case study in conflict enhancement. Security Dialogue, 34, 41-54. doi: 10.1177/09670106030341005 Ball, D. & Taylor, B. (2006). Reflection on the track two process in the Asia- Pacific region. In Soesastro. H., Joewono. C., &.Hernandez, C. G. (Eds). Twenty two years of ASEAN-ISIS: Origin, evolution and challenges of track two diplomacy. (pp. 105-116). Jakarta: CSIS. Bautista, L. B. (2007). Thinking outside the box: the South China Sea issue and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea (Options, limitations and prospects). Philippine Law Journal, 81. 699-731. Bautista, L. B. (2011). Philippine territorial boundaries: internal tensions, colonial baggage, ambivalent conformity. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 16. 35-53. Bilder, R. B. (2003). An Overview of international dispute settlement. In In O‟Connel, M. E. (Ed.). International dispute settlement. (pp. 1-21). Burlington: Ashgate. Buszynski, L. (2003). ASEAN, the declaration on conduct and the South China Sea. Contemporary Southeast Asia. 25(3), 343-361. Buszynki, L. (2010). Rising Tensions in the South China Sea: Prospects for a resolution of the issue. Security Challenges, 6(2), 85-104. Chalk, P. (2002), Contemporary maritime piracy in Southeast Asia. In Baker, J. & Wiencek, D. (eds.). Cooperative monitoring in the South China Sea: Satellite imagery, confidence-building measures, and the Spratly Islands disputes, (pp. 165-185). London: Greenwood. 280 Chang, M. (2000). Exclusive Economic Zones. Retrieved from http://geography.about.com/library/misc/uceez.htm Checkel, J. T. (2008). Constructivism and foreign policy. In Smith. S., Hadfield, A., & Dunne, T., (Eds.). Foreign policy: theories, actors, cases. (pp. 71-82). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Chung, C. P. (1999). The Spratly and other South China Sea islands dispute. The Journal of Social, Political, and Economics Studies 24 (1), 17-36. Retrieved from http://www.jspes.org/spring1999.html Coleman, P. T. (2000). Intractable conflict. In Deutch, M. & Colemen, P. T. (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: theory and practice (pp. 428- 450). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Copeland, D. C. (2000). The constructivist challenge to structural realism. International Security. 25(2), 187-212. Cuhadar, E. (2009). Assessing transfer from track two diplomacy: The cases of water and Jerusalem. Journal of Peace Research, 46(5), 641-658. Demirdogen, U. D. (2011). A social-psychological approach to conflict resolution: Interactive problem solving. International Journal of Social Inquiry, 4(1), 215-227. Djalal, H. (1995a).The 1982 Law of the Sea Convention: A Southeast Asian perspective. Indonesian Quarterly, 13(1), 59-73. Djalal, H. (1995b). The development of the archipelagic state concept. In Djalal, H. (Ed.). Indonesia and the Law of the Sea, (pp. 334-43). Jakarta: Centre for Strategic and International Studies. Djalal, H. (1995c). Potential conflicts in the South China Sea: In search of cooperation. In Djalal, H. (Ed.). Indonesia and the Law of the Sea, (pp. 384-92). Jakarta: Centre for Strategic and International Studies. Djalal, H & Gault, I. T. (1999). Managing potential conflict in the South China Sea: informal diplomacy for conflict prevention. In C. A. Crocker, F. O. Hampson & P. Aall (Eds.), Herding cats: multiparty mediation in a complex world (pp. 107-133). Washington D. C.: United States Institute of Peace Press. Djalal, H. (2000). South China Sea island dispute. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, Supplement. 8, 9-21. Retrieved from http://rmbr.nus.edu.sg/rbz/supplement8.html Djiwandono, J. S. (1985). Forty years Indonesian foreign policy: Change and continuity. Indonesian Quarterly, 13(4), 441-51. 281 Dokker, K. (2001). Environment, security and regionalism in the Asia-Pacific: Is environment security a useful concept? The Pacific Review 14(4), 509-30. doi:10.1080/09512740110087311 Dosenrode, S. (2010). Federalism theory and neo-functionalism: elements for an analytical framework. Perspectives on Federalism. 2 (3), 1-28. Retrieved from http://www.on-federalism.eu/attachments/079_download.pdf Elleman, B. A. (2009). Maritime territorial dispute and their impact on maritime strategy: A historical Perspective. In Bateman, S. & Emmers, R. (eds.). Security and international politics in the South China Sea: Towards a cooperative management regime, (pp. 42-57). New York: Routledge. Fierke, K., M. (2007). Constructivisim. In Dunne, T., Kurki, M., & Smith, S., (Eds.). International relations theories: discipline and diversity. (pp. 171- 190). Oxford: Oxford University Press. Finnemore, M., & Sikkink, K. (1998). International norm dynamics and political change. International Organization. 52 (4), 887-917. Fisher, R. J. (2007). Assessing the contingency model of third-party intervention in successful cases of prenegotiation. Journal of Peace Research, 44(3), 311-329. Fletcher, H. (1994). The Archipelagic state and the full recognition of Indonesian national independence. Indonesian Quarterly, 22(2), 103-13. Folker, J. S. (2000). Competing paradigms or birds of a feather? Constructivism and Neoliberal Institutionalism Compared. International Studies Quarterly. 44, 97-119. Furtado, X. (1999). International law and the dispute over the Spratly Islands: Whither UNCLOS?. Contemporary of Southeast Asia 21(3), 386-404. Gault, I. T. (1998). Preventive diplomacy and pro-activity in the South China Sea. Contemporary Southeast Asia. 20(2), 171-190 Gault, I. T. (1999). Legal and political perspectives on sovereignty over the Spratly Islands. Retrieved from http://www.southchinasea.org/docs/Townsend-Gault.pdf Gawerc, M. I. (2006). Peace-building: Theoretical and concrete perspective. Peace & Change, 31(4), 435-478. Goldberg, R. (2013). Track two diplomacy in India and Pakistan: Initiatives, impact, challenges, and ways forward. PRIAD Policy Journal, 1(2), 1-16. Retrieved from http://www.priad.org/wpcontent/ uploads/2012/10/PRIAD_POLICYJOURNAL_Goldberg2.pdf 282 Guoxing, J. (2001). Rough waters in the South China Sea: Navigation issues and confidence-building measures. Asia Pacific Issues 53,1-8. Retrieved from http://www.eastwestcenter.org/sites/default/files/private/api053.pdf Harry, R. J. (2013). A solution acceptable to all? A legal analysis of the Senkaku- Diaoyu Island dispute. Cornell International Law Journal. 46, 653-682. Hassan, F. (1995). Indonesia foreign policy. The Indonesian Quarterly, 13(1), 39- 46. Hoesslin, K. V. (2005). A view of the South China Sea - from within: report on the Joint Oceanographic Marine Scientific Research Expedition (III) in the South China Sea. Culture Mandala: The Bulletin of the Centre for East- West Cultural and Economic Studies. 7(1), 1-5. Retrieved from http://epublications.bond.edu.au/cm/vol7/iss1/4 Holst, J. J. (1983). Confidence building measure: A conceptual framework. Survival. 25 (1), 2-15. Hongyu, P. K. (2003). The Chinese (broken) U-shaped line in the South China Sea: Points, lines and zone. Contemporary of Southeast Asia 25(3), 400- 415. Hopf, T. (1998). The promise of constructivism in international relations theory. International Security. 23(1), 171-200. Jian, S. (1997). Multinational oil companies and the Spratly dispute. Journal of Contemporary China 6(16), 951-601. doi:10.1080/10670569708724298 Job. B. L. (2003). Track 2 diplomacy: Ideational contribution to the evolving Asia security order. In Muthiah Alagappa (Ed.), Asian Security Order. (pp. 241- 279). Stanford: Stanford University Press Johnson, D. (1997). Drawn into the fray: Indonesia's Natuna Islands meet China's long gaze south Asian Affairs. Asian Affairs: An American Review, 24(3), 153-61. doi: 10.1080/00927679709602307 Johnston, A., I. (2003). Socialization in international institutions: The ASEAN way and international relations theory. In Ikenberry, G., J. & Mastanduno, M. (Eds.). International relations theory and the asia-pacific. (pp. 107-138). New York: Columbia University Press. Jones, P. (2008). Canada and track two diplomacy. Retrieved from http://dspace.africaportal.org/jspui/bitstream/123456789/23870/1/Canada% 20and%20track%20two%20diplomacy.pdf?1 Jones, S. (n. d.). What were the Oslo Accords? Retrieved from Steve Jones http://usforeignpolicy.about.com/od/middleeast/a/What-Were-The-Oslo- Accords.htm 283 Joyner, C. C. (1999). The Spratly islands dispute in the South China Sea: Problems, policies, and prospects for diplomatic accommodation. Retrieved from http://www.southchinasea.org/docs/Joyner,%20Spratly%20Islands%20Disp ute.pdf Kacowicz, A. M. & Tov, Y. B. S. (2000). Stable peace: A conceptual framework. In Kacowicz, A. M. et. al. (Eds.). Stable Peace among Nations, (pp. 11-35). Boston: Rowman & Littlefield. Katsumata, H. (2003). Reconstruction of diplomatic norms in Southeast Asia: The case for strict adherence to the „ASEAN Way‟. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 25(1), 104-121. Kelman, H. C. (2003). Interactive problem solving as a tool for second track diplomacy. In Davies. J. & Kaufman, E. (Eds.). Second tract/citizens' diplomacy: concepts and techniques for conflict transformation, (pp. 81- 106). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Kelman, H. C. (2005). Interactive problem solving in the Israeli-Palestinian case: Past contributions and present challenges. In Fisher, R. J. (Ed.). Paving the way: Contributions of interactive conflict resolution to peacemaking, (pp. 41-64). Lanham: Lexington Book. Keohane, R. O. (1988). International institutions: Two approaches. International Studies Quarterly. 32(4), 379-396. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2600589 Kraft, H. J. S. (2000). The autonomy dilemma of track two diplomacy in Southeast Asia. Security Dialogue, 31(3), 343-56. Kratochwil, F. (1996). Is th ship of culture at sea or returning? In Lapid, Y & Kratchowil, F. (Eds.). The Return of Culture and identity in IR theory, (pp. 201-222). Boulder: Lynne Rienner. Kurt, U. (2009). Europe of Monnet, Schumann and Mitrany: a historical glance to the EU from the functionalist perspective. European Journal of Economic and Political Studies. 2 (2), 41-60. Retrieved from http://ejeps.fatih.edu.tr/docs/articles/24.pdf Leifer, M. (1995b). Chinese economic reform and security policy: The South China Sea connection. Survival 37(4), 44-59. doi:10.1080/00396339508442789 Leong, A. K. (1998). Indonesian foreign policy: Change and continuity amidst a changing environment. Pointer, 24(2). Retrieved from http://www.mindef.gov.sg/safti/pointer/back/journals/1998/Vol24_2/2.htm 284 Maiese, M. (2003). Confidence building measures. In Burgess, G. & Burgess, H. (eds.) Beyond Intractability. Boulder: Conflict Research Consortium, University of Colorado. Retrieved from http://www.beyondintractability.org/bi-essay/confidence-building-measures Mak J. N. (2000). Domestic politics and conflict resolution in the South China Sea: China and the Sptatlys disputes, In Askadar. K. (Ed.), Kajian Malaysia: The Journal of Malaysian Studies XVIII(1-2), 87-119. Mapendere, J. (2005). Track one and a half diplomacy and the complementarity of tracks. Culture of Peace Online Journal. 2(1), 66-81. Retrieved from http://www.peacemaker.un.org/sites/peacemaker.un.org/files/TrackOneanda HalfDiplomacy_Mapendere.pdf Marlay, R. (1997). China, the Philippines and the Spratly Islands. Asian Affairs, 23(4). 195-210. McDonald, J. W. (2012). The institute for multi-track diplomacy. Journal of Conflictology, 3(2), 66-70. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.7238/joc.v3i2.1629 Metraux, D. A. (2013). The Senkaku Islands dispute between China and Japan. Southeast Review of Asian Studies. 35, 218-229. Ming, C. P. (1990). A new scramble for the South China Sea Islands. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 12(1), 20-39. Ming, L. J. & Dexia, L. (2003). The dotted line on the Chinese map of the South China Sea: A note. Ocean Development & International Law 34, 287–295. doi: 10.1080/0008320390221821 Mingjian, L. (2009). China‟s South China Sea dilemma: Balancing souveregnty, developmnt and security. . In Bateman, S. & Emmers, R. (eds.). Security and International Politics in the South China Sea: Towards a cooperative management regime, (pp. 140-153). New York: Routledge Mito, L. A. (1998). The Timor Gap treaty as a model for joint development in the Spratly Islands. American University International Law Review, 13 (3), 727- 764 Morton, B., & and Blackmore, G. (2001). South China Sea. Marine Pollution Bulletin 42(12), 1236-1263. doi. 10.1016/S0025-326X(01)00240-5. Naes, T. (2001). Environmental cooperation around the South China Sea: The experience of the South China Sea and the United Nations environmental program‟s strategic cction. The Pacific Review 14 (4), 553-573. doi: 10.1080/09512740110087339 Naes, T. (2002). Dangers to the environment. In Kivimaki, T. (ed.), War or peace in the South China Sea?,(pp. 43-53). Copenhagen: NIAS. 285 Naidoo, S. (2000). The role of track two diplomacy in the Democratic Republic of Congo conflict. African Journal on Conflict Resolution, 1 (2), 85-104. Retrieved from http://mercury.ethz.ch/serviceengine/Files/ISN/98710/ichaptersection_singl edocument/52a58dfa-c5ac-43ad-9326-c344b164e3c1/en/Chapter5.pdf Nan, S. A. (2003). What is track one diplomacy?. Retrieved from http://www.beyondintractability.org/essay/track1-diplomacy Ng, P. K. L., Ilahude, A. G., Sivasothi, N. & Yeo, D. C. Y. (2004). Expedition Anambas: An overview of the scientific marine exploration of the Anambas and Natuna Archipelago, 11-22 March 2002. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, supplement no 11, 1-17. Ng, P.K.L. & K.S. Tan. (2000). The state of marine biodiversity in the South China SEA. The Raffles Bulletin of Zoology, supplement no. 8, 3-7. Nguyen, D. M. (2006). Settlemennt of disputes under the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea: The case of the South China Sea dispute. University of Queensland Law Journal, 25(1), 145-180. http://www.law.uq.edu.au/previous-uqlj-editions#vol25numb1 Obydenkova, A. (2011). Comparative regionalism: Eurasian cooperation and European integration. The case for neofunctionalism?. Journal of Eurasian Studies. 2, 87-102. doi:10.1016/j.euras.2011.03.001 Odgaard, L. (2001, August). Deterrence and co-operation in the South China Sea. Contemporary Southeast Asia. 23 (2), 292-306. Osti, D. (2013, June). The historical background to the territorial dispute over the Senkaku/Daoyu islands. Analysis. 183, 1-9. Ozen, C. (1998). Neo-functionalism and the change in the dynamics of Turkey- EU relations. Perceptions Journal of International Affairs. 3 (3). Retrieved from http://sam.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/CinarOzen.pdf Pan, Z. (2007). Sino-Japanese dispute over Diaoyu/Senkaku islands: The pending controversy from the Chinese perspective. Journal of Chinese Political Science. 12(1), 71-88. Phillips, A. B. (2007). Constructivism. In Griffiths, M. (Ed.). International relations theory for the twenty-first century: An introduction. (pp. 60-74). New York: Routledge. Prayoga, T. & Arthana, I. W. (2009). Study on oceanographic and weather conditions related to the abundance of small pelagic fishery in Natuna Sea using remote sensing data. Ecotrophic, 4(1), 8-14. Prescott, V. (2010). Spratly Islands past and present. Mima Bulletin 17(1), 14-18. 286 Reus-Smith, C. (2005). Constructivism. In Burchill, S. et. al. (eds.). Theories of international relations. Third edition. (pp. 188-212). New York: Palgrave. Richardson, L;, & Pierre, E. A. S. (2005). Writing: A method of inquiry. In Denzin. N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). Qualitative research. (3rd ed.). London: Sage. Rosenberg. D. (1999). Environmental pollution around the South China Sea: Developing a regional response to a regional problem. Contemporary Southeast Asia 21(1), 119-145. Rosenberg. D. (2009). Fisheries management in the South China Sea. In Bateman, S & Emmers, R. (Eds.). Security and international politics in the South China Sea: Towards a cooperative management regime. (pp. 61-79). New York: Routledge. Rosenberg, D. (2010). Governing the South China Sea: from freedom of the seas to ocean enclosure movements. Harvard Asia Quarterly. 12(3&4), 4-12. Salameh, M. (1995). China, oil and the risk of regional conflict. Survival 37(4), 133-146. doi: 10.1080/00396339508442820 Schofield, C. (2009). Dangerous ground: a geopolitical overview of the South China Sea. In Bateman, S & Emmers, R. (Eds.). Security and international politics in the South China Sea: Towards a cooperative management regime. (pp. 7-25). New York: Routledge. Severino, R. C. (2010). ASEAN and the South China Sea. Security Challenges, 6(2), 37-47. Shen, J. (2002). China's sovereignty over the South China Sea islands: A historical perspective. Chinese Journal of International Law; 1(1), 94-157 Sivasothi, N. (2003). Progress report for EX ANAMBAS 2002, an initiative of the Workshop on Managing Potential Conflict in the South China Sea. Retrieved from rmbr.nus.edu.sg/exanambas/reports/ExAnambas%20Report- 17Sep2003.pdf Smith, C., R. (2005). Constructivism. In Burchill, S., et.al. (Eds.). Theories of international relations. Third edition. (pp. 188-212). New York: Palgrave, Smith, S. (2004). Singing our world into existence: IR theory and September 11. International Studies Quarterly. 48, 499-515. Soderbaum, F (2009). Comparative regional integration and regionalism. In T Landman & N. Robinson (Eds ), The SAGE Handbook of Comparative Politics. (pp. 477-497). London: SAGE publication. Song, Y. H. (2000). Codes of conduct in the South China Sea and Taiwan's stand. Marine Policy, 24, 449-459. 287 Steinberg, G. M. (2004). The centrality of confidence building measures: lessons from the Middle East. In Schnabel. A. & and Carment, D. (Eds.). Conflict revention: from rhetoric to reality. Volume 2. (pp. 258-85). Lanham: Lexington Book. Stone, D. (2011). The ASEAN-ISIS network: Interpretive communities, informal diplomacy and discourses of region. MINERVA 49(2), 241-262 Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11024-011-9171-5 Sukma, R. (1992). Indonesia and the South China Sea: Interests and policies. Indonesian Quarterly, 20(4), 395-404. Sukma, R. (1995). The evolution of Indonesia's foreign policy: An Indonesian view. Asian Survey, 35(3), 304-315. Sun. K. M. (1996). Freeze the tropical Seas: An ice-cool prescription for the burning Spratly issues! Marine Policy 20(1), 199-208. doi. 10.1016/0308- 597X(96)00010-3 Swanstrom, N. (1999). Conflict management and negotiations in the South China Sea: The ASEAN‟s way? (pp. 93-125). In Snilda, K. (ed.). Conflict management and negotiations in the South China Sea. Conference proceedings. Oslo: Uppsala University. Tanter, R. (1969). A working functionalism? A review. Conflict Resolution. 13 (3), 398-401. doi: 10.1177/002200276901300309 Taylor, I., & Williams, P., D. (2006). Introduction: Understanding South Africa‟s multilateralism. In Lee, D., Taylor, I., & Williams, P., D. (Eds.). The new multilateralism in South African diplomacy. (pp. 1-25). New York: Palgrave. Thao, N. H. (2009). The declaration on the conduct of parties in the South China Sea: A Vietnamese perspective, 2002-2007. In Bateman, S & Emmers, R. (Eds.). Security and international politics in the South China Sea: Towards a cooperative management regime. (pp. 207-221). New York: Routledge. Till, G. (2009). The South China Sea dispute: An international history. In Bateman, S & Emmers, R. (Eds.). Security and international politics in the South China Sea: Towards a cooperative management regime. (pp. 27-41). New York: Routledge. Tonnesson, S. (2000). China and the South China Sea: A Peace Proposal. Security Dialogues. 31(3): 307-326 Tonnesson, S. (2002a). The History of the dispute. In Kivimal, T. (ed.). War or peace in the South China Sea? (pp. 6-23). Copenhagen: NIAS. 288 Tonnesson, S. (2002b). The economic dimension: Natural resources and sea lanes. In Kivimaki , T. (ed.). War or peace in the South China Sea? (pp. 54-61). Copenhagen: NIAS. Tønnesson, S. (2002c) Why are the disputes in the South China Sea so Intractable? A historical approach. Asian Journal of Social Science. 30(3): 570–601. Trumbore, B. (2002). The Arab Oil Embargo of 1973-74. Retrieved from https://www.buyandhold.com/bh/en/education/history/2002/arab.html Wang, K. H. (2001). Bridge over trouble waters: Fisheries cooperation as a resolution to the South China Sea conflict. The Pacific Review 14(4), 531– 551. Weiner, A. (2003). Constructivism: The limits of bridging gaps. Journal of International Relations and Development. 6(3), 252-275. Weissmann, M. (2010). The South China Sea conflict and Sino-ASEAN relations: A study in conflict prevention and peace building. Asian Perspective. 34 (3), 35-69. Wendt, A. (1992). Anarchy is what states make of it: the social construction of power politics. International Organization. 46(2), 391-425. Wendt, A. (1995). Constructing international politics. International Security. 20(1), 71-81. Whiting, D. (1998). The Spratly Islands dispute and the law of the sea. Denver Journal of International Law and Policy 26(5), 897-915. Retrieved from http://djilp.org/volume-26/ Xiao, R. (2009). Between adapting and shaping: China‟s role in Asian regional cooperation. Journal of Contemporary China. 18(59), 303-320. Yu, J. L. N. (2001). The dispute over the Spratlys: Focus on Philippines-Japan Relations. Loyola School Review, 1, 47-66. Zulfqar, S. (2013). Efficacy of confidence building measures (cbms) in India- Pakistan relations. IPRI Journal, 13 (1), 106-116. Retrieved from http://www.ipripak.org/journal/winter%202013/std2.pdf Working Papers Banloi, R. C. (2001). A functionalist approach to the management of conflicts in the South China Sea: Option for China and ASEAN claimants. Paper presented at the Fourth China-ASEAN Research Institutes Roundtable at the University of Hong Kong. Hong Kong, October 18-20. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/1568097/A_Functionalist_Approach_in_the_Sout h_China_Sea_Disputes 289 Baviera, A. S. P. (2001, February). Bilateral confidence building with China in relation to the South China Sea dispute: A Philippine perspective. Working paper prepared for the International Security Research and Outreach Program International Security Bureau. Canada: Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade. Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/2467965/Bilateral_confidence_building_with_Ch ina_in_relation_to_the_South_China_Seas_dispute_A_Philippine_perspecti ve Chen, Z. (2011). The development of cross-strait relationship in a neofunctionalism framework. Working paper series on European studies Institute of European Studies Chinese Academy of Social Sciences. 5(3). Retrieved from http://ies.cass.cn/en/UploadFiles_8765/201111/2011113011322266.pdf Encomienda, A. A. (2012, December 6). Practice of joint cooperation/development in disputed waters: mixed success ventures thus far for the Philippines. Paper presented at the Symposium on Recent Developments in the South China Sea Disputes and Prospects of Joint Development Regime. Haikou-China. Retrieved from http://www.nanhai.org.cn/include_lc/upload/UploadFiles/201313016215273 502.pdf Guzzini, S. (2003). Constructivism and the role of institutions in international relations. Research paper retrieved from http://hamdoucheriad.yolasite.com/resources/constructivisme%20and%20th e%20role%20of%20institutions%20in%20international%20relations.pdf Kaye, D. D. (2005). Rethinking track two diplomacy: the Middle East and South Asia. Clingendael Diplomacy Paper no. 3. The Hague: Netherlands Institute of International Relations. Retrieved from http://www.peacepalacelibrary.nl/ebooks/files/315572531.pdf Khemakorn, P. (2006, November). Sustainable management of pelagic fisheries in the South China Sea region. Working Paper United Nations - Nippon Foundation, New York. Retrieved from http://www.un.org/depts/los/nippon/unnff_programme_home/fellows_pages /fellows_papers/khemakorn_0607_thailand.pdf Luhulima, C. P. F. (1999, September 28). Confidence building measures and preventive diplomacy in Southeast Asia. (Working paper). Department of Foreign Affairs Republic of Indonesia. Muhibat, S. F. (n. d.). Indonesia‟s maritime security: Ongoing problems and strategic implications. Working paper of the Centre for Strategic and International Studies. Retrieved from http://csis.or.id/sites/default/files/atch/Indonesias%20Maritime%20Security %20Ongoing%20Problems%20and%20Strategic%20Implications.pdf 290 Poole, A., D., H. (2006, August 31 – September 3). Cooperation in contention: the evolution of ASEAN norms. Presentation paper at Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia. Retrieved from http://yciss.info.yorku.ca/files/2012/06/WP44-Poole.pdf Swanström , N. L. P. & Weissman, M. S. (2005). Conflict, conflict prevention, conflict management and beyond: A conceptual exploration. Concept paper of Central Asia-Caucasus Institute & Silk Road Studies Program. Retrieved from http://www.silkroadstudies.org/new/docs/ConceptPapers/2005/concept_pap er_ConfPrev.pdf Thuy, T. T. (2009, November 26-27). Compromise and cooperation on the sea: the case of signing the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea. Paper presented at the First International Workshop on the South China Sea, organized by Diplomatic Academy of Vietnam and Vietnam Lawyer‟s Association, Hanoi. Retrieved from http://nghiencuubiendong.vn/download/doc_download/103-dr-tran-truongthuy- compromise-and-cooperation-on-the-sea-the-case-of-signing-thedeclaration Trost, H. R. (1990). The Spratly Islands: A study on the limitations of international law. Occasional paper No. 14. Centre of Southeast Asia Studies. University of Kent Centebury. Yaniv, L. (2013). People-to-people peace making: The role of citizen diplomacy in the Israeli- Palestinian conflict. Research paper The University of Southern California. Retrieved from http://uscpublicdiplomacy.org/training/best-student-paper-2013-cpd-paperprize Yomo, K. S. & Rock, M. (1998, June). The second-tier Southeast Asian newly industrializing countries. Discussion paper on United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Geneva. Retrieved from http://unctad.org/en/docs/dp_136.en.pdf Unpublished Theses Aguilar, A. C. J. (2008). Track 2 diplomacy and the ASEAN peace: The role of experts in the development towards a security community – a case study on ASEAN-ISIS. (Master thesis University of Oslo). Retrieved from http://urn.nb.no/URN:NBN:no-19244 Buntoro, K. (2010). An analysis of legal issues relating to navigational rights and freedoms through and over Indonesian waters. (PhD. dissertation, University of Wollongong). Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4091&context=theses 291 Chin, Y. C. (2003). Potential for conflict in the Spratly Islands. (Master thesis, Naval Postgraduate School). Retrievd from http://www.ccc.nps.navy.mil/research/theses/Chin03.pdf Chung. C. (2000). The Spratly islands dispute: Decision units and domestic politics. (PhD. dissertation, University of New South Wales). Retrieved from http://unsworks.unsw.edu.au/fapi/datastream/unsworks:3198/SOURCE01 Hauger, T. J. D. (2011). Stalemate in the Holy Land: A Critical examination of Palestinian-Israeli interreligious initiatives as track-II diplomacy. (Master thesis of peace and conflict dtudies, University of Oslo), Retrieved from https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/13123/Hauger_Thesis_Co mplete_May_2011.pdf?sequence=1 Hein, G. (1986). Soeharto‟s foreign policy: Second generation nationalism in Indonesia. (PhD. dissertation, University of California Berkeley). (UMI no. 8718007) Hoyt, M. A. (1994). Sino-Vietnamese interests collide in the South China Sea: A case study of the dispute Paracel and Spratly archipelagos. (Master thesis, University of Hawaii). (UMI no. 1357809). Kao, S. M. (2011). Assessing regional cooperation among all parties as an alternative to sovereignty dispute in the South China Sea. (PhD. dissertation, University of Delaware). (UMI no. 3498556). Morton, D. R. (2007). Becoming a good neighbor in Southeast Asia: The case of China‟s territorial dispute in the South China Sea, 1998-2006. (PhD. dissertation, Old Dominion University). (UMI No. 3282546) Naes, T. (1999). Environment and security in the South China Sea region: the role of experts, non-governmental actors and governments in regime building process. (Master thesis, University of Oslo). Retrieved from http://www.prio.no/upload/MCA/Publications/pdfformat/ Hovedoppgave_TNaess.pdf Nicholson, B. J. (2006). From the dragon‟s claw to the panda‟s paw: The socialization of China in the ASEAN Regional Forum. (Master thesis, Dalhousie University). Retrieved from http://www.worldcat.org/title/fromthe- dragons-claw-to-the-pandas-paw-the-socialization-of-china-in-theasean- regional-forum/oclc/228434162?referer=tag_list_view Snidal, K. (2000). Petroleum in the South China Sea: a Chinese national interest. (Master thesis, University of Oslo). Retrieved from http://www.sum.uio.no/southchinasea/beyond/Snildalthesis.pdf Stinnett, S. L. (2000)). The Spratly island dispute: An analysis. (Master thesis, Florida Atlantic University). (UMI no. 1401501). 292 Ulusoy, H. (2005). A constructivist analysis of Turkey‟s foreign and security policy in the Post Cold War Era. (PhD. dissertation, Middle East Technical University). Retrieved from http://etd.lib.metu.edu.tr/upload/12606664/index.pdf Utarti, H. M. (2000). The „wise eagle‟?: Indonesia‟s foreign policy and the politics of national identity. (PhD. dissertation, University of Hawaii). (UMI no. 9968060). Periodicals Chanda, N. (1992, August 13). South China Sea: Treacherous shoals. Far Eastern Economic Review. China takes to the sea. (1995, April 29). Economist. China testing the water. (1992, March 18). Far Eastern Economic Reiview. Ching, F. (1999, April 8). Manila foiled in Spratly row. Far Eastern Economic Review. Cooling off a flashpoint. (1992, July 17). Asiaweek. Goldstein, C. (1993, April 22). Inonesia trade & investment: Oil-Natuna‟s riches. Far Eastern Economic Review. Hamzah, B. A. (1992, August 13). China‟s strategy. Far Eastern Economic Review. McBeth, J. (1995, April 27). Oil-rich diet. Far Eastern Economic Review. McBeth, J. (1996, September 19). Exercising sovereignty: Indonesia sends a message from Natuna. Far Eastern Economic Review. Schwarz, A. (1992, August 6). Gas pressure: Indonesia, Esso feel heat over new field. Far Eastern Economic Review. South China Sea: Treacherous shoals. (1992, August 13). Far Eastern Economic Review. Tasker, R. (1992, August 6). ASEAN facing up to security. Far Eastern Economic Review. Tasker, R. (1995, April 6). A line in the sand. Far Eastern Economic Review. Vatikiokis, M. (1991, January 10). Indonesia proposed talks on South China Sea: Maritime hegemony. Far Eastern Economic Review. 293 Maps Ilustrative Map of Indonesian Water under Ordonatie. Buntoro, K. (2010). An analysis of legal issues relating to navigational rights and freedoms through and over Indonesian waters. (PhD. dissertation, University of Wollongong). Retrieved from http://ro.uow.edu.au/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=4091&context=theses Illustrative Map of Overlapping Claim between China and Indonesia‟s EEZ. Rosenberg, D. (2010). Governing the South China Sea: from freedom of the seas to ocean enclosure movements. Harvard Asia Quarterly. 12(3&4), 4- 12. Illustrative Map of Overlapping Claim in the South China Sea. NBC News. (2012, August 24). Much at stake for US as tensions rise in troubled China Seas. Retrieved from http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_news/2012/08/24/13432841-much-atstake- for-us-as-tensions-rise-in-troubled-china-seas?lite Map of Brunei‟s Claim in the South China Sea. Haller-Trost, R. (1994). The Brunei-Malaysia Dispute over Territorial and Maritime Claims in International Law. International Boundaries Research Unit, Department of Geography, University of Durham, 1(3), p. 55. Map of China‟s Claim in the South China Sea. The Attachment of Note Verbale Permanent Mission of People‟s Republic of China to the United Nations. (2009, May 7). Retrieved from http://nghiencuubiendong.vn/en/datbase-on-south-china-seastudy/ doc_download/52-chinese-note-verbale-cml182009-to-the-unitednations Map of East Malaysia. Institut Tanah dan Ukur Negara. (2009, February 4). Penandaan dan Pengukuran Sempadan. Retrieved from http://pintu.instun.gov.my/images/ukur/artikel/Pengukuran%20Semp_%20N egeri%20%20A-bangsa.pdf Map of Indonesia‟s Sea-lanes. International Maritime Organization. (2003, July 3). Adoption, designation and substitution of archipelagic sea lanes. Retrieved from http://www.imo.org/blast/blastDataHelper.asp?data_id=7620&filename=20 0-add.1.pdf Map of Indonesia‟s Territory under UNCLOS. Bakosurtanal. (2013). Peta Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia Map of Natuna Islands and its EEZ. Bakosurtanal. (2013). Peta Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia 294 Map of Southeast Asia University of Texas Libraries, n. d. Southeast Asia map. Retrieved from http://www.lib.utexas.edu/maps/middle_east_and_asia/southeast_asia_pol_2 003.jpg Map of the Philippines‟ Claim in the South China Sea. Bautista, L. B. (2011). Philippine territorial boundaries: internal tensions, colonial baggage, ambivalent conformity. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies. 16, p. 40. Map of the Sea Lanes of the South China Sea. Energy Daily. (2011, July 23). China hungry for South China Sea oil: Philippines. Retrieved from http://www.energydaily. com/reports/China_hungry_for_South_China_Sea_oil_Philippines_99 9.html Map of the South China Sea. The South China Sea Online Resource. (2011). The South China Sea Islands. Retrieved from http://www.southchinasea.org/files/2011/08/schina_sea_88.jpg Map of Timor Gap. Parliament of Australia. (1999). The Timor Gap (Zone of Co-operation) Treaty. Retrieved from http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Foreign _Affairs_Defence_and_Trade/Completed%20inquiries/1999- 02/east_timor/report/c04 Map of U-Shaped Lines of the South China Sea. Tonnesson, S. (2000). China and the South China Sea: A Peace Proposal. Security Dialogues. 31(3), p. 310. Map of Vietnam‟s Claim in the South China Sea. Socialist Republic of Vietnam. (2009, April). Submission to the Commission on the Limits of the Continental Shelf: Pursuant to Article 76, Paragraph 8 of the United Nations Convention on the law of the Sea 1982. Map of West Malaysia. Institut Tanah dan Ukur Negara. (2009, February 4). Penandaan dan Pengukuran Sempadan. Retrieved from http://pintu.instun.gov.my/images/ukur/artikel/Pengukuran%20Semp_%20N egeri%20%20A-bangsa.pdf Websites Code of Conduct. (n. d.). Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Code_of_conduct 295 Economy of Indonesia. (n. d.). Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Economy_of_Indonesia#Hydrocarbons List of United Nations peacekeeping missions. (n. d.).. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_United_Nations_peacekeeping_missio ns

Similar Items