Conceptual design and development model of assistive courseware for young low vision learners (AC4LV)

The focus of this study relates to technology (hardware and software) that is purposely designed for people with disabilities (PWDs), which is called Assistive Technology (AT). Previous findings reveal that studies related to educational content in courseware is highly lacking, particularly for low...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Nurulnadwan, Aziz
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2015
Subjects:	T58.6-58.62 Management information systems
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/5796/1/s94049_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/5796/2/s94049_02.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.5796
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Abdul Mutalib, Ariffin Sarif, Siti Mahfuzah
topic	T58.6-58.62 Management information systems
spellingShingle	T58.6-58.62 Management information systems Nurulnadwan, Aziz Conceptual design and development model of assistive courseware for young low vision learners (AC4LV)
description	The focus of this study relates to technology (hardware and software) that is purposely designed for people with disabilities (PWDs), which is called Assistive Technology (AT). Previous findings reveal that studies related to educational content in courseware is highly lacking, particularly for low vision learners. Also, many existing conceptual design models of courseware lack of specific requirements and empirical evidences to cater the needs of low vision learners. Preliminary studies have proven that available content applications fail to cater the needs of low vision learners in terms of information accessibility, navigationability, and pleasurability. Hence, this study proposes a conceptual design model of courseware for low vision learners, named as Assistive Courseware for Low Vision (AC4LV). Four (4) specific objectives are formulated. The Design Science Research Methodology has been adopted. Eight (8) components of Conceptual Design Model of AC4LV have been constructed and integrated: structural, content composition, AC4LV element, learning theories, learning approaches, development process, instructional design model, and technology. The proposed model has been reviewed by 12 experts and validated through prototyping. It was found that the proposed model has been well-accepted by local and international experts. Prototyping has implicated that the model is useful to follow by novice and non-technical developers. On top of that, the findings of user experience testing indicate that the AC4LV is able to fulfill the needs of the low vision learners in terms of information accessibility, navigationability, and pleasurability. All these findings demonstrate that the Conceptual Design Model of AC4LV exhibits useful development for content application as well as providing theoretical and practical contributions of the study.This study provides guidelines for developing educational content in courseware that caters the need of low vision learners so that this particular group of PWDs may gain equal opportunities of learning.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Ph.D.
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Nurulnadwan, Aziz
author_facet	Nurulnadwan, Aziz
author_sort	Nurulnadwan, Aziz
title	Conceptual design and development model of assistive courseware for young low vision learners (AC4LV)
title_short	Conceptual design and development model of assistive courseware for young low vision learners (AC4LV)
title_full	Conceptual design and development model of assistive courseware for young low vision learners (AC4LV)
title_fullStr	Conceptual design and development model of assistive courseware for young low vision learners (AC4LV)
title_full_unstemmed	Conceptual design and development model of assistive courseware for young low vision learners (AC4LV)
title_sort	conceptual design and development model of assistive courseware for young low vision learners (ac4lv)
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
publishDate	2015
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/5796/1/s94049_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/5796/2/s94049_02.pdf
_version_	1747827983662448640
spelling	my-uum-etd.57962021-04-04T08:54:29Z Conceptual design and development model of assistive courseware for young low vision learners (AC4LV) 2015 Nurulnadwan, Aziz Abdul Mutalib, Ariffin Sarif, Siti Mahfuzah Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences T58.6-58.62 Management information systems The focus of this study relates to technology (hardware and software) that is purposely designed for people with disabilities (PWDs), which is called Assistive Technology (AT). Previous findings reveal that studies related to educational content in courseware is highly lacking, particularly for low vision learners. Also, many existing conceptual design models of courseware lack of specific requirements and empirical evidences to cater the needs of low vision learners. Preliminary studies have proven that available content applications fail to cater the needs of low vision learners in terms of information accessibility, navigationability, and pleasurability. Hence, this study proposes a conceptual design model of courseware for low vision learners, named as Assistive Courseware for Low Vision (AC4LV). Four (4) specific objectives are formulated. The Design Science Research Methodology has been adopted. Eight (8) components of Conceptual Design Model of AC4LV have been constructed and integrated: structural, content composition, AC4LV element, learning theories, learning approaches, development process, instructional design model, and technology. The proposed model has been reviewed by 12 experts and validated through prototyping. It was found that the proposed model has been well-accepted by local and international experts. Prototyping has implicated that the model is useful to follow by novice and non-technical developers. On top of that, the findings of user experience testing indicate that the AC4LV is able to fulfill the needs of the low vision learners in terms of information accessibility, navigationability, and pleasurability. All these findings demonstrate that the Conceptual Design Model of AC4LV exhibits useful development for content application as well as providing theoretical and practical contributions of the study.This study provides guidelines for developing educational content in courseware that caters the need of low vision learners so that this particular group of PWDs may gain equal opportunities of learning. 2015 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/5796/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/5796/1/s94049_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/5796/2/s94049_02.pdf text eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Abdul Nasir, Z., Syamila Zakiah, A. W., Juliana Aida, A. B., Adzira, H., & Abdul Aziz, A. N. (2011). Interactive multimedia-based learning for Network Cable Installation course. 2011 International Conference on User Science and Engineering (i-USEr ), 157–162. doi:10.1109/iUSEr.2011.6150556 Abtahi, M. S. (2012). Interactive multimedia learning object (IMLO) for dyslexic children. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 1206–1210. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.801 Adnan, A. B. (2012). Factors of unemployment - Is disability a factor? SOCSO Return to Work Conference 2012- Transforming the Social Landscape, 1–14. Retrieved from http://www.rtwmalaysia.com/2012/images/stories/ presentation2012/En._Adnan_B_Abu_Bakar.pdf Alethea, B. (2009). Applications of high and low fidelity prototypes in researching intuitive interaction. Undisciplined! Design Research Society Conference, 1–17. Retrieved from http://shura.shu.ac.uk/458/1/fulltext.pdf Alghadyan, A. A. (2011). Diabetic retinopathy – An update. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology, 25(2), 99–111. doi:10.1016/j.sjopt.2011.01.009 Alhajj, T., Wang, L., Wheeler, K., Zhao, W., Sun, Y., Stallones, L., & Xiang, H. (2010). Prevalence of disability among adolescents and adults in rural China. Disability and Health Journal, 3(4), 282–288. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2010.01.002 Allday, R. A., Duhon, G. J., Blackburn-Ellis, S., & Van Dycke, J. L. (2010). The biasing effects of labels on direct observation by preservice teachers. Teacher Education and Special Education: The Journal of the Teacher Education Division of the Council for Exceptional Children, 34(1), 52–58. doi:10.1177/0888406410380422 Allen, D. E., Donham, R. S., & Bernhardt, S. A. (2011). Problem-based learning. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, (128), 21–30. doi:10.1002/tl.465 Al-Rowaily, M. A. (2010). Prevalence of refractive errors among pre-school children at King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Saudi Journal of Ophthalmology, 24(2), 45–48. doi:10.1016/j.sjopt.2010.01.001 Altrichter, H., Posch, P., & Somekh, B. (2008). Teachers investigate their work. London and New York: Routledge. American Department of Justice. (2010). Nondiscrimination on the basis of disability in state and local government services. Federal Register, 75(178), 1–74. Retrieved from http://www.ada.gov/regs2010/titleII_2010/titleII_ 2010_fr.pdf Ammenwerth, E., Iller, C., & Mansmann, U. (2003). Can evaluation studies benefit from triangulation? A case study. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 70(2-3), 237–248. doi:10.1016/S1386-5056(03)00059-5 Andharini, D.C., & Ari, B. (2012). Personalized learning path of a web-based learning system. International Journal of Computer Applications, 53(7), 17–22. doi:10.5120/8434-2206 Andreou, Y., & McCall, S. (2010). Using the voice of the child who is blind as a tool for exploring spatial perception. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 28(2), 113–129. doi:10.1177/0264619609360285 Applasamy, V., Gamboa, R. A., Al-Atabi, M., & Namasivayam, S. (2014). Measuring happiness in academic environment: A case study of the School of Engineering at Taylor’s University (Malaysia). Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 106–112. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1403 Apple Incorporated. (2013). Apple’s commitment to accessibility. Retrieved from http://www.apple.com/accessibility/ Ariffin, A. M. (2009). Conceptual design of reality learning media (RLM) model based on entertaining and fun constructs. (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 2009). Retrieved from http://etd.uum.edu.my/1521/ Auster, E. R. (2006). Creating active learning in the classroom: A systematic approach. Journal of Management Education, 30(2), 333–353. doi:10.1177/1052562905283346 Azizinezhad, M., & Hashemi, M. (2011). Humour: A pedagogical tool for language learners. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 2093–2098. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.407 Bakır, S. (2011). Is it possible to have students think creatively with the help of active learning techniques? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15, 2533–2539. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.04.140 Baneke, A. (2012). Review: Targeting trachoma: Strategies to reduce the leading infectious cause of blindness. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease, 10(2), 92–96. doi:10.1016/j.tmaid.2012.01.005 Bart, O., Jarus, T., Erez, Y., & Rosenberg, L. (2011). How do young children with DCD participate and enjoy daily activities? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(4), 1317–1322. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.039 Bashir, M., Afzal, M. T., & Azeem, M. (2008). Reliability and validity of qualitative and operational research paradigm. Pakistan Journal of Statistics and Operational Research, 4(1), 35–45. Retrieved from http://www.pjsor.com/index.php/pjsor/article/ viewFile/59/38scientific Battaglia, M. P. (2011). Nonprobability sampling. In Encyclopedia of Survey Research Methods. SAGE Publications Ltd. Bendová, P., Čecháčková, M., & Šádková, L. (2014). Inclusive education of preschool children with special educational needs in kindergartens. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 112, 1014–1021. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1263 Bernd, T., Van Der Pijl, D., & De Witte, L. P. (2009). Existing models and instruments for the selection of assistive technology in rehabilitation practice. Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy, 16(3), 146–158. doi:10.1080/11038120802449362 Bertoni, A. (2013). Analyzing product-service systems conceptual design: The effect of color-coded 3D representation. Design Studies. doi:10.1016/j.destud.2013.02.003 Beverley, C. A., Bath, P. A., & Barber, R. (2011). Health and social care information for visually-impaired people. Aslib Proceedings, 63(2), 256–274. doi:10.1108/00012531111135691 Bloom, B. S. (1981). All our children learning (Vol. 3). New York: McGraw-Hill. Bocconi, S., Dini, S., Ferlino, L., & Martinoli, C. (2007). ICT educational tools and visually impaired students: Different answers to different accessibility needs. In C. Stephanidis (Ed.), Universal Access in Human-Computer Interaction. Applications and Services (pp. 491–500). Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-73283-9_55 Bodemer, D., Ploetzner, R., Feuerlein, I., & Spada, H. (2004). The active integration of information during learning with dynamic and interactive visualisations. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 325–341. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.006 Boeije, H. R. (2010). Analysis in qualitative research. Washington, D.C.: SAGE Publications Ltd. 365 Boghossian, P. (2006). Behaviorism, constructivism, and socratic pedagogy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(6), 713–722. doi:10.1111/j.1469- 5812.2006.00226.x. Bolonkin, A. (2012). 7- Human emotions, happiness, and pleasure. Universe, Human Immortality and Future Human Evaluation, 53–57. doi:10.1016/B978-0-12- 415801-6.00007-4 Bonwell, C.C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom (Report No. ED340272). Retrieved from http://www.oid.ucla.edu/about/units/tatp/old/lounge/pedagogy/downloads/activ e-learning-eric.pdf Borg, J., Larsson, S., Östergren, P., Rahman, A. S. M. A., Bari, N., & Khan, A. H. M. N. (2012). User involvement in service delivery predicts outcomes of assistive technology use : A cross-sectional study in Bangladesh. BMC Health Sevices Research, 12(1), 330–339. doi:10.1186/1472-6963-12-330 Bowen, G. A. (2008). Naturalistic inquiry and the saturation concept: A research note. Qualitative Research, 8(1), 137–152. doi:10.1177/1468794107085301 Brault, M. W. (2011). School-aged children with disabilities in U.S. metropolitan statistical areas : 2010. United State Census Bureau, 1401, 1–8. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/prod/2011pubs/acsbr10-12.pdf Brault, M. W. (2012). Americans with disabilities: 2010. Household economics studies. United State Census Bureau, 1–24. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/prod/2012pubs/p70-131.pdf Breau, L. M., & Camfield, C. S. (2011). Pain disrupts sleep in children and youth with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(6), 2829–2840. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.05.023 Bretz, R., & Johnson, L. (2000). An innovative pedagogy for teaching and evaluating computer literacy. Information Technology and Management, 1(4), 283–292. doi:10.1023/A:1019185311206 Brucker, B., Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2014). Learning with dynamic and static visualizations: Realistic details only benefit learners with high visuospatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 36, 330–339. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2014.03.077 Bult, M. K., Verschuren, O., Jongmans, M. J., Lindeman, E., & Ketelaar, M. (2011). What influences participation in leisure activities of children and youth with physical disabilities? A systematic review. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(5), 1521–1529. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.045 366 Burla, L., Knierim, B., Barth, J., Liewald, K., Duetz, M., & Abel, T. (2014). From text to codings: Intercoder reliability assessment in qualitative content analysis. Nursing Research, 57(2), 113–7. doi:10.1097/01.NNR.0000313482.33917.7d Bushro, A., & Halimah, B. Z. (2008). Multimedia mathematics courseware based on the multiple intelligences model (MI-MathS). 2008 International Symposium on Information Technology, 1–5. doi:10.1109/ITSIM.2008.4631736 Büyükduman, İ., & Şirin, S. (2010). Learning portfolio (LP) to enhance constructivism and student autonomy. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 3, 55–61. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.012 Campbell, J. L., Quincy, C., Osserman, J., & Pedersen, O. K. (2013). Coding indepth semistructured interviews: Problems of unitization and intercoder reliability and agreement. Sociological Methods & Research, 42(3), 294–320. doi:10.1177/0049124113500475 Cann, A., & Matson, C. (2014). Sense of humor and social desirability: Understanding how humor styles are perceived. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 176–180. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.029 Carlson, K.A., & Winquist, J. R. (2011). Evaluating an active learning approach to teaching introductory statistics : A classroom workbook approach. Journal of Statistics Education, 19(1), 1–23. Retrieved from www.amstat.org/publications/jse/v19n1/carlson.pdf Caroll, J. B. (1989). The Carroll model: A 25-year retrospective and prospective view. Educational Researcher, 18(1), 26–31. Retrieved from http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal Chang, T., Kaasinen, E., & Kaipainen, K. (2013). Persuasive design in mobile applications for mental well-being : Multidisciplinary expert review. In B. Godara & K. S. Nikita (Eds.), Wireless Mobile of Communication and Healthcare: Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering (pp. 154–162). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-37893-5_18 Chang, Y., & Chen, C. (2011). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of English learning using augmented reality. 2011 IEEE International Conference on Multimedia and Expo, 1–6. doi:10.1109/ICME.2011.6012177 Chen, C.-M., & Wang, H.-P. (2011). Using emotion recognition technology to assess the effects of different multimedia materials on learning emotion and performance. Library & Information Science Research, 33(3), 244–255. doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2010.09.010 367 Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1999). Developement and adaptations of the seven principles for good practice in undergraduate education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 80, 75–81. doi:10.1016/0307-4412(89)90094-0 Cho, V., Cheng, T. C. E., & Lai, W. M. J. (2009). The role of perceived userinterface design in continued usage intention of self-paced e-learning tools. Computers & Education, 53(2), 216–227. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.01.014 Churchill, D. (2007). Towards a useful classification of learning objects. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(5), 479–497. Retrieved from http://daniel.cite.hku.hk/lo/Papers/Classification.pdf Churchill, D. (2011). Conceptual model learning objects and design recommendations for small screens key concepts and issues. Educational Technology and Society, 14(1), 203–216. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/journals/14_1/18.pdf Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Keith, M. (2011). Research methods in education. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group NY. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. London and New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group. Cook, A.M., & Polgar, J. M. (2007). Cook and Hussey’s assistive technologies: Principles and practice. St Louis, Mo.: Mosby Elsevier. Cooper, J., Lewis, R., & Urquhart, C. (2004). Using participant or non-participant observation to determine information behaviour. Information Research, 9(4), 1– 15. doi:10.1.1.102.4939 Cooperstein, S. E., & Kocevar-Weidinger, E. (2004). Beyond active learning: a constructivist approach to learning. Reference Services Review, 32(2), 141–148. doi:10.1108/00907320410537658 Copolillo, A., & Ivanoff, S. D. (2011). Assistive technology and home modification for people with neurovisual deficits. NeuroRehabilitation, 28(3), 211–20. doi:10.3233/NRE-2011-0650 Corbin, J., & Morse, J. M. (2003). The unstructured interactive interview: Issues of reciprocity and risks when dealing with sensitive topics. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(3), 335–354. doi:10.1177/1077800403251757 Cross, D. R. (2007). Observational methods. Child Psychology, 1–12. Retrieved from http://www.davidcross.us/classes/child/ObservationalMethods.pdf 368 Dalgarno, B. (2001). Technologies supporting highly interactive learning resources on the Web: An analysis. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 12(2), 153– 171. Retrieved from http://www.editlib.org/p/8417 Davis, A. M. (1992). Operational prototyping: A new development approach. Software IEEE, 9(5), 70–78. doi:10.1109/52.156899 Dawe, M. (2006). Desperately seeking simplicity : How young adults with cognitive disabilities and their families adopt assistive technologies. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1143–1152. doi:10.1145/1124772.1124943 Demissie, B. S., & Solomon, A. W. (2011). Magnitude and causes of childhood blindness and severe visual impairment in Sekoru District, Southwest Ethiopia: A survey using the key informant method. Transactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 105(9), 507–11. doi:10.1016/j.trstmh.2011.04.007 Díaz-Bossini, J. M., & Moreno, L. (2014). Accessibility to mobile interfaces for older people. Procedia Computer Science, 27(2014), 57–66. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2014.02.008 Dicicco-Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical Education, 40(4), 314–321. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2929.2006.02418.x Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (1996). The systematic design of instruction (4th Ed.). New York, NY: Harper Collin. Dick, W., & Carey, L. (2004). The systematic design of instruction. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Diepen, N. M. Van, Stefanova, E., & Miranowicz, M. (2009). Mastering skills using ICT : An active learning approach. Research, Reflections, and Innovations in Integrating ICT in Education, 1, 226–233. Retrieved from http://www.pdst.ie/sites/default/files/Active learning ICT.pdf Din, R., Norman, H., Kamarulzaman, M. F., Shah, P. M., Karim, A., Mat Salleh, N. S., … Mastor, K. A. (2012). Creation of a knowledge society via the use of mobile blog: A model of integrated meaningful hybrid e-training. Asian Social Science, 8(16), 45–56. doi:10.5539/ass.v8n16p45 Docherty, S., & Sandelowski, M. (1999). Focus on qualitative methods: Interviewing children. Research in Nursing & Health, 22(2), 177–185. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-240X(199904)22:2<177::AID-NUR9>3.3.CO;2-8 369 Domagk, S., Schwartz, R. N., & Plass, J. L. (2010). Interactivity in multimedia learning: An integrated model. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(5), 1024– 1033. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.003 Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., de-Marcos, L., Fernández-Sanz, L., Pagés, C., & Martínez-Herráiz, J.J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380–392. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.020 Dove, M. K. (2012). Advancements in assístíve technology and AT laws for the disabled. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin Summer 2012, 78(4), 23–29. doi:10.107/S1355617711001548 Driscoll, L. (2011). Introduction to primary research: Observations, surveys, and interviews. In P. Lowe, C. & Zemliansky (Ed.), Writing Spaces: Readings on Writting (Vol. 2, pp. 153–174). United States of America: Parlor Press. Dube, W.B., Ahearn, W.H., Lionello-DeNolf, K., & McIlvane, W. J. (2009). Behavioral momentum: Translational research in intellectual and developmental disabilities. The Behavior Analyst Today, 10(2), 238–254. Retrieved from http://ehis.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=7&sid=79ad4538- b3ae-4724-bf99-b2828e20ecab%40sessionmgr12&hid=2 Dulfer, M. N., Polesel, J., & Rice, S. (2012). The experience of education: The impacts of high stakes testing on school students and their families an educator’s perspective. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne. Dunlosky, J., & Thiede, K. W. (1998). What makes people study more? An evaluation of factors that affect self-paced study. Acta Psychologica, 98(1), 37– 56. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9581124 Dursin, A. G. (2012). Information design and education for visually impaired and blind people. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 5568–5572. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.477 Dwolatzky, B., Kennedy, I. G., & Owens, J. D. (2002). Modern software engineering methods for developing courseware. Engineering Education 2002:Professionals Engineering Scenarios. doi:10.1049/ic:20020113 Efendioğlu, A. (2012). Courseware development model (CDM): The effects of CDM on primary school pre-service teachers’ achievements and attitudes. Computers & Education, 59(2), 687–700. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.03.015 370 Elenchothy, D., Rohani, A.T., Mokhtar, N., & Aminuddin, H. (2010). Enhancing algebraic conceptual knowledge with aid of module using mastery learning approach. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 362–369. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.051 Ellis, K. (2009). Multimedia for primary school children learning sign language. Proceedings of the 21st Annual Conference of the Australian Computer-Human Interaction. doi:10.1145/1738826.1738843 Esteban-Millat, I., Martínez-López, F. J., Huertas-García, R., Meseguer, A., & Rodríguez-Ardura, I. (2014). Modelling students’ flow experiences in an online learning environment. Computers & Education, 71, 111–123. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.012 Eugène, C. (2006). How to teach at the university level through an active learning approach? Consequences for teaching basic electrical measurements. Measurement, 39(10), 936–946. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2006.09.001 European Standard EN ISO 9999. (2010). Assistive products for persons with disability- Classification and terminology. Retrieved from https://www.astandis.at/shopV5/Preview.action;jsessionid=43550DB9A2663C E40B22BFB58F29AF11?preview=&dokkey=362746&selectedLocale=en Family Center on Technology and Disability. (2012). Assistive technology solutions. Retrieved from http://www.fctd.info/assets/assets/21/AT_solutionsmay2012. pdf Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (1994). Interviewing the art of science. In N. A. Y. L. Denzin (Ed.), The Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 361–376). Thousands Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd. Fraser, J., & Gutwin, C. (2000). A framework of assistive pointers for low vision users. Proceedings of the Fourth International ACM Conference on Assistive Technologies - Assets ’00, 9–16. doi:10.1145/354324.354329 Freelon, D. G. (2010). ReCal : Intercoder reliability calculation as a web service. International Journal of Internet Science, 5(1), 20–33. Retrieved from http://5.9.69.25/www-ijis-net/ijis5_1/ijis5_1_freelon.pdf Freitas Alves, C. C., Martins Monteiro, G. B., Rabello, S., & Freire Gasparetto, M.E.R. Carvalho, K. M. (2009). Assistive technology applied to education of students with visual impairment. Revista Panamericana de Salud Pública, 26(2), 148–153. Retrieved from http://ehis.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=4&sid=698e4f1d- 51c2-40ab-8eab-42b4d48d8fea%40sessionmgr115&hid=1 371 French, G. (2007). Children’s early learning and development. National Council for Curriculum and Assessment (NCCA). Retrieved from http://www.ncca.ie/uploadedfiles/curriculum/ld background paper may.pdf Fu, F. L., Su, R. C., & Yu, S. C. (2009). EGameFlow: A scale to measure learners’ enjoyment of e-learning games. Computers & Education, 52(1), 101–112. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.004 Furió, D., González-Gancedo, S., Juan, M. C., Seguí, I., & Rando, N. (2013). Evaluation of learning outcomes using an educational iPhone game vs. traditional game. Computers & Education, 64, 1–23. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.12.001 Furtado, J. M., Lansingh, V. C., Carter, M. J., Milanese, M. F., Peña, B. N., Ghersi, H. A., … Silva, J. C. (2012). Causes of blindness and visual impairment in Latin America. Survey of Ophthalmology, 57(2), 149–177. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2011.07.002 Gamble, M. J., Dowler, D. L., & Orslene, L. E. (2006). Assistive technology : Choosing the right tool for the right job. Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 24(2), 73–80. Retrieved from http://ehis.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=7&sid=f12c379cfd11- 4aad-81b5-0137cac8f26f%40sessionmgr11&hid=6 Garcia, I., & Pacheco, C. (2013). A constructivist computational platform to support mathematics education in elementary school. Computers & Education, 66(2013), 25–39. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.02.004 Gardner, H., & Hatch, T. (1989). Multiple intelligence go to school: Educational implications of the theory of multiple intelligence. Educational Reseacher, 18(8), 4–10. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/1176460 Giannakos, M. N. (2013). Enjoy and learn with educational games: Examining factors affecting learning performance. Computers & Education, 68, 429–439. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.06.005 Gilutz, S., & Nielsen, J. (2007). Usability of websites for children. Retrieved from http://www.nngroup.com/reports/kids Global Research Innovation and Technology. (2012). Leverage Freedom Chair (LFC). Retrieved from http://www.gogrit.org/lfc.html Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597–606. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR8-4/golafshani.pdf 372 Guion, L. A., Diehl, D. C., & Mcdonald, D. (2011). Triangulation: Establishing the validity of qualitative studies. Department of Family Youth and Community Sciences, Florida Cooperative Extension Sevice, University of Florida. Guney, A., & Al, S. (2012). Effective learning environments in relation to different learning theories. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2334–2338. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.480 Haniz, I. (2007). Special education, inlcusive practices and the teaching of science and mathematics to chidlren with special needs. Proceedings of International Conference on Science and Mathematics, 1–7. Retrieved from http://www.recsam.edu.my/cosmed/cosmed07/AbstractsFullPapers2007/keynot es & plenary%5CPL001A.pdf Harrel, M.C., & Bradley, M. A. (2009). Data collection methods semi structured interviews and focus groups. United States: RAND Corporation. Hartson, H. R., Andre, T. S., & Williges, R. C. (2003). Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 15(1), 145–181. doi:10.1.1.136.9688 He, W. (2013). Examining students’ online interaction in a live video streaming environment using data mining and text mining. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(1), 90–102. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.07.020 Heracleous, P., Beautemps, D., Ishiguro, H., & Hagita, N. (2011). Towards augmentative speech communication. In I. Ipsic (Ed.), Speech and Language Technologies (pp. 303–318). Europe: InTech. doi:10.5772/16622 Herrington, J. (1997). Authentic learning in interactive multimedia environments. (Doctoral Dissertation, Cowan University Faculty of Science, Technology and Engineering, 1997). Retrieved from http://www.academia.edu/176919/Authentic_learning_in_interactive_multimedi a_environments Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information system research. MIS Quaterly, 28(1), 75–105. Retrieved from http://aisel.aisnet.org/misq/vol28/iss1/6/ Hmelo-Silver, C. E. (2004). Problem-based learning: What and how do students learn? Educational Psychology Review, 16(3), 235–266. doi:10.1023/B:EDPR.0000034022.16470.f3 Hollands, H., Brox, A. C., Chang, A., Adilman, S., Chakraborti, B., Kliever, G., & Maberley, D. A L. (2009). Correctable visual impairment and its impact on quality of life in a marginalized Canadian neighbourhood. Canadian Journal of 373 Ophthalmology. Journal Canadien D’ophtalmologie, 44(1), 42–48. doi:10.3129/i08-167 Holt, C. (2007). Computer programs for classroom games. Retrieved from http://people.virginia.edu/~cah2k/programs.html Hsieh, P. A. J., & Cho, V. (2011). Comparing e-Learning tools’ success: The case of instructor–student interactive vs. self-paced tools. Computers & Education, 57(3), 2025–2038. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2011.05.002 Hsu, C. L., & Liao, Y. C. (2014). Exploring the linkages between perceived information accessibility and microblog stickiness: The moderating role of sense of community. Information & Management, 1–51. doi:10.1016/j.im.2014.08.005 Hung, W., Jonassen, D. H., Liu, R. (2008). Problem-based learning. In M. P. Spector, J.M., Merrill, M.D., Merrianboer, J.V., & Driscoll (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology (3rd Edition., pp. 485–500). New York: Taylor & Francis Group. doi:10.1007/978-1-4419-1428- 6_210 Iacono, J. C., Brown, A., & Holtham, C. (2011). The use of the case study method in theory testing: The example of steel e-marketplaces. The Electrical Journal of Business Research Methods, 9(1), 57–65. Retrieved from http://www.ejbrm.com Individuals with Disabilities Education Act. (2004). Public law 108-446. Retrieved from http://nichcy.org/wp-content/uploads/docs/PL108-446.pdf International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems. (2010). Instruction manual. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/ICD10Volume2_en_2010.pdf Jack, E. P., & Raturi, A. S. (2006). Lessons learned from methodological triangulation in management research. Management Research News, 29(6), 345–357. doi:10.1108/01409170610683833 Jacko, J. A., & Vitense, H. S. (2001). A review and reappraisal of information technologies within a conceptual framework for individuals with disabilities. Universal Access in the Information Society, 1(1), 56–76. doi:10.1007/s102090100003 Jiang, L., & Yi, M. (2011). Development of electronic teaching material of modern P.E. educational technology upon problem-based learning. International Conference on E-Education, Entertainment and E-Management, 367–370. doi:10.1109/ICeEEM.2011.6137865 374 John Clarkson, P., & Coleman, R. (2013). History of inclusive design in the UK. Applied Ergonomics, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.03.002 Johnson, C., & Gooliaff, S. (2010). Teaching to strengths: Engaging young boys in learning. Reclaiming Children and Youth, 21(4), 28–32. Retrieved from https://reclaimingjournal.com/ Joyojeet, P., Manas, P., & Rakesh, B. (2011). Assistive technology for visionimpairments : An agenda for the ICTD community. Proceedings of the International World Wide Web Conference, 513–522. Retrieved from http://wwwconference.org/www2011/proceeding/companion/p513.pdf June, R. (2011). Promising future for creative content industry. Bussiness Time. Retrieved from http://blis2.bernama.com.eserv.uum.edu.my/mainHomeBypass.do Kaczmarek, L. D., Kashdan, T. B., Drążkowski, D., Bujacz, A., & Goodman, F. R. (2014). Why do greater curiosity and fewer depressive symptoms predict gratitude intervention use? Utility beliefs, social norm, and self-control beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, 66, 165–170. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.032 Kaczmarek, L. D., Kashdan, T. B., Kleiman, E. M., Baczkowski, B., Enko, J., Siebers, A., … Baran, B. (2013). Who self-initiates gratitude interventions in daily life? An examination of intentions, curiosity, depressive symptoms, and life satisfaction. Personality and Individual Differences, 55(7), 805–810. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2013.06.013 Kährik, P., Leijen, Ä., & Kivestu, T. (2012). Developing music listening skills using active learning methods in secondary education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 45, 206–215. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.557 Kajornboon, A. B. (2005). Using interviews as research instruments. E-Journal for Researching Teachers, 2(1), 1–452. Retrieved from http://www.culi.chula.ac.th/research/publications/4 Research and Academic Ariticles.pdf Kamei-hannan, C., Howe, J., Herrera, R. R., & Erin, J. N. (2012). Perceptions of teachers of students with visual impairments regarding assistive technology: A follow-up study to a university course. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, 106(10), 666–679. Retrieved from http://connection.ebscohost.com/c/articles/82713668/perceptions-teachersstudents- visual-impairments-regarding-assistive-technology-follow-up-studyuniversity- course 375 Keates, S., Clarkson, P. J., Harrison, L. A., & Robinson, P. (2000). Towards a practical inclusive design approach. Proceedings on the 2000 Conference on Universal Usability - CUU ’00, 45–52. doi:10.1145/355460.355471 Keeney, R. L., & Winterfeldt, D. V. (1991). Complex technical problems. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38(3), 191–201. doi:10.1109/17.83752 Keller, J. (2000). How to integrate learner motivation planning into lesson planning: The ARCS model approach. ViII Semanario Santiago: Running Head: Integrating Motivation. Retrieved from http://apps.fischlerschool.nova.edu/toolbox/instructionalproducts/itde8005/wee klys/2000-Keller-ARCSLessonPlanning.pdf Kerkmann, F. (2012). Accessibility of web search engines: Towards a deeper understanding of barriers for people with disabilities. Library Review, 61(8), 608–621. doi:10.1108/00242531211292105 Khadka, J., Ryan, B., Margrain, T. H., Woodhouse, J. M., & Davies, N. (2012). Listening to voices of children with a visual impairment: A focus group study. British Journal of Visual Impairment, 30(3), 182–196. doi:10.1177/0264619612453105 Khairuddin, K., Noor Faezah, M. Y., & Md. Jan, N. (2010). Refining technical and learning accessibility elements on e-learning for user with visual impairment. 2010 International Symposium on Information Technology, 1–4. doi:10.1109/ITSIM.2010.5561331 Khedif, L. Y. B., Engkamat, A., & Jack, S. (2014). The evaluation of users’ satisfaction towards the multimedia elements in a courseware. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 123, 249–255. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1421 Kiley, M., Mullins, G., Peterson, R. F., & Rogers, L. (2000). Leep into...problembased learning. Australia: University of Adelaide. Retrieved from http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/dspace/bitstream/2440/71220/1/hdl_71220.pdf Kim, J., Kang, P., & Choi, I. (2014). Pleasure now, meaning later: Temporal dynamics between pleasure and meaning. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1–42. doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2014.07.018 Kim, Y. (2010). The pilot study in qualitative inquiry: Identifying issues and learning lessons for culturally competent research. Qualitative Social Work, 10(2), 190–206. doi:10.1177/1473325010362001 376 Kimonen, E., & Nevalainen, R. (2005). Active learning in the process of educational change. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(6), 623–635. doi:10.1016/j.tate.2005.05.003 Knox, K. C. (2012). It’s all in the translation. Information Today, 29(8), 21. Retrieved from http://ehis.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=9&sid=8664fa9d- 2664-4aeb-9ffb-6cc81fa7d1bf%40sessionmgr115&hid=121 Konicek, K., Hyzny, J., & Allegra, R. (2003). Electronic reserves: the promise and challenge to increase accessibility. Library Hi Tech, 21(1), 102–108. doi:10.1108/07378830310467445 Kring, A. M., & Barch, D. M. (2014). The motivation and pleasure dimension of negative symptoms: neural substrates and behavioral outputs. European Neuropsychopharmacology : The Journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology, 24(5), 725–736. doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2013.06.007 Kuusela, H., & Paul, P. (2000). A comparison of concurrent and retrospective verbal protocol analysis. American Journal of Psychology, 113(3), 387–404. doi:10.2307/1423365. Lacey, A., & Luff, D. (2001). Trent focus for research and development in primary health care: An introduction qualitative data analysis. Sheffield: Trent Focus. Lambert, S. D., & Loiselle, C. G. (2008). Combining individual interviews and focus groups to enhance data richness. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 62(2), 228–237. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2007.04559.x Leader, S., & Thompson, R. W. (1999). The structured interview. RTO HFM Workshop, 1–10. Retrieved from http://ftp.rta.nato.int/public//PubFulltext/RTO/MP/RTO-MP-055///MP-055- 12.pdf Lee, H., & Templeton, R. (2008). Ensuring equal access to technology: Providing assistive technology for students with disabilities. Theory Into Practice, 47(3), 212–219. doi:10.1080/00405840802153874 Leech, B. L. (2006). Asking questions: Techniques for semistructured interviews. Political Science and Politics, 35(4), 665–668. Retrieved from http://links.jstor.org/sici?sici=1049- 0965%28200212%2935%3A4%3C665%3AAQTFSI%3E2.O.C0%3B2- 377 Li, J., Ma, S., & Ma, L. (2012). The study on the effect of educational games for the development of students’ logic-mathematics of multiple intelligence. Physics Procedia, 33, 1749–1752. doi:10.1016/j.phpro.2012.05.280 Liffick, B. W. (2003). Assistive technology in computer science. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Information and Communication Technologies, 46–51. doi:1.717.872.3536 Limna, T., Sae-tang, C., Jantaraprim, C., Tandayya, P., & Niyompol, W. (2007). Linux user interface and front-end operation for the visually impaired. Proceedings of the 1st International Convention on Rehabilitation Engineering & Assistive Technology in Conjunction with 1st Tan Tock Seng Hospital Neurorehabilitation Meeting, 179–184. doi:10.1145/1328491.1328537 Loiacono, E. T., Djamasbi, S., & Kiryazov, T. (2013). Factors that affect visually impaired users’ acceptance of audio and music websites. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 71, 321–334. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2012.10.015 Lombardi, I. (2012). Not-so-serious games for language learning. Now with 99,9% more humour on top. Procedia of Computer Science, 15, 148–158. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.066 LoPresti, E. F., Bodine, C., & Lewis, C. (2008). Assistive technology for cognition. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine : The Quarterly Magazine of the Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society, 27(2), 29–39. doi:10.1109/EMB.2007.907396 Luo, H. (2011). Qualitative research on educational technology: Philosophies, methods and challenges. International Journal of Education, 3(2), 1–16. doi:10.5296/ije.v3i2.857 Maaike, J., & Menno, D. T. (2003). Exploring two methods of usability testing: Concurrent versus retrospective think-aloud protocols. International Professional Communication Conference, 285–287. Retrieved from http://ieeexplore.ieee.org.ezaccess.library.uitm.edu.my/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&ar number=1245501 Maćesić-Petrović, D., Vučinić, V., & Eškirović, B. (2010). Cognitive development of the children with visual impairment and special educational treatment. Procedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 5, 157–162. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.07.065 Malaysian Commisioner of Law Revision. (2006). Communications and multimedia act 1998. Retrieved from http://www.agc.gov.my/Akta/Vol. 12/Act 588.pdf 378 Malaysian Department of Social Welfare. (2013). Disability. Retrieved from http://www.jkm.gov.my/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=363 :a-Pendaftaran&Itemid=&lang=en Malaysian Goverment. (2013). Disabled persons. Retrieved from http://www.malaysia.gov.my/EN/Relevant Topics/Society and Life/Citizen/SocialWelfareandCommunication/DisabledPersons/Pages/Disabled Persons.aspx Malaysian Ministry of Education. (2011). Modul pendidikan khas bermasalah penglihatan. Retrieved from http://www.lmsipda.net/ppg_lms/file.php/1/MODUL_PPG_SEMESTER_1/PK U3101_Pengenalan_Kepada_Pendidikan_Khas.pdf Malaysian Ministry of Education. (2012). Panduan pengajaran dan pembelajaran kemahiran asas individu masalah penglihatan. Putrajaya: Malaysian Goverment. Malik, S., & Janjua, F. (2011). Active lecturing: An effective pedagogic approach. International Journal of Academic Research, 3(2), 963–968. doi:10.7813/2075- 4124.2013 March, S. T., & Smith, G. F. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15, 251–266. doi:10.1016/0167-9236(94)00041-2 Marianne, W. L. (1998). Iterative triangulation : A theory development process using existing case studies. Journal of Operations Management, 16(4), 455–469. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(98)00024-2 Martin, J. J., & Choi, Y. S. (2009). Parents’ physical activity-related perceptions of their children with disabilities. Disability and Health Journal, 2(1), 9–14. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.09.001 Martínez, L., & Pluke, M. (2014). Mandate M 376: New software accessibility requirements. Procedia Computer Science, 27(2014), 271–280. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2014.02.030 Martyn, B. M. (2007). Clickers in the classroom: An active learning approach. Educause Quaterly, (2), 71–74. Retrieved from http://net.educause.edu/ir/library/pdf/eqm0729.pdf Marzita, P., Mazlini, A., Mohd Hairy, I., Noraini, M. N., & Che Nidzam, C. (2014). An analysis of comfortable teaching and learning environment: Community response to climate change in school. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 285–290. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.209 379 Masmuzidin, M. Z., Jiang, J., & Wan, T. (2012). Learning moral values through virtual technology: The development and evaluation of Malaysian virtual folktales- Hikayat Land. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31, 315– 322. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.061 Mates, B.T., & Booth, C. (2012). Information power to all patrons. Library Technology Report, 48(7), 7–13. Retrieved from http://ehis.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=5&sid=8f418f3ad9f1- 4b5f-9e7b-1a84913528f0%40sessionmgr4&hid=121 Matson, J. L., Mahan, S., & LoVullo, S. V. (2009). Parent training: A review of methods for children with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 30(5), 961–968. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2009.01.009 Mayer, R. E. (1989). Models for understanding. Review of Educational Research, 59(1), 43–64. doi:10.3102/00346543059001043 Mayer, R. E. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York: Cambridge University Press. Mayer, R. E. (2003). The promise of multimedia learning: Using the same instructional design methods across different media. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 125–139. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00016-6 Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2003). Nine ways to reduce cognitive load in multimedia learning. Educational Psychologist, 38(1), 43–52. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3801_6 Mazyrah, M., Wan Fatimah, W. A., Shahrina, M. N., & Suziah, S. (2008). A conceptual framework for english language courseware using storytelling approach: Case study in University Teknologi Petronas. Information Technology Symposium, 1–6. doi:10.1109/ITSIM.2008.4631704 McCord, L., & McCord, W. (2010). Online learning: Getting comfortable in the cyber class. Teaching and Learning in Nursing, 5(1), 27–32. doi:10.1016/j.teln.2009.05.003 Mechlova, E., & Malcik, M. (2012). ICT in changes of learning theories. International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA), 253–262. doi:10.1109/ICETA.2012.6418326 Melissa, N. L., Yen, A., & See, C. M. (2011). Employment of people with disabilities in Malaysia: Drivers and inhibitors. International Journal of Special Education, 26(1), 112–124. Meme, Z. R. (2010). Empowering persons with disabilities in Malaysia. 10th BGM of the East Asia Pasific Regional Council of Cheshire Home, 1–27. Retrieved from http://www.sabahcheshirehome.org/eapacrc2010/download/COUNCIL OF CHESHIRE HOME - Empowering PWDs- dto meme.pdf Microsoft Corporation. (2013). Types of assistive technology products. Retrieved from http://www.microsoft.com/enable/at/types.aspx Miles, D. R., Steiner, M. J., Luken, K. J., Sanderson, M. R., Coyne-Beasley, T., Herrick, H., … Ford, C. A. (2011). Health and educational status of children raised by a caregiver with a disability. Disability and Health Journal, 4(3), 185–191. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2011.03.004 Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. Mills, M. (2010). Deaf jam: From inscription to preproduction to information. Social Text, 28(1), 35–58. doi:10.1215/01642472-2009-059 Miñón, R., Moreno, L., Martínez, P., & Abascal, J. (2014). An approach to the integration of accessibility requirements into a user interface development method. Science of Computer Programming, 86(2014), 58–73. doi:10.1016/j.scico.2013.04.005 Minou, T., & Manuchehr, T. (2012). Analysis of the recent international documents toward inclusive education of children with disablities. Cypriot Journal of Educational Sciences, 7(3), 229–243. Retrieved from http://www.worldeducation- center.org/index.php/cjes/article/view/7.3.8/7.3.8 Mohd Najib, A. R. (2011). Full text of Prime Minister’s 2012 budget speech at the Dewan Rakyat. Retrieved from http://blis2.bernama.com.eserv.uum. edu.my/mainHomeBypass.do Mohd Najib, A. R. (2012, September 27). The 2013 budget speech. New Straits Time. Retrieved from http://www.nst.com.my/2013budget/full-text-of-the- 2013-budget-speech-1.149226 Moran, J. M., Rain, M., Page-Gould, E., & Mar, R. A. (2014). Do I amuse you? Asymmetric predictors for humor appreciation and humor production. Journal of Research in Personality, 49, 8–13. doi:10.1016/j.jrp.2013.12.002 Morfidi, E., Papachristos, N. M., & Mikropoulos, T. A. (2010). Teachers’ implementation of a hypermedia application for children with severe learning disabilities. 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, 267–273. doi:10.1109/INCOS.2010.25 Mtebe, J. S., & Twaakyondo, H. M. (2012). Developing and using animations and simulations to teach computer science courses: The case of University of Dar Es Salaam. 2012 International Conference on E-Learning and E-Technologies in Education (ICEEE), 240–246. doi:10.1109/ICeLeTE.2012.6333383 Muhammad Haziq, L.A., Syariffanor, H., & Shahril, P. (2009). MyLexics : An assistive courseware for dyslexic children to learn basic Malay language. Newsletter ACM SIGACCESS Accessibility and Computing, (95), 3–9. doi:10.1145/1651259.1651260 Mulhall, A. (2003). In the field: Notes on observation in qualitative research. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 41(3), 306–13. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12581118 Murray, I., & Armstrong, H. (2004). A computing education vision for the sight impaired. In Y. Raymond, L., & Alison (Ed.), Conferences in Research and Practices in Information Technology (pp. 201–206). Dunedin, New Zealand: Australian, Computer Society, Inc. Retrieved from http://crpit.com/confpapers/CRPITV30Murray.pdf Nantanoot, S. (2013). Accessibility evaluation of online learning management system for person with visual impairment. (Doctoral Dissertation, School of Informatics and Computing, Indiana University). National Early Childhood Intervention Council. (2013). Children with disabilities in Malaysia. Retrieved from www.necicmalaysia.org/view_file.cfm?fileid=129 Nielsen, J., Clemmensen, T., & Yssing, C. (2002). Getting access to what goes on in people’s heads? - Reflections on the think-aloud technique. Proceedings of the Second Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, 101–110. doi:10.1145/572020.572033 Nik Siti Hanifah, N. A., Tao, R. W., & Ping, J. (2011). Immersive environment courseware evaluation. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 15(2011), 1667–1676. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.03.350 Niroo, M., Nejhad, G. H. H., & Haghani, M. (2012). The effect of Gardner theory application on mathematical/logical intelligence and student’s mathematical functioning relationship. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 47, 2169–2175. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.967 Nor Azah, A. A., Roznim, M. R., & Khairunnisa, R. (2010). Preschool multimedia interactive courseware : Classifying object (mengelaskan objek) PMICMO. 2010 Second WRI World Congress on Software Engineering, 318–322. doi:10.1109/WCSE.2010.41 Norazzila, S., Tengku Norainun, T. S., & Mohd Shahir, L. (2010). Mastery learning assessment model (MLAM) in teaching and learning mathematics. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8, 294–298. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.040 Norfarhana, A., Wan Fatimah, W. A., & Emelia Akashah, P. A. (2010). Multimedia design and development in “ Komputer Saya ” courseware for slow learners. Second International Conference on Computer Research Nad Development, 354–358. doi:10.1109/ICCRD.2010.44 Norfarhana, A., Wan Fatimah, W.A., & Emelia Akashah, P. A. (2012). Development and usability study of multimedia courseware for slow learners: “Komputer Saya.” 2012 International Conference on Computer & Information Science (ICCIS), 1110–1114. doi:10.1109/ICCISci.2012.6297192 Norshuhada, S., & Shahizan, H. (2010). Design research in software development: Comstructing and linking research questions, objectives, methods, and outcomes. Sintok: Penerbit Universiti Utara Malaysia. Nurulnadwan, A., Nur Hazwani, M. R., & Ariffin, A. M. (2011). Visually impaired children’s acceptances on assistive courseware. American Journal of Applied Sciences, 8(10), 1019–1026. doi:10.3844/ajassp.2011.1019.1026 Nurulnadwan, A., Nur Hazwani, M. R., Erratul Shiela, E., & Ariffin, A. M. (2010). Assistive courseware for the visually impaired based on theory of multiple intelligence. Proceedings of the Knowledge Management International Conference, 192–197. Nurulnadwan, A., Nur Hazwani, M. R., Erratul Shiela, E., & Ariffin, A. M. (2011). Assistive courseware for the visually impaired based on theory of multiple intelligence and SECI model. American Journal of Economics and Business Administration, 3(1), 150–156. doi:10.3844/ajebasp.2011.150.156 O’Dea, M. (2012). Assistive technology: A system of support for including students with diabilities within general education programs. [Powerpoint slides] Special Education Consultant, Learning Resource Center-Central NJDOE/Office of Special Education Programs. O’Donoghue, T., & Punch, K. (2003). Qualitative educational research in action: Doing and reflecting. New York: RoutledgeFalmer. Obikwelu, C., & Read, J. C. (2012). The serious game constructivist framework for children’s learning. Procedia Computer Science, 15, 32–37. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2012.10.055 Office for Disability Issues. (2010). Equality act 2010 guidance. Retrieved from http://odi.dwp.gov.uk/docs/wor/new/ea-guide.pdf Ohene-Djan, J., & Shipsey, R. (2008). Principles for inclusive software design of learning technologies. 2008 Eighth IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies, 989–990. doi:10.1109/ICALT.2008.254 Orji, H. U. (2007). Effects of U.S. presidents’ leadership roles on global security: A case Carter and Bush. (Doctoral Dissertation, University of Phoenix, 2007). Retrieved from http://gradworks.umi.com/3285584.pdf Othman, T. (2013). ATLAS.ti: Pengenalan analisis data kualitatif 140 illustrasi langkah demi langkah. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: MPWS Rich Publication. Oxford Dictionary. (2014). Oxford Dictionaries Language Matters. Oxford Universitiy Press: UK. Özyurt, Ö., Özyurt, H., Baki, A., & Güven, B. (2013). Integration into mathematics classrooms of an adaptive and intelligent individualized e-learning environment: Implementation and evaluation of UZWEBMAT. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(3), 726–738. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.11.013 Pange, J., Lekka, A., & Toki, E. I. (2010). Different learning theories applied to diverse learning subjects : A pilot study. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 9, 800–804. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.12.237 Pathak, A., & Intratat, C. (2012). Use of semi-structured interviews to investigate teacher perceptions of student collaboration. Malaysian Journal of ELT Research, 8(1), 1–10. Retrieved from http://www.melta.org.my/majer/ParthakA.pdf Patomäki, S., Raisamo, R., Salo, J., Pasto, V., & Hippula, A. (2004). Experiences on haptic interfaces for visually impaired young children. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Multimodal Interfaces, 281–288. doi:10.1145/1027933.1027979 Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation method. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publication Ltd. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M. A., & Chatterjee, S. (2007a). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77. doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222240302 Permvattana, R., Murray, I., & Hollier, S. (2006). Innovations in tertiary online for students who are blind or vision impaired. 2006 7th International Conference on Information Technology Based Higher Education and Training, 507–512. doi:10.1109/ITHET.2006.339804 Pernice, K., & Nielson, J. (2001). Usability guidelines for accessible web design. Retrieved from http://media.nngroup.com/media/ reports/free/Usability_Guidelines_for_Accesible_ Web_Design.pdf Phellas, C. N., Bloch, A., & Seale, C. (2011). Structured methods: Interviews, questionnaires, and observation. In C. Seale (Ed.), Researching Society and Culture (3rd Edition., pp. 181–205). United Kingdom: SAGE Publications Ltd. Plant, K. M., & Sanders, M. R. (2007). Reducing problem behavior during caregiving in families of preschool-aged children with developmental disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 28(4), 362–385. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2006.02.009 Ploetzner, R., & Lowe, R. (2004). Dynamic visualisations and learning. Learning and Instruction, 14(3), 235–240. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.06.001 Preece, J., Rogers, Y., & Sharp, H. (2007). Interaction design: Beyond humancomputer interaction (2nd ed.). England: John Wiley & Sons. Pugsley, L. (2011). How to...Begin to get to grips with educational theory. Education for Primary Care, 22(4), 266–268. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21781396 Punch, S. (2002). Research with children: The same or different from research with adults? Childhood, 9(3), 321–341. doi:10.1177/0907568202009003005 Rahmah, L. Y., Hafiza, A., & Tengku Nazatul, T. P. (2012). Affective engineering of background colour in digital storytelling for remedial students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 68, 202–212. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.220 Rahmah, L. Y., & Tengku Nazatul, T. P. (2012). Reading activities using the scaffolding in MEL-SindD for down syndrome children. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 35(2011), 121–128. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.02.070 Raisamo, R., Hippula, A., Patomäki, S., Tuominen, E., Pasto, V., & Hasu, M. (2006). Testing usability of multimodal applications with visually impaired. MultiMedia, IEEE, 13(3), 70–76. doi:10.1109/MMUL.2006.68 Rapley, T. J. (2001). The art (fulness) of open-ended interviewing: Some considerations on analysing interviews. Qualitative Research, 1(3), 303–323. doi:10.1177/146879410100100303 385 Rashid, A., Sharif, M., Narina, A. S., & Rosman, Y. (2014). Personality and happiness among academicians in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 4209–4212. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.918 Rasmeet, K. C., & Ahalya, S. (2011). The effect of visual impairment on quality of life of children aged 3-16 years. The British Journal of Ophthalmology, 95(5), 642–645. doi:10.1136/bjo.2010.182386 Reichle, J. (2011). Evaluating assistive technology in the education of persons with severe disabilities. Journal of Behavioral Education, 20(1), 77–85. doi:10.1007/s10864-011-9121-1 Retournard, J.F., & Evans-Klock, C. (2010). Disability in the workplace: Company practices. Geneva, Switzerland: International Labour Organization (ILO). Ripat, J. D., & Woodgate, R. L. (2011). Locating assistive technology within an emancipatory disability research framework. Technology and Disability, 23(2), 87–92. doi:10.3233/TAD-2011-0315 Rogers, Y., Sharp, H., & Preece, J. (2011). Interaction design: Beyond human computer interaction (3rd ed.). England: John Wiley & Sons. Rossafri, M. (2012). The design, development and evaluation of an adaptive multimedia learning environment courseware among history teachers. Procedia Technology, 1, 72–76. doi:10.1016/j.protcy.2012.02.014 Roulston, K., DeMarrais, K., & Lewis, J. B. (2003). Learning to interview in the social sciences. Qualitative Inquiry, 9(4), 643–668. doi:10.1177/1077800403252736 Rubin, A., & Babbie, E. R. (2008). Research methods for social work. Belmont, CA: Thomson Brooks/Cole. Sabri, S., Firdaus, Y., & Shahrizal, N. (2013). EZ-Arabic for children: A virtual learning resource tool for Malaysian primary schools. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 396–404. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.07.108 Sabrina, M. R. (2012). An exploration of the process of brand identity building and internal organisational culture. (Doctoral dissertation, Lincoln University, 2012). Sakini, M. S. (2011). Malaysia creative content industry has grown tremendously, says info. Bernama. Retrieved from http://blis2.bernama.com. eserv.uum.edu.my/mainHomeBypass.do Salminen, A. (2008). European research related to assistive technology for disabled children. Technology and Disability, 20(3), 173–178. Retrieved from http://ehis.ebscohost.com/ehost/ pdfviewer/pdfviewer?vid=7&sid=482269b7-dbb0-4182- a742-8e13d0c979d8%40sessionmgr113&hid=121 Sampson, D. G., & Zervas, P. (2010). Technology-enhanced training for people with disabilities: The eAccess2Learn framework. 2010 International Conference on Intelligent Networking and Collaborative Systems, 244–251. doi:10.1109/INCOS.2010.66 Samson, A. C., Lackner, H. K., Weiss, E. M., & Papousek, I. (2012). Perception of other people’s mental states affects humor in social anxiety. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 43(1), 625–631. doi:10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.08.007 Sandhya, S., & Devi, K. A. S. (2011). Accessibility evaluation of websites using screen reader. 2011 7th International Conference on Next Generation Web Services Practices, 338–341. doi:10.1109/NWeSP.2011.6088201 Savita, K. S., & Nur Athirah, A. P. (2011). Malay sign language courseware for hearing-impaired children in Malaysia. World Applied Sciences Journal, 12, 59–64. Retrieved from http://idosi.org/wasj/wasj12(CA&KM)2011.htm Schatz, E. (2009). Nesting semi-structured interviews in surveys or censuses: More than the sum of the parts. Retrieved from http://www.colorado.edu/ibs/pubs/pop/pop2009-0008.pdf Scherer, M. J., Craddock, G., & Mackeogh, T. (2011). The relationship of personal factors and subjective well-being to the use of assistive technology devices. Disability and Rehabilitation, 33(10), 811–817. doi:10.3109/09638288.2010.511418 Scherer, M. J., & Glueckauf, R. (2005). Assessing the benefits of assistive technologies for activities and participation. Rehabilitation Psychology, 50(2), 132–141. doi:10.1037/0090-5550.50.2.132 Schmidt, H. G., Rotgans, J. I., & Yew, E. H. J. (2011). The process of problem-based learning: what works and why. Medical Education, 45(8), 792–806. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2923.2011.04035.x Schmidt-Weigand, F., Kohnert, A., & Glowalla, U. (2010). A closer look at split visual attention in system- and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 20(2), 100–110. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.02.011 Schneider, J., Leeder, S.R., Gopinath, B., Wang, J.J., & Mitchell, P. (2010). Frequency, course, and impact of correctable visual impairment (uncorrected refractive error). Survey of Ophthalmology, 55(6), 539–560. doi:10.1016/j.survophthal.2010.02.004 Schnotz, W., & Lowe, R. (2003). External and internal representations in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 13(2), 117–123. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00015-4 Schurink, J., Cox, R. F. A., Cillessen, A. H. N., Rens, G. H. M. B., & Boonstra, F. N. (2011). Low vision aids for visually impaired children: A perception-action perspective. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(3), 871–882. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2011.01.027 Seo, Y. J., & Woo, H. (2010). The identification, implementation, and evaluation of critical user interface design features of computer-assisted instruction programs in mathematics for students with learning disabilities. Computers & Education, 55(1), 363–377. doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.02.002 Sesen, B. A., & Tarhan, L. (2010). Promoting active learning in high school chemistry: Learning achievement and attitude. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2(2), 2625–2630. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.384 Shandra, C. L., Avery, R.C., Hogan, D. P., & Msall, M. E. (2012). Child and adult disability in the 2000 Census: disability is a household affair. Disability and Health Journal, 5(4), 241–248. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2012.07.004 Shannon, P., & Tappan, C. (2011). A qualitative analysis of child protective services practice with children with developmental disabilities. Children and Youth Services Review, 33(9), 1469–1475. doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.11.014 Shaw, C., Brady, L., & Davey, C. (2011). Guidelines for research with children and young people. NCB Research Centre, London. Sheng, W. B., & Lifeng, K. (2012). Mastery learning in the context of university education education. Journal of the NUS Teaching Academy, 2(4), 206–222. Retrieved from http://www.nus.edu.sg/teaching academy/jnusta/v2n4/v2n4p206_Kang.pdf Silius, K., & Tervakari, A. (2003). An evaluation of the usefulness of web-based learning environments: The evaluation tool into the portal of Finnish Virtual University. International Conference on Network Universities and E-Learning, 1–10. doi:10.1.1.123.5095 Silva, M. L. Da, Gonçalves, D., & Silva, H. (2014). User-tuned content customization for children with autism spectrum disorders. Procedia Computer Science, 27, 441–448. doi:10.1016/j.procs.2014.02.048 Sinha, A. C., & Baumann, B. (2010). Anesthesia for ocular trauma. Current Anaesthesia & Critical Care, 21(4), 184–188. doi:10.1016/j.cacc.2010.05.001 Siti Mahfuzah, S. (2011). Conceptual design model of computerized personaldecision aid (ComPDA). (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 2011). Retrieved from http://etd.uum.edu.my Siti Zaharah, M., & Nor Azan, M. Z. (2011). Accessible courseware for kids with hearing impaired (MudahKiu): A preliminary analysis. 2011 International Conference on Pattern Analysis and Intelligent Robotics, 197–202. doi:10.1109/ICPAIR.2011.5976944 Siu, K. W. M., & Lam, M. S. (2012). Public computer assisted learning facilities for children with visual impairment: Universal design for inclusive learning. Early Childhood Education Journal, 40(5), 295–303. doi:10.1007/s10643-011-0502-9 Sobihatun Nur, A. S. (2010). The development and effects of a persuasive multimedia learning environment (PMLE) in reducing children dental anxiety. (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 2010). Sobihatun Nur, A. S., Wan Ahmad Jaafar, W. Y., & Azillah, M. A. (2010). Using persuasive design principles in motivational feeling towards children dental anxiety (CDA). In T. Ploug, P. Hasle, & H. Oinas-Kukkonen (Eds.), Persuasive Technology (pp. 223–237). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-13226-1_23 Sodnik, J., Jakus, G., & Tomažič, S. (2011). Multiple spatial sounds in hierarchical menu navigation for visually impaired computer users. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 69, 100–112. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2010.10.004 Southwell, K.L.,& Slater, J. (2012). Accessibility of digital special collections using screen readers. Library Hi Tech, 30(3), 457–471. doi:10.1108/07378831211266609 Stumbo, N. J., Martin, J. K., & Hedrick, B. N. (2009). Assistive technology : Impact on education, employment, and independence of individuals with physical disabilities. Journal of Vocational Rehabilition, 30(2), 99–110. doi:10.3233/JVR-2009-0456 Suziah, S., Siti Nur Syazana, M. S., Mean, F. O., & Halabi, H. (2010). Understanding domain expert’s perspectives and expectations in assistive technology. 2010 International Symposium on Information Technology, 1164–1167. doi:10.1109/ITSIM.2010.5561491 Syamsul Bahrin, Z. (2011). Mobile game-based learning (mGBL) engineering model. (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Utara Malaysia, 2011). Retrieved from http://etd.uum.edu.my/2807/ Syazwan, N., & Wan Fatimah, W. A. (2010). Implementation of design and learning theories in multimedia courseware development : Lines & planes in 3-Dimensions. 2010 International Conference on User Science Engineering, 93–97. doi:10.1109/IUSER.2010.5716730 Synofzik, M., Schlaepfer, T. E., & Fins, J. J. (2012). How happy is too happy? Euphoria, neuroethics, and deep brain stimulation of the nucleus accumbens. AJOB Neuroscience, 3(1), 30–36. doi:10.1080/21507740.2011.635633 Tan, H. K., Schmidt, D., Stanford, M., Teär-Fahnehjelm, K., Ferret, N., Salt, A., & Gilbert, R. (2007). Risk of visual impairment in children with congenital toxoplasmic retinochoroiditis. American Journal of Ophthalmology, 144(5), 648–653. doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2007.07.013 Targher, S., Occelli, V., & Zampini, M. (2012). Audiovisual integration in low vision individuals. Neuropsychologia, 50(5), 576–82. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.10.021 Taylor-powell, E., & Steele, S. (1996). Collecting evaluation data: Direct observation. University of Wisconsin-Extension. Retrieved from http://learningstore.uwex.edu/assets/pdfs/G3658-5.pdf Teddlie, C., & Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77–100. doi:10.1177/2345678906292430 Teo, H. H., Chan, H. C., Wei, K. K., & Zhang, Z. (2003). Evaluating information accessibility and community adaptivity features for sustaining virtual learning communities. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(5), 671–697. doi:10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00087-9 Thao, L., & Quynh, L. (1997). Web-based evaluation of courseware. Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education. Retrieved from http://cms.ascilite.org.au/conferences/perth97/ papers/Le/Le.html Thurlings, M., Vermeulen, M., Bastiaens, T., & Stijnen, S. (2013). Understanding feedback: A learning theory perspective. Educational Research Review, 9(1), 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2012.11.004 Tullis, J. G., & Benjamin, A. S. (2011). On the effectiveness of self-paced learning. Journal of Memory and Language, 64(2), 109–118. doi:10.1016/j.jml.2010.11.002 Turner, D. W. (2010). Qualitative interview design: A practical guide for novice investigators. The Qualitative Report, 15(3), 754–760. Retrieved from http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR15-3/qid.pdf United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2012). Education for all movement. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/ education/themes/leading-the-internationalagenda/ education-for-all/ University of Strathclyde. (2013). Unstructured observation. Retrieved from http://www.strath.ac.uk/aer/materials/3data collection/unit5/unstructuredobservation/ Vaishnavi, V., & Kuechler, W. (2007). Design science research methods and patterns: Innovating information and communication technology. New York: Auerbach Publications. Van der Zee, K. I., Bakker, A. B., & Bakker, P. (2002). Why are structured interviews so rarely used in personnel selection? Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(1), 176–184. doi:10.1037//0021-9010.87.1.176 Vaquer, N. (2011). A voice and a choice for students with special needs. Philadelphia Social Innovations Journal, 1(1), 1–3. Retrieved from http://www.philasocialinnovations.org/site/images/ stories/psij/downloads/psij_journal_0411.pdf

Conceptual design and development model of assistive courseware for young low vision learners (AC4LV)

Similar Items