Kajian hubungan budaya organisasi dan inovasi dengan prestasi koperasi dan faktor penyederhana integrasi strategi di kalangan koperasi di Perak

Kajian hubungan budaya organisasi dan inovasi dengan prestasi koperasi dan faktor penyederhana integrasi strategi di kalangan koperasi di Perak

The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships between organizational culture and innovation towards performance of cooperative, with moderating effects of integration strategy. The study was using Balanced Scorecard concepts for measuring cooperative performance due to resources need...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Adijah, Ayob
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2016
Subjects:
HD58.9 Organizational Effectiveness.
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/6352/1/s811006_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/6352/2/s811006_02.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.6352
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Ramli, Azahari
topic HD58.9 Organizational Effectiveness.
spellingShingle HD58.9 Organizational Effectiveness.
Adijah, Ayob
Kajian hubungan budaya organisasi dan inovasi dengan prestasi koperasi dan faktor penyederhana integrasi strategi di kalangan koperasi di Perak
description The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships between organizational culture and innovation towards performance of cooperative, with moderating effects of integration strategy. The study was using Balanced Scorecard concepts for measuring cooperative performance due to resources need to be integrated for cooperative improvement. Problems arise when one measure cooperative performance not as a whole and most of research found on cooperative performance is not based on Malaysian contexts. In addition, this study was made for resources involvement in performance improvement and the relationship that may exist. This study using quantitative methods with population among 1373 cooperatives located in Perak, Malaysia. The findings received from only one representative for each cooperative to be tested. The sample size consists of 300 respondents of various backgrounds, various types of cooperatives and still in operation. A total of 124 or 41% completed questionnaires were tested in this study. Finding shows that there is no relationship between between organizational culture and cooperative performance. However, there is a significant relationship between innovation and cooperative performance. The study also found that integration strategy has been moderating the relationship between organizational culture, innovation and cooperative performance. The researcher suggest that future studies should be carried out throughout Malaysia in order to get more accurate findings with more independent variables to be examine.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Adijah, Ayob
author_facet Adijah, Ayob
author_sort Adijah, Ayob
title Kajian hubungan budaya organisasi dan inovasi dengan prestasi koperasi dan faktor penyederhana integrasi strategi di kalangan koperasi di Perak
title_short Kajian hubungan budaya organisasi dan inovasi dengan prestasi koperasi dan faktor penyederhana integrasi strategi di kalangan koperasi di Perak
title_full Kajian hubungan budaya organisasi dan inovasi dengan prestasi koperasi dan faktor penyederhana integrasi strategi di kalangan koperasi di Perak
title_fullStr Kajian hubungan budaya organisasi dan inovasi dengan prestasi koperasi dan faktor penyederhana integrasi strategi di kalangan koperasi di Perak
title_full_unstemmed Kajian hubungan budaya organisasi dan inovasi dengan prestasi koperasi dan faktor penyederhana integrasi strategi di kalangan koperasi di Perak
title_sort kajian hubungan budaya organisasi dan inovasi dengan prestasi koperasi dan faktor penyederhana integrasi strategi di kalangan koperasi di perak
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate 2016
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/6352/1/s811006_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/6352/2/s811006_02.pdf
_version_ 1747828064357711872
spelling my-uum-etd.63522021-04-05T01:40:11Z Kajian hubungan budaya organisasi dan inovasi dengan prestasi koperasi dan faktor penyederhana integrasi strategi di kalangan koperasi di Perak 2016 Adijah, Ayob Ramli, Azahari Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HD58.9 Organizational Effectiveness. The purpose of this study is to investigate the relationships between organizational culture and innovation towards performance of cooperative, with moderating effects of integration strategy. The study was using Balanced Scorecard concepts for measuring cooperative performance due to resources need to be integrated for cooperative improvement. Problems arise when one measure cooperative performance not as a whole and most of research found on cooperative performance is not based on Malaysian contexts. In addition, this study was made for resources involvement in performance improvement and the relationship that may exist. This study using quantitative methods with population among 1373 cooperatives located in Perak, Malaysia. The findings received from only one representative for each cooperative to be tested. The sample size consists of 300 respondents of various backgrounds, various types of cooperatives and still in operation. A total of 124 or 41% completed questionnaires were tested in this study. Finding shows that there is no relationship between between organizational culture and cooperative performance. However, there is a significant relationship between innovation and cooperative performance. The study also found that integration strategy has been moderating the relationship between organizational culture, innovation and cooperative performance. The researcher suggest that future studies should be carried out throughout Malaysia in order to get more accurate findings with more independent variables to be examine. 2016 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/6352/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/6352/1/s811006_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/6352/2/s811006_02.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Angle, H. (1981). An empirical assessment of organisational commitment and organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 26 (1), 1-14. Asan Ali Golam Hassan. (1998). Gerakan koperasi di Malaysia: Peranan dan strategi dalam pembangunan Negara. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Ashu Sharma. (2009). Implementing balance scorecard for performance measurement: Implementing balance scorecard. The Icfai University Press. Ayesha Farooq & Zareen Hussain. (2011). Balanced scorecard perspective on change and performance: A study of selected Indian companies. 7th International Strategic Management Conference. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 24, 754–768. Azahari Ramli, Rushaimi Zein Yusof & Shahimi Mohtar. (2007). Hubungan amalan pergudangan dengan prestasi organisasi pergudangan: Pengenalan kepada kerangka konsep. Universiti Utara Malaysia, 6 (2). Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99-120. Bass, B. M. & Avolio, B. J. (1994). Transformational leadership and organizational culture. International Journal of Public Administration, 17(3&4):541-554. Benos, T., Nikos K. & Frans J.H.M. Verhees. (2007). Greek co-ops’ re-engineering: exploring the influences among organizational attributes, strategic attributes, and performance. Selected Paper Prepared for Presentation at the International Conference on Economics and Management of Networks, EMNet 2007, Rotterdam, The Netherlands, June 28-30, 25. Bose S, Thomas K. (2007). Applying the balanced scorecard for better performance of intellectual capital. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 8 (4), 653-654. Braam, G., Nijssen, E. (2004). Performance effects of using the balance scorecard: A note on the Dutch experience. Long Range Planning, 37 (4), 335–349. Burgelman, R. A. (1983). Amodel of the interaction of strategic behavior, corporate context, and the concept of strategy. Academy of Management Review, 8 (1), 61–70. Chatman, J.and Bersade. (1997). Employee satisfaction, factor associated with company performance, Journal Of Applied Psychology, February, 29-42. Conner, K.R. (1992). A historical comparison of Resource-Based View and five schools of thought within industrial organization economics: Do we have a New Theory of the Firm? Journal of Management; 17 (1), 121–154. Deal T. E. & Kennedy, A. A. (1982, 2000). Corporate Cultures: The Rites and Rituals of Corporate Life, Harmondsworth, Penguin Books, 1982; reissue Perseus Books, 2000. Dechant, K., & Altman, B. (1994). Environmental leadership: from compliance to competitive advantage. Academy of Management Executive, 8 (3), 7–20. Dull, R. & Tegarden, D. (2004). Using control charts to monitor financial reporting of public companies. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 5 (2), 109–127. Ed Mayo. (2012). Co-operative performance: sustainability, accounting, management, and policy. 2 (1). 158-164. Ernita. (2012). Faktor yang mempengaruhi prestasi koperasi menggunakan konsep Balanced Scorecard dengan penyertaan ahli sebagai moderator. Universiti Utara Malaysia. Goffee, R. & Jones, G. (1998). The character of a corporation. Harper Business, London. Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: Organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375–387. Griffith, D. A., Yalcinkaya, G., & Calantone, R. J. (2010). Do marketing capabilities consistently mediate effects of firm intangible capital on performance across institutional environments? Journal of World Business, 45, 217–227. Handfield, R. B., & Bechtel, C. (2002). The role of trust and relationship structure in improving supply chain responsiveness. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, 367-382. Hansen, G. & Wernerfelt, B. (1989). Determinants of firm performance: The relative impact of economic and organizational factors. Strategic Management Journal, 10(3), 399-411. Hasbullah, M. Noor. (2009). Analisis kinerja keuangan pada Koperasi Karyawan PT. Djarum Kudus. Skripsi. Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta. http://www.skm.gov.my/images/images/perundangan/ akta-2/BHG-01-Permulaan.pdf http://www.wisc.edu/uwcc/icic/issues/prin/21-cent/ identity.html. International Cooperative Alliance (ICA) (1995) ICA (1995). International Cooperative Alliance Statement of the co-operative identity. Jenny Poolton & Hossam Ismail. (2000). New developments in innovation. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15 (8), 795-811. Kaplan, R. S. & Norton, D. (1996). Strategic learning & the balanced scorecard. Strategy & Leadership,24(5):18-25. Kaplan, R. S., and D.P. Norton. (1992). Balanced scorecard-measure that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, January – February:71-79. Ketokivi, M., & Schroeder, R. (2004). Manufacturing practice, strategic fit and performance. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 21(2), 171-191. Kilmann, R. H., Saxton, M. J., Serpa, R., & Associates. (1985). Gaining control of the corporate culture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Kiran Jude Fernandesa, Vinesh Rajab & Andrew Whalley. (2006). Lessons from implementing the balanced scorecard in a small and medium size manufacturing organization. Technovation, 26 (2006), 623–634. Lawrence, P. R., & Lorsch, J.W. (1967). Organization and environment: Managing differentiation and integration. Boston: Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration. Lopez, V. A., & Iglesias, S. (2010). A Reputational–Performance Framework in an SME Context: Some Empirical Evidence from Spain. Irish Journal of Management, 29(2), 35-66. Lo, Y.-H. (2012). Managerial Capabilities, Organizational Culture and Organizational Performance: The resource-based perspective in Chinese lodging industry. The Journal of International Management Studies, 7(1), 151-157. Lunenburg, F. C. (2011). Organizational Culture-Performance Relationships: Views of Excellence and Theory Z. National Forum of Educational Administaration and Supervision Journal, 29(4). M. Lebas. (1995). Performance measurement and performance management. International Journal of Production Economics, 41 (1–3), 23–25. Maidique, M.A. & Zirger, B.J. (1985). The New Product Learning Cycle. Res. Policy Massachusette: Allyn and Bacon. Martin, J. (1992). Cultures in Organizations-Three Perspectives. Oxford University Press, Oxford. McDevitt R., Giapponi C. & Solomon N. (2008). Strategy revitalization in academe: A balanced scorecard approach. International Journal of Educational Management; 22 (1), 32-47. Mendenhall et al. (1993). Meta-analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 257-66. Miles, R. E., & Snow, C. C. (1978). Organization strategy, structure, and process. Burr Ridge, IL: McGraw-Hill. Murphy, G.B., J.W. Trailer & R.C. Hill. (1996). Measuring Performance in Entrepreneurship Research. Journal of Business Research, 36, 15-23. Niven P. (2002). Balanced scorecard step-by-step: Maximizing performance and maintaining results. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Nwankwo, U.M., Peters, K.J., & Bokelmann, W. (2009). Can cooperative membership and participation affect adoption decisions? Issues for sustainable biotechnology dissemination. AgBioForum, 12 (3&4), 437-451. Ojo, O. (2010). Organizational Culture and Corporate Performance: Empirical Evidence from Nigeria. Journal of Business Systems, Governance and Ethics, 5(2), 1-12. Paul Foland & Jim Browne (2005). A review of performance measurement: towards performance management. Computers in Industry, 56 (2005), 663–680. Peter Lok John Crawford. (2004). The effect of organisational culture and leadership style on job satisfaction and organisational commitment. Journal of Management Development, 23 (4), 321-338. Peteraf, M. A. (1993). The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A Resource-Based View. Strategic Management Journal, 14 (3), 179–191. Prajogo, D., Sohal, A. (2004). The multidimensionality of TQM practices in determining quality and innovation performance: An empirical examination. Technovation, 24(6), 443–453. Robbins, S. P. (2001). Organizational behavior. Prentice Hall International, Inc. Robert D. Behn (2003). Why measure performance? Different purposes require different measures. Public Administratian Review, September/October 2003, 63 (5). Rodriguez, J. M., & Ventura, J. (2003). Human resource management systems and organizational performance: An analysis of the Spanish manufacturing industry. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 14 (7), 1206-1226. Rogers, E. M. & F. F. Shoemaker. (1971). Communicationof innovations. Second Edition. The Free Press. New York. Ropke, Jochen. (2003). Ekonomi koperasi: Teori dan manajemen. Penerbit: Salemba Empat, Jakarta. Rosenzweig, E. D., Roth, A. V., & Dean, J. W., Jr. (2003). The influence of an integration strategy on competitive capabilities and business performance: An exploratory study of consumer products manufacturers. Journal of Operations Management, 21(4), 437–456. Rumelt, R. P. (1991). How much does industry matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(3), 167–185. Sakakibara, S., Flynn, B. B., Schroeder, R. G., & Morris, W. T. (1997). The impact of justin-time manufacturing and its infrastructure on manufacturing performance. Management Science, 43(9), 1246-1257. Schein, E. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership. 2nd Ed. Jossey-Bass Publishers. San Fransisco. Schumpeter, Joseph. (1989). Essays on entrepreneurs, innovations, business cycles and the evolution of the capitalism, ed. Richard V. Clemence with a new introduction by Richard Swedberg. New York and Oxford: Transaction. Sekaran, U. (2003). Research methods for business: a skill-building approach (4 ed.). Siew Kim Jean & Lee Kelvin Yu. (2004). Corporate culture and organizational performance. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19 (4), 340-359. Simons, R. (2000). Performance measurement and control systems for implementing strategy – text and cases. Eaglewoods Cliff. NS: Prentice Hall. Smircich, L. (1983). Concepts of culture and organisational analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly, 28, 339-58. Soraya, Ainun. (2010). Analisis kinerja keuangan koperasi unit usaha simpan pinjam (studi kasus pada Koperasi Jasa Sejahtera Semarang). Thesis. Universitas Diponegoro, Semarang. Suruhanjaya Koperasi Malaysia (2012). Dasar Koperasi Negara 2010. Suruhanjaya Syarikat Malaysia, Kementerian Perdagangan Dalam Negeri Koperasi dan Kepenggunaan. Swink, M., Narasimhan, R., & Kim, S. W. (2005). Manufacturing practices and strategy integration: Effects on cost efficiency, flexibility, and market based performance. Decision science, 36 (3), 427-457. Thomas D. Kuczmarski. (1996). What is innovation? The art of welcoming risk. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 13 (5), 7-11. Wheelwright, S. C. (1984). Manufacturing strategy: Defining the missing link. Strategic Management Journal, 5 (1), 77–91. Κ. Kostopoulos, Y. E. Spanos, & G. P. Prastacos. The Resource-Based View of the firm and innovation: identification of critical linkages. The 2nd European Academy of Management Conference, Stockholm, May, 2002.

Similar Items