The relationship between 360 degree feedbacks and leadership development

The characteristic of a good leader is one of the important factors in ensuring a company's goals and vision. Accordingly, Petra Energy Berhad also seriously looks into leadership development in the organization. Furthermore, various types of human resource management issues such as high turno...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Suhaila, Mohd Nazer
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng
Published:	2016
Subjects:	HD28-70 Management Industrial Management
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/6366/1/s810985_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6366/2/s810985_02.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.6366
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng
advisor	Mohd Isa, Mohd Faizal
topic	HD28-70 Management Industrial Management
spellingShingle	HD28-70 Management Industrial Management Suhaila, Mohd Nazer The relationship between 360 degree feedbacks and leadership development
description	The characteristic of a good leader is one of the important factors in ensuring a company's goals and vision. Accordingly, Petra Energy Berhad also seriously looks into leadership development in the organization. Furthermore, various types of human resource management issues such as high turnover rate and high number of people to retirement contributed to the desolation quality corporate leaders. Recognizing the problem, Petra Energy Berhad has selected 360 degree feedback as a tool in determining the sustainability leadership development in this company. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify the relationship between a 360-degree feedback and leadership development. This is quantitative research and utilizes questionnaires as a method of collecting data on 120 people in Petra Energy officials directly involved in the use of 360 degree feedback as their leadership development. The results showed that the use of 360-degree feedback related to the development of the quality characteristics of the leader in Petra Energy Berhad. The results of this study also made proposals to strengthen the implementation of 360- degree feedback as a tool in shaping the characteristics of quality leaders.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	masters
qualification_level	Master's degree
author	Suhaila, Mohd Nazer
author_facet	Suhaila, Mohd Nazer
author_sort	Suhaila, Mohd Nazer
title	The relationship between 360 degree feedbacks and leadership development
title_short	The relationship between 360 degree feedbacks and leadership development
title_full	The relationship between 360 degree feedbacks and leadership development
title_fullStr	The relationship between 360 degree feedbacks and leadership development
title_full_unstemmed	The relationship between 360 degree feedbacks and leadership development
title_sort	relationship between 360 degree feedbacks and leadership development
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate	2016
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/6366/1/s810985_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/6366/2/s810985_02.pdf
_version_	1776103687135952896
spelling	my-uum-etd.63662023-03-09T03:05:13Z The relationship between 360 degree feedbacks and leadership development 2016 Suhaila, Mohd Nazer Mohd Isa, Mohd Faizal Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management The characteristic of a good leader is one of the important factors in ensuring a company's goals and vision. Accordingly, Petra Energy Berhad also seriously looks into leadership development in the organization. Furthermore, various types of human resource management issues such as high turnover rate and high number of people to retirement contributed to the desolation quality corporate leaders. Recognizing the problem, Petra Energy Berhad has selected 360 degree feedback as a tool in determining the sustainability leadership development in this company. Therefore, this study was conducted to identify the relationship between a 360-degree feedback and leadership development. This is quantitative research and utilizes questionnaires as a method of collecting data on 120 people in Petra Energy officials directly involved in the use of 360 degree feedback as their leadership development. The results showed that the use of 360-degree feedback related to the development of the quality characteristics of the leader in Petra Energy Berhad. The results of this study also made proposals to strengthen the implementation of 360- degree feedback as a tool in shaping the characteristics of quality leaders. 2016 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/6366/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/6366/1/s810985_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/6366/2/s810985_02.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Allen, J. , Scott & Kusy, Mitchell (2011). The Little Book of Leadership Development: 50 Ways to Bring Out the Leader in Every Employee. Amacom Div American Mgmt Assn. Avolio, J., Bruce (2010). Full Range Leadership Development. SAGE Publication Inc Bearley, William (1996). 360 Degree Feedback: Strategies, Tactics, and Techniques for Developing Leaders. Human Resource Development. 28(2), 246-256 Boatman, Jazmine & Wellins, S., Richard (2011). Malaysia Highlights; Global Leadership Forecast 2011. Development Dimensions International Bolea, Al & Atwater, Leanne(2015). Applied Leadership Development: Nine Elements of Leadership Mastery. Routledge, Brainard, Dean (2011). A Leadership Imperative for the Oil and Gas Industry. The Ken Blanchard Companies. Chemers, M., Martin (1997). An Integrative Theory of Leadership. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Clark-Carter, David (2004). Quantitative Psychological Research: A Student's Handbook. Psychology Press. Creswell , W., John (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. SAGE Publications. DuBrin, Andrew (2012). Leadership: Research Findings, Practice, and Skills. Cengage Learning. Fleenor, W., John & Taylor, Sylvestor & Chappelow, Craig (2008). Leveraging the Impact of 360-degree Feedback. John Wiley & Sons. Fulmer, M., Robert & Goldsmith, Marshall (2001). The Leadership Investment: How the World's Best Organizations Gain Strategic Advantage Through Leadership Development. AMACOM Div American Mgmt Assn Giber, David & Lam, Sam & Goldsmith, Marshall & Bourke, Justin (2009). Linkage Inc's Best Practices in Leadership Development Handbook. Case Studies, Instruments, Trai .Pfeiffer Heifetz, A., Ronald (1994). Leadership Without Easy Answers. Harvard University Press (465). Hennink, M., Monique (2007). International Focus Group Research: A Handbook for the Health and Social Sciences. Cambridge University Press Hubbard, Betsy (2005). Investing In Leadership. Grantmakers for Effective Organizations (1). Keohane, O., Nannerl (2010). Thinking about Leadership. Princeton University Press. Kouzes, M. , James & Posner, Z., Barry (2012). The Leadership Challenge: How to Make Extraordinary Things Happen in Organizations. John Wiley & Sons. Kraus, J. , Aaron & Wilson, N. , Chantale (2012). Leadership Development for Organizational Success. SIOP Visibility Committee, 30(6), 569-581. Lawson, Karen (2008). Leadership Development Basics. American Society for Training and Development. Lepsinger, Richard & Lucia, D., Anntoinette (2009). The Art and Science of 360 Degree Feedback. Jossey-bass London, Manuel (2001). Leadership Development: Paths To Self-insight and Professional Growth. Psychology Press. Marcella, Rita & Rowlands, Hayley(2009). Leadership Voices, Imagining the future of the Oil and gas industry. Robert Gordon University. Martineau, Jennifer & Hoole, Emily & Patterson, Tracy (2009). Management development. EFMD Global Focus (3). Maxwell, A. , Joseph (2012). Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach: An Interactive Approach. SAGE McNabb, E., David (2013). Research Methods in Public Administration and Nonprofit Management: Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches. M.E. Sharpe. Murphy, Elaine, Susan & Riggio, E., Ronald (2003). The Future of Leadership Development. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Ninth Malaysia Plan 2006 – 2010 (2006) . Ninth Malaysia Plan 2006 – 2010. The Economic Planning Unit , Prime Minister's Department Nor Wahizah Andul Wahatb& Krauss, Eric, Steven & Jamilah Othman (2013). Leadership Development through workplace learning in Malaysia Organizatio. Canadian Centre of Science and Education Oracle (2012). Seven Steps for Effective Leadership Development. Oracle Corporation. Pallant, J. (2002). SPSS Survival Manual. Australia: Allen & Unwin.Qubein, N. (2008). Emotional Rewards Are The Bottom Line These Days. Retrieved from http://hrpeople.monster.com/news/ articles/1446-emotional-rewards-are-thebottom- line-these-days Rao, T V & Rao, Raju & Mahapatra, Gopal & Chawla, Nandini (2004). 360 Degree Feedback & Performance Management System. Excel Books India (2) Rao, T V & Rao, Raju (2005). The Power of 360 Degree Feedback: Maximizing Managerial and Leadership Effectiveness. SAGE. Rao, T. V. & Rao, Raju (2014). The Power of 360 Degree Feedback: The India Way for Leadership Effectiveness. SAGE Publications India. Roa, TV & Chawla, Nandini (2005). 360 Degree Feedback and Assessment and Development Centres. Anurag Jain for Excel Books. Rosenbach, E. & Taylor, Robert & Youndt , A., Mark (2012). Contemporary Issues in Leadership. Westview Press. Rost, Clarence, Joseph(1993). Leadership for the Twenty-first Century. Greenwood Publishing Group. Ryan, Rosemary (2009). Leadership Development. Routledge. Salkind, J. ,Neil (2010). Encyclopedia of Research Design. SAGE Publications India. Shaik Roslinah Bux , Hafiza Atha Ahmad and Haslizayanti Othman (2009). Talent Management at Government Linked Companies (GLCs). Malaysia Productivity Corporation. Sharma, K., J. (2012). Business Statistics. Pearson Education India. Sharpe, Cat (1998). 360-Degree Feedback System. American Society for Training and Development. Shaver, Warren (1998). 360-Degree Feedback System. American Society for Training and Development. Spector, E. ,Paul(1981). Research Designs. SAGE Publications India. Taylor, Bill & Sinha, Gautam & Ghoshal, Taposh (2006). Research Methodology: A Guide To For Reseachers In Management And Social Sciences. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd. Townsend, Tony & MacBeath, John (2011). International Handbook of Leadership for Learning. Springer Science & Business Media. Velsor, Van, Ellen & McCauley, D., Cynthia & Ruderman , N., Marian (2010). The Center for Creative Leadership Handbook of Leadership Development. Centre for Creative Leadership. Ward, Peter (1997). 360-degree Feedback. CIPD Publishing. Wart, Van, Montgomery (2014). Dynamics of Leadership in Public Service: Theory and Practice. Routledge. Weinberg, Lawner, Sharon & Abramowitz, Knapp, Sarah (2002). Data Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences Using SPSS. Cambridge University Press. Weinberg, Lawner, Sharon & Abramowitz, Knapp, Sarah (2008). Statistics Using SPSS: An Integrative Approach. Cambridge University Press. Zentis, Rehbine, L., Nancy (2007) Contribution Of 360-Degree Feedback to Leadership Development. ProQuest Information and Learning Company

The relationship between 360 degree feedbacks and leadership development

Similar Items