Relationship between effectivess of political system and good governance practices: A case study in Alor Setar

Relationship between effectivess of political system and good governance practices: A case study in Alor Setar

Governance is a major problem in the reform of state administration. Good governance can give meaning and implications of the different within an administration and has developed among the developing countries where the political system is stable and has a competitive market. There are various views...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Syarifah Nadiah, Syed Abdul Wahab
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2015
Subjects:
JQ Political institutions and public administration (Asia)
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/6525/1/s815263_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/6525/2/s815263_02.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.6525
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Arshad, Rozita
topic JQ Political institutions and public administration (Asia)
spellingShingle JQ Political institutions and public administration (Asia)
Syarifah Nadiah, Syed Abdul Wahab
Relationship between effectivess of political system and good governance practices: A case study in Alor Setar
description Governance is a major problem in the reform of state administration. Good governance can give meaning and implications of the different within an administration and has developed among the developing countries where the political system is stable and has a competitive market. There are various views on governance Rhodes, 2007 (in Anne Mette Kjaer, 2011) believes that good governance is categorized into three main dimensions. First, the dimension of political processes and governance aspect of the legality of government, the political element of government accountable and responsible, respect for human rights and the rule of law (Caluser & Weber, 2007). Despite various efforts and measures taken by the government, but the perception of good and excellent of governance Malaysia is still at an unsatisfactory level. Accordingly, the study will examine the relationship of the political system and governance as a research problem. Thus, the research is to find the perception of relationship between effectiveness of political system and good governance practices in the administrative of Kedah which focuses in Alor Setar
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Syarifah Nadiah, Syed Abdul Wahab
author_facet Syarifah Nadiah, Syed Abdul Wahab
author_sort Syarifah Nadiah, Syed Abdul Wahab
title Relationship between effectivess of political system and good governance practices: A case study in Alor Setar
title_short Relationship between effectivess of political system and good governance practices: A case study in Alor Setar
title_full Relationship between effectivess of political system and good governance practices: A case study in Alor Setar
title_fullStr Relationship between effectivess of political system and good governance practices: A case study in Alor Setar
title_full_unstemmed Relationship between effectivess of political system and good governance practices: A case study in Alor Setar
title_sort relationship between effectivess of political system and good governance practices: a case study in alor setar
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government
publishDate 2015
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/6525/1/s815263_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/6525/2/s815263_02.pdf
_version_ 1747828084335181824
spelling my-uum-etd.65252021-04-05T01:30:00Z Relationship between effectivess of political system and good governance practices: A case study in Alor Setar 2015 Syarifah Nadiah, Syed Abdul Wahab Arshad, Rozita Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government Ghazali Shafie Graduate School of Government JQ Political institutions and public administration (Asia) Governance is a major problem in the reform of state administration. Good governance can give meaning and implications of the different within an administration and has developed among the developing countries where the political system is stable and has a competitive market. There are various views on governance Rhodes, 2007 (in Anne Mette Kjaer, 2011) believes that good governance is categorized into three main dimensions. First, the dimension of political processes and governance aspect of the legality of government, the political element of government accountable and responsible, respect for human rights and the rule of law (Caluser & Weber, 2007). Despite various efforts and measures taken by the government, but the perception of good and excellent of governance Malaysia is still at an unsatisfactory level. Accordingly, the study will examine the relationship of the political system and governance as a research problem. Thus, the research is to find the perception of relationship between effectiveness of political system and good governance practices in the administrative of Kedah which focuses in Alor Setar 2015 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/6525/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/6525/1/s815263_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/6525/2/s815263_02.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Anderson, R.C., Mansi, S.A., Reeb, D.M., 2004. Board characteristics, accounting report integrity, and the cost of debt. Journal of Accounting and Economics 37 (3): 315–342. Appelbaum, S., Vigneault, L., Walker, E. & Shapiro, B. 2009.(Good) corporate governance and the strategic integration of meso ethics. Social Responsibility Journal 5(4): 525-539. Ashbaugh, H., Johnstone, K.M. & Warfield, T.D. 1999. Corporate reporting on the internet, Accounting Horizons 13(3): 241-258. Bliss, M and Balachandran, J. 2003. CEO Duality, Audit Committee Independence and Voluntarydisclosures in Malaysia. Paper presented at the International Conference on Quality FinancialReporting and Corporate Governance-Building Public Trust, Integrity and Accountability. KualaLumpur, Malaysia: 1-27. Chau, K.G. &Gray, J.S. 2002. Ownership structure and corporate voluntary disclosure in Hong Kong and Singapore. The International Journal of Accounting 37: 247-265. Chiang, H., 2005. An Empirical Study of Corporate Governance and Corporate Performance. Journalof American Academy of Busines6: 95-101. Claessens, S & Fan, JPH 2002. Corporate governance in Asia: A survey. International Review ofFinance3(2): 71-103. Cooper, S. 2004. Corporate Social Performance: A Stakeholder Approach. England: Ashgate Publishing Limited. Finance Committee on Corporate Governance. 1999. Report On Code Of Corporate Governance. Kuala Lumpur: Securities Commission. Cooper,D.R.& Schindler,P.S.2003.Business Research methods. Ed. Ke-8. New York USA:The Mc Graw Hill Companies, Inc. Creswell, J. 1994. Research design qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publication. Daniel E.I Gberevbie & Stephen A. Lafenwa, 2007. Political Culture and good governance in Nigeria. Ago-Iwoye of Social and Behaviour Journal Sciences: Vol 2, No. 1 David Easton, 1957. An approach to the analysis of political system. World Politics Vol. 9: 383-400. The John Hopkins University Press Earnings in East Asia. Journal of Accounting and Economics 33:401-425. Ettredge, M., Richardson, V.J. &Scolz, S. 2002. Dissemination of information for investors at corporate web sites. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 21: 357-369. Fan, J. and T. Wong, 2002. Corporate Ownership Structure and Informativeness of Accounting. Fisher, J. 2004. Social responsibility and ethics clarifying the concepts. Journal of Business Ethics 52: 391-400. Gabriel Abraham Almond & James Smoot Coleman, 1970. The politics of developing areas. Princeton University Press: New Jersey. Gaskell, G. 2000.Individual and group interview. In Qualitative Researching With Text, Image And Sound, edited by. G. Bauer, G. London: Sage Publication. Gibson, M.S., 2003. Is Corporate Governance Ineffective in Emerging Markets? Journal of Financial and governance and board effectiveness.”,Journal of financial and Quantitative Analysis 38(1):231-250. Goran Hyden, Kenneth Mease, Marta Foresti& Verna Fritz, 2008. Governance assessments for local stakeholders: What the world governance offers. Woking Paper Overseas Development Institute III, Westmister. Gray, S. J. 1988. Towards a theory of cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally. Abacus 24(1): 1–15. Gul, F. A., & Leung, S. 2004. Board leadership, outside directors’ expertise and voluntary corporate disclosures. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 23: 351–379. Hambrick, D.C. and P.A. Mason, 1984. Upper Echelons: The Organisation as a Reflection of its Top Managers. Academy of Management Review 9(2): 193-206. Haniffa, R.M. & Cooke, T.E. (2002) Culture, corporate governance and disclosure in Malaysia corporations, Abacus 38: 317-349. Hashim, H.A. & Devi, S 2008. Board characteristics, ownership structure and earnings quality: Malaysian evidence. Research in Accounting in Emerging Economies 8: 97-123. Healy, P. &Palepu, K. 1993. The effect of firms’ financial disclosure strategies on stock prices. Accounting Horizons 7: 1-11. Ho, S.S.M., Wong, K.S., 2001. A study of the relationship between corporate governance structures and the extent of voluntary disclosure. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 10: 139–156. Hyden, G &Elgstrom, 2002. Development and democracy. What have we learned and how? Journal of Routledge, London. Hyungwook, Y.,Hangjung Z. & Andrew, P.C. 2011. Does XBRY adoption reduce information asymmetry? Journal of Business Research 64 (2). Ibrahim, H & Abdul Samad, F 2011. Corporate governance mechanisms and performance of public listed family ownership n Malaysia. International Journal of Economics and Finance . 3(1):105-115. Jensen, M.C., &Meckling, W. H. ,1976. Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics 3: 305–360. Mahmood Nazar Mohamed danSabithaMarican, 1995. HubunganManusiaDalamOrganisasi. Kuala Lumpur :Utusan Publications & Distributors Sdn. Bhd. Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance. 2000. Kuala Lumpur: Securities Commission. Malaysian Code of Corporate Governance: Revised. 2007. Kuala Lumpur: Securities Commission. Monica Caluser, Mariana Salagean. 2007.Good Governance in Multiethnic Communities: Conditions, Instruments, Best Practices, Ways to Achieve and Measure Good Governance at the Local Level.Ethnocultural Diversity Resource Center. Indiana Universit. Payne, D. & Landry, B. 2005. Similarities in business and IT professional ethics: the need for and development of a comprehensive code of ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 62(1): 73-85. Uma Sekaran, 1992. Research method for business: A skill-building approach. John Wiley & Sons INC, Southern Illinois University SuruhanjayaSekuriti Malaysia. (2000). Jawatankuasa Kewangan Tadbir Urus Korporat. Mohammad Diah Haji. 2010. Pembudayaan Integriti – Isu dan Cabaran dalam Politik – Isu-Isu Integriti 2000 – 2008. Utusan Publications and Distributers. UcapanPelantikanSebagaiKetua Hakim Negara Malaysia Yang KeduaBelas, 29 Oktober 2008). Laporan HakAsasi Manusia. 2010.

Similar Items