Negotiation in Islamic financial system: developing a Shariah-compliant negotiation model

A number of organizations have adopted the Islamic system of management to manage their organizations. Those Islamic organizations negotiate and deal in order to satisfy their interest and meet their objectives. Hence, it is important to know the Shariah principles, which they execute in their negot...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ramdani, Abbas
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2017
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/6984/1/s94620_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/6984/2/s94620_02.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.6984
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Mohammed, Rosli
Ahmad, Mohd. Khairie
topic BP174 The practice of Islam
HG Finance
spellingShingle BP174 The practice of Islam
HG Finance
Ramdani, Abbas
Negotiation in Islamic financial system: developing a Shariah-compliant negotiation model
description A number of organizations have adopted the Islamic system of management to manage their organizations. Those Islamic organizations negotiate and deal in order to satisfy their interest and meet their objectives. Hence, it is important to know the Shariah principles, which they execute in their negotiation with their various customers and stakeholders. The negotiation process and outcome have been largely studied applying different conventional perspectives and value systems. However, while the extant studies on negotiation have exhaustively focused on viewpoints that are mainly informed by western value systems, it is imperative to explore the possibility of the conceptualization and practice of negotiation from the Islamic perspective. As such, this study explores and identifies the concept, principles and practices of negotiation from an Islamic perspective. Additionally, this study proposes a Shariah-compliant negotiation model through a qualitative research design. A series of in-depth face-to-face interview were conducted among 20 informants from four different expert groups namely; Muftis, Academicians, Practitioners and Shariah Board Members of Islamic Banks. Content analysis was used via thematic Data analysis with the assistance of NVivo 8 software. Findings show that negotiations from the Islamic viewpoint provide three platforms of disagreements; reconciliation (Sulh), discussion (Shura) and communication. These platforms are based on six core principles, which are Qur’an and Sunnah compliance, justice, credibility, flexibility, information disclosure and relationship. This study also finds that obtaining spiritual satisfaction is the main purpose for adopting the Islamic approach by Islamic organizations in their negotiation conducts. Furthermore, this study recommends a Shariah-compliant negotiation model as a potential guide for conducting negotiations among Islamic organizations. Finally, this study contributes to the body of knowledge by providing a systematic framework, which provides insights for Islamic organizations on how to conduct negotiations with a proper Islamic approach.
format Thesis
qualification_name Ph.D.
qualification_level Doctorate
author Ramdani, Abbas
author_facet Ramdani, Abbas
author_sort Ramdani, Abbas
title Negotiation in Islamic financial system: developing a Shariah-compliant negotiation model
title_short Negotiation in Islamic financial system: developing a Shariah-compliant negotiation model
title_full Negotiation in Islamic financial system: developing a Shariah-compliant negotiation model
title_fullStr Negotiation in Islamic financial system: developing a Shariah-compliant negotiation model
title_full_unstemmed Negotiation in Islamic financial system: developing a Shariah-compliant negotiation model
title_sort negotiation in islamic financial system: developing a shariah-compliant negotiation model
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
publishDate 2017
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/6984/1/s94620_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/6984/2/s94620_02.pdf
_version_ 1747828140658393088
spelling my-uum-etd.69842021-08-18T05:47:05Z Negotiation in Islamic financial system: developing a Shariah-compliant negotiation model 2017 Ramdani, Abbas Mohammed, Rosli Ahmad, Mohd. Khairie Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences BP174 The practice of Islam HG Finance A number of organizations have adopted the Islamic system of management to manage their organizations. Those Islamic organizations negotiate and deal in order to satisfy their interest and meet their objectives. Hence, it is important to know the Shariah principles, which they execute in their negotiation with their various customers and stakeholders. The negotiation process and outcome have been largely studied applying different conventional perspectives and value systems. However, while the extant studies on negotiation have exhaustively focused on viewpoints that are mainly informed by western value systems, it is imperative to explore the possibility of the conceptualization and practice of negotiation from the Islamic perspective. As such, this study explores and identifies the concept, principles and practices of negotiation from an Islamic perspective. Additionally, this study proposes a Shariah-compliant negotiation model through a qualitative research design. A series of in-depth face-to-face interview were conducted among 20 informants from four different expert groups namely; Muftis, Academicians, Practitioners and Shariah Board Members of Islamic Banks. Content analysis was used via thematic Data analysis with the assistance of NVivo 8 software. Findings show that negotiations from the Islamic viewpoint provide three platforms of disagreements; reconciliation (Sulh), discussion (Shura) and communication. These platforms are based on six core principles, which are Qur’an and Sunnah compliance, justice, credibility, flexibility, information disclosure and relationship. This study also finds that obtaining spiritual satisfaction is the main purpose for adopting the Islamic approach by Islamic organizations in their negotiation conducts. Furthermore, this study recommends a Shariah-compliant negotiation model as a potential guide for conducting negotiations among Islamic organizations. Finally, this study contributes to the body of knowledge by providing a systematic framework, which provides insights for Islamic organizations on how to conduct negotiations with a proper Islamic approach. 2017 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/6984/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/6984/1/s94620_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/6984/2/s94620_02.pdf text eng public Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia The Noble Qur’an (2000). Al-Madinah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: King Fahd Complex for the Printing the Holy Qur’an Abdu al-Ati, H. (1997). Islam In focus. Cairo, Egypt: Al-Falah Foundation Translation, Publication and Distribution. Abdul Malik, O. L., & Muda, F. S. B. (2015). The Concept of Reconciliation (Sulh) in Islamic Family Law and Matrimonial Dispute Settlement Practice in Nigeria. Peak Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(1), 1-7. Abdul Rahim, A. B. (2013). Understanding Islamic Ethics and its Significance on the Character Building. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 3(6), 508-513. Abid, A. A. (2015). Concept of Islamic Unity and its Role in Development. World Assembly 28 for Proximity of Islamic Schools of Thought. Tehran, Iran: Retrieved on 05/03/2016, from http://taghrib.org/pages/content.php?tid=225. Ahmad, F., Muhammad, M. B., & Abdullah, A. A. (2011). Religion and Spirituality in Coping with Advanced Breast Cancer: Perspectives from Malaysian Muslim Women. Journal of Religion and Health, 50(1), 36-45. Ahmad, M., & Khan, S. (2016). A Model of Spirituality for Ageing Muslims. Journal of Religion and Health, 55(3), 830-843. Ahmad, M. B. (2009). The Influence of Culture on Malay Muslím Business Practice: A Case Study of Malaysia With Special Reference to the State of Kelantan Dar al-Na'im. Doctoral Dissertation, The University of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Ahmad, M. K. (2010). Islamic Persuasive Communication: Concepts, Characteristics, and Impacts of Media Health Programs. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Queensland, Australia. Ahmat, N., & Akdogan, C. (2012). Trust (Al-Amanah): A Comparative Study of its Application in Islamic and Western Science. Paper presented at the The Asian Conference on Ethics, Religion & Philosophy Osaka, Japan. Al-Bugha, M. D. (1999). Athar Al-Adillat Al-Mukhtalif Fiha (Masadir Al-Tashri Al-Taba'iyyah) fi Al-Fiqh Al-Islami. Damshiq, Syria: Dar Al-Imam Al-Bukhari. Al-Karmi, H. (1964). The Prophet Muhammad and the Spirit of Compromise. Islamic Quarterly, 8(3), 89-94. Al-Muala, A. (2007). What is the Sunnah ? : A Revelation like the Quran. Retrieved on 12/04/2015, from https://www.islamreligion.com/ articles/653/what-is-Sunnah-part-1/. Al-Nawan, A. A.-A. (2012). Our Morals Following the Prophet‟s Path. Retrieved on 17/08/2015, from https://d1.islamhouse.com/data/en/ih_books/ single2/enOur_Morals_Following_the_Prophet_Path. pdf. Al-Qaradawi, Y. (1999). The Lawful and the Prohibited in Islam (2 ed.). Cairo, Egypt: Al-Falah Foundation, Translation, Publication and Distribution. Al-Tirmidhi, M. B. I. (1933). Kitab Al-Jami'e al-Sahih Sunan al-Tirmidhi, Edited by; Ahmad Muhammad Shakir. Beirut, Lebanon: Dar Ihya at-urath al-arabi. Al-Zuhaili, W. (2003). Negotiation in Islam. Laxenburg, Austria: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis. Alavoine, C. (2012). You Can‟t Always Get What You Want: Strategic Issues in Negotiation. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 665-672. Ali, M. M. (2014). Issues in Islamization of Human Knowledge: Civilization Building Discourse on Contemporary Muslim Thinkers (1 ed.). Gombak, Malaysia: IIUM Press. Alikhani, A. A. (2011). Strategies for Peaceful Coexistence in Islam. International Proceedings of Economics Development and Research, 10, 461-468. Alpa, G. (2010). General Principles of Law. Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law, 1(1), 1-39. Alwani, T. J. (2015). The Ethics of Disagreement in Islam. Virginia, USA: International Institute of Islamic Thought (IIIT). Az-Zarqa, M. A. (1999). Worship In Islam. Gassim, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Foreigners Guidance Center Azar, A., Khosravani, F., & Jalali, R. (2014). Drama Theory: A Problem Structuring Method in Soft or (A Practical Application: Nuclear Negotiations Analysis Between Islamic Republic of Iran and the 5+ 1 group). The International Journal of Humanities, 19(4), 1-14. Bartos, O. J. (1977). Simple Model of Negotiation: A Sociological Point of View. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21(4), 565-579. Basharat, T. (2009). The Characteristic Features of Worship as Propounded by Islam (An Analytical Study). Al-Azwa, 24, 27-41. Basit, T. (2003). Manual or Electronic? The Role of Coding in Qualitative Data Analysis. Educational Research, 45(2), 143-154. Baxter, L. A., & babbie, E. (2004). The Basics of Communication Research. Canada: Thomson Wadsworth. Bello, S. i. A. A. (2012). The Role of Justice in Islam. SSRN, Retrieved on 15/5/2014 from http://ssrn.com/abstract=2183623. Boehm, B., & Kitapci, H. (2006). The WinWin Approach: Using a Requirements Negotiation Tool for Rationale Capture and Use. In A. H. Dutoit, R. McCall, I. Mistrik & B. Paech (Eds.), Rationale Management in Software Engineering (pp. 173-190). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting In-Depth Interview : A Guide for Designing and Conducting In-Depth Interviews for Evaluation Input. Watertown, USA Pathfinder International. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101. Bryant, J. (2007). Drama Theory: Dispelling the Myths. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 58(5), 602-613. Bryman, A. (2012). Social Research Methods. New York, USA: Oxford University Press. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Social Paradigms and Organizational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. Burlington, USA: Ashgale Publishing. Butler, J. K. (1999). Trust Expectations, Information Sharing, Climate of Trust, and Negotiation Effectiveness and Efficiency. Group & Organization Management, 24(2), 217-238. Campbell, N. C., Graham, J. L., Jolibert, A., & Meissner, H. G. (1988). Marketing Negotiations in France, Germany, the United Kingdom, and the United States. The Journal of Marketing, 52(2), 49-62. Cascio, W. F., & Aguinis, H. (2005). Applied Psychology in Human Resource Management (6th ed.). USA: Pearson Prentice Hall. Clark, V. L. P., & Creswell, J. W. (2015). Understanding Research: A Consumer's Guide (2 ed.). USA: Pearson Education, Inc. Coddington, A. (1968). Theories of the Bargaining Process. USA: Aldine Pub. Co. Cohen, J. R. (2001). When People are the Means: Negotiating with Respect. Georgetown Journal of Legal Ethics, 14(3), 739-802. Cohen, J. R. (2002). The Ethics of Respect in Negotiation. Negotiation Journal, 18(2), 115-120. Commitee of Scholars. (2007). The Foundations of Faith in the Light of the Qur’an and the Sunnah (A.-R. a. A.-M. Alaro, Trans.). Al-Madinah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: King Fahd Complex for the Printing the Holy Qur’an. Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons, and Evaluative Criteria. Qualitative Sociology, 13(1), 3-21. Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (2 ed.). USA: Sage Publications, Inc. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (3 ed.). USA: Sage Publications.Inc. Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (4 ed.). USA: Pearson. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (4 ed.). USA: Sage publications, Inc. Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2007). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research. USA: Sage Publications, Inc. Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining Validity in Qualitative Inquiry. Theory Into Practice, 39(3), 124-130. Cross, J. G. (1977). Negotiation as a Learning Process. The Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21(4), 581-606. Čulo, K., & Skendrović, V. (2012). Communication in The Process of Negotiation. Informatologia, 45(4), 323-327 Danka, M. M. Y. (2009). The Authority of Sunnah & Hadith in the Light of the Holy Qur’an. London, UK: Khatme Nubuwwat Academy. Deetz, S. A. (1997). Communication in the Age of Negotiation. Journal of Communication, 47(4), 118-134. Deutsch, M. (1949). An Experimental Study of the Effects of Co-operation and Competition upon Group Process. Human Relations, 2(3), 199-231. Dusuki, A. W., & Abdullah, N. I. (2007). Maqasid al-shari'ah, Maslahah and Corporate Social Responsibility. The American Journal of Islamic Social Sciences (AJISS), 24(1), 25-45. El Ghasseyn, A. (2009). The Islamic Bulletin. Retrieved on 22/09/2014, from, http://www.islamicbulletin.org/beliefs.html# sharia. Elkins, D. N., Hedstrom, L. J., Hughes, L. L., Leaf, J. A., & Saunders, C. (1988). Toward a Humanistic-Phenomenological Spirituality Definition, Description, and Measurement. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 28(4), 5-18. Elvan, S., Faridl Noor, H., Muhammad, F., Issa, Q., Muhammad Majdy, A., & Muhammad Ridhwan Ab, A. (2014). Maslahah as an Islamic Source and its Application in Financial Transactions. Journal of Research in Humanities and Social Science, 2(5), 66-71. Emerick, Y. (2004). The Complete Idiot's Guide to Understanding Islam. USA: Alpha, A Pearson Education Company. Farazmand, F. A., Tu, Y.-T., & Daneefard, H. (2011). Is Religious Culture a Factor in Negotiation: A Cross-Cultural Comparison of Iran, Taiwan and the United States. Journal of International Business Research, 10(1), 27-44. Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1991). Getting to Yes: Negotiating an Agreement Without Giving in (2 ed.). New York, USA: Penguin Books. Flick, U. (2007). Designing Qualitative Research. USA: Sage Publications Fusch, P. I., & Ness, L. R. (2015). Are We There Yet? Data Saturation in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 20(9), 1408-1416. Ghalwash, A. A. (1966). The Religion of Islam (A Standard Book) (Vol. 1). The University of Virginia, USA: Supreme Council for Islamic Affairs. Ghanim, F. M., & Fatima, F. A. (2009). Negotiation Ethics. Irbid, Jordan: Al-Kindi House for Publishing and Distribution. Ghorbani, N., Watson, P., Geranmayepour, S., & Chen, Z. (2014). Measuring Muslim Spirituality: Relationships of Muslim Experiential Religiousness with Religious and Psychological Adjustment in Iran. Journal of Muslim Mental Health, 8(1), 77-94. Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding Reliability and Validity in Qualitative Research. The Qualitative Report, 8(4), 597-606. Graham, J. L., Mintu, A. T., & Rodgers, W. (1994). Explorations of Negotiation Behaviors in Ten Foreign Cultures Using a Model Developed in the United States. Management Science, 40(1), 72-95. Guba, E. G. (1981). Criteria for Assessing the Trustworthiness of Naturalistic Inquiries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 29(2), 75-91. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1994). Competing Paradigms in Qualitative Research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research (pp. 105-117). Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage. Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How Many Interviews are Enough? An Experiment with Data Saturation and Variability. Field Methods, 18(1), 59-82. Hall, R. (2012). Mixed Methods: In Search of a Paradigm. Vortrag. Retrieved on 10/10/2013 from, http://www.auamii.com/proceedings_Phuket_2012/ Hall.pdf. Haneef, S. (2002). What Everyone Should Know About Islam and Muslims. New Delhi, India: Islamic Book Service. Hassan, M. K. (2013). Islamization of Human Knowledge. In M. N. Baron, M. M. M. Yusop, M. A. Haneef & M. O. Muhammed (Eds.), Islamic Economics Education in Southeast Asian Universities (pp. 13-50). Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Centre for Islamic Economics, International Islamic University Malaysia. Hopmann, P. T. (1995). Two Paradigms of Negotiation: Bargaining and Problem Solving. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 542(1), 24-47. Hopmann, P. T. (1998). The Negotiation Process and the Resolution of International Conflicts. USA: University of South Carolina Press. Howard, N. (1994a). Drama Theory and its Relation to Game Theory. Part 1: Dramatic Resolution vs. Rational Solution. Group Decision and Negotiation, 3(2), 187-206. Howard, N. (1994b). Drama Theory and its Relation to Game Theory. Part 2: Formal Model of the Resolution Process. Group Decision and Negotiation, 3(2), 207-235. Ibn Kathir, A. A.-F. I. (2003). Tafsir Ibn Kathir (Abridged); By a Group of Scholars Under the Supervision of Shaykh Safiur- Rahman Al-Mubarakpuri (2 ed. Vol. 1-10). Riyad, Kindom of Saudi Aradia: Darussalam. Imam Al-Bukhari, M. I. I. (2009). Sahih Bukhari; Translated to English by: M. Muhsin Khan. Retrieved on 19/03/2014, from www.islamspirit.com. Imam Kamil, M. (2006). Worship in Islam (part 1of3) the Meaning of Worship. Retrieved on 06/05/2014, from http://www.islamreligion.com/ articles/222/worship-in-islam-part-1. Imam Muslim, I. A.-H. (2009). Sahih Muslim; Translated to English by: M. Muhsin Khan. Retrieved on 19/03/2014, from www.islamspirit.com. Islamic House. (2013). Justice in Islam. Retrieved on 11/07/2016, from www.islamreligion.com. Jalil, A. (2006). The Significances of Maslahah Concept and Doctrine of Maqasid (Objectives) Al-Shari‟ah in Project Evaluation. The Journal of Muamalat and Islamic Finance Research (JMIFR), 3(1), 171-202. Jensen, K. B. (2012). A Handbook of Media and Communication Research Qualitative Quantitative Methodologies. London, UK: Routledge. Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Vol. 49). USA: Princeton University Press. Jilani, B. T. M., Hazem, Z., Ishak, A., Mustaffa, S., Faisal, A. Y., Mohd Yakub, Z. M. R., . . . Mohd Murshidi, M. (2012). National Unity and Development from Islamic Point of Views. Middle-East Journal of Scientific Research, 12(6), 767-773. Jonsson, C. (1983). A Cognitive Approach to International Negotiation. European Journal of Political Research 11(2), 139-150. Jonsson, C., & Hall, M. (2003). Communication: An Essential Aspect of Diplomacy. International Studies Perspectives, 4(2), 195-210. Jordan, J. S., Peek, J., & Rosengren, E. S. (2000). The Market Reaction to the Disclosure of Supervisory Actions: Implications for Bank Transparency. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 9(3), 298-319. Kamaruzaman, K. O. (2007). Understanding Islam: Contemporary Discourse. Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: Saba Islamic Media. Keyton, J. (2015). Communication Research Asking Question, Finding Answers (4 ed.). New York, USA: McGraw Hill Education. Khan, K. A. (2011). The Concept of Tolerance in Islam. Retrieved on 20/05/2016, from http://www.milligazette.com/news/1761-the-concept-of-tolerance-inislam. Kissinger, H. A. (1969). The Viet Nam Negotiations. Foreign Affairs, 47(2), 211-234. Klein, G., Feltovich, P. J., Bradshaw, J. M., & Woods, D. D. (2005). Common Ground and Coordination in Joint Activity. In W. B. Rouse & K. R. Boff (Eds.), Organizational Simulation (pp. 139-184). Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Kochan, T. A., & Lipsky, D. B. (2003). Conceptual Foundations: Walton and McKersie's Subprocesses of Negotiations. Cornell University Press. Krauss, S. E. (2005). Research Paradigms and Meaning Making: A Primer. The Qualitative Report, 10(4), 758-770. Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. USA: University of Chicago Press. Lange, A., Löschel, A., Vogt, C., & Ziegler, A. (2010). On the Self-Interested Use of Equity in International Climate Negotiations. European Economic Review, 54(3), 359-375. Langovic-Milicevic, A., Cvetkovski, T., & Langovic, Z. (2011). Negotiation and Globalization. Annals of Engineering Hunedoara, 9(3), 131-136. LeVeck, B. L., Hughes, D. A., Fowler, J. H., Hafner-Burton, E., & Victor, D. G. (2014). The Role of Self-Interest in Elite Bargaining. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(52), 18536-18541. Leventhal, A. G. (2003). Convergence: New Directions in Islamic Finance? Paper presented at the Arab Financial Forum, London, UK. Lewicki, R., Saunders, D., & Barry, B. (2010). Negotiation (6th ed.). USA: McGraw-Hill Higher Education. Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Minton, J. W. (1999). Negotiation. USA: McGraw-Hill Higher Education. Li, J., & Labig, C. E. (2001). Negotiating with China: Exploratory Study of Relationship-Building. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13(3), 345-359. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage Publications, Inc. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2013). The Constructivist Credo. Walnut Creek, USA: Left Coast Press, Inc. Mababaya, N. D. (1998). Da'wah According to the Qura'an and the Sunnah. Riyadth, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: Darussalam Publisher & Distributors. Mahdi, A. R. (2006). The Virtue of Truthfulness (part 1 of 2): The Status and Reward of Truthfulness. Retrieved on 20/4/2016, from http://www.islamreligion.com/articles/424. Mahmoud, M. G. (2002). Communication in the Early Islamic Era: A Social and Historical Analysis. Intellectual Discourse, 10(1), 61-75. Majid, K. (2015). Ikhtilaf and Unity in Muslim Ummah: A Comparative Analysis. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention, 4(3), 10-16. Maktabdar, A. (2014). Sincerity for the Sake of God. Message of Thaqalayn, Translated by Mohammad Javad Shomali, 14(04), 25-46. Malik, M. F.-i.-A. (1992). What is Islam? : Retrieved on 23/02/2014 from www.islamicbulletin.com. Marzband, R., Hosseini, S. H., & Hamzehgardeshi, Z. (2016). A Concept Analysis of Spiritual Care Based on Islamic Sources. Religions, 7(6), 1-11. Maududi, S. A. A. l. (1960). Towards Understanding Islam. Lahore, Pakistan: U.K.I.M Dawah Center. Mawardi, A. b. M. (1981). Tashil u Nnazar wa Taa’jil ul Zafar fil Akhlaqe al Mulk wa Siyahsatul Mulk. Beirut, Lebanon: Daru Nnhza Al Arabia. Mayhew, M. J. (2004). Exploring the Essence of Spirituality: A Phenomenological Study of Eight Students with Eight Different Worldviews. NASPA Journal, 41(4), 647-674. Menkel-Meadow, C. (1983). Toward Another View of Legal Negotiation: The Structure of Problem Solving. Ucla L. Rev., 31, 754-482. Mohammed, J. A. (2007). Corporate Social Responsibility in Islam. Doctoral Dissertation, Auckland University of Technology, New Zealand. Morgan, D. L. (2007). Paradigms Lost and Pragmatism Regained Methodological Implications of Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Methods. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 48-76. Morse, J. M. (1995). The Significance of Saturation. Qualitative Health Research, 5(2), 147-149. Muhammad Taqi-ud-Din, A.-H., & Muhammad Muhsin, K. (2000). Translation of the Meanings of The Noble Qur’an in the English Language. Al-Madinah, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia: King Fahd Complex for the Printing the Holy Qur’an Nawawi, I. (2006). Garden of the Righteous (Reyadh as-Salihin) (M. Z. Khan, Trans.). London, UK: Corson Press Ltd. Nestoroska, I., & Petrovska, I. (2014). Staff Training in Hospitality Sector as Benefit for Improved Service Quality. Opatija, Croatia: University of Rijeka, Faculty of Tourism and Hospitality Management. Neuman, L. W. (2014). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches (7 ed.). USA: Pearson Education Limited. Niedźwiecki, M., Rzecki, K., & Cetnarowicz, K. (2013). Complex Negotiations in the Conclusion and Realisation of the Contract. Procedia Computer Science, 18, 1525-1534. Nieuwmeijer, L. (1992). Negotiation: Methodology and Training. Pretoria, South Africa: HSRC Press. Nik Abdul Ghani, N. A. R., Laluddin, H., & Mat Nor, A. H. (2011). Maslahah as a Source of Islamic Transactions (Muamalat). Islamiyyat: International Journal of Islamic Studies, 33, 59-66. Nikolaev, A. G. (2001). The Extension and Transformation of the Two Level Game Theory and its Application to the Field of Communication. Doctoral Dissertation, The Florida State Universty, USA. Nisar, F., Farwa, M. U., & Nadeem, S. (2015). Spiritual Impacts of Islamic Beliefs and Worships to Address Psychological Problems. The Government-Annual Research Journal of Political Science., 4(4), 166-181. The Noble Qura'n (2000). Al-Madinah, KSA: King Fahd Complex for the Printing the Holy Quran O‟reilly, M., & Parker, N. (2013). Unsatisfactory Saturation: A Critical Exploration of the Notion of Saturated Sample Sizes in Qualitative Research. Qualitative Research, 13(2), 190-197. Oliva, T. A., & Leap, T. L. (1981). A Taxonomy of Bargaining Models. Human Relations, 34(11), 935-946. Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation Behavior. New York, USA: Academic Press, Inc. Punch, K. F. (2014). Introduction to Social Research Quantitative & Qualitative Approaches. Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage Publications, Inc. Rafida, A. N., Alina, A., Hafiz, H., & Saifol, B. (2012). Negotiating Interests According to Islamic Approach on Halal Certifications: Challenges in Creating Jobs. World Applied Sciences Journal, 17, 11-16. Raiffa, H. (1990). The Art and Science of Negotiation. USA: Harvard University Press. Ramdani, A., Mohammed, R. b., & Ahmad, M. K. (2016a). The Concept of Negotiation from the Islam Perspective (In the Islamic Organization). The Social Sciences, 11(20), 4790-4800. Ramdani, A., Mohammed, R. b., & Ahmad, M. K. (2016b). The Principles of Shariah-Compliant Negotiation (SCN) from the Islamic Organization Perspective. International Business Management, 10(18), 4172-4184. Rubin, J. Z., & Brown, B. R. (1975). The Social Psychology of Bargaining and Negotiation. New York, USA: Academic Press, Inc. Salacuse, J. W. (2004). Negotiating: The Top Ten Ways that Culture Can Affect your Negotiation. IVEY Business Journal, 69(1), 1-6. Saunders, H. H. (1985). We Need a Larger Theory of Negotiation: The Importance of Pre-negotiating Phases. Negotiation Journal, 1(3), 249-262. Saunders, M. N., Thornhill, A., & Lewis, P. (2016). Research Methods for Business Students. England, UK: Pearson Education Limited. Schnackenberg, A. K., & Tomlinson, E. C. (2014). Organizational Transparency a New Perspective on Managing Trust in Organization-Stakeholder Relationships. Journal of Management, 42(7), 1784-1810. Shenton, A. K. (2004). Strategies for Ensuring Trustworthiness in Qualitative Research Projects. Education for Information, 22(2), 63-75. Spector, B. I. (1977). Negotiation as a Psychological Process. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21(4), 607-618. Stuhlmacher, A. F., & Champagne, M. V. (2000). The Impact of Time Pressure and Information on Negotiation Process and Decisions. Group Decision and Negotiation, 9(6), 471-491. Tanya, A., & Azeta, C. (2008). Negotiation Theory and Practice; A Review of the Literature. FAO Policy Learning Programme. Thomas, J. (2005). Negotiate to Win: The 21 Rules of Successful Negotiation. USA: Harper Collins Publishers. Thomas, J., & Harden, A. (2008). Methods for the Thematic Synthesis of Qualitative Research in Systematic Reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 8(1), 1-19. Thompson, L. (1991). Information Exchange in Negotiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27(2), 161-179. Thompson, L., & Hastie, R. (1990). Social Perception in Negotiation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 47(1), 98-123. Thompson, L., Peterson, E., & Kray, L. (1995). Social Context in Negotiation: An Information-Processing Perspective. In R. Kramer & D. Messick (Eds.), Negotiation as a Social Process (pp. 5-36). Thousand Oaks, USA: Sage Publications, Inc. Treadwell, D. (2014). Interducing Communication Research; Paths of Inquiry (2 ed.). USA: SAGE Publication,Inc. Tu, Y.-T., & Chih, H.-C. (2011). An Analysis on Negotiation Styles by Religious Beliefs. International Business Research, 4(3), 243. Ukandu, N. E., & Ukpere, W. I. (2013). Effects of Poor Training and Development on the Work Performance of the Fast Food Employees in Cape Town. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 4(14), 571. Ullah, F., & Anwarii, S. (2014). The Importance of Confidentiality: From Islamic and Psychological Perspective. Acta Islamica, 2(2), 5-10. Usman, H. (2013). No Compulsion in Religion: Islam & the Freedom of Belief. London, UK: Quilliam Foundation. Vaismoradi, M., Jones, J., Turunen, H., & Snelgrove, S. (2016). Theme Development in Qualitative Content Analysis and Thematic Analysis. Journal of Nursing Education and Practice, 6(5), 100-110. Vorauer, J. D., & Claude, S.-D. (1998). Perceived Versus Actual Transparency of Goals in Negotiation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(4), 371-385. Wahed, H. (2015). Sulh: Its Application in Malaysia. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 20(6), 71-79. Walton, R. E. (1991). A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations:An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. USA: Cornell University Press. Walton, R. E., & McKersie, R. B. (1965). A Behavioral Theory of Labor Negotiations: An Analysis of a Social Interaction System. USA: Cornell University Press. Wehr, H. (1976). A Dictionary of Modern Written Arabic (3 ed.). New York, USA: Spoken Language Services, Inc. Weingart, L. R., Thompson, L. L., Bazerman, M. H., & Carroll, J. S. (1990). Tactical Behavior and Negotiation Outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 1(1), 7-31. Welsh, N. A. (2004). Fairness: Perceptions of Fairness in Negotiation. Marquette Law Review, 87(4), 14. Wimmer, R. D., & Dominick, J. R. (2003). Mass Media Research: An introduction. (7 ed.). USA: Wadsworth Publishing. Winham, G. R., & Bovis, H. E. (1979). Distribution of Benefits in Negotiation Report on a State Department Training Simulation. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 23(3), 408-424. Yassin, S. M., & Dahalan, D. (2012). Unity Concept from Islamic Perspective and the Reality of Unity in Malaysia. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences 02(04), 66-83. Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative Research from Start to Finish. New York, USA: The Guilford Press. Young, O. R. (1975). Bargaining: Formal Theories of Negotiation. USA: University of Illinois Press. Yousefvand, M. (2012). Diplomatic Negotiations from Islamic Point of View. Journal of Basic and Applied Scientific Research, 2(1), 309-317. Zahid, M. R. A., Hussain, N., Islam, K., Aziz, F., & Ghazenfer, S. K. (2012). Growth of Islamic Banking in Pakistan by Using AID Model. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 3(23), 152-164. Zakir Naik. (2009). Which School of Thought Should A Muslim Follow? Retrieved on 14/06/2016, from https://islamtheultimatejourney. wordpress.com/querieson-islam-by-dr-zakir-naik. Zartman, I. W. (1977). Negotiation as a Joint Decision-Making Process. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 21(4), 619-638. Zartman, I. W. (1984). Negotiation: Theory and Reality. Paper presented at the International Negotiation, Washington DC, USA. Zartman, I. W. (1988). Common Elements in the Analysis of the Negotiation Process. Negotiation Journal, 4(1), 31-43. Zartman, I. W. (2008). Negotiation and Conflict Management: Essays on Theory and Practice. New York, USA: Routledge. Zartman, I. W. (2010). Negotiation Pedagogy: International Relations. International Negotiation, 15(2), 229-246. Zhu, K. (2004). Information Transparency of Business-to-Business Electronic Markets: A Game-Theoretic Analysis. Management Science, 50(5), 670-685. Zubair, H. M., & Azhar, H. H. (2014). Islamic Sharia Teachings and Practices for Preventing Bullying. American International Journal of Contemporary Research 4(1), 254-265.