The effectiveness of SCAMPER and CoRT programs on creativity among gifted and talented students

The gifted and talented students possess special abilities. There is a need to enhance their special abilities, ideas and creativity. Hence, there is the need to determine and utilize creative thinking programs that develop thinking skills, their usefulness and relevance as well as their validity. H...

Full description

Saved in:

Bibliographic Details
Main Author:	Khawaldeh, Hamzah Mahmod Ali
Format:	Thesis
Language:	eng eng eng
Published:	2018
Subjects:	LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice)
Online Access:	https://etd.uum.edu.my/7420/1/Depositpermission_s95521.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/7420/2/s95521_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/7420/3/s95521_02.pdf
Tags:	Add Tag No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!

id	my-uum-etd.7420
record_format	uketd_dc
institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection	UUM ETD
language	eng eng eng
advisor	Md. Ali, Ruzlan
topic	LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice)
spellingShingle	LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice) Khawaldeh, Hamzah Mahmod Ali The effectiveness of SCAMPER and CoRT programs on creativity among gifted and talented students
description	The gifted and talented students possess special abilities. There is a need to enhance their special abilities, ideas and creativity. Hence, there is the need to determine and utilize creative thinking programs that develop thinking skills, their usefulness and relevance as well as their validity. However, there are limited numbers of studies, in particular on the use of SCAMPER and CoRT programs, among gifted and talented students at the King Abdullah Schools for Excellence (KASE) in Jordan. The present study examines the effectiveness of the SCAMPER and CoRT programs on creativity among the students at KASE in Jordan. The study had used quantitative and qualitative approaches. Quasi-experimental research design and tests were used to obtain the quantitative data while qualitative data was collected via semistructured interviews. The experimental group consisted of 42 students, with 21 were in the SCAMPER program group and 21 were in the CoRT program group. The control group was comprised of 21 students control group. The Torrance Test of Creative Thinking (TTCT) was used to measure students’ creativity for pretest and posttest. The research findings show a significant effectiveness of both the SCAMPER and CoRT programs on students’ creativity. However, the research findings show that there is no significant difference between the SCAMPER and CoRT programs on the students’ creativity. Analyses of the qualitative data indicate that the learning environment in KASE is different from other regular schools. This difference seemingly had contributed to positive learning process that improved students thinking ability. The research findings also provide evidence for the effectiveness of the SCAMPER and CoRT programs on the students’ creativity and flexibility in thinking. The findings in this study contribute to the knowledge about teaching within KASE in Jordan and can be used as a guide for the enhancement of learning among excellent students. This study also contributes to studies on gifted and talented students in Jordan.
format	Thesis
qualification_name	Ph.D.
qualification_level	Doctorate
author	Khawaldeh, Hamzah Mahmod Ali
author_facet	Khawaldeh, Hamzah Mahmod Ali
author_sort	Khawaldeh, Hamzah Mahmod Ali
title	The effectiveness of SCAMPER and CoRT programs on creativity among gifted and talented students
title_short	The effectiveness of SCAMPER and CoRT programs on creativity among gifted and talented students
title_full	The effectiveness of SCAMPER and CoRT programs on creativity among gifted and talented students
title_fullStr	The effectiveness of SCAMPER and CoRT programs on creativity among gifted and talented students
title_full_unstemmed	The effectiveness of SCAMPER and CoRT programs on creativity among gifted and talented students
title_sort	effectiveness of scamper and cort programs on creativity among gifted and talented students
granting_institution	Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department	Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences
publishDate	2018
url	https://etd.uum.edu.my/7420/1/Depositpermission_s95521.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/7420/2/s95521_01.pdf https://etd.uum.edu.my/7420/3/s95521_02.pdf
_version_	1747828215175446528
spelling	my-uum-etd.74202021-08-09T08:26:21Z The effectiveness of SCAMPER and CoRT programs on creativity among gifted and talented students 2018 Khawaldeh, Hamzah Mahmod Ali Md. Ali, Ruzlan Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts & Sciences Awang Had Salleh Graduate School of Arts and Sciences LB1025-1050.75 Teaching (Principles and practice) The gifted and talented students possess special abilities. There is a need to enhance their special abilities, ideas and creativity. Hence, there is the need to determine and utilize creative thinking programs that develop thinking skills, their usefulness and relevance as well as their validity. However, there are limited numbers of studies, in particular on the use of SCAMPER and CoRT programs, among gifted and talented students at the King Abdullah Schools for Excellence (KASE) in Jordan. The present study examines the effectiveness of the SCAMPER and CoRT programs on creativity among the students at KASE in Jordan. The study had used quantitative and qualitative approaches. Quasi-experimental research design and tests were used to obtain the quantitative data while qualitative data was collected via semistructured interviews. The experimental group consisted of 42 students, with 21 were in the SCAMPER program group and 21 were in the CoRT program group. The control group was comprised of 21 students control group. The Torrance Test of Creative Thinking (TTCT) was used to measure students’ creativity for pretest and posttest. The research findings show a significant effectiveness of both the SCAMPER and CoRT programs on students’ creativity. However, the research findings show that there is no significant difference between the SCAMPER and CoRT programs on the students’ creativity. Analyses of the qualitative data indicate that the learning environment in KASE is different from other regular schools. This difference seemingly had contributed to positive learning process that improved students thinking ability. The research findings also provide evidence for the effectiveness of the SCAMPER and CoRT programs on the students’ creativity and flexibility in thinking. The findings in this study contribute to the knowledge about teaching within KASE in Jordan and can be used as a guide for the enhancement of learning among excellent students. This study also contributes to studies on gifted and talented students in Jordan. 2018 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/7420/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/7420/1/Depositpermission_s95521.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/7420/2/s95521_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/7420/3/s95521_02.pdf text eng public http://sierra.uum.edu.my/record=b1697778~S1 Ph.D. doctoral Universiti Utara Malaysia Ablahad, F., & Fataah, N. (2003). The effect of SCAMBER program on developing creative thinking. Research Journal of Teachers College, 13(1), 35–61. Abu Jado, M. (2003). The effect of a training program based on the “theory of inventive problem solving” – TRIZ – on developing creative thinking of a sample of 10th basic grade students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arabic Amman Graduate Studies University, Jordan. Abu Jado, S., & Nwfal, M. (2007). Teaching thinking: Theory and practice. Amman, Jordan: Al-masera Publishers. Adams, J. L. (1986). Conceptual blockbusting, a guide to better ideas. Reading, NY: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company. Adams, J. W. (2013). A case study: using lesson study to understand factors that affect teaching creative and critical thinking in the elementary classroom. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Drexel University, United States. Ahmad, A. (2011). Social networking sites ‘usage and students’ attitude towards social behaviors and academic adjustment in northern Nigerian universities. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Universiti Utara Malaysia. Kedah, Malaysia. Ahn, H. (2008). A study of leadership development programme for gifted primary school students in South Korea. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Durham University, London, England. Al Badarin, S. (2006). Effectiveness of a Strategy-Based Program for Idea-Generating (SCAMPER) on the Creative Ability and Self-Concept of a Jordanian Sample of Students with Learning Disabilities. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. Al Jabery, M., & Zumberg, M. (2008). General and special education systems in Jordan: Present and future perspectives. International Journal of Special Education, 23(1), 115-122. Al-Khatib, R. (1995). Impact a training program to perception skills, interaction, information and the sense on the development of creative thinking. (Unpublished Masters Dissertation). University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. AL- Makhatra, Z. (2007). The effect of CoRT program in improving decision making of the upper basic stage students in Ajman U.A.E. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arabic Amman Graduate Studies University, Jordan. Al Zyoudi, M. (2007). Topics in special education. Amman, Jordan: Dar Al Sharpq. Al Zyoudi, M. (2009). Effects of a creativity training program for breadth and organization on the creative thinking skills of students with learning disability. Journal of Faculty of Education UAEU, (26), 67-87 Al-abadi. Z. (2008). The effect of an educational program based on problem solving model on developing creative thinking skills among gifted disabled students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Arabic Amman Graduate Studies University. Amman, Jordan. Al-Asaf, H. (2000). The access to the research in the behavioral sciences (2nd ed). Riyadh, Saudi Arbia: Alabikan library. Alawad, A. (2011). What art classroom and social factors influence perceptions of creative thinking and practices of adolescent girls in Saudi Arabia?. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Northumbria University, Newcastle, England. Albuainain, A. Jassim, F. & Alnbhan, M (2015). The Impact of an Enrichment Program in Developing Creative Leadership Skills for the Bahraini 6th Gifted Female Graders. Second International Conference for the gifted and talented "Towards a national strategy for the care of innovators." Faculty of Education. University of the United Arab Emirates Al-daoud, E. (2004). Science as, memorization or participation. Amman, Jordan: Almasera Publishers. Al-Edwan, Z. (2011). Effectiveness of a training program based on cognitive research trust strategies to develop seventh grade students' critical thinking in history course. Journal of Social Sciences, 7(3), 436-442. Al-Faoury, O. (2014). The effect of teaching Cort program no (4) entitled/Creativity/on the gifted learners writings in Ein el-Basha Centre for Gifted Students. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(11), 2249-2257. Alhaddabi, D., Ghalioun, E., & Aqlan, A. (2013). The impact of implementing enrichment activities on 9th grade gifted students’ science achievement and creative thinking. The Arab Journal for Talent Development, 6, 1–28. Al-Hashash, D. (2013). The Constructing of an Instructional Program Based on the Idea-Generating Strategy and Measuring its Effect on Developing Creative Thinking Skills, Achievement Motivation and Cognitive Achievement among Students with Learning Disabilities. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Amman Arab University. Amman Jordan. Al-Husseiny, A. (2006). Developing creative thinking skills by administering "SCAMPER" program. (Research discussion paper RDP 2014–09). Retrieved from reserve website: http://www.gulfkids.com/pdf/Muhebah_D%20(7).pdf Al-Jallad, Z. (2006). The effectiveness of using CoRT thinking program on developing creative thinking for Arabic language and Islamic studies students in Ajman University of Science and Technology Network. Al-Qura University Journal, 18(2), 147–180. Aljughaiman, M., & Ayoub, A. (2012). The effect of an enrichment program on developing analytical, creative, and practical abilities of elementary gifted students. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 35(2), 153–174. Aljughaiman, M., & Ayoub, A. (2013). Evaluating the effects of the oasis enrichment model on gifted education : a meta-analysis study. Talent Development & Excellence,5(1), 99–113. Alkahtani, K. (2009). Creativity training effects upon concept map complexity of children with ADHD: An experimental study. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland. Al-Khatib, R. (2012). Impact a training program to perception skills, interaction, information and the sense on the development of creative thinking. (Unpublished Masters Dissertation). University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan Alkhozy, F. Al shayaa. S, & Aladwani, A. (2010). The effectiveness of De Bono thinking course (CoRT) in the development of creative thinking skills among college of education students at Kuwait University: An experimental study. Educational Journal Ain Shams University, 34(4), 1–32. Al-Ogayil, M. (2011). The effect of using proposed scientific enriching activities on promoting integrated science processes and creative thinking for elementary schools gifted students. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). King Saud University, Riyadh Saudi Arabia. Al-Qararah, A. (2014). The effect of using brain storming in teaching science in developing creative thinking skills for basic seventh grade students of tafila schools – south of Jordan. An-Najah University Journal for Research - Humanitie, 28(4), 668-706. Al-Rabadi, W. (2011). Enrichment activities and its relationship with the level of acquiring the skills of critical thinking among the students of the Pioneer centres at the southern governorates. An-Najah University Journal for Research, 25(6), 1489-1508. Alrowethy, M. (2012). The effectiveness of SCAMPER strategy on the teaching of sciences to develop of creative thinking skills among gifted in the primary school at AL- Madinah AL- Munowarah. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Taibah university, Taibah, Saudi Arabia. Alsenaidi, F. (2012). Electronic brainstorming in Saudi primary education. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Exeter, Exeter, England. Al-Shabatat, M. (2011). Gifted and talented education in Jordan: A spotlight on programs and activities. Talent Talks, 2(2), 7-10. Alzoubi, A. M., Al Qudah, M. F., Albursan, I. S., Bakhiet, S. F., & Abduljabbar, A. S. (2016). The Effect of Creative Thinking Education in Enhancing Creative Self-Efficacy and Cognitive Motivation. Journal of Educational and Developmental Psychology, 6(1), 117. Al-Zoubi, S. (2011). The problems faced by talented students in Pioneer Centres in Jordan. Ain Shams University, 545(2), 1–25. Amabile, T. M. (1983) Social psychology of creativity: A componential conceptualization, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(2), 997–1013. Amabile, T. M. (1988). A model of creativity and innovation in organizations. Research in organizational behavior, 10, 123–167. Amabile, T. M. (1989). Growing up creative: Nurturing a lifetime of creativity. Buffalo, NY: The Creative Education Foundation. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity and innovation in organizations. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School. Amabile, T. M. (1999) Consensual assessment, in Runco, M. A., Pritzker, S. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 346-349), San Diego, CA: Academic Press Amabile, T.M. (2012) The componential theory of creativity, Harvard Business School working paper to appear in Kessler, E.H. (Ed.) Encyclopedia of Management Theory, in press (Sage Publications, 2013) Arancibia, V., Lissi, M. R., & Narea, M. (2008). Impact in the school system of a strategy for identifying and selecting academically talented students: The of program PENTA-UC. High Ability studis, 19(1), 53-65. Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative research, 1(3), 385-405. Awamleh, H., Al Assaf, F., Borini, I & Abdul Rahman, A. (2013). The intelligence's level of gifted and ordinary students in seventh and eighth grades, in accordance with the raven's advanced matrices test in Irbid governorate in relation to some variables (Sex, Mothers' Qualification). American International Journal of Contemporary Research, 3(5), 26-36. Awamleh, H., Al Farah, Y., & El-Zraigat, I. (2012). The level of creative abilities dimensions according to Torrance formal test (B) and their relationship with some variables (Sex, Age, GPA). International Education Studies, 5(6), 138–148. Baer, J. (1994). Why you shouldn't trust creativity tests. Educational Leadership, 51(4), 80-83. Baer, J., & Kaufman, C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The amusement park theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27(3), 158–163. Bailey, L. (2007). Social and emotional needs of gifted students: What school counselors need to know to most effectively serve this diverse student population. Paper presented at the 2007 Association for Counselor Education and Supervision Conference (pp. 11-14). Columbus, Ohio. Barha, S. (2000). The effects of a CoRT program on developing creative thinking. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. Basadur, M., Pringle, P., Speranzini, G. and Bacot, M. (2000) Collaborative problem solving through creativity in problem definition: Expanding the pie, Creativity and Innovation Management, 9(1), 54–76. Basadur, M.S., Graen, G.B., Green, S.G. (1982), Training in creative problem solving: Effects on ideation and problem finding in an applied research organization, Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 30(1) 4l – 70. Baum, S., and Owen, S. (1988). High ability/learning disabled students: How are they different? Gifted Child Quarterly, 32, 3, 321-326. Bell, J. (1999). Doining your research project a guide for first-time research in education and social science. Buckingham, Ph: Open University Press. Bender, S. (2006). Struggles of gifted children in school: Possible negative outcomes. Gifted Education Press Quarterly, 20, 10–13. Bergquist, C. (1999). A comparative view of creative theories: psychoanalytic, behaviourist and humanist. (Vantage Quest's) Retrieved from http://www.vantagequest.org/trees/comparative. htm#.VFaHJtKSw9H Best, J., & Kahn, V. (2006). Research in education (10th Eds.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Beyer, K. (1991). Teaching thinking skills: A hand book for secondary school teachers. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Bilda, R., & Gero, J. S. (2005). Does sketching off-load visuo-spatial working memory. Studying designers, 5(5), 145-160. Birbeck D, 2010, Benchmarking and peer review of teaching practice for the purpose of evidencing excellence in teaching and learning, The Journal of the Education Research Group of Adelaide. 1(3). Blewee, N. (2011). The impact of the De Bono (CoRT) in creative thinking on the development of the flow of ideas in the fifth grade primary students in government schools in Tabuk area Saudi Arabia. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. Bloom, B., & Crabtree, B. F. (2006). The qualitative research interview. Medical education, 40(4), 314-321. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology.Qualitative research in psychology, 3(2), 77-101. Briggs, A. & Coleman, M. (2007). Research method in educational leadership and management. London, England: Paul Chapman Publishing. Brinkman, J. (2010). Teaching creatively and teaching for creativity. Arts Education Policy Review, 111(2), 48–50. Brody, E., & Mills, J. (1997). Gifted children with learning disabilities: A review of the issues. Journal of learning disabilities, 30(3), 282-296. Bryman, A. (2001). Social research methods. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. Buser, K., Buser, J., Gladding, T., & Wilkerson, J. (2011). The creative counselor: using the SCAMPER model in counselor training. Journal of Creativity in Mental Health, 6(4), 256–273. Buzan, T., & Buzan, B. (1993). The mind map book how to use radiant thinking to maximise your brain's untapped potential. NY: Plume. Can, A., & Semerci, N. (2007). The effect of "The Six Thinking Hats Technique" on the students' academic achievement in social studies at primary school. Egitim Ve Bilim-Education and Science, 32(145), 39-52. Çelikler, D., & Harman, G. (2015). The Effect of the SCAMPER Technique in Raising Awareness Regarding the Collection and Utilization of Solid Waste. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(10), 149-159.. Chaffee, J. (2014). Thinking Critically. Cengage Learning. Retrieved from http://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id= o72iAgAAQBAJ&pgis=1 Chan, S., & Yuen, M. (2013). Teachers’ beliefs and practices for nurturing creativity in students: Perspectives from teachers of gifted students in Hong Kong. Gifted Education International, (5), 1-14. Chance, P. (1986). Thinking in the classroom: A survey of programs. NY: Teachers College Press. Charmaz, K. (2003). Qualitative interviewing and grounded theory analysis in J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Inside Interviewing: New Lenses, New Concerns. London: Sage. Christian, T. (2008). A statewide evaluation of gifted education in Missouri. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). University of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri, Columbia. Chulvi, V., González-Cruz, M. C., Mulet, E., & Aguilar-Zambrano, J. (2013). Influence of the type of idea-generation method on the creativity of solutions. Research in Engineering Design, 24(1), 33-41. Chulvi, V., Mulet, E., Chakrabarti, A., López-Mesa, B., & González-Cruz, C. (2012). Comparison of the degree of creativity in the design outcomes using different design methods. Journal of Engineering Design, 23(4), 241-269. Clapham, M. M. (1998). Structure of Figural Forms A and B of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Educational & Psychological Measurement, 58, 275–283. Clapham, M. M. (2004). The convergent validity of the Torrance tests of creative thinking and creativity interest inventories. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 64(5), 828-841. Clark, B. (1997). Growing Up Gifted, Charles E. Merril,(Ed.) Los Angeles: Prentice Hall. Clarke, J. H. (1990). Patterns of thinking: Integrating learning skills in content teaching. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education. NY: Routledge. Cohen, M., & Kim, M. (1999). Piaget's equilibration theory and the young gifted child: A balancing act. Roeper Review, 21(3), 201-206. Cohen, M., (2004). Writing a work sample: A step by step guide for per-service and in-service teachers K-12. Mason, OH: Thomson Custom Publishing. Costa, A. L. (2001). Teacher behaviors that enable student thinking. In A. L. Costa (Ed.), Developing minds: A resource book for teaching thinking (3rd. ed., pp. 359-369). Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development. Cotton K, 1997, Teaching Thinking Skill School Improvement Research Serious, SIRS, USA. Cotton, K. (1991). Teaching thinking skills. Retrieved from Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory's School Improvement Research Series Web site: http://www.nwrel.org/scpd/sirs/6/ cu11.html Craft, A. (2000). Creativity across the primary curriculum: Framing and developing practice. London: Routledge. Craft, A. (2001). An analysis of research and literature on creativity in education. Qualifications and Curriculum Authority, 1-37. Retrieved from: http://www.ncaction.org.uk/ creativity/creativity_report.pdf Craft, A. (2001). Little c Creativity. In A. Craft, B. Jeffrey & M. Leibling (Eds.), Creativity in education. London: Continuum. Craft, A. (2003). Creative Thinking in the Early Years of Education. Early Years, 23(2), 143–154. Cramond, B. (2001). Interview with E. Paul Torrance on creativity in the last and next millennia. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 12(3), 116-20. Cramond, B., Benson, L., & Martin, C. (2002). Serving gifted students through inclusion/A teacher’s perspective/A parent’s perspective. Roeper Review, 24(3), 125–127. Cramond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Bandalos, D., & Zuo, L. (2005). A report on the 40-year follow-up of the Torrance Tests of creative thinking: Alive and well in the new millennium. Gifted Child Quarterly, 49(4), 283-291. Creswell, J. & Plano L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Creswell, J. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods approaches. US: SAGE. Creswell, J. (2012). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. NY: Sage. Cropley, A. (2001). Creativity in education & learning: A guide for teachers and educators. NY: Psychology Press. Cropley, A. (2009). Creativity in education and learning: A guide for teachers and educators. NY: Routledge. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. NY: Harper & Row Publishers, Inc. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. NY: Harper Collins Publishers. Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Epstein, R. (1999). A creative dialogue. Psychology Today, 58-61. Dababnah, K. (1998). Developing an assessment tool for the identification of problems and needs of gifted student’s at the 10th grades of basic education in Jordan. Unpublished thesis. University of Jordan: Amman. Dai, Y., & Coleman, J. (2005). Introduction to the special issue on nature, nurture, and the development of exceptional competence. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(3-4), 254-269. Dalah, F. (2002). The effects of a cognitive strategies on improving the performance of students with learning disabilities. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan. Dalzell, J. (1998). Giftedness: Infancy to adolescence-a developmental perspective Roeper Review, 20(4), 259-264. Daniels, S. (1997). Creativity in the classroom: Characteristics, climate, and curriculum. Handbook of gifted education, 2, 292-307. Davis, A. & Rimm, S. (2004). Education of the gifted and talented (5th.ed). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Davis, A. (1997). Identifying creative students and measuring creativity. Handbook of gifted education, 2, 253-281. Davis, A. (1998). Creativity is forever (4th ed.). Dubuque, IA: Kendall/Hunt Publishing Company. Davis, A., & Rimm, S. B. (1998). Education of the gifted and talented (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Davis, G., Rimm, S., & Siegle, D. (2010). Education of the gifted and talented (6th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. De Bono, E. (1986). The practical teaching of thinking using the CoRT method. Special Service in Schools, 3(1−2), 33−47. De Bono, E. (1991). `The CORT thinking skills programme’ . In MACLURE, S. and DAVIES, P. (Eds) Learning to Think: Thinking to Learn. London, England: Pergamon. De Bono, E. (1998). CoRT program to teach thinking. In N. alsroor (Ed.). Amman, Jordan: Dar al fikr. De Bono, E. (1999). Six thinking hats. (2nd ed.). NY: Back Bay Books. De Bono, E. (2000). The De Bono code book: Going beyond the limits of language. London, Engalnd: Viking. De Bono, E. (2004). Edward De Bono website. Retrieved from: http://www.edwDeBono.com/De Bono/index.html De Bono, E. (2007). How to have creative ideas: 62 exercises to develop the mind. London, England: Vermilion. Delisle, R., & Galbraith, J. (2002). When gifted kids don't have all the answers: How to meet their social and emotional needs. Minneapolis: Free Spirit Publishing. Demirci, C. (2007). The effect of creativity on achievement and attitudes in teaching science. Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences, 32, 65-75. Denscombe, M. (1998). The good research guide: For small-scale social research projects. Buckingham: Open University Press. Dingli, S. (2001). Research carried out on the work of Dr. Edward De Bono. Retrieved from: http://www.edwDe Bono.com/cort/litreview.htm. Drever, E. (2003). Using semi-structured interviews in small-scale research. University of Glasgow, the SCRE centre. Eberle, B. (1996). Scamper on: Games for imagination development. Texas: Prufork prees INC. Eberle, B. (1997). Scamper on: More creative games and activities for imagination development. Texas: Prufork prees INC. Eberle, B. (2008). Scamper: Creative games and activities for imagination development. Texas: Prufork prees INC. Edgecombe, N. D. (2011). Accelerating the academic achievement of students referred to developmental education. Columbia: Community College Research Center. Edwards, J. (1991). Research work on the CoRT method. In: S Maclure and P. Davies (Eds.), Learning to think: Thinking to learn. Oxford: Pergamon Press. El-Zraigat, A. (2012). Counseling gifted and talented students in Jordanian inclusive schools: Conclusion and implication. International Journal of Special Education, 27(2), 57-63. Epstein, S. (2008). An early start on thinking. Educational Leadership65(5), 38–42. Eragamreddy, N. (2013). Teaching Creative Thinking Skills. International Journal of English Language & Translation Studies, 1(2), 124–145. Erwin, O., & Worrell, C. (2012). Assessment practices and the underrepresentation of minority students in gifted and talented education. Journal of Psycho educational Assessment, 30(1), 74-87. Esquivel, G. B. (1995). Teacher behaviours that foster creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7(2), 185-201. Feldhusen, F. (1993). A conception of creative thinking and creativity training. Nurturing and developing creativity: The Emergence Of A Discipline, 31-50. Feldhusen, F., & Goh, E. (1995). Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creativity Research Journal, 8(3),231-247. Feldman, D. H., & Benjamin, A. C. (2006). Creativity and education: an American retrospective. Cambridge Journal of Education, 36(3), 319–336. Firestien, R.L. (1990) Effects of creative problem solving on communication behaviors in small groups, Small Group Research, 21(4), 507–521. Fisher, R. (2005). Teaching children to think. London, England: Nelson Thornes. Fleith, D. (2000). Teacher and student perceptions of creativity in the classroom environment. Roeper Review, 22(3), 148-153. Fleith, D., Renzulli, J., and Westberg, K. (2002). Effects of a creative training program on divergent thinking abilities and self-concept in monolingual and bilingual classrooms. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 3, 373-386. Flick, U. (2008). Designing qualitative research. US: Sage. Frasier, M. (1997). Gifted minority students: Reframing approaches to their identification and education. In N. Colangelo & G.A. Davis (2nd ed.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 498-515). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Frasier, M., & Passow, A. H. (1994). Towards a new paradigm for identifying talent potential. US: Research Monograph Freedman, K. (2010). Rethinking Creativity: A Definition to Support Contemporary Practice. Art Education, 63(2), 8-15. Freeman, J. (2001) Out-of-school educational provision for the gifted and talented around the world. A report for the DfES. http://www.joanfreeman.com/mainpages/ freepapers.htm Freeman, J. (2001). Gifted children grown up. London, England: David Fulton. Fryer, M. (1996). Creative teaching and learning. London: Paul Chapman Publishing Ltd. Gagné, F. (1991) Toward a differential model of giftedness and talent. In N. Colangelo and G.A. Davis (Eds.) Handbook of gifted education. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon. Gagne, F. (1993). Constructs and models pertaining to exceptional human abilities. In K. A. Heller, F. J. Mönks, & A. H. Passow (Eds.), International handbook of research and devel-opment of giftedness and talent (pp. 69-87). Oxford: Pergamon. Gagne, F. (2004). An imperative, but, alas, improbable consensus!. Roeper Review, 27(1), 12-14. Gall, D. Gall, Joyce P. & Borg, R. (2009). Educational research. an introduction. (7th ed). NY: Pearson. Gall, D. Gall, P. & Borg, R. (2003). Educational research. an introduction. (7th ed). NY: Pearson. Gall, D., Borg, W. R., & Gall, P. (1996). Educational research: An introduction. NY: White Plains. Gallagher, J., & Gallagher, A. (1994). Teaching the gifted child (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon. Gardner, H. (2000). The disciplined mind: Beyond facts and standardized tests, the K-12 education that every child deserves. NY: Penguin Books. Gavin, K., Casa, T., Adelson, L., Carroll, S. R., & Sheffield, J. (2009). The impact of advanced curriculum on the achievement of mathematically promising elementary students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 35(3), 188-202 Gay, R. (1976). Educational research competencies for analysis and application. Columbus: Charles E. Merrill publishing company. Gay, R., & Airasian, P. (2003). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications (7th ed). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. Gay, R., Mills, E., & Airasian, P. W. (2009). Educational research: Competencies for analysis and applications. Columbus, OH: Pearson. George, M., & Zhou, J. (2007). Dual tuning in a supportive context: Joint contributions of positive mood, negative mood, and supervisory behaviors to employee creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 50(3), 605-622. Gladding, T. (2011). Using Creativity and the Creative Arts in Counseling: An International Approach. Turkish Psychological Counseling & Guidance Journal, 4(35) 1-7. Glenn, E. (1997). Scamper for student creativity. Education Digest, 62, 67-68. Golafshani, N. (2003). Understanding reliability and validity in qualitative research. The qualitative report, 8(4), 597-607. Gottfredson, L. S. (2003). Dissecting practical intelligence theory: Its claims and evidence. Intelligence, 31(4), 343-397. Gray, P. (2011). Is real educational reform possible? if so, how?. Retrieved from July 2014. http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/freedom-learn/201108/isrealeducational-reform. Green, L., Camilli, G., & Elmore, B. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of complementary methods in education research. London, England: Routledge. 186 Gross, M. (2004). Exceptionally gifted children. (2nd Edition). London, England: Routledge Falmer. Guilford, J. P. (1950) Creativity, American Psychologist, 5(9): 444–454. Hair, F. Black, C., Babin, J. & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Australia: Pearson. Hall, L. (2009). Problem solving and creativity: A gender and grade level comparison. (Unpublished Doctoral dissertation). Tennessee State University, US. Hallahan, D., Kauffman, J. & Pullen, P. (2012). Exceptional learners: An introduction to special education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Halpern, F. (2002). Thought and knowledge: An introduction to critical thinking. London, England: Routledge. Hancer, A. H. (2013). The correlation between the scientific process and creative thinking skills of the preservice teachers. International Journal of Academic Research,5(3), 240–246. Harlen, W. (2000). The teaching of science in primary schools, 3rd. London; David Fulton. Harrison, C. (1999). Visual representation of the young gifted child. Roeper Review, 21(3), 189-194. Healy, J. M. (1990). Endangered minds: Why children don’t think and what we can do about it.NY: Simon & Schuster Paperbacks. Heausler, N. L., & Thompson, B. (1988). Structure of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 48, 463–468. Hee, K. (2005). The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education. The Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16(2-3), 57–66. Heiman, W. (1999). Research methods in psychology. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. Hertzog, B. (1997). Open-ended activities and their role in maintaining challenge. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 21(1), 54-81. Hipple, J. (2005). The integration of TRIZ with other ideation tools and processes as well as with psychological assessment tools. Creativity and Innovation Management, 14(1), 22-33. Hlasny, G. (2008). Creativity: A comparison of gifted students. US: ProQuest.

The effectiveness of SCAMPER and CoRT programs on creativity among gifted and talented students

Similar Items