Keberkesanan Program Azam Tani Di daerah Kubang Pasu

The Azam Tani program is one of the Government Transformation Program (GTP) that is actively implemented in Kedah. Recently, there are various issues regarding the implementation and management of this program being debated at the highest level of the Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-based Industry....

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Nur A’dilah Hani, Zulkifly
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2018
Subjects:
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/7825/1/s820347_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/7825/2/s820347_02.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.7825
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
advisor Samsudin, Shamzaeffa
topic S Agriculture (General)
spellingShingle S Agriculture (General)
Nur A’dilah Hani, Zulkifly
Keberkesanan Program Azam Tani Di daerah Kubang Pasu
description The Azam Tani program is one of the Government Transformation Program (GTP) that is actively implemented in Kedah. Recently, there are various issues regarding the implementation and management of this program being debated at the highest level of the Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-based Industry. Hence, to open individually understanding who concern of support assistance program in the agricultural sector, the researcher intends to study the effectiveness of the Azam Tani Program especially in the Kubang Pasu District. The specific objectives are to evaluate the level of skills dominated by the participants, to study the factors influencing the development of the projects implementation by participants and to identify the changes of behaviour among participants before and after joining the Azam Tani Program. This study was carried out using questionnaires distributed to 50 respondents of Azam Tani Program. Data collection and analysis were analysed using Statistical Packages for Social Science (SPSS) version 22.0. The analysis techniques used in this study are descriptive analysis, Pearson Correlation analysis and paired t test analysis. The analysis technique were based on each specific objectives. The findings show that there are still some participants who have not yet developed skills since joining this program. In fact, the effectiveness of the implementation of this program requires more emphasis on the factors of monitoring by extension officer, age, educational level, marital status and part-time worker. These factors are significant in analysis coleration at 5% and 10% confidence levels. In addition, there were changes of participant’s behaviour in savings, working hours and initiatives to diversify project inputs and outputs by participants of this program. Overall, the effectiveness of Azam Tani Program in the Kubang Pasu District was achieved but there were certain participant need more monitoring and guidance by agricultural department which is to improve their current implementation productivity.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Nur A’dilah Hani, Zulkifly
author_facet Nur A’dilah Hani, Zulkifly
author_sort Nur A’dilah Hani, Zulkifly
title Keberkesanan Program Azam Tani Di daerah Kubang Pasu
title_short Keberkesanan Program Azam Tani Di daerah Kubang Pasu
title_full Keberkesanan Program Azam Tani Di daerah Kubang Pasu
title_fullStr Keberkesanan Program Azam Tani Di daerah Kubang Pasu
title_full_unstemmed Keberkesanan Program Azam Tani Di daerah Kubang Pasu
title_sort keberkesanan program azam tani di daerah kubang pasu
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department School of Economics, Finance & Banking
publishDate 2018
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/7825/1/s820347_01.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/7825/2/s820347_02.pdf
_version_ 1747828271589883904
spelling my-uum-etd.78252021-08-11T05:17:37Z Keberkesanan Program Azam Tani Di daerah Kubang Pasu 2018 Nur A’dilah Hani, Zulkifly Samsudin, Shamzaeffa School of Economics, Finance & Banking School of Economics, Finance & Banking S Agriculture (General) The Azam Tani program is one of the Government Transformation Program (GTP) that is actively implemented in Kedah. Recently, there are various issues regarding the implementation and management of this program being debated at the highest level of the Ministry of Agriculture and Agro-based Industry. Hence, to open individually understanding who concern of support assistance program in the agricultural sector, the researcher intends to study the effectiveness of the Azam Tani Program especially in the Kubang Pasu District. The specific objectives are to evaluate the level of skills dominated by the participants, to study the factors influencing the development of the projects implementation by participants and to identify the changes of behaviour among participants before and after joining the Azam Tani Program. This study was carried out using questionnaires distributed to 50 respondents of Azam Tani Program. Data collection and analysis were analysed using Statistical Packages for Social Science (SPSS) version 22.0. The analysis techniques used in this study are descriptive analysis, Pearson Correlation analysis and paired t test analysis. The analysis technique were based on each specific objectives. The findings show that there are still some participants who have not yet developed skills since joining this program. In fact, the effectiveness of the implementation of this program requires more emphasis on the factors of monitoring by extension officer, age, educational level, marital status and part-time worker. These factors are significant in analysis coleration at 5% and 10% confidence levels. In addition, there were changes of participant’s behaviour in savings, working hours and initiatives to diversify project inputs and outputs by participants of this program. Overall, the effectiveness of Azam Tani Program in the Kubang Pasu District was achieved but there were certain participant need more monitoring and guidance by agricultural department which is to improve their current implementation productivity. 2018 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/7825/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/7825/1/s820347_01.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/7825/2/s820347_02.pdf text eng public https://sierra.uum.edu.my/record=b1699318~S1 masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Adijah, A. (2016). Kajian hubungan budaya organisasi dan inovasi dengan prestasi koperasi dan faktor penyederhana integrasi strategi di kalangan koperasi di Perak (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Utara Malaysia). Asngari, P. S., Tjitropranoto, P., & Saefuddin, A. (2008). Determinant Factors To Increase Agri-Extensionworker Performance To Empower Farmer (A Case Study In District Of Kampar, Riau Province). Bryman, A., Becker, S., & Sempik, J. (2008). Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research: A view from social policy. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 11(4), 261-276. Cancino, C. A., Bonilla, C. A., & Vergara, M. (2015). The impact of government support programs for the development of businesses in Chile. Management Decision, 53(8), 1736-1754. Cramer, G. L., Jensen, C. W., & Southgate Jr, D. D. (2001). Agricultural economics and agribusiness (No. Ed. 8). John Wiley and Sons. Davis, J. H., & Goldberg, R. A. (1957). A concept of agribusiness. Division of research. Graduate School of Business Administration. Harvard University, Boston, EUA. Davis, J. H., & Goldberg, R. A. (1957). Concept of agribusiness. Egeru, A., Okello, P., Majaliwa, M. G. J., Mukwaya, P., & Isubikalu, P. (2010). The effect of land use/cover change on biomass stock in dryland areas of Eastern Uganda. A case study of olio sub-county in soroti district. Journal of Applied Sciences and Environmental Management, 14(4). Fusonie, A. E. (1995). John H. Davis: Architect of the agribusiness concept revisited. Agricultural History, 69(2), 326-348. Green, S. B., Salkind, N. J., & Jones, T. M. (1996). Using SPSS for Windows; analyzing and understanding data. Prentice Hall PTR. Haggblade, S. (2011). Modernizing African agribusiness: reflections for the future. Journal of Agribusiness in Developing and Emerging Economies, 1(1), 10-30. Haron, K. (1995). Evaluating the Perceived Effects of Total Quality Management (TQM) Training Program in Tenaga Nasional (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Pertanian Malaysia. Iqbal, M. (2007). Analisis peran pemangku kepentingan dan implementasinya dalam pembangunan pertanian. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian, 26(3), 89-99. Ismail, A. A. M., Alias, M. B. H. M., & Azmi, F. N. H. (2012). UMK-ECER: agropolitan project-initiatives in alleviating hardcore poverty. Ismail, R., & Othman, N. A. (2014). The Effectiveness of Government-Support Programmes Toward Business Growth. The Journal of Technology Management and Technopreneurship (JTMT), 2(2). Iswatia, S., & Anshoria, M. (2007, November). The influence of intellectual capital to financial performance at insurance companies in Jakarta Stock Exchange (JSE). In Proceedings of the 13th Asia Pacific Management Conference, Melbourne, Australia (pp. 1393-1399). Jabatan Perangkaan Malaysia (2017). Laporan Indikator Pertanian Terpilih. Malaysia https://www.dosm.gov.my/v1/index.php?r=column/pdfPrev&id=ditnZ2dtdXk5QWZTM29peUlZdW92QT09. Dilayari pada 1 April 2018. Jabatan Perdana Menteri. (2010). Program Transformasi Kerajaan. Unit Perangcang Ekonomi. Putrajaya. Jabatan Pertanian Negeri Kedah. (2013). Program Azam Tani. Malaysia. http://pertanian.kedah.gov.my/index.php/2013-11-21-07-45-07/azam-tani. Dilayari pada 10 Disember 2017. Jaffee, S., Kopicki, R., Labaste, P., & Christie, I. (2003). Modernizing Africa’s agro-food systems: analytical framework and implications for operations (No. 44). Africa region working paper series. Jipun J., Al-Halawani A., Mirwati Y., Quah W. B., and Kit L. K., (2017). Program Pembasmian Kemiskinan Pencapaian Program 1 AZAM Kolej Teknikal Yayasan Sabah Dalam Meningkatkan Pendapatan Peserta. https://www.academia.edu/32086939/PROGRAM_PEMBASMIAN_KEMISKINAN_PENCAPAIAN_PROGRAM_1AZAM_KOLEJ_TEKNIKAL_YAYASAN_SABAH_DALAM_MENINGKATKAN_PENDAPATAN_PESERTA_Page_159-168_Proceedings_ICoHLCB_Penang2017_v2.pdf. Dilayari pada 25 Mac 2018. Julnes, P. D. L., & Holzer, M. (2001). Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: An empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation. Public administration review, 61(6), 693-708. Kaine, G., Young, J., Lourey, R., & Greenhalgh, S. (2017). Policy choice framework: guiding policy makers in changing farmer behavior. Ecology and Society, 22(2). Kamal, A. H. (2016). Keberkesanan pengurusan e-Kasih dalam rangka pembasmian kemiskinan di Daerah Kota Tinggi Johor (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Utara Malaysia) Kementerian Pembangunan Wanita, Keluarga dan Masyarakat. (KPWKM). (2011). Impak Positif NKRA LIH. http://www.kpwkm.gov.my/nkra/impak. Dilayari pada 21 Februari 2018. Khan, M. A., Iqbal, M., & Saeed, I. (2005). Sustainable Cotton Production through Skill Development among Farmers: Evidence from Khairpur District of Sindh, Pakistan [with Comments]. The Pakistan Development Review, 695-716. King, R. P., Boehlje, M., Cook, M. L., & Sonka, S. T. (2010). Agribusiness economics and management. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 92(2), 554-570. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1975). Techniques for evaluating training programs. Evaluating training programs, 1-17. Kirkpatrick, D. L. (2000). Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels. The ASTD Handbook of Training Design and Delivery. Krishna, R. & C. Lovell. (1985). Rural and Development in Asia and the Pacific. The Synopsis of ADB Regional Seminar on Rural Development in Asia and the Pacific, 15−23 October 1984. Asian Development Bank, Manila. Kropp, J., & Peckham, J. G. (2015). US agricultural support programs and ethanol policies effects on farmland values and rental rates. Agricultural Finance Review, 75(2), 169-193. Lyons, P. (2005). A robust approach to employee skill and knowledge development. Industrial and Commercial Training, 37(1), 3-9. Martin, L. L., & Kettner, P. M. (1996). Measuring the performance of human service programs (Vol. 71). Sage. Merrigan, G., & Huston, C. L. (2004). Communication research methods. Wadsworth Publishing Company. Mohamad Ezanee, Y. (2016). Keberkesanan program latihan dalam meningkatkan prestasi kerja kakitangan pengurusan dan profesional (bukan akademik) di Universiti Utara Malaysia (Doctoral dissertation, Universiti Utara Malaysia). Morgan, S. L., Marsden, T., Miele, M., & Morley, A. (2010). Agricultural multifunctionality and farmers' entrepreneurial skills: A study of Tuscan and Welsh farmers. Journal of Rural Studies, 26(2), 116-129 Nawai, N., & Bashir, M. S. (2009). Evaluation of micro credit program for poverty alleviation: A case of Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia (AIM). Nkuruziza, G., Kasekende, F., Otengei, S. O., Mujabi, S., & Ntayi, J. M. (2016). An investigation of key predictors of performance of agricultural projects in Sub-Saharan Africa: A case of Uganda. International Journal of Social Economics, 43(7), 676-6 Omar, M. Z. (2010). The Role of Microcredit In Poverty Alleviation In Malaysia-The Case Of The Amanah Ikhtiar Malaysia AIM. Oral History Project Team. (2008). The oral history of evaluation: The professional development of Daniel L. Stufflebeam. American Journal of Evaluation, 29(4), 555-571. Pals, D. A., & Slocombe, J. W. (1989). Supervised Occupational Experience programs in vocational agriculture. Bulletin-Idaho Agricultural Experiment Station (USA). Petrzelka, P., Korsching, P. F., & Malia, J. E. (1996). Farmers' attitudes and behavior toward sustainable agriculture. The Journal of Environmental Education, 28(1), 38-44. Pollitt, C. (2005). The new public management in international perspective: An analysis of impacts and effects. In New Public Management (pp. 286-304). Routledge. Pollitt, M. G., & Smith, A. S. (2002). The restructuring and privatisation of British Rail: was it really that bad?. Fiscal Studies, 23(4), 463-502. Retallick, M. S. (2010). Implementation of supervised agricultural experience programs: The agriculture teachers' perspective. Journal of Agricultural Education, 51(4), 59. Robinson-Pant, A. (2016). Learning knowledge and skills for agriculture to improve rural livelihoods. UNESCO Publishing. Sekaran, U. (2003), Research method for business: A skill building approach, 4th ed. New York: John Willey & Sons. Siddiquee, N. A. (2014). Malaysia's government transformation programme: A preliminary assessment. Intellectual Discourse, 22(1), 7. Stasz, C., Eide, E. R., & Martorell, P. (2008). Post-secondary education in Qatar: Employer demand, student choice, and options for policy. Rand Corporation. Unit Penyelarasan Pelaksanaan (ICU). Jabatan Perdana Menteri. Putrajaya. www.ekasih.gov.my. Dilayari pada 5 Februari 2018. Vorley, B. (2001). The chains of agriculture: sustainability and the restructuring of agri-food markets. Waters, J. A. (1980). Managerial skill development. Academy of Management Review, 5(3), 449-453. Weimer, D. L. (1992). Political science, practitioner skill, and public management. Public Administration Review, 240-245. Wilkening, E. A. (1951). Social isolation and response of farmers to agricultural programs. American Sociological Review, 16(6), 836-837.