Kesan personaliti terhadap keenganan latihan dikalangan kakitangan Jabatan Kastam Diraja Malaysia

Kesan personaliti terhadap keenganan latihan dikalangan kakitangan Jabatan Kastam Diraja Malaysia

This research discussed the effect of personality on resistance to train among the staff at the Royal Customs of Malaysia, Port Klang. It was conducted to achieve five objectives: to determine whether (a) openness to experience personality affects resistance to train, (b) conscientiousness persona...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Muhamad Kamil, Muhammad Zain
Format: Thesis
Language:eng
eng
Published: 2019
Subjects:
HD28-70 Management
Industrial Management
Online Access:https://etd.uum.edu.my/8023/1/s818900_%201.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/8023/2/s818900_%202.pdf
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags, Be the first to tag this record!
id my-uum-etd.8023
record_format uketd_dc
institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
collection UUM ETD
language eng
eng
topic HD28-70 Management
Industrial Management
spellingShingle HD28-70 Management
Industrial Management
Muhamad Kamil, Muhammad Zain
Kesan personaliti terhadap keenganan latihan dikalangan kakitangan Jabatan Kastam Diraja Malaysia
description This research discussed the effect of personality on resistance to train among the staff at the Royal Customs of Malaysia, Port Klang. It was conducted to achieve five objectives: to determine whether (a) openness to experience personality affects resistance to train, (b) conscientiousness personality affects resistance to train, (c) extra version personality affects resistance to train, (d) agreeableness personality affects resistance to train, and (e) neuroticism personality affects resistance to train. This study involved the distribution of questionnaires among st 118 staff from Grade W19 to W44 who were selected randomly by using the proportionate stratified sampling frame. The researcher employed the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) constructed by Bamber and Castka (2006) and resistance to train measurement developed by Oreg (2003). The result of factor analysis revealed that personality among the respondents involved in this study include agreeableness and neuroticism, while emotional reaction and short-term cognitive are the dimensions representing resistance to train. To examine the effect of personality on resistance to train, the researcher executed multiple regression analysis. The result showed that neuroticism personality significantly affects resistance to train. In other words, employees who are not emotionally stable will show their resistance to train. The researcher suggests that the Training Unit of the Royal Customs of Malaysia as well as the Royal Customs Academy (AKMAL) must do training needs analysis encompassed with organizational task, and individual analyses for each staff to maintain appropriateness of training and maintaining good facilities in the academy. The implications of the findings, future research and practice, and the limitations of the present study are also discussed.
format Thesis
qualification_name masters
qualification_level Master's degree
author Muhamad Kamil, Muhammad Zain
author_facet Muhamad Kamil, Muhammad Zain
author_sort Muhamad Kamil, Muhammad Zain
title Kesan personaliti terhadap keenganan latihan dikalangan kakitangan Jabatan Kastam Diraja Malaysia
title_short Kesan personaliti terhadap keenganan latihan dikalangan kakitangan Jabatan Kastam Diraja Malaysia
title_full Kesan personaliti terhadap keenganan latihan dikalangan kakitangan Jabatan Kastam Diraja Malaysia
title_fullStr Kesan personaliti terhadap keenganan latihan dikalangan kakitangan Jabatan Kastam Diraja Malaysia
title_full_unstemmed Kesan personaliti terhadap keenganan latihan dikalangan kakitangan Jabatan Kastam Diraja Malaysia
title_sort kesan personaliti terhadap keenganan latihan dikalangan kakitangan jabatan kastam diraja malaysia
granting_institution Universiti Utara Malaysia
granting_department Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business
publishDate 2019
url https://etd.uum.edu.my/8023/1/s818900_%201.pdf
https://etd.uum.edu.my/8023/2/s818900_%202.pdf
_version_ 1747828308229226496
spelling my-uum-etd.80232022-02-16T02:48:32Z Kesan personaliti terhadap keenganan latihan dikalangan kakitangan Jabatan Kastam Diraja Malaysia 2019 Muhamad Kamil, Muhammad Zain Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business Othman Yeop Abdullah Graduate School of Business HD28-70 Management. Industrial Management This research discussed the effect of personality on resistance to train among the staff at the Royal Customs of Malaysia, Port Klang. It was conducted to achieve five objectives: to determine whether (a) openness to experience personality affects resistance to train, (b) conscientiousness personality affects resistance to train, (c) extra version personality affects resistance to train, (d) agreeableness personality affects resistance to train, and (e) neuroticism personality affects resistance to train. This study involved the distribution of questionnaires among st 118 staff from Grade W19 to W44 who were selected randomly by using the proportionate stratified sampling frame. The researcher employed the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) constructed by Bamber and Castka (2006) and resistance to train measurement developed by Oreg (2003). The result of factor analysis revealed that personality among the respondents involved in this study include agreeableness and neuroticism, while emotional reaction and short-term cognitive are the dimensions representing resistance to train. To examine the effect of personality on resistance to train, the researcher executed multiple regression analysis. The result showed that neuroticism personality significantly affects resistance to train. In other words, employees who are not emotionally stable will show their resistance to train. The researcher suggests that the Training Unit of the Royal Customs of Malaysia as well as the Royal Customs Academy (AKMAL) must do training needs analysis encompassed with organizational task, and individual analyses for each staff to maintain appropriateness of training and maintaining good facilities in the academy. The implications of the findings, future research and practice, and the limitations of the present study are also discussed. 2019 Thesis https://etd.uum.edu.my/8023/ https://etd.uum.edu.my/8023/1/s818900_%201.pdf text eng public https://etd.uum.edu.my/8023/2/s818900_%202.pdf text eng public masters masters Universiti Utara Malaysia Bamber, D., & Castka, P. (2006). Personality, organizational orientations and selfreprted learning outcomes. Journal of Workplace Learning, 73-92. doi:10.1108/1366562061064779 Barrick, M. R., & Mount, M. K. (1991). The Big-Five Personality Dimensions and Job Performance : A Meta-Analysis. Personel Psychology, 1-26. Big Dog & Little Dog's Performance Juxtaposition. (2000, May 29). Big Dog & Little Dog's Performance Juxtaposition. Retrieved Mac 4, 2012, from Big Dog & Little Dog's Performance Juxtaposition Web Site: http://www.nwlink.com/~donclark/hrd/learning/theories/self_system.html Bovey, W. H., & Hede, A. (2001). Resistance to organizational change: the role of cognitive and affective process. Leadership & Organizational Development Journal, 372-382. Carol, O. C. (1993). Managing Resistance to Change. Management Development Review, 25. Desimone, R. L., Werner, J. M., & Harris, D. M. (2002). Human Resource Development. United State: Harcourt College. Erwin, D. G., & Garman, A. N. (2010). Resistance to organizational change : linking research and practices. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 39-56. doi:10.1108/0143773101101037 Gholipour, A., Kalali, N. S., Anvari, M. R., & Yazdani, H. R. (2011). Investigation of the Effects of the Big-Five Personality Model on Job Burnout. International Conference on Economic and Finance Research, 171-178. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An Alternative "Description of Personality": The Big-Five Factor Structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1216-1229. Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Balkin, D. B., & Cardy, R. L. (2004). Managing Human Resources. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall. Hair, J. J., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis-A Global Perspective 7th Edition. New Jersey: Pearson. Hair, J., Money, A., Page, M., & Samouel, P. (2007). Research Method For Business. United State of America: Wiley.com. Helliriegel, D., Woodman, R. W., & Slocum, J. J. (2001). Organizational Behavior. United State of America: South-Western College Publishing. Jabatan Penerangan Malaysia. (2008, November 14). Jabatan Penerangan Malaysia. Retrieved October 14, 2012, from Pusat Maklumat Rakyat: http://pmr.penerangan.gov.my/index.php/component/content/article/110- ekonomi/8873-9-lagi-projek-baru-di-bawah-program-transformasi-kerajaan.html Kementerian Dalam Negeri. (2011, June 23). Kementerian Dalam Negeri. Retrieved October 13, 2012, from Portal Berita iKDN: http://portal.ikdn.gov.my/2011/06/soalan-soalan-lazim-program-6p/ Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining Sample Size For Research Activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 607-610. Liao, C.-S., & Lee, C.-W. (2009). An Empirical Study of Employee Job Involvement and Personality Traits: The Case of Taiwan. Internaltiona Journal of Economics and Management, 22-36. Omazie, D. M., Vlahov, R. D., & Basic, M. (2011). Relationship Between Personality Traits And Readiness for Organizational Change: A Case From Croatia. The Business Review, 156-162. Oreg, S. (2003). Resistance to Change : Developing an Individual Differences Measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 680-693. doi:10.1037/0021 Oreg, S. (2006). Personality, context and resistance to organizational change. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 73-101. doi:10.1080/13594320500451247 Otto, K., & Dalbert, C. (2012). Individual differences in job-related recolation readiness. Career Development International, 168-186. doi:10.1108/13620431211225340 Pihlak, U., & Alas, R. (2012). Resistance to change in India, Chinese and Estonian organzations. Journal of Indian Business Research, 224-243. doi:10.1108/17554191211274767 Senior, B., & Swailes, S. (2010). Organization Change. United Kindom: Pearson. Vakola, M., Tsaousis, I., & Nikolaou, I. (2004). The role of emotional intelligence and personality variables on attitude toward organizational change. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 88-110. doi:10.1108/02683940410526082 Wagner, R. J., & Campbell, J. (1994). Outdoor-based Experiential Training: Improving Transfer. Journal of Management Development, 4-11. Zee, K. V., Thijs, M., & Schakel, L. (2002). The Relationship of Emotional Intelligence with Academic Intelligence and the Big Five. European Journal of Personality, 103-125. doi:10.1002/434 Zikmund, W. G. (2000). Business Research Methods Sixth Edition. United State of America: Mike Roche.

Similar Items